Feed on
Posts
Comments

A True Word On Sexual Consent

A couple of serial rapists are profiled by The Daily Fembeast because they had accounts on the Real Social Dynamics seduction arts forum. The bitter feminist cunts smelled chum in the water and are working double time to smear good-natured ladies’ men through guilt by remote association with a few random bad seeds (whom I’d never heard of until I read the article).

Since PUAs and consent are in the hivemind news, I figure this a good time to recap the Chateau crib sheet on what does and doesn’t qualify as sexual consent. Stripping out all romantic context (sometimes a woman’s breathlessly whispered “no” really is a surreptitious arousal-amplifying invitation to the man to continue resisting her coyness), the legalistic basics of hookup look like this:

If a girl is drunk and she says yes to sex- it isn’t rape.
If a girl is sober and she says yes to sex- it isn’t rape.

If a girl is sober and she says no- it is rape.
If a girl is drunk and she says no- it is rape.

Fleshing out the above basics to conform more closely to the reality on the ground that hookups take two to tango, here are the additional by-laws governing the validity of rape accusations should a sexual congress occur:

  • If the girl and man are sober and the girl angrily says “no”- it is rape. (the vast majority of (white) men can tell, and will heed, when a girl is sincerely uninterested in further intimacy)
  • If the girl is blackout drunk and the man is sober- it is rape, if the rape was initiated while the girl was unconscious.
  • If the girl is drunk but conscious and situationally aware and a willing participant, and the man is sober- it isn’t rape. (this is a not uncommon occurrence for the simple reason that it takes more drinks and a longer time for men to reach happy drunkenness; thus an early-evening sexual intimacy can start with the girl more drunk than the man but wind up a couple hours later with the man equally as drunk as the girl)
  • If the girl is so drunk she can’t give consent AND the man is so drunk he can’t know whether or not the girl consented- it isn’t rape. (sorry, femcunts, the drunkenness sword cuts both ways)
  • If the girl is sober and the man is too drunk to understand or give consent- how the fuck is his johnson working?? and why is she sticking around at his place when she could easily leave while he’s in a stupor on the floor?

The mythological rape culture that feminists secretly wish would come to fruition is actually a projection of their desire to see a world in which women are exempted from personal responsibility and men bear all the burden of any female regret for romantic trysts that don’t end in two kids and a house in the suburbs.

This is why feminists (of the lite or heavy genus) strive so mightily to protect women’s prerogatives to drink like Russian poets and slut it up like two dollar street whores. Feminists don’t want women to even THINK about the necessity of taking a modicum of personal responsibility for limiting their alcohol intake or curbing their skank signaling; to admit to that much would, in the feminist worldview, concede that the sexes are innately biologically different (they are regardless of heated denials to the contrary) and that men aren’t the only sex capable of transgressing moral norms. As CH previously wrote,

if you are a woman who is afraid your inner slut might escape to have sex under the influence with a man at a party who is also under the influence, it’s up to you to refrain from drinking a lot or attending that party. The responsibility to remain sober — or at least avoid getting lights out drunk — should not rest solely with the man.

If feminists are truly interested in not being treated like morally undeveloped children under the law, they will agree to my definition of rape. But since feminism is about power dynamics and not at all about fairness or justice, they will never agree.

In a female sexuality-liberated market it’s a secularist sin worthy of livelihood destruction to advise women to stop drinking like they’re fraternity pledges trying to prove something. But if feminists are truly interested in decreasing the incidence of late night drunkenness rape (aka morning after regret rape) they’ll counsel women to be careful how much they imbibe while out on the town. Since they don’t counsel that, and in fact advocate the opposite that women should be free to drink as much as they want in sexually charged public venues, it’s obvious feminists aren’t really interested in reducing rape rates.

The sticking point for feminists, of course, is that “stopping short of drinking to oblivion” and “dressing a little more modestly than a ghetto hooker” harkens the return of a “patriarchal” culture that “places demands” on women. Well, yes. Demands are placed. It’s called adulthood. Maybe feminists could live up to their female empowerment bloviating and leave the childishness of immunity from moral agency behind.

174 Responses to “A True Word On Sexual Consent”

  1. […] A True Word On Sexual Consent […]

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Mildly off-topic, but I read enough of the article at “archive.is” to get the gist of it, and if* the c_nts are speaking truthfully, then those dudes are not PUAs. Tag-teaming a beey0tch while she’s lying unconscious in a pool of her own vomit? PUA means Pick Up ARTIST, not Pick Up Thug. Sheesh.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        *Granted, a huge “IF” – if you can trust a Femc_nt to testify truthfully under oath.

        Like

  2. uh says:

    And you guys jump on me when I say white women are terrible.

    [CH: not sure how you get from this post to your conclusion.]

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      If you want to say all women, White or otherwise, who are feminists and those who follow the fats/tats/brats parade are terrible, I wouldn’t say a damn thing.

      Like

      • That’s not what she wants to say, Greg.

        After all, she’s gone from picking scabbies in her wheelchair to reading Livy in her cubicle. She’s a (((big))) girl, she knows what she means.

        Like

    • Have I heard right? Saruhcide’s new chore
      Is to lecture forth ‘pon a Punic War?
      Hast hasbara’s shekels allowed her to score
      A paperback by Aubrey De Selincourt?

      Or has, unsuspected, this learned lumber
      Come her way by dint of perusing tumblr?
      Has her gaze at last unpryed itself from her pill-poxed stool
      To prove herself to all and sundry as noone’s fool?

      Tis certain, few to none woudda evah thunk it
      To hear saruh lament a declining republic;
      And it certainly flummoxes the brain, ‘tis true
      To hear saruh bewail the decline of public virtue.

      For all that, her gambit earns her a grade of zero:
      For who can forget, saruh’s role model is Nero.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Golf clap… with a gold star on that chore/war/score//Selincourt stanza. lzozl

        Like

      • mendo says:

        One of your better ones, Lucius.

        Like

      • lolzlz tanks, Greg!

        though my roving eye already suggest a few emendations:

        ” . . . to all and sundry nobody’s fool” has better flow.

        And though in the moment I wrote it off as a tad too much, “saruh’s hero’s Nero” is surely too obvious, and tongue-rolling, to miss. Even if, in strict historical accuracy, Caligula– or Herod? or rather, Messalina, or Salome?– is truer to form? But rhyme is a cruel mistress.

        Oh well. I’ll save it for the Norton Critical Edition.

        Like

      • Wrong Side of History says:

        Ha.

        I wanted to be Caligula as a kid.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Strapunzel wanted to be his horse…

        … objective met: partially.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        The other day, someone was saying that circa 1950, the three most popular sports in the USA were baseball, boxing, and horse racing. Not sure about baseball, but my guess is that boxing & horse racing attracted substantial female viewership. You know what they say about chicks & horses…

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        And I don’t know that I could ever trust a chick who “hung out” at the horse racing track…

        Like

  3. theasdgamer says:

    If a woman is sober and a man is too drunk to give consent, then how is the woman not being charged with rape?

    Like

  4. Anonymous says:

    There were a couple of high profile college rape cases in my area recently.

    In both it appeared to be a beta orbiter of a girl who hung around until the girl was tipsy and pounced so to speak. Both cases centered around the idea of consensual vs. forced. And seemed to be decided based on lack of physical evidence the girl was harmed due to being forced. That is both girls claimed non-consent and were not able to display physical evidence that they were in any way forced consistent with their original police complaint (both claimed they struggled).

    Both young men were exonerated by jury. Both men will not be allowed back at school after their acquittal.

    But these two cases kinda made me think that the “explosion” of rape complaints on campus are in situations where the man is beta, and after an encounter that the girl regrets is later re-imagined to be rape.

    Oh and in BOTH cases it was only after talking with “female friends” that the girl decided to file a police report.

    [CH: yes we’re seeing a lot of this and it’s disgusting. the man-hating culture that the US has become is exacting its toll in the lives of innocent men.]

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      It ain’t “r@pe” unless she’s unhappy about it afterwards. And waking up and realizing that she foolishly allowed a beta schlub loser to score makes her very, very unhappy.

      Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      What I’ve always found rather odd is that a woman is more likely to slap an alpha across the face and yell at him if she isn’t interested (at least, at that particular moment…), but if a beta tries to make a move, she’ll put up an aloof if not nice front but viciously complain to third parties behind his back.

      IOW, women are more direct and upfront with alphas, but underhanded and backstabbing with betas.

      Like

    • Haven M. says:

      explosion?
      Like how Sweden became rape capital of world because of college?
      uhhuh.
      Feminutzis change definition to any unwanted contact or attempt ever and boom rape. College is where most ppl try to find mates…fuck buds…and so yeah, there’s going to be sexual contact including rejeted sex contact.
      But is it rape? no. duh.

      Like

    • Pwn says:

      They should sue their university.

      Like

  5. Vincent says:

    OT
    If any of you crackers dun be down in Charlutt, dun carry dat gat. Bruthas be out an’ sheet…

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      I jes’ rolls mah eyes up t’wards de skies and sez: “Feets, doan fail me now!”

      Like

    • tteclod says:

      Charlotte is minority White. Why would a Cracker live in such a hell-hole?

      Like

    • anony says:

      bring it dindu

      Like

      • Publius says:

        1:40 lolzozozoz

        Like

      • Publius says:

        2:53 lolzozozozoz

        Like

      • Haven M. says:

        those little bitches make me smile.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “niggas ain’t gonna do shit. niggas gonna go get they weed. niggas goin go play they video games. them crackers be preparin fo’ war and when dem crackas come tell you to get you ass in that truck you gonna git yo ass in that truck.”

        bahahaha!

        Like

      • Haven M. says:

        I’m not all race war and shit and I’d bet the cracker in the video aren’t either but damn 2:53 filled me with some bullet envy.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        “And yo’ ammo is gonna run out, so dat mean yo’ gots to make every bullet count and put in in a mo-fo’s haid… but a nigger shoot a whole clip and don’t hit nuthin’, ‘cept maybe a mo-fo he didn’t mean to hit.”

        or something to that lzozlozlozlozlozlozol effect.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I may have to rethink my stance about women in the military.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        3:28

        Like

    • itsme says:

      His family said Scott, an African-American, was unarmed and sitting in his car reading a book, waiting for his son to come home from school.

      sure, that’s believable

      lozlzozlzolzlllzolzz

      [CH: in 99.9% of these “unarmed black victim” police shootings the dindu was doing something that would justify the use of police force.]

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Father of seven… geez, Louise, this country is DONE, as it currently stands.

        Even when a negro policeman does the shooting, and the negro chief of police addresses the media, the dindus still riot. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        And yet yesterday all I saw on Fox News was a story about some White female officer shooting a negro man who seemed to have his hands in the air, and Hillary coming over the airwaves to blame all White people for their racism.

        I’m guessing this was a different shooting incident, or did the media totally misrepresent it as this Charlotte shooting?

        Like

      • tteclod says:

        I saw that video of the Tulsa shooting. Man was reaching into his car, from what I could see.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Now they say there was a vial of PSP in the car as well… but I dunno.

        I mean, I’ll give the benefit of the doubt to the police over a dindu most times, but this one smells bad… especially with some tiny female officer obviously panicking.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        That female cop in a panic angle works against Hillary.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I think you mean PCP.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I can’t be held responsible for any physical typos…

        … mental ones, neither. :-p

        Like

      • itsme says:

        re: tulsa shooting

        the female officer’s side of the shooting:

        http://abcnews.go.com/US/tulsa-police-officer-shares-side-story-terence-crutchers/story?id=42243843

        helicopter surveillance video:

        you can see she has her gun drawn and pointed at him, but he is walking away from her.

        when a police officer is spooked (heh) and draws and points his weapon at you, the next thing he does is tell you to get on the fucking ground.

        that’s basic police procedure, the cops in the chopper know this and realize that some shit is going to go down real soon because the suspect is clearly ignoring commands to stop.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        If you are ever arrested, cooperate. Be polite and deferential to the officer and call him sir or officer. Let the lawyers sort it out. Arguing just makes you look stupid and petty and the judge will not take it well. This is especially so if you are innocent.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        And always plead the fifth. Never give evidence against yourself.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Police have got to start waiting until they actually see a gun…

        … yeah, I know, then it may be too late, but odds are they’ll still have the drop on the perp.

        The alternative… what we’ve been seeing quite a bit of recently, shooting when the least bit of doubt arises… just leads to the Syna-thedral having a field day… and a lot of stuff getting broke.. and the dindus getting more sympathy and press… when the truth about their criminal behavior gets buried even more.

        Like

      • Amasius says:

        The fundamental problem is that blacks no longer respect us. They don’t fear us. Watch this video of a pickaninny negress (a few minutes here and there will suffice. I don’t recommend watching the whole thing unless you need a very vivid reminder of how subhuman blacks are) ranting and raving and cursing and insulting and baiting the cops for an HOUR STRAIGHT.

        And the cops just take it! We’re still barely allowed to defend our lives when they try to murder us, but how long will that hold? This right of self-defense is already under attack. The Nigger Felon League is in open revolt against White America with Kaepernick as the post-modern Nat Turner. It’s not too hard to imagine a future where (some) Whites under attack will just drop to their knees and say “take me.”

        Like

      • itsme says:

        Police have got to start waiting until they actually see a gun…

        what’s damning for the female officer is that she used her gun while the other (male) officer used a taser. so it may very well be that she panicked and overreacted with lethal force.

        Like

  6. Ang Aamer says:

    There were a couple of high profile college rape cases in my area recently.

    In both it appeared to be a beta orbiter of a girl who hung around until the girl was tipsy and pounced so to speak. Both cases centered around the idea of consensual vs. forced. And seemed to be decided based on lack of physical evidence the girl was harmed due to being forced. That is both girls claimed non-consent and were not able to display physical evidence that they were in any way forced consistent with their original police complaint (both claimed they struggled).

    Both young men were exonerated by jury. Both men will not be allowed back at school after their acquittal.

    But these two cases kinda made me think that the “explosion” of rape complaints on campus are in situations where the man is beta, and after an encounter that the girl regrets is later re-imagined to be rape.

    Oh and in BOTH cases it was only after talking with “female friends” that the girl decided to file a police report.

    Liked by 1 person

    • no surprise there. is they were banged senseless by an alpha shitlord they would be on his doorsteps begging for more instead of filing charges.

      Like

      • GREG NIKOLIC says:

        Unless she discovered her alpha shitlord true-love was seeing other chicks on the side, and was contemptuously using her.

        Like

  7. The ‘rape culture’ thing is a subersive commie-faggot gimmick. From the Small Wars Journal; ”
    Changing the “Macho” Male Culture of the US Military”
    http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/changing-the-%E2%80%9Cmacho%E2%80%9D-male-culture-of-the-us-military

    Excerpt:

    Early this year I talked to another military buddy who had just left the Pentagon. His comments were even more troubling. “I used to think the Pentagon was divorced from the reality of the combat arms side of the military- that it was so out of touch with the average infantryman that it made me sick to work there,” he let on. “But that was when I first got there,” he continued. “Today it is times a hundred. The advocates of the women in combat arms are basically part of a larger effort to change the military culture- which they call a “rape culture”- and these folks are really linked close to the wider effort to change American culture.”

    I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. Since I’m quick to suspect things that sound conspiratorialist, my BS-ometer started to go off. But, then I heard the same from two other friends of mine. In essence, the idea of many of these advocates is that the American male is a, mostly unconscious, misogynist, and that it comes from our culture: movies that hype physicality, combat, aggressiveness, and the treatment of women as objects. It also comes from our military: males dominate the services, are the only ones allowed in combat arms, and thus make up most of the higher ranks. The cure for all of this is simple: change the culture.

    The “change the culture” movement has manifested itself in many ways and has taken on different efforts as well as groups that are loosely aligned towards fundamental change. On college campuses it has largely taken on the shape of the movement to end sexual harassment and sexual assault. As one professor from a prominent campus told me recently, “It isn’t really about ending sexual assault; it’s about controlling people and changing behavior. Men have the advantage in almost every way, so we have to find ways to cut into that advantage. Making traditional male behavior something that is socially unacceptable will cut their advantage. We have to make it unacceptable for men to talk the way they talk now, act the way they act now, and interact the way they do with women now, and have traditionally.” Hyping sexual assault statistics, making women fearful of men, and building a system that finds men guilty until proven innocent are simply means to the greater end of “cutting male advantage.”

    In the movie industry, change has been slower, but increasingly children’s movies depict a smart and physically strong heroine and a weak and unintelligent male. In some action films, one-hundred pound women amazingly punch two-hundred pound males so hard they kill them. The message is clear: women can do anything that men can do and it is acceptable for women to be physically aggressive and strong- men, not so much.

    For the military this means something similar. The military has also been accused of having a “rape culture” in the same manner as universities. Thus, combat arms positions are being cut while sexual harassment and assault counselors and advisers are being hired. Some see it as a cottage industry that requires a never-ending problem that has to be over-sold.

    Like

  8. tteclod says:

    I don’t generally disagree, but…

    1. The only rape that matters is regret rape. A woman won’t attempt to criminalize a sexual encounter that satisfies her goals. Therefore:

    a. If a woman is sober and she says, “Yes,” it’s rape if she changes her “yes” to “no” and you can’t convince a court otherwise.
    b. If a woman is drunk and she says, “Yes,” it’s rape if she regrets it the next day and you can’t convince a court otherwise.
    c. If a woman is sober and she says, “No,” she may just want you to assert yourself, but she might want you to assert yourself so she can claim rape later and blackmail you before eventually reporting you to the cops.
    d. If a woman is drunk and she says, “No,” she may be declining more alcohol and wanting you to bed her instead, but will probably change he mind later when she see’s you’re not Brad Pitt after all.

    “All sex is rape” -feminists

    2. My trust in my mother forever failed when she admitted that in her youth she wanted to live in a city condo with my dad sans kids. “But I really love you boys and wouldn’t change a thing,” doesn’t really correct for the admission of foul motives. So, don’t assume that “romantic trysts that… end in two kids and a house in the suburbs” will satisfy any particular woman, or that her motives for riding the cock carousel – or even just your pogo stick and none other! – remotely resemble a suburban family ideal.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Damn, I used the M word and my post got et. Ghey-ass software, WTF kind of verboten word list you carrying, CH?

      Anyway, I was telling tteclod not to be so hard on his mom… more than one young couple has claimed to not want kids… to live the bohemian dream or yuppie Mercendes-and-two-vacations-a-year life.

      But after the children come along, they learn about real life and what matters, and indeed “would not change a thing”.

      Aks me how ah knows.😉

      Like

      • tteclod says:

        There’s “stumbling into happiness” and there’s “a life of regret.” Her remarks are the latter.

        She wanted to be a Christian Gloria Steinem. She’s lived as a Christian despite herself.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I lived the Bohemian life for several years and wish I had Kids much sooner. Don’t take it quite so hard or even personally. Having lived it, I miss absolutely nothing about it and wouldn’t trade my new life for my old one ever. It has given me the advantage to be an aware father, though.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Good stuff, CD

        Like

    • -B- says:

      That’s the thoughts I had reading the post. Sensible logic has no place in the present society. As far as the courts and manipulated public opinion is concerned it is rape whenever the woman decides it is, even retroactively.

      Like

  9. Libertardian says:

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/09/21/surprise-that-will-end-trump-globalists-registering-8-million/

    There was something akin to this in 2004 called “Operation Clark County”. Hopefully this works out even better (that is, backfires even more badly).

    Like

  10. Eivind Berge says:

    This is a disappointing post which basically confuses feminist slogans with the law and doesn’t even question whether they should be the law.

    Simply saying no to sex, no matter how sincerely, does not make it rape by any reasonable definition, and indeed not even legally so except in the most extreme feminist jurisdictions (such as the UK since the Sexual Offenses Act of 2003, but not most of the US or Scandinavia, for example). Contrary to feminist slogans, most jurisdictions still require an element of coercion or unconsciousness. Verbal resistance is not enough to make it rape, because rape isn’t defined in relation to consent at all, but as sex accomplished by coercion. After all the feminist reforms to rape law, that coercion can be very trivial indeed, such as threatening to break up a relationship, but sex against a woman’s will does still not constitute rape in itself. Rape is sex *accomplished* by force, not just sex without consent. This conceptual distinction is very important, at least in theory. Rape law has been corrupted, but it hasn’t been corrupted to the extent indicated by CH in most countries including his own. Instead of embracing a definition of rape more extreme than feminists have yet managed to receive, men should be fighting for the restoration of the traditional definition which necessitated force or threats at the level of serious violence to make it rape.

    Like

  11. Libertardian says:

    ‘he sticking point for feminists, of course, is that “stopping short of drinking to oblivion” and “dressing a little more modestly than a ghetto hooker” harkens the return of a “patriarchal” culture that “places demands” on women.’

    The instant you disagree with whatever lunacy they’re pushing in the Current Year, we’ll be thrown right back to the 1950s (which as feminists all know is the exact equivalent of 1933 Germany). You don’t want Jones to come back, now do you?

    For example, not voting to legalize fourth-trimester abortions means you want women in the kitchen barefoot pregnant with black eye chained to stove and forcibly drugged with Valium.

    Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      So? Agree and amplify.

      Like

    • Haven M. says:

      “you want women in the kitchen barefoot pregnant with black eye chained to stove and forcibly drugged with Valium.”

      well, yeah. what’s the term? Christian dominance households? Bring back Ike.

      What is Lena Dunham selling, public executions for those who insult allah? Not interested.

      just kidding, but am I really…Combine 50 shades with normal society.?

      Like

    • tteclod says:

      What men want:
      Kitchen.
      Barefoot.
      Pregnant.

      Why women chase bad boys:
      Black eye.
      Chained to stove.
      Drugged.

      Like

    • itsme says:

      For example, not voting to legalize fourth-trimester abortions means you want women in the kitchen barefoot pregnant with black eye chained to stove and forcibly drugged with Valium.

      no, definitely not! ketamine works much better for this purpose.

      Like

  12. Haven M. says:

    these dumb bitches want white guys to be rapists which is why UVA was targetted by Rolling STone. All the fucking arabs and other darkies can rape all they want and the bitches won’t care.

    Some girls really hate white men. Strange it’s generally the bitches we don’t find attractive. Not quite pledge party material.

    Like

  13. Haven M. says:

    you know, I’m white…so ““dressing a little more modestly than a ghetto hooker”” isn’t really a thing. You know, you’re out a pledge party, you didn’t throw that girl through a glass beer-pong table bc she dressed like a slut.

    What i’m saying is that girls dressed hot tend to make normal guys stare but not grab. Maybe walking through Londonistan that’d be different.

    Like

  14. Carlos Danger says:

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ripp says:

      You see (((soros’))) most recent move with funding the abroad American vote?

      That guy just wants the world to burn before he dies.

      Like

  15. Abundance Mentality says:

    For a guy, the equivalent would be getting your ass kicked in a bar fight after one drink too many and mouthing off to the wrong person. You regret it in the morning but you aren’t guaranteed the police will recommend the other guy get charged with a crime and you might end up just having to learn from it not to do the same thing again.

    Like

  16. GREG NIKOLIC says:

    Delicious Tacos of delicioustacos.com has a funny true article about a woman and a man he knew in real life in Los Angeles.

    She would phone this male acquintance up and send a little signal that he should come over, no matter what, and force her into having sex. Once she hung up, that was it — it was a committed act and was inevitably going to happen. He WOULD come over, they WOULD go through the pantomime of rape, and that would be that. *dusts hands*

    The funniest comment on the whole thing was Delicious Tacos’s, though. He said, once the phone call went through, “The rape train was coming to down.”

    Ta-Hah!

    Like

  17. GREG NIKOLIC says:

    “… coming to town.” I mean. Fuck.

    I must be drunk. As whorefinder says, “Sloppiness-of-mind while texting Rape!”

    Like

  18. Nads says:

    The solution is to video every sexual encounter. Amiright?

    That will help.

    Like

  19. Anonymous says:

    “If the girl is sober and the man is too drunk to understand or give consent- how the fuck is his johnson working??”

    That’s always been my confusion with these male “rape” stories. When I’m headed toward that darkness the Governor has stopped responding to calls for at least an hour prior. I don’t agree that men can’t be raped but I don’t know how a woman can rape a passed out drunk mans penis

    Like

      • Eivind Berge says:

        The notion that women can rape men is a ludicrous category error invented by feminists (since it follows from their denial of sex differences, they have to insist on it). Women can of course commit assault and should be punished for it as far as the violence goes, but the sexual aspect does never aggravate the crime, since males have nothing sexual that can be meaningfully robbed by women. For example, the story about a man being tied up and forcibly sodomized with a dildo is indeed worthy of punishment if true, but not because it is “sex” that he didn’t want, but because it is painful. None of the other stories are convincing either as a sexual violation per se. In all cases, if you distill it down to the sexual aspect, there is no meaningful violation, and there are plenty of nonsexual laws to cover any merited punishment without pretending women can be rapists. If a man who is forced to have sex with a woman insists on pressing charges, then it should be prosecuted as simple assault or whatever fits the level of violence. If anything, the sexual aspect in female sexual coercion is a mitigating circumstance that erodes any sympathy he would get if there was no sexual motive.

        Like

      • chris says:

        “since males have nothing sexual that can be meaningfully robbed by women.”

        20% * 18-21 years worth of labour extracted through the child support regime is something they can be robbed of.

        Like

      • Pwn says:

        Eivind, so if I drug you up first and it won’t hurt because of it, sodomizing you with a dildo isn’t a crime? Lol, you’re a clown.

        Like

      • Eivind Berge says:

        Pwn, I specifically said that should be a crime, just not rape. Rape is human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless she would probably be killed or seriously injured. You can’t copulate with objects, dude. Rape requires a penis. I don’t consider penetration by a dildo to be a sexual act, and neither should the law. Are you so brainwashed by feminist propaganda that you think everything must be rape? There are other crimes, you know. How about assault and battery? A violent attack involving penetration with objects could easily be worse than rape, even when women do it, but it isn’t rape and classifying as such only makes you look stupid and detracts from the aspects that are really worthy of punishment.

        One of the stories in the link above about men supposedly “raped” by women could even be attempted murder (#5 where a woman starts strangling him during sex), which is worse than rape, yet the mangina frames it as rape because feminist propaganda is what he is engaging in.

        Like

      • Eivind Berge says:

        Yes, labor is sort of a male sexual resource that can be robbed by women via enforced child support, but again, it is stupid to categorize it as rape and pretend it literally is, as if the problem is that the man’s sexual consent has been violated… That approach is so mind-bogglingly obtuse that it can’t even distinguish between 20 years of forced labor and 5 minutes of inconvenience that doesn’t result in conception.

        A rational solution would be to grant men economic abortion rights, or at least reform child support laws to exclude children conceived by coercion. There is absolutely no need to invoke rape law or pretend women raping men is a legitimate concept.

        Like

  20. Publius says:

    Hang this (typical) Jew.

    New low: Disgraced Dem Anthony Weiner sorry after texts to 15-year-old revealed
    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/09/21/new-low-disgraced-dem-anthony-weiner-sorry-after-texts-to-15-year-old-revealed.html

    Like

    • Nads says:

      But he is such a nice Jewish boy with quite the attractive wife (who apparently he hadn’t had sex with in over a year).

      Like

    • cortesar says:

      He does perfectly embodies all of the traits of his (((tribe)))
      obnoxiousness of epic proportions, total lack of scruples, absolute and total absence of anything remotely resembling to noble, sexual perversion and of course a big hooked nose

      Like

    • Rum says:

      There several good reasons why A. Weiner should have been more circumspect about getting caught. First of all, his last name translates perfectly into English as an old and honest name for a dick.. Second, do all of that kind of stuff on TOR or some other anonymizing search program.
      Third, his name is Weiner.

      Like

    • tteclod says:

      Is Huma is clitless? She did live in KSA for a while.

      Like

  21. Hugh Jenniks says:

    Hillary didn’t care about Bill raping other women, she won’t care about refugees raping your daughter,.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. cortesar says:

    We all know that word hope is powerful pardon empowered one
    Obongo once wrote the book “Audacity of Hope” never heard somebody asking him to explain the stupidity of the title
    Hope is a passive, feminine feeling while audacity is typicality masculine and closely related to action
    Person who hopes can never be audacious that person is like a woman waiting for white knight to appear

    But there is other kind of hope
    Here

    Like

  23. But really, there’s no such thing as “rape” in a sane world.

    “Rape” is a property crime because women’s bodies should belong to fathers and husbands.

    Like

  24. Vincent says:

    Meanwhile, in Japan:

    Like

  25. Moses says:

    If feminists are truly interested in not being treated like morally undeveloped children under the law, they will agree to my definition of rape. But since feminism is about power dynamics and not at all about fairness or justice, they will never agree.

    That’s really the heart of it, iddn’t it?

    Once you understand that feminism is about subversion, power and control everything makes a lot more sense.

    Like

  26. cortesar says:

    First we take Manhattan than we take Berlin

    Cohen explained himself in a backstage interview:[1] “I think it means exactly what it says. It is a terrorist song. I think it’s a response to terrorism. There’s something about terrorism that I’ve always admired. The fact that there are no alibis or no compromises. That position is always very attractive. I don’t like it when it’s manifested on the physical plane – I don’t really enjoy the terrorist activities – but Psychic Terrorism. I remember there was a great poem by (((Irving Layton)))) that I once read, I’ll give you a paraphrase of it. It was

    “well, you guys blow up an occasional airline and kill a few children here and there’, he says. ‘But our terrorists, Jesus, Freud, Marx, Einstein. The whole world is still quaking”

    I’m guided by a signal in the heavens
    I’m guided by this birthmark on my skin
    I’m guided by the beauty of our weapons
    First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin
    …………………………
    Ah you loved me as a loser, but now you’re worried that I just might win
    You know the way to stop me, but you don’t have the discipline
    How many nights I prayed for this, to let my work begin
    First we take Manhattan, then we take Berlin

    Like

    • Amasius says:

      “The Future” is also refreshingly honest.

      Leonard lays it all out there… and no one cares. The goyim are largely too brainwashed and stupefied to do anything at this point.

      Like

      • Pwn says:

        You’re as moronic as shitlibs who use some obscure neo nazi band as evidence of some conspiracy. Your ilk deserves firing squads along the kikes for being this retarded and useful to shitlibs due to sheer idiocy.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        You have the hide to call others moronic?

        Cohen and the like have been held up as “icons of culture” and move-shaker intellectuals for over 40 years. These are the premier spokespeople for the Syn-thedral.

        That’s a lot different than some fringe neoNAH-ZEE who is marginalized into Dynamic Silence or pilloried the moment he sees any light of day.

        If you’re going to put your oar in, especially to disparage the intelligence of others, try not to be such an obvious squid inker… and foremost, try not to be an even bigger moron than those you accuse thereof.

        Geez, Louise, it’s like day one at the chateau all over again, and the alleged poon-uber-alles red-pillers are showing their blue asses.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

  27. Greg Eliot says:

    I heard that there are actually more males raped than women in ‘Murrica, ’cause prison… and the random queer pedophile stuff in which never a word about homosexuality is uttered..

    But don’t wait around for any SJWs to campaign as hard for prison reform or say boo to any queer.

    Like

    • Pwn says:

      Ending the drug war and not imprisoning dindus as much is prison reform. Not one you like, but they’re advocating something that would mitigate prison rape. I thought only shitlibs have their heads this deep in their own asses.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Pwn shows up for his usual squid inking… your ilk are not thrown in prison merely for having a bag of weed or a snort of coke, asshole.

        And if you’re trying to make a point that drug traffic is a victimless crime and no big deal, you’re even stupider than your garden variety nog.

        If anything, MORE dindus belong in prison, for all sorts of crimes… but the overcrowding is such that we’re at the point of allowing dangerous felons to roam the streets, and the ones that are inside rule the prisons.

        There are numerous solutions to the problem, but this isn’t task at hand on this thread.

        But nice try at distracting from the issue of how “rape culture” from the femcunt point of view is as much of a sham as all their other stalking points.

        Avaunt, fool.

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        “not imprisoning dindus” is not prison reform — it’s a free pass for even more black on White crime and further destruction of our society.

        Like

      • tteclod says:

        I agree. Stop imprisoning poison peddlers. End the drug war. Execute them.

        Stop imprisoning pederasts. End child abuse. Execute them.

        Duterte foe President!

        CH: Why no Duterte analysis?

        Like

  28. Johnny Redux says:

    Due to STDs that becoming more untreatable, women really need to start drinking less, and keeping the clams shut to dirty dicks. Nature’s wrath is coming, and she’s a true bitch to those who refuse to play by Her rules.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/09/21/threat-of-untreatable-gonorrhea-is-increasing-new-data-show/

    Like

  29. A Wise Man says:

    A few months ago I had an encounter with a bunch of femcunts on faceberg feigning outrage over ‘the fucking white male’ Brock Turner getting “only 90 days” for fingering some skank who was blacked out behind a dumpster on college campus. I pointed out that if she didn’t get black out drunk with no friends to look out for her it would have never happened. One can imagine the backlash that comment received, and of course there was a white knight mulatto mangina soothing the egos of these upstanding young ladies who have no problem whatsoever identifying with a blacked out drunk behind a dumpster slut. About a month after that, tagged one of the women in a post about the four black men who gang raped a white chick and urinated on her while claiming “this is for 400 years of slavery bitch!”. I also mentioned how much more violent and humiliating this rape was, and how little you hear about black on white rapes in the media. This is how the cunt responded; “What does skin color have to do with it?” My response was, “They raped her because she was white. Didn’t you listen to her story?”. At that point the mulatto mangina returned and he feigned outrage over my “focusing too much on race”. I put him in his place and he backed down quickly, but I believe I permanently alienated myself from that part of my social circle lol.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      This is what can shrivel one’s soul… these femcunts garner strong outrage against some White man for a wrongdoing, but can’t muster anything but a “don’t mention race” response at a truly heinous crime against one of their own.

      Liberalism, or whatever you want to call it, is truly a mental illness… one which will be cured, by attrition, once there’s no longer 130 channels on the dish and a stocked grocery store on every corner.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Kyo says:

        “once there’s no longer 130 channels on the dish and a stocked grocery store on every corner.”

        If only there *were* a stocked grocery store on every corner… then we’d have communities again. What we have instead, for Caucasians in particular, who are no longer welcome in the inner city, is atomized suburbia where the grocery stores are accessible only by automobile.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        A fair point, Kyo. Nay, an excellent point. +1 on you.

        Like

    • Ripp says:

      The drunk fingered girl also had a ‘boyfriend’ at the time. lolz…

      Liked by 1 person

    • tteclod says:

      Quit Facebook and you’ll discover the extent of your social circle.

      Like

  30. Wrong Side of History says:

    Swarthy, “inferior” whites like me will be the saviors of the Euro race.

    We won’t be mindfucked into self-loathe and extinction.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      That the spirit!

      When Whites are put down, our response is to “show ’em” by bootstrap effort and succeeding at whatever endeavor we put our hand to.

      Liked by 1 person

  31. Publius says:

    Niggers are begging to be wiped out.

    You’ve heard of suicide by cop?

    They hate themselves and want suicide by society on a global scale.

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2016/09/21/social-media-images-charlotte-protests/90818578/

    Like

    • itsme says:

      dindus are the only ones who riot, loot, and torch their own cities/towns/homes

      you can take the monkey out of the jungle……..

      Like

  32. Waffles says:

    A mom was inspired to lose half her body weight after her son drew her as a blob in a family portrait. She dropped half her body weight thanks to her child’s brutal honesty.

    http://archive.is/9wQ4Q

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Heh, heh… the only RealTalk they’ll take to heart is if it comes from children.

      Otherwise it’s sloughed off as “shaming”. lzozlzozlozlozlozl

      Like

  33. moderation rape! people check out front page of drudge, re. link to a video of a white man being dragged and beaten in NC

    Like

  34. Feminism is the most evil mindfvck the (((Eskimos))) unleashed upon the west. The amount of lives that have been damaged by the poisoning of the female mind is beyond measure.

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      all is fair in hatred and war, and feminism is one of the most effective biological warfare weapons ever created. don’t worry though, the )))immune response((( is already well underway. let’s see if we can get it right this time.

      if any future generations are reading this, DON’T GET SOFT!

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “all is fair in hatred and war” ——— Our problem is that none of us realized that we were at war. Pathological Altruism is a he11uva ball-n-chain to be dragging around in a pathologically dangerous world.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “Our problem is that none of us realized that we were at war.”

        yes. human biodiversity means bio-D-I-V-E-R-S-I-T-Y. which means you’re competing for survival with OTHER critters. folks thought we were all one big happy family with the same interests. nope.

        “white guilt” is just another way of saying “false sense of security” which is another way of saying “maladapted to one’s ecosystem”. you see it every day on national geographic channel, critters getting eaten when they least expect it, because they were indulging in “white guilt”.

        some always wake up though.

        Like

      • Enfant Terrible says:

        The whole thing enrages me. I am aware of the evil madness going on, but there is nothing I can do about it.

        But I hope you are right, that people are starting to wake up, and that the day of payback approaches.

        Like

    • itsme says:

      Feminism is the most evil mindfvck the (((Eskimos))) unleashed upon the west.

      every jewish man i know is a fuckin mamas boy.

      every
      single
      one

      i have to believe this shit is encoded in their genetic programming.

      Like

      • A Wise Man says:

        I think it’s spelled ‘DIE-versity’.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        It’s because they don’t believe the messiah has come yet, so they think every male child might be the one… and pamper him accordingly from the time of birth…

        … also, it’s a way to shower attention on their true love, rather than the (usually) beta schlub hubby.

        Another factor of why yentas are at the forefront of every feminist “movement” is because they’re treated like second class citizens within the orthodoxy of their own culture, up to and including separate sections in the synagogue, and days of “uncleanness” regarding their gender hammered into their psyches from the time they’re old enough to walk. Obviously, a goodly portion of them, being naturally less “pious” than the men, truly bristle deep inside at the whole schmear.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        it’s possible they’re the descendants of a matriarchal social structure, similar to hyenas. this would explain why those Neanderthal artifacts of obese females look like andrea dworkin.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        coincidence?:

        Like

    • tteclod says:

      “The whole thing enrages me. I am aware of the evil madness going on, but there is nothing I can do about it. ”

      Don’t do business with Hispanics, Blacks, Muslims, or Jews, for a start. Enter business with Asians & (dot) Indians reluctantly & as with an armed enemy.

      Coordinate business ventures and investment with family and co-ethnics.

      Expect women to be women, and treat them accordingly (and mercifully).

      Venture into public life – especially social media – VERY cautiously.

      Lift. Hunt. Garden. Cook. Build. Tinker. If you must have a “hobby,” it should feed you and your family, and build your skills.

      Adopt a primitive lifestyle adapted to a modern world. If you can live as the Amish starting tomorrow, you’ve succeeded.

      As the neoreactionaries say:
      Become worthy.
      Accept power.
      Rule.

      Like

  35. Sorry to be off topic but everyone must see this video of Hillary yelling at voters or “potential” voters.

    it is only 58 seconds.

    Hillary is losing her mind

    watch it.

    http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/2016/09/bills-wife-143.html

    Like

    • This graph shows Hillary has spent 33 times more money than Trump on advertisement.

      yet she is barely ahead by a couple points…if the polls are even accurate.

      I would think Trump will release killer advertisement a couple days before the election and he will “pulverize” Hillary.

      Like

      • Hackett To Bits says:

        Social media are having a field day with that video… she looks and sounds exactly like a newly divorced woman who got the short end of the deal. Shouting Hillary is back!

        The polls are neither the complete truth nor a complete lie, but as with seduction, facts and logic don’t matter anyway. Clinton projects a fear of imminent loss; Trump has a rock solid frame. That’s all people need to sense.

        The first debate will be her final nail.

        Like

      • Amasius says:

        It’s an asymmetrical warfare campaign. Don’t fire til you see the whites of their eyes.

        Like

      • Hillary’s campaign/Hillary’s popularity is on life support, maintained alive artificially.

        Like

    • Ripp says:

      looks like she’s hopped up on amphetamines.

      Like

    • tteclod says:

      A comment from your link:

      “Absolutely hilarious. The very first thing that came to mind when I saw this clip, was that Hillary is a dead ringer for automaton “Balok”, in the original Star Trek episode “The Corbomite Maneuver”. “

      Like

  36. chris says:

    @ CH

    You made a post about survey results and homophilia and miscegenation and how you cannot trust them?

    Well here you go;

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304491556_Yuck_You_Disgust_Me_Affective_Bias_Against_Interracial_Couples

    The current research expands upon the sparse existing literature on the nature of bias against interracial couples. Study 1 demonstrates that bias against interracial romance is correlated with disgust. Study 2 provides evidence that images of interracial couples evoke a neural disgust response among observers – as indicated by increased insula activation relative to images of same-race couples. Consistent with psychological theory indicating that disgust leads to dehumanization, Study 3 demonstrates that manipulating disgust leads to implicit dehumanization of interracial couples. Overall, the current findings provide evidence that interracial couples elicit disgust and are dehumanized relative to same-race couples. These findings are particularly concerning, given evidence of antisocial reactions (e.g., aggression, perpetration of violence) to dehumanized targets. Findings also highlight the role of meaningful social units (e.g., couples) in person perception, an important consideration for psychologists conducting social cognition research.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Somebody remember these studies about disgust response the next time some shill tries to claim that the plethora of mixed-race couples in ads is because “it sells”.

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        the disgust goes only one direction, which is why “it sells”… if you’re lower down on the human heirarchy dating up doesn’t disgust you. and that new T-Mobile phone will help you get there.

        Like

      • chris says:

        I think the study also showed black men were disgusted as well, albeit less than white men,

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Again, nobody doubts that “it sells” to the male n1gger demographic.

        The point is, you can’t convince me that Corporate America targets the demographic with the highest unemployment and incarceration rates, let along thievery rates, in their audience… at the expense of the White demographic or the negro female demographic… the two groups where the actual spending money resides.

        This ISN’T an economic decision, boys… stop trying to rationalize it as such.

        Like

Leave a Reply