I could have a beer with this guy.
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Family sizes have been shrinking all over the developed world.
The downstream psychological and societal impacts of only children are greatly under-appreciated by researchers.
For instance, fewer children means parents have less incentive to discipline or chastise those children for bad life choices. A parent is likely to fear losing the love of an only child more than would a parent fear losing the love of one of her six children.
If an only child decides to troon out, her parents might be hesitant to express much displeasure and disapproval because they don't have any other children to fill the void if that tranny-child decides to rescind her love.
Something like this dynamic, on a large societal scale, has serious implications for the shape of the culture and the willingness of parents to administer tough love. Pampered only children become vehicles for cultural degeneracy by drawing in fearful parents to sustain the system.
-
Butting into this conversation, I have complicated feelings about AI. It is a weapon that we absolutely must not allow the Left to monopolize. The potential to seriously undermine leftoid cultural hegemony via right-wing AI is vast.
But I also know that this is a weapon which in time will destroy us all by ushering into existence the Zero Trust Society and the Zero Employment Economy.
The former is the more likely outcome. For example, imagine AI image generation that can fool even the experts, and then imagine that tech in the hands of anti-Whites, who get to work using AI to retcon our White past with the addition of nonwhites in our photos, videos, and books. Soon, White people could become conditioned to acccept the false memory of a past America that was always majority nonwhite. A massive psy ops of that nature would effectively quell any pockets of White resistance to their racial overrun.
What AI would unleash is the institutionalization of the inability to discern reality from fantasy. People who cannot reliably know truth from fiction in media and government press releases will suffer extreme mental duress, and many will react to this funhouse mirror world by dropping out and re-grounding themselves into very small kinship circles, at the level of hamlets and rural outposts.
People in general just do not sufficiently grasp how utterly awful a zero trust society will be in practice.
-
Through the ballot box.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
😂😂 I had you going didn't I? -
What does a Zero Trust Society look like?
It looks like Mass Surveillance and biometrics.
-
Colorado's White population is shrinking, and currently sits at 65% of the state total. The beaner population is exploding.
"Despite consistent increases in net migration, Colorado’s future growth is precarious. Since 2021, the increases in migration to Colorado have almost exclusively come from international migration, individuals migrating from outside of the United States directly to Colorado, rather than domestic migration, movement from other states into Colorado."
storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/3aa6968ec7a34ff8
For a while, there was domestic net migration flow into Colorado, driven by White Millennials, but that appears to have tapered off.
Politically, what is happening in CO is similar to what has happened in CA. Conservative Whites left, and liberal Whites remained behind or moved in. As nonwhites (mostly hispanics) quickly began to electorally and geographically displace the Whites, the latter responded by either leaving or becoming even more rabidly anti-racist.
This is not a surprising reaction, because it reflects an all too common Stockholm Syndrome attitude toward racial displacement:
"If I overtly express my support for the beaners, they will treat me well and the other liberal Whites won't exile me for wrongthink."
-
If that's what Kavanaugh wrote or implied, then he's basically saying what all of us are thinking: that too much of our national policy is being foisted on the judiciary to decide.
Which is correct, but also highlights the sheer unlikelihood of Congress legislating anything that directly benefits White America. Congress' inability to do its job is not so much the result of institutional inertia as it is the consequence of an upside-down judaized morality that prevents the passing of common sense legislation.
-
Who is more anti-social? The man driving the oversized pickup truck with the pissing Calvin sticker on it, or the woman screaming at you like a banshee for saying trannies should not be public school teachers?
I see anti-social people everywhere.
-
Over 40% of food packaged and sold in the US is kosher.
jews are 2% of the US population.
In effect, Whites are paying a jew tax on their grocery purchases that they did not want nor vote for.
Whites are paying the Jewzya.
-
Are the Whites or the niggers winning the World Cup?
-
I wonder if, at this point, the MAGA red cap does nothing but signal performative spitefulness, and that this perception of neutered rebellion encourages leftoids of either sex but mostly women to make public spectacles of themselves lashing out at MAGA hat wearing White dudes.
If White men were to, instead, brazenly occupy the public square in Hugo Boss SS aesthetics and a happy smile, it would signal intent of purpose, and some of these crazy White women might be more circumspect when confronted by their presence.
"Every woman yearns to submit, but only to he who is worthy of her submission"
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
I think it’s great that Dave Atell and Rick Moranis got together to produce this guy.
meow
Sorry! This guy is a complete douche! This is my definition of douche incarnate. Whew. First he says that the world is “not how women want it to be” but how “it is”. So then I guess he’s going to tell us how the world is,then???? LOL Like HE would know! I imagine “it i”s whatever HE thinks it is. That is too stupid for words. Then he goes on to say the woman who wrote the book was a liar/delusional/idiotic..whatever…for saying she “didn’t hit her stride till 40″. Every half wit knows that women reach their sexual prime in their 40′s. This idiot must have just fallen off the turnip truck. Oh, roissy, when will you grown up? How old are you anyway??
who is his/yours target audience?
the jedi council.
Wait candy cane…. are you serious?
For a while, I thought your comment cleverly tongue in cheek..
What do you all think of this year’s American Idol finalist girls on the looks scale? I’m going almost purely on looks, but personality has an influence in exceptional cases.
http://www.americanidol.com/contestants/season7/
Here are my ratings:
Kristy Lee Cook: (9) near-perfect because of her wholesomeness
Kady Malloy: (9) something vaguely “common” about her that keeps her from being a perfect 10
Alaina Whitaker: (8) her youth is her biggest asset.
Brooke White: (7) a bit odd looking, but the quirky factor is a plus in her case.
Syesha Mercado: (7) cute but unremarkable
Carly Smithson: (6) too thick for my liking and tattoos are deal-breakers, but has a nice feminine sweetness
Ramiele Malubay: (6) cute because young; won’t age well
Asia’h Epperson: (6) I don’t remember her that well
Alexandrea Lushington: (5) too short, and boyish in a bad way
Amanda Overmyer: (4) Mannish
Here is my attempt at the guys, from a straight woman’s perspective (to the best of my ability) 🙂
I rated the guys more so as as women would, 50/50 looks and personality.
Michael Johns: (10) find one flaw.
Jason Castro: (8) a niche taste; there is something of a young John Travolta in his smile; too stoned-looking for many girls
David Cook: (7) short and a clownish face, but grows on you
Chikeze Eze: (7) solid but not exciting
Garret Haley: (6) too sweet, but has potential, with age
David Archuleta: (6) see Garret above
Luke Menard: (6) tall and good looking, but clearly a beta
Jason Yeager: (6) I don’t remember him that well
Colton Berry: (4) Bill Clinton’s retarded bastard child
Robbie Carrico: (3) a pinched face and a loserish chip on his shoulder
Danny Noriega: (1) he ain’t interested in you, ladies
6 nullpointer
There is nothing clever about my comment! The guy is a creep. Just like roissy, I state my opinions as fact.
the jedi council.
are you really that nerdy about having sex with attractive women?
videos? its that kind of blog now?
PA,
Get the fuck out of here with that American Idol shit, are you being serious
Candy Cane,
Roissy will grow up when you stop repeating yourself in every comment.
Roissy,
This dude is Gold. He does look like a social retard though. He’s got the mind right but I wonder how he does in the field. That’s the problem with the game EVERYBODY knows what to say, few know how to say it
VK, yeah, the Idol stuff belongs in the previous post. But like Roissy, I’m into charts & graphs. Good times.
that was way too long a dissection of a book that no one cares about. that guy needs hobbies, like small engine repair.
I think this guy is okay socially, I think he’s good because he says what he wants in a very straightforward way. Not super smooth, but I can see him getting laid.
Anyway, I LOVE what he has to say. Dead on, especially about women wanting to believe something is true just because they wish it to be true.
By the way, check this page and listen to the Cougar theme song:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=82209354
Go to the profile and click the song “Cougars.”
“That’s the problem with the game EVERYBODY knows what to say, few know how to say it”
For real!
Respect.
That guy gives me a headache. He’s so serious with his furrowed brow. Yesterday I could only get through the first 1:42 seconds, today I endured another 3 minutes. He says nothing of any interest here. He is probably right about the sorry bitch who wrote this book. It is a cruel joke of nature that women in their 40′s are as horny as 19 year old boys. What does it mean? I have no clue, but as a woman who falls into the so-called cougar age range (a label I find really stupid) I would rather sow it shut than sleep with any of the 20 something year olds that hit on me. She is an idiot if she thinks any good will come of it. This is just more mindless pulp-fodder for the bored masses.
12 Virgl
Same post? Yes; roissy and I have much in common.
What he says is that cougars are deluding themselves about what they want. Fine, but at least there are still older women out there for the young guys to target.
After all, isn’t a big theme on this blog the fact that younger women are open to competition from young men AND old men, so that makes them way to cocky?
Well, hopefully the cougar phenomenon will decrease the power of the young women.
Danny Noriega: (1) he ain’t interested in you, ladies
He’s the cutest one out of the whole lot. Guarantee you that he could have his pick of girls if he was straight, and a lot of girls have crushes on him even if they knew he was 100% gay. His smile itself speaks volumes.
EVERYBODY knows what to say, few know how to say it.
So true. This guy has zero camera charisma and sets off my creep-dar big time in a holy shit I’m scared of him way. I can’t stand to watch this video for more than 20 seconds, and it isn’t that he’s bad looking. But he would be a lot better looking if didn’t frown at the camera the way he did.
Man alive…the head bobbing and exaggerated expressions…it is just too much. I could only endure a minute and a half of this. He may have worked out “how things are” in this head, but I cannot see him pulling a lot of women.
But, to a certain extent, women do tend to see things on how they wish them to be, not how they are. Hence, the aloof jackass is called “sensitive and misunderstood”. No, ladies, he is an asshole.
Women in their late 30′s/40′s = Sexual Prime
I was under the impression that this was something of a myth.
Here was the story that I understood:
When girls are in their teens and 20′s, many of them are too self-conscious or feel too vulnerable that they can not express themselves and enjoy themselves freely.
It is only after they have either gotten older or experienced a few relationships that they can,
1.) Worry less about what the guy is thinking
2.) Ask for what they want
3.) Use their accumulated knowledge
4.) Use their accumulated experience
etc.
And, so, if some young woman already feels “comfortable” with herself or with the man, then she can absolutely enjoy sex on any or all levels.
Thoughts?
Hey, Lemmonex, I know that you lost a significant amount of weight (and you are still young)…
Did you notice any difference in being able to enjoy sex or intimacy after losing the weight?
Oooo, look, Agent Smith reviews a book.
That dude sounds to me like he based his speech pattern and enunciation on the Agent Smith character from the Matrix.
Hence, the aloof jackass is called “sensitive and misunderstood”. No, ladies, he is an asshole.
The labeling of a guy as sensitive and misunderstood is simply a post-attraction rationalization that girls give for being attracted to a guy who isn’t a good person.
Biology always wins.
Candy Cane,
Wow, in your earlier comment you call this guy a douche incarnate and think what he’s saying is “too stupid for words” and then ripped him for what he said about the writer of the book. Then after watching 3 more minutes of the video you come back with, “he’s probably right about the sorry bitch who wrote this book”.
WTF?!? Try thinking things through all the way or watching a whole thing before you make snap judgments then coming back later to back track on the stupid comment you already made. You keep bring knives to these gunfights. Idiot
Hope, what is it about Danny Noriega that you say makes girls like him? I’m guessing you mean women over 18. Hug and smother him, maybe, but be with him?
And you rank him above Miachael Johns? I’d figure MJ would have it all from a woman’s perspective: tall, good looking, great hair, like an athletic Jim Morrison. Plus he’s a nice guy who is clearly an alpha…. but maybe that’s my guy-ness speaking — for me he’d make a great buddy or a slightly younger brother.
Re-reading my guy ratings, I’d take David Archuleta down a notch to a (5) because of his wierd, reptilian toungue-flicking when he sings.
women in their 40s (and i think that is just a wishful hold over form research in the 70/80s that said women in their 30s are in their sexy prime) are in their prime in the same way that men in their 50s are in their prime because they have the highest disposable income they are likely to have.
it’s just a result of our society/culture. women are at their sexual peak young, so are men. that’s when we are designed to fuck the most and have the healthiest kids.
24 Virgl
“Try thinking things through all the way or watching a whole thing before you make snap judgments then coming back later to back track on the stupid comment you already made. You keep bring knives to these gunfights. Idiot”
I take full responsibility for both comments. He is still a douche and my opinion is backed up by the other women posters here. He is a douche who made a few good points and a few very bad points. Sorry if you don’t like my opinion(s)…..jerk. 😀
I never watched the TV show PA, so my judgment is based on the photos alone. I’m sure once personality comes into play the ratings would be different.
By the way, research indicates that different women in different geographic areas look for different things in men:
In such densely populated places, personal ads indicate that material comforts provided by males seem more important to women than do the emotional or intellectual aspects of a relationship.
But in medium- and smaller-sized cities, the biologist’s reading of newspaper personal ads found the opposite: women place more emphasis on emotional aspects or personal interests of potential mates, and less on materialism, argues McGraw.
“This study emphasises the flexibility of mating strategies, depending on the environments individuals find themselves in,” he says. “The rich guys don’t always win. And the nice guys don’t always finish last — although they might have to move to be found by the right mate.”
So biology does win in the end, but it’s different for women in different places. One shoe does not fit all, after all.
It makes sense, now that you say that you don’t watch the show and are commenting just based on the pics. Just so you know, Noriega sets of sprinklers.
UL,
Young? I am 27, which I still consider myself to be young, but to some I am getting dangerously close to undesirable territory.
I could write a book about how things have changed. The long and short of it is this: everything has changed.
Hot guys want to fuck me. That is a pretty seismic shift.
I am no longer hidden from friends…I am not an embarrassment.
I still have insecurities about my body, but have gotten a lot more open and experimental.
I feel it has made me more defensive and less able to make emotional connections with men, wondering if they would have liked me 65 lbs ago. (Most of the time I know the answer is no.)
And honestly, I think more about my weight now then I ever did when I was heavy. In the past two years, since I took it off, I have only moved up and down within a 5 lb range. I have been to the promised land; I do not ever want to go back to being the girl that is banged in secrecy.
Of course I speak only for myself…
He definitely has a weird drawl
I am no longer hidden from friends
Could you explain that. Who was hiding you? From whom? I was the fattest kid in my high school class of over 400 kids, so, I am really curious.
…wondering if they would have liked me 65 lbs ago.
You wonder if they would have liked you back then or if they would have been attracted to you back then? There is a HUGE difference.
I have liked plenty of girls that I was not attracted to. (And, conversely, been attracted to more than a few that I did not like.) I hope that does not speak poorly of me.
24 Virgl
Furthermore Virgl, only knives cut though bullshit, guns just spread it around. Another thing this “expert” states as fact is that a woman must be younger for a man to fall in love with her. His opinion is contradicted all over the place, but he states it as some biological fact.
rina:
are you really that nerdy about having sex with attractive women?
i like watching the subjects of my experiments squirm.
reggie: I think it’s great that Dave Atell and Rick Moranis got together to produce this guy.
lol.
fyi, i thought the guy’s mannerisms and facial expressions were funny, that’s why i linked it. and of course the truth of what he says can’t be argued.
UL,
Oye. OK, we are merely talking about my personal experiences. You asked about being overweight and sex. This has nothing to do with friendships, meaningful relationships, etc.
If a guy is in to blonds, or eye patches, or a woman covered in piercings, he is not going to like me. Attraction is attraction, and of course, you are not an asshole just because you are not sexually attracted to me…now or then. But, I am saying, if I am your “type” and you saw me now and you saw me then, I am willing to go out on a ledge and say you would be *more* attracted to me now.
Also, I was hidden–by men– because they did not want their friends to know they were fucking a fatty. Simple enough, right? I had a lot of “relationships” that only started at 2 am.
Also, I was hidden–by men– because they did not want their friends to know they were fucking a fatty. Simple enough, right? I had a lot of “relationships” that only started at 2 am.
Damn, I am sorry.
You asked about being overweight and sex.
No I wasn’t. You had said that they would (probably) not like you. I was curious.
If a guy is in to blonds, or eye patches, or a woman covered in piercings, he is not going to like me. Attraction is attraction, and of course, you are not an asshole just because you are not sexually attracted to me…now or then. But, I am saying, if I am your “type” and you saw me now and you saw me then, I am willing to go out on a ledge and say you would be *more* attracted to me now.
You see, I think that this is really important. You actually changed the subject/question. You initialyl said “liked, but, then, after I asked my particular question, you then changed the word to “attracted”.
Which is fine. But, well, I think it is really interesting.
I once had this exact conversation with a girl I was dating:
Her: Would you still love me if I gained 100 lbs.?
Me: Absolutely. I was the fattest kid in my school…my Mom is fat, my Dad is fat and my Brother is fat and getting fatter. And I love them all dearly.
Her: Ugh. That is not what I meant.
Me: I know what you meant.
Her: (Dirty Look)
———————————————–
BTW, she never did ask me if I would be attracted to her if she gained all that weight, because she knew that it was a ridiculous question. You can imagine how many obese women she found attractive.
i like watching the subjects of my experiments squirm.
I like being in love and loving my man.
Roissy, you are a master of manipulation. The meter maid inside me applauds your talent.
Christ, not this “old women are at their sexual peak” horseshit again. When will people learn to stop talking nonsense? If you’re too self-deluded to understand why that would make absolutely no sense, let’s have a look at data — representative data, not what a couple of horny old cougars say.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w10499
“In the over-40 category, the frequency of sex is much lower. Among older women the median amount of sex is once a month, while for males it is 2-3 times a month”
“A third of over-40s say they are celibate.”
“among the under-40s 84% of US women and 70% of US men had at most one sexual partner in the previous year”
but
“40% of American females over the age of 40 did not have sexual intercourse in the previous year. The figure for American males is 20%.”
“As might be expected, Table 5 finds that aging reduces sexual activity.”
And especially relevant for the career woman the Cougar book is geared toward:
“Highly educated females tend to have fewer sexual partners.”
This continues even into the “golden years”:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/08/23/GR2007082300347.html
The fact that data like this needs to be provided, when you could figure out the rough pattern just be observing people and noting who appears more horny and boy-crazy — younger or older females — is a testament to the power of self-deception.
Candy Cane sez: “Every half wit knows that women reach their sexual prime in their 40’s. ”
This is biologicvally impossible. When women hit their 40s, they start to get pre-menopausal and their reproductive system starts shutting down. Their sex drives wanes and the biological functions that make sex easy start to stop (I won’t get graphic here).
Beyond that, Roissy has correctly pointed out that the way a man behaves in bed has a lot to do with the way a woman looks. And women in their 40s simply do not look like 20 year olds (much less 30 year olds). Maybe you might think you’re the exception or mayb you watch too much Oprah.
Finally, not to get mean, but Candy seems to bring this on: There are other subtle things about older women that turn men off beyond looks. Often older women develop weird ways of speaking that can grate the nerves. And much of the time, they smell weird — likely from the slew of chemical products they use to appear “younger.”
And has anyone else noticed that when women stay single and get older they develope unappealing quirks and belief systems, and then act like their way is the “right” way and the only way?
All the things you say about older women, DOBA, can be said of many or most older men too.
I’d find the results of that study – as quoted here – more convincing if they made any mention of who was partnered and who was not. Many more women than men past the age of 40 are likely to be widowed. Those who are not may even be choosing to say no to sex, not from lack of desire but because they don’t like the men available to them, or aren’t sufficiently interested in them, or not in the right way. I did this when I was younger; I do it now that I’m an old lady. And the last time someone invited me into a (serious) sexual relationship with him was about a month ago. I said no.
All the things you say about older women, DOBA, can be said of many or most older men too.
a-greed. but, an older man is still on top of this gender war.
because either:
1) on the rare occasion that a young woman finds these quirks and belief systems interesting or true, then this old man is lucky to have found the rare woman who will truly love him for him and not his money or status.
or 2) many women can fully ignore her man’s quirks and belief system, or at least abstain from argument for the sake of keeping the relationship in tact.
men, particularly older men, are too stubborn to ignore a woman’s hard beliefs and quirks, nor do they have as much need to keep a sub-par relationship together.
+1 older men
-1 older women
just stop rubbing it, roissy
All the things you say about older women, DOBA, can be said of many or most older men too.
Yes, but they don’t attempt to tell the world that they are in their Sexual Prime.
No, but “sexual prime” is to some degree a subjective concept. It’s one of those rare areas of life about which a person can legitimately make a claim that “this is my reality” without seeming delusional. Was the woman in the book saying that “sexual prime” occurs in the 40s for every woman, or just that her own did? The former is certainly a silly claim; the latter is not.
Anyway, there are some equally silly claims being made about “all women” in this comment thread, such as the idea that no man ever shows any sexual or romantic interest in a woman again once she’s over 40 or 45 or whatever the cutoff point is.
It’s one of those rare areas of life about which a person can legitimately make a claim that “this is my reality” without seeming delusional.
I agree. Like I said in comment 21, I think that there are all sorts of valid reasons why a women would feel in her sexual prime at that age.
Anyway, there are some equally silly claims being made about “all women” in this comment thread, such as the idea that no man ever shows any sexual or romantic interest in a woman again once she’s over 40 or 45 or whatever the cutoff point is.
Yes, obviously when we use that kind of language, “yo, all women are…” we are heading into bullsh*t territory. But, I think that we, the guys, often bristle against what seemed to be the PC truth, and, therefore, Gospel truth.
So, we blast back against it. And, being men, the language can be brutul.
39 DOBA
“Often older women develop weird ways of speaking that can grate the nerves. And much of the time, they smell weird — likely from the slew of chemical products they use to appear “younger.”
Whoa. The smelling weird thing? I totally get you on that. I’m doing a major detox right now with those Japanese Detox foot patches you may have seen on TV. Disgusting stuff comes off on those pads and I had the thought that women must be more toxic because of all the chemicals in hair, skin, nail, and cosmetic products. I’m really hoping to avoid that “old person” smell as I’m very sensitive to smells myself. I can’t date a man who smells weird and many men drink too much alcohol and eat too much meat and makes them smell really bad. Good smells are intoxicating, like I need to tell you.
As far as women being in their peak at 40ish? Somehow that “rumor” got started and there is some recent scientific evidence but it’s hard to find unless you’re privy to real studies and not stuff you can google search. It may be a “myth” but I think there is also truth in it. The Kinsey report came to that conclusion and I think there are more studies that back it up and of course there may be those that do not.
candy cane:
Every half wit knows that women reach their sexual prime in their 40’s.
It’s not true, but it’s what every half-wit knows. Prime example above.
I have only done minimal reading on the Kinsey report, but I was under the impression that it was complete horse-shit.
if by “sexual prime” you mean “being open to sex on the first date” then, yes, many over-40 women are in their sexual prime.
if, otoh, by “sexual prime” you mean “hornier, more orgasmic, and better lubricated” then under-30 women have the over-40 women beat by a country mile.
this is not just opinion, it is biological fact.
46 Steve
“It’s not true, but it’s what every half-wit knows.”
Touche’! Like that one.
Roissy, I still think 40 is hornier than 30. When you say ‘biological fact’ where is the conclusive and undisputed scientific study?
Roissy, your “biological fact” may be a fact – but there are several other facts working against it. One is that very young women often don’t know their bodies well enough to feel sexual pleasure easily, although this may have changed now that young women are so much less inhibited. But I remember being rather surprised in my early 20s when a number of girls my age confessed to me that they didn’t really enjoy sex all that much and liked it for the “closeness” rather than physical pleasure. Another thing that works against younger women’s sexual enjoyment: fear of pregnancy. Still another: birth control pills which take away the fear of pregnancy, more or less, but dampen sexual enjoyment for many women. Final fact: testosterone increases slightly in older women (yes, ugh, I know), giving them a sexual responsiveness more like men’s – that is, less invested in emotion.
I’m with Clio and Candy Cane on this one. No disputing that a gal of 18 is far more a-burst with vitality and juice, of course. But she often 1) has no idea what to do about it, 2) is terrified of it, 3) is far more desperate for a relationship than a good fucking. It’s *very* common for women to finally relax about sex once they’re out of their 20s, and to start seeing the point of raw humping.
Speaking of biological sense — this actually makes biological sense. Young gals are (generally) anxious about pairing up and breeding. That takes precedence over raw fucking. Once the pairing up and breeding have been gotten out of the way, a generall easing up occurs … A general waking-up to “lordy this can be fun” occurs. Widely noted in other cultures, by the way. Frenchwomen: naughty, clueless, and hot to trot as 18 year olds (notorious for fucking daddy’s best friend), but driven more by a need to be obnoxious and desirable than anything else … Then a sexy-proper bourgeois wife and maman … Then at 40, free finally to enact her own sexual dramas.
It’s one of life’s sadder jokes that men and women peak sexually at different ages, and have distinctively different arcs to their sexual careers. Women of 40 and dudez of 16 make an ideal pairing, as far as I can tell. The gals are finally over the youthful anxieties and malarkey, and are able to manage and appreciate young stallions for all they’re worth.
Young ladies — you may think you see the point of sex now, but wait just a bit.
OBVIOUSLY only a woman who actually IS 40 can tell you if she is hornier at 40 than at any other age of her life. Many women don’t indulge their sex drives no matter how voracious because they may not want to indulge for personal/moral reasons, or they may be married to a man they are no longer attracted to. Women have different standards when it comes to indulging their sex drive.
The cougar phenomena seems to be trying to encourage 40ish women to not be ashamed to fuck like a wild teenage boy if the urge strikes them. This may also fall into the category of older woman teaching younger men the ways of sex, love, how to treat a woman, etc., in a safe environment.
They say women hit their sexual prime in their 30′s, when they know their body, are happier with life (???) etc…
Sexual prime is defined as the want/need to have more sex, and (claimingly) enjoy sex more.
Is it not a coincidence this time, the time when a woman starts craving for sex, start wanting more sex, is more ready for sex, and all other combinations, happens to be at the same time when her sexual prime, fertility and attractiveness has plummeted down?
In these women,
I would replace the phrase “having sex” with “having sex as a means to feel sexy”….