Ugly people canoodling in public.
It’s not cute. It’s not charming. It doesn’t make people go “aww” to themselves.
Please, kindly take your ugly nuzzling to the privacy of your homes and draw the shades. Think of the beautiful people’s feelings.
Where pretty lies perish.
Dec 2nd, 2007 by Heartiste
Ugly people canoodling in public.
It’s not cute. It’s not charming. It doesn’t make people go “aww” to themselves.
Please, kindly take your ugly nuzzling to the privacy of your homes and draw the shades. Think of the beautiful people’s feelings.
Posted in Funny/Lolblogs, The Big City Life
Family sizes have been shrinking all over the developed world.
The downstream psychological and societal impacts of only children are greatly under-appreciated by researchers.
For instance, fewer children means parents have less incentive to discipline or chastise those children for bad life choices. A parent is likely to fear losing the love of an only child more than would a parent fear losing the love of one of her six children.
If an only child decides to troon out, her parents might be hesitant to express much displeasure and disapproval because they don't have any other children to fill the void if that tranny-child decides to rescind her love.
Something like this dynamic, on a large societal scale, has serious implications for the shape of the culture and the willingness of parents to administer tough love. Pampered only children become vehicles for cultural degeneracy by drawing in fearful parents to sustain the system.
Butting into this conversation, I have complicated feelings about AI. It is a weapon that we absolutely must not allow the Left to monopolize. The potential to seriously undermine leftoid cultural hegemony via right-wing AI is vast.
But I also know that this is a weapon which in time will destroy us all by ushering into existence the Zero Trust Society and the Zero Employment Economy.
The former is the more likely outcome. For example, imagine AI image generation that can fool even the experts, and then imagine that tech in the hands of anti-Whites, who get to work using AI to retcon our White past with the addition of nonwhites in our photos, videos, and books. Soon, White people could become conditioned to acccept the false memory of a past America that was always majority nonwhite. A massive psy ops of that nature would effectively quell any pockets of White resistance to their racial overrun.
What AI would unleash is the institutionalization of the inability to discern reality from fantasy. People who cannot reliably know truth from fiction in media and government press releases will suffer extreme mental duress, and many will react to this funhouse mirror world by dropping out and re-grounding themselves into very small kinship circles, at the level of hamlets and rural outposts.
People in general just do not sufficiently grasp how utterly awful a zero trust society will be in practice.
Through the ballot box.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
😂😂 I had you going didn't I?
What does a Zero Trust Society look like?
It looks like Mass Surveillance and biometrics.
Colorado's White population is shrinking, and currently sits at 65% of the state total. The beaner population is exploding.
"Despite consistent increases in net migration, Colorado’s future growth is precarious. Since 2021, the increases in migration to Colorado have almost exclusively come from international migration, individuals migrating from outside of the United States directly to Colorado, rather than domestic migration, movement from other states into Colorado."
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/3aa6968ec7a34ff8b0f172ad6ae6d23e
For a while, there was domestic net migration flow into Colorado, driven by White Millennials, but that appears to have tapered off.
Politically, what is happening in CO is similar to what has happened in CA. Conservative Whites left, and liberal Whites remained behind or moved in. As nonwhites (mostly hispanics) quickly began to electorally and geographically displace the Whites, the latter responded by either leaving or becoming even more rabidly anti-racist.
This is not a surprising reaction, because it reflects an all too common Stockholm Syndrome attitude toward racial displacement:
"If I overtly express my support for the beaners, they will treat me well and the other liberal Whites won't exile me for wrongthink."
If that's what Kavanaugh wrote or implied, then he's basically saying what all of us are thinking: that too much of our national policy is being foisted on the judiciary to decide.
Which is correct, but also highlights the sheer unlikelihood of Congress legislating anything that directly benefits White America. Congress' inability to do its job is not so much the result of institutional inertia as it is the consequence of an upside-down judaized morality that prevents the passing of common sense legislation.
Who is more anti-social? The man driving the oversized pickup truck with the pissing Calvin sticker on it, or the woman screaming at you like a banshee for saying trannies should not be public school teachers?
I see anti-social people everywhere.
Over 40% of food packaged and sold in the US is kosher.
jews are 2% of the US population.
In effect, Whites are paying a jew tax on their grocery purchases that they did not want nor vote for.
Whites are paying the Jewzya.
https://apps.bostonglobe.com/ideas/graphics/2018/11/the-next-bite/the-traditions/
Are the Whites or the niggers winning the World Cup?
I wonder if, at this point, the MAGA red cap does nothing but signal performative spitefulness, and that this perception of neutered rebellion encourages leftoids of either sex but mostly women to make public spectacles of themselves lashing out at MAGA hat wearing White dudes.
If White men were to, instead, brazenly occupy the public square in Hugo Boss SS aesthetics and a happy smile, it would signal intent of purpose, and some of these crazy White women might be more circumspect when confronted by their presence.
"Every woman yearns to submit, but only to he who is worthy of her submission"
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s Place

And to think, when I was in Manhattan Friday, I felt sad at looking at all of those pretty white people, and how I’ll never be apart of their world. Maybe you should think of the ugly people’s feelings.
Come to think of it, NO canoodling looks good when I’m on a dry spell.
canoodling are for pussys … quickly, get what ur going after, finish it off and move one. :]
only time any pda is even worth being viewing is in that one scene in CRANK where the main character does his girlfriend in midday public view.
Is outrage the right word? I’m thinking more of “fright”. Also, if I happen to be eating, I might choke to death on my chili dog, so we’re talking about public safety too. I’m too scared for my life to feel “outrage”.
And to think, when I was in Manhattan Friday, I felt sad at looking at all of those pretty white people, and how I’ll never be apart of their world. Maybe you should think of the ugly people’s feelings.
But wait a minute. I thought your porn collection was plenty. What happened? And besides, any kind of PDA is sickening in my book, whether it involves pretty people or not. It’s just a difference in degree.
It can’t be as bad as watching “2 girls 1 cup” and that is all I’ve got to say about that.
I actually like seeing it. It’s nice to know that it’s not only the beautiful people getting the love.
It can’t be as bad as watching “2 girls 1 cup” and that is all I’ve got to say about that.
Almost certainly faked. It looks like the girls were eating chocolate mousse.
I don’t mind seeing ugly peoples’ public displays of affection, provided it doesn’t violate accepted social norms (you fill in the blank as to what those are). Love is good.
There are circumstances when PDA (between ugly, pretty, in-between people) can be mildly annoying, or amusing, depending on my mood at the time:
There is an element of checking out the public’s reaction to said PDA.
This is common to teenage couples: they think they’re shocking the “old” people, who of course had never made out with someone before.
(Rolling Stones: “I watch the children play / Doing things I used to do / They think are new”).
He, he, personal memory …. I went to my high school prom with a very pretty girl who went to another school…. I remember us suckin’ face during a slow song, and I caught a male guidance councelor / chaperone loking at us with stern disapproval. Dumbass me, I imagined I’m doing somethign he’s never done himself. nevermind that hje was married and projected an alpha personality.
And I also took a degree of satisfaction in beeing seen with a date who was much better looking than many of the more popular guys’ girlfriends. Which leads me to this point:
It’s also common when the partner who is glancing around with self-satisfaction is with someone way out of his/her league.
Faked? Who cares. I was troubled by the contrast between the melodramatic piano and the scat sequences. It was like a soap opera gone terribly wrong or were you too busy looking for unshaved bushes to notice when they were vomiting into each others mouths.
Wait, isn’t it oscar season?
Hey Peter re: your blog, it could also have been titled Peter’s Guns.
You considered this, admit it.
were you too busy looking for unshaved bushes
It’s an arduous and often frustrating task. For every glorious natural pelt I see many, many examples of where the evil razor has cut a loathesome path. But I persevere … I must.
Hey Peter re: your blog, it could also have been titled Peter’s Guns
Now that’s an idea …
ick, that goes double for fat people.
Peter: “It’s an arduous and often frustrating task. For every glorious natural pelt I see many, many examples of where the evil razor has cut a loathesome path.”
I feel the same way about the quest for uncircumsized dicks.
Yes it’s true.
But wait a minute. I thought your porn collection was plenty. What happened?
David was bored with watching porn, so he decided to go out and walk around amongst the normal people, and he was propmtly reminded of why he uses porn. The pretty people want nothing to do with him, and treat him like a peon. Thus, walking amongst the normal pretty people makes him feel sad, thus recreating his need and love for porn.
lisa what do you like about the ‘uncut’?
i’m researching
hypothesis formed.
null hypothesis = there is no difference
The way it feels. No matter how hard it is there’s a little give. This makes no difference during penetration but in the hands that extra give is nice, and it also feels like it’s kissing you back. Cut dicks don’t kiss back.
Peter: “It’s an arduous and often frustrating task. For every glorious natural pelt I see many, many examples of where the evil razor has cut a loathesome path.”
I feel the same way about the quest for uncircumsized dicks.
At least shaved hair grows back. A clipped tallywhacker, of course, is a lifetime deal.
how does it affect the man’s psychology?
i find that it improves quality over quantity
Lisa, it’s nice to see you have your priorities in order when it comes to meeting the right person. Oh, and are you aware uncut guys have mugh higher rates of AIDS?
Being uncut? You mean how does it affect their mental state? This is just me mind you but on some guys (guys from other countries) it’s a non-issue. The majority of uncircumsized guys are from other countries. (see the French movie 9 Songs)
Then Americans fall into 2 categories. Well actually I’ve only had 2 experiences to draw from but they were very different.
One was confident and deliciously passionate (and hispanic). He considered any physical characteristic he had to be one more feature that contributed to the intrinsic value of the whole. Sizewise he was small side of average.
The other was white. Before he took it out, said “Sorry it’s kind of gross. My mom was a hippy.” When I realized what he was talking about I tried to convey my genuine enthusiasm but nothing doing. Neither one of us climaxed the entire weekend. Sizewise he was hung like a dolphin.
Maybe it’s different in the north. But I suspect that for at least southern white men there is a whiff of race or class status involved with the distaste for being uncut. For women it’s probably aesthetics or unfamiliarity.
What do you mean it improves quality over quantity?
See? I can’t make this shit up. Where are you from Pitbull?
i have this bizarro theory that many men don’t settle down until their desire for quantity transforms to their desire for quality. this happens later in life, usually also coinciding with decreasing testosterone.
uncut men have greater sensitivity, and are overall more sensitive lovers. ( TMI! ) Maybe women should take trips to south america, not just guys like roosh.
but i have a very small sample size, so this could be totally invalid. or maybe it just has to do with the personality of men i tend to attract.
pitbull- go read a study. por favor. gracias.
Wow I like that theory. Irina you are very smirt.
uncut men have greater sensitivity, and are overall more sensitive lovers. or maybe it just has to do with the personality of men i tend to attract.
I think it has more to do with the man’s personality, and not the sensitivity of his member. Also, I don’t completely believe the notion that men “settle down” later in life and change their ways. My father has never been fully faithful to any single woman, and he’s in his 50s.
Maybe women should take trips to south america, not just guys like roosh.
I have no problem with people from South America, but the cut vs. uncut thing is really rather silly. Also, the majority of American men are great. The minority of men that are scumbags do not represent the whole of American men.
Also, I half-suspect that the men that subscribe to quantity over quality probably haven’t met any quality women that want to commit to them. Once they do, in my observation (in person; not of men on this blog), they don’t go crazy trying to get more women. I know many examples of men who are loyal to their families.
I think Americans need companionship more because they are in a society that is less socially cohesive. Before they “settle down” they tend to sleep around more to get that companionship, and most people know how to get casual sex. Some people just don’t think that a long-term relationship is worth fighting for or worth having. Again, a matter of personality rather than testosterone…
LOL! This blog is hilarious. I have it bookmarked. I was having a really bad day and decided to come in and read and re-read some stuff. Roissy, I think you’re one of those people who just wants to see if you can get people to agree with the outrageous crap you say and when I see the Betas/followers on your board believing you and hanging on your every word (because face it, only a beta would take this seriously), I always imagine you’re sitting back somewhere having a beer, laughing your ass off.
This is too much. LOL!
hope- yeah. i agree on companionship thing, it’s so hard to find. women outsource it casual sex as well nowadays. but i can’t really say it’s just american men. young russian guys always had at least one warm, feminine woman to come home to at night, and many still went out to play. it really just depends on the guy.
warning, boys, this blog has just turned into grey area and girl talk! who wants to discuss nail polish?
What’s your favorite Carrie Bradshaw outfit?
Hey the people demand something new to read!