The latest Fake Stat currently rubbing shitlib clits raw is this [very special study] purporting to prove that hate crimes are far more prevalent than are hate hoaxes:
Here go shitlibs again, with their inverted logic (a hate hoax means hate crimes are real!) playing fast and loose with data they comprehend just enough to obfuscate and twist into misleading headlines, hoping to pull a fast one on a short attention span public who still thinks the $PLC isn’t an anti-White hate organization.
A Sailer commenter called out this bullshit and tiresome leftoid tactic,
Just like that, the latest NYT “factoid” joins the “10% of Americans are gay” and “1 in 4 women are raped” and the rest of the BS everyone believes because they “read it somewhere.”
The online hoax lists show hundreds of examples.
And many–if not most–of the “real” ones are fakes.
The category error is definitional. There are reported hate crimes which were never investigated, there are investigated but unsolved hate crime reports, and there are proven and prosecuted hate crimes. “Hate crimes in the US (2016-2018): 21,000” doesn’t tell us much. 21,000 hate crimes could mean 21,000 reported hate crime hoaxes that were never disproven by a full police investigation. And it could mean 21,000 black-on-white hate crimes.
I’ll crib from International Jew, who came up with an apt analogy for this tedious data-sodomizing legerdemain by shitlibs,
When it comes to alleged hate crimes, the interesting question is: what percent of the thoroughly investigated ones were real?
You’d get a high “real” percent for UFOs to, if you compared total alleged sightings to the number that were investigated and debunked.
Maybe I’m slightly biased by my politics in this, but right now I can think of more hate hoaxes than I can recall real hate crimes.
Going down the shabbos hole to the source of the Fake Stat above, we find something very…predictable.
Brian Levin, the director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University in San Bernardino, who has been tracking staged and real hate crimes, counted 49 fake reports between 2016 and 2018. In the same time, Levin told Quartz, there were about 21,000 hate crimes. That makes the percentage of falsely reported attacks 0.2% of all hate crimes. (The FBI received 13,000 hate crime reports in 2016 and 2017, according to its latest data.)
While Levin concedes that his data collection methodology has limitations—he and his team rely on media reports—it is indicative of how rare it is for a hate crime to be made up.
A [special person] consulted an industry run by [special people] for tautological “evidence” that would support a [special narrative].
“It was in the media, so it must be true!”
Good lord, what a load of libfuckery.
More on Brian Levin,
The one-man-band behind the garbage called “research” in that article is Brian Levin.
You can find plenty about him online. Here is an example:
https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/michelle-malkin/how-manufacture-anti-muslim-hate-crime-epidemic
Andy Ngo has more: https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/hate-crime-hoaxes-reflect-americas-sickness/
This Levin character sounds like someone who really has a stick up his ass about Christian America.
One more great comment, from Almost Missouri:
Mikel Jollett’s “hate crime” numbers are really Annalisa Merelli’s numbers, which are really Brian Levin’s numbers, which are basically meaningless tautologies invented by Brian for the purpose of perpetuating his career.
OTOH, Merelli does write that “The FBI received 13,000 hate crime reports in 2016 and 2017”, which is true, in the sense that over two years the FBI received about that number of “reports”. But it turns out the FBI stats aren’t much better than SPLC alum Levin’s fake numbers.
The FBI—or other DoJ arm—could just total up the number of hate crime convictions in a year and have a pretty robust, verifiable and traceable number. But they don’t do this. Instead they total up “reports”, which are not convictions. They are just reports: someone (example: Jussie Smollett) told a law enforcement officer that a hate crime happened, and someone at the law enforcement agency (and by law that person has to be a designated “expert” on “hate crimes”, giving said “expert” a vested interest in justifying their “expertise” with large numbers of reports) passes a few general specs about the allegation on to the FBI, who tally it up for the big report. If the allegation is never confirmed, or if it turns out to be false, does the FBI subtract the number back out? Maybe, maybe not. Apparently certainly not if it takes into the next reporting period to establish the falsehood of the allegation, since the FBI does not issue revised statistics.
Then there is the fact that the definitions of “hate crime” are extremely loose. The perp, if they even have one, does not need to be charged with a hate crime for it to count as a “hate crime” for the FBI’s statistical purposes. For example, if the alleged victim is a member of the NAACP, the allegation is automatically a “hate crime” if the “hate crime” “expert” so designates it.
Unsurprisingly , the definitions and examples in the official docs are written to maximize culpability of whites. In spite of this, whites still manage to under-perform compared to their share of the population. No prizes for guessing which race most over-performs compared to their share of the population, despite the fact that this category of crime was tailor made to boost their victimhood and camouflage their criminality.
Finally, there seems to be no way to trace the FBI’s Hate Crime statistics back to the actual events that underlie them short of submitting thousands of FOIA requests per year, which still may not suffice. So there is no objective, independent way to verify the FBI’s “Hate Crime” stats.
tl;dr
Despite the existence of actual, verifiable numbers of hate crime convictions existing, the FBI/DoJ ignores that in favor of an opaque, unverifiable, easily distorted process that maximizes “hate crime” claims with no connection to actual convictions. Lazy and dishonest journalists such as Jollett and Merelli bandy these fake stats about with gay abandon. Thus does the public-private partnership Fake News Juggernaut roll on.
Steve Sailer — a better man than Mikel Jollett or Brian Levin could ever hope to be — ran the real numbers and came up with a more accurate ratio of real hate crimes to hate hoax crimes.
Hoaxes as elaborate as the Empire TV star’s are rare, but it’s hardly uncommon for, say, the perpetrator to turn out to be nonwhite, or the act, such as posting a flyer mentioning “It’s okay to be white,” to be not (yet, at least) a crime, or for the motives to be murkier than you’d imagine from reading Southern Poverty Law Center fund-raising junk mail.
[…]
But what percentage of these press allegations have since been validated?
The methodological issue is, how do we keep advocates from memory-holing contrary data?
My solution is to use The New York Times’ own “This Week in Hate” columns. I let the pinnacle of Establishment respectability take their best shot, curating their own list of hate crimes from across the country. I then evaluate how The New York Times did.
[…]
For the purposes of this essay, I analyzed all 21 incidents in the second (12/6/16) and third (12/13/16) weeks of “This Week in Hate,” looking for pro and con evidence that has accumulated in the 26 months since on the validity of the NYT’s accounts. (I skipped the first week, assuming it was better to let the NYT get into its stride. I encourage other researchers to check out the rest of “This Week in Hate,” which finally petered out in July 2017.)
How many of the 21 incidents have resulted in hate-crime convictions? How many have been shown to be a complete hoax? How many are unconfirmed by the justice system but seem plausible? How many unconfirmed occurrences are dubious?
[…]
As I count them, of the 21 incidents carefully curated by the NYTto demonstrate that white Trumpists are waging a war of hate on the true Americans:
Two are more or less proven.
Five are unproven but more likely than not.
Seven are unproven and more unlikely than not.
And seven are disproven.
So, the nation’s Newspaper of Record got at least an average of one out of three of its “This Week in Hate” stories right. On the other hand, the facts in another one out of three cases undermine the NYT’s Narrative.
For the Times to be right on merely a simple majority (11 of 21) of its handpicked stories of white Trump criminality, four of the seven unlikely incidents would have to turn out to be true.
Therefore, the Times probably failed to reach even 50 percent accuracy.
Brutal debunking. FATALITY
Andy Ngo likewise concludes that there is an epidemic of (mostly anti-White blood libeling) hate hoaxes:
PS There’s no such thing as “hate speech”. There is only free speech. And there is no such thing as “hate crime”. There is crime. We shouldn’t prosecute thoughts. We should prosecute actions. End the “hate crime” farce now.
The PS nails it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
so wait most hate crimes are hoaxes?
you mean white people aren’t shooting up black neighborhoods?!?!? DF?
LikeLiked by 1 person
In reading about these continuing travesties against White culture, if you’re not gunning up and ammoing up and steeling yourself for the inevitable civil war II against us YT’s, you’re absolutely stupid.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Steve Sailer’s one-man operation constitutes the entire investigative journalism of the right. Everyone else “on our side” is an opinionator derivative from his original content (or, one degree further removed, an aggregator of opinions!), and opinions are like assholes.
Who else do we have pounding the pavement? Chuck Ross? Byron York? Kind of.
Sailer needs to be duplicated like Trump if we are going to avoid war.
LikeLike
Mr. King:
…if we are going to avoid war.
The Right’s problem: It did not go to war when Whites were 90% of the population and there whole country was not honeycombed with so many compact enemy masses. (To say nothing of how culture and traditions still had some vestiges—plus a hundred other little bonuses.)
If your goal is to avoid war, don’t worry: The Right excels at that, and excels at losing that way. And no, nothing has changed on that point in the past 154 years. What I fear is that we may get not the positive chance of war—which would require leadership, discipline, and decisiveness—but instead, the disintegration of anarchy. (See “compact enemy masses” for how that will go, when it’s every man for himself.) Meanwhile, the Trump narcotic keeps people anesthetized with the promise of an easy, peaceful solution to problems that were systematically irreparable a half-century ago.
investigative journalism
Much though I myself appreciate it, informing and educating The People with facts does not work. Never did, never will—not as long as human nature persists at stubbornly being what it is in reality—all liberal protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.
LikeLike
“the positive chance for war”
We can win using the strategy envisioned by Harold Covington in his novels. Stop pussyfooting around the issue with hoity toity nebulosity.
LikeLike
The Right’s problem: It did not go to war when Whites were 90% of the population and there whole country was not honeycombed with so many compact enemy masses.
Whites can be 5% of a population of NAMs and still dominate it. What percent of the world’s population is jewish? Zero-point-fucking-two. So let’s not get all Captain-Obvious panty-knotted about demographic quantity over quality. While “quantity has a quality all its own,” the power equilibrium between r-selection and K- is hundreds, if not thousands, to one.
If your goal is to avoid war, don’t worry: The Right excels at that, and excels at losing that way.
Nonsense. How would you characterize “conservative” warmongering over the last twenty years? Their goal is the opposite of “to avoid war.”
Yes, of course my goal is to stave off open conflict! And a corollary to that goal is to stop neconnish bluster about how glorious and useful mass violence in our streets would be. Not to mention the completely random results revolution produces, often “eat[ing] its own,” and achieving a still worse situation.
In any event, only by pursuing all other means of resolution short of war will convince the mass of white normies to concede to the inevitable. Everything else is “screw your optics,” counterproductive LARPing.
Meanwhile, the Trump narcotic keeps people anesthetized with the promise of an easy, peaceful solution to problems that were systematically irreparable a half-century ago.
The complete opposite is the case. Trump is a stimulant alerting both us and them that we have one shot to conclude this Cold Civil War peaceably, and he is it. His actions are not “anesthetizing” but rather the last good faith effort to work within the system. You excitable types who think we are perpetually 48-hours from Mad Max are not reliable observers of political reality.
Much though I myself appreciate it, informing and educating The People with facts does not work. Never did, never will—not as long as human nature persists at stubbornly being what it is in reality—all liberal protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.
You are reading liberalism into what I said and making a straw man. At no point would I ever say that “educating the people” was an alternative to violence. My country was born in revolutionary violence and achieved by the Talented Fifth, the men with not just testicular fortitude but also wisdom, discipline, and deep historical knowledge. Is it worthwhile educating their counterparts of today? Hell yes, and that’s why I am here. Even if it’s down to a Talented Thousandth.
LikeLike
And if ever you are tempted to substitute ratios for ratiocination, remember that whites constitute 9% of the world’s population.
Nine.
LikeLike
Another canard that you probably have already contemplated… “Illegals commit crimes at levels less than American citizens.” Popular argument that conveniently fails to ID US problem of apocalyptic african/mezo crime rates
LikeLiked by 1 person
Repeat a lie enough and it becomes the truth they say.
The problem is a weak mind doesn’t have a skeptical edge. When you believe lies, Satan wins.
P.S. Homos always have this weird dead look in their eyes and purse their lips a certain way. A permanent Duper’s Delight phyz going on. Aroused by the act of sinning more than they are aroused by men I am lead to believe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
>>>>> “There’s no such thing as “hate speech”. There is only free speech.”
Free Speech IS Hate Speech.
Truth IS Anti-Semitism.
LikeLike
I didn’t read past cal state San Bernardino. Probably parallel in prestige with Chico state, i guess it better than citing a professor at a community college. But just barely. This is the “university” single moms go to get their credentials. Fuck em.
LikeLiked by 2 people
+1 on last paragraph:
http://davekopel.org/CJ/IP/Hate-Crimes.htm
LikeLike
I am paraphrasing but Lawrence Auster coined a concept that the ultimate expression of hate is murder, and if you judge hate crimes by that standard it is inescapable who hates whom more. I would say the same thing for all crime including assault, rape, theft, and and even fare jumping.
LikeLiked by 2 people
>>>>> “if you judge hate crimes by that standard it is inescapable who hates whom more”
Well, there is no famine.
— (((Meir Henoch Wallach-Finkelstein)))
https://www.garethjones.org/st_patricks/~litvinov_famine_denial2-old.htm
LikeLike
There’s also no such thing as “good race relations”, other than if the races stay in separate areas. In other words, segregated.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No connection at all, no sir. Side note: The Catholic Church is done.
– Vatican summit organizer: Gay subculture in seminaries has ‘nothing to do with sex abuse of minors’ –
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-summit-organizer-gay-subculture-in-seminaries-has-nothing-to-do-wit
LikeLike
LikeLike
Even in this commercial, it’s noticeable that one character is goofy, sneaky and deferrential to another one who is self assured, powerful, yet merciful and kind. Guess which one is which (before even watching the commercial)? Things are pretty transparent nowadays…
LikeLiked by 3 people
is he asking him where the meth is?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jesus Christo, I didn’t know this ad existed. And I thought I’d seen it (((all))).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fellow white looks special in this commercial! Very special indeed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
WTF is the matter with you posting softcore faggotry and extending the reach of jew shock-propaganda? You are literally a tool, importing their poison into this refuge from their influence for creepy personal reasons. We can’t scroll past your (((graphic content))) fast enough.
You have desensitized yourself, and so nihilism follows. You are a vector of weakness infecting strong white men, thinking your capitulation to the jewmind belongs among us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have to second King’s observation… we didn’t need to see that ad, and the way some of you clowns keep giving legs to the Sanhedrin’s agitprop, after innumerable times being rebuked for it, is just another page in the ever-growing tome This Is Why We Lose.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
No way, it’s done?
Gosh, who could think such a thing!??!
Nobody could have seen this coming, truly a bolt from the blue!
LikeLike
Nice piece debunking the rising hate crime narrative: https://bongino.com/the-truth-about-rising-hate-crimes/
LikeLike
If there ever were a real problem with straight white males committing “hate crimes”, almost every leftist minority in this country would be wiped into extinction.
LikeLiked by 4 people
LikeLike
When they outlaw hate speech white people will skip straight to the hate violence. Which is what most of the other tribes do. Similar note it is funny how far they are pushing the anti antisemitism card, just pointing out that someone unloved by history was a joo is being called out as antisemitism. It’s gotta start tweaking normies at this level.
LikeLiked by 6 people
Cohen had to mention numerous times in his testimony in front of Congress that his father was a survivor. I assume it was a sympathy ploy.
LikeLiked by 6 people
” I assume it was a sympathy ploy. ”
I have to disagree. I think it was a ” friendly ” reminder that they are dealing with one of the tribe.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Priestly-Caste, no less.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are officially more survivors from death camps than actually entered them.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Hello: my name is Judas Ben Cohen remember the 6 gotillion amd what we did to Christ!
LikeLike
white people are currently self-exterminating
In RSA are they rising up even when the blacks are threatening genocide?
Good thing we have APEX GENES in the Nordics!
LikeLike
Okay, I’m really confused now.
I had thought that this was Black D!ldoes -> Second Tier Adventist.
But now I’m not so sure.
LikeLike
Who’s we nig?
LikeLike
there’s much more than 50 hate hoaxes. much more!!!
just that jewish kid that did bomb threats he call out to like dozens of companies
LikeLike
Meet your modern selfie mom
https://people.com/crime/miami-mom-5-year-old-son-dead-jumped-off-high-rise-balcony-identified/
LikeLike
Now see how it is done: In Russia, for Men’s day, to celebrate the holiday, women traditionally give gifts to men.
Here you can see a russian woman congratulating men for the holiday.
LikeLike
The holiday is officially called ‘Defender of the Fatherland Day’. Officially, as the name suggests, the holiday celebrates people who are serving or were serving the Russian Armed Forces (both men and women, both military and civilian personnel), but unofficially, nationally it has also come to include the celebration of men as a whole, and to act as a counterpart of International Women’s Day on March 8.
To celebrate the holiday, in Russia women traditionally give gifts to the opposite sex, especially husbands (or boyfriends, fiances), fathers, sons and brothers, but also to their male co-workers. It is celebrated on 23 February.
LikeLike
My Russian ex used to get up early and make me Russian pancakes for breakfast and pelini soup with a side of Olivia salad for dinner on men’s day.
One year her mom was visiting during that holiday and they went all out. Even invited her girlfriends over and their boyfriends and basically served us a ridiculously large spread.
LikeLike
Even invited her girlfriends over and their boyfriends and basically served us a ridiculously large spread.
And the food wasn’t half bad, neither. 😉
LikeLike
All this hate crime and nary a love crime?
Except we do have love crime. It’s called “That 9-year-old came on to ME!” And, well, we taught the kid 5 years prior to explore her s3xuality, so surely it was consensual.
LikeLike
Has anyone else noticed… that when the Negro shot and killed five white people in Chicago at the very same time the Smollett hoax was underway, the (((media))) reported it as a “another mass shooting” rather than as an anti-white “hate crime”?
LikeLike
Has anyone else noticed… how VA Gobner Northam was outed as a k1ansman a day after he leaked their intentions to murd3r l!ve human ch!ldren?
LikeLike
Micro aggressions don’t exist
Climate change has been occurring since before man
Settled science doesn’t exist
Rape culture doesn’t exist
Anti-fascists are fascists
Chopping off your penis doesn’t change the chromosomes in any of the the trillions of cells in your body
Diversity means homogenous bean or black
Double plus ungood
Any others?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Top-Ranked NCAA Women’s Runner Competed as Man Last Year freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3731093/posts
LikeLike
And ugly as the devil!
LikeLike
“Settled science doesn’t exist.”
Never has; never will.
LikeLike
BLM was a movement based on a Hate Hoax.
Michael Brown deserved to be shot.
There was no justification for basing a protest movement around Darren Wilson’s calculation to save his own life as the gorilla attacked.
LikeLike
Media often cites that “the SPLC has compiled a database of the rising tide (or sometimes referred to as “thousands”) of hate crimes that have occurred since Trump’s election”. Of course this alleged database is not made public so there is no way to check its veracity. Useful for filler text in autogenerated liberal webzine essays as well as SPLC funding drives.
LikeLike