Feed on
Posts
Comments

Woman Successfully Sues Dating Agency Over ‘Lack Of Men’

Tereza Burki was awarded $23,000 in damages for ‘deceit’ and ‘distress’.

A woman seeking a wealthy boyfriend has won £3,100 ($A23,000) in damages after an elite dating agency failed to introduce her to “possibly the man of my dreams, the father of my child”.

The High Court ruled Tereza Burki, a businesswoman living in London, was misled and deceived by dating agency Seventy Thirty about it’s “exclusive” membership, the Guardianreports.

The 47-year-old mother of three approached the dating service in 2013 in pursuit of a new partner, however, Judge Richard Parkes noted, her requirements were “not modest”.

She wanted a “sophisticated gentleman”, ideally working in finance and leading a “wealthy lifestyle”. He must also be “open to travelling internationally”. Plus, most importantly, he must be willing to have more children (she’s always wanted four).

As is usually the case with these tragic tales of bitterbitch lament, a much…clearer…understanding of the transactional dynamics motivating the complainant’s accusation is had with a glance at the glowing gal’s photo:

Three questions come to mind:

Have aging single mommies always been this delusional?

If not, what changed in the aging single mommy extended universe to lead them marching straight into the abyss of self-delusion?

If so, what culture constraints in the past helped to keep a lid on aging single mommy delusion?

Naturally, this being Clown World, she won her lawsuit.

***

williamk comments,

Those who seek status but can’t attain it through the settled order of Nature must seek to negotiate their status through whatever is its perceived arbiter. Their resulting character is a function then of the culture and who doles out status. Some cultures will produce nuns, others will give Guardian bylines and court payouts to delusional hags. Is it six of one, half dozen of the other? Not from my vantage point.

***

key keys in on the core conceit,

always wants the one kid with new sucker to lock in sprog support

busted timeline of xer retarded plan led to this legal tantrum

Gives new meaning to the term ‘anchor baby’.

109 Responses to “Aging Single Mom Sues Dating Service Over ‘Lack Of Interested Men’”

  1. Titus says:

    If, and that’s a massive if, she were able to get inseminated, that kid would have a five head the size of a surfboard. Jesus, they regard themselves so highly that they’re willing to dump a medical encyclopedia’s worth of chromosomal abnormalities onto a kid just to convince themselves they are not sexually obsolescent.

    I hate clown world.

    Liked by 8 people

  2. racerxx says:

    wow this certainly is Clown World.
    all she needs is a football jersey to complete the look.
    what a catch.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Cracker says:

      yep, football jersey lol

      or the standard uniform of north face/columbia jacket with track pants, leggings, or mom jeans

      Like

    • Macro Investor says:

      Look how fat her face/chin, tits and arms are. I’m sure a full length photo would show a huge belly, ass and thighs.

      In clown world, every sea beast DESERVES a handsome billionaire. No need to give him anything, because weez entitled.

      Like

  3. xyz says:

    What if a 30-something single man singed up for a dating/matchmaking service and had a ridiculous set of requirements like:

    – must be a virgin
    – must cook, clean, and do household chores
    – must be slim
    – must not be a feminist, etc.

    Unless the matchmaking service were for Mormons, of course he wouldn’t be able to find a woman in the United States or any other Western nation who met those requirements.

    If he were to sue for not finding the perfect wife, the jury would never side with him. But since a single mom hag sued for not finding the perfect gentleman, the jury gave her money she didn’t deserve. We do indeed live in Clown World.

    Liked by 1 person

    • traitors first says:

      What if a 30-something single man

      What if a 20 year old single man ……. he still wouldn’t be able to find a virgin cook unless he went to the amish and even then it probably wouldn’t be legal.

      the jury gave her money she didn’t deserve. We do indeed live in Clown World.

      Welcome to the party pal 🙂

      Like

    • markgm28 says:

      I doubt a dating service would tell such a man that they would be able to find him such a woman. They would probably react to that set of requirements in a way similar to how the feminist dating coach reacts to Borat’s requirements that include “plow experience” (look up Borat dating service)
      If the dating service guaranteed this woman that they’d get her such an ideal man and then failed to fulfill the contract, then she has the right to sue. She was delusional to have such requirements, but they were stupid to indulge her by agreeing.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. […] Aging Single Mom Sues Dating Service Over ‘Lack Of Interested Men’ […]

    Like

  5. Diversity Is Good says:

    New N Tytle Mint! Not just a breath freshener! More than a mouthwash! It’s a way of life!

    Like

  6. mendo says:

    As the saying goes: wow, just wow

    Like

  7. Chase says:

    Patriarchy: the radical idea that middle-aged men will make better decisions and be better stewards for the future of our culture than 18-year-old girls. We have totally lost the plot.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Pup says:

    How long before women can directly sue the men that don’t find them attractive? Not joking…this being clown world and all…

    Liked by 2 people

  9. 7darktriad3 says:

    The most pathetic aspect of this story is that I believe she paid £50k+ to this agency, as they had promised her the pick of London’s billionaires, and fully believed the pick of London’s billionaires would be clammering to date a 46yo frump. One of her requirements for a spouse was that he owned multiple international homes.

    You couldn’t make it up.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Nads says:

      … date a 46yo frump, a 46yo frump with three yungins in tow.

      Tough choice for a wealthy brit: Her, or someone who looks her 25 years ago.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Scanman says:

        I’ve seen the naked bodies of women in their 40’s. Maybe 2 in 100 Western women can keep it together at that age, and that’s no exaggeration. Saggy tits, flabby asses, loose skin.

        *blech*

        It’s over for good for 98% of them at that age. And there is nothing unnatural or wrong about that.

        In non-clown world, most would have a place of honor and respect as loyal wives and wise and loving mothers of young adults about to start having their own families. In clown world they’re spending hundreds of thousands on cosmetic surgery and diet plans and gym/spa memberships and fashionable clothes and cosmetics and dating services to try to land that white beta bucks whale. That billionaire bad boy with six pack abs that Cosmo tells them is out there searching for them right this minute.

        Tragicomedy.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Scanman says:

      “One of her requirements for a spouse was that he owned multiple international homes.”

      Hahahaha

      This shit is endlessly entertaining, though. You have to admit that. Billionaire? Holy shite! In all honesty, how many HVAC repairmen would give that woman a second look in the grocery store? Seriously.

      Perhaps this judgement will force matchmaking services to start dealing out a little realism to their deluded female clientele…?

      Hahahahaha nope. Of course not. Stoking the fantasy pays lots more.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Alfa158 says:

        Does British TV have the Hallmark Channel available? Sounds like she has been watching a ton of that.
        In her defense, the company took her money instead of laughing uproariously and sending her off with a pat on the head, so I maybe they are liable. After all if a conman tricks you out of money, he can’t use the defense at his trial that you just shouldn’t have been stupid enough to have fallen for it.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Roy says:

        A female 4 demanding a male 10. Clownworld indeed.

        Like

  10. Nads says:

    Thanks for not showing a full body photo. Or a beach shot.

    Sadly, she was probably a looker 25 years ago.

    My money is on she dumped her babies’ daddy so she could ‘explore her sexuality.’

    Liked by 1 person

  11. williamk says:

    Those who seek status but can’t attain it through the settled order of Nature must seek to negotiate their status through whatever is its perceived arbiter. Their resulting character is a function then of the culture and who doles out status. Some cultures will produce nuns, others will give Guardian bylines and court payouts to delusional hags. Is it six of one, half dozen of the other? Not from my vantage point.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hitler is our pal says:

      “Those who seek status but can’t attain it through the settled order of Nature”

      You’ve just summed up the entire civil rights movement.

      [CH: he really did. and as always, nature will have the last world-shaking laugh.]

      Liked by 3 people

    • eggplantzzz says:

      That should be in quotes mister

      Like

    • Libertardian says:

      Great comment especially because it covers both sides: when said culture makes said decisions wisely, you get things like heritage America, 19th-century Britain, the Han dynasty, etc. Now, well…

      Like

  12. Damn Crackers says:

    “If so, what culture constraints in the past helped to keep a lid on aging single mommy delusion?”

    Nunneries

    Liked by 5 people

  13. Hermes says:

    Totally anecdotal, but I feel like I’m seeing a strange emerging trend in online profiles for local dating services (Bumble, OKCupid, Toronto). I recently reactivated them, and if my memory serves, two years ago on Tinder, the “basic” girl (trips to Thailand, party dress pic, bikini pic, group pic) profile said they just wanted tacos. A year later, they just wanted to “be friends with your dog” (jokes on them, the only dog owners in the city are gay dudes), and on it went.

    Since then Bumble has superceded Tinder for women. They go on Tinder and must feel invisible, disqualified, uninterested, as it is a meat market, pure and simple. The ones I saw on there a few months ago are the ones you saw on OKC in small numbers 5 years ago – buzzcut belugas and high pants hookers. Then they overran everything. Tinder became a nascent “like” service. My roommate has always had it, and he only uses it to get matched. He ignored the matches. He just does it to affirm he can get somebody to like him still. Likely most people on their are in the same boat (seeing as millenials are sexless as a generation).

    Now the “serious” daters are on Bumble. And OKC might be reaching a reverse trend too. Multiple girls on their I have seen mentioning “partners, traditional family values, multiple dates”. On OKC, I’m seeing women that list themselves as conservative, centrist, or distancing themselves from feminism.

    This made think of a recent post of yours, that men and women identify their political polarity closer to the sex group in power. I think women online are feeling the drought. Men as a rule are more conservative, men online dating and in the city are as a rule, highly left, and therefore extremely unnactractive. So a bunch of male feminists are posting dog pics and soy smiles trying to get laid or they’re a faceless set of abs and women are wondering if they’re even real. Where have all the good men gone? Maybe the cottage. That’s where I’ve been going lately.

    Like

    • guest says:

      Bumble is now full of Bluetropolis post epiphany phase women, single mothers, ever increasing vibrancy, and a few young Instagram whores.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        That recent Book Club movie about sex- and septagenarian women, all relatively hot stars of yesteryear, featured a blowsy Candance Bergen becoming a Bumble-whore.

        Like

  14. The Judge says:

    Lol 47
    She should be welcoming her first grandchild. Instead she’s riding the carousel.

    Like

  15. FastEddie says:

    lol
    I actually like this story. It reminds me that no matter how bad I think I have it here, things are 1000x worse in GB. Ah, how the great empires have fallen.

    Glad you’re all my clown world bros.
    FE

    Like

  16. The Judge says:

    I dont get these middle aged ugly white rich women. Just find some nignog, and ask him to get his band of nignogs to run a train on her. She only has s few years left, so who cares if she spends it riddled with STDs from all that niggler juice. Give up. Its over.

    Like

  17. Chakrates says:

    Mr. Chakrates just straight up called her a delusional whore.

    He’s succinct like that.

    Like

  18. key says:

    always wants the one kid with new sucker to lock in sprog support

    busted timeline of xer retarded plan led to this legal tantrum

    Like

  19. Space Viking says:

    That service should sue her for damaging their brand with her hideous, haggard, decrepit visage.

    Like

  20. tteclod says:

    THIS IS THE MOST GALLING

    “The 47-year-old mother of three approached the dating service in 2013 in pursuit of a new partner, however, Judge Richard Parkes noted, her requirements were “not modest”.

    “She wanted a “sophisticated gentleman”, ideally working in finance and leading a “wealthy lifestyle”. He must also be “open to travelling internationally”. Plus, most importantly, he must be willing to have more children (she’s always wanted four).”

    What sane man, rich, successful, and desiring children of his own, will select for his wife a 47-year-old woman with three children from (a) previous relationship(s)?

    As CH states, only in clown world does the judge hearing this case award the woman monetary compensation for her specious claim in lieu of a caning and a week in the stocks, where, perhaps, her hopes for another child may be granted by a desperate hobo lacking cash for a younger prostitute.

    Liked by 2 people

    • She’s delusional but I’m sure the dating service catered to her delusions to get the sale. If someone said they could get me the perfect partner for 15k and didn’t come through on their end of the deal, I’d sue them too. Ok, I’m a cynical bastard and wouldn’t trust them in the first place.

      Liked by 1 person

      • tteclod says:

        What’s funny to me at my late age is that my standards have fallen to the point where my criteria to replace my wife would be:
        1. Caucasian
        2. Under age 31
        3. Fertile

        After decades of marriage, I’m convinced that the intangibles can be corrected.

        Like

      • Libertardian says:

        Reminds me of the old middle school joke with the punchline “Ain’t you a bit old to be believing in leprechauns?”

        Like

  21. Opus says:

    Not entirely correct.

    The law has been settled since 1892 and it is the first piece of case law that English Law Students learn (Carbolic Smoke Ball Co case) the difference between spin and a term of a contract. In this case the Judge ruled that because the agency had said they were inundated with top men (when they only had half-a-dozen) that was a term and not just advertising. Of course the bitch is still crazily deluded.

    Liked by 2 people

    • pelayo1683 says:

      Yeah, she’s delusional. But I really don’t mind she won. What’s best for society? For other men and women around her to tell her to shut the hell up, wake up, look in the mirror, stop dreaming, hunker down and raise her kids right. Of course, all this would happen in Sane World and we are living in Clown World.

      This agency didn’t do her any good. Nor society. It’s not doing anyone any good, so I don’t mind one bit that they lost money. They preyed on her delusions, and yes, maybe even sold her a false bill of goods. For all we know she may have asked for their opinion and they fleeced her anyway.

      Burn it all.

      Liked by 2 people

  22. Lovekraft says:

    I hope heartiste posts on Madonna (Maria Cicconne, from Joisey for the uninitiated) at the MTV awards. She was channeling her inner Omar Sharif.

    Talk about witchcraft on a global stage. Other than flaming homos and a certain subculture that must not be named, who actually does she appeal to? I’ve never understood her popularity, unless it’s tied into another group of shameless self-promoters.

    https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/08/21/madonna-slammed-for-aretha-franklin-tribute-mtv-vma/

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Sigh… I remember when the Madonna/Whore complex meant two different broads.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Carlos Danger says:

      Madonna is from Detroit. My college roommate used to date her younger sister.

      Like

      • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

        Yes, I thought she was from Detroit.

        She has been pushing satánism for a while now. She is probably one of the higher priestesses, along with Katy Perry and Hilldog.

        Do devil worshippers burn in hell or does Satan give them a pass?

        Like

  23. arminius says:

    I don’t think she’s bad for 47. But 47 is not what she needs to be for the market she’s trying to play in. Jennifer Aniston might be able to get away with that, she’s 49, but she has the best gym trainers and surgeons in the world apparently, and all the recognition of her name.

    If the website were a dance club, this problem would have been taken care of by the guy at the door who would have turned the woman away. Look for the website to implement the digital equivalent of a guy at the front door in the future (as well as cleaning up its over-promising tag line).

    Like

    • arminius says:

      Eh, never mind. I just saw an article on Alyson Hannigan and she’s 44 and looks spectacular. I just don’t have what makes a decent looking mid-40s woman is supposed to look like. And before you jump my shit for choice of example, yes I (((know.))) It’s just an article I ran across.

      Like

    • Cool Shoes says:

      Don’t forget, once women hit menopause and their female hormones start drying up, then they take on an odd musty smell. Sort of like dead leaves is how I would describe it.

      Like

  24. DH says:

    Delusional indeed. But in perspective cut her some slack. She popped 3 kids up

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Greg Eliot says:

    Sure she’s delusional, but the point everyone seems to be missing is the agency (any names on the owners?), instead of operating in good faith and dissuading her of her hare-brainedness, took her money and told her she was good to go…

    If I’m reading the math right, she only got back about half of what she paid… nice work, if (((you))) can get it.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Odysseus says:

    Without knowing what promises the agency made to her, it’s hard to know what their legal liability would be.

    But for this woman to think she would get so much as a glance from a London billionaire/millionaire, and to bet 50,000 pounds on that (which is what, about 100k US?) is just delusional.

    Like

  27. Greg Eliot says:

    Sure she’s delusional, but the point everyone seems to be missing is the ågency (any names on the owners?), instead of operating in good faith and dissuading her of her håre-bråinedness, took her money and told her she was good to go…

    If I’m reading the math right, she only got back about half of what she paid… nice work, if (((you))) can get it.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Captain Obvious says:

      1488. 110.

      Like

    • Esteban Hazard says:

      Names are in the original article, I believe she recouped most of it but lost 5 grand in another suit against the company (alleging fraud). After all, the company fed into her delusion and took her money.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Oleaginous Outrager says:

      Less than half: “However, Seventy Thirty also counter-claimed for defamation and was awarded £5000 over a Google review Ms Burki left in April 2016, in which she accused the company of being non-reputable and fraudulent. The court found the company was not running a fundamentally dishonest or fraudulent operation.”

      As usual, the court is talking out of both sides of it’s mouth (and getting both sets of lawyers paid over this bullshit).

      Liked by 1 person

  28. dickycone says:

    I think Zuckerberg marrying a hard 5 did a lot to perpetuate this kind of delusional thinking.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. Anonymous White Male says:

    So, a pound is worth over 7 dollars these days?

    Like

  30. Igor says:

    I never cease to be amazed at the number of women who reach middle age without a basic knowledge of human reproduction. She thought she was going to have more kids at 47? This is even more delusional then her belief that wealthy guys working in finance are eager to snatch up a middle aged single mom.

    Liked by 1 person

    • >>>>> “I never cease to be amazed at the number of women who reach middle age without a basic knowledge of human reproduction.”

      Guess (((who))) controls biology edumakashun throughout The West?

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        In fairness to these chicks, no one ever told me anything about how quickly a ch!ldless woman’s ferti1ity falls off the edge of the cliff in her early 30s.

        I only started learning that sh!znat about 12 or 15 years ago, when I started reading about demographics.

        [CH: amazingly, nature has provided men with a near-perfect female fertility gauge: men’s eyes. a wrinkled, flabby old bat’s face most certainly does NOT say “i am ready to birth your champions”.]

        Liked by 1 person

      • Igor says:

        Yeah, I put this sort of info in the “sky is blue, water is wet” category. It should be common knowledge even in the absence of a formal human reproduction course. I’ve known women with multiple advanced Ivy League degrees express genuine surprise that they failed to get pregnant in their late 30s/40s. Women’s inability to grasp such a basic concept is an indication of some sort of mental defect innate to their sex, not a lack of education.

        Like

      • pelayo1683 says:

        Young and nubile equals fertile.

        Like

      • Roy says:

        If I’ve been able to teach my daughters amything it’s this: Fertility window is limited. If you want kids don’t wait till you’re 30 to find a man. You’ll live to be 90 and have PLENTY of time for a shitty job in a cubicle if that;s what you want. And stay-at-home moms are the happiest women of all women.

        Those are things they’ll never learn from other women in professional positions of power. Or society. Or the (((media))).

        Teach your children well.

        Like

    • pelayo1683 says:

      With two Boomer medical professionals for parents, I didn’t get a single word of biological real-talk about female fertility until I was 25. Twenty. Five. And then, of all creatures, some frumpy, old Canadian lady I met with while backpacking through Cambodia informs me that peak fertility hits girls at age 17. I was practically in shock. More in shock over having never been told this. The actual facts of the matter, well, weren’t so shocking. It made sense.

      Like

  31. jabowery says:

    “sophisticated” means he’s been gaslit by clown world sophistry to the point that he’s convinced he’s got no better options.

    Liked by 2 people

  32. Cloudswrest says:

    “Plus, most importantly, he must be willing to have more children (she’s always wanted four).”

    ————————

    There is in fact a potential breeding opportunity here. Now hear me out! Given that she is 47, the odds of her conceiving naturally are pretty slim. This means she’s going to need fresh exogenous eggs, i.e., NOT HERS. This leaves open the possibility of siring spawn with some prime eggs. She’s just a vessel.

    There was some discussion recently on Jim’s blog that women have not evolved any psychological defenses against literal biological cuckolding, as it is evolutionarily novel. They view any child they give birth to as theirs. So for any rich dude who can afford prime eggs, from women otherwise out of his reach, here is your opportunity!

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Jay in DC says:

    I jump on Tinder every now and then just for shits & grins. It is definitely heading downhill in a big way. It is similar to what Hermes stated above. As Clown World grows the ‘list of demands’ gets longer and the attractiveness of those demanding gets lower. Also those insane 35—> women speaking as if they are 20 and have all the time in the world is exceptionally common now.

    The current market is insanity incarnate. First of all, they are VERY fucking hostile. Fully half of the profiles I flicked through are just angsty, angry, demanding, and entitled. Who the fuck wants to be around that for even a nano-second? I will tell you who. Thirsty ass beta herbs. And they are LEGION. This is why allows this shitshow to continue.

    Then you have the fact that we are down to about 1 in 10 or 1 in 20 women with a normal BMI. That reflects the thing we talk about on college campuses too which is even more distressing. Because at 18-21 you are the BEST you are ever going to be, its all downhill from there. If you are a hambeast then? Yikes…

    The West is fucking miserable in almost every aspect. Maybe in the in between places it is still somewhat normal but based on my own experience and talking to the peeps I know in other urban areas, its shyte pretty much across the board. Pozzed Gynarcho-Tyranny is our system of government and life in general.

    [CH: for the reasons you and hermes give (and which i’ve written about before), i abandoned online dating a long time ago. i saw the writing on the wall. face to face, eyeball to eyeball, is the only way a man can break through the entitled bitch field now. and yes the poz has gone national. all the big blue shitlib cities are the same — same shitlibbery, same slogans, same bumerp stickers and window signs, same restaurants, same local papers written in the same style, same craft breweries and gin distilleries, same nightclubs, same bars, same uber drivers, and same entitled battlecunt shrikes. about ten or fifteen years ago, a blueprint was set for how to gentrify cities, and it took off like wildfire through every shitlibopolis.]

    Liked by 2 people

    • Oswald Spengler says:

      Bring on The Second American Civil War…the sooner, the better.

      Like

    • pelayo1683 says:

      Hostile indeed. I was shamed by one TinderWitch as ‘selfish’ for the sane, primeval, and perfectly human desire to WANT MY OWN CHILDREN. This, on date number 2.

      In ten minutes on the interwebz I found out you could possibly cure her condition through natural means, fasting, diet changes, etc. Had she tried it, after suffering from it for nigh 17 years of her life? No. Did she even KNOW there were natural remedies and treatements for it, that can lead to a cure? No. Clearly couldn’t be bothered. To do a web search for ten minutes. Instead, just shame evil, selfish menz.

      Next.

      Liked by 2 people

    • pelayo1683 says:

      “all the big blue shitlib cities are the same — same shitlibbery, same slogans, same bumerp stickers and window signs, same restaurants, same local papers written in the same style, same craft breweries and gin distilleries, same nightclubs, same bars….”

      You could say the same for Suburbia, America, not just the big blue shitlib cities.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Scanman says:

        Aside from the natural landscape, some of which is truly gorgeous, America is one drab, ugly, strip mall covered fucking mess.

        Economic America is a vast fucking eyesore.

        Where there is no vision, the people perish…

        Liked by 2 people

      • Esteban Hazard says:

        Suburbs are really made for families to lock their children away for the day.

        Like

      • Roy says:

        I call it McAmerica. It’s bland, monotonous, and you can’t tell if you’re in Bloomington, San Jose, Allentown, or Baton Rouge (except by the number of nogs present but even that measure doesn’t work as all urban areas are now nog central).

        Like

    • Scanman says:

      I signed up for Tinder about a week ago just to see what all the fuss was about. In a word — weird. Just fucking weird and at times horrifying.

      Got a nine matches the first day, only one turned into an actual meet up which went nowhere.

      I think it’s a magnet for shit tier women who can’t be bothered to put in even a minimal effort to genuinely interact with another human being.

      If you are in a blueshitlibopolis, plan on swiping left A LOT. Holy lord…

      Anyway… don’t waste your time, gents. Even if you’re a model-caliber looking man (I’m not), I can’t imagine meeting a quality human being on that thing.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

        There oughtn’t be any need for Tindér.

        Girlz who are slim, put effort into appearance, and are pleasant and flirt a tiny bit should have no shortage of men approaching them as suitors/gentlemen callers.

        But no, they get fat, dumpy, frumpy, mouthy, sassy. They’d do well to kick off the sneakers and put on some heels more often.

        Granted, men need to get off the video games and learn how to talk to womyn, but that’s another poast.

        Liked by 2 people

      • mmaier2112 says:

        Nearly all the Tinder broads I saw were fat and tattooed and talking about how “my baby is my life!”

        No thanks, Tinder Whores.

        I think I’m just going back to uni for a degree, learning guitar and trolling for campus trim in person.

        Like

    • PA says:

      Say, you’rea 17 year old high school senior. You have a cute, slim girlfriend from a good home.

      It’s said that women best cash in their commitment chips at a v. young age because they are at peak beauty.

      But reading what I read about the sexual market… young men are now at peak access to decent-looking girls with good personality.

      It’s a bad-odds gamble, isn’t it, for a teenage boy today to NOT put the bun in the oven and ring on the finger now?

      Liked by 1 person

      • pelayo1683 says:

        17 year old girls shouldn’t be within earshot of 17 year old boys. They should be busy with tasks in the home, in some girls-only classes, and then be being presented by their betters to 20-25 year old young men at formal social events.

        17 year old boys should be being told to not worry one whit about those 17 year old girls, they’re too old for them, they’ll be old and haggard before they know it, to keep working and studying, keep their heads down, become a man, and then get one of their own when they’re 22-23.

        Liked by 1 person

      • PA says:

        I’m separating the ideal from here-and-now.

        If 17-18 is the point shy of which girls become sexually used up, then a boy ought to get one before that happens.

        Does a 23 year old man have access to high school girls?

        It seems to me that, caveats aside, he has to choose: start a family NOW with undamaged goods or enter the tinder-toilet market.

        Like

    • Southern WASP says:

      Tinder may not work for everybody, but I’ve had some good success with it. In my profile I have two pics – the first one I’m wearing a suit, the second one I’m hiking in the mountains. A lot of women go for the “sophisticated but rugged too” angle. In the bio, all I have is my height and city I live in. I don’t pay attention to the women’s bios. A lot of them will say things like “swipe left if you voted for Trump” or “looking for long term relationship only” but I think they probably put that up in case their friends see their profile and they don’t really mean it. I’ve banged several “I’m with her / long term relationship only” types from that app on the first date.

      Like

  34. Major7 says:

    After reading about Psychocunt and the shit (((she))) pulled, and that any man stayed, let alone a bunch of them, I’m kinda surprised that this fat old ballbusting single mommy hag didn’t get suitable offers.

    Like

  35. Anonymous says:

    She “won”, but the beautiful hatefact is she would pay 10x her winnings for a man she actually liked to text her back.

    Like

  36. Tam the Bam says:

    Classic metropolitan (Knightsbridge/Chelsea) eurotrash.
    Dutch ‘national’ with a curiously Czech name.
    Illuminating series of entrepreneurial activities, recently wound up.

    GENTLEMEN FOR HIRE LTD 26 January 2016 – 28 February 2017
    Previous company names
    GENT FOR HIRE LTD 11 Feb 2016 – 23 Feb 2016
    DATE A GENT LTD 26 Jan 2016 – 11 Feb 2016

    The mature drinker’s verdict? Gold-digging Eastern Euro retired whore who pimped/madamed gigolos for the SW1 set on the side.
    Can’t be brassick if she owns that flat in Lennox Gardens (basically a million/one-a-half million-plus per bedroom), but still somehow lusts after a sugar-granddaddy. And another babby, at 47. Forty-freakin-seven. Too much powdering of the tip-tilted nose there, I fear.

    Like

  37. Tam the Bam says:

    Also forgot (damn you, Mr James Beam!) she’s going after a (former?) rival in the man-pimping industry, a direct competitor.
    Over to Opus on this one, it’s too sophisticated for me to decipher.

    Like

  38. frank632 says:

    If I’m a 40 something year old billionaire and I’m single, do you think I’m going to be looking for an age appropriate woman? Hell no. If I’m 47 and rich, she’d have to be at least 20 years younger than me i.e. at least 27, perhaps even younger than that. The only way I’d be with a same aged woman is if we were together since we both were younger. But if I’m single and looking, a same aged woman wouldn’t even be on my radar.

    She looks like she would have been very attractive 20-30 years ago. From 1988-2000 she probably was a legit Stacy.

    But now, she’s in no position to make those kind of demands and what older women don’t realize, at least consciously, is that even if they met their ideal man. Tall, good looking (even adjusting for age), rich, good in bed, drives a luxury or foreign car, owns lots of property etc, he’s going to be looking for a much younger woman and they’ll likely be able to get a much younger woman. That’s why women try to shame and brow beat men into dating “age appropriately”, even going so far as to calling men pedophiles for preferring younger women.

    She had her chance but she should have been on it at least 20 years ago, ideally sooner than that. Hell, she’d have had a better shot 10 years ago.

    Liked by 2 people

  39. Robert What? says:

    Yikes. She’s not even a good candidate for Pump ‘n Dump.

    Like

  40. Veritas says:

    Aging, Short, Overweight, Balding, Underemployed Single Dad (with No Game) Sues Dating Service Over ‘Lack Of Interested Women’

    There, fixed it! 😘

    [CH: fixed what? your simmering butthurt?
    ps i know a single dad who does very well with much younger ladies. seems the sprog baggage doesn’t hurt men’s chances like it hurts women’s chances! Nature!]

    Like

    • Veritas says:

      No, I agree with you about the dad’s, I was just trying to imitate the article’s title to show the irony if the sexes were reversed.. no one in the broader society would care for a single dad’s dating prospects, and that I was trying to, hyperbolically, draw attention to.

      Like

  41. Anonymous says:

    Gotta love the UK a delusional hag got pounds for being washed up.

    Like

  42. pyrrhus says:

    L3100 is not $23,000…more like $4,500

    Like

    • Tam the Bam says:

      Alles ganz korrekt! You couldn’t even buy a ten year old (i.e. daffy-ducked) hi-roof Transit or Sprinter for that. A none-too-subtle pimphand backhander from the Bench there. Could M’Lord be a displeased ex-client?
      It’s the price of a Fat Slags’ fortnight trip to Magaluf, con bouzo.
      “Eeeh Sand, these ‘ere foreign monkeys don’t ‘alf give it laldie up the harris! But they will buy yer some o’them tempoorer prorns. Wiv sauce! Gi’z that sangria ovver ‘ere!”

      Like

    • guest says:

      They meant to write 13,100.

      Like

  43. Truth-hammer says:

    Yeesh! ‘That’s a man, baby.’– Austin Danger Powers.

    Like

  44. BrachaBenedicta says:

    There was once a joke-ad printed in an Eastern European magazine from the seventies.

    “Poor, sick, 80 year old lady looking for young, rich, handsome 25 year old. I can dream, can’t I?”

    I guess 21st century Western civ has finally caught up with late 70s Eastern European humor.

    Like

Leave a Reply