Ultimately, the problem with stupid, bitter feminists and their lackeys is their inability to understand, let alone empathize, with how differently from women that men are aroused to desire. Once you have convinced yourself that there are no real biological or psychosexual differences between men and women, it’s a small step from there to bemoaning catcalling while your tits are thrust three feet in front of you. This is what a religious adherence to feminist lies gets you: Fear and loathing of men because they get turned on by visual stimulus with an intensity and swiftness that is alien to your gynocentric worldview.
Most women who aren’t deranged feminists trying to make a victim class point know that, for instance, catcalling is mostly harmless, and take it in stride (even if driven to annoyance by excessive street solicitations). Normal, psychologically healthy women (read: pretty women), intuitively grasp that men and women are very different on and under the hood. They may not know the evolutionary reasons for the differences, or care to know, but their acceptance of men as men permits them to behave in a more charming feminine manner, and to appease men’s desire (or avoid inciting it when necessary) because it’s fun and exciting instead of an “injustice” that must be raged against. Feminist spite and resentment towards men comes from a place of studied ignorance and, in some instances, envy of male sexuality. I think a lot of avowed feminists are ugly broads who secretly yearn to possess the liberated and unencumbered sexual joy that is the birthright of men.
If there’s one common bond that unites all feminists and feminist-lite pundits, it’s a loathing of male desire. Scour away the SJW jargon and that’s the angry little id you’ll find deep inside shaking a clenched black fist at an unforgiving reality it cannot change.
I think it’s actually backwards. Feminists don’t loathe male desire, they loathe the lack of male desire that they receive. Specifically, ALPHA male desire. This is why the usual recipient of the scathing feminist hatred is the average beta male. Anyone would be annoyed by the snivelling-for-sex method.
Feminists of all varieties are simply sex market failures.
It could be argued that feminist controls on male behavior, speech, and action are attempts to manipulate the SMP in favor of less desirable women, i.e. feminists.
Though they are loathe to admit it, less desirable women benefited from a society characterized by more formal, traditional sexual mores and courtship process.
Non-beautiful women probably thrived in Victorian era compared to today, where a free sexual market prevails.
From now on I’m going to call second and third gen Feminism “Lena Dunham’s Revenge” and just be done with it.
“Though they are loathe to admit it, less desirable women benefited from a society characterized by more formal, traditional sexual mores and courtship process.”
Agreed. The irony-ery at it’s best.
Don’t hate me because I’m dutiful.
“The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire. She likes masculine admiration, however violently expressed, and is quite able to take care of herself.” – H.L. Mencken, 1918
“Alpha” male desire? Hardly. There is nothing that leftists (which feminists are) enjoy more than bringing down the successful.Envy, the essence of leftism? I’ve seen more than one woman try to destroy “Alphas,” contrary to the delusions they are gods somehow immune to female backstabbing. “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”
If that were true, Bob, you could easily list instances of hardcore professional feminists attacking true Alpha Males. For example, where is the shitstorm of rants against Paul Walker for shtupping 16-year-old girls? Where is the shitstorm of rants against Bill Clinton for shtupping Monica Lewinsky?
Is this why so many women end up in bed with the men they claim to hate? hehehe
The violent love of a strong man is a drug to any woman.
Feminists don’t loathe male desire. They FEAR it, because they cannot control it. Hence pretty much everything they’ve tried to achieve has nothing to do with egalitarianism or emancipation, but is really all about criminalising male desire and attempting to brainwash betas into thinking they function like women in the sexual arena.
Ordinary, more genteel approaches are not far removed from street cat calling. They are close enough to make you wonder if women, or certain women, think they are also “harassment”. Not to mention, the condemnation of males merely looking at women. I would like to know how Shoshanna Roberts’ boyfriend asked her out. Did he use his eyeballs at any point in the process? Did he say he thinks she is attractive? I am curious how relationships or even reproduction are supposed to work under the feminists vision. Maybe I will ask @proflbnielsen that.
Example of “harassment”. She feels entitled to stare, stalk and approach and give him her number. That IS RAPE!
His tattoo reads ‘the sky is the limit’ (for the number of love truncheons a perverted party grrl can have impaled herself upon, without jeopardising his undying devotion to her)
I heard he stuffed a $100 bill wrapped around a bunch of $1 bills into a bagel, tied it to a stick and dangled it in front of her.
That wouldn’t work. Any real Jew knows you put the big money on the inside.
@Skinner
no, you have it backwards. They fear it because it passes them by and ignores them for their peers.
Women don’t want to be in control. They have a desperate desire to surrender it.
Incorrect. Feminists DO want to be control. Most actual feminists (a very small proportion of the total affiliating cohort, but all of those who generate the ideology) are high-T lesbians.
Feminism, like all prog nonsense could be eliminated with a few, well targeted assassinations. Where’s Pinochet or Franco when you need them?
Agree 100%, Carlos. But we don’t need dead dictators. We just need to persuade the IRA or ETA out of retirement. Or your namesake, Mr The Jackal.
We always need dictators. The West prospered under dictatorship and is hijacked and killed under the corrupt, media-controlled institution called democracy.
Arbiter, what’s wrong with you? It’s true that neither Britain, during its long slow ascendency during the Industrial Revolution and the heyday of the Empire, nor America in its own gradual rise to take Britain’s place at the top of the world economic order, ever completely lived up to their ideals–but neither of them was *ever* remotely close to being a dictatorship during those times.
But isn’t leftist-feminist socialism a covert dictatorship? There you have it already.
Penis envy.
every time my probation officer sees me she says “penis cup”
what color is she?
Most droll, hoisting thwack by his own petard. lzozlzozlzozlozlozlozl
Next I expect thwack proclaiming, “my petard is bigger than your petard!”
Just another fan of my style; I need to get more jerseys made.
She is asking you to wear an athletic supporter, a cup, because wearing your undies down near your kneecaps (a/k/a down lo indicator) exposes yourself to her. And she has enough homeless guys in her life already.
Ain’t interested in exposing my equipment to the ladies, yo.
“Normal, psychologically healthy women (read: pretty women)”
really? I thought pretty women were the most damaged and hence the “don’t stick your dick in crazy” motto. Cause otherwise which healthy man would stick his dick in ugly?
Nonsense. White men generally don’t do that (they need not). It’s a Nog thing, 90%.
true, but it’s being presented AS IF white men are scum and they should all be ashamed!
Criminalize all male desire while letting women run around in NY half naked as if that ain’t provocation and harassment!
Regarding the video, I really think her purpose was to show how the hoodrats behave. But she can’t say that out loud. But that is, of course, the effect of the video.
[…] The Fundamental Problem With Man-Hating Feminists […]
pretty girls vs what a feminist looks like:
Is this one of those eyesight tests? I can see the top row just fine.
The bottom row looks all blurry and soft around the edges
large scale would bang vs would not bang test aka Victoria Secret vs Dear Kates
https://href.li/?http://www.dearkates.com/blogs/diary/15637197-the-perfect-body
I’m blind, someone tell me what color are they?
The top picture is what I was foolishly expecting when I was accepted to Yale oh so long ago. The bottom picture is what I discovered when I was finally on campus.
Honestly, I feel really sorry for Americans. Looking at the obesity statistics and hearing the testimonies, it must be painful to look around you and see the eyesores everywhere. And such a waste. So many who could have been attractive instead being turned into landwhales.
Feminist has latched onto this to win the fatty vote, but they weren’t the reason for this. West European countries also have feminism but not the same obesity rates. It is very much about food being much cheaper in the U.S. – you can see how obesity went up as food prices went down, which happened when the agricultural lobby convinced the government to stand handing out subsidies. Low taxes, which are otherwie a good thing of course, contributed by making food even cheaper.
I would suggest moving potato chips, soda and other poisonous products out of grocery stores as a first step. Put them in a separate store. People who are used to eating a lot simply cannot control themselves when these things are right in front of them every time they go to the store. What a relief to go to the grocery store and only see groceries. Unfortunately, neither leftists nor libertarians would ever support this.
“…you can see how obesity went up as food prices went down…”
That’s only part of the story. The other aspect is the heinously-misguided ‘food pyramid’ and pro-carb anti-fat diet recommendations put out by, guess who, the FedGov.
Highly educated and highly intelligent women generally aren’t attractive. Higher ed. is for ugly and mediocre girls that can’t get men to pay their bills. Very attractive women need a higher education diploma like a fish needs a bicycle. Bottom line.
Arbiter, because it’s an impractical idea.
You know the old line about beauty and brains multiplying to a constant?
If the bottom-rung ladies are trying to make a case for their bodies, why are they covering up?
the asian on the right–hell i’d bang her
“Zombie shame” The real shame is that a troll is too cowardly to use its own name.
Ar-Beta:You’re a fag
L to R
WB WNB CB WB CB WNB WB WB WNB WB
50% WB
20% CB
30% WNB
in other words, completely not representative of the female population as a whole, which is something like 25% 25% 50%
I love how on the Dear Kate site, a bunch of women say how perfectly beautiful the second set is … nauseatingly condescending comments … and others complain about the mix.
Aw c’mon! 2nd from R is okay…you’d have roll her in flour to find her wet spot, then tie a 2X4 to your back so you wouldn’t fall in….but hey: EQUALITY!
Note how in the second shot, the thin ones, who would show up the whole farce for what it is, are very carefully placed – they were required to hide themselves via awkward or turned poses. Specifically the tallish, thin and proportionate Asian third from right. They were trying to make a point, but even the photographer knew that to show them objectively would expose the lie – thus the posing.
About half of the second set of women are doable.
Funny how in the heavier pic the slimmest is an Asian and the fattest are Blacks. Even in a feminist group. Plus ça change….
It is only fitting that the heavier cohort is at the bottom. They’d have trouble getting up the stairs to the top pic, and the top floor might cave in. For safety reasons feminists should always be on the bottom floor.
2 gorillas in that bottom shot…
“As if women need a reminder of our society’s homogenous definition of beauty”
That line was the cracker, although the job title stuff at the bottom is almost as hilarious.
“New York based performance artist, who tackles issues of social/political injustices within her work”
As an opressed black wymyn she’ll never be out of work.
Top – Correct
Bottom – the slogan you want is THIS IS WHAT A FEMINIST LOOKS LIKE!!!
Ch, A little tip from a reader
http://henrymakow.com/2014/11/gender-chaos-females-demand.html
Exerpt/ Last month, Mount Holyoke College announced a more far-reaching policy: It would admit all academically qualified students regardless of their anatomy or self-proclaimed gender, except for those biologically male at birth –
They (feminists) resent the fact that nature/God gave them a womb that can and will be home to a child, and that as a result they must be *responsible* for that womb and child. Thus, they must be held accountable for their actions BY NATURE. This is where the women’s lib movement toward birth control and then abortion came from. **It isn’t liberation from men. It is liberation from their own bodies.** They hate that there are consequences for their sexual behavior, where men have practically none. They resent men for not having the burden of being selective about mating, and dealing with the consequences of their sexual agenda.
In short, the fem-twats want to be freed from having to live in a word of consequences.
Typo: “a WORLD of consequences”
“How do you write women so well?”
“I think of a man… and remove all reason and accountability.”
Dood! I was gonna leave that on there a second ago! NICE!
I can never resist a Nicholson homage. 😉
Love that moment. Had me rolling the first time I saw it.
I’ve never let feminism stand in my way….
Progs in general want a world without consequences for stupidity.
Insightful critique pupton
It’s really about the expectation that white men should ensure safety for white women to better compete against white men.
I propose a volunteer army of white avengers based on the Guardian Angel model, complete with paramilitary get-ups and ill-fitting berets. These elite commandos can set up stations near every street corner where shiftless idle black men congregate and provide safe passage escort through the gauntlets of braying black jackasses for young female liberal-arts graduates who are just trying to do their damn jobs. Should some Black Gentleman say something imprudent to a white lady they can call for reinforcement and video-tape the miscreants acting the fool. If he gets boisterous and has to be “put down” it will provide fodder for 10,000 world-wide-web think-pieces and television expose’s, thus feeding this vital segment of our economy.
I volunteer to work along side web journalists from Salon and Slate to set up a site to collect donations for uniforms and communications gear. Concerned black male allies (themselves disgusted by the behavior of their “brothers”) can provide realistic training scenarios (to be featured on PBS and ABC’s 20/20) for recruits to endure as they aspire to attain the coveted White Wings badge for service in defense of the homeland gender. I will retain a small percent of the monetary contributions to compensate for my marketing and management expertise.
Any “concerned black male allies” would merely attempt to wear their berets backwards.
You need something more distinctive that black berets. Something white, and eye-catching. Maybe a tall pointy white hat. And you can include a face-covering for warmth . . .
“…shiftless ? idle? black?….” unnecessary redundancies anyone?
For elmer’s army I suggest shirts in a brown nuance, to show that it is a down-to-earth movement that seeks to return things to their natural state. The ancient symbol for the sun wheel could be carries on their upper arms to further emphasize the back-to-nature aspect. To show that they mean to put an end to ghetto-style nonsense their greeting would be to hold up a hand, palm facing forward, as a stop sign. Stop right there, buddy! None of your shenanigans here!
” Concerned black male allies ”
Oh man, that’s a good one, had me rolling on the floor. I challenge anyone to name a cause the black race is concerned about, that isn’t directly connected with itself. Hell, even the rich blacks in America have never lifted a finger to help their brethren, in beloved mother Africa, although they have the means. They don’t have an altruistic bone in their bodies.
Hammer of Love
I challenge anyone to name a cause the black race is concerned about, that isn’t directly connected with itself.
———————————————————————————————-
But isn’t that what game is all about?
Making YOU the most important person in your world?
(Don’t make me get Nicole in here to splain it to you)
Dear Thwack, since the owner of this blog has come out of the closet, I have no desire to explain anything that would be helpful to these eunuchs.
One thing I try to do is keep my few European genes in check, so I did take the advice given here (that was probably not for my benefit, but oh well) about pathological altruism on board. Trying to help people who want to hang you from a tree is self destructive and stupid.
So they have my full blessing for whatever “white” knight organization they create to protect ugly yet immodest feminists from African and culturally aware European sexual attention. Eunuchs protecting the collective harem. That’s good comedy. 🙂
Apparently thwack and Nicole… and perhaps a few other of the chateau’s dusky visitors… have a hot line…
… or is it merely the Sunstein network?
White male spite and resentment towards black men comes from a place of studied ignorance and, in some instances, envy of black male sexuality. I think a lot of avowed beta white males and wannabe alpha white males are ugly dudes who secretly yearn to possess the liberated and unencumbered sexual joy that is the birthright of alpha men in general and black men in particular.
If there’s one common bond that unites all racist beta white males and wannabe alpha white males racists, it’s a loathing of black male desire. Scour away the HBD jargon and that’s the angry little id you’ll find deep inside shaking a clenched pale fist at an unforgiving reality it cannot change.
I couldn’t have said it better myself…
You guys don’t have anything to trade. No one wants your women. Everyone wants ours.
Plus you guys built dem ‘Gyptian Peermids and Flyin Machines!!
Who said anything about trading?
Uhmmm yeah right. It has nothing to do with the skyrocketing crime rates, the debasement of culture, the lack of honor, the lack of work ethic, the entitlement attitudes, and the uncontrolled aggression that has been unleashed on white societies by the the “mythical ” black man.
Where are the great African works on sexuality, since they are such masters at it ? Anything comparable to the Karma Sutra will suffice. That’s right, there are none. These masters of sexuality haven’t produced any great work about it ? How odd. How odd in deed.
Coat hanger of Love
Where are the great African works on sexuality, since they are such masters at it ?
———————————————————————————–
They are out PRACTICING it instead of shaking a clenched pale fist at an unforgiving reality they cannot change.
I always marvel at the accomplishments of the African Space Program, the intricate mud hut architectire and the advanced health care technology.
can i trade your delusional Mandingo Myth for….oh, I dunno, organized control of the entire planet?
Oh wait, I already have that, and your whole thing is …… schtick…
Buffoonikum
can i trade your delusional Mandingo Myth for….oh, I dunno, organized control of the entire planet?
———————————————————————————-
If you have organized control of the entire planet, why do you need to learn game?
Thwack said: ” Who said anything about trading?”.
He’s absolutely right, black men just take what they want –
“http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26368
White male spite and resentment towards black men comes from a place of studied ignorance and, in some instances, envy of black male sexuality.
Odd that… when it comes to spite, resentment and envy, YT could learn a thing or two from you darkies, who are past and current masters at THOSE traits.
Then again, that’s the LAST thing your ilk would want to have happen… for then there wouldn’t be a shit-coloured visage left on the planet.
Two points:
99% of sexist, terrible, horrible men said absolutely nothing to her
Retard spam game gets you more tail than no game
Women still expect men to approach, so if retard spam game is all you got – use it.
Yup.
If you approach 100 women with a tactic guaranteed to work 1% of the time, you get a date.
If you don’t approach 100 women, you get no date.
It’s why men are so aggressive–fortune favors the bold.
Fuck yeah dood.
1% close rate is better than 0%.
I was astonished as a young fella observing Black Gentlemen grabbing their dicks and making an exaggerated hand gesture while loudly saying “Psssssttt!!!!” to women on the other side of the street. Astonished because some of the targets responded positively to these entreaties.
OT, but I think Snowden’s girlfriend coming to be with him has more to do with him living in Moscow and having free access to all that world class poon than with him missing her.
She is a good woman for joining him, knowing how the tyrannical establishment will mark her for life. And he is a good man. I wish them all the best. If there was ever a president who truly cared about Americans he would put Edward Snowden in charge of the NSA to clean up that agency and put those who have broken American law behind bars.
There’s another possibility. She might have been gently ” persuaded ” by one of the Alphabet agencies to track his movements, and provide information to facilitate his ” voluntary ” return, so that “justice” can be served.
Actually HOL, I’m inclined to agree with you. @Arbiter- although I’m inclined to see the heart warming aspects of her move you cite, being a sentimentalist myself, that tendency is contradicted by the fact that she is/was a stripper.
If that’s her background, bet money that she’s working as a shill for the Firm in re Snowden.
most men and women in the us think of themselves are a feminist…but show them what a feminist really is and they will deny the de facto essense even if they keep the form…
Don’t miss your man Phillip Wyeth giving the stick to Wellesley College on Henry Makow’s Nov 3, 2014 post
http://henrymakow.com/2014/11/gender-chaos-females-demand.html
BLT on G sesame buns served up on the Boassian smorg at Wellesley. Neglects the Juice however. So no Mazel Tov.
It’s a mistake to assume that all Feminists are just bitter ugly girls. That may have been true 10-20 years ago, but now it seems that a lot of attractive women are using Feminism as a shit test. Shoshana Roberts is one of them. Don’t believe me? Take a look at this photo of her and tell me you would not bang:
CH, this pic gets through but mine are stuck in moderation? There is no justice in the world.
But yes, women – and many men – calling themselves feminists is now as important as calling yourself a communist in the Soviet Union. Or siding with the conquerors in any defeated nation. The same mental reflex is involved.
Punjabi porn actress Belle Knox comes to mind. After being exposed in the media she calls herself a feminist, despite doing something feminists hate. She says “I am extremely dangerous to the patriarchy, a woman in charge of her own sexuality.” So other women, who don’t do porn and only sleep with those they are attracted to, are not in charge of their own sexuality? It’s only if you are forced to sell sex for tuition money that you are in charge of the sex? Completely upside down. But she needs to side with the feminists or she will be attacked in a number of ways, especially when residing at campus.
Post better pictures
As opposed to yours, Tim?
No, it’s that I posted several pictures in the same post, that’s when they are moderated.
@Arbiter
Dude, nobody wants to see you in an I Dream of Jeanie Costume.
Lovefest between Tim and Corey. How quaint.
“I dream of Jeanie costume”? You find out the names of various costumes for women? There is only one kind of man that learns details about female dresses aside from how they show the body. Looking for a job in the fashion industry, perhaps?
LOL.
Rage harder.
Don’t hate me because I’m fabulous.
“After being exposed in the media she calls herself a feminist, despite doing something feminists hate.”
She was on Stossel’s program a while back basically claiming to be a free market libertarian and that she was saving taxpayers money by choosing to do porn to pay her tuition. I seriously doubt she’s both a libertarian and a Feminist.
More likely, she’s a shape-shifting hamster; she’ll be anything people want to get them to approve of her porn career.
I would look pretty bangable in that outfit, yo.
I see what you did there corey.
I approve.
fuckabillity isn’t a measure of attractiveness to men. Most dudes will fuck pretty much anything. BTW, face = 4, body = 6 (of you like chubby). She has that body type that especially black men like. Asians and whites aren’t too fond of it.
“She has that body type that especially black men like. ”
One with a pulse?
Can I wear a Yarmulke during coitus ?
Always acceptable, especially if worn with irony.
When you fuck, call her a dirty 2 dollar jewish whore and make her call you Jesus;
Wus my name?
*smack*
Wus my name bitch?
*smack*
Jesus who bitch?
*smack*
Sure, if you put it on the end, it can do double duty.
On ya dick?
Can I wear a Yarmulke during coitus ?
Her head’s so far up her twat she could use a tampon as a yarmulke.
I’d bang her but I would be reluctant to put a ring on it because she’s still only about a six.
You’d find a lot of dried semen in there but fear not..None will be mine
not ltr material lookswise
It looks as if she has hair on her stomach.
She gives me the stinky poon hairy butthole with toilet paper dinggle berry vibe.
Agreed. I saw the dark hair line on her stomach too but avoided commenting on it.
Would not bang. Jew, you didn’t see the happy trail because it’s buried in her fat crease?
Yeah, I’d bang.
I’d also like to stick it her jew asshole (wrapped of course) and make it gape.
Take away her impressive rack and she immediately loses 3 points.
Shoshana Roberts is 10 years (at best) from “pulling the ripcord” (think parachuting visual) and blowing out by at least five dress sizes.
fat with a beat face. I wouldn’t touch her with YOUR Arbiter.
With that swarthy man face, I wouldn’t be surprised if she had a big pair of matzo balls tucked between her hairy legs.
Take a look at this photo of her and tell me you would not bang:
That phiz is definitely a deal breaker for me… guess I’m just not “alpha” enough. lzozlzozlzolzolozl
Where the hell are Lena Dunham and the other feminists to protest slavery of teenage girls in the Middle East:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2818598/Footage-shows-ISIS-fighters-attending-slave-girl-market.html
They don’t want to offend the religion of ” peace “. A piece of slave girl’s ass that is.
The same place all those whoring starlets were at the Academy Awards awhile back… each of them tearfully pontificating about their brave and stalwart grandmothers and mothers who “inspired” them to “go beyond the boundaries”… until you could hear a pin drop and not a peep when “It’s Hard Out Here For A Pimp” won Best Song.
Haha, brilliant. Hypocrisy remains a constant source of mirth.
If Lena Dunham has taught us anything, it’s that it’s OK for rich white girls to molest toddlers. It’s “ironic” and “refreshingly revealing” since she’s a woman. While men showing interest and giving compliments to a grown woman walking in public is not OK and may become illegal:
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/10/31/do-we-need-a-law-against-catcalling/street-harassment-law-would-restrict-intimidating-behavior
this kerfuffle will take this dumb beaver down. 10-1 odds.
I’m doubtful. The toxicity of U.S. culture is to the point where even admitting such depraved behavior while profiting from it in a book will be a speed bump in her career at most.
i dunno. the left is freaking on her.
That’s the beauty of the MSM… they make depravity seem acceptible so that the depraved ones eventually out themselves… only to learn what the real world truly thinks about their swinery.
Expect a sort of “it’s only a piece of stream-of-consciousness fiction” backpedaling.
Relevant to MSM and libtards preaching about white privilege:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25268366
This also has interesting political repercussions I would think.
In a feminist/matriarchial society which culturally, socially and legally incentivises cuckoldry, the bottom 85 percent of men are better off shifting their loyalties to an anti-feminist/patriarchal society, as such a society would proscribe women’s natural/instinctual inclinations to cuckold such men.
In the future, you may see a mass exodus of the bottom 85 percent of men to patriarchal countries like Russia and the Middle East or atleastly a shift in support of the cultural imperialism/hegemony of those countries as those countries would espouse a cultural, social and legal regime that proscribes the bottom 85 percent of men’s reproductive exploitation.
Hidden down in the results section of this study
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17201549
The results of this study support the good genes hypothesis. When women are fertile and rating men’s attractiveness as short-term partners, they are particularly attracted to traits that tend to be valued in short-term mates. No preference shifts in favor of traits deemed more valuable in long-term mates (e.g., good father, faithful, warm, financially successful) were found (although men perceived as less faithful were rated as particularly attractive as short-term mates by fertile women, perhaps because such men possess other traits that women find attractive in short-term mates). Consistent with past research (Gangestad et al., 2004; Haselton & Miller, 2006; Johnston et al., 2001; Penton-Voak et al., 1999; Puts, 2005), we did not find shifts in mate preferences over the reproductive cycle in both long-term and short-term mating contexts. Rather, mating context interacted with fertility status to predict women’s specific mate preferences. Near ovulation, traits indicative of greater intrasexual competitiveness were viewed as particularly attractive in short-term compared with long-term mates.
You have nailed the psychology for the man-faced worldview, but I believe the philosophical underpinnings for the average clipped-haired man-hater are far simpler. Your run-of-the-mill, self-described feminist takes her bowlegged stance against men because it is easy and profitable. Easy in that she will not be challenged by more sane members of society and easy to justify the lack of attention she receives from male suitors. Profitable in that it allows the socially awkward and unattractive to gain a curious status within polite society and, in a some cases, advances their career and earning potential.
Lower income, uneducated gooey excuses for the fairer sex seldom take the feminist position as they rightfully see the futility in it. It will not earn them a higher social status nor will it profit them financially. Obese ghetto broodmares and tooth rednecks, provided they are getting their welfare checks, could give a fat frog’s ass about the patriarchy. They only turn to man-hating when it comes to nailing some sad sap who forgot the cardinal rule: jerk before you squirt.
And so help me Jeebus, I hope that Emily Ratajkowski is just shi-testing when she calls herself a feminist.
http://www.independent.ie/style/beauty/body/emily-ratajkowski-on-feminism-i-wear-what-i-want-sleep-with-who-i-want-and-dance-how-i-want-30629431.html
Please, by the power of RSD, tell me she’s not going to turn out just another example of GBFM’s used-up Bernankified btthexxers.
One look at her and I can assure you that she can’t dance. Any woman who announces her dance ability usually is so awkward that it bangs your joints horribly trying to stay on-beat. They are best avoided for more humble fare.
[…] Ultimately, the problem with stupid, bitter feminists and their lackeys is their inability to understand, let alone empathize, with how differently from women that men are aroused to desire. […]
Meanwhile, we have a RSD PUA causing somewhat of a stir in the Land Down Under …
http://www.dailylife.com.au/news-and-views/news-features/there-is-a-changeorg-petition-to-ban-pick-up-artist-julien-blancs-melbourne-seminar-20141104-11ghfn.html
I think the problem of all fanatical ideologists is demonizing and dehumanizing their opponents. If they would stop and think for a minute they would realize that men have problems as well despite being “privileged”.
They’ve taken their toxic shame and alienation and displaced it onto us in a constant attack on our values. The manosphere is a creation of feminism.
[…] Olympics. Related: Cat-calling, race, and rape stats. Related: Wright comments. Related: The fundamental problem with man-hating feminists. Related: 10 hours walking as a racist white woman. Related: Should […]
Women are so downtrodden. Men are such bad, evil people. Don’t believe me? Check this out:
http://www.realsexism.com/
After you read this, there will be no doubt in your mind as to why men are so evil.
#KillAllMen
#CastrateAllMen