Feed on
Posts
Comments

Shitlibs more strongly identify along ideological axes. This is why, for instance, they can’t tolerate the company of those with differing world views. (White libchicks are the absolute worst at tolerating those with opposing political views.)

And, although I don’t have confirmatory data at hand, I suspect shitlibs are more likely to wander and become itinerants, always looking for a shiny new city to infest. Personality studies have found that shitlibs tend to be more novelty-seeking, or to put it less charitably they tend to have higher disgust thresholds. This desire for novelty and filth probably contributes to the shitlib “born to run away” compulsion. They just can’t handle too much niceness (read: Whiteness), order, and comfortable functionality. They need to feel distressed. They crave chaos in their lives.

How do I know this? Well, I have been surrounded by shitlibs. I’ve swum in the deepest waters of their subterranean cultures, taking what I wanted from them while leaving behind that which repulsed me. I know them pretty well, tbh, how they tick and what emotional keys are tickled in their hamsterchords.

I bring this up on the heels of the recent exposure of Stephanie Wilkinson, the proprietoress of the Commie Shrew, excuse me, the Red Hen, who hounded Sarah Sanders out of her restaurant and followed her like a psycho down the street screaming libanities at her, as a shitlib vagabond.

The rootlessness of shitlibs is intimately connected to their ideological fence-guarding in a positively reinforcing feedback loop. The shitlib leaves for a strange new locale, loses touch with everyone before her, and finds new friends at work, bar crawls, or expediently through shared housing.

Each move in the shitlib’s life brings more severing of social connections and greater stress finding and stringing together replacement social connections. (Family connections are surrendered for good.) There’s very little organic or authentic thread tying together the nomadic shitlib with her new sets of friends…no common upbringing, no schooling experiences, no history or unique local culture, and most importantly no shared memories which is the most powerful bonding agent.

Into this toxic atomization the one binding agent strong enough to overcome the disintegration of traditional social and family bonds is ideology. A fevered, frantic, hysterical attachment to ideology becomes the substitute for natural bonds, and the shitlib leans on ideological identification — in herself and in those who would be unwittingly auditioning for inclusion in her social circle — to screen for friends who will meet the lowest standard in friendship: someone who won’t irritate her with an opposing viewpoint.

This is why shitlib friendships (and similarly, romantic relationships) in the big blue cities are typically superficial, transient, and transactional: the only common ground is hatred of [X] and how one votes. When ideology is the foundation of friendship, those mystic unspoken bonds of reassuring familiarity get twisted into a grotesque facsimile of affinity, one based on an overweening insistence of ideological compatibility and purity. With nothing else to connect them to each other, the shitlib relies on ideology to shoulder the burden of standing in for the missing authenticity.

And ideology can work, for a while, as a values substitute and proxy for relationship complementarity, to create and maintain relationships (which is why city chicks will stress “shared values” and “Trump voters swipe left” when pole shopping), but woe to the friend who steps out of line one day and utters a deplorable bit of crimethink through the bottom of a cocktail glass. When ideology is the glue, a trivial difference of opinion on a point of order can feel like a gross betrayal.

The problem is a long-run one. Besides the lapses into crimethink, shitlib relationships dissolve easily and perfunctorily with work relocations and life stage changes that demand more social involvement and commitments than simply ideological conformism. The shitlib is bothered by these demands because they throw into stark relief the inauthentic nature of her friendships.

What is evident to the meanly keen observer is that shitlib friendships start to take on the veneer of artifice, fraying at the edges and duct-taped by snark and late nite talk show references. The very fact that shitlibs strive so hard for social authenticity prevents them from ever realizing their goal. They are their own worst frenemies. It’s a variation on the old “if you have try to be cool, you aren’t” aphorism.

De-urbanization and a revitalization of towns and smaller-sized cities geographically dispersed more equitably throughout the country will go a ways to helping shitlibs form real, lasting friendships that can survive the occasional disagreement with a Colbert monologue.

Related:

28 Responses to “Rootlessness And Ideological Identification”

  1. mendo says:

    This desire for novelty and filth probably contributes to the shitlib “born to run away” compulsion. They just can’t handle too much niceness (read: Whiteness), order, and comfortable functionality. They need to feel distressed. They crave chaos in their lives.

    It’s an odd mutation of Munchausen by proxy syndrome.

    But rather than distressed, it is as though they seek such conditions to become the person to “solve” the distress, well, more like “virtue signal about a solution.”

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      mendo, the other factor at work here is that the White stock of the USA was strongly genetically selected for religious DISSENTERS, so the underlying religious/gnostic/charismatic impulse is very powerful in almost all USA Whites.

      But once the Frankfurt School succeeded in gutting Chr!stianity in The West, this White USA compulsion for some connection with The Divine needed to be satisfied somehow, and of course the Frankfurt School was ready & willing to divert that compulsion away from The Divine, and over to mere ideology [which is The Obscene].

      My guess is that a yuuggge portion of all sh!tlib Wh!te virtue snivelling is an attempt to try to fill up that great big empty black hole in their souls with anything which will make them feel just a little bit better about the utter meaningless & purposelessness of their existences.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “an odd mutation of Munchausen by proxy syndrome”

        As though it were a vicious circle – a devilishly baleful feedback loop – in which the piously devout sh!tlibs are fighting tooth & nail with one another to see how much more self-contradictory & self-destructive they can make their virtue snivelling.

        Like

    • Steve Canyon says:

      If they can’t seek it out, their nonsense creates it. Eventually the place deteriorates into a third world hellhole too unsafe for them to inhabit. Or they can’t afford the muggings. So they move and start over the process.

      Like

  2. […] Rootlessness And Ideological Identification […]

    Like

  3. Captain Obvious says:

    Two obvious thoughts come to mind:

    1) Did the Frankfurt School realize, a priori, that the goyim had not been bred [over the millennia] for a life of rootless cosmopolitanism, and that the goyim psyche would quickly collapse under the weight of it? Or, once this became an obvious feature of modrenity, was it just another pleasant surprise for the Frankfurt School?

    2) My guess is that, if you study the Total Fert!lity Rates, then you’ll find that the White sh!tlib rootless cosmopolitans are rapidly unbreeding themselves out of existence.

    For instance, when I did those searches on Stephanie Wilkinson, I don’t recall seeing any strong evidence of her having b!rthed any pr0geny.

    [CH: good questions that no mainstream media outlet will touch. and that is why they are losing]

    Like

    • XLoveli Deeper Seksi --> purpleboxx.wordpress.com says:

      CH’s addendum makes me wonder:

      Does frankness and willingness to confront the truth ALWAYS make one stronger??

      Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      “Each move in the shitlib’s life brings more severing of social connections and greater stress finding and stringing together replacement social connections.”

      Likely also contributes to failed marriages and fewer l!ve b!rths. Marriages tend to be stronger if the potential hvsband and w!fe have already been familiar with each other for a few years, as opposed to only a few months. This is harder to achieve in a sh!tlibopolis, or even a university town.

      Like

    • Oleaginous Outrager says:

      There was a pic that was purportedly of her with her husband and son (all in pussy hats).

      “Wilkinson is married and has two kids. Her husband is a philosophy professor, according to Wilkinson’s bio. According to his Facebook page, he worked at the Virginia Military Institute and studied at the University of Virginia and Oxford.”

      [CH: any man who unironically wears a pussy hat should donate his balls to a gator. they are of no use to him.]

      Like

    • Oleaginous Outrager says:

      What the fuck happened there?

      Like

    • oink says:

      L’Autre Chienne sends her regards, Maitre

      Like

  4. XLoveli Deeper Seksi --> purpleboxx.wordpress.com says:

    Yes, that would be a good approximation of the shitlib lifestyle and mindset, such that it is.

    I would like to add 3 points, though:

    One, shitlib ideological “friendships” can be deep through a sense of being under similar pressure, the way a diamond is forged through deep pressures.

    Two, shitlibs flock together for the reassuring scenery of their own features. Virtue signaling becomes a joyful sight. The lack of it is like plucking a peacock of his feathers.

    And most important, three, the way to defeat the shitlib is to kick the ideological base out from under them, stool-like: make them snarl at each other and start nitpicking over ideological “purity” — the way the Bernie Sanders branch has contempt and hatred for their neoliberals for being too corporatist and insufficiently down-to-earth. Make them eat ttheir young. Make them pay.

    X.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Saucery, your problem is that, in the 21st Century, ideology is the White sh!tlib’s RELIGION.

      So you’re dealing with people who are undergoing a charismatic experience via their ideology, and who are very likely prepared to fight to the d3ath in order to perpetuate the psychological ecstasy of it.

      What we can do is peel away more & more of the sane White DEMs, like that potat0 n!gger Joe Crowley, who just got his a$$ handed to him on a platter by some d@mned diarrh3a-skinned semi-literate puerto-rican h0.

      In this day & age, the potat0 n!ggers have gotta grow the phuck up and realize that we’re all in this together.

      Like

      • XLoveli Deeper Seksi --> purpleboxx.wordpress.com says:

        *nods and smiles at Saucery remark*

        Yes, but it’s easier said than done. As you say, they have a vested commitment to their “feelz.” Feelz can be a powerful tonic in a rootless age where atomization is the norm and social feces become playthings for the pattycake kidz of the New Left.

        Like

  5. Chase says:

    “Trump voters swipe left” is about the funniest thing I see on profiles, outside of “Not here for a hookup” (it’s Tinder, thot). They desperately want someone like a Trunp supporter, secretly. Everything is insane, and watching Donald Trump heighten every damn contradiction is the most fun I’ve ever had outside of a vagina.

    Like

  6. Unreconstructed Fenian says:

    One of my favorite quotes is by President Jefferson Davis. He said, “Our enemies are a tradition-less,rootless race. From the time of Cromwell to the present moment they have been disturbers of the peace”. Is it any wonder that the term “carpetbagger” still rings true today?

    Like

  7. clarence boddiker says:

    as the token conservative in my deep blue globohomo circle of friends, my role was the one you could confess thought crimes to.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. seldom seen says:

    a random comment i found on a youtube video. just thought it was too hilarious to pass:

    For the people in the comments who think it comes down too whats between your legs: Its more complicated than that. Women have penises too, the clitoris. Its a micro penis without a urinary track ( mostly ) but the problem is some women might even have a urinary track running in their clit, so then its actually a penis, and they might still have a vagina and a functioning uterus. Just like gender is fluid, sex is also fluid. Boys and girls are genetically the same, boys have genetics for a vagina, and girls have genetics for a nice pair of balls. Mostly it doesnt happen because of hormonal reasons ( Thats the only genetic difference ) but the blue print is in both girls and boys. There is no meaning to “man” and “woman” we should ban those terms. What we are is humans, some have a vagina, some have a dick, and some have both. Thats what is comes down too, the rest is a fabrication. Instead of “Are you a women” we should ask “Are you a vagina type” ? Because it really asks for the essence of the question, rather than asking for a sterotype. It should only be asked for sexual reasons, or technical reasons ( I might be attracted to this person, or I want to know how many urinals I should install as a boss for example )

    Like

  9. Libertardian says:

    Someone on MPC linked this yesterday. Slate called it for once.

    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/06/did-justice-anthony-kennedy-just-signal-his-retirement.html

    Like

  10. Deadlocked says:

    You’re suggesting that “De-urbanization and a revitalization of towns and smaller-sized cities geographically dispersed more equitably throughout the country” will make liberals form more lasting friendships. There are two problems with that:

    1. Cities strongly benefit from network effects (just like Facebook or Google). One of their main appeals is that there are so many people in one place – it increases your options when it comes to jobs, buying/selling, romance, etc. Smaller, more dispersed cities just won’t be as attractive.

    2. Even if that happens, smaller cities may be more attractive to liberal types than where they grew up. You don’t just have to de-urbanize – you’d have to forcefully limit individual freedom of movement. How would you do that?

    Like

    • oink says:

      If push comes to shove, a few atomic bombings will serve pour encourager les autres think about the thoughtlessness of megalopolis living.

      Like

  11. thordaddy says:

    “Radical autonomy” is the general phenomenon…

    Each new locale necessitates a novel self-creation only to be destroyed upon arrival at the newest destination. This continuous r/evolution is the perpetuating self-annihilation of the modern shitlib.

    Like

  12. Nothingman00 says:

    No white man or black man or brown man was ever meant to live stacked up in towers. Gooks, or at least certain strains of them, seem to be fairly well adapted to the termite mound megalopolis habitat, but for the rest of the planet that is a soul crushing environment.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      J00z also evolved to be rootless cosmopolitans, and they’re at least as ancient as the g00ks.

      Like

  13. Big ETres says:

    Wow, this blog EXACTLY describes my Texas-born-and-raised brother’s journey from Texas to living in Vermont and now Maine, adopting lib friends and ideologies along the way, and denouncing (and blaming) his family and Texas roots for his personal failures – his failures as a man.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion