A Norwegian regular reader passes this along.
Major Norwegian newspaper VG (vg.no) today have prison authorities confirm that mostly women send letters to Anders Breivik, the anti islamist who killed 77 people in 2011. Many of the letters are love declarations.
In the paragraph “Get [receives] letters from all over the world”:
It reads:
– He gets all kinds of letters. Senders [“Spammers” like Google Translate suggests is not the word used] are from all continents, some are very young, most of them are women, he gets some declarations of love, but the majority of the letters express support for his political views, says Hillesland.
Original link in Norwegian:
http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/terrorangrepet-22-juli-anders-behring-breivik/fengselet-stanser-breiviks-massebrev/a/23360188/
chicks dig jerks
yes they do
a jerk in jail
is extra diggable too!
Breivik is no Don Juan in the looks department, but he still gets more marriage proposals behind bars than a law-abiding beta male will ever get buying drinks for girls at bars.
Exhibit Anders in reflexive female desire for killer men should be heartening in at least one small way to dissident rightists: You can put to rest any theory that states young, fertile women must be won over first for a revolution to get off the ground. Nah. Assert your principles, start the revolution without the women, and the women will follow once you burnish some serious badboy iconoclast cred. Add a dollop of charm and a reckless disregard for the feelings of others, and the women will come running.
In totally unrelated news, J.K. Rowling has no idea why so many Harry Potter fangirls LOVE LOVE LOVE morally dubious badboy Draco Malfoy.
I once considered sending him a postcard with a picture of the beach and “Hey brah, congrats on a job well done!” written on it, but decided otherwise.
[…] Love Letters To Mass Murderers […]
Whenever Breivik is brought up I can’t help but think: countless young Arab men boast online about how they are going to kill people for political reasons, and at the most they manage to kill one or two. One White guy acting alone decides to do the same, and he kills seventy-seven people in one day. By methodical, careful planning where he teaches himself about explosives, tactics, and scouts the terrain.
Now, he is a proud Mason who describes himself as a “Christian Zionist”, pro-Israel with no links to real nationalism. The closest he came to any such link was signing up for the Nordisk forum, where he didn’t write about committing violence, because if he had people would have discouraged him. It was a counter-productive and attention-seeking act. Nevertheless. Talk about difference in competence. Any one of the Arabs or Pakis could have done the same, with other targets, but that would have required patience and intelligence.
9/11, Kenyan, and Tanzanian Embassy bombings would say Arabs are not always incompetent. But yes, lone wolf attacks are far more deadly in the main by Whites or Asians than non-Whites.
YKW.
Yes and Charles Manson is marrying a 26 year old. I wonder if these women are truly enamoured or are just typically hypergamous and hoping their connection with him will result in a book deal or additional attention whoring: “Everyone thinks he’s crazy but he’s sooooooooo sweet…really”.
There is a certain group of rebellious women who will always go for the different. Where I live I get a certain group of girls who usually settle for local Chinese guys and their beta ways chasing me and doing and saying things they would never do with anyone else.
I wonder if there is something “liberating” for women to chase guys who are otherwise totally or perhaps in some way unattainable.
Oh, it’s real. As sad as it is for a beta to internalize….the love from a women for a psycho/sociopath is the only true love there really is.
Retarded comment, punk. You don’t know the love of a father for his children, apparently.
Romantic love fuckwit. Eros.
You’re still wrong.
Tangentially off topic, but this theory of women loving bad boys reminds me of the Hitchcock film, Suspicion.
The wife, who’s repressed before meeting Mr. Grant, is constantly suspicious that he’s a murderer and will kill her. The whole film is framed to her suspicion until it is revealed that he’s trying to kill himself. Not sure where I read it, whether in the Truffaut book or another Hitchcock book, but the plan was for him to have planned on killing her all along, with the murder implied just before the end.
But, despite the fact that she feels deep down that her life’s in danger, she still hangs around. Hitch was a master at bringing the psyche of a character and cinematizing (to invent a phrase) this brilliantly. I gotta watch this film again.
In pure game terms Breivik is not a jerkboy, he doesn’t exhibit any of the characteristics of a suave Don Juan, he’s a lady-killer for sure, but not in the traditional sense. Apparently he had no sexual contact with women since 2002 (apart from prostitutes), he was also a recluse who stayed at home playing world of warcraft.
He was a depressed loser, and now the only thing going for him in the applied charisma stakes is his infamy. Girls for sure dig a jerkboy, but in this case you have attributed his young-girl love proposals to Jerkboy where as I would attribute it to fame.
Yeah, he’s closer to how Elliot Rodgers would be in jail if the kid hadn’t offed himself first.
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
In this case it might be different. They may be nationalist type females who view him as a fighter for their people. In addition to the regular tramps who mail regular, non-political criminals.
It’s interesting that most of the girls express support for his political beliefs. Does that mean the Norwegian government then arrests the girls and forces them to be raped by Africans until pregnant for the secular sin of daring to support Brevik?
Does the human species deserve to survive?
Surviving is the punishment, you just don’t know it yet.
Touché
Gaining access to rainbow island by disguising yourself as a police officer investigating a bombing you yourself committed, in order to mow down with extreme prejudice one-world, ivory tower, liberal shitlords in training for all the world to see, is easily one of the most entertaining stories I’ve ever come across. The fact that the female penchant for extreme bad boys extends well beyond their own stupid chick politic demarcations puts a big fat smile on my face.
He’s a good man and a good soldier. Here’s to hoping he gets paroled.
I can’t help but think he fired the first shot in a war as yet undeclared, but inevitable.
Yep.
Well put.
What is so out of sorts with his actions and story is how little the press touched on it after the shock wore off. We got the first reports, then a few huffy snarks about his background, then radio silence. No follow up. Hell I still don’t know precisely what they were teaching at that camp, outside of ooey gooey leftism with Micky Mouse ears on it.
That really, really raises some interesting questions in my mind.
Dynamic Silence is their friend, our enemy.
Look too deeply into his writings and suddenly questions arise about realpolitik in the West.
Besides, the MSM still thinks the JFK assassination has some legs left to it.
:BIG duckface:
Yeah, I know. Just found it interesting that they had the *perfect* setup for their narrative. Some blond haired blue eyed Aryan superman who mows down little Diversity Chillun’s with a machine gun. It’s absolutely straight out of one of their (countless) movie scripts. The event was like God descended from on High and offered them the kingdom of Heaven for free.
And they took a dive.
Clearly they smell the danger in the air. So much so that they’d pass on the perfect anti-white-male story that would cement their propaganda into history.
Very, very interesting.
Yeah, I recall a big deal was made about him and what he had done and you’re right, now there’s radio silence on it all. If not for this post, I would not have remembered the guy at all.
But I’m confused. Is the silence due to the fact he’s anti-muslim, or that’s just a red herring to more behind this story?
No idea mendozatorres. No idea.
@Greg (and I guess most here)
Germans apparently are getting all nationalistic again. The elite are scared shitless, you can tell by their immediate retreat to argumentum ad Godwin.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2014/12/23/17500-germans-gather-to-sing-christmas-carols-against-islamisation/
Read his pre-sentencing speech. It’s online and it is a searing, clearly reasoned indictment of Norway’s treatment of immigration dissidents. He documents soviet-like practices including psychiatric commitment of activists.
@the burninator
think about the way stories are assigned…in order for this incident to get exposure, a bunch of lefty news editors have to think about the incident and understand it enough to decide to pursue or not…
it’s ‘too real’…if they focus on this incident (of the evil gun violence by blonde white guy…lol) there is a good chance that some real talk might sink in…lol…it creates hugh cognitive dissonance….so it’s easier to just ‘not go there’…and pretend it didn’t happen. (as an aside, that’s why the false stuff (rape, guns, etc…) is so easy for the msm to push…no countervailing reality…lol)
also, if they do pursue it, some real talk might spill out and they’ll lose control of the narrative enough to ‘corrupt’ some of their supporters. at the least, some of the reporters that are assigned to ‘investigate’ will have to sift through his reasoning and there is a good chance that some of those reporters go…’hmmmm…he’s right!…’
on the upside (for the narrative), it’s just another white guy with a gun, regardless of all the ‘evil’ elements falling into place…
the cost/benefit analysis almost mandates that this incident will never see any exposure…
It isn’t just mass murderers who attract female attention. I just read that after the actor Richard Widmark appeared in a movie where he pushed an old woman in a wheelchair down the stairs while laughing maniacally he suddenly started receiving lots of fan mail from young females. Life magazine reported on this at the time in complete puzzlement why that would be.
Fascinating how they can’t bring themselves to mention his real politics. (Hint: he didn’t gun down muslim kids.) The left can’t face how much they are hated. (He was opposed to their policy of Moslem immigration, and to all their policies.)
http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/war_in_europe05.shtml
I agree with Varg Vikernes’s assessment of Breivik in that he was just another Jew tool and dupe helping his Zionist Jewish masters take the focus off of themselves and put it onto the muzzies and white Marxist useful idiots. Jew cointelpro fronts like VNN and Stormfront make a big deal about Breivik but the fact of the matter is he was bad news for our race just like George W. Bush was bad news and Clinton and all the other lowlife traitors and false white racialists we’ve had put in front of us over the years by the Jew propaganda masters.
He witnessed (and probably experienced) much muzzie bullying growing up in his beloved country… the LAST place on earth such things should have occurred.
Maybe if a Jew or two had taken his lunch money instead, he’d have joined the Taliban.
Bottom-line, he wasn’t a dupe of anyone… and he was smart enough and tactics-savvy enough to strike a true blow at the heart of a true enemy.
On that other “Zionist” subject, well… any man true to his beliefs that a people deserve a homeland in which to pursue their unique gifts and destiny cannot begrudge the Jews their Israel. The history of the world is the history of conquest.
But we WNs reserve the right to hate them, and anyone else, who hypocritically tries to take the moral high ground while seeking to corrupt our folk’s past and present, thereby destroying our folk’s future.
There is nothing that spells defeat (and stupidity) more than so called white nationalists fighting against third world immigration waving Israeli flags
One would think that it does not take a genius IQ to understand who is the originator of it, what is its purpose and how it is executed
Yet just a cursive reading of Breivik manifesto shows that he himself did not have the intellectual power to grasp it
It is absolutely essential to understand that the white bell curve is rather wide (unlike the Jewish one) with a significant majority located on its left side and therefore it is crucial to eradicate the corrupt “nose counting” system called democracy
If we are to prosper again we need to be led by an uncorrupted (or reasonably corrupted) elite of ours
Our enemies understand this only too well and use it in any subversive device they came up with for last a few hundred of years
As for Breivik final analysis there is only one thing that counts : Did he make the day when will rule our lands again closer by what he did?
Let everybody answer this question for himself
As for Zionists of course the moral hypocrisy of “tikkun olam” people stands high and speaks volumes about the true nature of the tribe
However the main point is different one
Zionist project is paid by our money and our blood and it is going to continue to be paid unless we take the power in our hands
Everything that happens in Russia should only be seen and understood in that light
Zionist will not blink once before destroying us if that is going to preserve their Zionist state
They are the force behind the Muslim importation in our lands and they are the force turning our hatred towards them, deflecting the attention (and hatred) from themselves. Divide and conquer is as old as the world itself
Know your enemy
Maybe he did understand it, and that’s why he didn’t go blow up a mosque or target muslims, per se… rather, he went after the youth corps of the traitors to their own kind.
First order of business in any successful fight is getting rid of the backstabbers in your midst… especially when they look like you.
You couldn’t really call him a “Zionist”… no more than myself.
And you can’t say Israel has no right to exist in one breath, while wanting a homeland for your own folk with the next exhale.
What you CAN say, however, is that the Zionists and their fellow travelers must be removed from YOUR folk’s midst… by any means necessary, due to their hypocrisy and deleterious effect upon your culture… and then let them hold onto Israel in a fair fight, if they can.
I never called Breivik a Zionist
If you read his manifesto you will find at multiple places his explicit support for Israel and Jews considering them allies in struggle against turd world invasion
So he clearly did not understand
As for “right to exist” I think I did explain my position clearly
As far as I am concerned they may exist under condition that they use their own money and blood for the survival
However one of the primary goals of their taking over West is to secure Israel existence with our money and our blood
That is why Europe is not multicultural enough for them It will become multi cultural enough when they have an unlimited political power as they have today in USA
Next time you see a crippled Iraq war veteran think about who is paying for their “right to exist”, think about all other instances past present and future in which we have /will squander(ed) our force, vitality and strength fighting the battles that not ours
helping his Zionist Jewish masters take the focus off of themselves and put it onto the muzzies and white Marxist useful idiots.
In Norway, the white Marxist useful idiots are far more of a problem than the jooz. Norway isn’t the USA.
Some people just overthink shit. The anti-Whites suffered losses and Internet geniuses explain why it’s bad for nationalists.
Breifist = lotsa fistigns 4 her