Feed on
Posts
Comments

Spot The Family Beta

spotthelesserbeta

¡Jeb! Bush…. needy, desperate, cloying, approval-seeking beta since his inception. “Come on, Dad, why are you letting George have Laura over but I can’t bring Columba? Why? WHY??!” “Jesus, son, do I have to spell it out? Your wife is bad for the family image. And she smells like a Taco Bell bathroom.”

Patriarch Bush is the old school WWII alpha, stoic against the gnawing realization of disappointing sons regressing to a long lost genealogical mean. Greatest Generation? Meh, they raised the Boomers.

Dubya is the swaggering, striver alpha male — a lesser alpha — who barely pulls off the act with help from a natural reservoir of rascally frat boy cockiness and permanent alcohol buzz. Also the second worst President in history (after Downlow Soetoro).

Now that it looks like the Bush political dynasty will end stillborn with Jeb’s campaign of nonstop self-inflicted humiliation, we can all breathe a sigh of relief as we await the Coming of the One True Alpha wielding MAGA, the Sword of Cuck Smiting.

245 Responses to “Spot The Family Beta”

  1. I’ve been spending a lot of time lately looking at old pictures and wondering about the power of prophesy and this idea that a photograph can steal a piece of your soul. Poor Jeb.

    Like

    • Laguna Beach Fogey says:

      If you look closely at the photo, it almost looks as if ¡Jeb! is deliberately exposing his flank to the shiv.

      Typical cuck.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        In addition to the whining, and the fact that his Dad & Brother are ignoring his whining, the guy just looks a Will Ferrell parody of himself – wearing outdated suits [in the wrong color], and an outdated hairstyle, in an attempt to look hip, but which instead makes him look like a complete fool.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        For the MPC body-building crowd in the Alt-Right: Jeb was a sufficiently good athlete to have played a year of varsit!tty tennis at UT-Austin, which ain’t nothing to laugh at. [Hint: None of you could do it, at least not nowadays.] And yet, without the correct INNER FRAME, all of that external athleticism is friggin worthless.

        Like

      • Laguna Beach Fogey says:

        Okay I though I was the only one who noticed the suit and hair. lol

        Compare and contrast Jeb’s suit/shirt/hair with those of his brother and father.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        I take it, aside from poor taste, he’s wearing that suit to stand out, to be apart from HW and W; to be his own man, so to speak?

        Oh crap, just noticed they’re bellbottom pants! Dafuq!?

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        For all of you MPC body-building meatheads chez Le Chateau: Jeb was a sufficiently good athlete to have played a year of varsit!tty tennis at UT-Austin. Which only serves to prove that all of the external athleticism in the world is completely worthless without the correct INNER FRAME.

        Like

      • Suburban_elk says:

        the guy just looks a Will Ferrell parody of himself – wearing outdated suits [in the wrong color], and an outdated hairstyle, in an attempt to look hip, but which instead makes him look like a complete fool

        Exactly!

        Also interesting about the varsity tennis thing. Very tall, rich, tennis playing, handsome [then] – and it adds up to nothing.

        What did they do to him in that family?

        Like

    • “I’ve been spending a lot of time lately…wondering about…this idea that a photograph can steal a piece of your soul.” … because you are a superstitious lunatic who wants absolute certainty and safety in (your) life. It will be interesting to see how you work photographic soul capture into your Christamite theology. And then you can get the COTW Nobel prize and leave a full half of the comments from then on. Poor blind following the blind.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Do you notice anything unnerving in the following photo? Any sad faces, anyone leaning away from the others, anyone obviously ill-at-ease with the group? Do you get any sense of impending tragedy?

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Because this is what I see, when I look at that poor little girl:

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Possessing the power of prophesy means knowing that the train is going to wreck, and screaming bloody murder to everyone that the train is going to wreck, and pulling your hair out trying to get people to take you seriously, and then just shaking your d@mned head as you step aside and get out of the way and watch the horror of it all unfold.

        Like

  2. I have to give you praise for calling out W. We’re all in agreement on the left, but Dubya was one of the worst Presidents in history. Those that are defending him are refusing to throw their support behind Trump, because he doesn’t embody “real conservative values”. Cucks.

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      In Dubbya’s defense… he really was trying his best…

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Campaigned in 2000 for relaxing security checks on Musl!ms. Campaigned in 2000 for “NO NATION BUILDING”. Mushy feel-good “Compassionate Conservatism”. Initial post-9/11 reaction of “I am on a crusade” was correct, but then a walk in the Rose Garden, hand in hand with the Crown Prince of Bin-Laden-land, and he completely changed his tune: “!slam is a Religion of Peace”. Veto’ed the Pentagon’s desire to nuke Ben-Laden-land.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Wanted payback on Saddam Hussein for attempting to assassinate his father [GHWB-41], so got us in an epic nation-building exercise, trying to get Semitic Sunni to play nice with Persian/Sassanid Shia. Allowed Pakistan to shelter Bin Laden. Looked the other way when the new Afghanistan “Constitution” required that Chr!stian Abdul Rahman be executed. Looked the other way when the Taliban butchered the Korean missionaries.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Medicare Part D, biggest entitlement expansion in forever. Karl Rove’s home ownership idea blows up in CRA Sand State Liar Loans debacle [Mexican Hill Trolls too worthless to make balloon payments]. CRA/Fannie/Freddie implosion allows Paulson to move in and take control; Dubya out to lunch.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Allowed phasing out of F-22 Awesomeness in favor of F-35 Worthlessness. Procured cushy no-show job for Beta brother Jeb at Lehman Brothers, after Jeb had murd3red poor Terry Schiavo. Never even considered prosecuting Bubba Clinton for treasonous pardons at the end of Clinton presidency.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Acquiesced to Ch@rles Schum3r, installed G0ldman S@chs’s Hank Pauls0n at Treasury, in return for Surge in Iraq. Pauls0n proceeds to rig 2008 elections for 0bama, then shoves T@RP down Dubya’s throat [to save G0ldman S@chs] and Dubya folds like a tent. December 2008, Dubya still Prez, Timmy Geithn3r at NY F3d secretly wires $1B to G0ldman S@chs.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Allowed the new Iraqi government to purge more than a million Iraqi Chr!stians from the Middle East – nary a peep out of him – instead, “!slam is a Religion of Peace”. Tried but failed to get Amnesty for the likes of his Mexican Hill Troll Sister-in-Law. Never built the wall on Our Southern Border, even though Congress had ordered it and funded it.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Differential Taxation of Capital -vs- Labor allows Top 1% to accelerate away from Bottom 99%; Middle Class gutted by relentless scorched-earth totalitarian warfare on salaried & hourly employees.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        ALLOWED RAFAEL THE SERPENT AKA TED “CANADA” CRUZ TO INSTALL GL0B0-H0M0 JOHN ROBERTS AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT!!!!!

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Never investigated the murd3r of Lt Quarles Harris Jr at the State Department; never explained what Brennan’s people were doing in the passport files; never asked for a b!rth certificate. Similarly ignored the murd3r of Donald Young at Trinity United Church of Chicago.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        That CRA was some horseshit. And you had a senator from Chicago and a senator from NY pushing for that this hardcore.

        And they got everyone with the fact that if you don’t, you’re racist.

        The book that opened up my eyes to a lot of the horseshit that happened was The Great American Stickup.

        It was then that I learned about Long Term Capital Management and a whole host of other shady shit Clinton did.

        I was so naive at the time, I thought he was a good president, but I was taking in all my info–limited, soundbite info–from the MSM.

        Like

      • Mandy been hear a while says:

        The legion of disasterous misdeeds of Bush’s presidency leads one to question if he was stupid or greedy and evil but smart. In many ways he was worse than Obama.

        His marriage to an infertile boyfriend killer leads me to believe he is a retard.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “boyfriend killer” ——— Circa 1986; Mom wearing dyke-cropped hair; can already discern which daughter will be a breeder and which will go off to Yale and become a childless old spinster bulldyke:

        Like

    • dustydog says:

      Lazy or stupid? Hard to tell. Maybe read a book or webpage. Believe it or not, but America is dozens of years old! There were presidents before George W. Bush! You don’t know about them, because you are dumb and lazy. Some of them were pretty horrible people.

      Like

  3. tteclod says:

    “Greatest Generation? Meh, they raised the Boomers.”

    Thank you for that.

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      By raised you mean both ignored and pandered to…?

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      They made the world safe for pidgin Spanish and Ebonics…

      … I mean, our kids can’t walk most of our own cities in safety during broad daylight… but at least they’re not speaking German, amirite? :duckface

      Cucks who honored comfort more than God… and thereby left a stench in His nostrils.

      Like

  4. Jeb probably has the highest IQ of the three, but being a spergy introvert hinders him.

    Any political success he’s had can be attributed to the multigenerational Bush mafioso.

    Like

    • Alec Leamas says:

      The old man is by far the brightest and wisest. Also probably the most credentialed man to run for President.

      Like

    • Hitfan says:

      All the Bushes are treasonous scum, but I concede that Dubya and H possessed greater charisma or leadership qualities. Jeb! Is a middle management company man at best, for which we should be thankful as the last gasp of his family’s political dynasty dies with him.

      Trump is using his talents for good–and does not get sidetracked in mnutiae, apologizing for media-concocted gaffes or having to justify himself as a technocrat. He almost projects an OCD level obsession with the immigration issue, a political market that is underserved. How has Trump made billions? By making money in markets that are underserved and written off.

      Trump’s critics call him a stupid buffoon, but he is far more prescient and intelligent than what the media portrays him.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “Trump’s critics call him a stupid buffoon, but he is far more prescient and intelligent than what the media portrays him.” ——— In my adult lifetime, the only other public figure who could hold a candle to Trump’s intellect would be Donald Rumsfeld [who is also now despised by the Bush family].

        Like

      • Laguna Beach Fogey says:

        My parents knew the Bush matriarch, Dorothy Walker Bush (1901-1992), back in Greenwich, CT, and always said she was a charming, pious lady.

        I used to play squash at one of the clubs in Greenwich and the walls were festooned with plaques bearing Prescott Bush’s name, who was one of the club champions.

        Like

      • Laguna Beach Fogey says:

        Trump is not a buffoon.

        Trump is about winning–which is what America’s ruling WASP elite was all about before it was (((( infected )))).

        Like

      • CO, H.W. Bush and Rumsfeld were arch-rivals in the Nixon-Ford cabinets. It’s widely believed Rummy got Bush the CIA directorship so as to preempt any idea on Ford’s part of putting Bush on his 1976 ticket, which Rumsfeld was angling for. Bush was on some kind of V-P list going back to 1968 (obviously just the longform talent pool-flatter the whole back bench approach) through Agnew’s resignation and ’76, and of course finally snagged it in 1980.

        Cheney of course was Rummy’s protégé from the Ford White House, and was a surprise pick for Defense, made possible only by the Senate Dems nuking the John Tower nom. Bush had stacked State and Treasury with his other BFFs (technically Reagan gave Treasury to Nicholas Brady during the ’88 election), and this was a spiteful power play to bloody Bush’s political nose from the start of the administration. Without it, Dick Cheney would’ve been a has-been apparatchik and congressman, instead of the Darth Vader they propelled to such respectability that I’ll never forget NPR’s respectful coverage when Dubya picked him in 2000.

        Like

    • Sentient says:

      IDK

      Jeb has a very short bus look about him here…

      Like

  5. Batman says:

    So many posts, CH. I love it.

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      but so many in mod 🙁

      Real time comments rape!!!

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Sometimes there are too many, rapidly back-to-back…

      … a man can’t properly savor the comment section, both as reader and contributor. 😉

      Like

    • I like that he is writing more. We need to fill the internets with the truth to combat the lies of the stupid fuck elites. If we fail in this task, it’s over.

      Like

    • Hernan Cortez says:

      Columba is actually not a real person, she is a product placement for upcoming cable TV horror series from Slimos Carl Productions about the ancient Aztec doll visiting McMansion owners who short-changed or cheated honest, hardworking Latino carpenters and bricklayers out of their well-deserved wages. Bloodbath & Gore guaranteed!.
      Pilot episode: ‘Granite Countertop Bleeds White’ to be aired soon…

      Like

  6. I can’t believe this dweeb (dwJeeb?) wants to run America. Trump 2016!!!

    Like

  7. elmertjones says:

    “Patriarch Bush is the old school WWII alpha, stoic against the gnawing realization of disappointing sons regressing to a long lost genealogical mean. ”

    Like my dad. Thanks.

    Like

    • Hitfan says:

      I’d like to ask the WWII vets if they knew that the world of 2016 was going to be one filled with extreme liberalism, multiculturalism and glorified sodomy, woukd they have fought in the war. I’d also like to travel back in time to 1940 with a portable DVD player and show images of a horrible dystopian future that concludes with Obama winning a landslide election.

      The so called Greatest Generation fought to make the world safer for cultural degeneracy, The only upside was that the Soviet Union only messed things up economically. Thanks to them, Eastern Europe is far less pozzed out than the West. Perhaps those alt rightists who take a more positive revisionist view of Stalin have a point after all.

      Like

      • uh says:

        People take a long time to come around. Around 2005, I realized how stupid we white nationalists were being about Communist regimes, in particular the Soviet Union, and began talking about it to people on the blogs. Here you had a repressive regime operating on a basically impossible program (but far less improbable than the fiction of unlimited growth on which all industrial society operates, but capitalism extols) which preserved the core ethnic group and their traditions. I was living in Vancouver, WA, and would strike up conversation with elderly Russian expats and gently lead the chat in that direction; every one expressed mild to strong nostalgia for the Soviet Union, at least as compared to multicultopia. But from white nationalists, all I got was “Are you a Jew?”, “You must be a Jew,” etc. Christianity was originally a Jewish movement, like Bolshevism, away from Judaism; and eventually, Jews were phased out of it. White nationalists were completely incapable of understanding this analogy, or separating the Jewish involvement in Bolshevism from the later beneficial effects of Communism for the Russian folk. In-group dogmas die hard and last. Not that it matters what we think.

        Like

      • uh says:

        For the record, I don’t believe any regime at all but strict world government can solve the big problems, at this point. And that such world government (or at least highly cooperative, local authoritarianism) is inevitable as more people come into being to jostle each other for what’s left of the earth, of which white people have a rapidly diminishing share.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I think you’re giving too much credit to Communism itself, rather than the innate toughness and resilience of the Russian folk… whose faith was driven underground but burned just as brightly. Muh Solzhenitsyn.

        It helped tremendously, of course, that those regimes fucked up the economic systems and prevented hedonistic prosperity, the likes of which was the true downfall of the West. Maybe THAT aspect of Communism is something to be thankful for.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I’d also like to travel back in time to 1940 with a portable DVD player and show images of a horrible dystopian future that concludes with Obama winning a landslide election.

        Not sure it would have helped… I mean, WHO would have believed it?

        Protests of “But this is how it will actually be!” notwithstanding, most viewers of today’s malaise back in the 1940’s would probably have had the same reaction as we did watching A Clockwork Orange in blackface.

        Also, many of our European brethren might have added: “So what? At least it’s better than Weimar.”

        Like

      • mendo says:

        A Clockwork Orange is the new blackface

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        9.4 on the drollometer.

        Like

      • uh says:

        “It helped tremendously, of course, that those regimes fucked up the economic systems and prevented hedonistic prosperity,”

        I thought that was what I said. Obviously, Communism did not set out to protect the racial integrity of Russians or Slavs, and anti-racism is a tenet of Leninism itself (though not dwelt upon tbh); its repressive economic regime simply had that effect.

        Anyway, “fucked up” is relative. I say queuing up for bread-lines is better than white whores chasing beads from niggers at Mardi Gras. And eventually, we’ll get back to bread-lines. Like the light from dead stars which is still visible to us owing to the distance light must travel, our affluence is already on the way out; we’re just scrambling for what’s left amid the mirage.

        Like

      • PA says:

        “queuing up for bread-lines”

        Me after school, Warsaw, 1977. Nostalgic as hell for that era.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I thought that was what I said.

        I was corroborating that portion of what you originally said, though I didn’t agree with what sounded like Communism getting overt credit for preventing in the East what has occurred in the West.

        Anyway, “fucked up” is relative. I say queuing up for bread-lines is better than white whores chasing beads from niggers at Mardi Gras.

        No question… but I’d argue that, while bread-lines (and other goods-lines) are an integral result of Communism, our current Babylon West need not invariably be the result of Capitalism…

        … it’s merely that, somewhere along the line, we allowed an Other to insinuate itself into MSM organs that make up a more potent weapon than any nuke, in that they slowly boil the frogs of our youths’ minds.

        Like

  8. Cesare says:

    Like them or not, I and II were both fighter pilots, I being a combat pilot. Jeb was, what again exactly?

    Like

    • Emil says:

      George W took the training and, with his family connections, was able to secure a slot in the Alabama Air National Guard in order to avoid assignment to Viet Nam. He rarely showed up for his weekend duty or summer camp, which made him legally AWOL, but was never court-martialed or otherwise disciplined. Worse, in a way, than Clinton’s dodge, since combat pilot training is a major investment.

      Like

    • jez says:

      I: combat pilot.
      II: fighter pilot who carefully avoided any fighting.
      Jeb: once made a paper plane.

      Like

  9. OT: Shitlord of The Week

    How long will he keep his job?

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Heh, heh… “It’s not about race!”

      Merely a cohencidence that 90+% of the miscreants had hair that a komondor would envy, if said species came in darker varieties. lzolozl

      A for effort, though.

      Like

      • Sentient says:

        He he the Puli…

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well-done, Sentient… I thought there was another species that came in coal black, I just couldn’t think of it at the time.

        Perhaps it was its absence at the recent Westminster show, although I did leave the room a few times. 😉

        Like

      • PA says:

        “It’s not about race!”

        Yeah, it deflates all that came before.

        Shitlord still. The anger is building and coalescing. Sharp us vs them lines are forming. Soon enough clarity will build and we’ll all dispense with the old bromides.

        Like

      • PA says:

        “It’s not about race!”

        Yeah, it deflates all that came before.

        Shitlord still. Anger is building and coalescing. Sharp us vs them lines are forming. Soon enough clarity will build and we’ll all dispense with the old bromides and with false “we.”

        Like

      • Laguna Beach Fogey says:

        “It’s not about race!”

        When they say that hey’re not trying to convince anyone else; they’re trying to convince themselves.

        We’re closer to a breakthrough every day.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I don’t think he’s trying to convince himself… if anyone knows the score on race, it’s police.

        He’s just covering his azz… understandably.

        Like

      • Big-Al says:

        Especially the police in Louisiana. They know plenty about it there

        Like

    • This is why I love Louisiana. (New Orleans and Baton Rouge excepted.)

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      this guy has a healthy pair, but it’s bad strategy. sure he can defend himself, but can he protect his family, friends, and children 24/7? those thug punks won’t come after him, but they WILL come after his daughter in between classes, or his mom while she’s out running errands. hope he gave that some consideration before putting all their lives on the line….

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Can’t worry about that, otherwise nobody would try to stop them.

        All one can do is hope for God’s protection and the fact that, should anything like that occur, the entire law-enforcement machine of the state, and possibly the nation, will be on the heels of the miscreants.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        @GE: “will be on the heels of the miscreants”
        let’s hope so, GE. personally i think this old-fashioned john wayne-type strategy is outdated. poison, drone-strikes, anthrax, snipers, arson could get the job done more effectively while protecting his family and saving the justice/law enforcement system lives and money.

        the gloves need to come off, once and for all. this isn’t just about winning. it’s about extermination

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        You could be right, but under the current conditions, they’d sooner use those tactics against us wrong-thinkers than the gang-bangers.

        Like

      • Hugo Stiglitz says:

        @plumpjack “… but they WILL come after his daughter in between classes…”

        Doubtful. That video looks to me to be thinly veiled propaganda psa telling these poor lost youts that the police will act as a deathsquad (if need be) and they have the backing of the community.

        ” Fuck around, we will kill you. Nobody will care.”

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        ”Fuck around, we will kill you. Nobody will care.”

        he could’ve done that without using himself as a billboard. in fact, he could’ve just skipped the PSA entirely and proceeded with the killing. what good does a PSA do at this point? these thugs are too stupid to be intimidated. maybe it’s a rallying cry, but bravado doesn’t do that nowadays the way sympathy does. starving children and lil old ladies are what incite peoples’ emotions nowadays.

        learn from your enemies. this is how you get you use the media to incite a war against your adversary:

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        plumpjack, that sort of agitprop doesn’t hold as much weight as it used to…

        … it only works on those who don’t come in contact with dindus… a rapidly-shrinking demographic…

        … and it just makes those racially-aware hold the apparatchiks in even greater disdain.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        @GE “that sort of agitprop doesn’t hold as much weight as it used to…”

        i think it seems that way to you and i because we see right through it, but the average tube-watcher eats that shit right up. guys like you and the guys on this site are a small small minority

        it’s a good video and it made me proud, but the pride-and-honor message is the bug in the white code and it’s the reason why we’re losing. this excellent, brave man is putting himself on the line for a small skirmish without realizing that the real war is the CULTURE WAR, which we’re losing BADLY. that war is fought in the media. he doesn’t get that. if he or his wife get taken out tomorrow it wouldn’t make half the media splash that seeing a small white child with her leg shot off by some thug would

        I have yet to see law enforcement use the media to their advantage. they get trapped by their own honesty. their pride and honor is always front and center, like a giant bullseye waiting to be picked off (like the guys in Oregon) it’s an outdated model and one that we’ll all pay the ultimate price for if they don’t knock it off. this is war, and war calls for knowing thy enemy.

        the times call for underhanded tactics like tooling people’s emotions. maybe the agitprop of BLM seems trite, but guess what? it’s worked amazingly well. yes, it’s manipulative but that’s exactly why it works. if law enforcement wants to win this war then they need to start taking notes from gays, BLM, feminîsts, eskimos. all the groups that know precisely how to shape public opinion in order to further their agenda. they need to stop acting like boy scouts and hire their own PR firms to keep the media working in their favor while behind the scenes they go about exterminating the vermin.

        there are far more bullets than there are brave sheriffs. if we don’t win the media war then there’s no chance we’ll survive. the 300 all died. no thanks.

        Like

      • Big-Al says:

        Everytime I read BLM I think of the Bureau of Land Management

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Can’t argue with you on those points…

        I have the uneasy feeling that we can’t assume the enemies’ disingenuous tactics, because then we can’t look ourselves in the mirror and fight with our full spirit and strength…

        … the lion can’t adopt hyena methods without failing as a lion.

        I think the thing that ultimately assures our survival is that, if it came to that, our honor is more important than mere survival, and we’d rather go down in a blaze of glory.

        No Thermopylae, Teutoberger Wald, Chalons-sur-Marne, or Tours would ever have been fought otherwise.

        Court intrigues are for Byzantines. 😉

        Like

      • Hugo Stiglitz says:

        @plumpjack

        “the times call for underhanded tactics like tooling people’s emotions. maybe the agitprop of BLM seems trite, but guess what? it’s worked amazingly well. yes, it’s manipulative but that’s exactly why it works.”

        The police have been using the ‘officer friendly’ approach since film began. The video above is entirely new. The BLM snivel fest only works for the people who don’t have to live it. White liberals.

        Poor people have now witnessed what happens when you allow the feral to control the streets. You get Ferguson and Baltimore. They will inevitably choose order over El Salvadorean – style chaos.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “our honor is more important than mere survival”

        can’t honor and ruthlessness go together?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        They can, when done in a noble cause.

        But I don’t think I was disputing ruthless action… merely disingenuous and underhanded, in the vein of our Cathedral adversaries.

        Like

    • jOHN MOSBY says:

      The cop in the video has been doing this for a while. He’s a no bullshit guy, and I so enjoy hearing his Crime Stoppers reports.

      Like

  10. elmertjones says:

    Photo looks like it was taken at a Corleone wedding.

    Like

  11. Charles&Friends says:

    Completely unrelated to this post…

    Australian police are finally waking up to reality:
    http://tinyurl.com/gpusu4g

    Like

  12. dude says:

    i think LBJ, Kennedy, and Lincoln were much worse than W.

    Like

    • Edward Waverley says:

      Agreed. And Woodrow Wilson (for WWI and Federal Reserve) and FDR (for WWII and New Deal) also deserve more derision than W. But W was also horrible (lying to justify Iraq, Islam a religion of peace, denouncing Arab-focused profiling, NSA, Patriot Act, and pretty much engineering the Mex-fueled housing bubble/collapse/bailouts).

      Like

      • Nads says:

        I have always had an issue with the “Bush lied” mantra. If he was lying, he was in good company. CIA, DOD, British intelligence, French intelligence, the UN all thought he WMD. Every credible source said the Iraqis had them. Then there is the abundance of troops who have symptoms related to chemical exposure. Not to mention the various reports of discovered stockpiles throughout the country.

        GWB made enough mistakes without having to dump that charge on the man.

        Like

      • Dude says:

        i believe sadaam used gas/chems on iran etc so saying there were no wmd is naive. Also, the CRA which fueled the housing crisis was erected before W was in office. I think it was slick willy who put it into high gear. But i think also that started before clinton, maybe back in the 70’s. W tried to get welfare reform etc and went before congress on trying to do it but the commies weren’t having any of that. I also think that the war in Iraq was a good idea if obungler wouldn’t have tossed the victory aside and pulled out. W created a battlespace in iraq where thousands of little jihadis came to die. The US would’ve had a deep water port/base in the middle east and we would not be seeing the shenanigans from isis/iran/whomever.

        Like

    • Hugo Stiglitz says:

      “I have always had an issue with the “Bush lied” mantra. If he was lying, he was in good company”

      Of course he was lying. War is about deceit and terror. Nothing else.

      I have no problem with Bush lying his ass off , or bombing the fuck out of people. My only beef with him was the interventionism and nation – building.

      Like

    • The Other Jim says:

      James Buchanan was the worst US president by far. Even as a pro-Confederacy guy, not only did his pussy equivocation lead to the Civil War, but it was likely that it was he, not Bathhouse Barry that was our first faggot president.

      Barry is clearly the 2nd worst with real potential in his last year to surpass Buchanan.

      Like

  13. Nads says:

    End of the dynasty?

    Isn’t jebe’s son getting into politics?

    Like

  14. YIH says:

    Blast from the past: Poppy holding up Junior’s bag o’ blow

    Like

  15. Glengarry says:

    Paulie, Fredo and the Don.

    Like

  16. Ripp says:

    ¡jeb! legs crossed inward with unbalanced clumsy posture. and the whiny “buhhht whhyyyy?” gesture.

    complete tool.

    Like

  17. Meet the Shitlibs says:

    Sitting at a shop drinking coffee and reading Trump’s new book.

    Morbidly obese dude and HB3 chick in shitlib glasses sit across from me and I overhear them start ripping Trump, so I think I’ll give them the book when I leave.

    Probably won’t make a difference. Shitlibs gonna shitlib.

    Like

  18. Stationarity says:

    W. worse than LBJ, FDR, Grant, and Harding?

    Like

  19. A few comments.about the Bushes

    1. Will Jeb Bush’s crash and burn end the career of George P. Bush, his son? If the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, one hopes so. Regression even further towards the mean?

    2. Both George H.W. and Dubya flew military aircraft. In the case of Bush 41 he flew close enough to the enemy to be shot down. The other two members of his crew were killed and bobbed around on a liferaft until an American submarine picked him up. So I give him lots of credit for that service. Dubya flew the F-102, the first U.S. production delta-winged aircraft. It was underpowered and not easy to fly. He flew it–give credit where credit is due.

    3. Both Bush 41 and Bush 43 missed colossal opportunities. In the case of Bush 41, when the USSR collapsed, he could have withdrawn the U.S. from NATO and told the Europeans that if they can’t deal with Russia without North American help after 300 years (dating from Peter the Great) they never will. Instead, he began a process of pushing NATO to rhe doorsep of Russia.

    4. In the case of Bush 43 September 11 was a great opportunity to dramatically restrict or forbid Muslim immigration into the U.S. and possibly even encourage the emmigration of those already here. Instead he started two pointless unwinnable wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    5. I wonder if Jeb is a victim of the Peter Principle. He seems to have been a reasonably competent governor of Florida but he has been totally out of his depth running for President.

    Like

    • whorefinder says:

      !Jeb! will run for senator from Florida.

      Like

      • Diversity Heretic says:

        As a backbench Republican party apparatchik Senator, he might actually perform a useful service in voting for measures that genuine American leaders sponsor. A nation and a legislature need good followers.

        Like

    • jackmcg says:

      #4, an amazing point.

      Immediately after 9/11, Bush’s approval ratings shot over 90%, unprecedented. Had he simply said “For our national security, we’re instituting a freeze in our immigration and visa process. At times like these, the safety of the American people should be our primary concern.”

      Who could have opposed? Some, but he’d definitely have a slam-dunk majority supporting him, at least 70% of the people.

      Then you just don’t lift the freeze, or gradually lift it for “safe” countries first, aka White people.

      That’s how an immigration patriot Bush presidency could have gone. A crisis gone to waste…

      Like

    • In fairness to Bush 41, I believe he was sincere in his guarantee to the Russians that in exchange for German reunification NATO would advance no further. Even Nixon, an expert Russia watcher, in the volumes Monica Crowley wrote as his amanuensis, fumed against Bush for backing Gorbachev instead of Yeltsin. It looks to me that Bush had the better of that argument (tho Nixon, to his credit, implored Clinton to extend aid to the Russians instead of screwing them over).

      It’s not as good as vacating NATO, but I think Bush’s prudential attitude would’ve allowed some multipolarity and breathing room for Russia. Also, his victory address before Congress as the Gulf War ended laid out a strongly anti-interventionist agenda for the Middle East, deploring any sort of permanent presence– and, like Carter before him, Bush dedicated a lot of political capital to forcing a peace settlement on Israel, which surely helped ruin his reelection.

      Otoh: legal immigration first shot to 1,000,000+ numbers on Bush’s watch. This and NAFTA, much more than any bullshit about tax deals, was his true sin against conservatism, and I don’t know what it would’ve taken to convince him to do otherwise.

      Bush 41 was the president of my high school years, and I still find it hard to shake my affection for the man. John “Normanson” Podhoretz wrote a very hateful book about the Bush 41 presidency, which includes various chapters in the “voice” of fellow apparatchiks of the White House, a couple of which betray an extraordinary degree of affection for Bush. I haven’t picked up that book in years, but it would be interesting to revisit it to see what role Eskimo prejudices played against the country club paternalism of the sporting old man.

      Like

  20. ((( Rebbe Eskimovitz ))) says:

    One of the weird paradoxes post War is that the allegedly “evil Empire” communist countries were the least devastated by the Poz (China, Poland, Russia). The reason is that the Poz was foisted on the USA and Western Europe by foreign adversaries.

    Hitler, being that merciful sweet soul, spared the most dangerous Jewish intellectuals in the Frankfurt School (were the SA running low on bullets that day?). Instead, Hitler merely deployed them to the US, where exhausted WASPs let them take over the Ivies and obliterate our culture.

    Similarly, the Soviets supported the Poz to destroy our culture by funding 60s radicals. J. Edgar Hoover was all over this. Foreign adversaries saw that Jews, gays, women, blacks, could be deployed to destroy the USA through internal dissention (since our military might was unassailable). Bonus points: Obama was the protégé of just such a degenerate communist collaborator (Frank Marshall Davis).

    The take home is that “church/state” division is unworkable because foreign adversaries will encourage degeneracy. Israel has non-Pozzed Rabbi’s determine social policy (yep, its a theocracy!). They can protect their culture from foreign adversaries (Israel has no gay marriage, for example). Poland is similar with conservative Catholics calling the shots.

    Like

    • jackmcg says:

      its not some big mystery why Hitler didn’t kill the worst Jews. He wasn’t killing jews at all. The poor ones starved and caught typhoid in the camps. The rich ones survived. Nowhere near 6 million died. Had he actually enacted a policy of genocide, you better be damn sure he’d have killed the most pozzed first. But he didn’t, and he didn’t.

      Like

  21. PA says:

    Judging a presidency requires criteria. Here are mine, two, to be precise:

    1. What long-term existential impact — such as land acquisition/loss or demographic results — did his term(s) have on core Americans?

    2. Are core Americans better-off or worse-off seven years after leaving office. Not during his term(s) or immediately after, as that is biased in favor of potentially short-term-gain for long-term-loss decisions. And not much farther in the future, as a trillion butterfly effects and successor president’s will have nullified his work.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      In my naivete, and relying on soundbite MSM “info”, I always thought Clinton was cool, okay. (I was also in my early to mid teens, like I knew anything.)

      Doing research and reading all the shit he did, boy howdy did I wake up fast. The lingering effects of his crappiness are still ever present.

      Like

    • uh says:

      You’re assuming a President is the causa efficiens of demographic trends. Should be, perhaps, but isn’t. There goes 1.

      Also, there’s really no getting around blacks as “core Americans”; and blacks being an insoluble problem without reverting them to antique farm equipment, 2. falls to the old maxim impossibilium nulla obligatio est — no obligation to the impossible, an impossible thing obliges none. Returning them to the fields would or might have obviated Central American immigration.

      What I’m saying is, presidential efficacy is an illusion bequeathed to us from an age with far fewer variables at play to bring about some state of affairs. Of course, certain explicit, high-level actions by various presidents and legislators have definitely advanced demographic replacement, from Kennedy and Reagan to the little local nests of treacherous senators, mayors, councilmen, priests, etc.

      Like

      • YIH says:

        ”and blacks being an insoluble problem without reverting them to antique farm equipment”

        Obsolete farm equipment – FIFY

        Like

  22. tteclod says:

    My wife sent me an email with a graphic from our health insurer’s biometric screening. The latest assessment showed how her “health age” had dropped from 38 to 19 years old. She’s 44. She’s rediscovered the gym and runs every morning.

    She wrote, “Apparently, you traded your forty year old wife for two 20’s”

    I wrote, “That’s great! Where’s my other 20-year-old wife?”

    She replied, “I don’t know, but when I find her, I’m turning over all the housework.”

    Thank you, CH.

    Like

    • Corvo says:

      That’s awesome — sounds like you’ve got a keeper. For shits and giggles you could prank her by “hiring” a smoking hot live-in house cleaner.

      Seriously though, you know you have a good wife when you can joke about the prospect of your sleeping with other women.

      A few years ago my wife was acting up and it turned out that what was bothering her was that this friend-of-friends engaged girl she *thought* I was having an affair with (for over a year she thought this without saying anything) had recently broken off the engagement and only *then* did my wife freak out thinking that this other woman she was going to make a move to break up our marriage. Truth is that I was NOT having an affair with that girl. But it dawned on me that what my wife was communicating to me (whether intentionally or not) was that she would tolerate me having an affair so long as she didn’t have to know about it and didn’t feel threatened.

      Like

      • tteclod says:

        There’s a modest danger to that, of course, which is cold leftovers for weeks or months with no explanation, followed by anger and resentment for what you might have done in her imagination, even after she knows the truth.

        Like

    • KP says:

      I’m turning over all the housework.

      That’s exactly how they did it in Africa (or at least the parts I am familiar with.) First/older wife goes along with the husband getting a younger, hotter, tighter #2, #3, #4, etc…. BUT the younger/youngest wife gets saddled with all the domestic heavy lifting–and it’s REALLY heavy–carrying water, grinding grain on a stone mortar and pestle, etc, and the senior wife sits down and settle into the role of Matriarch Of The Homestead.

      Like

  23. whorefinder says:

    When the faggot within looks at his family photographs…

    just kidding. his family kicked him to the curb years ago.

    Faggot within rape!

    Like

  24. Corvo says:

    Well, this is — tomorrow’s SC primary election is a key moment for Der Trumpening. As I predicted a couple weeks ago, it’s really coming down to Trump v. Cruz.

    I’m a bit disappointed that Trump hasn’t capitalized on the potential for capturing the Southern race-realism vote (it would have been easy enough to do while maintaining plausible deniability for now). But what’s done is done.

    Prediction: it will be a tight election, but Trump will narrowly beat Cruz. Guac or Rubio in third place but neither really matters at this point. Rubio is fucked because of his support for immigration and based on what I’m reading the vaunted Bush war chest is nearly empty at this point and donors are (finally) abandoning the USS Jeb!

    Hang onto yer hats, fellas . . .

    Like

    • whorefinder says:

      Fuck Cruz with a hockey stick and a chimichanga. That sniveling queer is more two-faced than Janus and you can’t trust a word he says.

      If he becomes president, he won’t build a wall, won’t deport, and will basically be a slave to his donors, like any other politician not named Trump.

      If Trump doesn’t take the nod, I am literally voting for Sanders/Clinton, because I’d rather accelerate the decline into full-blown medeival Dark Ages than slow it down just slightly with the R. Only Trump’s policies could reverse it.

      Accelerate the decline rape!

      Like

    • Sentient says:

      well we shall see… I think TRUMP smokes em, 8+ points higher than a 2nd place RU-BO (he has the GOP machine behind him and will pull Christie voters) and Cruz 3rd…

      Greg is keeping score. 😉

      Like

      • Sentient says:

        If Yeb polls 4th or lower there will be a lot of pressure on him to drop out. The idiocy and hubris of the GOP are killing them, as always, the term “circular firing squad” resounding among the campaigns of Rubio Yeb and Old Krustich… Consolidate those votes and they are near TRUMP level.

        Like

      • Well, I hope Jeb’s obstinacy keeps him in long enough to keep the “moderates” and donors scratching their heads and playing musical chairs to find another patsy to back as “THE” anti-Donald. Let Trump rack up enough delegates to silence any attempt at a “brokered convention”.

        It’s divide et impera I can believe in!

        Like

      • — I meant “another patsy” as in “keep trying to find one out of the cast of losers you’ve already got”. The last thing we need now is for them to find a “fresh” appointee to drag into the race. God forbid, but some people are so stupid they might allow themselves to back an unvetted candidate as bad as Cruz, Rubio, and Kasich patently are.

        I should almost be ashamed to repeat this, but I overheard my poor fool of a stepfather on the phone, blindly regurgitating some nonsense he heard from Fuchs News, say, “That old, uh, Kasich from Ohio, he might wind up and get it!” lzozlzzolzolz

        Well, let the rubes and the CoC keep telling themselves that drivel, and keep trying to decide if it’s Cruz or Rubio or Kasich or, uh, Jeb! who can solve their little problem . . . .

        Now the Dems– Mark Warner was a damned fool not to just wait out the mandated absent term and run again for VA governor. Even with his lack of easy charisma, he could’ve sailed into something like this Clinton-Sanders miasma as a savior for the Democrats (though probably they don’t want one who’s essentially no more liberal than a ’96 Bill Clinton). The temptation of a Senate seat has undone a number of potential Presidential careers.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Ach, conflicting info again… some polls still have Trump as a 2:1 easy win or at least more than 30% to his closest rival’s less-than-20%…

      But now more rumblings on how it’s going to be a “close race”, which given the shennanigans of the MSM and voting mechanisms, always gives me the heebie-jeebies… literally.

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      If Trump only “narrowly beats out” Cruz, then that’s a victory for the Cathedral, seeing as how Trump supposedly had an insurmountable 2:1 lead over the past few weeks.

      Sigh. 😡

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Okay, let’s talk turkey then:

      Corvo, given the overwhelming mass of poll data presented by Sentient’s link, where do you get your prediction of Trump “narrowly” defeating Cruz?

      Inside info, or will you be eating crow, Corvo? (pun intended)

      Like

      • Corvo says:

        It’s a gut prediction based on my (admittedly minimal and sporadic) review of this week’s polling data and my sense of where the religious Repulican voters are aligned from conversations with family members.

        If Trump wins narrowly in SC that is not a victory for the Cathedral! If Trump wins SC it will be HUGE for Trump and will show he can and likely will win the nomination.

        The entire Republican establishment is against him; Cuckservative Review put out a special edition “Against Trump”; libtards are calling him Hitler reincarnated; the fucking Pope — the fucking anti-Pope who said fuck all about Obama not being Christian because he supports dismembering babies on operating room tables after botched abortion — the fucking Pope comes out against Trump for daring to protect our borders; the banksters and the cheap labor lobby are in overdrive to get anyone-but-Trump elected; fucking Obama — the sitting president — taking the unprecedented step of picking sides in the opposition party’s primary, flapping his lips making anti-Trump remarks; and of course, Eskimos under every rock from here to Tel Aviv bashing Trump.

        If Trump wins in SC in the face of all of this, it’s a major win no matter the margin. Even if he places a close second, it’s not over — there is untapped pro-White votes that he can win in subsequent states if he adopts the Corvo “accidental racist” 😉 strategy.

        “Trump: I Carry”
        “Trump: ALL Lives Matter”
        “Trump: Our Country – Our Wall”

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        I posted a long response, lost to the fucking mod . . .

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        Bottom line: it’s mainly a gut prediction. If Trump wins even narrowly it’s a HUGE win over pretty much every Cathedral power center that’s come out against Trump and bodes very well for Trump winning the nomination.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well, I can’t agree… he’s got to do better than a narrow margin for it to be a huge victory.

        According to the consensus of polls, if Trump draws anything less than 30%, it’s a bit of a comedown.

        And if he only beats Cruz by 2% or 3%, it’s actually a BIG letdown.

        Truth be told, my friend… when a man has for all seeming intents and purposes a very large lead, but someone chimes in and says he’ll only narrowly defeat his opponent, that person sounds more like a Cathedral shill.

        No offense, but “gut” reactions of this sort are hard to stomach.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Of course, we’ll still have dustydog to kick around… he of the “Trump finishes in 5th place in SC” shillery. 😉

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        “when a man has for all seeming intents and purposes a very large lead, but someone chimes in and says he’ll only narrowly defeat his opponent, that person sounds more like a Cathedral shill.”

        There is no “lead” yet — there are only polls. And you’ll recall how disappointed some folks were when the polls turned out to be wrong in Iowa. 😉

        Don’t fall for the “Trump HAS to win big or he’s a big fat LOSER” — that, my friend, is shilling for the Cathedral. Who said winning against every entrenched interest of the SJW and cheap labor lobby was going to be easy? Fight like a White man.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        There is no “lead” yet — there are only polls. And you’ll recall how disappointed some folks were when the polls turned out to be wrong in Iowa. 😉

        Let’s not quibble over semantics… indeed, fight like a White man. 😡

        And I’m not sure the polls were wrong in Iowa… it was only the chateau rah-rah section that overestimated.

        Don’t fall for the “Trump HAS to win big or he’s a big fat LOSER” — that, my friend, is shilling for the Cathedral.

        Don’t put words in anyone’s mouth… the fact remains, when nearly every non-MSM poll has Trump at over 30% to the next guy’s 18%, anything close will turn out to be a disappointment, and either a harbinger of decline, or a Giant-Ass Tell that NOTHING coming out of any polls is reliable info.

        Who said winning against every entrenched interest of the SJW and cheap labor lobby was going to be easy? Fight like a White man.

        Who said anything about the big picture at all… we’re talking the task at hand, tomorrow’s SC primary. It seems like you’re squid-inking now to make up for your unwarranted “gut” feelings.

        Predicting merely a “narrow victory” for Trump is what the MSM attempts, in the face of much larger margins from nearly every other source… and even they have him ahead by 5%, which isn’t really all that narrow, in so large a field… but looks narrow compared to the 15% leads predicted by others.

        Like

        Let’s not quibble over semantics… indeed, fight like a White man. 😡

        And I’m not sure the polls were wrong in Iowa… it was only the chateau rah-rah section that overestimated.

        Don’t fall for the “Trump HAS to win big or he’s a big fat LOSER” — that, my friend, is shilling for the Cathedral.

        Don’t put words in anyone’s mouth… the fact remains, when nearly every non-MSM poll has Trump at over 30% to the next guy’s 18%, anything close will turn out to be a disappointment, and either a harbinger of decline, or a Giant-Ass Tell that NOTHING coming out of any polls is reliable info.

        Who said winning against every entrenched interest of the SJW and cheap labor lobby was going to be easy? Fight like a White man.

        Who said anything about the big picture at all… we’re talking the task at hand, tomorrow’s SC primary. It seems like you’re squid-inking now to make up for your unwarranted “gut” feelings.

        Predicting merely a “narrow victory” for Trump is what the MSM attempts, in the face of much larger margins from nearly every other source… and even they have him ahead by 5%, which isn’t really all that narrow, in so large a field… but looks narrow compared to the 15% leads predicted by others.

        Like

        Don’t put words in anyone’s mouth… the fact remains, when nearly every non-MSM poll has Trump at over 30% to the next guy’s 18%, anything close will turn out to be a disappointment, and either a harbinger of decline, or a Giant-Ass Tell that NOTHING coming out of any polls is reliable info.

        Who said winning against every entrenched interest of the SJW and cheap labor lobby was going to be easy? Fight like a White man.

        Who said anything about the big picture at all… we’re talking the task at hand, tomorrow’s SC primary. It seems like you’re squid-inking now to make up for your unwarranted “gut” feelings.

        Predicting merely a “narrow victory” for Trump is what the MSM attempts, in the face of much larger margins from nearly every other source… and even they have him ahead by 5%, which isn’t really all that narrow, in so large a field… but looks narrow compared to the 15% leads predicted by others.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Aw, hell… compounding those blockquotes always seems to backfire on me. 😡

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Let’s really talk some turkey… this is all about delegates. 1237 are required for nomination of 2472. 50 are at stake here in SC (see http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/SC-R )

        Trump has 17 delegates at the moment, Cruz 11 and Rubio 10…

        Trump could come out of this and NV (30 delegates) with 35+ additional delegates and be in a great lead.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Everyone has on off day from time to time, GE.

        In some ways, gives off a hypnotic, poetry quality to it.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well, for all the previous talk in recent threads of carrying momentum into Super Tuesday, suddenly merely eking out a victory over Cruz in SC doesn’t really blow wind up one’s skirt.

        /Jes’ Sayin’ Rape!

        That said, obviously any increase of delegate lead will help to stifle some of the snotty MSM…

        … which is nothing to sneeze at.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Every time I hear “delegates”, this comes to mind:

        Not sure if Rubes or Jebes is Jar Jar in real life.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Greg – you need to understand that the delegates are not awarded on a straight proportion of the popular vote acheived, some states are winner take all, some require a minimum hurdle (20% of the vote) to get any votes, most have special or super delegate blocks that are awarded to overall winners etc… Really this is all that matters. The media can circle jerk all day long on narrow or wide victories, it’s delegates that get the nomination.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Some irony – background of SC Primary (wikipedia)

        “Historically, this primary election has been much more important in the Republican Party’s nomination process, considered a “firewall” that would permanently eliminate any/all serious rivals to the front-runner. It was designed to stop the momentum of any insurgent candidate(s) who threatened to catch or overtake the Republican establishment’s preferred choice to win the nomination, especially those who had strong showings in the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries.[1][2] It is meant to force the various factions of the party to decide quickly on and unite behind a single candidate and avoid wasting precious time and resources on a drawn-out battle between their own candidates, that would divert the party’s focus from working to defeat the Democrats’ likely nominee.

        Since its 1980 inception, the winner of the Republican South Carolina primary has always become the eventual Republican National Convention nominee for that fall’s general election,[3] with one exception, the 2012 primary, in which eventual Republican nominee Mitt Romney finished second, behind winner Newt Gingrich (who would go on to suspend his campaign before that summer’s convention began).”

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Obviously nobody is going to remember, weeks from now, how wide any margins of victory were in earlier primaries.

        But that isn’t the point here at the moment…

        The point is, when one side is predicted to have a resounding margin of victory, but only ekes out a win, there’s a bit of a pall over the result for the immediate aftermath… like when your team doesn’t cover the spread, and, although they won, you still lost some money.

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        “And I’m not sure the polls were wrong in Iowa… it was only the chateau rah-rah section that overestimated.”

        Final pre-Iowa polls all predicted aTrump victory — I didn’t see a single poll that had Cruz ahead. It wasn’t just the CH rah-rah section.

        As for “the task at hand” — every one of these interests is laser-focused on taking Trump down in SC. You can’t, in my opinion, divorce the battle in SC from the larger picture.

        I see the MSM game differently than you do. I see them looking to overplay Trump’s “lead” and then pump up whoever “beats expectations” as the Big Winner of SC, while Trump is a loser if he doesn’t meet overhyped expectations.

        You’re in PA, a swing state — have YOU every been contacted by a pollster? Would you trust any of them as far as you could kick them? Polls are somewhat useful but need to be taken with a very big grain of salt.

        As for putting words in your mouth, my rayciss, you didn’t use the word “loser” but you’re using a whole slew of synonyms (“BIG letdown,” “disappointment,” “harbinger of decline”). That’s the Cathedral narrative — Trump has to beat everyone by 10+ points or he’s just not the real thing. Bullshit. A win is a fucking win.

        I predicted NH would be closer than it turned out to be — I was glad to be proven wrong and I would be glad to be proven wrong again tomorrow. My predictions are worth exactly what I’m paid to provide them. You can call me wrong but don’t call me a fucking Cathedral shill.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well, to send a volley back, you stated a narrow victory over Cruz would be a HUGE win… and if the MSM game is to overplay Trump’s leads so they can neener-neener lesser results, then by your own logic, it’s not a HUGE win.

        That said, it’s an interesting point you bring up about that MSM gambit… yet I think you’re giving them too much credit, as we’ve seen in the NH results… still, an interesting point, and shame on me if I’ve fallen for it.

        We’ll see what happens tomorrow… mah rayciss! 😉

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I see now the Opinion Savvy scheisters have “surged” Rubio to within 3% of The Donald at this, the Eleventh Hour.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Back on the delegate issue – Trump’s loss in IA was a net 1 delegate 7 for Trump to Cruz the VICTORS 8…. 1 delegate that Cruz stole with his underhanded tactics in the 11 hour and 59th minute…

        In NH TRUMP claimed 10 to Krustich’s 4 while RU-BO, Cruz and Bush all got 3…

        The winner in each race is going to grab about 40-50% of the delegates… No matter what the margin of victory is. IA is an outlier in how they run things and how delegates are counted, which is WHY it has always been a poor predictor of the nominee.

        Tomorrow we will all know more…

        PS – have heard a strong rumor that Jeb is about out of money…

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Smelling the crow pies all the way here… Trump called the winner plus 9…

        And hour in..38 delgates in the bag.

        Heil the TRUMPening.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I tuned into one of the major networks for the report… they were absolutely mum right until the polls closed, but there were all sorts of smiles and talk of “all of the polls have never been wrong before”, so a sense of dread arose, as if the fix was in.

        At 7:00pm, they kept up the “too close to call” between Trump, Cruz, and Rubio… blah-blah-blah, exit polls, blah-blah-blah…

        But by 7:20 they couldn’t keep up the facade any longer and declared Trump the victor… and not by a little, either… so they started touting the “fight for second place” between the next two guys at the 22% mark… heh.

        So, Trump not only won handily, he covered the spread.

        Where are you, dustydog? You off getting sterilized, you snarky pismire?

        C’mere and get one in the yarbles, if’n ya got any, eunuch jelly thou!

        C’mere so’s I kin knock the black feathers outta your flapping yap.

        The next time one of you shills wants to come to the chateau and talk about what’s going to happen in a primary, you’d better be holding your hat in your hand and speaking in a respectful voice.

        Like

    • jackmcg says:

      Its not Trump vs. Cruz, it is Trump vs. Rubio.

      Cruz has no path to win a GOP nomination. He is for the evangelical, very conservative voters. No play in the North or the coasts. Can’t win.

      You’ll see after the establishment consolidates around someone (probably Rubio), that candidate will quickly overtake Cruz in the polls.

      The only Cruz factor in this race is that he’s siphoning delegates away from Trump and needs to be killed before he gets too many. That’s it.

      Like

      • Corvo says:

        In SC, it’s Trump v. Cruz. I agree Cruz has weak appeal outside of the South, but for now he’s the biggest threat to a Trumpening in SC.

        Like

  25. Tom says:

    Bej! posted a pic of his personalized handgun the other day. I was reminded of a hamster with a gang tattoo.

    Like

  26. PA says:

    Check out that Stephanie tweet. Dad threatens his mudshark daughter with disowning. She tweets the letter saying more or less that “racissss so sad it’s the current year.” Thank God I have sons, no daughters.

    Like

    • uh says:

      Heh, dad really spells out his contempt for miscegenation. Excellent.

      Like

    • mendo says:

      I checked that out and saw the all the people supporting her. There was even another girl that disowned her dad, for other reasons, and was glad she did.

      Fucking parenting failure all the way.

      Love how the dad had the suitcases on the ready and where she could find them.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Seemed like the people supporting her were invariably snarky muh-dikking n1ggers (surprise, surprise) and/or other lost girls anyway.

        Like

    • Corvo says:

      That warrants an applause from fathers everywhere.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Exactly… people forget that, back in the day, banning and shunning wasn’t just for outsiders.

        Community integrity demanded that it be applied to one’s own family, if need be.

        Like

  27. Sentient says:

    Jeb Bush just got contact lenses and got rid of the glasses. He wants to look cool, but it’s far too late. 1% in Nevada!

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 17, 2016

    He he he TRUMP still tweaking Jeb, just for kicks… LOL

    Like

  28. Too easy to just say Jeb is and always was a beta, and now dissappointing. Maybe he had more compassion and so how abusively slimy his family and elders were, which would have made him a target to control him, thus spoiling any alpha potential. The caption could read, “But do we have to fuck over America to be successful?” What Jeb is today does not prove what he was then or earlier. I don’t see how in a powerful family like that he is Fredo, a fictional character. I don’t see how a successful governor can suck as a presidential candidate. I think there is more to the story.

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      Indeed… something more… or moor?

      Like

      • Sentient says:

        I mean if you saw this captioned President of Mexico and family, you wouldn’t blink….

        Like

      • Rob says:

        The elder son doesn’t look like someone who has a white Anglo parent. Hmm…you don’t suppose…?

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Yeah, he darker than a muthafucka

        Like

      • Suburban_elk says:

        For all his problems, and i hate him (and them) as much as anyone, they look like a loving family, how they sit close to each other and touching.

        On a previous thread was that picture of Rubio and his gaudy wife and their kids, and someone pointed out that not even one of them was touching another … except the dog.

        How unnatural was that (Rubio family) picture – and then to think that it was a staged photo, and none of them nor their handlers could notice and correct it, and maybe make them look like non-sociopaths or at least a halfway functional fam.

        Like

      • I hope H. W. and Boehner cry each other to sleep over the phone each night. But how the fuck does the Bush family go from oil players in pre-Nazi Germany to this? Maybe the elite can’t help but to raise their children more and more like they dumb down useful idiots and tax units. It is a somewhat incredible failure of parenting with every advantage imaginable.

        Like

      • Suburban_elk says:

        The elder son doesn’t look like someone who has a white Anglo parent. Hmm…you don’t suppose…?

        No, he’s dark but the Bush bone structure can be seen in his (admittedly handsome) face.

        It’s how that works in the race-mixing Chinese pinball machine.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        No doubt about it… that fruit didn’t fall fall from the tree… and yes, they do look like a loving family, so there’s that.

        Truth be told, I’d rather live among the Hispanics than negroes… even the roughest looking dudes around here hold the door for the next guy and still say “thank you”… as well as having a modicum of fear for the Lord.

        Can’t say that about the dindus, more’s the pity.

        Like

      • The one kid is darker than we would suppose meimosis could support. He has her face and, I think, his hair and forehead.

        @Suburban_elk, great observation. I would even say !Jeb looks ‘alpha’ with his personal family (presumably only with the absence of just about all other men and plenty of liberated women).

        Is it possible that Jeb is or was a believing shitlib and wanted to defy the Bush elders? or simply be more comfortable living his convictions?

        You almost forget she is a tall as a garden gnome. He must feel like such a hulk stud when alone with his family. In Mexico, being tall is being alpha. Shows generational superiority in securing adequate food.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I remember that “little brown ones” tempest in a teapot… some of the MSM tried to invoke the RAY-CIS card, but it petered out.

        Heh, heh… at the time I assumed the “little brown ones” were adopted.

        Like

      • Reb says:

        Gross looking family right thar

        Like

      • lcs says:

        Trump vs Jeb, the way we’d like to see it:
        http://www.tubechop.com/watch/7711028

        Like

    • Suburban_elk says:

      The caption could read, “But do we have to fuck over America to be successful?”

      Hahahaha

      Like

  29. uh says:

    OT

    Post office. Tiny, straight off the bog Irish girl walking my way, big blue eyes, freckles all over, curvy 20-sthg bod, skirt and lacy tank-top … and actually barefoot.

    “Is that allowed here?”, I say. She immediately starts yammering cheerfully about being in heels all day, etc. Banter.

    She switches, asks why she keeps getting junk mail and hands me a piece with her name on it. I say thanks, now I can stalk you.Tingles evident.

    Has a boyfriend. Conversation goes on, and pretty soon she’s asking if I got any of my tattoos in prison. Roll up sleeve, this one. Eyes widen, skin flushes a little.

    We say goodbye in an overtly flirty way, she looks at me as she walks to her car while I’m in line.

    I go out to my car and put her name into Google. She’s naive enough to have put her number on her Plus profile. I text, “See what you can do with a name?”

    Go on for a bit, discover that I used to creep on her high school friends about five years ago at a local coffee shop/venue. She loves it but says, “I have to stop now. My boyfriend will be really angry if he finds these texts.”

    I text a sad Pusheen saying “OK”.

    Amazed by how natural it was, how they are constantly flirting around at the edge of loyalty, and how worthless it all is.

    Like

    • Suburban_elk says:

      that’s mad game but

      barefoot and bog irish at the post office = red flag ^ 2

      Like

      • uh says:

        Thanks. She was red-flaggin’ all over, that’s why I just gave up. I can’t chase something that doesn’t understand junk mail.

        Like

    • jackmcg says:

      “maybe you should find a more trusting boyfriend” was the boyfriend-destroyer response, but thanks for playing.

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      final text: “not a problem. any interest in having sex?”

      not joking. try it and see. you might be surprised by what follows, either immediately or down the road.

      Like

  30. Rob says:

    GHWB didn’t act alpha at the political level. He was the proto-cuck who paved the way for the present GOP meltdown. At the personal level, he did have a patrician stiff-upper-lip look about him.

    Like

  31. Photoshop job, and a piss poor one at that.

    Like

  32. To CH and professional heartists,

    Can you offer a solid alpha mantra (short powerful) that I could repeat everytime I feel like my inner game, behavior, thoughts, value is being destabilized by my environments or my own emotional faggotery?

    Do you think that something like “I am the creator of my success” is good?
    And if you could do a special post on mindset training I’d really appreciate it.

    Like

    • douchebagdeluxe says:

      Mindset and inner game training

      Like

    • Sentient says:

      Two come to mind…

      first are you pursuing the Platinum Rule [Do whatever you want to do whenever you want to do it!]? Align your thinking with that.

      Second – are you living a dynamic, passionate and authentic life? All Alpha can be boiled back down to those three traits…

      Like

      • douchebagdeluxe says:

        “are you living a dynamic, passionate and authentic life? All Alpha can be boiled back down to those three traits…”

        I’ve been falling down the existentialist rabbit hole for a couple of weeks/months now over this question. I am a dilettante and have been my entire life. Have no idea what I am doing with my life. And have no idea how to find the answers I am looking for.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Just set about living YOUR life then… dynamic! passionate! and authentic!!

        There is no more mystery or questions to be answered… Enjoy

        Like

    • uh says:

      Hahaha, yea that’s good if you’re Annette Bening in American Beauty.

      My friends and I did well with BE THAT CHIMP. It’s short and primal. Be that chimp that goes out and bashes other chimps to get to the poon.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Great droll reference to that otherwise odious movie. +1

        Like

      • uh says:

        Thanks buddy.

        douchebagdeluxe,

        I think we are similar. Your options are securing a niche in a dying culture as soon as possible, or opting out. Either way, save some money and buy land somewhere. Maine, Wyoming, Hungary, Colombia, the fucking moon — eminent domain can steal it from you, but until it comes to that, you will be grounded. If wealth isn’t in your future, acquaint yourself with the soil.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Well, at the risk of sounding obvious, the short mantra that always works for me, when facing just about ANY unfamiliar (hence somewhat daunting) task, is “Approach It Boldly”.

      Works for everything from approaching dames to swapping out your own home’s water heate, single-handedly. 😉

      Like

    • KP says:

      ABE.

      Like

    • quixotic says:

      “(He) Who Dares, Wins”

      “Fuck it” – my personal favorite lol

      “Dont think, just jump” (used to prepare for sky diving; good alternate “Dont think, just do it”

      “Better to ask forgiveness than permission”

      “Pain is not my enemy”

      “What you don’t ask for in this world, you don’t get”

      “I control my emotions, my emotions don’t control me”

      “Always be closing”

      “Women wait, men move”

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “impress me”

        Like

      • uh says:

        When I was 15, my dad sent me packing to a sort of boarding school in the Blue Ridge Mountains. The place was full of weird hillbilly delinquents. By the time I left (a relative rescued me), we had all grown close, as lost boys do. But one of them was fond of saying “Suck it up and drive on,” and in spite of my aversion to his southern accent, it’s often come back to me at hard moments.

        There’s also that line Nietzsche would think of, from the great Marshal Turenne, who allegedly would say to himself:

        ” Tu trembles, carcasse, mais tu tremblerais bien plus si tu savais où je vais te mener!” (You tremble, carcass, but you’d tremble all the more if you knew where I am leading you!)

        There’s Henley’s old standby, “Invictus”:

        Out of the night that covers me,
        Black as the pit from pole to pole,
        I thank whatever gods may be
        For my unconquerable soul.

        In the fell clutch of circumstance
        I have not winced nor cried aloud.
        Under the bludgeonings of chance
        My head is bloody, but unbowed.

        Beyond this place of wrath and tears
        Looms but the Horror of the shade,
        And yet the menace of the years
        Finds and shall find me unafraid.

        It matters not how strait the gate,
        How charged with punishments the scroll,
        I am the master of my fate,
        I am the captain of my soul.

        Which helped out in jail. But then, so did trading my sandwiches for cookies & coffee.

        Like

      • uh says:

        One more: BUY THE TICKET, TAKE THE RIDE. An old friend always said that to me.

        Like

      • The Straw says:

        “suck it up and drive on” – might this have been a catholic boys boarding school?

        Like

    • quixotic says:

      Wanted to share this vid, its a dad motivating his son. The important part is you can see him teaching his son that you need to BELIEVE you are capable of doing something in order to do it. If you have negative thoughts, self-sabotage, your thoughts words and actions do not align. if you approach a girl but are secretly thinking you aren’t good enough, she will feel that through your subcommunications.

      This is why nuero-lingustic programming (NLP) works so well. The dad trains the kid to see himself succeeding at the jump, trains him to believe he can make the jump. When the kid first tries you can see the self doubt before he attempts and fails. After he internalizes that he can do, he nails that shit. If a little kid can internalize these concepts, a grown man better be able to!

      Believe in yourself and others will too

      Like

    • “Terminate . . . with extreme prejudice.”

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      > “a solid alpha mantra (short powerful)” ——— ZFG == ZERO F*CKS GIVEN. It’s difficult to explain in words, because it’s so bizarrely counterintuitive. ZFG ought to be a variant of nihilism, and yet it’s not. In fact, when done right – when you dispense with the Pretty Little Lies, and instead allow Truth Itself to be your guide in all matters, ZFG is the purest form of anti-nihilism. Again, very counterintuitive.

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Looks more like a “who gives a rat’s ass” expression to me.

      That said, with the number of pics taken each and every day of any given celebrity, I’m sure one could find several to run the gamut of super-alpha to omega-sperg.

      What was your point again?

      Like

    • Women can’t consciously know Game. He is giving a very polite “I DGAF”.

      Like

  33. CrimsonRedneck says:

    I demand a paternity test.

    Like

  34. Peak Finance says:

    Dude:

    Also the second worst President in history

    The moron tag-team fucking of the USA by Johnson + Nixon in the late 60’s early 70’s bankrupted this country in 1971, and all of the bullshit finance stuff going on, to this day, is the aftermath / fallout from this event in 1971. Johnson has done more to destroy this country, by far, then even Obama. Bush is a fucking genius compared to those two, not the second worst by far.

    Like

    • jackmcg says:

      I defend Nixon as at least a mixed bag as a president, a guy who truly “got it”, he’d be very at home in the CH comment section. Listen to the Nixon Tapes. I’ll give you that as a President he did some things that were pretty bad, closing the gold window, putting us on the petrodollar, and the price controls were all disasters, as well as the EPA and a bunch of other crap.

      But I would take another Nixon over W or Obama for sure, mostly because he knew what side he was on, and he knew damn well who the enemies were.

      LBJ on the other hand, should be mentioned as often as possible in a “worst president ever” conversation.

      Like

    • Ice says:

      Are we forgetting JImmy Carter here? Terrible president

      Like

    • astute comment, @PF.

      Like

  35. Philomathean says:

    I can’t stop thinking about tomorrow night. My emotional investment in SC is accute.

    I have oneitis for Trump.

    Like

  36. Dude says:

    trump might be on radio interview today, hugh hewitt show, starts at 3 cali time. not sure what ur station is in ur local area and i dont work for the show or anything. dude does a lot of politics and has interviewed all gop candidates multiple times already.

    Like

  37. KungPao says:

    Posting this over many threads because I need help, stat!

    I’ve gotta game question.

    I’ve been chatting up a submissive 18 year old barista. Big tits, peachy ass. She calls me Master and sir. Eager to please. That’s WHITE BUNS/WHITE OVENS status right there. Things were going swimmingly. Due to our schedules I haven’t been able to bang her yet, but she knows its coming and she’s said shes wanted it.

    Known her for a week or so.

    Then came yesterday.

    I asked her to send me a picture of her blowing me a kiss when she wishes me good morning since I would be going out to sea for the day, told her to keep it classy. Mind you, this bitch has sent me full blown nudes in the past so it’s not like I’m breaking her comfort zone.

    She doesn’t text me until the afternoon, opening with “Fuck you, you don’t mean shit to me blah blah blah” saying I’m six feet beneath her, our relationship is parasitic, how I’m simplistic and in need of an education and that if anything she should be the dominant one. A bunch of chick shit, like a monkey throwing shit at the wall to see if any insult would stick. It was a fucking novel.

    I reply:
    BORING. Sounds like you need an education in throat fucking. When you’re able to control your emotions about me, apologize for your tantrum and send what I asked for.

    She hasn’t texted back since. She’s acted up before and I’ve punished her before and she’s apologized profusely before. The only thing I regret was telling her about needing an education in throat fucking, as it was playing into her frame about education and could possibly be read as being butt hurt, which I didn’t want to convey at all. I’ve sent brutal shit like that to her before so it’s not like it was incongruous but I should have been more stern in retrospect.

    I didn’t text her at all today. I will not do so all weekend. But I do not want to lose a chick with this much promise. She’s getting a little wild, testing me to see if I’ll bend. I don’t think I bent, but I also don’t think I punished her enough, hence the silence.

    I need the PERFECT message to send her if she hasn’t texted me back by Monday. Something that will COMPEL her inner hamster to come crawling back to me, because she just HAS to know what I meant, along the lines of ‘Oh you’re one of those girls…’. Which I actually did use on her one time when she was being indifferent to me, worked like a charm.

    I have to stoke her curiosity as well as generate tingles from a defensive crouch, to adopt Heartistian turn of phrase. Gentlemen, help me do my part to save Western civilization.

    Like

  38. retrophoebia says:

    I’m surprised Jeb!’s not wearing a keyboard necktie.

    Like

  39. Major1 says:

    I’m sure someone else has weighed in on this but I didn’t read all the comments.
    No way W is the second worst president in history.
    Don’t forget about James “Peanut” Carter.

    Like

  40. Rod Berne says:

    “Downlow Soetoro” lol heartiste spitting fire.

    Like

    • Al says:

      ‘Also the second worst President in history (after Downlow Soetoro).’

      N@gga please !!

      Have some self respect.

      Like

Leave a Reply