Those red and blue state by state maps of the voting preferences of various US demos aren't totally useless as tools to discern the broad outlines of where the country is heading.
Yes, there is a Uniparty and the whole thing is an elaborate zog and pony show designed to enrich the epstein class and to prevent White racial identity from forming. Red and blue, R and D, don't mean much in that context, because you're getting the same outcome either way, just with different embroidery.
However, in politics, perception matters. As long as the competing voter demos perceive differences in the parties, and hold assumptions about what each party represents, the red-blue color maps remain valid indicators of the national mood and the future of the country.
If only White men voted, the country would be painted red. The cynic would say, "yeah, and?". But those White men are voting with a preexisting template of the Ideal Society, and have imbued each party with characteristics that oppose or support that ideal.
The fact that those assumptions and imbued notions are false does not change the psychological profile of the White male voter.
His values are not the problem.
His loyalty to a system that does not deserve it is the problem. But all loyalties have a retraction point. We are reaching the limit of ours.
