Think about the ecumenical change in society that, intuitively, must be happening with the widespread use of various hindbrain altering drugs, like the Pill and antidepressants. This is a change in biochemistry unparalleled in human evolutionary history. It’d be a miracle of serendipity if there weren’t blowback.
A reader surmises,
Great site. Good advice. But …
There is something to be said for all the anti-depressants/mood stabilizers/whatevers that women are taking these days. And I mean, a LOT of women on are on these psych drugs. You’re asking me so what, right? Well …
A lot of a man’s behavior toward women rests on the presumption (truth) that women are insecure and may get depressed at times, and when they do, they choose a man that has been solid for them. They either choose one, confide in the one they “love” or return to one. BUT, with these drugs, I think a lot of their negative feelings are prevented, making them less vulnerable.
It’s something I’ve noticed among professional women. Sure, maybe my game isn’t what it was, but I think it’s worth addressing. Women’s drugs are changing the game a little bit.
An interesting hypothesis we have here, and one that may go a ways to explaining why there is a growing impression among American men that their women are becoming manlier, sluttier, present-time oriented, and all-around less provocatively charming.
Here’s a lovefact sure to torque a feminist’s fat hamster into a tailspin:
Maxim #27: Beyond beauty, a woman’s attractiveness to men is partly a function of her feminine vulnerability, or her ability to mimic feminine vulnerability.
Corollary to Maxim #27: Men are turned off by overconfident, assertive, proudly self-sufficient women.
Yep, despite the delusional claptrap that feminists want the world to believe, men don’t swoon for women who act like men. Non-manboobed men with hanging testicles don’t, at any rate. Invulnerability is not sexy on women.
Men, at least K-selected men from the frigid Northlands where the cold winds blow and nothing grows for six months, are hard-wired with a protection instinct. We want to guard the carriers of our kingly posterity.
Evolution, therefore, has ensured that men respond viscerally to beautiful, weak women needing protection. A woman in need rallies a man’s ready seed.
Enter antidepressants. Suddenly women all over the sub-veneer tribal landscape are feeling invincible, unstoppable, and perfectly capable on their own. “No means no, creeper!” The manly protective (beta) instinct which warms the hearts of biochemically natural women leaves SSRI drugged-up simulacra of women feeling indifferent, even antagonistic, to the same signals of stoically masculine benefaction.
Multiply this effect a hundredfold in the homeland of the SWPL: The big blue whitening cities of the coasts, where every vibrantly atomized lawyercunt and her bovine cockblock are hopped up on happy happy happy pills. No joke, I’d bet 80% of Obama Country college-grad white chicks are dazed and confused with the help of Big Father Pharma. That percentage jumps to 99% when you expand the age range to include spinsters with two or more cats aka alpha male substitutes.
All successful game requires, in lesser or greater dose, the deployment, consciously or otherwise, of psychological tactics which raise the man’s relative status, lower the woman’s relative status, or both. This is a fact of the nature of the sexes, and it exists because the lifeblood of lust is fed to men and women by different veins. What excites a woman — the challenging company of a higher value, dominant man — is different than what excites a man — the company of a coy, vulnerable, pretty woman. You can rail to the ends of the earth about this fallen state of humanity, but you will never change it, not as long as there are two sexes evolved with differing reproductive goals.
It makes sense, then, that drugs which create a disturbance in the sexual polarity force would also have a downstream effect on courtship, both the traditional and the modern game styles of mate acquisition. A less vulnerable-feeling woman is a woman less receptive to beta provider game, and — this is getting deep into CH theory of modern dating dynamics territory — more receptive to sexy alpha bounder game.
An artificially happy and confident woman is, in short, a no-game-having beta male’s worst nightmare.
(A few of you wags might say that SSRIs are helping turn the US from a Euro mating market to an African mating market, where sky high self-esteem absent any supporting evidence is the norm.)
As a visionary acolyte of Le Chateau, you want to know how to make this new social reality work for you. (Some of you want to change it back to where it was before it turned wicked, but that is a concern for wise old men with rerouted energies.) A good start is dread game, which is the seducer’s answer to invulnerable women.
Some other proto-men, like the scalzied followers of male feminists, take the opposite tack, and submit themselves completely to the whim of Tsarina Bombas, in hopes, apparently, that their utter prostration would excite in women the pity fuck compulsion before it triggers their active repulsion reflex.
A specific skill of modern seduction, as channeled through game, will therefore need to be (sadly from a certain perspective) the ability to evoke, in pinprick psychological jabs, sadness, fear, worry and self-doubt in the Happy Harlots of Late Hour America. If you lack this skill, you’ll find more cynical men stealing your lamb meat off your white linened table.
Or, you could just wait out the coming collapse in your Galtian gulch, and watch the feckless loverboys starve in the streets live-streamed, as the newly vulnerable women rediscover the value of your warm hearth. But by that time, you’ll have stuccoed the entirety of your masturbatorium.
The antidepressant ruination of American women is a theory worth investigating, particularly in light of observational evidence in favor. Perhaps enterprising readers will unearth studies which connect the dots. Or perhaps they’ll just say “what the fuck”, and give the Supergirls a double dose of ego-smashing sexytime.
Feminine women inspire love/attraction.
Masculine women don’t. At most they try to coerce it.
A Mother’s Solution to Miley Cyrus Twerking on Robin Thicke? Violence Against Men!
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/27/dear-daughter-let-miley-cyrus-be-a-lesson-to-you-the-amazing-open-letter-from-mom-set-to-go-viral/
Regarding Miley Cyrus Twerking on Robin Thicke at MTV’s VMAs, The Blaze reports that a mother writes to her daughter:
“Yes, this is what happens when you constantly hear everything you do is awesome. This is what happens when people fawn over your every Tweet and Instagram photo. This is what happens when no responsible adult has ever said the word “no,” made you change your clothes before leaving the house, or never spanked your butt for deliberate defiance.
If you ever even consider doing something like that, I promise you that I will run up and twerk so you will see how ridiculous twerking looks. I will duct tape your mouth shut so your tongue doesn’t hangout like an overheated hound dog. I will smack any male whom you decide to smash against his pelvis.”
– http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/27/dear-daughter-let-miley-cyrus-be-a-lesson-to-you-the-amazing-open-letter-from-mom-set-to-go-viral/
lzozozozozozozozozoozozozo
A Mother’s Solution to Miley Cyrus Twerking on Robin Thicke? Violence Against Men!
“Maxim #27: Beyond beauty, a woman’s attractiveness to men is partly a function of her feminine vulnerability, or her ability to mimic feminine vulnerability.”
It’s also a function of her ability to be, you know, be a woman.
I can’t tell you how many men would fall hopelessly in love and be willing to die for a girl that is actually nice to them, smiles a lot, kisss them at the door, wants to make them a sandwich, and have some kids without too much fuss.
srs truff hurr.
No joke, I’d bet 80% of Obama Country college-grad white chicks are dazed and confused with the help of Big Father Pharma. That percentage jumps to 99% when you expand the age range to include spinsters with two or more cats aka alpha male substitutes.
The fraction is fairly high, but nowhere near 80%. Think about what that would mean.
Antidepressants may not actually do much at all:
Why Antidepressants Are No Better Than Placebos
What if the placebo effect is enough to alter behavior? Might not matter one way or the other if antidepressants are “effective”.
I am a psychiatrist who recently prescribed the main girl im fucking [who is a 26 yo former full time model] wellbutrin bc she was feeling depressed regarding the fact that id never marry her….but she feels like she cant leave the relationship. So in essence I have control of this bitches mind psychologically AND biologically. Its tight.
Isn’t that a violation of your ethics?
Your sloppy writing belies your peacocking claim.
I found the GHOAT, the Greatest Hamster of All Time, on match.com!!! She’s 52 years old and looks as good as a 52 year old can look, but, come on, she’s 52. I’d post the link to her profile but it seems CH does not go so far as to post match profiles to embarrass people. Just the thought of fucking a woman who’s more than half a century old literally grosses me out. And she lists her age range as men 32 to 44, and she lectures in her profile to be sure to pay attention to her age range. lzozlozlzozlzozzozz.
Even worse, some of her pics are of herself with her two 22 and 23 year old daughters with caption “me with my younger sisters lol” and they are *smoking* by comparison. I might message her and ask if she will set me up with her daughter. It is obvious this woman was a 9 back in the 1980s (pretending she had modern hair style), and her daughters show what she looked like, but good lord….
Dear 52 year old women, no matter how thin you have managed to stay, your target age range in men is now 65 to 90.
Good article. A few years ago, my friend was going to divorce her husband, and she was understandably suffering from intense anxiety over it. Her female lawyer recommended she go on mood stabilizers to get through the divorce.
I know a another woman, who has been on high doses of mood stabilizers for years. She can have literally go for months without talking you, without seeming to be bothered by it. When she does talk to me, I find it hard to bond with her, as if we aren’t connecting on an emotional level. I think these drugs really do change a person’s personality.
I understand some people really do need them to get through the day, but I don’t think they shouldn’t be considered a cure all for the ups and downs of life.
I pulled this type of ego pin pricking on a “professional woman” high off her corporate sales acquisitions.
My immediate go to:
-jab at her careerism
-predict she doesn’t want kids until it’s near closing time (I was right)
-joke about her soon husband to be
-how sorry I feel for him
This was all out loud, straight to her face. She loved it.
The next thing I’m hearing are very personal details you only hear after extensive comfort game. All in 5-8mins tops. WTF?!
Re. antidepressants:
Bring back low self-esteem and smoking.
Re. subhumans killing WWII vets:
Equality failed.
Why take an either/or approach? Prepare for the coming collapse & the resulting return to sexual dimorphism … but in the interim, present an Asshole Cad™ front.
Win/win.
Men who fail to understand women are ruining women. It’s hard to explain the concept of “women want to be led,” in concrete terms. But honestly, everything you feel, she will feel. The catch is that women are good at picking up on how you actually feel, i.e. spotting incongruities. A lot of the behavior seems as simple as ‘o he seems happy and fun and outgoing, we’re having a happy and fun and outgoing interaction! o he seems nervous and unsure of himself and awkward, we’re having a weird and awkward interaction!’
You control your emotions, you control those around you.
Seeing as how I am just starting to internalize this concept, I imagine that most normal d00ds are unaware of this concept…accounting for some of the weird gender relations we see today.
Adding somewhat to this article (while staying away from the chemical component), femininity is extremely important. Maybe less important than looks, but way, way, way significant. I’m convinced that a lot of women are incapable of loving or appreciating a man in the way a man wants to be loved and appreciated. And some seem to do so effortlessly.
Interesting indeed. I don’t know if I’ve experienced much in the way of ego-stoking, confidence boosting, invulnerability, etc. within the dosed females I have encountered; they still come across quite vulnerable and frail – but in the wrong ways. Real or even well played vulnerability wrapped in femininity comes from a well-adjusted self. The problem with the modern woman is that the self is so fractured that the feminine vulnerability that men respond to is far too schizo; it is grounded in the very thing that is at the root of the need for medication: the incongruence, the inability to reconcile the “truth” they have absorbed (feminism) with what their biological drive and subsequent biological responses of men they encounter tell them.
The dissonance runs deep. Be it generalized anxiety disorder, depression, or any host of manifestations, under this yoke their ability to cope with everyday life let alone gender relations is flawed/damaged. “Happiness” or “contentment” has been on a subtle, yet significant (statistically) decline in the female population for quite some time now. We can wonder about these tipping points down the line – if our society can wake itself from this slumber in time, but either way we’ve already got a generation of women who are baked into this mental state and are for the most part reliant on pharma to get them through the day.
What I see as the side-effect of the significant and growing population of women on pharama is not in their false bravado, confidence, ball-busting strength, or other performance enhancing elements, but rather in their indifference and the downward spiral of the constant focus on the “self”, their happiness, their satisfaction, their stimulation.
All the things that keep them in their solipsistic dream-state while the real world and the men who might engage with them tire of trying to pull them into the light. Indifference works on women, not the other way around. Most of these drugs seek to smooth out the ups and downs, to mitigate swings, create a base state of being, narrowing the bandwidth in which the brain has to process stimuli. These things work toward numbing, not empowering. The costs to quiet the noise from that dissonance are many. And the fact that the end goal is approximating some kind of “happiness” just further exasperates the overarching problems with women and their ability to make rational decisions and accept the results, e.g. “I’m not haaaaaapppppy” is a failure of this prime directive and thus releases the hamster to run wild. Drugs aren’t changing this, they are part of the problem.
While this is all no doubt true, we also must remember this: younger women these days are, in general, really, really screwed up due to many issues (absent fathers being the big one). Just take a look at Tumblr or Whisper to see how many girls are emotional train wrecks and seek endless attention for it.
So, I have faith that a dose of Zoloft isn’t going to do much other than (possibly) make these young, hot girls moderately functional. Bad for society, good for getting some.
There’s that anti-depressant commercial which says your anti-depressant medication may not be enough, so you should take their little helpers as well. Shows a nice lady getting perked up on her new pills and becoming happy and functional with her co-workers at Encorpera.
I am no fan of TV and only have it because ForeignBride likes to watch to improve her English. The barrage of stupid is hard to believe. The new Allstate commercial showing the handsome black Allstate rep showing up reassuringly in white people’s bedrooms at 3am takes the cake. It’s a step up from him lurking at the end of the driveway when your daughter drives off. I use SimplyNoise to drown out the TV while I work but get a glimpse every day despite my efforts.
The “teens” who did this should indeed be drawn and quartered CH.
They have an average IQ of about 80 and are incapable of functioning in our society. Nine generations of imbeciles is enough.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2402896/Daughter-WWII-veteran-88-beaten-death-teen-robbers-describes-attack.html
SSRI’s also significantly blunt libido and sexual pleasure. Many people find it impossible to orgasm on these drugs.
If SSRIs make it harder for women to orgasm, it may explain why they cleave more to alpha badboys. They need a stronger drug to get the same effect they used to get with less dominant, less sexy men.
With the feminization of work it is interesting that a lot of career gals are higher than a kite on anti-depressants, yet working for corporations that crow about their zero-tolerance policy on “drug abuse”. A lot of men are on them as well. I worked with a gal who’s boyfriend liked to brew beer, but was on anti-depressants so couldn’t drink it. So she gave me the beer. Quite good actually.