Feed on
Posts
Comments

Tucked in a great thread discussing the banality of White SWPL virtue signaling is this comment from Ricin Beans,

I said in the shoutbox earlier that contemporary society encourages snark about things that should be considered sacred, and sentimentality about things that call for hard headed realism.

It’s all part of the leftoid SWPL’s escape from any reality that would challenge their concocted religion: Equalism, and its core tenets Race and Sex Creationism. In practice, it means a complete turning of their backs on their ancestors and their heritage, and a betrayal of their descendants (what few they leave).

The good news, if there is to be any, is that the SWPL Equalism religion, founded on a falsifiable view of their relationship with the material world rather than on a transcendent view of one’s relationship with the supernatural world, won’t last very long. Factual counter-evidence too conspicuous to ignore or sarcastically dismiss will inevitably, after an initial frenetic burst of indignant piety upon confrontation, hollow out the emotional bond liberals have to their equalism religion and many will drift from the flock, harmlessly neutering themselves and the social damage they’re capable of inflicting.

For the others, those too committed to their virtue signaling and delusions about humanity to ever lapse from their pattern repudiation faith, the stone cold material world they uphold as their malleable Heaven will crush their hopes, over and over, until the will to life abandons them. Something we see already happening in the cratering birth rates of the most zealous Equalism followers.

100 Responses to “Freelance Comment Of The Week: Reversing The Sap-Snark Polarity”

  1. […] Freelance Comment Of The Week: Reversing The Sap-Snark Polarity […]

    Like

    • > “until the will to life abandons them. Something we see already happening in the cratering birth rates”

      Like

      • ultimathule1 says:

        Captain Obvious, this image that you posted of a beautiful young pregnant White Woman is infinitely more sacred to me than any religious icon of any church could ever be (assuming, of course, that the father of her baby is a healthy White Man).

        Like

  2. Wrong Side of History says:

    True believers are only moved by projectiles.

    Like

  3. tteclod says:

    “It’s all part of the leftoid SWPL’s escape from any reality that would challenge their concocted religion… The good news… is that the SWPL …religion, founded on …the material world rather than on …the supernatural world, won’t last very long. Factual counter-evidence …will inevitably… hollow out the emotional bond liberals have to their equalism religion… For the others… the stone cold material world …will crush their hopes…until the will to [live] abandons them.”

    Your argument appears opposed to itself. Are we to believe the SWPL leftoids self-comforting fantasies, the god-selling con-men to the contemptibly hopeless in search of comforting myths and half-truths, or our own lying eyes?

    I don’t know about you, but I can’t tell any man to believe a lie, no matter what comfort it might bring him.

    Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      tteclod, I agree. We have been duped in believing that we need religion in order to counter the religious death cult known as Islam. We don’t. I also do not believe that we should peddle a lie to counter a bigger lie. Our race and culture speak for itself, and either we have racial pride, and national pride (based, largely in part, on race, of course), or we don’t and we go down the proverbial shitter. Look at France’s ‘national’ soccer team playing against Portugal right now. Half the team is coal-black Africans, in NO WAY connected to the history of France. Yet, the French will cheer on ‘their’ team because the spear chuckers are wearing blue uniforms with the French flag on them. What an embarrassment. That team is about as French as the Cleveland Cavaliers is.

      Much of the West is operating on the fumes from past greatness. If you took everyone out of France, England, etc.; took away all the art, historical buildings, modern amenities; and then put everyone back, does anyone really believe they could recreate it all? Doubtful, with the racial mix as it is now. It would be utter chaos.

      Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Portugal (with a couple of blacks, but mostly actual natives of the land) beat the negro mercenary team of France. Hurray! I was happy to see this. Don’t put your hopes and dreams in the negros, Froggies! Wake up.

        Like

      • Apart from the civilization that Christ built you don’t have a culture.

        Like

      • Abraham Lincoln says:

        Yes! if a certain group of parasites are also taken out of France, England, etc.

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        So, G.i.L., we win our freedom from the Left, only to land back in the “Believe in Christ as your saviour or die, sinner!” pot that you have simmering for us? I think you make my argument for me, that Christianity is a cult, where one is forced to believe or be ostricized from the community as a fool or oddity for non-belief. It is not compatible with true freedom of the White man/woman, or our closeness with the God of Nature, of Blood oaths to kin, of not turning the other cheek.

        Keep your Middle Eastern/Jewish cult for yourself. It has provided ‘some’ good for the West, but the magnificence that was created under it, including the great Cathedrals, came at other costs to our people, and were achieved because OUR people were Christians, not BECAUSE our people were Christians. (And you are clearly confusing a non-acceptance of Christianity as a belief in no Supreme Being – an argument that I did not make).

        Being a Christian does not make the greatness…the race/people do that. Never forget that fact. Also, as I have noted several times on this site, our people were great, and had great, advanced civilizations WELL BEFORE Christ-insanity came on the scene. The Romans had large cities, advanced sewers, clean water systems, and heated flooring, during early years of the Republic (400 B.C.!), in addition to the Rule of Law, highly trained armies, etc., etc.. And look at Ancient Greece. There are others, to be sure, but those two stand out.

        No, I say again, we succeeded despite Christianity, not because of it. Also as I noted before, if the 300 Spartans who headed off to Thermopylae to hold the Persians at bay were Christians, I am not so sure things would have been the same.

        One final comment on this issue, since it popped into my noggin’. Do you know what was the turning point (actually two) that turned Europeans away, en masse (pun intended) from Christianity? Accident? Just tired of it? No, it was WWI and WWII, when people saw that so-called Christian nations, who on top of that were for the large part racial brothers, decided to line up and destroy each other instead of fight for peaceful resolutions. All too eager to slaughter each other under the banner of your Christ. Many said, rightly, what a bunch of bullshit, and years on…what a bunch of lies and waste of life. Religion, once again, used as a means to get the herd to do the will of the politicians. Never again will brother fight brother! So, I reject your Christianity, because IT rejects me and those who think like me, and those Christians would LOVE to see us punished for not obeying Christ and letting this insanity continue.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Johnny Redux says:

        @G.I.L., God is one thing, Christianity is quite another. The latter makes you a sucker for (((their))) tricks, by turning your back on Nature and the Old Ways. Good article for you: http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-jewish-sound/

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        I grew up with soccer, but the sport lost much of its’ appeal right around the 1990’s or thereabouts, for precisely those reasons.
        Few of the current teams – especially national or ‘premier’ league teams – have any connection anymore to the towns or neighborhoods they are originally supposed to represent, they’re basically all just international all-star teams.
        ‘Franchises’, if you will.

        On a larger scale, even as a kid and teen in 1970’s/80’s Europe, I noticed that there really wasn’t any such thing as modern European culture.
        Pretty much everything you might define as culture was either a lukewarm re-hash of something from before WW I or a lame copy of something American or simply imported directly from the US, without any attempts to modify it.
        Seems like the Euros didn’t really know what to do with themselves in a post-imperial world, and many still don’t.

        Like

  4. If you don’t consciously worship God, you will unconsciously worship something else.

    Liked by 1 person

    • DH says:

      Chesterton?

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      This is the fingers-in-the-ears truth that the self-styled “independent and intelligent” thinkers don’t admit… the fact that EVERYBODY worships something… and their god is usually the paltry human self… at best a wily elf.

      Like

    • ultimathule1 says:

      “If you don’t worship God, you will unconsciously worship something else”.
      I consciously and defiantly worship my own sacred bloodline, which was shaped by thousands of years of hardship on the cold northern edge of Europe. I regard my own Ancestors (a word that I always respectfully capitalize) with a deep and humble reverence that I have never been able to give to some alien Middle Eastern deity. I also regard as sacred the soil of the land that they tilled and fought for, and where their bones are buried.

      Like

    • cortesar says:

      When a man stops believing in God he doesn’t then believe in nothing, he believes anything.

      ― G.K. Chesterton

      Another variation true for great majority of mortals

      “Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites…in proportion as they are more disposed to listen to the counsels of the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of knaves. Society cannot exist, unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere; and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.”
      ― Edmund Burke

      Liked by 1 person

    • Johnny Redux says:

      @realgary: Don’t confuse a belief in God/Supreme Being as being a Christian, or following organized (often perverted) organized religion. God is in you heart…not residing in a man (or, now, lesbian) in a robe behind a pulpit.

      Like

    • Reb says:

      Myself, my pleasure.

      Like

  5. Some people need religion, some don’t. I don’t want to argue with either group. More important issues to hammer out.

    Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      I agree. One can believe in a Supreme Being (the Prime Mover, as the Ancient Greeks would say), but not be a part of perverted organized religion. Christianity has been hijacked, so its time to admit that. Yes, there are pockets of resistance here and there, but on the whole (by a great margin), Christianity (with a focus on peace, love, tolerance and weakness) has been weaponized against the minds and souls of our people. Believe in God, as he/it speaks to you and your heart, but not in man’s religions.

      Like

      • Ripp says:

        The liberal anti-white cultmarx ideology that were fightng against is essentially a religion.

        The danger is that its place of worship is the (((MSM))).

        Before tech, digital phones, printing press, information was controlled through the places of worship. Now information is still controlled by (((those))) that own the distribution much in the same way.

        Were fighting a ‘godless’ religion of cucks, fags, non whites and self hating whites that have been indoctrinated with a false reality.

        Telling them the truth about human nature is like telling a jew to accept Jesus.

        Like

    • Find me someone that doesn’t have an understanding of reality that extends beyond empirically established fact and I will show you a person in a vegetative state.

      Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        So, G.i.L., we win our freedom from the Left, only to land back in the “Believe in Christ as your saviour or die, sinner!” pot that you have simmering for us? I think you make my argument for me, that Christianity is a cult, where one is forced to believe or be ostricized from the community as a fool or oddity for non-belief. It is not compatible with true freedom of the White man/woman, or our closeness with the God of Nature, of Blood oaths to kin, of not turning the other cheek.

        Keep your Middle Eastern/Eskimo cult for yourself. It has provided ‘some’ good for the West, but the magnificence that was created under it, including the great Cathedrals, came at other costs to our people, and were achieved because OUR people were Christians, not BECAUSE our people were Christians. (And you are clearly confusing a non-acceptance of Christianity as a belief in no Supreme Being – an argument that I did not make).

        Being a Christian does not make the greatness…the race/people do that. Never forget that fact. Also, as I have noted several times on this site, our people were great, and had great, advanced civilizations WELL BEFORE Christ-insanity came on the scene. The Romans had large cities, advanced sewers, clean water systems, and heated flooring, during early years of the Republic (400 B.C.!), in addition to the Rule of Law, highly trained armies, etc., etc.. And look at Ancient Greece. There are others, to be sure, but those two stand out.

        No, I say again, we succeeded despite Christianity, not because of it. Also as I noted before, if the 300 Spartans who headed off to Thermopylae to hold the Persians at bay were Christians, I am not so sure things would have been the same.

        Like

    • CarpeOro says:

      There is a God shaped hole in all normal psyche. It is filled one way or the other. Those that lack that hole tend to be atheists, who interestingly enough are found to have an empathy level approaching that of psychopaths. No civilization or culture can survive based on the views of psychopaths – there has to be some interest in family and tribe or it will fall apart in adversity. An example is modern society – denying God and cutting natural ties. Elders are not respected and often don’t act in ways deserving of respect. Men, the bulwark and creators of civilization, are vilified instead of encouraged (why encourage someone when you don’t care? Waste of MY time and effort, Devil take the hindmost).

      Like

  6. Publius says:

    Just saw a Bud Light commercial featuring Fat Amy Jewmer and a “man” pushing the “women get paid less for same work” lie!!!

    This is more throwing it in our faces. We literally cannot boycott all of the companies doing this because the are ALL doing it.

    Anheiser-Bush damned well knows that 90% of their market is white men.

    Unbelievable.

    Civil war soon.

    Like

    • Publius says:

      this is like Obama lecturing white men after 9 days in a row of mass murders committed by brown people (counting the ones in Europe and the middle east)

      it’s hubris.

      Like

    • Found that ad on j00t00b – wow, Amy J00mer is FAT. Maybe even heftier than Len✡ Dunh✡m. Yikes. Who the f*ck does InBev think is their target audience for Budweiser? N!ggerz wanting to f*ck a filthy fat j00ess?

      Like

      • Amy Joomer uses the “myspace angle” in real life– bitch has so many extra chins she needs one more just to gain ballast.

        Amy Joomer once explained, “Hollywood told me I either had to lose weight to be the leading lady or gain weight so I could play the Fat Best Friend.” Oy vey, the humblebrag lies! Bitch, please! You’re so fucking fat, YOU ATE THE FAT BEST FRIEND.

        Seriously. I can see the Fat Best Friend still kicking inside one of her extra chins . . . .

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        Rarely did I see something so obnoxious,arrogant and disgusting as that (((Rogen thing)))
        To couple him with a ((( vulgar fatty))) is a frontal assault on your senses perpetrated by ((the merchants of ugliness)))

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        InBev: “Drink Budweiser so that you can be ugly, unfunny & FAT, just like Seth J0gan & Amy J00mer”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InBev

        Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      We may not be able to boycott ALL of them, but we can certainly boycott most of them.
      I can’t remember the last time I bought something featured in an ad, there are no ad campaigns for vegetables, fresh meat, bulk grains or generics.
      What part of my money doesn’t go to the vet goes to thrift shops, used book stores, skate shops, Army/Navy surplus, etc.
      And as for beer – you should be drinking water…….

      Like

  7. Lately I just ask for citation when someone asserts the equality proposition.

    Women are equal to men is the assertion. In what? Citation please.

    Cornel West has a conniption because his people aren’t treated equally? Do they behave equally? Citation please….

    Women get paid less than men? For the same work? Citation please.

    This is to be followed by laughter and nothing else.

    Like

  8. not my name says:

    Speaking of “equality”, this is almost enough to make me stop drinking Budweiser.

    Of course, I predicted that this pair would degenerate into this kind of crap.

    Like

  9. Libertardian says:

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/07/10/voice-men-facebook-page-unpublished/

    Yesterday: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
    Today: “I believe in free speech, but…”

    Like

    • Libertardian says:

      https://kakistocracyblog.wordpress.com/2016/07/09/waiting-for-the-singularity/#comment-18892

      “The insanity of the left reminds me strongly of their communist brethren. In each case, the crazed Marxists decide that some ineluctable part of human nature is the root of all evil, and declare their intention to destroy it forever in order to make the world into Utopia. The communists targeted the human acquisitive instinct — a survival trait — and tried to destroy it. The demographic traitors of today target the human tribal instinct — an even more important survival trait — and try to destroy it.

      Yet in each case, the fanatics remain the puppets of the very instincts they attempt to destroy. And thus, instead of destroying them, they come to embody them in a grotesque, schizophrenic fashion. The communist states, dedicated to eliminating capitalism, turned into huge tyrannical monopolistic corporations, their assorted politboros functioning as murderous boards of directors.

      The supposed anti-tribalists of today become utterly fixated on tribe — displaying frenzied, bellicose loyalty to other tribes and hatred of their own.”

      Like

  10. Johnny Redux says:

    “As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their hearts desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”
    ~ H.L. Mencken

    “Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you. ”
    ~ Pericles

    “The Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
    ~ Thomas Jefferson

    “It is useless for sheep to pass a resolution in favor of vegetarianism while wolves remain of a different opinion.”
    ~ William Inge

    “A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.”
    ~ Alexander Tytler (1787)

    Like

  11. Dagwood Bumsteer says:

    Anagrams never lie. BLACK LIVES MATTER = TERSE TV BLACKMAIL.

    Like

  12. Days of Broken Arrows says:

    Lately I’ve been calling out SJW talk because it makes moral judgements about people — something the left has long said is wrong. What I do it use their own talking points against them. Who are *they* to judge if we can’t?

    Example:

    Her: “Dating a younger woman is wrong. Blah blah blah.”

    Me: “It’s not against the law, so you’re making a moral judgement. Sounds a lot like people who say being gay is wrong. Why do you get to impose your morals on others, but they can’t.

    Her: “But there’s an imbalance of power in the older male-younger female relationship, etc. Blah blah blah. Etc. Blah blah blah.”

    Me: “Says who? That’s an idea, not a statistic. There are people who say interracial dating is bad and give statistics. That’s legal too. Will you be coming out against that next? Because at least your have stats then.”

    Her: Changes subject immediately.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Johnny Redux says:

      The worst shiv to a woman over 35 is to see a man her age (or in her perceived age-group dating pool – which is anyone at or over her age) with a younger women – especially a much younger woman, because she realizes that the power has shifted, and that she has NO power over that man (since sexual desire and favors is the biggest motivator of men), and therefore she must hurl contempt and insults at him to prevent other men from making a similar move. If you can’t twist men with promised of sex, then shame them into submission. Sadly, a great deal of men believe the crap that comes out of women’s mouths. Assume for whatever they say on any topic – ‘age appropriate’ dating, immigration, race relations, political parties, etc. – the opposite is true.

      Like

  13. cortesar says:

    Nathanyahoo visits Uganda 40 years after the Entabe raid, trying to relay Africans against Palestinians in UN
    Strange creature apparently Uganda president takes podium and speaks
    to (((the esteemed guests)))

    The utter hilarity ensues

    Like

  14. Danger says:

    Quick, think of a non-white, US located villain who made national news in the last year.

    Now find one who’s villainy actions were not the fault of whites.

    Like

  15. cortesar says:

    Nothing beats a good cartoon

    Like

  16. Johnny Redux says:

    Remember, back before fat-butt Kardashian and the negrification of America (and large parts of Europe), when the build of these girls (present day, South Korea) was the standard for feminine beauty?

    WARNING: These videos of thin, hot Asian women are addictive.

    Like

    • ultimathule1 says:

      Yeah, what is it with this sudden new cultural mandate that proclaims fat asses to be a desirable attribute of women? It seems to have appeared suddenly out of nowhere, as if (((somebody))) had arbitrarily decreed that it should be so.

      Like

    • Lazy Hero says:

      Just one comment, they all appear to have had surgery to look white, or they’re Eurasian…

      Like

      • tteclod says:

        A dirty secret of Japanese and Korean society is their appreciation of European beauty, in theory AND practice. So, yeah, more Eurasian than you’ve been led to believe.

        Like

      • CarpeOro says:

        High levels of plastic surgery. There is a procedure to remove the epicanthic fold and create more caucasian/larger looking eyes. Jackie Chan had it done for instance.

        Like

      • Barry says:

        As aneeded Aryan blond male asian women want to fuck me and Asian gay men want to fuck me too.
        Yaoi…is a cartoon genre all about the homoeroticism of the white man.

        Like

    • Reb says:

      Lol and Asians are racist af

      Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      And, think about this: In (((their))) attempt to make the negro body (here, the sub-Saharan black female form, with grossly large buttocks) the new sexy (which was probably item #697 on their list of 3,000 things to do to us to cause total cultural decay), you did not see large numbers of White males, or even small numbers, start to suddenly be attracted to black females. Nope, instead, out weak link…our females…were the ones that bought the lie (like they are the first, and sometimes only, ones to buy all the past lies, and the ones to come), and started doing everything possible, including hitting those squat bars, to enlarge their butts. For who? White men? Black men? General attention because they believe that is how they should look to be attractive? I am going (for 80%) at least with the last one. Women do what the lie masters tell them to do. If they said one-armed women were hot, there would be a rush on amputations.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. cortesar says:

    On the other hand I know that there is a lot readers of Times of Israel here

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnBv8pRXgAMcDTr.jpg:large

    Like

  18. It appears that the sum total of what human beings have done in the 20th C – including “changing” human nature – has been essentially an Ozymandias project, its only posterity being ruins.

    Consider this.

    https://theconversation.com/the-problem-with-reinforced-concrete-56078

    The summary is that concrete structures reinforced with rebar inevitably suffer from concrete disease (spalling) which means that no concrete structure has a life span beyond 100 years and many have a very much shorter life span.

    This suggest that the vast majority of reinforced-concrete structures in the world – buildings, bridges, roads and dams, sport complexes, entire fucking cities – will become either worthless or not worth maintaining well before the end of this century.

    The upside is that with many fewer than 7 billion people, we aren’t going to need all that infrastructure anyway.

    Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      And yet the Romans mastered the technique of mixing concrete (the exact formula is lost to time, sadly…probably some of that knowledge that the Christians forgot to save for us) over 2,000 years ago, with many of their structure still standing AND some (including aqueducts) capable of being used to this day, with NO maintenance in the last 1,600 years of so (the Empire ending in approx. 476 AD).

      Like

    • Agent X says:

      I’m sorry, but I have to NathanFillion.gif that article.

      There is nothing wrong with reinforced concrete….a reinforced concrete structure will outlast anything else other than stone. Wood and steel frame structures without maintenance would be long gone before equivalent structures out of reinforced concrete.

      Think about it….if the argument is that eventually corrosion of the steel will destroy the structure…how is that any worse than a steel structure its self. At least the reinforcing steel has inches of concrete to protect it. Its like paint but thinker.

      Take any structure out of any other material other than stone and put it next to those pictures of decaying reinforced concrete structures in severe marine environments. They’d be absolutely gone. Look at anything made of steel or wood that is not maintained or permanently underwater.

      Interesting point about civilization, but completely junk science.

      Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        @ Agent X

        Your reply is the kind of reflexive, defensive junk that so often renders worthless any broader discussion of any kind with an engineer. They constantly strive to bring everything back to some narrow area of expertise, no matter that it is not relevant to the discussion. Does my head in.

        You say

        “….a reinforced concrete structure will outlast anything else other than stone. Wood and steel frame structures without maintenance would be long gone before equivalent structures out of reinforced concrete.”

        Well I did not fucking-well say otherwise!

        The point to be taken from my comment and from the article is that societies, in all of their manifestations, require maintenance. Certain parts of modern society – from the extravagant built modern environments to the insane fantasies of the left – are too costly to maintain and will therefore inevitably decay.

        The linked article puts a timeline on one aspect of the unsustainable way that we have lived these last one hundred years. By analogy – engineers often seem not to understand them – the same things that have permitted rampant marxist insanity have also permitted the massive expansion of concrete world.

        With re to your final words of dismissal: “Junk science”. This conclusion does not follow from the points you adduce in your comments.

        Engineers. Not always of course, but so often, they just produce these painfully tedious gamma-isms. They really are the internet’s natural trolls.

        Like

      • tteclod says:

        Concrete does not protect steel from corrosion: concrete in contact with steel corrodes steel. I don’t write that to be an asshole, but simply to inform you of something you may not know because so many of us (my younger self included) do not recall subtleties of chemistry, and these subtleties invariably do us harm.

        In certain environments, such as marine structures, (competent) engineers alter the concrete mix design to decrease to porosity of the final concrete. This does not, of itself, protect the steel reinforcement, so the reinforcement is often coated with a “seal” to inhibit steel corrosion.

        Like

    • tteclod says:

      Here’s my opinion as a structural engineer.

      1. With few exceptions, buildings are not intended to survive centuries. Builders should contemplate a maintenance, repair, and replacement schedule for every building. For most people, a structural life of 100 years is sufficient. For some, 20-40 years is plenty.
      2. Cost-effective alternatives are not readily available: wood is not equivalent, modern masonry is also steel reinforced, Steel may be a viable alternative, but doesn’t really solve the foundations problem. Unreinforced brittle materials do not fare well in earthquakes and high-wind events. Maybe we’ll replace all these materials with transparent aluminum, but I don’t expect to work with such materials before I retire.
      3. The linked article mentions alternative materials and cathodic protection. Alternative materials, as mentioned above, are not readily available. Cathodic protection has merit, but I’ve not personally explored it. I do expect to see cathodic protection added to the building codes in 10-20 years. Also, Cathodic protection may be installed AFTER THE FACT and arrest further damage.
      4. Masonry, for all it’s strengths, deteriorates. I have a meeting tomorrow to discuss “what to do” about exactly such an issue related to mortar deterioration.

      If there’s a change to be made, it’s an assessment of which buildings must remain functional “indefinitely” and which (most) may have a lifespan, and what that lifespan should be. I am confident my great-grandfather did not intend his barns to last into this century, 40 years past his death, but they’re still there, rotting away.

      The broad lesson, gentlemen, is that men must maintain civilization, else all falls to ruin.

      Like

  19. Johnny Redux says:

    Like

  20. Moses says:

    Years ago I read an apocalyptic novel where a comet strikes the Earth. Civilization is reduced to tribes — some groups become marauding nomads, some try to protect themselves and restore pockets of civilization. It’s brutal.

    There’s an uppity female character. One of the men says “Sister, women’s lib got terminated when the comet hit.” (Bear in mind the novel was written in the 70s).

    Feminism is not natural. It will not last one way or another. The UK/USA/Aussie will become 3rd world shitholes, the muzzies will take over, or both.

    Like

    • Moses says:

      The book is “Lucifer’s Hammer.” Pretty good read, if a bit dated.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucifer%27s_Hammer

      Like

      • Mahdi says:

        There was also a scene in which a guy discovers his wife has been raped and murdered by a gang while she was frantically packing her makeup and other beauty products just after the SHTF.

        Like

    • Reb says:

      The muzzies will take over America then Russia takes over the world.

      Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Moses, feminism (what a misnomer, if I ever heard one) is a parasitic philosophy, totally incapable of surviving and expanding through its own adherents. Instead, it had to attach to a healthy body State, and leach from its resources, all the while sucking the life out of it.

      If all men disappeared, how could women…and feminists specifically, keep the lights on? They simply could not. Ignoring the dangers of unmanned (literally) nuclear reactors, dams, and such, civilization would come to screeching halt, and within 1 month there would be The Walking Dead sorts of chaos. Food shortages, disease, death, mayhem. Clams gonna clam.

      I need to find that book. Sounds like a good read. Conan was written 50+ years ago, but its still a classic adventure, so maybe your book is not so dated as you may think. Danke.

      Like

      • CarpeOro says:

        Lucifer’s Hammer was written by Jerry Pournelle. While some of it is dated, the science is still sound. Other works by him that should be on your list are any of his future history stories (The Mercenary, West of Honor, Oath of Fealty, High Justice (twofer)). Great stuff. He is working with Castalia House (Vox Day’s publishing house) to re-release the There Will Be War series and even doing an addition to the series. Castalia House has a ton of good stuff and can be found on Amazon or their site.

        Like

  21. Vincent says:

    ROFL:

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Mahdi says:

    This would be true if it weren’t for the fact that the SJWs too often control policy before their comeuppance, at which point they are replaced by fresh SJWs, thus ratcheting anti-us policies forever.

    Like

  23. Reb says:

    Yup because they are fucking idiots. Just use like a piece of toilet paper and discard when finished with them.

    Like

  24. Stationarity says:

    Someone has said that great civilizations decline when they reject the things that made them great.

    Like

  25. MC227 says:

    Every great civilization that has fallen is due to one thing the demographic that made it great was overrun by people less intelligent, less hard working, different culture. The Egyptian culture that designed and built the pyramids were white and blacks were used for labor and then they mixed and down they went. Same with Romans, Aztecs, Mayas etc. The US won’t last another 100 years with the importation of Africans and Muslims.

    Like

  26. >transcendent

    Just so we’re clear, Abrahamic texts and their derivatives are *not* transcendent.

    Additionally, falsifiability is a marker for testing truth value. Things which (((transcend))) falsifiability are almost useless. I say almost, because there can be positive behavior effects in believing and meditating on such things.

    Like

    • Reb says:

      This is true when the fairy tale is still pointing at something true in the universe. We tell our children silly things to get them to behave. Like the tooth fairy, the Easter bunny, Santa, etc. But the adults in the room still know better.

      This is why Christianity can be OK at times but we must remember that it is still a crutch and becomes silly and ineffective when abused. The cosmos is indiffernent so deal will it. The Romans didn’t put up with that bullshit.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion