Feed on
Posts
Comments

Yet again I bore horrible witness to one of those vegetable lasagnas wearing a “This is what a feminist looks like” t-shirt. This specimen was particularly nauseating, owing to the noodled form he assumed slumped in a seated position with legs crossed, bent over at the waist as if straining to empty his bowels. No, if it were only so; had he pipetted a rabbit pellet into his skinny jeans that would have been more masculine than the real reason for his neutered posture: leaning in to hang on every word a tatted, obese woman was orating regarding the glory of Aaron Sorkin’s new libcrack show, “The Soapboxroom”.

Christ, what a spectacle.

This peculiar, penis-smooshing posture — one I see an increasing number of “males” performing uncoerced — is truly the eunuch’s mark of self-denial. It is the body language of the beta male veering into the omega dreg. It is the guilt stigmata of the man who is uncomfortable with the insouciant protrusion of his genitalia, who wishes on some Freudian level he were a girl, and who has somehow convinced himself his excitable self-flagellation is the stuff of women’s fantasies.

With this in mind, I hereby propose the universal logo of the feminized Western Male:

If someone could crop this and zoom in, that would be great. Better yet, if someone could find a human version of the above pose, with one hand propped under chin, eyes watery with intense listening, even better. Nothing quite captures the essence of the de-balled 21st Century Western male better than this sitting pose, imo.

I don’t always sit, but when I do, I sit like a boss.

213 Responses to “Universal Logo Of The Feminized Male”

  1. Manly men actually sit like that outside of the West. Facial expressions are universal, but not all body language is.

      • Thor says:

        There is a dichotomy here. Jews in general are not known for their feminism.

        And many are intellectual leaders, for good and evil. Cf Ayn Rand.

        Thor

        • lzozozlzo

          yes yes ayn rand and gloria steinem were not feminisst zlzozozz

          and neither were these ladies lzzozo

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_feminists

          lozzolzozolz

          btw any rand is for pro baby killing zlzozolzo

          she is for capitalism and freedom for all
          except the innocentz
          lzzozzozozo

          • ME says:

            Rand thought that a woman always sought to look up to her man,wanted someone who exceeded her achievements.. The Fountainhead had a male character forcably rape a female character and afterwards she not only did not turn him in, she was dedicated to him for the rest of her life. This from a female author.

          • Thor says:

            Exactly.

            And in Rand’s other Magnum Opus, Atlas Shrugged, there is a description
            of the female lead’s coming to orgasm, fantastic writing – and it does NOT
            describe the mechanics, just what is going on in her head. And yes, she
            is clearly subordinate to him, by her own choice. A little earlier in the book,
            she offers to become a house maid to male lead. From memory:

            He: “cooking and cleaning [etc] is that what you want to do?”

            She: “Yes, that’s what I want to do”, with the addition (thinking)
            “more than anything on Earth”

            Thor

          • yes! i knowz!!

            feminist ayn rand was both pro rape and pro abortion!! lzozlzozlz lzozooozz

          • hey thor–I bet she was cooking da aborted fetustsh and serving it upas she came to an arogagsmsmsic orgaansmms zlozlzlz

          • Ulf Elfvin says:

            Only it wasn’t rape. Read carefully.

          • SFG says:

            Rand is the perfect example of the high-T woman who’s subby in bed.

            Whenever a gal listed Rand on her profile, I wore a necktie to the date. Got to use it about half the time.

          • Thor says:

            Rape? Yes and no. Somebody wrote that “if it was rape, it was rape by engraved invitation”.

            One of the keys, IIRC, is that she struggled, but SOUNDLESSLY.

            Thor

          • hey mom is jewish
            & my dadd is viking icelandic thorish
            so da gbfm is like jesus with thor’s hamemrr lzozzolzo

          • Dagny Taggart acts as a maid for a man she admires. Partly it is Rand showing that there is nothing wrong with an honest transaction – the ancient one of services from the woman in exchange for goods from the man. Partly, IIRC, Rand is clearly getting off on the submission of her favourite character. It is very like a romance novel, some of which involve the woman effectively acting as a traditional wife substitute for the alpha male at one stage of the book – she may later actually marry him.

            Rand was not a feminist. She wanted to be considered equal to men, although a woman. She was scathing about the early feminists. I think she felt women were getting a good deal and should stop whining.

            Rand believe in Man, with women tagging along. She considered herself an honorary man. (It has just occurred to me, fancifully I suppose, that Dagny’s surname might have been a sly pun. “Taggart” – someone tagging along?)

          • lzozozo

            Real MEN aren’t for killing murdiering the innocent unborn via abortion, like Ayn Rand was.

            real men aren’t AHTEISSTS MURDERSZ like lenin stalin anyn rand trotsy lzozoz

            moses taught tou shalt not kill
            jesusth agreed
            zeus protected da innocent and da lowly

            AYN RAND orgasmed by killing unborn fethsuses lzozzlzo

            dat is why so many fanboyz worship her

            as dey ejactualyte alongide her orgasming zlzozlzo

            ayn rand considers motherhood slavery lozozozz

          • For the record, GBFM, I am strongly anti-abortion. And I have gone public under my real name on the issue.

          • Thor says:

            And?

            Thor

          • feminists suck, but abortion is a good thing: there are just some females who Dont deserve to bear children, lest they grow as beasts whose mother is unworthy and incapable; they will add to the menace in the world because some slut got knocked up; these sluts dont deserve commitment nor do they deserve to bear children

        • GOOD or evil??????? Good? Really? You’re not one of those semen-swallowing philo-semites that infest the Net are ye,lad??

        • namae nanka says:

          “Jews in general are not known for their feminism.”

          They are not? They should be.
          There is a long list over at wikipedia of jewish feminists.
          Top off my head:

          Andrea Dworkin the great hippo, penis is vagina is rape
          Betty Friedan (nee Goldstein) mommy of second-wave
          Lenore Weitzman ‘Divorce makes men rich, women poor’ study, then Clinton law
          Susan Brownmiller (nee goldsomething?) the only 2% false rape claims
          Naomi Wolf her anorexia lies are dealt with in a pubmed paper titled:

          “A critical appraisal of the anorexia statistics in The Beauty Myth: introducing Wolf’s Overdo and Lie Factor (WOLF).”

          and now she is raging about the rape culture in the military.

          The last four are frauds, liars, and whole list will throw up even more cases of “intellectualism”. Dworkin made a rape claim that uhmm, was kinda hard to believe even for feminists.

          Glenn Sacks wrote of why he would not marry jewish women.

          http://www.henrymakow.com/why_i_didnt_marry_a_jewish_wom.html

          Rich Zubaty’s quote:
          “My ex is Jewish. My kids are Jewish. Morning minyan is the only place men can go to get away from the women and that’s only because the women are still in bed. Judaism is a Matriarchy disguised as a Patriarchy. Jewish women obey no one – not their husbands, not their God. They are in many ways the mold for the type of women American society is producing.”

          Then the little thing about matrilineality, and I am doubting that you are not trolling.

          • chi-town says:

            My Jewish professor, who was then still a relatively young man some years ago, said he thought feminism saved the planet, but that Jewish women didn’t need it. No doubt the the first comment was a spoon full of sugar to make the medicine go down.

            The Torah is patriarchal text. This Jewish text seems to be the only thing that the typical God fearin Christian soldier knows. The Kabbalistic writings are worshipful of the female.

        • enicar says:

          Wrong.

          Jewish Women, in general, are not known for being feminine.

          • johndraper says:

            It’s the feminized nerd syndrome. Intellectual men lose their social skills, which makes it impossible for them to become truly alpha (game notwithstanding). To compensate, they trade peer bonding and resources for sex and help with social situations from their wives.

            This tilts the balance of power towards the wife, which in terms leads to more stereotypically masculine behaviour from pair-bonded nerd wives.

            European Jews were just one of the first cultures to experience strong selection pressures towards intelligence. 30% of Nobel Prize winners and 50% of Fields Medals didn’t happen by accident.

            At least game is tilting the balance back towards men.

          • Thor says:

            Selection pressure is exactly the point. Since Jews were generally prohibited from farming (by not being allowed to own land) and locked out of most trades by the guilds, intellectual pursuits were some of the few avenues open. (Add to that that Christians were typically not allowed to charge interest [the same applied to Jews, but in their case the prohibition applied only to charging interest to other Jews] and you got a setup for Jewish bankers. What else were they supposed to do?)

            Additionally, the most obvious way to upward mobility for people born smart but poor (the latter being the vast majority, everywhere), was to join the clergy. And here there is a difference. The rabbi had five kids and his congregation took good care of him. The minister in Catholic countries (all of Europe to about 1500s) was not supposed to marry.

            Us Nordics took the least damage, the last in Europe to become Christian, ca 1000, and the first to go Protestant, ca 1530 or so.

          • SFG says:

            Funny Thor mentions Nordics, who are perhaps the only people in the world to actually make socialism work.

          • corvinus says:

            Thor, I don’t think it’s quite as simple as that (“Catholic = stupid because all the smart Catholics became priests and didn’t pass on their genes”). The most intellectually advanced countries in Europe in the latter part of the millennium were Germany and Italy. Italy was the cradle of the Renaissance, and it has never been exactly overflowing with Protestants.

            Protestant supremacy may be attributed to facts such as 1) Catholics were taught by their religion that amassing wealth was Bad, and living a humble life is Good, whereas Protestants didn’t; in fact, Calvinists say that if you have money, you’re blessed by God; 2) Protestants had a much more cutthroat (less moral) attitude toward getting ahead, which led to 3) heavy Protestant involvement in Freemasonry, commerce, banking, and such, as well as 4) Protestants tended to arise among the smarter, middle-class people in many countries (such as the Huguenots in France), and 5) Protestants had no problem charging money with interest. The same material advantages that Protestants enjoyed, the Jews had before them.

            To suggest that most smart Catholics joined the clergy to get ahead would suggest that most Catholics had no functioning sex drives. The monasteries offered education to many poor children who never did become priests. If you were poor and virile, you were more likely to get a career in the army. If you were smart and virile, in commerce.

            If there was any effect on men joining monasteries, I suggest that it had more of an effect in lowering beta behavior, by sucking in beta males. Historically, in Europe, the men in Catholic countries were seen by other women much as Muslim or black men are seen today.

          • Role of climate in relative economic drive of Catholics and Protestants:

            http://julianodea.blogspot.com.au/2007/10/catholic-countries-warm-and-lazy-recent.html

          • corvinus says:

            David Collard: That’s another good analysis. I agree with that too.

          • Thor says:

            Yes, sortof. I normally live in the US, but right now I am on a working vacation in Scandinavia. For better and for worse, these countries are marked by

            o Low level of corruption and cronyism (things being relative)

            o Until recently, a fairly homogenous population.

            o Immigration, although far from problem free, brings in ambitious people,
            not the ones that the tribal chiefs sold off. Cf the difference between
            the recently immigrated black population and the ones whose
            ancestors were brought in in chains two hundred years ago, in the US.

            o The taxpayer´s money is used to the benefits of a majority.
            One small example, the Stockholm Subway system, paid for
            (dearly) by generations of taxpayers (and the rides are NOT
            particularly cheap, a single ticket is about 5 bucks). The point
            is it WORKS and it is NICE. Compare to the LA subway, billions
            for a 5 mile ride, useless except to a few people that live and
            work in the right spots. Or the NYC subway that works but
            is horrible.

            None of this would entice me to pay their crazy income taxes, hence
            visits limited to three months. I am practically (but not ideologically)
            OK with the 25% VAT (sortof sales tax, on everything including
            services), I consider it a fee for using the infrastructure.

            Thor

          • Thor says:

            Socialism works in Scandinavia?

            Actually, the term as applied to Scandinavia is a misnomer.
            Technically, the means of production are largely privately owned,
            thus not a textbook case of socialism.

            The reputation for “socialism” here derives from very high
            levels of taxation, and a heavily redistributionist system,
            which, however you or I might dislike it, is NOT actually
            socialism.

            On reflection, there is obviously a break-even point where
            for an individual the amount of taxes paid equals the amount
            of benefits received (such as essentially free university
            education, essentially free medical care etc). The location
            of that point is hard to calculate for many reasons, and varies
            with such things as how many children you have, but I guesstimate
            it to average an income of about USD 60000.

            It has been calculated that a professional in the maximum
            tax bracket (which you reach quickly enough) pays about
            75% of his MARGINAL income in taxes, including a large chunk paid
            as VAT., payroll taxes on the employer etc, but NOT corporate
            income tax. (Marginal means the tax on any increment in income.)

            Thor

          • SFG says:

            Jewish women are proud, verbal, aggressive, and outspoken. Why do you think there’s so much intermarriage?

        • Anon says:

          Wrong. Jews brought upon us the fembot/commie/multicultu calamity.
          But it took another jew to end the madness (Hartiste).

          I guess we’re even now

          • Anon says:

            Although sometimes I suspect CH is the beginning of another big ass jew conspiracy.
            Maybe they’re not done playing with our little brains yet.

          • chi-town says:

            Perhaps it is one, but Jews are often the primary victims. Jews fuck with other Jews more than anyone else.

          • Stark says:

            Just wondering something.
            Do you consider “Jews” a whole, united group with an agenda? Or do you think that there are different subgroups among the Jews, of which, some (maybe the more dominant) brought about feminism?

          • Anon says:

            The first hypothesis is for paranoid weirdo freaks who lost touch with reality.

            The second seems more plausible, although even those sub-groups don’t really have an agenda per se. They are just guided by their relatively high IQ, persecution complex (which is understandable), and also influenced by talmud teachings (reconstructing babel tower by them chosen people and that kind of stuff).

          • Heartiste is a kike?! No fucking way brah.

          • Anon says:

            You think there is a gentile smart enough to come up with this shit?

            Besides, he said it himself. But like “uh” once said: “H doesn’t let his jew come between us”.

      • Deutsch says:

        Should’ve just let us get done with them

        • but my mom was a holocausts survivorz and is jewish and da good jews have cretaed many good things

          albert einsetin was a noble soulz

          “It is only to the individual that a soul is given.” -Einstein

          “Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices, but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence.”

          “If one were to take that goal out of out of its religious form and look merely at its purely human side, one might state it perhaps thus: free and responsible development of the individual, so that he may place his powers freely and gladly in the service of all mankind.”

          “The highest principles for our aspirations and judgments are given to us in the Jewish-Christian religious tradition.”–Albert Einstein

          it is wealth-transferring and rigts-destorying fmeinisns that we are against, not da alebert einetsines and da noble spirtz and souls!

          • Thor says:

            Yup. Albert was a socialist. This is but one example of that brilliance in one sphere of life does not guarantee even competence in another.

            But reality is worse than Einstein.

            Happenstance celebrities are worshipped as political gurus. And the achievement of celebrity status contains a LARGE random factor.
            That´s another of Albert’s mistakes, he said “Gott würfelt nicht”, which
            is wrong. On the other hand, maybe the dice play God.

            Thor

          • SFG says:

            Wait…your MOM was a Holocaust survivor? WW2 ended in 1945. How old are you?

          • Greg Eliot says:

            Heh, Judeo-Christian…

            There isn’t a conference of victims and robbers,
            There isn’t a conference of temperance and booze,
            There isn’t a conference of chickens and foxes,
            So why have a conference of Christians and Jews?

        • gig says:

          Agreed

        • SFG says:

          Why? It cost you the Bomb and possibly the war.

          Fermi only came over here because they were hassling his (Jewish) wife.

          If you guys had stuck to killing Gypsies and commies half of Europe would be speaking German by now.

          • Greg Eliot says:

            Aye, there’s the rub… most of the commie agitators and behind-the-scenes puppet masters throughout Europe ‘just happened’ to be Jews.

          • SFG says:

            Yup. If you’d stuck to killing actual commies instead of chasing people’s ancestry to the second generation you would have won your war.

      • uh says:

        At last! zlzozoz

  2. I tried it out. Hurt my balls.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Depending upon context, there is nothing wrong with sitting like this.

  4. Levon says:

    One is a statue. The other is a cat. I’m neither.

    • Anon says:

      It’s a beach full of bubble-butt girls wearing dental floss bikinis, and someone goes up with a statue of a skinny, bald, bespectacled nerd???

  5. A good seating-posture rule of thumb is that it should be slightly irritating to males around you. E.g. seated in your chair, leaning back, with your arm resting on the neighboring chair.

    • Joe Eoj says:

      I occasionally find myself occupying as many as five chairs simultaneously. (No, not by being fat.)

      In fairness to the statue though, it’s *really* hard to sit comfortably on a hard backless marble bench like that.

    • sandwich artist at subway says:

      arronski, I spend too much time sitting in meetings. my Army lifer dad always warned me never to sit in ways that conveyed disrespect to my seniors. The military is full of men who are acutely sensitive to (imagined) disrespect from subordinates. His salute could be sloppy as fuck but he’d ream the ass of some d-bag major who did likewise. How he sat in meetings depended on who else was in the room. I agree that pissing off other guys is generally a good move — just know who you’re pissing off.

  6. Anti Blue pill says:

    A bit OT, haha Liberalism and Feminist garbage backfires on the muslim helping cunt

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/07/09/Feminist-Journo-Finds-Liberal-Culture-Turned-Against-Her

    • Thor says:

      Actually, very much on topic. Left-liberalism is chock full of internal contradictions, one of them being that one must be tolerant of,
      indeed worshipful of other people´s cultures. This is OK until you
      run into another culture that is itself very INtolerant, and the
      contradiction explodes – but few notice.

      Thor

      • Anti Blue pill says:

        OT,on topic see what i did there? haha

        Hit the nail on the head,What you more or less describe is the old axiom of “an unstoppable force meets an immovable object” And it’s my deepest hope that those multicultural Butt sniffers suffer from this axiom.

      • sandwich artist at subway says:

        no contradiction, thor. kantian ethics scalled up to level of culture means we respect other cultures that respect us and our culture. i have no problem smashing backward, intolerant cultures and i’m as liberal as they come.

        • Thor says:

          “I have no problem smashing backward cultures and I am as liberal as they come”.

          Now, with contemporary definitions of “liberal”, that’s a contradiction right off the bat.

          Thor

    • Anon says:

      He rants against liberalism and yet complains like a liberal bitch about the arab male chauvinist culture.
      I prefer chauvinism to his PC bitching. He’s more feminist-friendly than he thinks.

      • Anti Blue pill says:

        No kidding dude The conservative to libertarian leaning websites that i visit
        on a daily basis are just as bad at regurgitating Feminist qweef logic.

        However Hotair.com do post scientific studies that support the Chateau logic.
        maybe one of the hotair contributors visits here or some other anti-misandrist sites?

      • SFG says:

        Whatever. Arabs may be macho but their culture is trash.

        For crying out loud, they let the Jews beat them in wars! I mean, I can see losing to Jews in science or business. But war?

        • Stuki says:

          Battles. Not the war.

        • Thor says:

          Yes, Arab culture is now trash. They had some kind of renaissance around the same time as the Western world did, but then they veered into religious fanaticism, total cronyism and other malfunctions. Also, polygyny when widely practiced produces and underclass of unmarried forced-celibate men (note that Western society is now heading the same way, albeit unofficially).

          Technically, Islam is a religion highly optimized — for a tribe whose main source of income is raiding caravans. (But ships off the coast of Somaliland will do).

          On the other hand, Jews and everybody else fight very well when losing equals death or enslavement. Cf the Moslem Al Tarik who understood this,
          and took his troops into the Iberian Peninsula, and upon arrival, burned his ships. That’s incentive, folks!

          Oh, the mountain on which he solidified his position (mountain = Jebr or Jebal in Arabic), got the name Jebr-Al-Taric, shortened to Gibraltar.

          Thor

  7. itsme says:

    i sit like that when i need to pee really bad.

  8. Anonymous says:

    I think the lean (forward or backward) and other body language trumps whether the legs are crossed. Case in point:

    http://thisorthat.com/blog/five-reasons-crossing-your-legs-like-a-chick-is-manly

    • chi-town says:

      True that crossed legs is contextual. Its in combination with other loser postures. I think the scrunched up knees together like a little girl trying not to wet herself is far worse. Something along the lines of embarrassment…

    • collapseofman says:

      Obama counts as a negative point

      • Rick Derris says:

        The guy who wrote the “5 Reasons Crossing Your Legs Like a Chick is Manly” article needs a punch in the face. Then let him pay the f*cking taxes for Obamacare.

        Don’t even try to put Odumbo in the same class as James…TIBERIUS…Kirk.

    • johndraper says:

      I’m not convinced. At all.

  9. The Windy City's Forum Supporter says:

    CH,

    A modified version of the picture has been emailed to you alongside a small PayPal token of appreciation for the patronage of your continued authorship.

  10. Backdoor Man says:

    I want to get a “This is what a misogynist looks like” tee shirt. It will be a real conversation starter. In fact, if played well, I predict it will land you considerable tail.

  11. Anon says:

    If I was a chick, that cat would make me sooo wet.

  12. Anon says:

    That’s how old men sit, especially outside the western world as mentioned before.
    The chateau had posted better logos for beta BL.

  13. chi-town says:

    Isn’t that really the alum posture of a fat girl feminist trying to compensate for being loose by overuse in her search for validation?

  14. Adrian says:

    Beautiful. I salute you.

  15. shiva1008 says:

    Sitting with legs crossed and leaning back can be aristocratic. But I don’t do it anymore because people would misunderstand, and it would make me a target for AMOGs.

  16. Maru is the best says:

    There are some poses that cats can get away with that humans can’t. That is one. Sitting with your legs in the air licking your own butthole is another.

    I recommend this to the blogger: http://tinyurl.com/6tfnns5

    He has the posture of someone who knows what he’s doing and won’t take shit from anyone. The box shows he doesn’t give a fuck what anyone thinks of him. No wonder so many women adore him.

  17. yeahokcool says:

    i disagree with this simplistic assessment. every man in my family sits this way and, by all accounts, does so rather comfortably. we have all done just fine with women and would not be described as feminized men or anything similar to that. perhaps this is cultural? though my family is american, we are of italian decent and i understand this sitting posture is rather common in europe.

    • Anon says:

      The men in my husband’s family sit this way, as well – all from Italian and Slovak descent. Trust me: the women cater to them.

    • johndraper says:

      See? He’s solved it. It’s not gay, it’s European.

      If you’ll excuse me, I have some sitting to do.

  18. Sam Spade says:

    Context matters. Sean Connery can sit with his legs crossed and get away with it. The 25-year-old hipster with skinny jeans and a v-neck is not afforded the same latitude. But as a rule of thumb, keep your legs open.

  19. askjoe says:

    wow. just wow.*

    *=surprised noone said it yet, in fun.

  20. askjoe says:

    srsly tho, the host and other circular evolutionists (it’s fit because it survives because it’s fit) noted the similarities of alpha ape behaviors. The alpha shows off the vulnerable goods around his subordinates while the beta protect their precious nutsack because who would dare attack the alpha.

    What worse with modern libs is that these guys are apparently doing it to protect other people from their balls. Which is fine, I guess. Who cares. The white knight lies alone.

  21. Greg Eliot says:

    Sitting is, ipso facto, beta.

  22. This is a statue of a literary hero of a nation, the poet Carlos Drummond de Andrade. He used to walk to Copacabana and sit pensively for a while, almost every day.

    To take this statue as a simbol of “decay of the West” not only misses the point but is absolutely obnoxious. It would be the same as taking Hemmingway and using as a symbold of the depression epidemic of the West, personified in emo kids.

    I wont call Drummond a mincy beta the same way I would never call Hemmingway a depressed emo sissyfuck.

    Its just plain ignorant.

    • null says:

      Leaving hatred aside and going to Wikipedia:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Drummond_de_Andrade:

      Carlos Drummond de Andrade (October 31, 1902 – August 17, 1987) was perhaps the most influential Brazilian poet of the 20th century. He has become something of a national poet; his poem “Canção Amiga” (“Friendly Song”) was printed on the 50 cruzados bill. He is considered to be among the greatest Brazilian poets of all time.

      So who’s next in line to be a feminized Western Male? I’m curious.

      • Joe Eoj says:

        I bet he got some fine Brazilian tail.

        • Jorge Luis Borges was immensely famous, but he pedestalised women in his well-bred Latin way, and he didn’t seem to get much tail. I think that writer Michel Houellebecq (sp?) also misses out due to being a try-hard and a creep. Our Australian poet, AD Hope, wrote about sex a lot, but I am not sure that he got much. And another prominent Australian poet, Douglas Stewart?, got cuckolded.

      • DirkJohanson says:

        Poets are omega.

    • Goga says:

      So? Hans Christian Andersen was a great Danish author, fairy tale writer, and poet. He is very famous. His poetry and stories have been translated into more than 150 languages. They have inspired motion pictures, plays, ballets, and animated films. However, he was a mincy beta and died a virgin.

    • pulsotic says:

      Most poets are feminized men. It fits.
      and if Hemingway used the same body language as emo kids, that would work too.

      • Pardon, I dont think it does.

        You see, its not like the west became a civilization of poets.

        There was a time when the few talented artists were allowed to have milder manners. Somehow it seems to come with such an overt sensibility that is part of them.

        But that is an exception.

        And this exception did NOT become the rule. That is: you see many “men” behaving with the same afectations of some great poets of the past, except they dont have any particular talent – they sit bent because, from a perspective of manliness, they are empty vessels.

        You see where I am getting at: correlate them with a poet misses the point.

        I get the message about the body posture. It was spot on. But the fact the man in the statue is not an ordinary castratti, ends up defeating the point it tried to make.

        What happend to hebs walking cats on leashes? That was a good enough icon.

  23. Anon says:

    Okay, that cat? Adorbs.

  24. A1ADD1N says:

    I’ve always been disgusted with this position-Faggotry

  25. rek5 says:

    me the fuck ow.

  26. Firepower says:

    Do we really need ANOTHER Classic archetype Beta Symbol?
    If the ten thousand already in existence don’t do the trick
    and chase the sissy out of western males

    one more ain’t gonna do it, chief.
    Problem AIN’T the number of symbols
    Problem is the idiots that don’t recognize them…

    When you have TOO MANY ‘classics’
    none are classic

  27. Mindfucked says:

    Your average hipster actually gets laid quite a bit more than a ‘mainstream’ state university college football fan bro. The hipster attitude of irony, unjustified superiority and mild/moderate dandyism is a pussy moistener even among non hipster women. It is also a signal that you are aware of what’s considered ‘cool’ at the moment and thus have at least some social savvy which is a DHV.

    • Fluffy McGee says:

      Man, I’ve been out of the states for too long… I still can’t figure out what the fuck a hipster is…

    • Stuki says:

      The Hipsters’ most important tool of pickup trade is venue selection. Operating in a large enough clique, their brand of mildly amusing, derogatory ‘jokes’ about those less hip helps position them as alpha in the minds of the women in the same clique.

      In a larger venue where ‘everyone’ is open to interaction with everyone else, they fall completely flat when faced by more overtly aggressive and ‘threatening’ males.

      Which makes it even more idiotic that they so vehemently oppose political and social organization forms that favors intentional, say gated, communities; and where their main forte vis-a-vis more thuggish types, their ability to produce something useful, is a more important determinant of male attractiveness.

    • Agreed. Not in that the college football bro’s aren’t getting laid or anything, but there’s been a more diverse range of DHVs from I R MANLY in recent times. Having a bemused, disdainful demeanour works on the SWPLs anyway, the raw manly thing still being a hit with the proles.

  28. Goddamn I hate skinny jeans.

  29. Anon2 says:

    I found a poll that is measuring misandry awareness.

    Go vote !

    But the results are far, far more encouraging than we might expect.

  30. M3 says:

    Captain Picard sat like that, only straighter back, not jello spined.

    Picard kicked ass across the galaxy. And he was picking up some serious tail along the way.

    Not as much as Kirk.. but still respectable.

    And now i have said too much and let my inner nerd off the leash.

    • corvinus says:

      Fictional characters don’t count.

      • SFG says:

        Yes and no. To resonate with people they have to have some real aspects. Otherwise they’re not believable. An actor adopts a certain body posture to convey a certain attitude, which in Patrick Stewart’s case was sophistication and command.

        Besides, remember–he’s European. There’s no reason the same things have to be alpha and beta across the pond.

  31. Mast Vajority says:

    Haven’t lost hand completely but this is bugging me.

    In short the scales are dipping into her favor…her getting attention and im getting the short stick…of inattention…no chance for alone time and for my needs (sex) met.

    We fucked once bout a week ago. On the next visit i hung out w her and her BFF all night…no pussy. Whatev i was chill. Visited her place last night. She lives with her sister, and theyre very close. The sister invited the BFF over again. blegh.

    I felt like my girl wasnt exactly wanting the night to go like that….but i think she cared alot what her sis and friend thought. So she went along with it. i bailed soon after the friend showed. Im not her GF.

    She’ll hit me up within the week, so what would be the better way to rev her hamster when she texts?

    1.)Silence?

    2.) Active, emotionally-neutral brush off? “sorry im busy” “im busy” or “got plans”)

    • passingby says:

      You had sex once, she blue-balled you twice, and now you are waiting around for her to text you?

      A woman who wanted you sexually would kick her friend, her sister, her ailing mother, and her own child outside the house to get at you. Getting you alone would be a priority for her. Clearly, sex with you is not her priority.

    • Doc says:

      This is why you need to have a dependable supply line – so when one hits the skids you have others to pick up the slack. Invite her out with a group and split you time chatting up other potentials in the group, or flirting with other targets and her. Do not put her in the position of power you are giving her – women do not like it, and it isn’t beneficial to you…

  32. Somewhat OT, ahem. Chicks love jerks and thugs even more. Particularly the youngest, hottest. I hate being right.

  33. Joe Sixpack says:

    100% OT, but since we’re speaking of feminized, cuckolded male behavior…

    Woman, 34, who fell pregnant after fling with Turkish barman says her husband has forgiven her – and shockingly, claims affair SAVED their marriage

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2171580/Women-34-fell-pregnant-fling-Turkish-barman-says-husband-forgiven–shockingly-claims-affair-SAVED-marriage.html#ixzz20HPOeMQv

    AND…

    Guy tries to win back his ex with a fullblown webpage in which he lays out ridiculous concessions to her if she will take him back. (I think she’s already moved on to another guy).

    I actually feel sorry for this guy, as he really needs to swallow the bitter red pill before this girl-who-got-away and the notoriety soon to ensue consumes him.

    http://gawker.com/5924922/poor-ex+boyfriend-takes-google-commercial-to-heart-in-the-worst-way-possible

  34. Suburban_elk says:

    The original post for this thread is off the mark. (The wrong target.)

    The man’s posture is erect and attentive. He is leaning on nothing but his back. Dick swinging has its place, it worked for David Lee Roth (somehow), but what, We want mature men doing the muh dick dance? Game has its critics who mis-represent what it is as that.

    *******************
    I noticed this posture in my travels as well. Grizzled tough old men, with nothing to lean on. American PUA’s calling them into question is ripe.

    Some of the comments on this thread remind me of those on a thread about having a cat on a leash. They got into this back and forth whether it was alpha to have a dog moreso than a cat, or when which exceptions might apply. Talk about missing the forest for the trees.

    Yes there are patterns, of course. And listing out some rules, sure. But really; walk your cat, sit pensitivo, … your terms, your symbols, your life.

  35. truth says:

    that cat is awesome

  36. ossie says:

    The idea that crossing your legs is effeminate, is I think a recent development specific to American culture. It’s part of the whole shift towards a divide between the weeblish on one side and an exaggerated, gym-bulked frat boy masculinity on the other, a caricature of masculinity assumed by the insecure. Similar to the idea that liking cats is effeminate or some such bullshit.

  37. Jason says:

    I was always told that crossing your legs, ankle to knee, was masculine and American, and that crossing your legs knee-over-knee was weak and European.

    I do both, depending on mood.

    H, couldn’t you have found a better example than one of Brazil’s most beloved national poets?

  38. sand says:

    heartiste,you forgot to mention the clean shaved man.

  39. Gorbachev says:

    Famous poets get laid because…

    They’re famous.

    if you’re in a creative industry, you can’t keep the tail off you (relatively to basic SMV). Poetry is kinda beta, in a very serious way, unless you happen to be a Viking who sacks small villages and raids monasteries who also writes poetry about it.

    I’m going to bet the young ladies swooned for such “poets”.

    Alternatively, being a famous poet helps.

    Do you see the important word in that sentence?

    Famous.

    Fame is the great pussy loosener. If available, apply it generously.

  40. Adam says:

    That’s how Al Pacino sits in The Godfather. Don Michael Corleone is far from a beta.

  41. Anton says:

    Lots of leg crossers amonst the commenters….hmmm….

  42. j says:

    I wonder what kind of Jews you are talking about. Here in Jerusalem we have separate buses and seats for men and women, walk on different sides of the street, there are no female singers and of course females are never called up to read the Torah in public. Jewish marriage contract is, in fact, an Aramaic sales agreement fully enforceable in the rabbinical courts of Israel. You could learn something if you read one.

  43. Maya says:

    Cat is so cute!

  44. Backdoor Man says:

    Wanna keep your wife happy? Do it like this guy.

    • itsme says:

      yep. he doesn’t respond to her bitching. ‘woman, i know what i’m doing.’

      her mouth says ‘no no no NO! slow down!!’ but her facial expression and body language screams ‘FASTER HARDER DEEPER!!!’

      imagine how the betamax version of this would have played out.

      p.s. TITTIES

    • Ollie says:

      That bit of real life behavior offers a stark contrast to that retarded Abarth commercial with the bespectacled beta.

    • corvinus says:

      Italians are so fun

    • askjoe says:

      also note the rather obvious age difference…

      Great video, love her face at the end and all her Italian cursing.

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Bravo, Ricardo!

  45. mangos says:

    Is this an American thing where anything uncivilized (sitting like an uncultured African ape) is considered “alpha” and being the least bit reserved and polite is beta/gay/dandy? Call me a beta-loving female then, because that other option is embarrassing.

    This is part of why I’m not attracted to American men.

    • Thor says:

      As is often the case with social issues, it is context-dependent, especially audience-dependent. There is a fine line between assertiveness and boorishness. Sitting spread out a little on an otherwise empty bench is one thing, spreading out in a bus where many are standing is being obnoxious.

      In general, assertiveness is best done VERY CALMLY. Somebody being a load pain in the ass is trying too hard. In other words, as in many cases, YMMV.

      Thor

    • chi-town says:

      False dichotomy is so uncivilized, like fire and brimstone sermons in a country church. Unless I tuck my balls like Ray Finkle, I must know the location of every fire hydrant.

      Beautiful women are well apprised of subtitles in the cathedrals of power, witnessing the compromises of heaven and hell everyday. You seem to have the ham fisted philosophy of the provincials because you could never turn a nobleman’s head.

      • mangos says:

        Noup. I’m more like the 8/10 that ignored your advances in high school but thanks for playing :P

        • chi-town says:

          hausfraudian hints like no-up and man-go suggests that its the only slip of the tongue you will get without a dog and some peanut butter.

        • Pulsotic says:

          Even if you were attractive, your attitude here is not. And it is the attitude here that we can use to deduce your status on the 1-10 scale.

          8′s, 9′s, 10′s are not trolling blogs so we can rule those out.
          What is likely is 5 and under. Those are the women who have the sour grapes mentality and hate on things they are not able to attain. You will never get to bang an alpha and you’re just going to have to live with it. Hating and lying via internet to random people won’t change that.

    • Deutsch says:

      It’s alright, American men are not attracted to you either.

    • pulsotic says:

      I get the most attention when i’m spread out and taking up space. Heads don’t turn when I sit closed up. Women are like politicians: watch what they do, not what they say.
      I’ll stop sitting like a boss when women stop rewarding me.

      • mangos says:

        Their heads are probably turning to judge how ridiculous and uneducated you look. Like the type of man who puts his feet on the table. But I guess any kind of female attention is all you’re desperate for.

        • Pulsotic says:

          Hater.
          It has nothing to do with your overtly biased, female opinion. It has to do with being unaffected by your judgement (or anyone else’s) and sitting like that anyway. It’s merely a physical manifestation of my inner attitude: confidence.
          It may be easier to describe by it’s antithesis to you since (judging by your hating) you have no intrinsic point of reference.
          That attitude is NOT:
          Shame of one’s sexuality.
          Fear of being judged (especially by inferior people).

  46. chi-town says:

    We are all beta now. Alpha daddy Obama and his harem:

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/single-women-put-obama-top-poll/story?id=16754370

    Is there any better example of a the weakness of a democracy than the single mama?

  47. Island says:

    How about the increased amount of women behind the wheel of her lipstick mobile while the boyfriend sits shoot-gun with his foot hanging out of the window asking if he can change the station?

    The more of this I see, the more I pick up what heartiste puts down.

  48. Poochie says:

    Speaking of weak, pathetic, feminized “men.”

    I WANT to believe this is trolling of a hapless, cat-consoled advice columnist, but sadly I don’t think it is. Beta of the Month candidate.

    http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/relationships/blog/2012/07/she_doesnt_want_people_to_thin.html?p1=Upbox_links

  49. Burton says:

    You are the “cat’s meow”!

  50. No Comment says:

    “‘Cannibal’ Luka Magnotta Attracts Obsessed Female Fans”

    http://abcnews.go.com/International/cannibal-luka-magnotta-attracts-obsessed-female-fans/story?id=16749690

    “For Lexa, a 30-year-old married mother of two, who runs the blog Luka Magnotta Obsession, her infatuation with the accused cannibal started by following news stories about his arrest.

    “Basically, the big part for me is that I’m absolutely fascinated by this character,” she told ABC News, explaining that she started the blog as a way to “explore her feelings of obsession.” She spoke on the condition she be identified only by her first name.

    Over time, she said, her feelings have shifted from obsessive observer to “bordering on” a crush, blogging about romantic dreams involving Magnotta and trying to keep her obsession and the blog a secret from her husband.

    Lexa said she believes Magnotta likely murdered Lin, but that only adds to his mystique.”

    “He’s a bad boy,” she said. “I’ve always been attracted to bad boys. Good boys are boring.” “

    • Ollie says:

      5
      minutes
      of
      alpha.

    • Anon says:

      Oh my god, I’m so shocked.
      Who’d a thunk it?

      • Jason says:

        Spin hamster, spin!

        “On the other hand is a lost boy who allegedly committed a heinous crime and it appears that the reason for such may not have been some psychopathic urge, but rather and even more so a slap in the face to society! I don’t believe he enjoyed the things he allegedly did in that video. To me it seems like he may just have been going through the motions for shock value. There’s a recording of Luka’s voice where he is getting upset about a family guy episode. He discusses how sick and twisted necrophilia is. I honestly believe that is how he truly feels, like 99.9% of the rest of us. If he is guilty, I can only imagine that he was rebelling back against a society that was so cruel to him and ignored his cries for help for so long! He is just extremely confused and had too many wrongs committed against him.”

        • Jason says:

          Hey, I’m the only Jason around here. Wanna find a different handle, “Jason”?

          BTW, Luka sounds messed up.

    • itsme says:

      don’t let the fact that he prefers sausage to clams deter you. ladies.

  51. Anonymous says:

    After visiting Europe, recently, I have become even more disgusted and repelled by American men.

    “I don’t always sit, but when I do, I sit like a boss.”

    Both legs spread far apart, that says; I own this space and everything in it. That is hot.

  52. Does anybody know what happened to onestdv?

    – Arturo

    • SFG says:

      He’s been saying he wants to quit for a while. I think he just got sick of the blogging thing. His post where he mocked the standard alt-right post kind of gave you an idea where he was heading.

  53. Serenety says:

    I think what is even worse is the voice on most “men” today.

    Most that I hear sound like prepubescent boys who’s voice hasn’t even broken yet.

    I’m talking about men who when I hear them speak their voice is “tinny, whiny and high pitched” and these are men who’s age range all the way up to their 50′s and beyond.

    I turned on the radio today (which I rarely do these days) and all the male presenters voices were barely distinguishable from the chicks, 30 year olds speaking with the voices of 14 year olds, plaintive, high pitched talking at 200 miles an hour, they even speak like this in the commercials that are played!

    It turns me right off, I can imagine what the women feel about this.

    A Deep Manly Resonant Voice and sound is a confirmed panty wetter, get thee to a voice coach

    [heartiste: hey there baby. this town ain’t big enough for the both of us. oooh yeeeeeeeeaaahhhh….]

  54. Soldado says:

    Search for “Carlos Drummond de Andrade copacabana” on Google images.

  55. Anonymous says:

    Having testicles and muscular thighs eliminates the ability to cross ones legs like the beta displayed. Do some squats and you won’t have to worry about what sitting like that looks like.

    • Fluffy McGee says:

      This is pretty spot on, haven’t been able to sit like this for a while myself, and it doesn’t require much muscle either.

    • D-Man says:

      Agree.

      Narrow hips + developed muscles + big balls = no way to do this comfortably.

    • askjoe says:

      good point, any leg muscle and even if you prefer crossing your legs, your ankle will be resting on your knee…you cannot sit knee to knee or knee over knee.

  56. Serenety says:

    And now a joke, for those that haven’t already seen it elsewhere.

    Husband Store

    A store that sells new husbands has opened in New York City , where a woman may go to choose a husband. Among the instructions at the entrance is a description of how the store operates:

    You may visit this store ONLY ONCE! There are six floors and the value of the products increase as the shopper ascends the flights. The shopper may choose any item from a particular floor, or may choose to go up to the next floor, but you cannot go back down except to exit the building!

    So, a woman goes to the Husband Store to find a husband. On the first floor the sign on the door reads:

    Floor 1 – These men Have Jobs

    She is intrigued, but continues to the second floor, where the sign reads:

    Floor 2 – These men Have Jobs and Love Kids.

    ‘That’s nice,’ she thinks, ‘but I want more.’

    So she continues upward. The third floor sign reads:

    Floor 3 – These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, and are Extremely Good Looking.

    ‘Wow,’ she thinks, but feels compelled to keep going.

    She goes to the fourth floor and the sign reads:

    Floor 4 – These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, are Drop-dead Good Looking and Help With Housework.

    ‘Oh, mercy me!’ she exclaims, ‘I can hardly stand it!’

    Still, she goes to the fifth floor and the sign reads:

    Floor 5 – These men Have Jobs, Love Kids, are Drop-dead Gorgeous, Help with Housework, and Have a Strong Romantic Streak.

    She is so tempted to stay, but she goes to the sixth floor, where the sign reads:

    Floor 6 – You are visitor 31,456,012 to this floor. There are no men on this floor. This floor exists solely as proof that women are impossible to please. Thank you for shopping at the Husband Store.

    PLEASE NOTE:

    To avoid gender bias charges, the store’s owner opened a New Wives store just across the street.

    The first floor has wives that love sex.

    The second floor has wives that love sex and have money and like beer

    The third, fourth, fifth and sixth floors have never been visited.

  57. traditional girl says:

    I almost always agree with CH’s posts on body language, but I’ve just got to say: an erudite, aristocratically built, and powerful man with crossed legs is just so goddamned hot to me. It’s a contemplative pose. An insouciant pose.

    And yet it’s a pose that, admittedly, I could only stand seeing on the smartest, most confident man in the room.

    I might be a serious anomaly on this one. And sure, a brute with huge muscles might not be able to cross his legs. But you know who doesn’t need huge muscles? The man who tells him what to do.

    • chi-town says:

      That is not an “insouciant” pose. Its the opposite. One could interpret it as having disapproval with both crossed legs and arms at the angle of his posture. Where does he place the cross hair? That is really what the nuance is. In fact, imagine a woman sitting next to him. Would it change the posture if it was away from her while she is sitting on his right, in her direction on his left, or directly at her kiddy corner? The latter of the 3 is probably the one to salvage the posture the most. Women love beta sandwiched between acts of alpha which is the mark of more than a brute. One is a closing off into the empty space while the other is in the direction of his focused disapproval. However it is anything but “carefree”. Its closed off. And to be more clear on this point, a man who lovingly pets his dog after defenestrating someone who insulted his dog is that alpha beta mix women love so much.

    • john says:

      So when you read Of Mice And Men you were hot for Lenny?

  58. Mr. C says:

    I just read an interesting medical statistic.

    If a woman delivers and breast feeds her first child before she is 20, she has about half the risk of breast cancer than either a mother who had her first child after the age of 30, or a woman who has never had a child.

    You can’t argue with nature ladies.

    • Orion says:

      I believe there is also a study that shows chances for breast cancer triple for women that have an abortion. Considering the chemical and hormonal changes that are being short circuited it doesn’t sound surprising at all.

      • corvinus says:

        I decided to see what was happening with breast cancer in what was the abortion capital of the world, Russia:

        http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/4/900.full
        Mortality from breast cancer has risen steadily in both countries over the past 40 years, although faster in Russia than in Ukraine. There are strong birth cohort effects, which are consistent with known changes in fertility. Death rates were highest among those born in the first half of the 20th century, declining among those born after the 1950s. There has been a decline in mortality among younger women since the mid 1990s, which may reflect improvements in treatment.

        “Among younger women”, eh? No dumbass, “improved methods of treatment” would have helped older women too. It’s because the 1990s was when abortions dropped by about half in Russia (they’ve dropped another half since then), and younger women are those more likely to get pregnant and get an abortion.

      • Beer Monkey says:

        Exhaustive scientific research has been done and it turns out the abortion -> breast cancer thing is totally bullshit. It’s just some shit that some Jesus freaks came up with to scare people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion%E2%80%93breast_cancer_hypothesis

        Beware christians and their junk science.

  59. Leo says:

    Another poet statue in Recife, Brazil:
    http://www.solarnet.tv/reports/pics/3607/3607_1258547773_0.jpg

    [heartiste: that one is more alpha. the statue is leaning back, surveying his kingdom.]

  60. Tyrone says:

    From http://decoded.nationaljournal.com/2012/07/from-bad-to-worse-with-bluecol.php

    A source of better news for Obama in both the Quinnipiac Poll (which gave him a narrow 46 percent to 43 percent lead), and the ABC/Post survey (which showed him and Romney tied at 47 percent) is the persistence of his support among college-educated white women, consistently the most Democratic-leaning segment of the white electorate. Quinnipiac shows Obama drawing 52 percent of those women, unchanged from April; in the ABC/Post poll he attracts 49 percent, down a tick from 51 percent in May. Obama won 52 percent of those women in 2008, and Democrats have carried them in each of the past five elections except for 2004, when the split almost evenly between Kerry and George W. Bush. Obama’s success at holding them, though, marks a major improvement from 2010, when exit polls showed these women joining all other whites in moving sharply toward the GOP in Congressional races.

    This is the enemy that must be defeated.

  61. If someone could crop this and zoom in, that would be great. Better yet, if someone could find a human version of the above pose, with one hand propped under chin, eyes watery with intense listening, even better. Nothing quite captures the essence of the de-balled 21st Century Western male better than this sitting pose, imo.

    Challenge accepted.

    http://rationalmale.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/fem-male_logo.gif

    Delivered.

  62. Anon says:

    Politically correct retardation reaches new heights:

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/out_of_the_question_YegJJGCOo33j0CQsccdZuL

    “In a bizarre case of political correctness run wild, educrats have banned references to “dinosaurs,” “birthdays,” “Halloween” and dozens of other topics on city-issued tests.”

    • Greg Eliot says:

      You know the Apocalypse is nigh when a man can’t even offend Jehovah’s Witnesses.

  63. Maya says:

    For nothing strikes at the molten hot core of the female id like a dna test that can put an end to her genetic directive to cuckoldry. 16 minutes ago

    You’re being paranoid, unnecessarily.

    [heartiste: no. women do have a genetic directive to cuckoldry, just as men have a genetic directive to sleep around. that doesn’t mean they will obey that directive at all times. it just means that it’s there, and any tech intervention that robs them of the option to exercise the cuckoldry ur-lie will send shivers down their spines.]

    I’m sure that 95% of women wouldn’t be able to lie to their boyfriends/husbands.

    [i sometimes wonder if you’re an alien sent here to study humanity but lacking the requisite tools to see more than the most transparent social interactions.]

    Actually, I don’t really understand men complaining about this problem

    [yes you do. you’re lying again you cunty troll. you know damn well that unwittingly raising another man’s child is as gruesomely repugnant to men as being forced to bear and raise an omega rapist’s child is to women.]

    – they can test their children’s dna whenever they want if they really are that pathetic …

    [are women who have been victimized by rape pathetic for allowing a rape dna kit to be used on them to help put the perp behind bars?]

    • chi-town says:

      Those wristbands to insure identity that they put on babies in maternity are pathetic. A baby is a baby.

  64. Anonymous says:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Drummond_de_Andrade
    The biography of the statue, for anyone interested.

  65. Rick Derris says:

    I saw some interesting evidence of cuckoldry, or as I prefer, the GBFM “alpha fucks and beta bucks” theorem.

    A friend showed me a bunch of profiles on an online dating site. Most were decent looking chicks, but all were either divorced or never married and they all had kids. All had some type of admission along the lines of “I made wrong choices” or “I was into the ‘bad boys’” – one even admitted she was a stripper and another was looking for a guy who had “never hit a woman.” So they clearly were putting out that they had ridden the alpha khaaak carousel (note: that scumbag Dante Hicks, whose girlfriend I used to f*ck while they were dating, pronounces “cock” as “khaaak”), but were looking for a beta to take care of them and their kids.

    Why would sane man waste his time on any of these skanks? They’re good for a pump & dump only (and be sure they are on the pill and you double-proof). They’re basically SCREAMING that they still need alpha khaaak bukakke yet want some poor guy to pay the bills.

    I pity any guy who gets stuck with them. Imagine taking care of some other guy’s brat while the mother/Mrs is out getting lotsa cocksas and butt-THexed.

    We are so fucking fucked as a society :( :( :(

  66. […] at Harvard where he participated in boxing matches… I wonder what Heartiste would analyze on his body language. Like this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the […]

Leave a Reply