Feed on
Posts
Comments

The Tall And Short Of It

I love the long legs of tall slender women, but shorter slender women often have better overall bodies punctuated by pertly round asses and fleshy tits. Taller women tend to have leaner, less curvaceous figures and flatter asses.

This is my burden of choice. Lord help me carry on.

476 Responses to “The Tall And Short Of It”

  1. Every man has his cross to bear.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Think of da chillunzzzezes.

      You m@rry a small chick, and your progeny by her ain’t getting no NCAA Div I scholarship offers in football or baseball or swimming or lacrosse.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        BTW, this is the actual team photo for the 2016-2017 Florida Gators Women’s Swimming Team:

        Liked by 7 people

      • Wrong Side of History says:

        “Think of da chillunzzzezes.”

        How many pups do you have again, CO?

        Incel? Shooting blanks?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “Wrong Side of History”

        Like

      • ar10308 says:

        Female collegiate athletes are usually more degenerate and sluttier than the men.

        Liked by 4 people

      • elmertjones says:

        Well they don’t call them squareheads for nothing.

        Like

      • i usually agree with you captain but tall isn’t the be all to end all. and most tall women are not attractive. that implies nature doesn’t intend for them to be that way.

        also, we shouldn’t be focusing on breeding children simply so they can succeed in sports and athletic endeavors. that’s the black man’s game.

        our people should be bred for something greater than that. we aren’t animals.

        Liked by 3 people

      • ar10308 is right.

        they also make for bad long term prospects. either they have too much testosterone in running through their veins because of all the sports or they were already masculine to begin with so that’s why they got into them.

        either way, they are not feminine women in general. they act more like dudes than girls. bust your balls all the time and even if you do get them to dress like a girl sometimes, it’s not natural at all. they have the grace and feminine poise of a 14 year old boy. i’ve dated a few and it was the same for all of them. gets tiring when it’s like two dudes trying to be in a relationship together. no thanks.

        Liked by 4 people

      • itsme says:

        women should stay away from most competitive sports. things like ballet and gymnastics are okay if they don’t mind the injuries.

        female swimmers tend to be bulky (i.e. a lot of subcutaneous fat as in that photo above).

        swim team =/= bikini team

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Biological Calvinism says that our sense of external Beauty in a woman tends to correlate with her inner intelligence & moral character.

        Otherwise Whites would have evolved to prefer short, fat & ugly.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Is this guy retarded or what? Only muh preferences are pure.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Yeah, because these are your preferences, Muh Labia.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Like

      • “Biological Calvinism says that our sense of external Beauty in a woman tends to correlate with her inner intelligence & moral character.

        Otherwise Whites would have evolved to prefer short, fat & ugly.”

        right. so by that logic, since tall manly women with big square shoulders, no hips or ass who walk around like bigfoot and have bigger feet and hands than most men are a lot less attractive than short/average delicate curvy feminine women, they don’t have as much internal intelligence or moral character. that makes small feminine women superior.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Under 20, then. Being charitable.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Fucking ghey mod! 😡

        BTW, this is the actual team photo for the 2016-2017 Florida Gators Women’s Swimming Team:

        Can’t be… we have it on good a-u-t-h-o-r-i-t-y, here at the chateau, that American girls are all fat, tatted-up, sloots… which MUST be true, since we’re assured of such by the likes of no-bones, wolfenberg, MuhLabia, WrongHaidOfHistory, et. al.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        The word a-u-t-h-o-r-i-t-y triggers mod?

        Really, CH? Really?

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • ML says:

        Yea man everyone has a personal stake in convincing you that American women are gross. The world fucking revolves are you, old man.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Duderino says:

        Ive heard enough girls shit on short guys that I think of tall girls as wife material; I don’t want any of my sons dealing with the burden of shortness.

        Alas I love short and curvy girls

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “American girls are all fat, tatted-up, sloots”

        GE, I think you’re right – if you click on that pic of the Gators Swim Team, you get a larger version which is 1600 pixels wide – and I see zero Tats on those chicks. Nor any fat.

        Nice Girls. From Good Families. Bunz -> Ovenzzzezes.

        Like

      • ML says:

        “Ive heard enough girls shit on short guys that I think of tall girls as wife material; I don’t want any of my sons dealing with the burden of shortness.

        Alas I love short and curvy girls”

        This comment encapsulates the very push-pull that creates height disparities: on the one hand you know that, socially, being short as a man is a handicap, while instinctively you prefer shorter women because they’re more evidently female / fertile.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Yea man everyone has a personal stake in convincing you that American women are gross. The world fucking revolves are you, old man.

        Cap’n Obvious shows a nice picture of some modern American women that puts the lie to the attempted demoralization by pricks like you ’round chere who would have us believe that no such thing exists and the White race is doomed anyway, and you try to make this like MY calling out the agitprop lie makes it a personal issue?

        WTF is wrong with your thought process?

        Try to conceal the raw nerves of your butthurt in a more dignified and manly fashion next time.

        And stay off my lawn.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        “WTF is wrong with your thought process?”

        Your egotism keeps interrupting it. I mean really, just shut the fuck up. You’re annoying like a little child.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Why don’t YOU shut the fuck up, rather than attempting to curtail my privilege of free speech at the chateau?

        It’s your own ill-merited and over-inflated ego that projects as interpreting the same in my putting a well-intention oar into the waters of this forum.

        And for the record, since you mentioned children, it’s your own petulance that reeks of that sort of immaturity… and annoyance.

        Besides, you couldn’t tell us anything about children, not having any of your own… nor w-i-f-e… nor property… nor dick.

        So put a clamp on your own snarky pie hole before you deign to scold your betters. 😡

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        No ring needed.
        Bunz find their way into ovenzeszzes without rings, ceremonies or documents.

        Like

      • Exurban says:

        That swim team has four or five victims of hair bleaching, and there is some poorly chosen footwear on display, but other than that, yowza. It gives hope for America.

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        “Biological Calvinism says that our sense of external Beauty in a woman tends to correlate with her inner intelligence & moral character.

        Otherwise Whites would have evolved to prefer short, fat & ugly.”

        IOW, the producers of Shallow Hal are back-asswards. lzolzoz

        Like

      • skorzecin150 says:

        On the Gators pic take a closer look. Some are ok, and yes, they’re not fat, but it’s hardly the Miss Universe line up.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Okay, (((skorzecin150))), you go find a pure blood – from Mesoamerica or Sub-Saharan Africa or the Indian Subcontinent or Indonesia/Micronesia or China or, for that matter, one of you pure-blood Khazarian witches – who can hold a candle to the ugliest chick on that team, and get back to me in about 27,000 years if you think you’ve found a candidate.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        Being a boring sort of jackass, I’ve always preferred medium-height, medium-build women. Neither beanpole nor runt, skinny nor zaftig, has much draw for me, though I have no quarrel with a brother who prefers other combinations.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        On the Gators pic take a closer look. Some are ok, and yes, they’re not fat, but it’s hardly the Miss Universe line up.

        Of course it isn’t… they’re pretty much all Aryans, and looks like what a real beauty contest SHOULD look like, in my book. ;-).

        Geez, Louise and hell, man… It may not be the Miss Universe line up, but it’ll damn sure do until that line up gets here!

        Like

      • SteveRogers42 says:

        Front row, right.

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        @ Cappie:

        1. A lot of those girls are quite simply plain.

        2. “Find a pure blood…who can hold a candle to the ugliest chick on that team.”

        I have fucked dozens of women in Asia who are more attractive than the *prettiest* woman on that team.

        We all want to breed tall boys but femininity is a factor here too and that lot look too much like Ian Thorpe for my taste.

        Like

      • SteveRogers42 says:

        Hillsdale College women’s basketball:

        Liked by 2 people

      • farmlegend says:

        Thanks for sharing, Steverrogers. My farm (hunting prop) lies seven miles from where those lasses were posing.

        Like

      • SixGun says:

        Captain Obvious

        Cheerleader effect

        Liked by 1 person

    • Democritus says:

      @Duderino

      [I don’t want any of my sons dealing with the burden of shortness…I love short and curvy girls]

      Short/curvy girls can have tall sons too, depending on the father.

      Like

  2. Nads says:

    Variety is the spice of life.

    And looking for exceptions to the flat-arsed tall women rule sounds like an enjoyable goal in life.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Scanman says:

      WGAF?

      So much blood and treasure and time and energy and concern utterly squandered on this vicious, predatory people that constitute less than 1% of the world’s population.

      When nothing you do will ever be enough, isn’t the sane, rational thing to stop trying?

      Liked by 3 people

      • trav777 says:

        average black person couldn’t tell you Robert E. Lee’s middle initial, much less who the hell he was or which statues he is.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Lichthof says:

        Egsactkly…its kikes and white shitlibs who do all this shit.
        My boss is an uber shitlib…and gave a nig …employee multiple chances even though nig…was not qualified and other shitlibs in the office refused to work with said nig..now nig is suing after the inevitable firing

        Like

    • Wild Man says:

      Ivanka’s rabbi = Jewish Retard

      Like

  3. pdwalker says:

    that’s why polygamy was invented, so you could have your cake and eat it too.

    Like

  4. racerxx says:

    We call those tall women with no asses “Longbacks”

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=long%20back

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Pwn says:

    Teenage girls: long legs and ass and tits.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Nads says:

      18 year old girls. Right?

      Like

      • Pwn says:

        No. I’m European so we have better laws in this regard.

        Liked by 2 people

      • ML says:

        A+++

        Liked by 2 people

      • trav777 says:

        The AoC is not 18 in the entire USA, nor the world

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        Most of the states with lower AOC have proximity laws though. Couple years ago I got it on with a sixteen year old in a pool — ha, literally poolside — at some motel in God knows where, North Carolina. She and her mom came in yacking in a Boston accent, so I knew it was game on. She was all set to come back to my room an hour later, but I had second thoughts and consulted a buddy: check for proximity law. Sure enough, has to be within four years of the minor. No joy.

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        Before anyone pounces on me for being a degenerate, trust me when I say the cradle had done been robbed and she welcomed all of it.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        ML=Jerry=Subway masturbator knew it.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        You think Muh Labia == Synagogue Masturbator?

        Now that would cumming full circle.

        Like

      • ML says:

        I’m reminiscing about groping a teenager in a pool and you still manage to be more disgusting. How old are you, anyway? For your sake, please don’t be over 20 or less than 60.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I doubt he’s our estwhile Metro Onan… the style of THAT dastard was more in line with dweebstreep… he’d only show up to attempt personal neener-neeners on a select few.

        This MuhLabia is more reminiscent of corn-pwn, WrongHaidOfHistory, and that ilk.

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        “The AoC is not 18 in the entire USA, nor the world”

        It’s set at 18 in many places by an alliance of tradcons and feminazis to punish men for going after jailbait. AoC should be 15 and no higher.

        Like

  6. ML says:

    I fail to see why this requires a disclaimer. Men are selected to prefer smaller women with good curves, not equivalent or bigger. Dimorphism is the whole point.

    Like

    • Pwn says:

      Since you seem to have reading problems, CH laments that long legged women have smaller tits and asses relatively to their bodies, not that he loves tall women. Tall women having long legs is incidental.

      In reality, men are programmed to love teenage girls who embody both curves and long legs because the legs grow before the torso. Out of the height of teenage women, legs are a bigger part on average than for older girls.

      FYI, it’s hilarious to tell women they peak at 18.

      Liked by 1 person

    • ML says:

      Actually, the blogger has a well-known aversion to women a pound over ideal BMI, hence his “cross to bear” remark.

      I definitely love teenagers but hate long legs. Short & zapftig is my ideal.

      Like

      • Scanman says:

        It’s zaftig… a MOT that misspells his Yiddish? Oy vey!

        Like

      • ML says:

        Actually I speak German, and I can’t believe I did that. But of course in the paranoid shitbag alt-right mind, that’s PROOOOOOF of being a JEEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

        Like

      • Scanman says:

        Haha

        Perhaps you were thinking of a pig when you typed it and that’s how the p got in there?

        That’s the image that pops into my mind when I see or hear that word…

        Like

      • ML says:

        Yea you got me, man, I fuck pigs. Actual pigs — like your mother.

        Like

      • Scanman says:

        You’re a sensitive fellow, huh?

        Less soy and give those anal fissures some time to heal… You’ll be right as rain in no time.

        Like

    • “Men are selected to prefer smaller women with good curves”

      Like

      • Nads says:

        Tom Arnold quote when Roseanne said he had a small unit:

        “even a 747 looks small inside the grand canyon.”

        Liked by 2 people

      • Xtrabeing says:

        Lord Obvious, you please X with your charmingly intense — BUT EVER SADLY MISPLACED (!) — seethingly vicious Jew-mosity (animos ….)

        Contemplate on those X-words for a placid and tranquil few seconds when in near-future you’re automatically knocking some of my most valuable far-future allies. Really, allies are allies, and tits are tits *singing along now* and I’m gonna be motherfuvkin soo rich SOOOOOOOO MY LITTLE ODDITY . ..

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Cheer up, DSoK, Muh Labia likes y’all nice & small – he’ll tap it with his tiny little circumcised clit.

        Like

      • Xtrabeing says:

        I should be insulting you for devoting the kind of time to your jpegs that normal men devote to building actual financial careers, Oddity, but in a way I kinda admire your blunt, dumb, agonizingly misplaced persistence.

        Carry on, my Lord. Carry on.

        Like

      • Xtrabeing says:

        Oh, by the way, Obvious and all other (former) fuckheads to me, are you aware, yet, that the tide is turning against (ALL) you and toward (ME BY MYSELF) X??

        I said in two months I’ll be the charming sweetheart of this forum.

        I now revise it to two weeks. You might want to consider that all when you call me by the charmingly original name “fag.” Is that ALL you can say? That’s honestly your “big gun”? Anyway, after I’ve slapped a few wrists I’ll return to posting on my cunt experiences and alt-right favorites. Superior-haters.

        Like

      • ML says:

        For fuck’s sake … he’s right.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Oh, by the way, Obvious and all other (former) fuckheads to me, are you aware, yet, that the tide is turning against (ALL) you and toward (ME BY MYSELF) X??

        As it has been said, more powerful than the march of armies in an idea whose time has come.

        :EXTEMELY LARGE DUCKFACE

        I said in two months I’ll be the charming sweetheart of this forum.

        Half the battle was already won on your first post, toots.

        Like

  7. plumpjack says:

    tall women are good for displaying a man’s high status. small women don’t add as much to a man’s public appearance, but they tend to hold up better, have sweeter dispositions, and can be easier companions, generally.

    and tall women tend to have large, unattractive, prehensile-looking feet. when you spend a lot of time naked with a woman, ugly flippers take a toll on your lust for her.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Scanman says:

      Hahaha. Truth.

      I’ve programmed myself not to look. My ex was 5’10”. Attractive woman. Feet like bear paws. *shudder*

      Like

    • Xtrabeing says:

      Plumpjack’s — by far — my favorite commentator. Plumpjack’s the man. Some say he has an IQ 150. Some say 160. Whatever, he sneezes more brain cells on his computer screen in one second than femi-cunts use in a lifetime. X.

      Like

    • farmlegend says:

      Cosign. Most bad cases of boner-killing manfeet seem to be attached to tall girls.
      Don’t look, indeed.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Carlos Danger says:

      PJ has a foot fetish too. Can’t stand big ugly fire stompers.

      Like

    • ML says:

      This doesn’t disprove your axiom, but the tallest woman I ever had — six feet — managed to have long feet that were oddly cute. Normally I’d have been ready to be repulsed, but the way she would curl up in a chair on the patio in the morning with a cigarette and coffee, toenails painted an alluring dark blue, won me over in spite of the length and veining. They were always expertly pedicures and never smelled like anything but soap, if that. Pretty much like her whole body, come to think of it.

      FUCK MAN. Where da time musheen at

      Like

      • Sentient says:

        Tell us about her shapely Adam’s Apple…

        Liked by 2 people

      • ML says:

        derp derp

        Like

      • six feet tall, long veiny feet, smoker d,ark blue toenails

        that’s a dude

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        One horse on you, MuhLabia. kek

        Like

      • ML says:

        I left out the 34CC tits, the small waist, the legs carved out of marble, the gorgeous blue eyes, the soft voice, and the love of cooking. Not that you idiots know a damned thing.

        This “gotcha” shit is really fucking lame, guys.

        Liked by 1 person

      • sure buddy

        high quality girls smoke and paint their toenails dark blue. here’s a clue, they don’t.

        those are clear signs she’s bargain basement and trying to be cool edgy or goth. probably because she knows she can’t pull off feminine and classy. that’s trash all the way dude.

        Like

      • ML says:

        You’re really the kind of guy who shits on other guys over this kind of thing on the internet. Ok. You win.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        This “gotcha” shit is really fucking lame, guys.

        What dartboard fondly considers the barbs on it’s landed missiles?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        those are clear signs she’s bargain basement and trying to be cool edgy or goth. probably because she knows she can’t pull off feminine and classy. that’s trash all the way dude.

        Let me remind you, midnight, that you’re talking to yeggs who demand sex on a second date in order to proffer a third.

        😉

        Liked by 1 person

      • haha true

        i do forget who we’re dealing with around here sometimes

        Like

      • Major7 says:

        ML – pics or it didn’t happen

        Like

      • ML says:

        No way. It’s kind of a cherished time in my life, in spite of how terrible she turned out to be. I don’t need anyone making pointy elbow remarks. She used to comment here actually, many many years ago.

        Like

      • skorzecin150 says:

        Good thing you’re taller at 6’2″, being a nordic slav with a harem of HB9’s after all.

        Like

      • @ML

        you balk at my comments about her being a smoker and the ugly polish on her toes but she turned out to be terrible.

        wasn’t trying to bust your chops man, but signs like that are worth paying attention to.

        they are tells that a girl has problems and isn’t good LTR material. i’ve found myself in bad relationships with shitty girls by not paying attention to the signs. that’s why i’m here.

        key is to not deny signs of degeneracy and damage and get better at not wasting your time on girls who aren’t worth it.

        Like

      • ML says:

        I balked because I said she was the tallest I’ve been with, not that she was perfect. Far from it. Then you called me a fag for finding her awkwardly big feet cute. If you don’t want a bad reaction, don’t bust balls over nothing. Sure, I saw all the signs, I’m not stupid, but have you never let it play out because it was a good time?

        But hey it’s fine, I do my share of provoking here. 😉 Cheers

        Liked by 2 people

    • bolg says:

      “how tall are you?”
      “175”
      “good, i don’t like to bend down”.

      on tall chicks.

      Like

  8. elmertjones says:

    At 6’3″ was pleasantly surprised how tall gals made for good dance partners.

    Like

  9. Ass + tits > legs.

    My last few lays have taken several dates. Is this normal? I’ve never gone longer than two dates before this stretch. The women have been over 30, which may be a factor.

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      you might be entering the “knowing too much” zone.

      one thought I’ve had about this is that getting laid is easier when one knows juuust enough about women to play along with their self-delusion, but not so much that you can see what base creatures they are beyond the attraction, where you’re sitting there wondering why you can’t just TAKE them, since that’s what they ultimately want anyway. you start to lose patience with the tediousness of playing along, and that makes you difficult for her to read.

      but here’s another thought. assuming you have a decent look about you, your knowledge of game puts you in the top .001% of men she’s likely to encounter, maybe in her entire life. this makes you a “catch”. so now she has to think very carefully, “jeez, I really want to fuck this guy, but i really like him and he’s not a disposable fucktoy like the other guys I’ve been fucking. if I put out too soon he might think (translation: know) I’m a slut. oth, if I don’t put out soon enough he’ll move on.” etc. etc. blah blah blah. doesn’t matter. you already know the story.

      point is, three dates? five? one? what’s the difference? the long game is where it’s at anyway. and if she’s over thirty, who cares? time is on your side.

      pj

      Liked by 1 person

      • trav777 says:

        the difference between 3 and 5 dates is two dates which is too long. Even 3 dates is too many. Women need to EARN a second date and a third and keep earning subsequent ones. Part of earning that is giving me what I want.

        Liked by 2 people

      • plumpjack says:

        @trav

        good point. I’d forgotten that guys actually take girls out on traditional “dates”. I stopped doing that years ago. now it’s “hanging out”, preferably at her place or mine.

        if she wants an actual “date” then I’m okay with that, but she’s going to have to set the whole thing up because I am really too busy for that kind of charity.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        “dates”, ie., showing a willingness to invest in her pussy, when she’s been giving it away for free for years, is one of those vestiges from blue pill times. “hanging out” is more tactical and better suited to these times.

        women wanted their sexual freedom? fine. adios, romance!

        Liked by 3 people

      • ML says:

        If a girl wants a real date in 2017, and isn’t just working a scarcity model as trav puts it below, I’d have to view it as a quaint, retrograde sensibility that ought to be humored.

        But again there are just two possibilities here: either she’s been stuffed for too long and wants meals now, or she hasn’t been stuffed much at all and is still careful about it. If the latter, why not?

        Liked by 1 person

      • For the last notch we banged on date three, and I was severely irritated by that point. For the new girl, date three is tomorrow. I’m unsubtly arranging the meet-up across the street from my place.

        This is just drinks, I’m not taking these women out for dinner or conversing with them between meetings.

        My game is okay, and we made out on the first date each time. Which makes the “not yet” crap on a second date more annoying.

        Sample size of only two girls, but it’s been back-to-back.

        Like

      • ML says:

        I’ve been exactly there. Don’t dismiss it as a coincidence: these are market forces at work reflected in their increasingly stingy attitudes. It’s just getting worse out there in general. But at this point, you’re well within your rights as a PUA to ask her back to your place after the first fucking drink, or foregoing that step altogether and asking her to come to your place. Tactical matter though.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        @cavoritegroup

        another thing to consider is whether/how much you’re interested in these girls. not that it matters to YOU, but it matters to THEM.

        the aloofness of a gamemeister is potent, and girls on the downhill side of their beauty trajectory can be acutely aware of when a guy is “meh…” about them. it gives them night sweats and chills.

        these girls might be playing it out to see if there’s a future-cat-lady’s chance in hell that she can hook you. if she thinks she can’t, she’ll put you on ice in order to save her stress-fractured ego.

        that said, younger women don’t suffer from this, but you do have to contend with the flakiness that comes from their having infinity options.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I insist on an old fashioned date and waiting a bit too. You can tell a lot from how a woman eats, treats waiters and orders food. You guys tag a lot of ass I wouldn’t touch with a 60 bar. Blue toenails are fugly. Green, white, and yellow too. Looks like death or a reptile. They need to be warm red to lighter orange tones.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Mr Meaner says:

        “if she wants an actual “date” then I’m okay with that, but she’s going to have to set the whole thing up because I am really too busy for that kind of charity.”

        COTW

        Liked by 1 person

      • Mr Meaner says:

        I’ve been having a bit of success lately on the apps with direct sexual openers. Nothing crass or lame, just, basically, do you wanna have sex?

        Some say a straight out yes, some say no, some don’t reply, but most say something like “I love your honesty, tell me a bit more.”

        Then you get to comfort building within the frame of you’re the sex guy. Once you’ve got that established, say what you want. “Yeah you can be little spoon and we can get food too bla bla bla…”

        When a woman tells me in 2017 “you’re hard to read” I know it’s because I’m giving her mixed alpha fux beta bux signals.

        That sort of push-pull is fine after the bang (if you good at dealing with the drama) but before the bang I find it works against me and make things unneccesarily difficult.

        I don’t think they need plausible deniability as much as they used to 15 years ago. What they need is the green light that you’re alpha fux.

        Tinder and other similar apps have created that effect in the marketplace.

        Like

    • Sentient says:

      “The women have been over 30, which may be a factor.”

      See Blackdragon’s blog, Rollo Tomassi “Epiphany Girls”

      Like

    • ML says:

      My money is on “over 30” as the problem. Older women, or women with too much experience at any age, paradoxically try to raise the cost of sex simply because they’re tired or regretful of having ridden the carousel with such abandon. They’re incapable of understanding that suddenly imposing a waiting period doesn’t make them worth the wait — as if they were virgins — because no one told them that slutting around lowers their value permanently.

      I still feel slightly bad for these women: they at least retain some conscience in this matter. But it doesn’t mean they’re worth it. What’s fucked can’t be unfucked.

      Liked by 3 people

      • trav777 says:

        have seen this 1000 times. You’re exactly correct.

        They realize that putting out isn’t getting them anywhere so they try a scarcity model, to trick you into thinking it’s “worth it.” A female version of game actually. You shouldn’t fall for it anymore than they should fall for the male version. It’s using trickery to fake a high market value…it’s a sham.

        most of that 30+ poon is good stuff sure but it’s not worth the extra time and effort by any stretch because the woman it’s attached to is increasingly toxic once the age starts with a 3. Run for the hills if she’s maternity signalling with her dog.

        But hey, men try game to quite literally *artificially* inflate their own SMV. What’s the problem with a 30+ ho tryin the same tactic? Men don’t get that a feather boa and pretending to be cool don’t actually make you such, so what’s the issue if women don’t get that imposing a waiting period doesn’t make them worth it either? Both sides are selling something…

        Like

      • ML says:

        I mean if you genuinely like them, it’s ok to wait til the second date, even third if (and only if) the delay is circumstantial. But not if it’s a matter of “I’m ashamed of all that rando cock, need investment now.”

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        The fact that the guy’s over 30 certainly doesn’t help matters, either.
        Gets very, very rapidly much, much more difficult from there on down……

        Like

      • Democritus says:

        @trav777

        [Run for the hills if she’s maternity signalling with her dog.]

        Or just run like hell anywhere you are.

        Such an emotionally degenerative fixation can metastasize itself into all sorts of twisted behavior; and does so exponentially with age.

        The other day I saw a scrawny old woman pushing a sprightly little chihuahua down the street in one of those modern, jacked-up baby strollers, on a bright, sunny afternoon as if it were the most ordinary thing in the world. The chihuahua was perched at attention, with its fore paws resting dogfully on the bow of the stroller, like some proud little captain of the concrete as the old woman stoically labored aft at standard speed.

        Oh, but there are strong discords in the Music of our Spheres, gentlemen, strong discords, indeed.

        Like

  10. Greg Eliot says:

    ‘Tis better to have loved a short girl, than never to have loved a tall.

    Liked by 4 people

  11. I find it mystifying that men here waste so much time searching for needles in a haystack (slender, attractive American women with decent attitudes) when they can go east and find plenty of this:

    Liked by 3 people

    • I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: POLISH W0M3N ARE THE BOMB!

      Like

    • Here’s a tall one for you:

      Like

    • Random Guy says:

      Partly it’s ego; they don’t want to feel like they “have” to do it.

      Though it seems like more people will go for Asian instead of East-European which is weird if you think about it…..

      Partly just left over patriotism I suppose, still want an American women first.

      But your right and it’s something I’ve been thinking about more over the years, almost kind of like the Asian scenario.

      Sure the elite of white/American women are pretty much the best but the elite compromises less than .001% of the population whereas by dating out of the country/out of the race, you dramatically up your odds of getting something better than the obese, blue haired tatted up whores that compromise so much of our population now.

      Which is kind of ironic(?) I guess, East European women are educated, speak a few different languages, more traditional, probably better in bed, and notably less likely to divorce you.

      And they try “way” harder in how they dress and with their looks.

      It’s kind of the struggle learn game or just get a Eastern-European Bride?

      Hell; at this point game feels more like something I’m doing for myself and for internal growth than just to get laid.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Sure the elite of white/American women are pretty much the best

        Can’t agree. Elegant Eastern European women for the win. We are a trash culture and it really shows in our women.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I am very happy after eleven years and when I hear most of you talk, especially so.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Hmmmmmm, could it be you’re trying to turn us against our own women? why would you do thaaaaaaaaaaat?

        Like

      • Random Guy says:

        Turn “us” against our own women?

        Not really; if I ever do bite the bullet and date out whether nationally or racially, don’t want any more competition than I have to.

        This is more about justifying my wounded ego than anything else I suppose.

        Like

    • Major7 says:

      I see Sanpaku, but damn it’d be worth it.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Because shitty women (and shitskins) should be the ones driven out of the country, not me.

      Like

    • Vagina dominator says:

      I don’t think you’re taking into account the manscaping and making up to get him looking like that.

      Like

  12. farmlegend says:

    FWIW B/O my observations – tall, long legged girls are usually not terribly proficient at fucking while they’re on top. It’s like, whattya do with all that leg?

    Small, petite girls are best at this. Or maybe they’ve just had more practice at it.

    Like

    • Alex says:

      The difficult part about banging very tall girls when they’re on top is straining your neck back to kiss them.

      It’s also sometimes awkward doing them from behind sometimes; you have to spread their knees wider to get their pussies low enough to plow effectively.

      I’m 6’1; have enjoyed a handful of women from 5’10” to 6’2″. None are in my top 5 all-time lays.

      But they did look great in short skirts.

      Liked by 2 people

  13. OldFart says:

    Is there any way to block certain users in the comments section? If not, we need one ASAP.

    Like

    • Xtrabeing says:

      If you were any more boring, I’d be flat-lining in front of my computer screen with distended diarrhea dribbling out of my Open-Mouth-Shocked anus. Pls step up your commenting game. X.

      P.S. Closed minds are probably responsible for 99% of the boring mouths in the world. By the way, LOVE your handle. *laugh laugh*

      Like

      • OldFart says:

        This is how I picture you when every fucking comment you make is boils down to a “look at meeee!!” cry.

        Like

    • ML says:

      I’m being charitable and assuming he has Captain Oblivious in mind.

      Like

    • Major7 says:

      Go ahead and say it, OldFart , you’re talking about SorceryGod/XWarper/Xtraflavor.

      Problem is, he’d just come up with another stupid handle from another website he created during his break at Kinko’s, and we’d have to start all over not reading his fagtalk.

      By the way, that picture is EXACTLY how I picture him.

      Like

  14. Tall men who reproduce with short women are tantamount to race mixers.

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      not necessarily…

      #epigenetics

      Liked by 1 person

    • “Tall men who reproduce with short women are tantamount to race mixers.”

      This.

      Like

    • the dumb is strong with you. so you’re saying me, 6’4″, mixing it up with w1f3, 5’2″, is the equivalent of making niglets due to jungle fever?! SMH

      Liked by 2 people

      • ML says:

        Purity spiralling is autism, but there is an argument to be made against mixing very divergent phenotypes. Height is highly polygenic: slightly more alleles control for it than skin color, in fact (400+ vs. +/-380, or something). Anytime you mix extreme variations of polygenic traits, you’re opening the door onto phenotypic novelties. Say for example the father is 6’3″ and the mother 5’3″, it’s possible they inherit genes for a long torso but shorter legs, etc.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        At 6’4″, you shouldn’t be dating any chick much shorter than 5’10”.

        Tall dudes with short chicks is Race Treason.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Also keep in mind that short chicks literally mate upward. It’s been observed here before that being 5’2″ makes them even crazier for a man who is 6’2″, when you would think they’d aim closer to home. But as they climb up to you genetically, you may climb down.

        Like

      • according to charts at pediatric office my son will be at least 5’11 given his current growth at 9-yo; my daughter who’s 22 months YOUNGER than him is JUST AS TALL as he is. people always think they’re twins. oh, and her legs are already stupid long compared to the rest of her body. i would post pics but meh…

        Like

      • Random Guy says:

        Eh….you have to realize he probably looks at it as some form of self-sabotage.

        Why would a tall guy want to make potential children at a height of 5″2, that’s a pretty serious loss of SMV there guy.

        That and if he’s short it probably gets to him, he can’t get the tall women and the short women while hot are still going to be pumping out short children for him in all likely hood.

        And now they can’t even get that because guys like you are swooping in and taking all the good women both short and tall.

        Or maybe he’s some kind of Eugenics/White Purity guy, looks at what you are doing as bad for the race.

        Though if you get with “both” tall and short women it’s arguably spreading yours and improving the race by pushing out the weaker genes.

        So I guess make it up to the guy by sleeping around and having lots of kids.

        Like

      • Major7 says:

        “At 6’4″, you shouldn’t be dating any chick much shorter than 5’10”.

        Tall dudes with short chicks is Race Treason.”

        But CO, what if you’re nuts over her?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I see what you did there, Major7… most droll. (golf clap)

        Like

    • that’s idiotic. it’s not always in a person’s best interest to be super tall. especially for girls. tall is good for a lot of things but there are health problems associated with being tall that average people don’t have. they also die at earlier ages on average.

      we also need some people who aren’t giants to do jobs that are easier to do for average and smaller people.

      just like it’s good for shorter people of the same ethnicity to mate with taller people, it’s also good for taller to mate up with shorter. balances things out so we don’t end up with a bunch of freaks.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Tall White people are very rare in all of recorded history.

        We are Race PRESERVATIONISTS.

        Race ECOLOGISTS.

        Race ENVIRONMENTALISTS.

        Beautiful, tall, long-legged blond & red-headed White women with yuuggge titties must not perish from this Earth.

        Liked by 1 person

      • elmertjones says:

        You are correct Sir. The world is made for shorter people. I could never be a fighter pilot and for ground combat would be the biggest target on the battlefeld.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “The world is made for shorter people.”

        All the more reason to work to PRESERVE the unique height & length & beauty of the White Race.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        You want the infinite Beauty of the White Race to devolve into this?

        Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Tall men who reproduce with short women are tantamount to race mixers.

      Damn, man… let’s not go crazy now.

      We can’t all be tall like Hitler, slim like Goering, and blond like Goebbels.

      But we can still be White, amirite?

      FWIW, my father was 6′ 2″, mom was 5′ 4″, and I wound up just a literal fraction of an inch shorter than dad.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Ironsides says:

        I just noticed your second line. “Slim like Goering” really cracked me up.

        Like

      • skorzecin150 says:

        I’m 6’3″, wife is 5’2″, both my sons topped out at 6’2″. Which they hate, and I lol. Older one IS on a basketball scholarship, for all the good it will do him in the long run, as he has a freakish vertical leap. State highjump champ in his earlier days. My old man was 5’7″ in his jackboots, but both my mom, and my wife’s, were relatively tall for the time when they were younger, and both had long legs.

        So there’s more in play than just the straight up pairing.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Good on ya, skorzy!

        Like

      • elmertjones says:

        Goering was fat partly because he got shot in the groin during a Nazi street brawl. Somehow he managed to father a child after that but it affected his weight.

        Like

    • hard9bf says:

      “Tall men who reproduce with short women are tantamount to race mixers.”

      Spoken like a bitter shorty. Sorry, brah, but that 5’1″ cutie wants a 6’3″ stud, not a 5’4″ twerp, no matter how ‘ripped’ you be.

      Liked by 1 person

      • hard9bf says:

        And a pro tip, pace the Cap’n:

        Tall girls are lonely because their options are limited — so, paradoxically, a tall girl will be more receptive to shorty 5’4″ than that 5’1″ cutie. Is a shorty with a tall girl tantamount to race mixing? Holla back.

        Liked by 1 person

      • besides, the empowering / submissing dynamic is more pronounced when a 5’2″ petite cutie bonds with 6’4″ stud 😉 it’s projected outward in public and inward in the bedroom 😀
        hard for a 5’2″ 100lbs girl to feel dominated by 5’5″ 130lbs guy… in bed 😉

        Liked by 1 person

      • i’m 6’2″. i’ve always had the most fun and best chemistry with the little ones.

        it’s not just the size either.

        most of them seem to have better personalities than tall girls too. probably due to lower testosterone, more estrogen. almost always fun, bubbly, and energetic. sweet little voices and giggles too. being around that makes you feel alive. makes the drudgery of life a lot easier when you have that to look forward to too.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Publius says:

        Who nigger this is?

        Like

    • Ironsides says:

      At this point, I’d say “having white kids at all” is several parsecs more important than worrying about minutiae of height.

      A short or average height white man who’s actually born is worth 10 tall white men who aren’t.

      I don’t think there are enough tall white women to be choosy at this point. The main criteria are, “is white, and is willing to reproduce.” Anything else is window dressing for a less catastrophic hour.

      Genes are weird, anyway. My paternal grandfather who fought the Japanese was 5′ 3″, and my thot of a grandmother was about 5′ 1″. My father is 6′ 4″. I’m 5′ 11″. Total chaos.

      Liked by 4 people

      • good nutrition probably played a big part in your father and you being taller than your grandparents. they were probably struggling to stay well nourished when they were kids. people forget how much that matters.

        i think we talked about it awhile back how even though there’s a big push for people to eat less meat and dairy but eat more fruits, vegetables and grains, european people evolved to be bigger stronger and taller than all other races because they’ve always eaten a lot more meat dairy and less vegetation. you couldn’t get fresh fruits and vegetables year round like in warmer climates so they ate what they could and are better for it.

        even an average height guy with a shortish girl can have decent height kids if they feed them right during their youth.

        getting enough protein and fat lets your muscles and brain develop properly. you get more muscle mass from eating that way too. even without any exercise, people who eat mostly proteins and goods fats have more muscle than people eat low protein high veg and carb. more muscle mass means stress on bones so they keep bulking and growing to meat the needs of the muscles and tendons. all good things for kids.

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        Good point on the diet.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Chill guys I’m trolling. But the guy with the oompa loompa wife is still a basically a n166er lover 😀 And women who are much shorter than average are not attractive

      Like

  15. Sentient says:

    Forgive the OT…. everything in one post/

    Pure cohencidence… time series

    The Case for Reparations, by Ta-Nehisi Coates

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/

    The cost of slavery reparations is now within the boundaries of the politically acceptable

    *https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/09/29/the-cost-of-slavery-reparations-is-now-within-the-boundaries-of-the-politically-acceptable/?utm_term=.964b00774111

    Charlottesville Showing Up for Racial Justice chapter holds conversation on reparations

    *http://www.cavalierdaily.com/article/2017/03/charlottesville-showing-up-for-racial-justice-chapter-holds-conversation-on-reparations

    St. Louis’ Black Aldermanic Caucus Calls for Slavery Reparations

    *https://www.riverfronttimes.com/newsblog/2017/06/14/st-louis-black-aldermanic-caucus-calls-for-slavery-reparations

    Until the playing field has been leveled, I will not be satisfied

    *http://www.bnd.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article163793513.html

    A new concept of reparations

    *http://baystatebanner.com/news/2017/jul/27/new-concept-reparations/

    Amazon Developing Slavery Reparations Series ‘Black America’ From Will Packer, Aaron McGruder

    *http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/amazon-slavery-reparations-series-black-america-will-packer-aaron-mcgruder-1202512379/

    A Global Summit Is Needed to Address Reparations for Slavery and Colonialism

    *http://observer.com/2017/08/united-states-reparations-slavery-colonialism/

    Charlottesville VA Backs “Reparations” Fund for Black Residents & Votes to Sell Robert E. Lee Statue

    *https://www.democracynow.org/2017/8/7/charlottesville_va_backs_reparations_fund_for

    CHARLOTTESSVILLE 8/12/17

    Ta-Nehisi Coates on How Cities & Municipalities Are Winning Reparations for Slavery at Local Level

    *https://www.democracynow.org/2017/8/15/ta_nehisi_coates_on_how_cities

    Like

    • Wild Man says:

      This reparation thing presupposes a methodology of backwardization business case analysis. If that is done accurately, the black demographic is not gonna come out on top of such analysis.

      So, if this reparations thing gets any traction – that is stupid and should be called out as very very stupid. Perhaps bringing the public’s attention to this, will tend towards another way to disassemble the flaws apparent in the ‘white privilege’ concept, for those among us that are too dumb to see through it’s flaws in the first place. I predict the call for reparations will backfire, but alot of people are gonna lose their shit in the process of it backfiring.

      Like

      • Wild Man says:

        “lose their shit’ as in freakout.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Drawing attention to it will have zero effect, which is why the only attention it receives is here in the “far-right” doldrums. No one is listening to this anymore. They don’t care. The future is gibs and more gibs, and anything less is Nazi.

        Like

      • Wild Man says:

        ML – what are gibs?

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        “Gibsmedats” = “give me that” = handouts.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Gibsmedats — nominalized form of “gib me dat”, i.e. benefits and hand-outs. I was going to direct you to therightstuff.biz lexicon, where I believe it was invented, but the site is down!

        My point is that whoever was willing to listen to these expose’s has been phased out or gone the way of the herd out of fear. The other side is literally the majority, which is why they’re winning. No one in the American political scene even comes close to the balls it would take to impose limits on the “spic-nig cycle”. No one anywhere, really.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I think that is changing as people realize they will be a victim if they don’t start getting these coons and commies back in order. These monuments and the abject ignorance and stupidity on display over them over the last years has hardened my heart. I want them gone yesterday and never to return. I am sure I am not alone.

        Like

    • Monuments coming down, history getting erased, “dissidents” being rounded up, both online and in the real world. C’ville showed that they’re basically moving to criminalize being White. Reparations (which already exist in the form of affirmative action, section 8, EBT, and various federal grants/largesse for anything blak) is the next move. What then? Seizing private White-owned land and property? Good thing you lads have the 2A. And Trump.

      Like

      • Anonymous White Male says:

        Nigs have been getting reparations for over 50 years now. Getting reparations and gibs is just the next step. Got to have an excuse to print paper into circulation. Or, to put pluses and minuses into circulation.

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        All that stands in the way of eminent domain being used to expropriate land from white land-owners and the like is one Supreme Court justice. If we get two, we might not find ourselves in South Africa quite so suddenly, though socially, at this point, there’s hardly any difference left.

        Liked by 1 person

      • elmertjones says:

        Corporations profiting from the Agro-EBT Complex must staff their organizations with minorities in at least the same proportion as public assistance recipients. Genius T. Coates’s prescient insights about black bodies are funny cause they are true!

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I’d be all in favor of reparations if, upon receiving them, n1ggers would shut up once and for all, and the slate would be considered clean.

        But since we know that’s never going to happen, Whites have two choices…. kowtow like we’ve been doing for the past 50 years and accelerate the decline… or use this issue as the long-overdue line in the sand… “this far and no further”, in no uncertain terms… and if you mean to have a war, then let it start here.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        JIDF We believe in direct action both to eradicate the problems we face online and to create the publicity that will cause those with the power to take action (companies like Facebook and Google) to do the right thing.

        Like

      • SteveRogers42 says:

        Like

    • California Proposes Jail Time for Using the Wrong Pronoun for Transgenders http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3578131/posts

      Like

      • Xtrabeing says:

        That makes my blood boil.

        It’s a power grab, pure and simple. Look through the “respect” veneer for “different-others.” All it is, all it REALLY is, It’s a way of lording it over alt-rights and centrists and saying, in essence, “Naah naah WE RULE YOU WE ARE THE RULERS.”

        I know power. I love power. I’m bending this forum to my will using mind-power. I recognize it even in limp-wristed pieces of shit like “run” California.

        I’m coming after them. You all doubt, but I’m going to do my utmost to WIPE THEM OFF THE FACE OF THE MAP.

        Like

      • Xtrabeing says:

        I … am … The … FUTURE.

        Like

      • Major7 says:

        You… are… a… troll.

        Like

  16. 5’2″, 100lbs, perky B’s, mmmm mmmm mmmm…

    Like

    • Xtrabeing says:

      Hey, CBR!!! I haven’t talked to you since my Sorcerygod days. How’s the wife? I always liked you, no probs. And unlike the fuckheads here, you don’t seem to jump on me for having confidence and, even, arrogance.

      Hope we can chat more in the future. X. (I gotta get my red Ducati soon.)

      Like

  17. Tiberius says:

    I like to use slim, small, girls like a fleshlight

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Waffles says:

    One thing I find hilarious now, looking back is that you could make a case that 95% of the girls in my HS were bangable. Where a 15-16 year old me would have put that number below 50% possibly much lower. Youth trumps all. I say that now like it is some great surprise, but at that age I couldn’t see it, staring me right in the face, day by day, minute by minute.

    Liked by 1 person

    • itsme says:

      the older men get, the more attractive younger women become.

      it’s a blessing and a curse

      Liked by 1 person

    • Random Guy says:

      Depending on how long ago it was; you may simply be looking at things from a perspective of “now” versus then.

      If so; well ya that’s going to change your perspective with how chunky ladies be gettin’.

      But there’s also the general environmental factor, the more your area has hotties the less “hot” those hotties become.

      The best looking women in every small town in America moves to LA and becomes just your average woman there.

      Or as itsme said; could be an age thing. The older you get; the more youth means.

      It could even be a self-esteem thing, when you were younger didn’t have as much of a sense of self-worth and so “only the best would do” and everything else seemed degrading because your ID was on unstable grounds.

      Now that you may have gained self-worth you don’t mind going for the HB7’s or 6’s anymore.

      Like

  19. Jim says:

    I’ve always liked girls on the smaller side. But I was with a tall girl about two weeks ago who was 5’11” and it was like a revelation! The first time in as long as I can remember that I didn’t have to lean down at all to kiss her.

    She ended it because she couldn’t stand “being the other woman,” and I can’t blame her. But I’ve been talking today with another girl who’s 5’9″ and I’ve got high hopes…

    Like

    • Vagina dominator says:

      Does anyone notice any difference in the size of their holes? Is that an important factor?

      Like

  20. M4rkyboy says:

    Is this even open for debate? Nothing tops the tall skinny girl. You can apple pie cuddle your little munchkin all you want but i’ll wrap myself in supermodel splendour with slender arms and swan necks till the fucking cows come home.

    Like

  21. bluegrass577 says:

    I prefer shorter people myself. Tall is nice if it’s in proportion, but tall people are more likely to be malproportioned. I’m a case in point but that’s besides the point. You’re right, taller women are more likely to lack feminine curves.

    Liked by 2 people

  22. Sentient says:

    http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread391164/pg1


    Weights and Heights of playboy playmates and models

    As a hobby about ten years ago, I started to track the weight and height of women in playboy and the playboy newsstand specials. I have a lot data samples of height and weights of playmates and models.

    No matter what issue I use as a sample, I get the same number. The average is 5′ 5″ at 114 pounds.

    In fact, the current PMOY of October 2008 is 5′ 5″ 115 pounds.

    There could be some sort of Gaussian explanation behind this , or, the number could be based on Hugh Hefner’s own height.

    I also noticed that many adult film stars are also 5′ 5″. What’s the deal?

    Like

    • it’s because they are the perfect size and proportions for most men. they are average. extremes on both end of the spectrum are a problem and body proportions start to get weird in most people who are super tall or super short.

      also the popularity of really tall models is only for high fashion. not bikini models, porn, or anything men like to watch. that’s because they are built like big skinny dudes and the clothes hang on them like hangers. also, because gay men run the fashion industry.

      Liked by 3 people

      • ML says:

        exactly.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        You do realize in a photo of a single subject they could be ANY height…

        It is because of the proportions.

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        Fair point. So it comes down to whoever is selecting the models. But unless it’s one man, we can assume that instinctive preferences are at work.

        I mean look, there are more men under six feet than over it, so they’re not going to throw themselves at taller women as the attrition rate is notoriously higher — precisely because women want taller, be they 5’2″ or 6’2″, in heels or out.

        Like

      • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

        It’s strictly because short girls make the tits look bigger and hips look more curvy.

        I had an old girlfriend that was 5’11” and 36-24-36. Those same measurements on a 5’2″ girl would be WOW, on a six footer just looks normal.

        Like

    • farmlegend says:

      My hypothesis is that the height bell curve for women is narrower (less flat) than it is for men. It sometimes seems like 80% of adult women are between 5’4″ and 5’6″. Men, likely a flatter bell curve, with more outliers.

      Much like men purportedly having a flatter IQ bell curve.

      Liked by 2 people

      • ML says:

        The simplest explanation, which can be found in any old study or book on natural selection, is that height is not a criterion of selection for men as it is for women, which is true for many species. As we all know, men want fertility, and “tall” doesn’t mean “fertile”; but “tall” might mean “ready to give me shit” if you’re a woman.

        This ties in with the human male’s level of investment in offspring, which is abnormal in animals generally: a shorter female is more reminiscent of a child, so it probably draws on whatever prompts the male to care for offspring.

        There’s also the probability that a smaller female simply makes the male feel bigger, which increases testosterone and semen production.

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        Oh, I forgot: shorter women also have more children. Probably this is because there’s more estrogen at work than in taller women, so by selecting shorter women, who will tend to have better fertility cues, men are shooting for more offspring.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bluegrass577 says:

        I think you’re right about these claims. In general, I have heard that men are more variant in many qualities. However, this notion disagrees with a hunch that I have long held, which is that men are more homogeneous in attractiveness than women (so, the curve for male attractiveness is taller and narrower than for women).

        How does this play out experientially?Well, I know a lot of guys that look very similar to men that are considered the most attractive (e.g. Brad Pitt or what have you). They’re shaped very similarly to these specimens of manhood–the only difference is that they’re a little smaller (sometimes in height, but more often simply in robustness of bone structure).

        By contrast, I feel like a slight majority of women look very, very different than the ideal woman (even allowing for some disagreement as to what it is). Their faces are very different, and often their body shape differs a lot too.

        This is one reason why I feel the notion that looks matter less in men (although it’s true) is a little glib–because perhaps looks matter less in men because they’re more homogeneous in attractiveness in women. Who knows, perhaps war resulted in only a relatively narrow band of phenotypes in men surviving relative to women. It’s like saying that while people care less about skin color than other races, while white people’s skin color also varies a lot less than most other races.

        How can we reconcile higher male variance in gross physical features with lower variance in attractiveness? I think the answer is that if certain ratios are taken in male traits, they would come out as having lower variance than in women. Thus, some male measures normalize others, and men are more in proportion, on average, than women. Just my theory, but I think I’m on to something.

        Like

    • Sentient says:

      CH – check out this silk database site…

      http://playboy.silk.co/

      Like

  23. I like taller girls, you get more of everything, the thing is that those girls are extra rare(the ones with great proportions) but when you find a 5 ft 11 girl with curves and big bum and boobs they look mighty impressive and everyone really does notice but seldom approach as they feel intimidated by her height and sheer beauty.

    Like

    • PRO-TIP: Tall girls are desperately lonely.

      You set the filter of your online dating app for chicks who are about 5’10” or taller, and you will be swimming in quality White p00ntang which will phuck your ballz right ouf of your sack.

      And give you great big strapping lumberjack/cowboys for progeny.

      Like

      • jeangray07 says:

        This is true. My roommate in college was on the basketball team and she would get genuinely upset if I even so much as spoke to a guy over 6′. Complained that I need to stick to guys closer to my height. She was very lonely, and the guys who were interested (twerpy betas wanting a Xena) weren’t the ones she wanted (those guys wanted cheerleaders, not ball players).

        Tall girls have extremely limited options, especially if they want proportion. Seems like once guys get over 6’4″, they get gangly if they don’t actively work on their physique.

        Like

    • Sentient says:

      This. Want to know who the hottest of the hot girls are? The ones other girls cannot stand to be around… and height is part of that.

      Like

    • Jim says:

      I’m 6’4″, and what I’ve found recently is that I’m automatically in the running for those girls because they have to rule out so many guys who are shorter or the same height as them.

      Seriously, I put my height in my Tinder profile and I’ve been amazed at how many responses I get that are just, “So you’re really 6’4″? ;)”

      Like

      • Sentient says:

        “relax hotpants… it’s proportional but do you measure up?”

        Like

      • ML says:

        Literally all that matters. I’ve seen the scummiest men on earth with multiple kids, sometimes by multiple women, just because they were over six feet. I mean chain-smoking, alcoholic, drug-abusing, rock-dumb white trash shitbags. One woman I knew had three kids by this type, then found out he was banging dudes on the side. So why did you have three kids with him? “He was so tall and handsome.” I.e., he was tall. Women are mentally disabled by male height.

        Like

  24. Heinrich says:

    The enemy is tainting this blog like never before. It is obvious to me, that they are scared. It is their last stand. Truth-loving men will make the world human once again.

    Liked by 1 person

    • ML says:

      REEEEE TOO MANY PEOPLE DISAGREE WITH MY PETTY OBSESSIVE JUDEOCENTRIC WORLDVIEW REEEEEEEEEEE

      Like

    • Sentient says:

      Absolutely right Heinrich. They are everywhere now, all the boards. defcon 3.

      Like

      • ML says:

        By the same token, you “OMG JEWS ARE EVERYWHERE!!!!” trolls are also everywhere now. I was browsing a subreddit on canning vegetables and saw ((( ))) after someone quoted a recipe from Sandor Katz. I wonder if you’re capable of suspending belief for a moment and just considering the possibility that all the people disagreeing with you, whom you need to dismiss as Jews, are not: how do you think this makes you look? paranoid, loony perhaps? Could it be you populating the internet with Jeeeeewwwws?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        One of the take-it-to-the-bank responses you can always… well… take to the bank… is this “just because I disagree” canard.

        We’ve said innumerable times, it’s not the disagreement, it’s the tone, manner, and often subject of said disagreements that cause the various forms of shill radar to light up the screen.

        C. S. Lewis has a pthy remark in his Screwtape Letters about how one of the tells of who’s winning the battle of any particular individual’s soul is how they don’t “hear themselves”, and while picking up on every nuance in the other person’s tone and words in which they take all offense, both real and imagined, they themselves always demand to be judged merely by their words alone.

        On a side note, I HIGHLY recommend that book for some true insights on Christianity the way it’s supposed to be.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Carlos Danger says:

        It’s also true about normie sites like Real Politics. Troll activity is up 300% in my estimate. Almost no one gets banned from here. You have to be really irritating first.

        Like

      • ML says:

        It’s literally alt-right trolls accusing everyone they disagree with of being Jews. Think about that.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sentient says:

        Seems only Jews get riled up by being called Jews…

        Like

      • Major7 says:

        “Seems only Jews get riled up by being called Jews…”

        Well said. You heebies are so damn sensitive

        Like

    • skorzecin150 says:

      @midnighttoker – Spot on. Why bother commenting at all unless the post hit some sort of mark. This ML character is just that, a played character, a parody of what a woman believes a PUA to be. Lots of BS “conquest” stories, lots of posts in general (as a woman can’t stop talking), and whilst there IS an odd nugget to be found (no-one is 100% wrong, or right, for that matter), it’s mostly gibberish. Sad!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        As sound a deconstruction as can be expected, though I rate him a bit lower for the antiWhite “all American women are trash” shtick that too many of the wrong kind of yeggs try to sell ’round chere.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Vagina dominator says:

      I’d never thought of that before. The psychic significance of vampires not appearing in mirrors. Is it bcs they don’t want to examine their own natures?

      Like

  25. ML says:

    Every fucking discussion has to be about Jews. Every fucking one. We can’t just talk about tall chicks vs short. If someone disagrees, they must be Jewish. Or gay. Or anything, because how else could someone disagree with me me me?

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Well,there is such a thing as a scroll bar, amirite?

      Like

    • Wrong Side of History says:

      I’m barely jewish at all (something great great grandmother idfk). I got a kick how everything I said on here was suddenly being dissected for hebe ulterior motives.

      rofl

      Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        Yea man. I’m at the point where I hope they “shut it down”. I don’t like being called a Nazi for being white and proud, or at least not ashamed, but I don’t like being called a Jew every time I don’t agree with some small-minded dogmatic asshole on the internet.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        At the risk of being called a Jew, I can appreciate your pain.

        Like

      • ML says:

        You straddle the fence. One day you’re rational, the next you’re calling people Jews for disagreeing with you. I dunno why, as you seem rational on the whole apart from the Christianity.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        , as you seem rational on the whole apart from the Christianity.

        See, this is what we’re talking about… couldn’t resist to get in the crack about Christianity.

        When you walk with the ducks and quack like the ducks, you’re gonna be called a duck… ducky.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Sentient says:

        “Yea man. I’m at the point where I hope they “shut it down”.”

        There you go, spoken like a right warrior for white men.

        : I’m all out a duckfaces…

        Like

      • ML says:

        If it discomfits shitbag bigots like you two? Yea, I’m all for it being shut down. Just out of spite. 100%. Call me Shlomo Bergwitzstein.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Christianity is far more rational than you realize. There is absolutely no conflict between it and science that isn’t an illusion. Another anti-logos tell. I think we worry too much about who is a loyal German and who isn’t when its obvious to most anyway.

        That said, I don’t like what has happened to my country since 1965 or any of the other manipulations of our society and cultural attacks by what is essentially an ethnic criminal mafia using foreign invaders to destroy us. I don’t hate you but I am fully aware of what you really think about us and the crimes you have committed towards that end I felt deeply betrayed when I learned this. I don’t think I can ever truly forgive and forget at this point.

        You chose to make war on us and always have. Control of the press provides you with control of the pop folklore and control over the minds of fools and savages. I resent the Central banking cabal and the efforts to destroy our economy, way of life, destruction of our universities and envious contempt for our obviously superior and richer cultural achievements and the pathological need to plunder us. I resent your weaponization of the Dindu most of all. And yes, it infuriates me to see it destroyed by people who can’t replicate it and do for spite. I will kill to preserve it when the time comes. You have brought this situation on yourselves.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Sentient says:

        Here we are now…

        If it discomfits shitbag bigots like you two? Yea, I’m all for it being shut down. Just out of spite. 100%.

        Bigots huh, for calling out the Jew? Shitbag bigots? Or shegetz bigots?

        Like

      • ML says:

        Whatever, man. This was a post about short chicks. Worthless little psychopaths.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        “Bigots” heh.

        You keep making my… and now our… points for us, Muh Labia.

        You keep using the Alinsky shaming language attempts that haven’t flown at the chateau since the first wave of (((shills))) and their useful stooges tried it.

        Learn or depart, man… a third alternative is flogging.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • ML says:

        derp derp everything is “saul alinsky” derp derp

        i remember when white nationalists hadn’t discovered alinsky, and everything was trostky

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sentient says:

        “i remember when white nationalists hadn’t discovered alinsky, and everything was trostky”

        Jews jewing Jews… You are a Jew ML.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        That “derp” thing is a very effective piece of verbal jew-jitsu.

        You should drop a line to Alinsky and have him add it to the playbook.

        :duckface

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        It is very odd that you should think it odd.

        Do you think Jews don’t have the resources to constantly monitor and manage public opinion outside the MSM they control?

        Or are they just not interested in managing public opinion?

        Internet messaging competes with MSM messaging and their entire business model. But you think they wouldn’t want to protect that?

        It is perfectly reasonable for dissenting sites to be alert to kike site management techniques.

        Now that I have explained that, you can shut up on the topic.

        Like

    • ML says:

      Yea, I’m a little tired of scrolling past dildos and Aryan maidens. You people have made every forum fucking unbearable. You, in particular, just have a truly odious amour-propre, but thanks to the (((alt-right))), a reasonable man can’t talk to people on the internet or off. If on, it’s straight into “Jews”. If off, straight into “Nazis”. And even pointing this out is Jewish, naturally.

      Now you’re going to twist every word of that to suit yourself. Everything is a canard, everything a gotcha, everyone is a Jew, everyone is inferior to you. Great. I know the script. Spare me and scroll past, yourself.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Sentient says:

        who the fuck are you (((ML))) you’ve been posting here a few weeks at most… under this nom de guerre that is… And guys have been posting here for a DECADE.

        So fuck off.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Stop your kvetching, MuhLabia… I, for one, am convinced you’re not (((tribal)))….

        … (((them))) yeggs are invariably wittier and have the best words..

        Like

      • ML says:

        You’re the shitbags obsessed with the subject. YOU stop your kvetching, you old piece of shit.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Ageism? Here at the chateau, in this, the current year?

        I’m shocked… shocked to learn!

        Like

      • jOHN MOSBY says:

        If jew no like, take a hike, you whiny kike

        Like

      • bolg says:

        jew kike. k?

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        Make your own site. Or go somewhere else. What’s the problem?

        Like

      • Democritus says:

        Oh, ML, ML…you ain’t seen nothin’ yet. Don’t complain. They’re actually going EASY on you in here; holding back, being polite, and letting you talk.

        You should’ve been here at the height of the “whorefinder” scorched-earth era.

        Say THAT name three times as you stare into the Château’s mirror.

        Things would just been getting started…

        Like

    • elmertjones says:

      I dated a tall Jewish gal. It was alright.

      Like

      • ML says:

        The girl I describe above was half Jewish. Wasn’t Semitic at all. But that doesn’t matter, because that means she’s a “crypto-Jew” who wants to “infiltrate”. Etc., etc., etc. There’s always some malicious interpretation.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Damn, man… an awful lot of “half-Jewish” and “barely Jewish at all” types, who seem to specialize in agitprop type posts, kvetching about how the rest of us yeggs keep smelling gefiltre, go figger.

        Like

      • ML says:

        derp derp everyone’s jewish derp derp derp

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I dated a Jewish gal myself once… she made this unbelievable pulled pork sandwich, swore it was kosher, I don’t know HOW she did it.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Damn, man… an awful lot of “half-Jewish” and “barely Jewish at all” types, who seem to specialize in agitprop type posts, kvetching about how the rest of us yeggs keep smelling gefiltre, go figger.

        And funny that no matter how (((small))) a drop o chosen blood, they sure make you know about it.

        Wonder why that is?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well, it ain’t like the negro one-drop rule, where you can tell right away, ya know. 😉

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        @ elmer “I dated a tall Jewish gal. It was alright.”

        Alright? Not great? Are you anti-Semitic?

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        What does “derp” mean?

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        I looked up “derp”. It is some kind of playground talk.

        Like

      • elmertjones says:

        During an evening stroll I suggested she go into business, because Jews were good at that. She became incensed. “I can’t believe you said that!”. I was baffled by her response and said “But it’s true!”. On another occasion she was aghast when we passed a gay bar and I pointed and laughed at the creepy Greco-Roman frescoes adorning the side of the building. At an arts festival we had an encounter with some “bikers” who got enraged when my car blocked them. I leaned out the window and told them to fuck off and they glared back impotently. When we got back home she exclaimed how exciting that was so I boned her. Good times.

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        So like every other woman.

        Like

    • I’ve learned in my time here that 7 out of 10 people are employed by hasbara.

      Like

      • ML says:

        That’s fucking conservative dude. The number of Jews shifts according to the mood and scope of the accuser. Anything they don’t like makes you suspect. And with the next breath, they’re sounding the alarm about muh Communists policing thoughtcrimes with scare-words. It’s the most childish, banal, insane fucking doublethink imaginable.

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        See below. QED.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        we’re probably all in the same room too. Maybe we should just go out and have coffee instead.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Oy vey, wouldn’t you just love for me to walk outside so you can take my picture!!! Nice try Jew!!!

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Only 4 out of 10. Three are sock puppies.

        Like

      • ML says:

        derp derp everyone i disagree with is jewish derp derp derp

        Like

      • skorzecin150 says:

        328 posts on this thread as I type this, NINETY-TWO posts by this “ML” schmuck. Comes out of nowhere a couple of weeks ago, and floods the board with BS. Someone has got, at least, an over inflated opinion of himself. Or maybe the JIDF does pay by the post. A shekel’s a shekel, amirite?

        Like

      • ML says:

        Honestly, I drank too much coffee today.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        “Honestly, I drank too much coffee today”

        Let me guess… Free coffee.

        Like

      • ML says:

        I mean I made it in my own espresso pot. Is this Jewish too? Derp derp

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Depends who paid for it.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Let me guess… Free coffee.

        Okay, I sniggered.

        I’ve learned in my time here that 7 out of 10 people are employed by hasbara.

        And the other half are righteous gentiles, amirite?

        Comes out of nowhere a couple of weeks ago, and floods the board with BS. Someone has got, at least, an over inflated opinion of himself.

        I told youse yeggs, when he was accusing me of egotism, it was projection. 😉

        As if I were some type of Narcissus! Hell, if I identified with any Greek character it would be Zeus.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Now you’re going to twist every word of that to suit yourself. Everything is a canard, everything a gotcha, everyone is a Jew, everyone is inferior to you. Great. I know the script.

      Oy vey, that’s SOME poisecution complex ya got there, kid.

      Like

      • Sentient says:

        So let’s change some of these words shall we? Promoting White Pride? Oh No! Shut that site down goys…

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        The Jewish Internet Defense Force (JIDF) is a private, independent, non-violent protest organization representing a collective of activists, operating under the name “Jewish Internet Defense Force” since the 2008 massacre at the Mercaz HaRav Yeshiva in Jerusalem.

        We’re on the cutting edge of pro-Israel digital online advocacy, presenting news, viewpoints, and information throughout a large network reaching hundreds of thousands via email, Facebook, YouTube, RSS feeds, Twitter, and other digital hubs to those who share our concerns for Israel and about about antisemitic and jihadist online content.

        Our ACTION ALERTS are now well known throughout the Jewish and Israel advocacy world, and by our many enemies, as they have led to the removal of thousands of antisemitic and jihadist pages online. Whether it’s an antisemitic Facebook page with millions of members, or a YouTube video promoting global jihad, our team is on it, monitoring it, and urging companies to adhere to their own rules.

        We believe in direct action both to eradicate the problems we face online and to create the publicity that will cause those with the power to take action (companies like Facebook and Google) to do the right thing.

        We work to bring together different individuals and represent the new generation of Jewish leaders, a new approach, and a real grassroots effort for change!

        The founder of the JIDF, David Appletree, was honored to speak at the WUJS Congress 2009: “Unlocking our Future”, alongside the IDF Spokesperson department. The WUJS represents 1.5 million Jewish students, worldwide. The conference was sponsored by the World Jewish Congress, World Zionist Organization, Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Israeli Knesset, and others.

        Internationally, we have consulted various government and non-governmental agencies seeking our expertise in online counter-terror ops, as well as online community building and digital strategies. Our work has been a featured throughout the international media in publications like Israel National News (Arutz Sheva), the Jerusalem Post, Washington Post, FOX, CNN, USA Today, TIME Magazine, BBC, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Telegraph UK, Jewish News Agency – Argentina, NewsRU Israel – Russia, AM 1370 Baltimore, WNWR 1540 Philadelphia, K-Talk Radio 630 Utah, Ha’aretz, GlobalTV Canada, Jewish Tribune Canadian Jewish News, and in the “Daily Alert” which is prepared for the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, and more.

        At this time, there is no official membership or dues to be a part of the JIDF. However, we welcome everyone that’s supportive of the cause and respectful of our views to join thousands of others in our various online forums (on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc.), and we certainly welcome financial support, as well.

        Imagine an Alt Right group like this… But no this is all in our heads, don’t look over there….

        Like

      • ML says:

        Oh I’m sure they do monitor and run interference. But they can’t do it everywhere, and coincidentally every time someone disagrees with you, which is pretty much where you idiots are, mentally. You’re just small, exhausting people with a shitty self-absorbed outlook. In the end, they’ll shut us all down not because we’re a threat, but because you people are so fucking obnoxious.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Watch that “exhausting” stuff, Schlomo.

        Like

      • Feral Sigma says:

        Oh I’m sure they do monitor and run interference. But they can’t do it everywhere, and coincidentally every time someone disagrees with you, which is pretty much where you idiots are, mentally. You’re just small, exhausting people with a shitty self-absorbed outlook. In the end, they’ll shut us all down not because we’re a threat, but because you people are so fucking obnoxious

        LOL, it’s true. I’m as Jew-wary as they come, but some of these Jew obsessed posters are just ridiculous. Anyone they disagree with they accuse of being a Jew plant. They sound like fucking Francis Dec.

        But it seems to me that if anyone here is a Jew plant, it’s them: no one could act so stupid except for on purpose and their comically paranoid antisemitism certainly serves to discredit legitimate discussion of the very real Jewish problem.

        It’s also interesting how many of these imbeciles worship (or claim to worship) (((Yeshua))), the magic Jew on a stick.

        Like

    • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

      It’s the new Godwin’s law. Eventually, I forget how many degrees of separation or whatever, but every thread becomes (literally) Hitler.

      Jews are the new Hitler!

      Like

      • ML says:

        Everyone’s a Jew or a Nazi. Lovely. What’s infuriating is that only the Nazi-screaming side acknowledges their role in this psychodrama. This side call you a Jew for noticing. Then say racism is just noticing patterns. Fucking psychopaths. Pull the plug, I say.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Major7 says:

      ML – As if you somehow didn’t know that (((they))) get trashed here on a regular basis, and used as a slur in arguments? That’s been going on here long before you started commenting. It ain’t gonna stop. So why don’t you vote with you’re feet? Stop commenting, or start ignoring it. Instead, you’d rather shut it down. Seems like a control issue to me.

      Like

      • Major7 says:

        BTW, one of my best friends is a kike.

        Like

      • ML says:

        It’s impossible to ignore when every comment is attacked, bud. And these are the autists screeching about “free speech” getting shut down and how awful the left are for their slippery slope logic. But whatever, man. You’re absolutely right and I’m absolutely wrong. You win.

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        Hurrah

        Liked by 1 person

      • Major7 says:

        Not trying to win, I just glide past most of the comments about (((them))), whether I agree or disagree. ‘Course, nobody’s called me a shlomo yet, so maybe I’d find it more irritating if they did. I might even throw my yarmulke, but I’d probably just be farfufket.

        Liked by 2 people

      • ML says:

        Ah ok. It isn’t being called a Jew per se that irritates me, it’s the exact symmetry of their psychology and the “leftists” they think they’re fighting. Mirror images of each other. Flood the whole of life with psychotic shrieking and ideological goblins, find heretics everywhere is the whole strategy. They can’t see they’re products of the same forces that created — permitted — the bluehairs and fags jostling for the enshrinement of their own personality disorders.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        BTW, one of my best friends is a kike.

        Watch that hateful language stuff…

        … that’s the sort of thing that gets the hebes in an uproar.

        Like

      • Major7 says:

        I do see what you mean, and in a healthy culture, there’d be places for discussion/disagreement/debate without the point-and-shriek, Invasion of the Body Snatchers reactions. Problem is, we’re not in a healthy culture, and there’s no place like that, anywhere. Seems to me what we’re seeing is a picking of sides, identifying allies, even if we don’t agree on all points and/or find them irritating as hell. Reasoned debate is a peacetime activity.

        For the record, I agree with (or am open to) a lot of what CO writes about (((them))), but I’m not inclined to use that slur on an anonymous commenter. Except for Tom Jones. ‘Cause it’s funny.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Major7 says:

        Greg, thanks, I get carried away with the hooknose labels. ‘Cause it’s fun. And I hate their foul usury.

        Like

      • ML says:

        “For the record, I agree with (or am open to) a lot of what CO writes about (((them))), but I’m not inclined to use that slur on an anonymous commenter.”

        Well that’s the supreme irony of it all: I was a raving anti-Semite years before these shallowpates got into it. Then I read more books, expanded my horizon. They’ve just stayed where they are, satisfied that that’s the sum of world events. Alex Linder’s “skeleton key to politics”, you know. And it’s perfectly right up to a point, but beyond that — it’s their own psychopathy.

        As for picking sides, it isn’t going to work out for those of you digging in your heels. The mob’s reaction will just get more and more strident until they’re actually lynching us. If that’s what you want, if you really think that will “wake people up”, ok — but white nationalists have been leaning on that bit of wishful thinking for seventy years and running. Think it’s going to up and reverse itself now that they’re tearing down statues? did they pardon Saddam or his cronies, or did they do what every empowered mob does and kill them all?

        Anyway, I appreciate your very half-assed support.

        Like

      • ML says:

        “a lot of what CO writes about”

        Btw, he doesn’t even write. Whatever he says has been said a million friggin’ times by everyone else on any other forum you care to name, and by me prior to a certain year. Please don’t even suggest he’s kind of luminary because of memes with pierced labia and black dildoes. Your standards have got to be higher than that.

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        With Major7 here. I think that the (((tribe))) has been using modern communications technology and propaganda to dominate and try to collapse western civilization for close on a hundred years now, and that battle lines are indeed getting drawn.

        But, that said, the overuse of the accusation in general discussion is starting to become annoying. It’s inclining me to side with ML in this case, even though I generally can’t stand those of his posts which are defeatist. For Christ’s sake, mention of blue toenail polish is now a sign of being a Jewish agent?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Major7 says:

        ML, I’m happy to lend my half-assed support to help a brother in need. Come on, I’m not some chintzy jew!

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        “For Christ’s sake, mention of blue toenail polish is now a sign of being a Jewish agent?”

        No, I believe that accusation was that I’m gay, and that a woman wearing blue toenail polish is eo ipso trash. It’s always something, man.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Major7 says:

        “I was a raving anti-Semite years before these shallowpates got into it. Then I read more books, expanded my horizon. ”

        ML – last thing, there’s plenty of ground between a raving anti-semite and being neutral/agnostic about (((them))). I’m somewhere in there, highly suspicious of Jews in general (both Orthodox and Secular), seeing the need for Christian separatism (and grievously disappointed at the blindness of the Church about this), but at the same time understanding that (((they))) act tribally like any minority will do (and whites will too, when we’re a minority).

        I could go on, but the point is that it’s possible to be highly suspicious of a group without being a hater. That may not be what you meant, but that’s the sense that I got from that comment, that if one gets past being a raving anti-semite, the road leads to neutrality.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Absolutely man. It’s really that simple, and tapping the brakes just that much is too much for these bigots to bear. But isn’t the truth usually between two ideological extremes that people try to browbeat you with?

        It’s just become theology at this point. Jews have apparently achieved superhuman levels of omnipresence, omniscience and agency that would put Laplace’s demon to shame. I guess I am genuinely tired of it, cause I just got out of my car in the road and yelled at some bitch tailgating me. Lol.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sentient says:

        “and tapping the brakes just that much is too much for these bigots to bear. ”

        Again with the bigot language… Come clean ML and admit your tribal affiliation.

        And omnipresence in the media? Oy vei… You been to Hollywood and Mad Ave? Of course you have.

        Like

    • bolg says:

      hard labor shall set you free

      Like

    • Scanman says:

      What a hypersensitive fucking ninny.

      GFY, pussbag.

      Like

    • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

      YOU are the only one that has mentioned jews on here, Shlomo

      Like

  26. Ironsides says:

    Trump just tweeted about “Black Jack” Pershing as regards the new Barcelona attack:

    “Study what General Pershing of the United States did to terrorists when caught. There was no more Radical Islamic Terror for 35 years!”

    The left is going to have a stroke over him invoking Pershing. Always a pleasure to see the Unreasonable Force meet the Unstumpable Object.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Lol. I was just hoping for an islamic attack to get Charlottesville out of the news. Didn’t even take a week.

      And it’s a vehicle attack, no less. I can’t wait for the hot takes comparing the two.

      Like

      • Wild Man says:

        Except that according to Breitbart, “On Thursday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Wolf,” anchor Wolf Blitzer stated that there will be questions about whether the Barcelona terror attack was a copycat of the Charlottesville, Virginia car attack.”

        Because everything is white man’s fault. Absolutely everything. Jewish Retards.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        no “jewish retards”. they premeditate.

        Like

      • Wild Man says:

        Is what Wolf Blitzer said retarded or not? blog – so what you are implying by way of your ‘premeditate’ comment, is that jews think we are retarded? Either way – best to call them out as retarded. Because it is clear that what they are saying is retarded. And that means that they would be saying this either because they really are retarded comprehension-wise themselves, (and there is some evidence for this), or, their judgement is so flawed that they tend to pervasively mis-perceive the state of other people’s aptitude comprehension-wise, which is another form of being retarded.

        Either way, Wolf Blitzer is a Jewish Retard.

        Like

      • Publius says:

        Wild man nails it. COTW

        Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      I was thinking about Pershing in pondering this ever-growing (((Charlottesville Massacre))) by the Frankfurt School. If they’re gonna demand removing statues of Robert E Lee because he was “mean” to chimpanzees, then it won’t be long before they demand removing statues of Black Jack because he was “mean” to armadillos.

      #PanchoVillaDinduNuffin

      PS: My guess is that that’s precisely the Emperor G0d King’s thinking as well. Welcome to 4-D chess.

      Like

  27. SP says:

    Another site just went down – SBPDL or “Stuff Black People Don’t Like”. Gone. Poof. And I don’t know where/if I can ever find it again. Just like the once-great Happy Acres (formerly on Tumblr).

    So, CH, you DO have a backup plan in place when this site is taken down – riiiight?

    I hope you have all the content mirrored somewhere, and that you soon post the alternate address (both IP and new domain) so that when this place is disappeared, we can find you again.

    Like

  28. Greg Eliot says:

    I’ve heard tell that there are some MGTOW who dated midgets at first, in the effort to taper off.

    Like

  29. Carlos Danger says:

    Like

  30. Carlos Danger says:

    Aaron Russo is an amazing interview. This is a short excerpt about the Mark of the Beast.

    Like

  31. Libertardian says:

    Breitbart: ‘On Thursday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Wolf,” anchor Wolf Blitzer stated that there will be questions about whether the Barcelona terror attack was a copycat of the Charlottesville, Virginia car attack.

    CNN Chief National Security Correspondent Jim Scuitto said, “[I]n light of the uproar over the last several days, five days apart, you have white supremacists in Charlottesville use a vehicle to kill, and here you have — attackers at least following the modus operandi of terrorists using vehicles, apparently to kill as well. And it’s that — those shared tactics that should be alarming.”

    Blitzer added, “Yeah, and there will be questions about copycats. There will be questions if what happened in Barcelona, was at all, at all, a copycat version of what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia. Even though they may be different characters, different political ambitions, they used the same killing device, a vehicle going at high speed into a group, a large group of pedestrians.”’

    Like

  32. swebf says:

    Fucking short women is like fucking a child.

    Like

  33. Anon says:

    Ive posted a few times before. This Charlottesville incident coupled with the taking down of the monuments has really got me furious. Whats next? If what’s next is met with no resistance then the endgame HAS to be annihilation. You begin by erasing a people’s history so when you finally do off them, there is no record of it. This things been hot for some time now, just one side is playing.

    Now they’re shutting down sites? Severing lines f communication and organization. Guys, time for in fighting is done. We need every last ally. Im in Alabama and am open for meetups in the very near future. Can someone point me in the right direction please? I very much need to be surrounded by like minded, local MEN that can speak hard truths with full trust and a game plan for offense and defense.

    Like

    • ML says:

      markdyal.com … in Georgia, as solid as they come. Carlos here is from AL too.

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      go to meetup(dot)com and search for “nazi”, “shield wall”, “road rage”, “CIA stooge” and/or “patsy”. there should be plenty of folks there you can connect with.

      good luck!

      Like

      • Sentient says:

        Lol

        Like

      • Anon says:

        Not sure if this is snark or a dig at my naivety. But I will say this, you guys are amazingly bright and I have the utmost respect for you and some if the better posters here….but, there is a bit of a turn off with all the YKW naming, comments like these too….I’m ready to fight….now while I may not be able to offer as much as some of you more experienced men, I am willing. Being snarky, sarcastic and anything other than dead serious considering the times we’re in is just wasted time and potentially turning able body men away. We don’t have the luxury of time as much as we’d think. If you’re in a foxhole and need a split second reply from a comrade, would you think that’d be the best time for a quip or instant info devoid of any unessarry info?

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Are you a Jew Anon? Who do you think you are fighting?

        Like

      • ML says:

        Real men are out there. Just ignore the Jews are everywhere trolls. I don’t because I have no life, lol.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        @Anon

        look bro, here’s the deal. you seem sincere. but all these digital platforms are owned by people who don’t like us, to put it mildly. we’re counting the minutes until this site gets shoahed like the others. so even if you were a regular, it would still be too risky to suggest meetups here. it would give them the perfect reason to shut it down. and we’re all just trying to sip tea here and talk about the latest movies, gossip about girls, share recipes etc.

        until things change its probably better to find your people through some other means. if there’s any lesson to be taken from Charlottes-ambush-ville, it’s be wise and don’t telegraph your intentions to the whole world. be wise as serpents, as someone else here likes to say. our adversaries certainly are.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Talk to Shannon at Athens Gun Shop

        Like

    • Sentient says:

      Reparations are what’s next.

      Like

    • Sentient says:

      FBI

      Like

      • Anon says:

        Here’s what I can offer, as I said not as much as others…

        Wm 200lbs, great shape
        Running background
        Lifting for last 5 years
        Some boxing and muay thai training
        Briefly bjj
        Own few guns
        Grew up in ghettos of north, first hand knowledge of situational awareness needed to survive in such areas
        Extremely hard worker
        Can be good order taker if needed
        Loyal
        Word is bond
        Been in roughly 30 fights in lifetime
        Tested at 120-130 iq
        Fed up

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        If you’re sincere, and not just another JIDF behavioral psych initiative, then welcome aboard.

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        @ anon

        The handle could use some work.

        Like

      • jOHN MOSBY says:

        Seconded.

        Like

    • Days of Broken Arrows says:

      What’s next is that Spotify, Deezer, and CD Baby are removing all the music they consider to be “neo-N*zi.” This is the PMRC of the ’80s all over again, except this time, white nationalism has replaced sex and drugs as the fear du jour.

      Like

      • Random Guy says:

        Well if that’s true expect an incredible upswing in the people listening to that kind of music and putting forth that image or ideology.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well, as it turns out, that erstwhile fear was well-founded, amirite?

        Like

    • PA says:

      Internet forums are, for the time being, for sharing of information and discussion of forward-looking ideas.

      If you wanna, say, meet up and start a softball league, you do that with people you know personally.

      Like

    • SteveRogers42 says:

      Talk IRL to guys at your gym.

      Like

    • jOHN MOSBY says:

      Just google ” Ratfuckers meet ups .”
      Or just ask our resident ratfucker kike, ML ((( Moishe Levi ))).

      Like

  34. ace says:

    Anything under 5’4” is too short, above 5’10” is too tall…ideal heigth for a female is 5’6”. Above 6 foot she completely losses her femininity.

    Like

  35. Wild Man says:

    Breitbart reports that Vice’s senior editor, Wilbert Cooper suggests – “Let’s Blow Up Mount Rushmore’”, because white privilege.

    OK – this time we got a Black Retard (but he is being coached by the ideological bunk preached by Jewish Retards).

    Like

  36. “Tor Project ‘disgusted’ by Daily Stormer”

    The Dark Web—den of child porn—is now denouncing Anglin. If anyone was on the fence about the JQ, I think you can get off it.

    Like

  37. Racer X says:

    Yes, this is a terrible burden, but in the end the girl with a bit more flesh is usually much more fun to play with.

    I personally dislike the girl with a flat ass. A nicely shaped ass, but not too big (as are in some people) is perfect, especially when you are fucking her from behind. It is good slapping material.

    Like

  38. Ironsides says:

    Poast over on Jim’s blog that’s a bit interesting:

    “The plan appears to be to go right ahead with massive repression as if Hillary was president. If the mere president allows this to happen, he and his family get arrested later, by a bunch of social justice warriors dressed as cops carrying a warrant from some judge no one has heard of. If the God Emperor does not allow it to happen, they attempt to arrest him sooner.

    Looks like Spencer and Charlottesville had nothing to do with it. They just happened to be in the line of fire when Democracy Spring started to roll…”

    http://blog.jim.com/war/the-left-plan/

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      “Bring it on… I prefer a straight up fight to all this sneaking around.”

      First, we kill ’em with pop culture references… then, we kill ’em with, eh… kindness. 😉

      Like

    • Ironsides says:

      Kindness, yes. 😉 Precisely, Sir Greg.

      Like

  39. Captain Obvious says:

    Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tennessee, announced Thursday that he plans to introduce articles of impeachment against President Trump. http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3578353/posts

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      (((Priestly Caste Steve Cohen)))

      Like

      • Wild Man says:

        Oh look – another Jewish Retard. Sheesh – what’d anybody ever see in this bunch of retards, of the jewish variety. Pretty much Romanian Gypsies on steroids – nothing more.

        Like

  40. Carlos Danger says:

    Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      This is a good analysis of the coup currently ongoing. This minister is close to the administration and Congress. I believe he leas prayer breakfasts, etc. He was told a week or so ago by Congressmen there was a plot afoot to “take out the President.” The other hints= Brenna and Clapper’s statements of about a month ago and this Mudd fellow from the CIA saying the government was going to kill this guy.

      Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      This current coup will result in an economic crash- probably in September or October as they always are. That will be designed to bring on the serious civil unrest intended to culminate in war.

      Like

  41. Corvo says:

    Like

  42. Moses says:

    Hey Heartiste — it’s only a matter of time before the brownshirts come to de-platform you.

    Take backup measures, if you haven’t already. The idea would be if they de-platform you you’re up and running again in a few hours, middle finger extended.

    Like

  43. Heinrich says:

    [Carlos Danger]

    “Christianity is far more rational than you realize. There is absolutely no conflict between it and science that isn’t an illusion. Another anti-logos tell. I think we worry too much about who is a loyal German and who isn’t when its obvious to most anyway.

    That said, I don’t like what has happened to my country since 1965 or any of the other manipulations of our society and cultural attacks by what is essentially an ethnic criminal mafia using foreign invaders to destroy us. I don’t hate you but I am fully aware of what you really think about us and the crimes you have committed towards that end I felt deeply betrayed when I learned this. I don’t think I can ever truly forgive and forget at this point.

    You chose to make war on us and always have. Control of the press provides you with control of the pop folklore and control over the minds of fools and savages. I resent the Central banking cabal and the efforts to destroy our economy, way of life, destruction of our universities and envious contempt for our obviously superior and richer cultural achievements and the pathological need to plunder us. I resent your weaponization of the Dindu most of all. And yes, it infuriates me to see it destroyed by people who can’t replicate it and do for spite. I will kill to preserve it when the time comes. You have brought this situation on yourselves”

    Like

    • Heinrich says:

      Western civilization is a unique gem, a sparkling light, second to none.
      Truth and beauty is what the human soul desires.

      Liked by 1 person

    • oink says:

      the rot is deeper, much deeper than 1965, or 1919 for that matter

      it goes to 1789 at a minimum, but more likely 1517 is the point of relevance

      It ain’t gonna matter, I’m afraid we’re already mene-tekel-ufarsin’ed;

      the vineyard will be given to moar reliable tenants who will give the fruit to the Lord of the vineyard on time

      (n.b. understand it well, hu-whyte Christian, it was not and it is not yours; the vineyard)

      Like

  44. It’s short women.
    Proportions.
    -IJ

    Liked by 1 person

  45. gunslingergregi says:

    so who gave me the cyanide to drink tasted weird smelled like almonds what the fuck

    Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      chick I usually allow myself to tell I love but I told her I am just making it more fun I don’t love her we have no real relationship

      Like

  46. gunslingergregi says:

    tues 3 am went to sleep woke up fine but yea I didn’t really know what to say

    Like

  47. gunslingergregi says:

    but yea aint like the first time I died and got sent back by god but yea allways a little happier after for sure

    Like

  48. gunslingergregi says:

    someone needs to research how many white dudes dating black chicks do get killed see where we at on that
    cause if we aint allowed to date their then they got to not date ours bro

    Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      course that’s individuals and groups nothing to really worry bout considering everything known shit

      Like

  49. gunslingergregi says:

    for record when my girl cut her hand it was breaking the glass on my back door
    trying to get in house not cause I told her too if directed at me
    at x dude

    Like

  50. gunslingergregi says:

    and she of course always said she had no boyfriend

    Like

  51. gunslingergregi says:

    so getting away with murders I guess cause willing to poison mutherfuckers they want to
    so yea but prob a tech trail on that shit or any dirt so big deal

    Like

  52. gunslingergregi says:

    weird I’m not even angry it really weird peaceful after chillin talked to girl bout it she said don’t do anything dumb or something wonder if she in on it
    letting God handle the shit whatevs not my problem I can’t do or know what God can

    Like

  53. gunslingergregi says:

    rofl not my problem rofl

    Like

  54. gunslingergregi says:

    but yea white chick that did it aint that some shit
    so yea she with a Mexican type dude
    I would like to have a chat with dude who told her do it

    Like

  55. gunslingergregi says:

    maybe she did it so I wouldn’t get tortured or whatever who knows
    I aint never fucked her in pussy though so uhh yea

    Like

  56. gunslingergregi says:

    I also aint the one that drove her away from courthouse and she got a fucking felony fucking escape

    Like

  57. gunslingergregi says:

    or who wanted it done or if just her might be chick lol

    Like

  58. Jack says:

    Tall women have better asses too.

    Like

  59. Caleb says:

    Moral of the story: “Bang Small, Marry Tall”.

    Like

  60. J.T. Malloy says:

    For some reason, the legs of American women have gotten thicker and less shapely in the last 30 years.

    I wonder if ZZ Top is as disappointed with this as I am.

    Like

    • This is the most sad, disparaging article I’ve seen all week; society is declining rapidly. Maybe Christian isolationists like the Duggar family and Mennonites are on to something…

      “And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect.” (Romans 12:2)

      Like

  61. Pleasantly surprised at the love for short women here! Usually guys are conditioned to want tall women like they see in the media…

    [CH: shortness or tallness aren’t decisive factors in a woman’s attractiveness to men. a pretty short girl will get a lot more male attention than a plain looking tall girl.]

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, agreed. I can actually personally attest to that. If anything, being 5’0 is usually more of an asset to my attractiveness than a hindrance. Though when it comes being able to reach things or put clean dishes away on higher shelves, it admittedly stinks! Nothing is made with short people in mind haha!

      Like

      • Tam the Bam says:

        get a compliant beta tradesman to set the fittings lower. Tell your girlfriends he’s your ergonomics therapist.

        Like

  62. Tam the Bam says:

    One thing that kills the B for me is short shins. That “hinged halfway down the tibia” thing. Which is why I could never be a riceburner. That, and stumpy, meaty, wide troll-feet.

    Like

Leave a Reply