Feed on
Posts
Comments

Tiki Torch Vigils

Just like candlelight vigils, except with bigger candles!

This has been an edition of Your Daily Reframe.

210 Responses to “Tiki Torch Vigils”

  1. Xtrabeing says:

    I feel as stupid as Captain Obvious, but what’s a tiki???

    Like

  2. Jim says:

    I see a lot of memes making fun of those guys for using tiki torches. I’ll admit, it’s a little lame… but for fuck’s sake, having a candlelight vigil for everything isn’t? Please.

    Like

    • I know there’s a lot of expense thar goes into these thinbts, but some more atrention to the propa would have been good.

      Like

    • TLM says:

      I made a light-hearted jab about the tiki torch march on Gab and it was not received well. I said it reminded me of the candle lit Take Back The Night march on the 90210 tv series when they went to college back in 1992. Those guys need to get a sense of humor.

      Like

      • Ironsides says:

        It’s probably difficult to have a sense of humor about being “light-heartedly jabbed” about a march when it ended the next day being drenched in urine, feces, wasp spray, the blows of your enemies, and the concerted shrieking of every cuck and traitor in existence. I’d say cut them a little slack at this point.

        Like

      • TLM says:

        Well if men are going to do a candlelight march without it being perceived as kind of gay, I would suggest doing it like this (Start at the 1:34 mark);

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Dixie is actually a good natured song about life, love, and good times. This is how it is meant to be played.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Here’s the health of the next door Mrs. and the girls that long to kiss us.

        Like

      • markpower49 says:

        Until they use their 2nd Amendment rights to protect their 1st Amendment rights, antifa, BLM and SJWs will continue to shut them down, along with the corrupt police and politicians.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      I think just because “tiki” sounds funny, it’s a lame try-hard typical lefty snark to make out like using that type of torch is some sort of neener-neener, when it’s obvious that a bunch of people marching at night with big fire looks pretty damn cool.

      “Yeah, okay, whatever… next time we’ll wrap rags around tree limbs, mo-fo.”.

      Or maybe carry those old railroad lanterns… they’re pretty cool too, amirite? 😉

      Besides, I cannot, in good conscience, poke fun at tiki torches… it’s ray-ciss and disrespectful to our South Pacific brethren.

      Liked by 1 person

      • oink says:

        is a torch; and is on fire

        well puritans gonna puritan

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        I figured they used that kind of torch because it’s much more stable and controllable for something like this. Unlike the Antifa, they weren’t planning to set anything on fire, after all.

        Liked by 2 people

      • As Ironside said ,

        … Unlike the Antifa, they weren’t planning to set anything on fire, after all…

        That is right.

        and I suppose they wanted to carry something that does not look like a weapon or reminds anyone of the pitch and torches in Hollywood movies,

        why? because the left and their media will use anything to point and accuse the right of anything.

        Tiki lamps look harmless , if the “gay” tiki lamp help shut up the left and their media then it is worth it.

        Like

      • Damn straight. The photos came out great, and it looked like the night was well lit up! Albert Speer and Leni Riefenstahl would have been proud!

        Besides, WTF would anybody else have used???

        Like

      • HungarianPatriot says:

        Torches were fine but the khakis with the golf shirts was a mistake. I don’t know if that was premeditated or not but I hope for their sake they don’t make it a regular thing. Extremely unintimidating. Then again if they dressed like the Hungarian Guard the American leftist would shit themselves and declare a national emergency.

        Like

  3. plumpjack says:

    coming soon to a heritage America monument near you: flamethrower vigils!

    Like

  4. mendo says:

    Soon. . .

    Liked by 6 people

  5. tteclod says:

    A debate seems ongoing regarding whether the planned rally hurt or helped the white interests.

    What say ya’ll?

    Liked by 1 person

    • I think it was a battle lost, but a pyrric victory for the left. They’ve had to clamp down harder and harder to cover things up the last few days. They’re scared.

      Liked by 1 person

      • It clearly scared someone, as evidenced by the unprecedented crackdown from silicon valley and full-on media blitz. I can’t think of anything else that would draw this type of response. 9/11 certainly didn’t.

        All this because a few White men threatened to begin asserting their own interests.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Publius says:

        (((They))) will erase this blog soon.

        Like

      • oogaboogaman says:

        Isn’t their a Goebbels quote about political power belongs to those who can control the streets. The alt-right did just that, even with the police and city gov’t doing everything to endanger and disrupt our men. We maintained tight shield discipline and quickly came to the aid of our comrades. Also, despite media shrieking most people already know where they stand politically. To the left Trump is a nazi, alt-lite will stick with Trump, then you have the vegetables who don’t care as long as there’s beer and tv, lastly is the alt-right wildcard.

        Like

      • skorzecin150 says:

        The goyim know.

        Like

    • ML says:

      It’s just going to get harder to have a backbone in public. Galvanizing the mob shaves off the time we have left before being hunted down for insufficient bellyfeel about that which is killing us. It is good to fight, but it’s better not to antagonize the mob — and paradoxically expect them to side with you.

      The alt-right is wilfully blind to the cascade effect we are witnessing. Imagine you’re in Europe, later years of the Empire, Christianity is pretty much everywhere, but you’re pagan and don’t want it. Now imagine going into the town square and telling all the newly minted christlings, eager to prove their faith, that they’ve been horribly misled. Do you think no pagan ever tried that? did they survive? did paganism?

      Like

      • PA says:

        The parallel doesn’t work at a crucial point. Christianization of Europe was adaptive for Europeans. Kultmarx is maladaptive, therefore its resilience can only be temporary.

        A better parallel is between kultmarx and an episode of quasi-religious hysteria. Salem witch trial purity spiralling or Jonestown.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Ironsides says:

        Except that Christianity didn’t genetically eradicate its adherents. A pagan adopting Christianity will survive and their bloodline will stretch on into the indefinite future, as will their language, etc.

        If the Left wins totally, that’s it, we’re gone. At this point I think they’ll only be satisfied by physical extermination.

        So your statement is just basically saying “die this way rather than dying that way.” Not sure what your point is here; the “cascade effect” ends with our extermination. Does that mean we should accept it because it’s a cascade effect, even though it means we will cease to exist?

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        Wrong. As long as an individual of species is able to reproduce, it is adaptive for that specimen’s line. That is the only level; otherwise you’ve wandered into group selectionism. What becomes of the whole species (or subspecies) is another matter, and not one of individual choice. Specimens don’t act for the species — and neither do white people. Obviously, no?

        What makes concepts like Dunbar’s number and kin selection relevant is that they show the limits of biological affinity: beyond a certain degree of relatedness, there is usually nothing but negative selection between lines, i.e. competitive exclusion. Which is exactly what we find among white people.

        My analogy works perfectly, by the way, as the sad history of every pagan society shows. (You’ve heard of Hypatia? But nevermind.) Those pagans who stood up to christianization, who rallied around their statues of Jupiter, Athena, Svanhvit, Odin, Agni, Mithra, Ormazd …. their bloodlines usually went kaput.

        Which is what we see among white nationalists, for the most part.

        It means you should be asking yourself what the world can really offer you at this point. If you insist on seeing this as dreadful defeatism, ok, but it could just mean your premises are wrong, no?

        Like

      • PA says:

        It’s certainly not defeatism from your perspective. It’s impassioned yearning.

        Like

      • ML says:

        “A pagan adopting Christianity will survive and their bloodline will stretch on into the indefinite future, as will their language, etc.”

        There’s a profound truth here about why so many whiteskins opt for semitical correctness. The path of least resistance is very favorable to servile bloodlines. Slave revolt in morals, 2.0.

        Why do you suppose the Neanderthal DNA in us came from females and not males? what happened to those Neanderthal men?

        Liked by 2 people

      • ML says:

        Guilty there. “That which is falling — must also be pushed.”

        Liked by 1 person

      • Ironsides says:

        How’s that “survival mechanism” working out for the South Africans?

        Like

      • PA says:

        Neanderthal men were either killed in conquest or the male of the hybrid was infertile.

        Liked by 2 people

      • tteclod says:

        It’s contrary to my intuition that you write, “It’s just going to get harder to have a backbone in public.” I instinctually desire to double-down on most of the issues purportedly prompting denouncements.

        I think wide swaths of the population occupying American country want me dead because I’m white-skinned, and would kill me, my wife, and my children if they had power, such as you accurately describe was the case for “pagan” Europeans. With the threat that such people will ascend to power imminent, I’m more inclined – not less – to oppose such aspiring genocidal leaders in public before they attain sufficient power to make good on their threats.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Carlos Danger says:

        You fail to see that this is ALL about religion.

        Like

      • ML says:

        “Neanderthal men were either killed in conquest or the male of the hybrid was infertile.”

        Or: H. sapiens males were better at attracting H. neanderthalensis females than the opposite — and the Neanderthal were starved out of the sexual marketplace by artificial scarcity. Very much as alt-right males have been pushed out by crotch-grabbers who entertain eternally shallow females.

        And you won’t see this hypothesis anywhere in academia precisely because the analogy hits too close to home.

        Liked by 1 person

      • PA says:

        You visibly liven up when someone addresses you without insulting you, but you can’t handle that.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Most pagan conversion was voluntary and involved the gift of literacy. I have no desire to submit to Jewish tyranny.

        Like

      • tteclod says:

        Agreed, Carlos, but which religion are we and which is the belligerent enemy?

        Like

      • ML says:

        tteclod-

        I know the feeling. Honestly, that’s why I say it — I’m the guy who’s going to throw down over it immediately. And I really cannot afford to anymore. So maybe I, too, feel threatened by all of it, knowing that it means I’ll have to get in more and more fights with the mob.

        But I also know these fights are for nothing. The die was cast decades ago as far as white demographics: we are dying back right now. If you want to pass on your genes, ok, I respect your nerve and I pity your issue, as you’re pretty much just passing them the hot potato, hotter with each hand-off.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Well, thank you for trying, PA. I don’t dislike your blog at all, by the way.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I still say all this Neaderthal stuff is eyewash.

        My ancient folk were Cro-Magnon… anything before that is Cyberian mumbo-jumbo.

        One guy says only White folks have N in ’em, another says it predominates in (((ykw)))… all I know is my skull is closer to that 1600cc brain case than to the sloping ridge of the rest o’ youse yeggs.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        TT

        my intention is to avoid bloodshed and anything I will feel dishonored for. But death before dishonor and I will kill for my family. Military action would require a force organized and well disciplined enough to achieve its ends. That hasn’t emerged yet. Call me Strelnikov.

        Like

      • Passer by says:

        You are just a loser, ML. If jews got depressed because of their tiny numbers and bad odds and accepted defeat and conversion, it would be over for them. Instead they are tenacious and always punch back harder. They do not care that they have tiny numbers, they do not despair because tomorrow the goyim could kill them all. Numbers are not everything, as jews proved. Therefore as long as there are white people, there is hope.

        If the jews can fight for their interests, then white europeans can too. So i suggest you start dong something for white people instead of trying to sound “wise” and “interesting”. That’s useless narcissism. Start a web site or a propaganda channel. Donate money. Write a great article and spread it. Do something useful other than bla bla bla. Or stop wasting other peoples time.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Synagogue of Satan is the enemy and Christians and sympathizers are on our side. Christianity has become an important screening tool although I like Wiccans for the most part too, and protestants.

        Like

      • Hello ML, you sound very concerned!

        Glad to hear you’re “the guy who’s going to throw down”–lends a sporty macho touch to so much blackpilling about White Men’s Doomed Genes.

        And this running précis of evo psych pedantry–having a Stage Three?

        “Feeling brave”?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Damn, Lucius… if THAT’S not the most sublime shiv-cum-movie-homage yet, I cannot think of a greater.

        I bow to a master mechanic.

        Liked by 1 person

      • greginaurora says:

        https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/07/04/science/neanderthals-dna-homo-sapiens-human-evolution.html

        “somewhere in prehistory, at least one female human from Africa must have carried the child of a male Neanderthal.”

        The article is worth the read. A brief summary: ancient Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA was replaced with human mitochondrial DNA. Mitochondrial DNA is passed from mother to child. Consequently, during the mixing, it was Neanderthal males having sex with the human females. If it were the reverse, we’d see Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA either in our modern population or in the end-race Neanderthals. Instead, it’s exclusively modern Human (African).

        African male/Neanderthal female children did not live; to be precise, there’s no genetic legacy of Neanderthal females, so any AMNF hybrids would have been genetic deadends.

        Neanderthal male/African female children eventually replaced the original Neanderthals with a modern-Neanderthal. NMAF hybrids displaced the original.

        The whole idea is a reverse of what I expected. I thought the darkies were raping the redheads, but it sounds like the reverse is more true.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Interesting. I admit I haven’t been keeping up with this.

        Maybe PA was closer to the mark: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35992612

        Neanderthal Y-DNA going extinct through poor histocompatibility.

        Any case, the point was that people have been plowed under by invaders, parasites, and general cascade effects before, and we can be sure they resisted more often than not.

        Note: I don’t believe anyone is going literally extinct, at this point. Modernity preserves types all too well. But, that’s small comfort to those dreaming of a white reich.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Heinrich says:

        It is much more complicated. Google the elongated sculls of Peru. It is a different human species. The video show a newborn. Do not tell me that it is cradle boarded.

        Like

      • Heinrich says:

        DNA testing (haplogroup) says that this species came from Europe and the Middle East.

        Like

      • Heinrich says:

        The layers of deception are manifold. Science and history are NOT excluded.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      A debate seems ongoing regarding whether the planned rally hurt or helped the white interests.

      When I first heard of it, I thought it was merely meant as an in-gathering of patriotic types with a dollop of alt-R, much like what you’d expect from a Trump rally, except without so much of a family atmosphere (read: not for women and children).

      I learn recently it was tied into some protest of pulling down Confederate statues and such, well… that already doesn’t really ring the chimes of most White folks who, while not unfriendly towards our Southern brethren, don’t really care about Civil War history and such, and certainly wouldn’t take a day off from work to make a statement about that part of White heritage.

      So from the start, it was a loss leader, unity wise.

      Now add in all the factors of a) inimical media bias, b) inimical local gummint, c) kooks and plants representing our side, and d) heavy police presence to (allegedly) guard our lily White asses from a mob of BLM and antifa miscreants who are sure to outnumber us two- and three-to-one, well… fail more.

      Like I said before, you want support for THAT sort of all-down-side event, you gotta take away the average White ‘Murrican’s cable, beer in the fridge, and McD’s on every corner… and show him a few thousand Brown Shirt equivalents ready to knock commie dick in the dirt, police or no police.

      Like

      • DrWynnLloyd says:

        I wrote a gigantic post and it was snitched by the mod.

        I strongly believe that we will triumph. I firmly believe that the right demographics are on our side. I also believe that the God Emperor reversed the situation. Today so well that the r true deal is a net win. Nevertheless, the God Emperor was able to pull the victory deep from the jaws of defeat solely due to his own personal rhetorical skill. Spencer et al really need to sit down and get realistic about their limitations, and get some better advisors. Spencer needs to accept that sometimes the most advantageous path for the movement is not necessarily the one that gives him the most face time. These rallies need to be cleaned up of bad imagery also.

        We will triumph in the end. I have no doubt. A white baby boom is occurring as we speak. It’s just getting started. I’m having my fifth this winter. Vox Day predicted this would happen after the election and he was right; early signs of it are springing up.

        This doesn’t even take into account that God is on our side. Not everyone has to believe but I do. The Savior protected Trump from defeat and his Mother made sure we had enough liberal tears to eat with our cereal on victory day. I have faith this will continue, and no setbacks will be more than temporary.
        The God Emperor proved this today.
        Sorry for my rant. I haven’t slept in quite a while, but I can’t do so while a black pill descends on CH.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Good on ya for that imminent fifth child, and good on ya for that strong faith.

        Like

    • plumpjack says:

      at the end of the day it was simply a chance for each side to measure the other up. but mostly it was a chance for the altR to measure ITSELF up, to see how big the gap is between the theory of it’s ideals and the actual implementation. (pretty big).

      antifa was like the heavyweight champion that thinks it doesn’t have to prove itself anymore. just coasting on their past glory. lazy. arrogant. out of shape. owned and corrupt. nothing new there.

      the altR larpers are the like the up-and-coming fighter, eager to prove itself, but still making lots of mistakes due to lack of experience. it needs a surprise knockout in order to win because the fight has been rigged by the civilization’s version of Don King.

      right now I’m simply hoping for a divine intervention. a large natural disaster striking some liberal area like California would shift the overton window dramatically right without bloodshed. we could then get on with the business of establishing order.

      it is wishful thinking, but it is the best possible way out of this deadlock.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. Publius X Maul says:

    as we predicted 2 years ago. (((they))) own the internet

    http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2017/08/15/daily-stormer-down-white-supremacist-site-loses-domain-in-wake-charlottesville-violence.html

    this site will be attacked too.

    the internet has allowed us whites to find each other and realize we are not alone

    (((they))) cannot allow that.

    Like

  7. plumpjack says:

    some interesting and insightful follow up discussion from knowledgeable people about where we’re headed in this post.

    http://blog.jim.com/war/not-time-for-war-yet/

    “Not time for war yet
    A lot of people are saying that Charlotsville means time for war.

    No, not time for war yet, because the God Emperor says to cool it. You have to go with the King you have, rather than the King you would like to have, because otherwise it is democracy, and we know democracy does not work.

    When they arrest him using a warrant from some judge no one has heard of, then likely it will be time for war.”

    Like

    • oogaboogaman says:

      Very true plumpjack. Now is the time for us to continue to train and buy more beans, bullets, and bandaids. Hopefully, Trump gets elected again in 2020.

      Two books to purchase are Resistance to Tyranny by Joseph Martino and the US Army Guide to Combat

      Like

      • Wrong Side of History says:

        How many of you have actually been in a fight before?

        I just think it’s cute how lightly so much of the AR takes the prospect of civil war.

        You have no fucking clue.

        Liked by 1 person

      • oogaboogaman says:

        Many times. Have hit dindus with belt buckcles, kicked people in the balls, pulled box cutters on people, broke noses etc etc. What bout u homie?

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        I don’t treat it lightly; in fact, I expect to die if there’s conflict. But it also infuriates me that these scum have been busily turning our nation into Yugoslavia on Hell-Level Steroids for decades, and setting up this giant powder train. ;

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        How many of you have actually been in a fight before?

        I just think it’s cute how lightly so much of the AR takes the prospect of civil war.

        You have no fucking clue.

        The self confidence comes from the incompetence of our enemies. You lose every confrontation you have with us, badly. You have niggers, we have veterans. Its been 35 years and I still remember all of that stuff I learned back in the engineers. There are about 35 million men like me, many with TONS of combat experience who want a piece of commie ass and have been chomping at the bit for some commie ass for years. I am one of them. You are going to lose so badly it warms my heart to think of all those dead liberals and niggers. Once the stink is gone, we will be free.

        Liked by 1 person

      • JironGhrad says:

        Not sure I’d go with the current Ranger guide. It’s become just a pre-req for promotion rather than elite training since the late 90s. Green beret curriculum would be more useful with the emphasis on unconventional warfare and improvised combatives.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        The RHB is way bigger than it used to be. It was under 200 pages back in my day. Still good basic infantry tactics. Get that stuff down first.

        Like

    • HungarianPatriot says:

      Man that Jim guy has a weird blog. I’ve been reading it on and off for about a year. He’s either a genius or insane or autistic.

      Like

  8. Jim says:

    Look at the girl in the first picture:

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/charges-sought-toppled-confederate-statue-49226601

    They really are a bunch of degenerates.

    Like

  9. oink says:

    I have no desire to submit to Jewish tyranny.

    together with gorillion other catchcucks enthusiastically cucked for Massa. and eagerly killed Christians and destroyed Christian polities at the order of your puritan/ unitarian-universalist/ anabaptist overlords.

    and will (without doubt) continue to do so until the Righteous Judgment that is to unfailingly to come when you will receive the punishment that you duly deserve. Lord Have Mercy

    And don’t worry your little cathcuck brain, if jews are found wanting in their ability to control the hu-whyte labourers, Massa has the bindi-gooks replacements in place

    This is WHY we lose, Herr Greg. The likes of Farley elbowing with ((Morgenthau)) for a turn at servicing FDR.

    P.S. KKK dindu nuffin

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Carlos Danger says:

    Like

  11. Olorin says:

    A debate seems ongoing regarding whether the planned rally hurt or helped the white interests.

    What say ya’ll?

    ~~~

    It will encourage “antifa”–both the paid agents and their degenerate barnacles– to act worse the next time.

    That’s a good thing. Regrettable, but good.

    Like

    • Ironsides says:

      True. One of the enemy’s worst and most inevitable weaknesses is that they are, by nature, detestable, and are having a harder and harder time hiding it.

      Liked by 3 people

    • what happened in Charlottesville only made the white-right wiser. They learned where they went wrong.

      it only confirmed that there is indeed a war on white men.

      and it confirmed the entire left and the media hate the white race more than they should.

      this time the white-right(*) lost the battle, but they have not lost the war.

      (*) Is anyone else calling them the “white-right” or have I invented/ coined a new term?

      Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      It does not matter if it hurt or helped…it was NECESSARY. The fucking fucks on the Left, with their dindu army, is going around ripping down historical statues – our history. Lincoln statues and Mount Rushmore are not far behind, trust me, if this does not stop. So, street action IS necessary. Do you think Hitler came to power by posting letters to the paper? Like CH has said many times, hard times make hard men. Be a hard man.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        ” Do you think Hitler came to power by posting letters to the paper?”

        Jesus H Chr!st, you’ve been on a tear today – “ISIS… destroying historic statues” on the previous thread and now “posting letters to the paper” on this thread.

        SRSLY. The era for Narratival horsesh!t like whining in a Letter to the Editor ended circa 1960.

        The biology IS the Culture. Cultural warfare IS biological warfare.

        Go for the gut – either with your ridicule & your negs, or with your __________ [starts with a “g”, ends with an “n”, and has a “u” in the middle].

        Like

  12. Interesting development…

    Trump asks why ‘alt-left’ not being blamed for Charlottesville violence

    ‘I think there’s blame on both sides,’ the president tells reporters.

    By NOLAN D. MCCASKILL 08/15/2017 04:27 PM EDT

    Like

    • I think Trump just bailed us out here. Big time. Now the left has to get all outraged about his comparison, and people will have to reconsider the completely one-sided narrative they’ve been fed from the MSM.

      Liked by 2 people

    • PA says:

      Trust the God Emperor. He plays the long game. He also makes lemons from lemonade, and VSP’s criminal action gave him a hammer like no other.

      Liked by 2 people

    • plumpjack says:

      nice.

      ““You look at both sides. I think there is blame on both on both sides. I have no doubt about it … if you reported it accurately, you would say that,” he said.

      Trump also condemned what he called the “alt left” demonstrators that charged into the crowd of alt-right protesters without a protest permit.

      “Do they have any semblance of guilt? What about the fact that they came charging with clubs in their hands, swinging clubs? Do they have any problem?” he asked. “I think they do.”

      Trump described the day as “horrible,” but that he was willing to see both sides.

      “I think there is blame on both sides,” Trump said. “I have no doubt about it and you don’t have any doubt about it either, and if you reported it accurately, you would say that.”

      CNN’s Jim Acosta protested that the “neo-nazis” started the violence by showing up in Charlottesville to protest the removal of a statue depicting Confederate general Robert E. Lee.

      Trump did not deny that there were “bad people” in the alt-right group but said that there were some protesters who were not white nationalists or neo-nazis that were protesting.

      Trump dismissed media assertions that he was putting the alt-left and white supremacists on the same moral plane.

      “I am not putting anybody on a moral plane,” he said. “You had a group on one side and the other and they came at each other with clubs and it was vicious and horrible.””

      http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/15/donald-trump-reporters-charlottesville-violence/

      Liked by 1 person

      • This is a defining moment. Nobody in a suit, let alone in office, has shown this kind of moral clarity in a lifetime.

        Made all the more delicious, by plan or not, by the dialectic of seeming retreat followed by doubling down on acknowledged culpability to go around–now pointedly framed by his attack on “Alt-Left” violence and the Left’s desire to defenestrate Washington and Jefferson.

        A beautiful day in the (get triggered lefties!) Trumpenreich.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        they smelled blood in the water. turns out it was THEIR blood.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

        Remember back during the glorious campaign when it seemed the Emperor was going soft on immigration? Then he delivered a speech in the Southwest the next day (Phoenix?) and lowered the boom on immigrants and their Cuck enablers like never before? I certainly do.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain John Charity Spring MA says:

        It’s good stuff.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I heard Trump say the “there’s blame on both sides” statement.

        Thank God for at least THAT small favor.

        Now he’s got to follow it up by having the justice department take a hard look at the tapes and make sure some arrests occur and felonies on “that other side” prosecuted.

        Bonus points if the truth comes out, sooner than later, about whether the guy who drove the car into the crowd did it due to panic about the mob surrounding his car and threatening him.

        Because if that’s NOT the story, and he did it the way the (((MSM))) say he did, then hang him too.

        But get the truth out FAST, while it’s still fresh in everyone’s mind what the (((MSM))) claimed as terrorism.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Les, I remember that exact moment in the campaign. I even wrote in my journal after that speech in AZ that he’d win the whole damn thing.

        Like

    • safespaceplaypen says:

      Everyone with half a brain knows the past two years have been packed with leftist/anti-fa violence. It’s a waste of time even compiling a list. The media barely reports it, or brushes over it, but everyone knows it.

      What Trump successfully did was he dodged the rhetorical chess move by the media/libs/etc. of trying to associate every person at the rally with being nazi’s AND he dodged the rhetorical chess move of thinking that since 1 person was k!lled by a right-winger, that must imply that the side which experienced the fatality was totally innocent.

      These are tough rhetorical talking points to dodge. Trump is definitely king of the re-frame.

      Liked by 1 person

  13. Heinrich says:

    Trump just called out the Left!

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Heinrich says:

    TRUMP ON CHARLOTTESVILLE: “What about the alt-left that came charging at the as you say the ‘alt right?'” pic.twitter.com/4xhQhDW5R2

    — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) August 15, 2017

    Like

    • Heinrich says:

      I am not finished, Fake News…

      Liked by 2 people

      • Johnny Redux says:

        OK, that video impressed me a bit. Trump has me on a rollercoaster of emotions. Oh shit, he’s using game tactics on me! Push, pull, push, pull.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Johnny, we’re witnessing it right from the master himself.

        He is OUR president!

        Liked by 1 person

    • ML says:

      I think he just threw the alt on there assuming there must be a counterpart.

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      “I’m not finished, fake news”.

      It’s good of Trump to now (after the big kowtow about hate and racism) mention the culpability of the other side.

      But why does he let the press just keep shouting, instead of demanding they answer the question before the discussion goes any further?

      Because basically, it’s just a shouting match that just makes both sides think they’re winning… like I said before, now he needs to follow up and at least tweet (if the (((MSM))) won’t publish) demands of footage of the antifa and BLM violence…

      … and ESPECIALLY get to the bottom of wtf really happened with that guy that drove the car into the crowd… because THAT, in and of itself, puts the onus of violence on the alt-R in the minds of John and Jane Q. Public.

      But in the end, I’m not sure winning the hearts and minds of anyone whose heart or mind isn’t won by now is going to truly change anything.

      If they mean to have a war, then let it start here, amirite?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Amasius says:

      That scene brought me back from the brink of despair.

      I would be happy if he never read another (((Kushnerian))) talking point bullshit speech ever again. Just speak your heart and tell the truth, Donald.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Sentient says:

      Reporter: Do you support white nationalists, then?
      [Cross talk. Reporters shout questions.]
      Trump: Well, George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So, will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down- Excuse me. Are we going to take down, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?
      Reporter: I do love Thomas Jefferson-
      Trump: OK, good. Well, are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue? So, you know what? It’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture and you had people, and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists because they should be condemned, totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, OK? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats. You got a lot of bad people in the other group, too.

      Like

  15. elmertjones says:

    Cheetos also work well as an expedient torch material.

    Like

  16. oink says:

    re: TrumpFuhrer

    O ye of little faith!

    Liked by 1 person

  17. jOHN MOSBY says:

    I see the banned and not at all missed jewjones is liking the habsburg halfwit maranno squeeler’s posts. May you join him soon in ban-land, you hapless fuckwit.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Moses says:

    I’ve always thought the Alt-Right would be smart to adopt the trappings and style of the 60s eft to push their agenda. For example:

    – Locking arms and singing folk songs with acoustic guitars
    – Handing out flowers to masked Antifa thugs
    – Documenting carefully with photos and video all unprovoked acts of SJW violence
    – Talking points about peaceful protest, non-violent resistance
    – Sit-ins

    Done correctly, this would re-brand the left as violent anti-democratic thugs. Leftie heads would explode.

    The leaders of the “Unite the Right” rally were fools who gave the left exactly the club what they wanted to bludgeon and demonize the alt-right.

    It’s like watching sharks in a feeding frenzy. Total, mindless hysteria.

    Like

    • Ironsides says:

      I think it would be total, mindless hysteria no matter what.

      White men organizing for their own interests has them in full Red, Purple, and Ultraviolet Alert mode.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        No shit. Look at the shills we have here now. They are changing tactics too. Oink makes more sense and is no longer just the crazy babbling fool speaking truth to power. ML seeks to reason with us. ML seeks to peddle hopelessness and KG3 wants us to go quietly in the night. They have all been here before under other handles. The problem for them is they have run this story so many times we know it by heart and its time to go Negen. Satan’s bargain with God is over now.

        Time to piss off Lucy and talk Catholic prophecy. To the Talmudic Satan worshippers among us: You have had your 100 years to destroy Christianity. You have failed. From here on out, all your endeavors will fall flat and fail despite your best efforts to the contrary. That has indeed been the pattern. Go convene a council.

        Liked by 1 person

      • DrWynnLloyd says:

        Carlos-
        Bless you for your post.
        I am going to mass tomorrow because of your uplifting me with that comment.
        “Go convene a council.”
        What an absolutely amazing piece of rhetoric for the spiritually aware.

        Leo said he’d have his hundred years. Time’s up though. He harmed a lot of people but he failed to end the Church.
        Between that and the 100th anniversary of Fatima there is so much significance there.
        Thank you.

        Like

      • ML says:

        “ML seeks to reason with us.”

        Anything but that!

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        You have with me ML and I respect you for it.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Glad someone got it. Good on ya for going to mass too. I feel as you do about the EGK.

        Like

    • greginaurora says:

      If the Indians had been held by the Chinese, rather than the English, Gandhi’s passive resistance would have resulted in lots of dead Indians and continued Chinese rule. Instead, they had to merely reason with the English, and the English left.

      The hippies of the 60’s were “resisting” the same caliber of Men; they weren’t willing to kill the resistors, so they conceeded everything and lost everything.

      Our enemies are not like them. They’ll kill us without hesitation. They can be neither trusted nor reasoned with. They hate us and want us dead.

      Like

  19. plumpjack says:

    d-a-i-l-y-s-t-o-r-m-e-r up and running on the dark net. you’ll need a tor browser. address is on w-e-e-v’s gab account.

    that might be a good backup plan for if this site gets shoahed. dark net. impossible to shut down.

    internet whack-a-mole. heh.

    Like

  20. plumpjack says:

    it’s happening!

    “When Oakland nurse Maria Mendoza-Sanchez noticed an incoming call Tuesday afternoon from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the mother of four waved her f@mily into her bedroom and put the phone on speaker.

    She knew there was a chance, albeit a very small one, that she would receive an 11th-hour piece of good news — one that would spare her from having to split up her f@mily by moving to her native Mexico with her husb@nd and youngest ch1ld Wednesday under a federal deportation order.

    But Feinstein told Mendoza-Sanchez, as she stood surrounded by loved ones, that immigration auth0rities had denied the request of a stay for her and her husb@nd, who have lived in the U.S. for more than two decades but do not have legal status.

    One immigration expert said the denial of the stay was indicative of clear shifts in the government’s approach to deportation. In past cases that received attention from the media and opposition from local politicians, ICE would often change course, fearing negative publicity, said Pratheepan Gulasekaram, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law.

    ICE “is sending a message with this removal,” he said. “Everybody is potentially a target.””

    http://m.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Oakland-family-facing-deportation-delays-flight-11820799.php

    Liked by 2 people

  21. Wild Man says:

    Here is Paul Craig Roberts nicely unpackaging the underpinnings of Charlottesville:

    http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/14/charlottesville/

    What strikes me particularly is this paragraph:

    “The liberal/progressive/left along with the media has abandoned the working class for Identity Politics. Identity Politics teaches that women, blacks, and homosexuals are all victims of white heterosexual males who are characterized as the victimizer class, that is, those who victimize others. The doctrine delegitimizes white heterosexual males in the same way that Nazi doctrine delegitimizes Jews and communist doctrine delegitimizes capitalists. There is no difference.”

    What strikes me, is that though PCR’s sentiment is technically true, it doesn’t really capture one further, deeper, key observation of the alt-right (which as an aside, I think could be better coined as ‘true west’), and that is:

    1) Jews were instrumental with respect to the invention and implementation of communism

    2) Jews were instrumental with respect to the invention and implementation of the current doctrines (i.e. – the identity politics espoused by feminism, and post-modernism) that delegitimizes white heterosexual males

    3) the Nazi doctrine with respect to the JQ presupposed the occurrence of both both (1) and (2)

    This circularity is why this is so fucking weird and why most people don’t get it. At the end of day, the dominant cultural perspective will keep spinning it’s wheels, and chasing it’s tail, unless the truth of (3) is admitted. German national socialism was reactionary. What it was reactionary against must be precisely and unblinkingly identified, for everybody’s sake (including for the ongoing sake of the Jews). But what are the chances of that? The Jews are their own worst enemies. They keep playing interference on this issue of issues of the modern political era (i.e – the era of mid-1800’s to present day).

    Like

    • Publius says:

      Quit wasting your time trying to find logic in leftism. The only thing that makes sense is Jewish hatred of white people combined with control of the media and academia.

      https://mobile.twitter.com/DerrickQLewis/status/897235297485901825/video/1

      Like

      • Wild Man says:

        Publius – I’m not wasting my time on this. There is a logic to the alt-left, albeit the logic has been promoted by prominent jewish thinkers. This particular jewish logic presupposes the existence of a sacrificial scapegoat, and any social dynamic logic that includes this sacrificial scapegoat element will naturally produce the outcomes we see occurring today (as per the links you have provided) , and the outcomes that occurred by way of communism, and the outcomes that occurred by way of the nazis, and the outcomes that have been common throughout all of human history and prehistory, as a matter of fact (history), or by way of reasoned speculation (pre-history).

        But what I am asking is – well why do the jews think this way? You say because they hate, pure and simple. Might not be that simple. And one tell for that – well think ahead with respect to your logic then. A group of haters that cannot be reformed must in the end be eliminated – yes? But does that not then put the haters (2nd order haters) of the haters (1st order haters) in the same category then – both as unreformable haters?

        Here is the right question then. Why do jews, and the various ideologies they espouse, which many western people tend to fall for (like sheeple), always include within their social logic, the presupposition of the sacrificial scapegoat?

        Rene Girard insinuated a very sophisticated and nuanced answer to that question. The answer is – because they are not Christians (and note that the truth of the matter is Christianity is a western construct). As such the jews are still suffering from some of the superstitious thinking that marked the pre-Christian mindset. The magical sacrificial scapegoat is the perfect concept for the superstitious mind to resolve itself upon, and therefore to return to comfort, to return to a state where one’s mind produces no further questions, free of anxieties. But of course to do this is a massive cop-out, and what has set the west apart, by way of western principles …… is that our best thinkers began to not fall for this superficial superstitious cop-out.

        Look ….. it is like this. Jewish mindset is a throwback to old ways. There is a huge tendency for everybody (jews and non-jews alike) to revert to this more ancient mindset. But the jews are special in the sense that they are fucking obsessive compulsive about it. So the question becomes – why are jews particularly obsessive compulsive about it? That is pretty much where things stand right now, at the deepest levels of analysis, as far as I can tell. I have been offering some speculations around this last question. Best we get on with this so we can all find a way out of the quagmire. When that very weird jewish women – Barbara Lerner Spectre, said that jews would be at the center of European transformations, she is completely right – but not in the way she thinks though. No – it is because the ongoing western transformations still do have many built-in tensions that need to be resolved, and the most central tension of all is that there is still a huge tendency to revert to superficial superstitions centered on the scapegoating dynamic, and the jews are at the center of that.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Good post. Transference of guilt to a third party is a common Satanic concept. It is one of the reasons the pedophiles murder their victims after sexually abusing them. The incantation that goes with it also transfers the guilt they have for their crimes onto the victim. It is the idea behind the scapegoat too.

        Like

      • Wild Man says:

        More jews saying weird things:

        http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-16/gary-cohn-reportedly-disgusted-deeply-upset-trumps-last-few-days

        The jews are very weird. Their sentiment on social dynamics is very weird. Endlessly weird. Obsessive compulsively weird. They tend to compulsively kneejerk to this weirdness. Where is the nuanced reason? The only jewish nuance is around the smokescreen – they are good at the nuanced smokescreen. But the underlying sentiment – logically unsophisticated, superficial, superstitious. Stupid.

        Like

    • Captain John Charity Spring MA says:

      Quite profound.

      Like

    • Ironsides says:

      Yes, there’s a bizarre disconnect that makes the record skip repetitively at a certain point in most people’s understanding of the world, rather than advance. Condemning Nazis has become such an absolute demand of Modern Virtue that they can’t even be seen quasi-neutrally in context.

      All those right-wing German fighting leagues — the Freikorps, Stahlhelm, etc. — who would eventually coalesce into the party was a direct RESPONSE of normal, masculine, patriarchal, patriotic German veterans to an out-and-out effort of the communists to kick off a German Revolution to match the RUssian Revolution.

      At that time — in the 1920s and early 1930s, the “formative years” — the (((communists))) were running amok and slaughtering millions not very far away, in Russia. It was a close-by, real-time event for those krauts, indicating “this is what will happen to you if you don’t stop your own Reds.”

      Nor was that analysis incorrect. The Russian communists wrote and spoke gloatingly of seizing Germany’s industrial power and using it as a springboard to global revolution; they invaded Poland in an effort to get at Germany and aid the Reds there, and were thrashed by Pilsudki for their pains.

      Like

      • Ironsides says:

        I could expressed my point more pithily thus:

        The Jews sowed the communists. They reaped the Nazis.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Wild Man says:

        “The Jews sowed the communists. They reaped the Nazis.”

        Nice – so pithy it’s meme-worthy. I hope people will run with this meme of yours now. Will force alot of long overdue and necessary discussion.

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      This is all discussed in the Goy Guide to World History. I strongly urge all of you to watch it. Great work important to us all.

      Like

  22. Publius says:

    Jews like this literally don’t understand how stupid they are. And he has not a clue.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/EricKleefeld/status/897238558561501185

    Like

  23. Publius says:

    This retard gets to call himself an American well our occupied government keeps out white women who just want to make white babies after the Jew taught our own white women to be tatted up slut whore idiots who don’t want families

    Remember that when it starts

    Like

      • Publius says:

        At the risk of again stating the obvious to the people here, the fact that (((they))) control even the new media really does matter and all this yada yada bullshit about first amendment doesn’t apply to private corporations really is bullshit. There is been a merger of the (((government ))) and the ((( big corporations ))) as I stated 15 years ago . they literally have succeeded in pretty much eliminating any conservative voices from Twitter or YouTube and now they are flat out erasing websites as we predicted two years ago. this knowledge is at risk of going away and people being isolated again with only the jew York times for News which is how they made World War II happen as they had the last 50 years. something must be done

        Imagine if sites like this blog had been shut down five years ago how many millions of us would still be blue pill and not understand that we are not alone?

        Now PayPal has canceled Vdare, literally seizing assets without due process. Daily Stormer is gone and despite his tough talk three days ago he has no power/- he is gone , nobody can read his insights anymore unless he comes on a blog like this and leaves comments but that is not the same as his domain being there

        Communists literally cannot allow speaking truth –do your research on what actually happened under the Soviet communists and get ready

        Like

      • Publius says:

        Dear Jews: the only Americans who have been discriminated against since 1965 are white men, and by association our women and children who need us to have a reasonable chance at a decent life. Happy to educate you , you fucking evil retarded pieces of cunt puss.

        Additionally, no black person alive today in America has been a slave. On the other hand, slaves still exist in America. Every self-employed white man who has paid taxes into the system that is openly trying to destroy us is literally a slave. I know your defective Jew brain is not capable of understanding that fact, but smart people are.

        Like

  24. Dailystormer is back on clear web

    https://dailystormer.ru/

    Like

  25. http://img.fark.net/images/cache/850/e/eS/fark_eSla8Jx4-emafiE2ftro57wgSZQ.jpg?t=WzAF-EeYB-9XHlrYtq0jdg&f=1503288000

    This is the kind of shit they’re posting… they really do think they can do no wrong and are on the “right side of history”.

    Like

    • Invoking the name of the “greatest” generation is odd. People know they would be appalled by the country as it looks now. They can’t be evil bigots and Nazi-defeating heroes at the same time.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        They can’t be evil bigots and Nazi-defeating heroes at the same time.

        An excellent point… the next time some fool babbles about patriarchy and oppressive White men, just say “Oh, you mean the Greatest Generation who defeated the Nazis and made the world safe for your lame squawking?”

        Could go back even farther and say “You mean all those White men that fought and died to end slavery?”

        Alas, it’s just a piece of verbal jew-jitsu to gainsay their tripe… while in our hearts, we know BOTH those groups of White men may have been somewhat (ahem) misguided, amirite?

        Like

      • Captain John Charity Spring MA says:

        Everyone knows that they are dupes.

        Like

      • oink says:

        Schicklgruber sez hi.

        Like

  26. FH says:

    Maul’d Left.

    Like

  27. myshariamoor says:

    ‘Alt-Left = ” Al’ Tleft “!
    A name to reflect these LOOOOOOOOSERS’ pro-JIHADI practices!

    Like

Leave a Reply