Dread Game is the CH term for mindfucking girls into loving you deeper, harder, longer. In so many words. The concept is simple: when a girl thinks you, as a man, have romantic options, and you are able to indirectly (sometimes directly) communicate your high SMV and attendant options to her, she’ll work harder to keep you pleased.
In short, women value men who are valued.
(In tautologies, there are great truths. Women appraise the mate value of a man in large part by proxy; that is, how attractive he is to other women, particularly to other attractive women.)
Over the years, SCIENCE has galloped side by side with Game, confirming over and over and over again the field observations of Game-wielding men.
Add another lovestudy to the mix of scientific evidence giving weight to Game principles: Insecure people tend to behave more morally. (scroll down to #9 in the list)
Insecurity is generally thought of as a drawback, but it is not entirely bad. People who feel insecure about whether they have some positive trait tend to try to prove that they do have it.
Hamster strife, happy wife.
Those who are unsure of their generosity, for example, are more likely to donate money to a good cause.
“Women who are unsure of their attractiveness or lovability, for example, are more likely to donate morning blowjobs to a manipulative jerkboy.”
This behavior can be elicited experimentally by giving subjects negative feedback—for instance, “According to our tests, you are less helpful and cooperative than average.” People dislike hearing such judgments and end up feeding the donation box.
Dread for life, happy wife.
(if you haven’t noticed, I love messing around with that pussy pedestal aphorism “happy wife, happy life”.)
Drazen Prelec, a psychologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, explains such findings with his theory of self-signaling: what a particular action says about me is often more important than the action’s actual objective. More than a few people have stuck with a diet because they did not want to appear weak-willed. Conversely, it has been empirically established that those who are sure that they are generous, intelligent or sociable make less effort to prove it. Too much self-assurance makes people complacent and increases the chasm between the self that they imagine and the self that is real. Therefore, those who think they know themselves well are particularly apt to know themselves less well than they think.
Read: Too much betaboy appeasement and supplication and approval seeking makes a woman complacently self-assured and increases the chasm between her vagina and his penis.
As a reader wrote, “put her in the defensive crouch and she’ll be a better partner to you.” That’s Dread Game, now autistically validated by the labcoats. If your girl thinks that by your uxorious behavior she owns you, heart and soul, she’ll put in less effort to prove she’s worth your love. And by “less effort”, I mean less sex, in fewer positions, for shorter durations, accompanied by fake moans and missing pussy squirts.
So if you want a happy, loving relationship with a sexy babe, make her insecure about something that matters to her. Hit her with a neg or two like a daily multivitamin, and watch in wonder as she works hard to prove she can not only excite your love, but keep it too.
***
#1 in that link’s list of ten psychological biases neatly explains the leftoid mentality.
1. Your perspective on yourself is distorted.
Your “self” lies before you like an open book. Just peer inside and read: who you are, your likes and dislikes, your hopes and fears; they are all there, ready to be understood. This notion is popular but is probably completely false! Psychological research shows that we do not have privileged access to who we are. When we try to assess ourselves accurately, we are really poking around in a fog. […]
The way we view ourselves is distorted, but we do not realize it. As a result, our self-image has surprisingly little to do with our actions. For example, we may be absolutely convinced that we are empathetic and generous but still walk right past a homeless person on a cold day.
The reason for this distorted view is quite simple, according to Pronin. Because we do not want to be stingy, arrogant or self-righteous, we assume that we are not any of those things. As evidence, she points to our divergent views of ourselves and others. We have no trouble recognizing how prejudiced or unfair our office colleague acts toward another person. But we do not consider that we could behave in much the same way: because we intend to be morally good, it never occurs to us that we, too, might be prejudiced.
This is another way to describe psychological projection, a cognitive affliction to which liberals are famously susceptible. We not only conceive ourselves in unearned glowing terms, we too easily see in others the faults and vices that we ourselves possess.
Leftoids are known to be less charitable than conservatives, but more sanctimonious about their self-perceived charitable impulses than are conservatives. In the undrained swamp that is the shitlib mind, status accrues through moral preening (virtue signaling), so shitlibs, objectively less charitable, generous, and tolerant than conservatives, are nonetheless — because of their trade in virtue and lifestyle status rather than financial or achievement status — MORE interested in propping up a righteous self-image which results in a BIGGER DISCONNECT between the misanthropic liberal action and the inflated liberal ego than would be evident in the typical conservative.
This action-ego disconnect is also known by the term COGNITIVE DISSONANCE, and it’s why gated community liberals, limousine liberals, trust fund hipster liberals, 1%er liberals, credentialist suckup liberals, SJW liberals, and striver SWPL liberals (aka GoodWhites) have a pathological compulsion to slander conservatives and flyover bumpkins (aka BadWhites) with the vices and bad traits that liberals themselves copiously evince.
It also harmoniously explains why Challahwood — the world’s leading cesspit of depravity and narcissistic malevolence — has spent decades pumping out bilge that subverts normal Gentile values and lifestyles. Bravely “exposing” and undermining the bucolic normie way of life allows these agitprop scumbags to project their own degeneracy onto those whose simple good-hearted existence is a reminder that the merchants of malice aren’t the paragons of saintliness they imagine themselves.
http://mondoweiss.net/2018/05/republican-coalition-emerges/
LikeLike
Trump dread gamed the tribe?
http://mondoweiss.net/2018/05/republican-coalition-emerges/
LikeLike
Actually, Trump played the field…he didn’t let mere rapport signal commitment…competition…more like the role of Preselection…Dread is used when your partner is supposed to be committed.
LikeLike
I don’t get Roseanne. Isn’t she Jewish?
LikeLike
She’s a strange girl – if you read her Wiki, she’s got a long, long history of bedding Shkotzim and having mischling babies with them.
LikeLike
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roseanne_Barr#Personal_life
LikeLike
From JewornotJew: http://www.jewornotjew.com/index.jsp :
Roseanne Barr
Jew Score: 9
November 3, 1952 —
Can Jews be trailer trash? Apparently so.
So even though she was born Jewish, it’s very hard to imagine Roseanne sitting down for Passover Seder, her head covered with a scarf, sipping on Manischewitz. No, it’s much easier to picture her in a middle of a trailer, popping open a TV dinner, slurping Pabst Blue Ribbon.
It gets even more complicated. Yes, her family was Jewish, but somehow, it was involved in Mormonism as well. Then she became both a kaballist and a follower of Jesus Christ. Now she is back to reclaiming her Jewish heritage.
And we are fine with that. If Roseanne wants to return to being Jewish, that’s fine. Just make sure to stock up on TV dinners when she visits.
Verdict: Borderline Jew.
LikeLike
LOL’ed @ (((Blank Slate-ist))) trying to fool the goyim into believing that “j00” is a cultural rather than a genetic phenomenon.
Epic fail.
LikeLike
On Rosanne, commies crying “there’s a red line that can’t be crossed, not protected by the first amendment.”
Lolzoz first, no there is not, other than causing imminent violence with words. That’s the point.
Second, these fags say that line is crossed by pointing out the obvious truth that blacks resemble characters from planet of the apes?
The left seeks to stamp out all truth that hurts feelings.
LikeLike
https://m.huffingtonpost.co.za/2018/01/15/comparing-black-people-to-monkeys-has-a-long-dark-simian-history_a_23333383/
LikeLike
There’s that word again – “dark.” As in “democracy dies in darkness” (WaPo).
I swear at one of the breakout sessions at Davos or Bilderberg they decided that all their enemies would be labelled “dark”.
Makes sense considering they are illuminists.
LikeLike
Ever see Huff-Post’s editorial staff? No men, not even a homo, all White chicks, the only diversity being an Asian chick of one hue or another of yellow. Now WTF would THEY know about race? Seriously. Race is something the White women of Feminism, Inc. uses to batter White men. It was their power. IS their power. Except here and there, little ‘chinks’ in the Feminist armor, no pun intended. They noticed at the Pussy March that it was all Ashley Judd’s White girlfriends running the show. So Blacks, a Muslim woman and a tranny had to be included on the Big Stage when THEY started grousing.
White women are Feminism, Inc. It was only they that benefited. Sexist, Racist, Misogynist is their battle cry against White men. I root for that whole hierarchy to be smashed by the Muslims, by Hispanic and Black women. From Academia to the DNC, all White women, and Asian women don’t count. Donna Brazile was the janitor at DNC, but she is afraid of those White women when Seth Rich-types started turning up dead all over DC in 16. And there’s Hillary, still standing, not locked up. Bernie Sanders is running in 2020, already making the rounds, trial balloons. We ain’t won nuttin’ yet.
LikeLike
Jews are eating their own lately. Even Larry Davis noticed. If HE can notice, Super Jew that HE is, so can I. All these prominent Jews that are getting destroyed lately, every one of them leaves broken goy lives in their wake from women to business partners. Even Adam Sandler stiffed the restaurants of Essex, Ma. when he filmed Grownups. Salem, Ma. was smarter, he had to post BIG bonds with the town before they granted permits to shoot Grownups II. That’s merely ONE example. Winkler, David, the SATC folks, chiseled the other three of the four NYC sluts.
LikeLike
https://ferris.edu/HTMLS/news/jimcrow/letters/2012/apes.htm
Lolzoz
LikeLike
https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/deep-problem-deep-learning/
LikeLike
Its all about status boys. Your value – Her value = Swallow Value
Will she swallow or spit you out? Never give a shit if she spits.
You can play a con where you get an accomplice, but that’s too tricky.
Get her friends on your side and you’re Golden.
Unless she’s the Queen Bee, her little committee can OUTVOTE HER.
Even Alphas should think twice about Queens.
The others can ALWAYS BE OUTVOTED by her friends.
If you want to be her lover, you gotta get most of her friends.
If you don’t, then you’re in trouble. That trouble NEVER ENDS.
LikeLike
The friends exception is if you play Sneaky Fucker Game.
LikeLike
My inlaws gave me a little “happy life happy wife” placard and it sat on the mantle for a short period. Several months ago (after reading this blog for a while) I told the wife to throw it in the garbage because it was beta bullshit. She did.
Dread game is the truth. The annoying thing is you have to keep applying it or it wears off. It would be nice if a woman just appreciated you for being a good father and husband and rewarded you with sex and blowjobs on-demand every day until you die but it just seems like they are constantly programmed to test you. Like driving a car with bad alignment on the interstate if you take your hand off the steering wheel for a second you immediately veer into the rumble strips.
I’ve been with the same woman for the better part of a decade and we have sex every day or two and she will frequently initiate it but it doesn’t happen without game on a daily basis. Some dread here, a couple negs there, calling out her shit tests, etc. And as an experiment if I’m nice to her and agreeable all of a sudden 3,4,5 days go by with no sex. Then I step up the jerk attitude and she wakes me up in the middle of the night to suck my dick.
It’s fucking obnoxious.
LikeLiked by 4 people
“It would be nice if a woman just appreciated you for being a good father and husband and rewarded you”
As I was trying to tell Wild Man the other day, women can’t understand your strengths – they only understand your WEAKNESSES.
LikeLiked by 2 people
CH: “Women appraise the mate value of a man in large part by proxy; that is, how attractive he is to other women, particularly to other attractive women.”
Wild Man was positing some ludicrously deductivistic nonsense about women keying in on men’s male value relative to other men [on some hypothetical social ladder climbing of masculinity].
Which, in addition to being so much narratival horsesh!t & nonsense, also made the fatal error of trying to shove square pegs into round holes: Never anthropomorphize women and pretend that they’re human when in fact they’re animals.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Different types of woman too though some aren’t batshit all the time
LikeLike
It ain’t enough, Obvious, it almost never is. Once cash and prizes are factored in and the bitch decides to cash out, nothing else matters. The entire culture bends them into divorce and YOLO. Eat, Pray, Love indeed.
LikeLike
And the entire culture reinforces the idea that the way for men to be attractive to women is to treat them like equals. And that if the spark is going out a guy just needs to do more chores and talk about his feelings and rub her feet and shit.
I’m skeptical cash and prizes would convince a woman to leave a man she was afraid of losing to another woman.
I’m often amazed at the shit women will put up with for guys they dread losing. They will jealously love and fuck some fat dumb talentless stretch-marked-beer-gut-having unemployed asshole who beats them regularly if they think he could fuck a younger prettier girl.
LikeLike
“And the entire culture reinforces the idea that the way for men to be attractive to women is to treat them like equals.”
(((the entire culture)))
LikeLiked by 1 person
Also I’ve come to notice game functions as an effective substitute for foreplay. You can rub her clit and kiss for an hour or just make her think you’re having second thoughts about her. The end result is the same. Urgent, writhing, passionate sex.
LikeLiked by 2 people
BJ, you just put a yuge smile on my face and made me chuckle.
How many White b@beez has she pushed out for you?
LikeLike
3 so far
LikeLike
Trouble is, dread and genuine desire aren’t necessarily the same. Dread may just motivate her to “fake it” more often for fear of losing you. If you couldn’t care less whether she’s faking, fine. As long as you don’t kid yourself.
LikeLike
I think dread and genuine desire are exactly the same thing. If she dreads losing me she will genuinely desire to fuck my brains out.
LikeLike
After thinking it over, I feel like this is one of the moast profound kkk0mments ever poasted au Chateau – that women experience even greater sexual titillation from abstract psychological abuse [== fear] than from actual manual tactile stimulation of their clitorae in MeatSpace.
This is Truth Speak at a level which ought to send a chill down your spine.
LikeLike
Dread is easy, peasy, just like any skill in which you have unconscious competence.
LikeLike
Just get a chick u don’t give a fuck about fucking and she will always be ready to fuck lolzzzzzlolzzzzzlpllalol
LikeLiked by 2 people
With a true throwaway bitch it truly doesn’t matter so no tension ever he he he
LikeLiked by 1 person
Even Immanuel Kant knew that it was grotesquely immoral to use another human being as a means to an end.
And Kant was a nihilist.
LikeLike
Dread, shmedd, you’re going to get to a point when she can divorce for cash and prizes, the kids and the house, the threat point as Dalrock likes to call it, is all. It is real. Even the Trumper hisseff was susceptible, what, twice? Thrice? Four times? Who can keep track of that fucker? He hasn’t hadda jerk off since the third grade. hundreds of chicks, every chick in her prime. The ones coming back to the well, the strippers and other broads, they ain’t bad lookin’ slags, but they all have a threat point even after years and years. And there ain’t a shred of honor in em. They always come back to the well. Course, that’s at Trump’s level. At our level, there are the kids, the house, child support. Dread helps get a girl’s panties off, I don’t know WHAT keeps them loyal long enough to raise the kids.
LikeLike
“Dread helps get a girl’s panties off, I don’t know WHAT keeps them loyal long enough to raise the kids.”
Dread, Dread, and moar Dread.
LikeLike
You don’t know shit from shinola. boy. Dread isn’t the threat of divorce. It’s the threat of cutting off the attention you give her. You make yourself available to more women and she gets less. You make her compete and keep her chasing and she won’t even think about looking elsewhere. But you have to be careful to give her enough attention so that she doesn’t give up.
LikeLike
My guess is Trump could have kept any one of those women as long as he wanted. They most likely bailed out and took the cash as a consolation prize because they couldn’t compete with a never ending supply of young beautiful women vying for their man’s attention.
And you are right, that is a whole different level than 99.999% of guys.
However the dynamics of female attraction are the same at all levels. Women generally don’t leave men they are attracted to, and dread is an effective way to keep them attracted.
Incentives matter, but when your wife divorced you it probably wasn’t because she wanted money. Who did she fuck after that? Rich guys who were nice to her, or deadbeat pieces of shit who treated her like garbage?
LikeLike