Salon, the nation’s hindmost menstrual rag of note, stumbled onto Chateau Heartiste grounds and promptly WOWJUSTWOWed until they were overcome with shameful orgasms.
18 hilariously terrible sex tips that all men should ignore. […]
3. “A woman may want financial and family security, but she does not want passion security. In the same manner, when she has displeased you, punish swiftly, but when she has done you right, reward slowly.” (Chateau Heartiste, pickup artist site)
It works for the Dog Whisperer so it must be true.
In fact, successfully dating women and dog training do share quite a few disturbing similarities.
Naturally, the vapid Salon entity has no rebuttal to offer other than lazy snark.
6. “Flirt with other women in front of her. Do not dissuade other women from flirting with you.Women will never admit this but jealousy excites them. The thought of you turning on another woman will arouse her sexually.” (Cheateau Heartiste)
Of course women (and men) [ed: no, men don’t viscerally respond to jealousy incitement the same way women do] want their partner to be perceived as desirable to others. But intentionally trying to make your partner jealous is a pathetic power trip used by the most insecure. And no, women “will never admit” it because it’s not true. Just like men “will never admit” they love surprise anal.
Women who deign to write for globally transmitted magazines really need to begin the arduous task of reading subject matter outside their feminist automaton comfort zones. For instance, CH is not the only one to observe through direct experience that women’s arousal and jealousy are two sides of the same coin; studies have found over and over that “female preselection” — that is, a man’s social and romantic approval by other women — acts directly as an attraction stimulant on any women in his company. Unlike this Salon broad’s non sequitur about “surprise anal” (which, as if it needed to be said, few heterosexual men outside the Salon staff hothouse of lactating manboobs secretly desire), making a woman jealous is proven to work as a means of increasing her romantic arousal. A man deploying such a tactic may or may not be “insecure”, but there’s no arguing with results.
8. “Give your woman two-thirds of everything she gives you. For every three calls or texts, give her two back. Three declarations of love earn two in return. Three gifts; two nights out. Give her two displays of affection and stop until she has answered with three more. When she speaks, you reply with fewer words. When she emotes, you emote less… In her deepest loins it is what she truly wants.” (Chateau Heartiste)
And if she responds with one word, reply with a series of monosyllabic grunts or through miming. She thinks she’s got you in a box, but little does she know, it’s INVISIBLE. Treating every exchange with women like a manipulative math problem is ¾ stupid, ⅝ sad, and 100 percent guaranteed to make you into an ex variable.
Math is hard.
Also, did he just call my loins shallow?
Women should avoid trying to be funny altogether and stick to maximizing the return on their authentically valuable assets. That would be your tits, ass, face and pussy, in case you were wondering.
A word of advice, Salonista: Humorless reductio ad absurdum and inapt mischaracterizations are no way to win debate points.
There’s a reason “mainstream” feminists rarely confront the House of Heartiste head on, preferring instead to snipe futilely from a safe and plausibly deniable distance (see: Lindy “Huge Fat Fuck” West), protectively ensconced by an army of reject freaks spit-shining feminist taint. When an unfortunate representative of their diseased order attempts an ill-prepared direct assault on CH, mistakenly presuming her enemy is a chucklehead bro who can’t wield a shiv like an assassin, she is typically flayed alive and retreats in shock with her fat beaver tail tucked between her ham hocks, never to be heard from again. So they will continue to toss feeble snark turds from their internet hovels while CH continues tearing apart everything they believe and hold dear, sinew by sinew, until the last of them self-delivers or sticks it out in everlasting torment to enjoy her gradual soul-desiccating abandonment by those she considers respectable discourse gatekeepers.
And the more they do this, the more blue pillers head over and begin to see the light . . . er dark of the dark enlightenment.
This poor girl is pretty schizo.
Here’s her “Bio”:
http://annapulley.com/bi-o/
And here’s a blurb about her at the Sun Times:
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ourtown/2012/04/the_hot_chicago_writer_blog_3.html
Honestly, just from perusing what little there is to peruse at those two links, I kinda feel sorry for her.
She’s probably an SSRI or Adderall prescription away from needing full-time institutionalization.
The Innate White Knight in me finds it kinda tough to rag too hard on the ones who are actually nuts.
[CH: Her evisceration is an example for the others; namely, Salon honchos who insist on hiring this detritus to represent their shitlib brand. There is no safe haven anymore. The front lines are everywhere.]
Here’s her “Bio”:
Note the short hair. And then read her reply to the suggestion that short-haired women are deranged. lzozlozlzozz
Is it just me or does she actually look like a dog?
I was actually thinking about setting her up with Heartiste, on a date, and then he could report back as to whether or not she was multi-orgasmic or simply just frigid.
Shivving the frigid bitches is worse than just whacking off.
I can see it. Although I really expected her to be uglier, like the fatty sucking down the sundae from the FB post.
If she were straight she’d be worth a hail mary last call pump ‘n dump.
She is certainly a bitch.
What breed are you thinking of?
I’d go with unshaggable.
Canardlie
She looks more like the ass of an hamster.
Her face has some disturbing lines… fuck!
She looks more like that extinct lesbian dinosaur… Licktalottapus.
Yeah… that Dykeasaurus is just not attractive. But then again, she’s not exactly dolling up. Maybe some dude should fuck her so she’s inclined to look better.
> ” Salon honchos who insist on hiring this detritus”
http://www.salon.com/about/staff/
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Technology Officer
Cindy Jeffers – JEWESS
Interim Chief Financial Officer
Elizabeth Hambrecht – JEWESS
Vice President, Sales
Matthew Sussberg – JEW
Director of Product
Rachel Hagen – likely a JEWESS
Associate Managing Editor
Ruth Henrich – JEWESS
Plus some Southern Irish Papist drunks, with names like Daley and O’Donoghue.
From the blurb:
“Anna writes a weekly sex advice column for the Chicago Tribune’s RedEye, despite having sex about four times a year.”
She has a ton of experience with giving advice in areas she doesn’t have experience in. AKA, talking out her ass.
That’s kinda the point because all the neurotic broads who read that crap identify with her. Kinda like how many stand-up comedians are ugly.
lol true though
What is it with feminists going around talking like they’re the expert on what all women want? Anna looks too ugly to be regarded seriously.
Say again, for SRS:
The value of a woman’s dating opinion is directly correlated to how desirable she is.
That’s what feminism is, a shallow discipline accredited by self appointed experts for self appointed experts.
And even then…
But now, seriously, I don’t care how beautiful a woman is when she airs an opinion or a thought.
I just think that, when women start spewing shit like this, shit that overflows and corromps society, shuttering lives of way too many to count…
well, then, I think that a girl spewing this kind of shit to such a wide audience should be punished in accordance to how ugly she is,
that is,
accordingly to how much a piece of shit she is and how much she is uncapable of giving any pleasure or contribution to society.
Punch her face.
Insert your fist in her vagina and pull her outwards.
She IS the kind of person who MUST be punished for the sake of all of us. Including our daughters / sisters / grand nieces, etc. Future of present.
corromps = corrosive burn
My english was better when I was younger.
shuttering = shattering
Why are feminists pretending to care about men being romantic failures? “Do this and you’ll be dumped!”,say the femimists.Fems lay awake at night worrying about our stiffies? “gee I hope men out there are getting pussy…”
They’re not thinking at all of the men. They are thinking of their wives and girlfriends. It’s herd mentality.
to be fair, i think her denial of the jealousy/arousal thing might be sincere. as ugly as she is (2, maybe a 3?), flirting with other (prettier) women in front of her might be more likely to make her insecure. so of course she accuses such men of being insecure…
I’m worried about this one.
I hope she’s sufficiently mentally stable to hold up to the barrage from the Chateau.
She might literally crack under the strain of it.
I’ll try to remember to say a little prayer for her tonight.
Yes, it is very much like this Qi Gong Kaia Master who, for years, believed he had supernatural bullshit powers due to legions of Kareteka Yes-Men fake-fighting him like you would a 5 year old playing Batman.
Only to meet a real MMA fighter who didn’t get the memo.
VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wd7M4H0b62k
These womyn have such a sickening air of superiority yet often have never walked even 10 feet (let alone a mile) in the high heels of SMV 7+ women. They speak from such a position of haughty self-righteousness and arrogance, yet.have less lifetime experience dealing with men’s advances and desires than many HBs have by the time they are 18 years old.
For such womyn, hearing such truths spoken raw and unfiltered, putting into intelligently-spoken words the reality that the deep recess of their brain knows to be the harsh truth, is often a very painful, jagged pill to swallow.
But I’m worried about this one.
I feel like it’s more than just the standard issue femcunt hatefulness – where the Frankfurt School inculcates that pavlovian response in them so that they get all vicious like pitbulls when crossed.
This one strikes me as being pretty badly mentally ill – and rather mentally unstable.
They’re pissed. What do you expect? Actually, she makes herself unattractive. She has nice facial features and with a good re-make would shine right up. However, what she does with her looks is reflective of her inner conflicts.
There’s something of Jessica Biel in her eyes and face. I think she could really enhance that with longer hair.
Actually, there’s something of the über-bish in her eyes.
Pass… I don’t care how much of a makeover you give her.
And go tend to your kitchen, woman.
> “something of Jessica Biel”
It’s that puffy bottom lip.
Collagen was what I immediately wondered about.
But maybe it’s natural?
Her stare is unnatural, though, as if she’s complete nuts or on some heavy-duty psychotropics or both.
All the same, she seems to have a lot of Daddy rage.
Wut? She should kill herself
> “She should kill herself”
C’mon, man, that’s exactly what I’m talking about.
Don’t joke about that shit when you’re dealing with someone who is so obviously unstable.
why?
… you fairy.
Hat tip to Greg Eliot
I notice no info on her age.
From the second link, I provide the following quote, which establishes plenty.
” My guilty pleasure book: That would be, Dark Angels. Otherwise known as lesbian vampire erotica. If you replace “guilty” with “self,” that is.”
Skip the rest.
She’s also bisexual. She’s just too smart to fuck only men.
FM, this chick is nuts.
Have you tried to read any of her essays?
Looney Tunes.
And CH is a tad more than a pickup site. To rediscover the truth after years of being marinated in lies allows the converted to walk again with dignity. The war continues. http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentaries/246573711.html
I’m surprised they even linked your blog. With all the other PC unfriendly topics covered, you’d think they’d stay away period.
She’s getting paid. That’s her weakness. She has to generate readers, churn. Even at the expense of selling out the cause.
She never believed the cause anyway. Feminism doesn’t really excite passion in women, that’s why it is pushed on them so hard.
This is the type of thing that makes me feel like we still live in a free country. I’ve gotten some people to start reading CH, and I know it’s resonating. At the end of the day, it’s in the DNA of men to not want to be shit all over and to triumph and succeed at life. I’ll be damned if we let the Cathedral win…that shit is gradually crumbling and about to fall down.
The lure of attention vs hiding this information from her readers; most of the time attention is going to win.
Exactamundo! The only ones that can actually pull off that Dynamic Silence technique are its originators of the masculine gender.
“Women should avoid trying to be funny altogether and stick to maximizing the return on their authentically valuable assets. That would be your tits, ass, face and pussy, in case you were wondering.”
We Leg Men are a dying breed.
[CH: Legs are an extension of the ass. Act locally, think holistically.]
I’m always thinking holeistic, so pussy, mouth, ass it is (order chosen arbitrarily).
No we’re not Krul, we know which end of the women creates the babies.
Most of the self-styled PUAs around here couldn’t tell arse from quim.
Legs are an extension of the ass. Act locally, think holistically.
Now, that’s droll… (((golf clap)))
Gee wiz, this article is brutal, feels like reading the fundamental premise again
[CH: Tough love. Nah, who am I kidding? This was pure sadistic fun.]
Be prepared for “Heartiste and by Extension, The Manosphere, be Racist!!!” headline.
[CH: The problem with this counterinsurgency tactic is that CH will hit back, unlike the usual reflexive response of pseudo-cons who prostrate with haste before the leftoid whine machine.]
I like how ROK is doing feminist exposes on femmy automatons that attack the manosphere. Like Anil or this thing, rebecca sparrow:
http://www.returnofkings.com/28559/why-is-rebecca-sparrow-attacking-young-moms-for-staying-slim-and-pretty
I mean, wow, just wow. Way to take someone apart.
Yeah that’s a great one. I sent a message to the author using my real name thanking him.
It is what, ultimately, puts you head and shoulders above the rest. The ability to speak the truth, supposedly protected by Ammendment One, is being eroded.
All Speech is Equal, but some Speech is more Equal than Other Speech.
I’ve already HTTracked your site and IrishSavants too. Because why? Ya’ll niggas may end up in jail in 2014. If so, I will carry the torch until I go back to jail (again!) and someone else mirrors the websites.
Might be time to look into namecoin… It’s like Bitcoin for your dns. Doesn’t go through icann..
.bit addresses should be a lot harder to take down by arbitrary Cathedral dictate.
Henchman standing by the ready.
Good for you guys. May The Force be with you.
Its been taken off line.
[CH:
]
That’s their only recourse when people disagree with them. That or turning off comments.
I think they’re clever enough to take out direct links from CH, because it still seems to be on the web. Just archived the page at wayback in case it’s removed for good.
http://web.archive.org/web/20140221225703/http://www.salon.com/2014/02/21/18_hilariously_terrible_sex_tips_that_all_men_should_ignore_partner/
They weren’t clever enough to not include the links in the first place.
Seems to be online now at CH’s link, but no comments under the article, hm why?
Feminism as ideology is held by the undesirables.
Feminism as fashion is held by the rest.
[CH: Mock feminism until it becomes unfashionable, and its ideological component will wither in step.]
To be completely successful, you’ll have to mock the underlying Judaism of the folks who invented feminism.
Zombie Shane, Why you are a White?
Dear Wasabi-Taco,
Please go away until you can troll in comprehensible English, or I will cuntpunt you.
xoxo,
driveallnight
Lolz, I see you didn’t understood properly my question, it wasn’t simple about the obvious like “because my parents are White duh or because I am not Black” ,it was deep and philosophical, I tried to say if he believes he is White because some kind of destiny, eh?
How many names jewgot?
Jew don’t wanna know.
As many names as the poster with a Brown avatar, high five to him.
It’s pretty easy to be fashionable about Feminism when its gets all the rules bent in your direction.
well, lets be honest. feminism exists much like religion does, as a control and shaming (or shamuing?) mechanism that allows access to mating opportunities for the fatties and fugugs, in direct conflict to the pretty girls at the top of the food chain.
you can’t blame them for trying to take what power they can convince men to give them can you?
poor little cretinous skanks, it’s all they can do or hope to have. i just feel bad for em.
and it has NADA to do with men.
I doubt that. It’s the beta males who are losing out relatively, not the pretty girls. It’s not like they could convince men to find uggos and fatties desirable.
i should have been clearer. the war is a proxy really, beta males are say, vietnam, while america and russia are the ladiez.
It aint working.
no doubt.
linking here on any of these sites is a bad a idea. how did I discover Le chateau? I liked reading Jezebel because at least it (unlike much of the media) acknowledged gender. they linked here, and it immediately clicked, describing exactly what I did unconsciously in my 2 1/2 year relationship which was not just good but fantastic.
once a man has reached 25 years old, he has had enough experiences that the truth presented here rings true, it just gives him a language to express what he already deep down knows. I’ll bet just the links in this article result in a few hundred new pupils.
I found Kim Du Toit’s old site the same way. Some Lefty site was whining about “The Pussification of The Western Male” and I followed the link. His was the first website I’d ever read that left me feeling better for having read it, rather than wondering what the fuck was wrong with everyone everywhere.
I found this site because a woman in the comment section of a political blog was complaining about the fact all the men she meets are influenced by CH.
I had to know what she was talking about, my inquisitive mind brought me here, and I never left
For real? Damn we’re mainstream yo!
I found this site after black people kicked me off their blogs because they said I was racist (white).
Telling the truth = racism
I found this site when one of those black bloggers sent me a Moon Pie and a bottle of grape drank if I would come to the chateau and deride thwack’s white racism.
Nobody loves me. Its because Im black isn’t it?
buddhuu
Some trolls seem to specialise in being irrationally and childishly rude to women.
————————————————————————————————
Some men seem to specialise in being weak and flacid to women in the hopes of “getting some”; yet all they ever get is an empty wallet and a blue sack.
buddhuu
@ thwack:
You are a poisonous, nasty piece of work.
—————————————————————————————————-
buddhuu, you do not yet realize your importance. You have only begun to discover your power. Join me, and I will complete your training. With our combined strength, we can end this destructive conflict and bring order to this blog.
Search your feelings, you know it to be true.
Herneith
@thwack:
Listen Uncle Thomas, your misogyny towards black women is showing. There is no call to resort to such insults.
—————————————————————————————————-
Be silent woman. Your vanity and insufferable hypergamy are the reason we are in the position we are in today; its not the white man, it you and your big mouth; you just won’t listen to ANYBODY except thugs, players and SERPENTS.
“Unto the woman he said, I will greatly increase thy sorrows, and thy conceptions. In sorrow shalt thou bring forth children, and thy desire shall be subject to thine husband, and he shall rule over thee.”
I found this site while reading Steve Sailers blog;it was whiskey that mentioned it in one of his rants about how women hate,hate hate beta males.
I also found CH through Sailer, who I’ve read for years. The first few times that I saw commenters there talking alpha/beta I just skimmed over the jargon, not quite knowing what was being described but not quite wondering either. When I realized that the guys were skewering feminism, I got to reading and never looked back. As for finding Sailer, it was by way of VDARE. As for finding VDARE it was by way of reading Chronicles, who are among the only conservative foundations to oppose third-world immigration pretty much since it started to go forward in the ’70′s. Nationalism entails anti-immigrationism, anti-immigrationism entails acknowledging HBD/IQ polemics, acknowledging HBD/IQ polemics usually produces awareness of, and excoriation of, feminism and by that time, you are well on your way to debunking the whole Cathedral.
Such surprise: http://annapulley.com/bi-o/
Yup. She has short hair. Basically her whole article was “I”M NOT UGLY!”
I just WOWJUSTWOWed at the last paragraph.
Brogasm is another way to put it.
She looks every bit of snarky, unbearable cunt as her writing suggests.
Wait til she approacheth…the WALL!!!
Clearly the chick never watched the Dog Whisperer. The whole show was that little spic teaching beta male fags how to alpha up and control their bitches. It works exactly the same way with women.
Yeah, but his skill with hounds didn’t translate to his own wife… sigh… when I heard about that mess, I had the same “Say it ain’t so, Joe!” reaction as that little kid of yesteryear upon hearing of the Black Sox scandal.
Cesar’s a classic “alpha with the job, beta with the wife” kind of guy. In today’s world, it is promoted to run your business as the boss, but yet, somehow, you’re no longer king of your own castle. Used to be Don Draper-esque: your attitude at home was to be the same as your attitude at work.
Plus, Cesar was getting tons of come -ons due to fame from his show. Every chick in America with a dog, and every middle aged housewife especially, wanted his beta-cock due to fame. Unlike a true alpha, he couldn’t keep the wife in line with his philandering.
When my young cousin asked me about picking up girls, I explained to him there were two routes: “1. You can learn red-pill game, master it, and, in a few years, can cold-approach women all the time and get some from them; or 2. buy a guitar.”
Cesar’s a classic “alpha with the job, beta with the wife” kind of guy.
I’ll never understand such men.
It’s not actually that hard, just hard for us nowadays to get. When societies starting pairing men and women off in married pairs, the guys/God who came up with the idea knew that most men, by definition, were beta, and most women, by nature, wanted only alpha. So they set up all sorts of rules to make the wife beta to the husband by law, so she would look up to the husband, while teaching the husband rules to run his wife by and be more alpha. One only has to look at the Bible n to see how central ruling your wife was to a happy society, and how most men needed to be taught how to do it.
In jobs, too, many betas can and are trained in leadership courses to make them more socially alpha, or at least less beta. Leadership can be learned, and is very useful for a business. Good militaries could train their brightest betas into alphas.
The problem is that society today looks very much down on men ruling at home, so such training is shit upon. Men enter marriages as betas at home and stay that way, and women do not expect the men to rule over them.
This is why marriage in the U.S. is fucked.
I trying to teach mankind around me last few years, ” watch Cesar and learn how to deal with women and children. ”
Somehow .. 99% thinks I’m a rude-macho-egoist-chauvinist .. and more,
1% thinks i’m just plane crazy
Salon and the Chateau are my two favorite websites….go figure.
The worst insult was including your pointers with those from Men’s Health, which is run by women and has a “feminist” blog :
http://blogs.menshealth.com/mh-feminist/
I understand the hate from Salon and HuffPo and all those other MSM rags but what I can’t grasp is dismal of Libertinism from places like Vice. Vice supposedly is a alt news and subculture site. Libertinism should be right up their alley.
Just goes to show you that there is hard cutoff which women simply won’t accept. They will go along with cutting up their bodies and printing all over them, doing copious amounts of hard drugs and fucking like bunnies if they are of wild nature but they draw the line in the sand when faced with conscious hard red pill knowledge of the brutality of Darwinian intersexual relations
By the way, that’s what I’m calling CH’s ethos now. It’s neo-Libertinism. Much more accurate description than Manosphere or Alt Right. It’s good old Marquis De Sade, John Wilmot reborn. Biting social commentary aimed at fucking with the established while at the same time gleaning from the entertainment and cultural events they provide.
Vice is just mildly quirky shit that stays well within the bounds of political correctness. No real edge there.
It’s obviously a propaganda organ.
I never heard of libertinism but I just checked it out and appreciate it more than the subtly different philosophy of hedonism.
Ive got one of those hanging between my legs.
A libertine is someone who doesn’t have any moral restraints. If that’s what you think CH is about, you haven’t read carefully enough.
Re- Asperger’s in women tweet – I think I should quote that back to you next time you call me a spergy droid.
[CH: Why? Are you also a cute girl?]
Baby, I want 2 be so cute 4 u.
“Once you’ve blown someone while also consuming your daily dose of carbohydrates at the same time, then we’ll talk about “skills,” okay?”
skrillex hair be damned, would bang
Wait, semen is carbs now?
I’m imagining a sort of trencher-like arrangment.
Yes Cynthia a woman must exercise after she swallows.
Woman! Nunnery! Get thee hence!
At the nunnery she’ll be eating pussy.
Pretty sure that only happens in porn… you ever seen a real-life nun?
It’s mostly protein and it’s low calorie also. She’s clueless.
” But intentionally trying to make your partner jealous is a pathetic power trip used by the most insecure. ”
Lol, the province of women is to talk as if words have power. DON’T DO THAT BECAUSE ONLY LOSERS DO THAT. Hahahahaha. May as well read ‘oh my god, don’t abuse your powweeeer over me, please donnnn’t, but I love it sooooooooooooo.’
On a more serious note, being honest and realistic about the world allows you to wade through so much bullshit. It’s incredible. You understand relationships, dynamics, “blue pill speak.”
It’s arguable whether she loves it.
It’s certain that she loves you if you do it.
The Dog Whisperer is a bizarre snipe considering his absolutely atrocious divorce rape that led to a suicide attempt.
I could compile an art exhibition of all the strawmen in their “arguments”.
(in response to CH’s 2/3rd rule)
“And if she responds with one word, reply with a series of monosyllabic grunts or through miming. She thinks she’s got you in a box, but little does she know, it’s INVISIBLE. Treating every exchange with women like a manipulative math problem is ¾ stupid, ⅝ sad, and 100 percent guaranteed to make you into an ex variable.
Also, did he just call my loins shallow?”
They willingly ignored that CH said the rule was more like a general concept than a spergy calculation.
Today’s Washington Post Style section offers a new entry to Carolyn’s Greatest Hits.
In today’s unbelievable (or all too believable) episode, a man is shamed for his fear that his promiscuous girlfriend will remain promiscuous…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/carolyn-hax-she-says-shes-moved-beyond-her-past-infidelities-can-he-believe-her/2014/02/20/fce38c6c-8dc7-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html
The obfuscating wordiness reminded me of her most astounding advice in memory, in which a…
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/washington-post-fembot-tells-cuckold-suck-it-up/
Anyone see this Pulley broad that wrote the piece? A repulsive creature to be sure. I left a message asking why she felt the need to write an article about the given topic seeing as she was gross and no one wants to pump her anyhow.
Wtf…this c#nt has links to articles about sex toys, “transphobia” (horror!), queer lexicon and helping a shriveled 45 yr old menoharpie procure ‘anonymous sex” (something her f$g male readers know all about).
All our so called mainstream so called media is all deviant, Israeli and misfit occupied territory…..
Been dropping the hammer on black academic simps and their white liberal sympathizers over on another blog:
buddhuu
@ thwack:
You are a poisonous, nasty piece of work.
—————————————————————————————————-
Takes bow, blows kisses to crowd from balcony
LOL
Heavy moderation including deletions for something they call “mock ebonics”.
Its interesting because you don’t even realize you used ebonics until they delete your comment?
You guys must be putting a severe beatdown on simple niggers because now ni66ers have banned niggers from using ebonics?
Dafuq?
Thats all some ni66ers know?
you guys livin rent free in ni66as skulls, kinda cramped ain’t it?
(((SMMFH)))
I cheated on a LTR. LTR found out. Got the best annal sex from LTR for weeks (she did not like annal before). Married said LTR for 22 years with zero issues. I provide the security, she provides the “home life”. End story. Happy in life.
Latvian: “I’m dating someone”
Me: “right”
Her: “Just thought you should know”
I ask how long and she says more than a year.
We had been talking about the gross girls on campus with body hair and she said that didn’t bother her, so when she told me how long she was dating whoever I said, “someone’s gotta date the hairy legged girls. Ty for saving the pretty girls for me”
Now, she never expressed interest in a relationship, and I didn’t either. She was up front about the “drinking buddies” thing, but I just call bullshit on it.
More than a year and you’re going out with a guy on Tinder? Letting him touch you? Texting and calling, asking to hang out? Invited me over again today.
Actions don’t quite match words here.
I haven’t been clingy. There’s no jumping when she says to jump or anything like that.
Crazy Eastern European stripper… Sorry to go on and on with this issue. My hamster is calmed and there are a few left in the kitty. I just think she’s pretty cool.
Point and sputter is all they have left.
The negative reaction by feminist dipshits and associated asslickers is likely because the uncomfortable truths pointed out by CH and astute commenters force an honest self-assessment. Few women, especially the ugly ones, truly want a long hard (heh) look in the mirror regarding the facts about human behavior. Forcing them to confront biological differences produces the illogical backlash we laugh and shake our heads at. Arguing with a feminist is like arguing with a feral cat: you make a valid point, they respond with hissing and shrieking.
I like that the CH site is being viewed by the masses. Getting some of these uncomfortable truths out in the open is going to be painful for exactly the people it should hurt. Thanks to CH for sharing that hilarious gnashing of teeth.
That is an absolutely necessary next step
Good strides have been made in bypassing Cathedral grip over MSM in last 10 or more years thanks to WWW
For instance, take the comment section of any MSM media and read it before it is censored and compare to the one of 10 years ago.
Sometimes we do not appreciate enough how much has been done by blogs like this one.
Let me paraphrase Victor Hugo
———————————————————————————————–
You can fight against strong armies standing on you borders but you cannot fight an idea which time has come
———————————————————————————————–
The time has come, they know it, they feel it, they fear it
But they ain’t seen nothing yet
Amen. I truly believe things are coalescing in the right way to tear down feminism and political correctness. At some point, a critical mass will be reached and feminism will be as doomed, irrelevant and obscure as the KKK.
Yep. I’m seeing it over and over again, even on brainless shit like Yahoo stories. It’s wildly different from even a year ago. Female supremacy is no longer unquestioned. The question is what happens now.
It’s sort of funny. She’s decrying these tactics as ineffective, while she rises to their bait in the most pathetic way possible, using “but I’m sexy and pretty too!” as a defense. Almost as if… it works…
Here are two positive comments for the Alternet article.
1. After a side-by-side comparison, I am confident my time is best spent reading CH and ignoring Men’s Health.
2. Never mind, I only had one.
A leftist homosexual who pretends it can tell women what they should want. Ridiculous. The Salon leftists exposed themselves as liars when they quickly took down the story once it was countered by Chateau Heartiste. Sheeple who first read the Salon’s piece and then went here would see the rebuttal, complete with scientific backing, and immediately see how ridiculous the leftist homosexual’s smear attempt was. Another victory for realism.
Anna Pulley the Ugly writes extremely bad pieces, simply sticking to whatever is Politically Correct so she never has to prove anything she says. It is still really bad writing. For example, look at this:
“Bisexual, for better or for worse, is what we have, but until and unless it can be wrested from the trenches of misinformation, stereotypes, and discrimination, I expect its downward trend to keep heading that way, in favor of different words, sentences, mish-mashes, and reconfigurations, the mutability of desire proving once again that it won’t be contained.
Until then, I’m sticking with, “My heart is gay, but my vagina is less discriminatory.””
Gasp! “misinformation,” “stereotypes,” “discrimination”. Oh, sure, homosexuals are so discriminated against, right? False. They are given a privileged position by the media owners. How many homosexuals are there in the Salon staff, and how many homo critics? Yeah, thought so.
And who is dumb enough to write a phrase like “my vagina is less discriminatory”? What “woman” writes a phrase like that if she has any decency or self-respect? Does she even have enough intelligence to understand that she sounds like a retard?
protip:
if you are gonna bang married broads, make sure they are mormons. crazy wild, hot as hell, and respond to dominance like nothing ive ever seen. just play the yareally non-judgmental card. freeeeeaaakkkks.
“Treating every exchange with women like a manipulative math problem is ¾ stupid, ⅝ sad, and 100 percent guaranteed to make you into an ex variable.”
I’m 2/3rds certain she was furiously flicking her grizzle whilst replying to your site.
That last paragraph was devastating. Any feminist reading it must feel like William Wallace in the last scene of Braveheart.
Wallace died for a cause. He chose it. You’re insulting him.
Cow, just cow!
She’s not fat, but her future will increasingly become meow, just meow.
If it isn’t already right meow.
These people live in a fairy tale world where the natures of men and women are identical. The idea of men needing advice because women differ so markedly is enough to anger them. But when you go further and imply that women are essentially masochistic and naturally subservient, as is done in most of the axioms they quoted, steam shoots out their ears.
Sadly (for them), their worst fears are confirmed when a shitty novel like 50 Shades of Grey sparks a worldwide lady-fapping epidemic. I haven’t read the loathsome book, but from the 500,000 articles written about it I understand it’s about a billionaire who tortures a sweet young virgin (say what you want about men, their apparent perversion, and their porn collections, but, serial killers excluded, we aren’t pulling pud to torture).
The lady author inadvertently highlights a difference between the sexes when she includes men in her statement about people wanting their partners to be desirable to others. Personally, I would want all the men around me to think my girlfriend was a dog; then I’d know they wouldn’t pursue her. Unless I surround myself with unhealthies, however, that is unlikely to happen. She does herself position further harm by saying the don’t-call-for-3-days rule is good in that it prevents you from looking overeager. If a man thought a woman was hot, he would love her to be overeager. By contrast, a man will lose a degree of hotness in a woman’s eyes if he is overeager.
Feminists are the ones who crave alpha cock the most. This article may have just been a way to bring herself to alpha attention. She probably fantasises about being your sex slave, Heartiste.
obviously all this exposure means the great laws like the 2/3 is being exposed slowly to the female masses. But I guess this was all inevitable.
Plus a CH vs lamestream media fight sounds more enticing, as ROK is all over the place with less bite.
@yule “exposing” the laws to female masses doesn’t matter to them. Women aren’t logical. I’ve explained attraction and game to girls in terms of evolutionary psychology. They don’t understand it. They are more sensing and feeling rather than intuitive. You can explain it and they may believe that they cannot be seduced, then suddenly you neg them, push-pull and it’s like a cat with a ball of yarn….they just play along. They can’t help themselves. The more self-aware women will say “grow a pair”…the less self-aware will just know why they don’t find a guy attractive.
Red-pill consists of
(1) exposure of true cause-and-effect in what women react to, and
(2) logical reactions / strategies responding to the new information in (1).
Sites like CH provide true cause-and-effect in what men like us will do. We are quite honest. We are not lying to women who post here or any other women who read us. We have no shame, we’re proud of it.
So the women should logically plan THEIR counter move. Where is it? There’s nothing but bitching and moaning.
WGTOW? Not a bit of it. They don’t embrace spinsterism, they bitch whenever we mention their risk of it and our lack of further interest in protecting them from it.
Ladies, it’s your move.
Let me suggest: become more feminine and honest, and grab a good man young and hold onto him. I think that will work.
“Ladies, it’s your move.”
Now where have I heard that before?
It’s Your Move: How to Play the Game and Win the Man You Want: Nick Savoy: 9781609413989: Amazon.com: Books
Dang. Sorry, CH, I didn’t realize it was going to come up that way.
The more I read about game and also put the ideas into practice the more I realize that stories like the OP come from a place where there is a clear misunderstanding or lack of knowledge of Evolutionary Psychology.
When I’m gaming girls, after sparking attraction and we’re playing the Questions Game: she asks me something, I ask her something, I will ask her “Do you know the 3 elements of attraction?” It’s fascinating, they never answer correctly. It’s always “Good looking?” or they fumble around.
When I go through it: Leader of men, protector of women and children, pre-selected by other women—they ALL get it.
Logically that doesn’t make sense but when you understand the triggers and where it comes from it’s obvious.
The last part “Pre-selected” is an element but of course it depends on a combination of the other 2. The push-pull of the neg etc etc.
Also, there is a huge misunderstanding that game is just to bang tons of chicks while the concept of “inner game” is ignored in those mainstream or feminist pieces.
I prefer to talk about game with people who are genuinely interested in its principles or have stories or questions to share. Stories like the Salon one are a way of shaming betas into submission. “I’m not like THOSE chauvinistic jerks…” Stories like that lead to disappointment on both sides: women complain men aren’t masculine enough and guys complain women are too “picky”.
Becoming game-savvy has made me very self-aware of both my strengths and where I need to improve. I now can pick out the dynamic of an interaction from across a room and process it with what I reckon is 95% accuracy.
I’m now banging a girl who when I initially met her was claiming she was religious and was saving sex for a serious relationship, didn’t give blow-jobs because they were “dirty”. Now she’s cooking for me, wearing lingiere or sexy stuff every time we go out, up for banging in every which way—in other words she wants to be lead.
My now ex gf who I’ve written extensively about here and who I had terrible one-it is for but who I finally spotted as a liar, manipulator and cheat and called her out on more than a month ago is now coming out again to my weekly social circle parties. She very transparently openly flirts with other guys doing the very things she used to complain to me I did. Without the insights of game and the feedback from guys like YaReally and other I would have been completely confused and lost about what exactly was going on.
Articles like this only serve to further chip away at male self-confidence and discourage pursuit of male self-awareness.
I posted this earlier but think it’s worth a post itself. It’s an interesting companion piece to the Salon article.
For me becoming game-savvy in Asia presents an added dimension. There is also this underlying theme or myth that Asian women are submissive or perhaps they don’t respond to game or that they are averse to sex or being sexy—all of which is nonsense and usually comes from guys who don’t understand game. Asian women are no different than any other women. They respond to game the same way all women do. There are a few things that I think may be unique.
One thing I do think works better on Asian women which needs to be calibrated is calling them out on their lies and bullshit. This is not something that is usually advocated in game because it is deemed beta. But calibration is key.
I’ve noticed than when I don’t call women out on their lies or bullshit they tend to think of my silence as acceptance. When I call them out on whatever it was they did—they sulk and push-back but longer term respect it.
The last line about “man-wives” needing to grow a pair supports my premise. Again blowing up from a position of alpha and not being afraid to lose the girl is vital. Blowing up and begging for forgiveness—beta.
http://travel.cnn.com/singapore/life/opinion-why-singapore-men-suck-323414?page=1
Sheesh, is that a typical female view in Singapore? She’s not asking for more of a certain type of men, she is rejecting all the available men (1) CBD alpha males, (2) male “house-drones” that don’t make her tingle, and (3) traditional chinese men.
I predict she’ll end up with (4) cats.
@Family Man this was written by a Singaporean but it also applies in Hong Kong, mainland China, Taiwan. Men are betacized, they carry stuff for girls, etc etc.
But what is interesting is the last line. The girl wants guys to “man up” but at the same time there is a smug satisfaction that they don’t. This in some way rationalizes her own insecurities about getting involved in a relationship.
The idea that she’s better than all that means she never has to get involved and she can then justify it by saying “All men here are wimps”.
If you agree with the premise you’re submitting to her frame.
I see girls here all the time with this same attitude creating a male harem of eunich orbiters: guys who will rush out to have lunch or dinner or be their dance partners or text partners.
In my case I have often intense sexual relationships with these girls and we end up breaking up because their shit-testing and manipulation usually pushes things over the line: they will opening flirt with guys in front of me. I will get angry. They will apologize and eventually I will leave. Then they will be extremely sorry but it’s too late.
One girl I went out with years ago did this. I later told her I broke up with her because she had taken a guy’s number. She told me “I only did this to make you jealous because you weren’t giving me enough attention.”
After we broke up we banged once then for years she would call me up at regular intervals crying over losing me or send me long love letters about how she mistreated me and every year I get a birthday present and Christmas present—even if I was seeing someone else.
Though that Ong woman seems to have arrived from, say, the National States of America.
“… but after a lifetime living overseas, a girl can get pretty accustomed to some good chat. This elusive creature is almost non-existent in Singapore, save for a specific demographic of guys who know how to make a conversation tick.
… the debate-happy side of me got slightly carried away in a conversation about music, and a guy actually said: “Um … are you just like this? All the time?”
Uh, yes. It’s called talking, and besides being a very telling extension of your personality, the rest of the civilized world seems to think it’s a great way of getting to know someone.”
Shall we guess that … talking … meant “witty banter”, perhaps with a side of screaming and eye-rolling?
Well, Alexis, actually I think he did get to know you, and to a satisfactory degree.
She cheerfully admits that she “got slightly carried away” but then still proceeds to bitch about being called out on her behavior. Then the guy negs her about it (“Are you always like this?”), and she’s *still*qualifying in response to his neg as her article goes to print.
Outstanding.
@driveallnight
Yes it shows how utterly lacking in self-awareness women are.
I think women are actually “naturals” at gaming guys but they have no clue what they’re doing or why certain game tactics prompt certain reactions in them.
Her hamster is spinning at the “Are you always like this?” neg. But she’s otherwise quick to dismss “man-wives”.
The article validates most of what we talk about here and shows there is no “American” game, there’s just game.
It has occurred to me that better parts of the Dark Enlightenment, for example, the Elders of CH, are nowadays marching un-opposed carrying axes straight at the naked and exposed roots of the un-natural growth called feminism.
I say un-opposed because the would be defenders of the roots do not and probably cannot understand the DE.
Even in day-light, even after repeated teachings even after crying tears of agony.
All that bluster,
And yet you know the one true thing that screwy broad wants is enough SMV to get gamed & banged-out by Evil Stifler.
“Women should avoid trying to be funny altogether and stick to maximizing the return on their authentically valuable assets. That would be your tits, ass, face and pussy, in case you were wondering.”
Actually non-feminist women who aren’t afraid to poke fun at themselves can be funny.
[…] Salon Discovers Chateau Heartiste, Angry Menstruation Flows On Cue | Chateau Heartiste […]
“Treating every exchange with women like a manipulative math problem is ¾ stupid, ⅝ sad, and 100 percent guaranteed to make you into an ex variable.”
You’re different, baby. I wouldn’t do that to you.
Hell, she’s still trying to add up 3/4 and 5/8 and convert it to a percentage.
It’s 3+4+5+8+// = 30 percent, duh.
“Brief Bio: Anna writes a weekly sex advice column for the Chicago Tribune’s RedEye, despite having sex about four times a year. ”
She’s a youngish non-shamu short-hair bisexual who has sex four times a year. Her latest work was apparently discussing how to label lesbians, such a worthy political project by the way. That makes me think she’s actually sexually undeveloped, possibly preorgasmic.
It’s a fair warning to the reader that nothing she says should be taken serious.
Women can be incels too…
Doesn’t look old enough to be incel though.
I don’t think its age related.
Why is she telling her readers personal details about her sex life in this gratuitous way? Has she no pride in herself?
Is it me or was the non-C.H. advice retarded?
It was. Reminds me never to buy Mens Health.
Seeing this article in the Australian mainstream media surprised me a little.
http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/no-sex-please-were-equals-20140217-32umo.html
Especially the Fairfax media….
Yeah, Lori Gottlieb is off the reservation as far as Australian feminists are concerned. If you recall, she was the one that told women to look for Mr Pretty Good instead of Mr Perfect. Her and Bettina Arndt usually get a few token pieces a year in The Age or the Herald Sun only to be howled down for pointing out the obvious based on verifiable facts, data and statistics AND logic.
I agree with and do probably 90% of what is written here in Chateau.
Why?
Because it WORKS, and I fuck more women because of this behavior!
It’s just that simple!
Congrats to you! It’s all good. It is very unusual for them, I suspect, to read anything outside the echo chamber. They know you write the real thing, but they cannot consciously admit it to themselves.
eh eh lol
Well done CH
The more feminist nonsense I read, the closer I am to moving to South America. I’m sure there are feminists down there too, but I’m burning out quickly on this tired, vapid culture in the Estados Unidos. I’ve been to SA a few times and people (women) seem less caught up in all this. Also, their mouths are not nearly as filthy. Even (especially?) when writing an online diatribe, an American feminist cannot help but dispense with a hail of f-bombs. I guess I’ve developed a taste for finer things.
Excellent article on the situation in Switzerland:
http://whiterabbitradio.net/eu-hates-democracy-for-white-countries#comment-5233
..
SHE REJECTS THE CH SEX TIPS AND YET SHE LITERALLY TURNED HER LESBIAN FIANCE STRAIGHT. THAT’S SOME NUCLEAR HAMSTERIN’.
“I proposed to my last girlfriend in Lesvos, Greece, at sunset, overlooking the craggy shores of Skala Eresou. I carried the ring 8,000 miles. I wasn’t eloquent, but she cried and I cried and as we walked back to our rented house, we played a game where we guessed the number of stray cats we’d see along the way. We said the loser had to kiss the winner a million times.
Shortly after that, we moved to San Francisco. Shortly after that, I was on a different shore and she was on a boat drifting farther away from me each day. Shortly after that, we stopped having sex. Words were somewhere in the absence growing between us but I couldn’t find them. My only weapon was repetition. I made us dinner. We watched “Glee.” We went to yoga. Shortly after that, she told me she wanted to date men, that our relationship was over.”
http://www.salon.com/2012/03/01/san_francisco_turned_me_straight/
Seems like she loves the phrase “shortly after that”.
I’ve always thought repetition was a pretty weak tool to use in writing.
While it’s used to add effect, it almost always falls flat.
Remember that spiel Judge Napolitano gave on FOX that got him the boot? That’s what comes to mind. Good food for thought on his part, but the repetition killed it for me and made the whole thing feel old pretty quickly.
As they say, there is no such thing as bad advertising. You probably got a million new beta boys following now. Finally this is starting to gain momentum.
lawyercunt barbie- the nail in the coffin?
http://elitedaily.com/women/barbie-is-now-an-entrepreneur-equipped-with-a-smartphone-and-tablet-video/
That’s kinda why I’m glad I wasn’t on the internet in my teens. Say something stupid in real life, people can forget it (or you can pretend you never said it and there is no proof). But internet will document your mistakes forever.
lol at this cunt trying to attack the truth.
Here’s hoping she meets a pack of “Obama’s sons” late one night in a back alley and they treat to a wonderful trip down diversity lane. Trayvon’s brothers are always so … civilized.
No doubt she’ll blame that nonconsensual train-running gangbang on the white man. Maybe even George Zimmerman. Heck, probably even me. ha.
Rape!
She looks like Thom Yorke.
That last paragraph reminds me of that Pinhead quote from Hell Raiser:
“I am going to enjoy tormenting you, and I will enjoy making you enjoy it.”
Who knows, with enough tormenting/trolling, something like this may eventuate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Dawson
http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity/charlotte-dawson-found-dead-20140222-338j6.html
Seriously, why do you use the word ‘shiv’ so obnoxiously much?
You’re like a feminist with their patented jargon, ie overdoing it.
We get it, your wisdom is like a SHIV to the feminist ego, let it go!
[CH: Branding. (double entendre intended)]
Awww…. does “shivving” shiv you?
Very much so. CH posts need an overwrought-jargon trigger waring now!
Get it, cause ‘trigger warning’ is itself an example of… ah, never mind.
Repetition of a point is a key to winning a war on minds, hence why feminists chant their heter-normative and absurd terms like mantras.
If you’re an evangelical, frothing-at-the-mouth demagogue like feminist are, it might be.
But I thought CH was a purveyor of rational truth instead of a deluded ideologue? Or is that the use-their-own-tactics-against-them-bullshit?
Or it could be because you just delete any contrary comments here, haha.
So the smear-direction shifts.
Just curious, if this guy is so busy getting laid then how does he have the time to write all of this nonsense?
[CH: Just curious, why do you look like a 12 year old boy?]
Awww, CH, you are so adorable when you use your little “tactics”! It’s a little weird, but I’m willing to look past it.
Anyhoo, carry on writing your articles. Everyone needs something to fill all that spare time, right?
Obvious shaming tactic is obvious. Can’t you be a little more subtle? Hot girls are usually better at this. Maybe your picture makes you look better than you are.
Anyhoo everyone needs something filled now and then don’t they?
Obvious shaming tactic is meant to be obvious. Being subtle defeats the purpose of being obvious.
Listen, dudes, maybe I have just encountered overly obvious, extraordinarily disingenuous, obnoxious asshole “alpha males”, but all of the men that I have been most attracted to in life have had enormous self-confidence, obvious intelligence, and respect for both themselves and those around them. They talked to me and everyone else like human beings, not like robots that respond to saying just the right thing. Tactics like “negging” come off as suspicious, and girls who have options don’t go for anyone who comes off as slightly suspicious.
The problem with both this and the “beta dudes” you guys are trying to reform is that both groups aren’t being human. It’s two different kinds of woman worship: one where you obsess over how to manipulate her into doing what you want and one where you assume that sex is a reward for good behavior and come off as creepy and weird. True “alpha males” I’ve known would laugh at the thought that they need 16 rules for wooing a girl. They can do it just by being themselves. And man is that hott.
Anyway, that’s my free advice. Hope everyone here gets what they are after.
You wrote all that say that you like guys that already possess high value traits and don’t like guys that try to learn to be that way.
Well no shit. LOL.
It’s like men saying that would like a hot girl that’s never ever been fat. No duh.
Let’s reverse your whole little rant here:
“Listen, chicks, maybe I have just encountered girls trying to make themselves look thinner and try to hard to pretend they are hotter than they are “hot chicks”, but all of the women that I have been most attracted to in life have had nice thin bodies, a good rack, and a good pert ass no pancake butt . They had fit bodies and didn’t have to obsess about not eating junk food and making a difficult effort to go to the gym because they had a very healthy lifestyle that they liked to do.Tactics like push up bras, covering acne with makeup and wearing slimming clothes come off as suspicious, and men who have options don’t go for anyone who comes off as slightly suspicious.
”
I left out the last paragraph though because unlike girls we always welcome unattractive fat women losing weight and entering the promise land. The more the merrier. Whereas women throw up at the thought of beta males becoming high value because then they might accidently fuck one of them.
Not at all. I fully support men gaining confidence, self-respect, and a strong identity. They don’t need manipulative tactics when they gain all of these things. I throw up at the obvious digs into another human being’s worth and identity.
I’ve encountered more than one PUA aficionado,
[CH: #coolstorybro]
and found them all laughable.
[You got dumped. It’s ok, heartache is a part of life.]
Some that I was attracted to before they opened their mouth. Le sigh.
[Lesson: Male personality trumps male looks.]
“Not at all. I fully support men gaining confidence, self-respect, and a strong identity. They don’t need manipulative tactics when they gain all of these things. I throw up at the obvious digs into another human being’s worth and identity. ”
No you don’t. You fully support men gaining, self respect and a strong identity on YOUR OWN TERMS. The same terms that have fucked these same men to begin with. It’s a catch 22.
To become the men that are attractive they have to do and think things that you find offensive. You just want to eat the sausage, you don’t want to see how it’s made.
It’s the same with guys saying that they don’t like a girl with makeup. They like natural beauty and you know it’s bullshit because what they are saying is they want a girl that looks like she wears makeup without wearing makeup. It’s just dumb.
“I’ve encountered more than one PUA aficionado, and found them all laughable. Some that I was attracted to before they opened their mouth. Le sigh. ”
Everyone starts somewhere. It’s like saying I’ve encountered more than one newbie at the gym and he wasn’t jacked so lifting weights doesn’t work.
It’s ok, CH, sometimes definitions are hard. Laughing is something people do when something is funny. Getting dumped isn’t funny.
And I know it’s hard. I’m sorry you guys have to go through all of this trouble just to *try* to keep it from happening to you….
[CH: Mental mediocrities like yourself should avoid trying to be funny and just focus on getting male attention the old-fashioned way: you know, lotsa cleavage, short skirts and knowing when the time is right to shut up and look cute.]
@FuriousFerret I do *not* want it on my terms. There is an underlying element of truth here that gets lost in all the “game-playing”. Having a strong sense of self is very attractive. That means not a self that I tell you to have. Not a self that I always approve of. Your own identity.
However, when you resort to manipulation then you are still missing that sense of personal autonomy. You are altering the way you would naturally interact as a human sans all of your insecurities and replacing it with a bunch of rules that may very well have temporary success, but result in long term harm to both you and your partner. You are saying that seducing a woman is more important than being genuine.
Learn to be a genuine human.
[CH: “Just be yourself.”]
Don’t pander like a “beta” and don’t manipulate like an “alpha”.
[But if you have to choose, choose alpha manipulation. Women are more likely to spread their legs for the latter.]
That’s all I’m saying.
[We know.]
Man, I’m getting so much comment action from CH.
[CH: …said the cat toy to the cat.]
It’s like a dream come true!
[I bet.]
Wow, I’ve never wanted anything more.
[You’re free to leave this blog at any time.]
And just to think: he think’s I’m mediocre.
[That’s where the evidence is pointing.]
Like, that’s one step up from ditzy.
[So I’m saying you have a chance.]
Hope I don’t get any negative points for that. I would go home and cry.
[We’ll see if you redeem yourself.]
I’m having too much fun to leave now, CH.
[CH: Translation: She got the fever for the flavor of a tingle.]
You know, if all the other men in the world died and I had to pick between you five I would choose Furious Ferret.
[My heart will go on.]
Why? He is the only one who has engaged in legitimate conversation thus far instead of sideways insults.
[Pity party or sexual manipulation, which one will she choose? Ah, why not both!]
@bealady101
You have a very mannish jawline, you’re ugly and you probably smell bad. You should just thank God that blonde inflation exists.
@FuriousFerret Whew! Thank God I have at least something to attract you. I wouldn’t know how to go on otherwise….
[CH: You’re really worried that men won’t find you attractive. Understandable. It’s your female nature.]
“Whew! Thank God I have at least something to attract you. I wouldn’t know how to go on otherwise….”
Wrong again. Blonde inflation only works on non fair featured/skinned guys that have a scarcity mentality about it.
Nordics can see the actual plain jane you that exists behind the blue/blonde combo that you fool others with.
Haha @CH and @FuriousFerret, the man that matters finds me irresistible and that is good enough for me. To each his own, carry on.
I don’t much care for geometric, purple men either, to put it bluntly….
Just one last thing, I looked at your pics, and you are going to be quite the fattie in about five years. You know that is true too. Don’t even dare to pretend you aren’t headed for fattie status in the near future.
When that happens, goodbye value to society.
Just to show I’m a good guy I’ll help you out a little bit:
http://www.marksdailyapple.com
LOL! You boys make me giggle.
wall of text, no doubt hamster spinning.
TLDR.
wish u all the best.
No doubt, that’s what one would come to expect on the internet.
Toodles!
And PS- Your tactics aren’t so subtle either.
That’s what they all say.
Hello “Be A Lady 101″,
Brief note: behaving in a ladylike manner does not include engaging in mean-spirited snarkiness with strangers. Perhaps you should change the name of your website to “Bitter Broads”.
Thank you for the advice. While I sometimes agree with you that peacemaking is the best option, on occasion I like to fight fire with fire. As in: mean-spirited snarkiness gets returned with snarkiness. A fair point gets a fair point in return.
[CH: For the record, since it is in the nature of cunty drive-bys like yourself to muddy the origins of internet battles in an appeal to martyrdom, you came to this board and spouted shit from the get-go. Had you arrived with the proper deference and humility to learn new ideas, you would have been treated better. But you didn’t, so you aren’t.]
Dear CH,
Well, to be fair, these aren’t quite new ideas to me.
[CH: So you have a lot of experience dating men with game.]
I have read about them, had them fully explained, and witnessed them in action.
[“Action”. heh]
I can’t hate on someone for trying to get laid and free themselves from the obnoxious constraints society puts on them.
[Society’s got nothing to do with it. Immutable biological sex differences shape male and female romantic behavior.]
I can hate on someone for using belittling and manipulative tactics.
[False premise. You lied when you said you had game tactics fully explained to you. Unless you meant you had them fully explained to you by a mewling manboob or a shrike feminist.]
And I’m no martyr.
[You just play on the internet.]
I would sincerely regret it if I portrayed that message.
[Pray for your salvation.]
Besides, you are out preaching the opposite of deference.
[Context matters. But you know that.]
Don’t expect it from me just because you signed up for a WordPress account.
[Correction: I don’t “expect” deference from anyone, but I do expect them to understand that there are consequences to barging in here like an ill-informed dolt and mouthing off. If this bothers you, leave.]
Not bothered. Making the sign of the cross as we speak!
The dominant theme of this Chateau has something in common with where you appear to be going with your own website, that being self improvement. You’ve come in by one post which is highly critical of Feminism and a blogger with obvious emotional and sexual issues. To better understand the site and those who choose to read it, you would do better to begin from the position that gets reinforced constantly throughout the manosphere: game begins from within and requires that the individual man know his weaknesses, build his strengths, and recognize the world for how it really is, not how he wants it to be. If you read through you’ll find a wealth of advice for men in relationships, who want to keep their women happy with them. Because they love their women. Game gets a bad rap because of the suggestion that women can be tricked into sex; fair enough. It works anyway, regardless of opinion. But it is not limited to talking 25 year old girls out of their panties. It’s also magnificent in maintaining healthy happy relationships between couples who love each other. Why? Because it teaches men to behave like Men. This is the beef we have with Feminism. Men and women are not the same, and shaming men for not behaving like women is ultimately destructive. Who else is telling men how to behave like Men? The blogger linked above describes fucking men in the ass with a strapon in one of her published articles. Do you think she knows anything at all about how men should behave? She certainly doesn’t know anything about how a lady should behave.
There are guys here only interested in getting laid. There are others of us who just want to understand women. Here’s the thing: the advice here works. The Lefty stuff produces uniform failure. If a man wants to be a Man and have a successful relationship with a Woman, he would do well to take the advice offered here and elsewhere around manosphere.
Fair points, greg. Somewhere in this mess of comments I said that I agree with the underlying premise that having a strong personal identity is not only attractive, but beneficial for the individual. I just disagree with some of the methods.
It’s very possible that I have only met bad, annoying, and overly obvious gamers before and interpreted what I have read here accordingly. However, reading all of the comments on these posts has rather confirmed my opinion that PUA boys are trying to get laid by playing on the insecurities of unsuspecting women. Additionally, when they criticize females they then claim we lack the self-awareness to realize it. Rather circular…..
My experience is that being authentic attracts those who value you for your individual nuances, which leads to greater happiness for everyone. Am I wrong in my impression that “game” is inauthentic?
@bealady
Most of the men on this site, learning game etc, are here simply because they don’t get laid regularly. They suck with women. Their way of socializing with the opposite sex needs improvement. So you are upset with the way some of the commenters are interacting with you, but are at the same time mocking precepts that were they able to master, would likely lead to interactions you would prefer. There are a few guys on this site who legitimately understand social dynamics as they relate to the mating game and are able to pull women, but most are learning.
@bealady: “My experience is that being authentic attracts those who value you for your individual nuances, which leads to greater happiness for everyone. Am I wrong in my impression that “game” is inauthentic?”
Game is a tool for improving attraction from the opposite sex. Bad game looks like game; good game is effortless confidence and charisma. Who cares if the guy was born with it or learned it?
You’re using authenticity as a code word for confidence/assurance, which is really what you value. A stammering nerdy guy is authentic, but are you attracted to him? No indeed, you’re not.
One can be confident and not authentic. I do not find that attractive either.
A stammering nerdy guy is not authentic. He allows his fear to alter him.
There’s a period of time in which a man un-learning what he has been taught and learning Game is clumsy. Oafish. He’s not certain of what he’s doing, and the results are obvious. Sometimes embarrassing. If you’re new to this, you’ll see a number of references to red pill/blue pill. The understanding is black and white, but changing how you think is complex and difficult.
So we all try something that produces results: fake it till you make it. To broaden the concept, these men will set an abstract goal with concrete measurements, and aim for that goal. And fail. And fail again. And fail again. And with each failure, they learn something about themselves and how people interact with each other.
It’s something maybe you don’t grasp, but men have been taught to keep quiet and be meek. Women have GRRL POWER. Men have ADHD. To recognize this and change how we think, away from Leftist hatred of individuality and toward the simple manly virtues of boldness, assertiveness, and confidence, DOES require a period of time in which a man needs to experiment and try. He fails. But he doesn’t quit; he learns, and he grows.