Feed on
Posts
Comments

CH hasn’t had a Trumpening Game post in a while. Check out this video of O’Cuckly interviewing Trump yesterday about Trump’s wise decision to forego the FoxNews GOP debate moderated by the extremely biased and unprofessional shit stirrer Megyn Kelly, (skip to 14:25).

TRUMP: Don’t ask me that question because it’s an embarrassing question…… for you.

That quip was deadly. It’s what I call a micro-reframe. In a pickup situation, one would use this on a girl who asked a personal question (say, about how many girls you’ve been with) that you didn’t want to answer. The pause before unloading the “for you” coda builds a smug anticipation in the girl that her qualification attempt will soon be validated. But, like what Trump did to O’Cuckly, you unleash this explosive little reframe and she will be left speechless, wondering where you’ve been all her life.

It takes balls to pull off stuff like what Trump does on a regular basis, but if you want to date young, cute, thin girls who have lots of options, you’ll need to find your balls.

Don’t be Fox News, the betabitch who begs for love.

116 Responses to “The Trumpening Demonstrates Another Game Tactic”

  1. Southern Man says:

    The only think I know about Trump is that every time I hear him speak, it’s about something I care about.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      I had been wondering whether The Donald had his own team of Cambridge/Oxford behavioral psychologists, like what was assembled for Rafael “Ted Cruz” Cuba [via his Goldman Sachs Globo-Homo connections], but the word on the street is that The Donald is improvising almost all of this single-handedly. If so, then A) Pray for The Donald’s safety, and B) Treasure every single opportunity you have to watch The Donald work his magic. Then pray again for his safety.

      Like

    • thesickmanofeurope_com says:

      Spot on!

      The Dan and The Donald…..

      “danbilzerianIn – an age of pussified political correctness, you have to respect people who remain unfiltered”

      Like

  2. […] The Trumpening Demonstrates Another Game Tactic […]

    Like

  3. Did you see Buzzfeed’s article on Donald Trump? They actually believe that a washed-up musician “owned” Donald Trump. What do you lot think of Cher’s tweet?

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/toe-shoes



    [CH: room temperature iq cher is just parroting a shitlib talking point that was rushed to the presses by the establishment when they thought it was a winner. it wasn’t. trump wins again.]

    Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      He Cher: (1) you are still alive? (2) Let The Donald go off stage and smack the sh!t out of Megyn, like he will with ISIS, with no legal ramifications, and I am sure that she would behave and he would attend the debate. Deal? Thought not. (3) Go die already, Bono is waiting for you.

      Like

    • Aufeis says:

      “musician”
      fixed

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      great pics comparing Trump’s and Cher’s families stuck in mod:

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Cathedral shaming language is weak, no matter how must of a super star you might have been, honey…

      … and I doubt you’ve continued to help the careers of those who disrespected you.

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        isn’t it ironic and telling that cher, móther of a transgender freak, plays the fairy/homo card on Trump? (ie get him a pair of ballerina shoes)

        boy did she show her hand. bet chaz will be voting for Trump now

        Like

    • whorefinder says:

      Actually, the tweet revealed more than it intended.

      Trump is a “prima donna” in the older sense of the word—-the star of the show. The leader. Without him, the show can’t go on—and if it tries, it severely disappoints.

      In other words, the alpha of politics.

      Cher, as a “diva” (which is just a music-industry term for “prima donna”) inadvertently revealed that she believes, like we do, that Trump is the alpha-leader.

      I’m sure Cher’s panties get angry-wet every time she hears about Trump. I’ll bet the two have crossed paths more than once in life, and he’s always dominated the interaction between the two, which is both flabbergasting and quite a turn on to a diva, who is used to having everyone bow to her and proclaim her the queen.

      Cher loves Trump rape!

      Like

  4. zillanation says:

    “the milkshake overwhelmed me.”

    pfffft. what a cuck.

    can we make this trump’s theme song? “with open gates” condensed to 3 minutes, a catchy beat and walken narrating. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-Yszp3SmxE uses some of the same rapefugee footage

    Like

  5. Wrong Side of History says:

    Where would Trump rank among all-time alpha presidents?

    [CH: up there with (pre-1986 amnesty) reagan and teddy roosevelt. not quite at andrew jackson level (but we can hope).]

    Like

    • Matthew Smith says:

      @CH Andrew Jackson simply destroying the banks makes him one of America’s greatest in my opinion.

      Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      He would also rank well against pre-assassinated McKinley. McKinley won the Spanish-American war, advocated “sound money” (the gold standard) and promised that high tariffs would restore prosperity. He pushed through the passage of the “Gold Standard Act” in 1900, and surprise, surprise, was shot and killed in August 1901 by a “Polish-American” anarchist named Leon Frank Czolgosz.

      EVERY TIME! Some history on Mr. Czolgosz. Tune is up, boys, ’cause you know its coming:

      “It was later recounted that throughout his life he had never shown any interest in friendship or romantic relationships, and was bullied during his childhood by peers. He became a recluse and spent much of his time alone reading socialist and anarchist newspapers. He was impressed after hearing a speech by the political radical Emma Goldman [ESKIMO], whom he met for the first time during one of her lectures in Cleveland, Ohio in May 1901. After the lecture Czolgosz approached the speakers’ platform and asked for reading recommendations. On the afternoon of July 12, 1901 he visited her at the home of Abraham Isaak [ESKIMO], publisher of the newspaper Free Society, in Chicago and introduced himself as Fred Nieman {No man}, but Goldman was on her way to the train station. He only had enough time to explain to her about his disappointment in Cleveland’s socialists, and for Goldman to introduce him to her anarchist friends who were at the train station.”

      So, only the next month, he shoots McKinley!

      Good old Emma Goldman:

      Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Try it again –

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Actually, Abraham Isaak may have been a Mennonite, who came from Russia to the USA. About him, a devout anarchist, it was noted, “although Isaak was an ex-Mennonite, he continued to espouse many traditional Anabaptist principles such as pacifism, mutual aid and socio-economic equality that Anarchist theorists have promoted, and that Isaak believed represented the best of his own Mennonite tradition.” Basically, a good tool for the Communists, ripe for the picking.

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        So, the fellow that shot McKinley was an isolated loser, with no romantic relationships. Hmmmmm…..sounds familiar. You know all those strange school shootings – I wonder if this is how they pick their patsies to do their wet work for them. Except, over the years, they have learned a lot better at how to create umpteen degrees of separation, so that nothing can be traced back. Plus, now we have all those great ‘anti-depressants’ to spur on the brain-washed assassins.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Also Alexander Berkman. Berkman & Goldman’s first @ssassination attempt was directed at Henry Clay Frick.

        Like

      • Regular John says:

        “So, the fellow that shot McKinley was an isolated loser, with no romantic relationships. Hmmmmm…..sounds familiar.”

        This is all just a coincidence, goy.

        Like

    • Colonel Hogan says:

      Jackson has been one of my favorites for a long time. Need a good biography. Compare and contrast with his memoirs. I suspect he’d come out looking great. Although, I have noticed that mentioning Jackson as one of the best presidents annoys cucks, libs, Jews. No surprise that.

      Like

      • Philomathean says:

        Can you recommend a quality bio?

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I dunno, but Forrest McDonald just died last week. R.I.P. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forrest_McDonald

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Yeah, I’m looking for good books on all this stuff you all keep taking about.

        The ones that come to mind are the Politically Incorrect Guides.

        We need to start a CH reading list.

        Like

      • Tarl Cabot says:

        Robert Remini’s 3 volume scholarly bio is undoubtedly the best, but he has also written more accessible popular biographies. The Trump phenomenon is Jacksonian to its core- a persistent American trait that is only now beginning to dawn on the establishment. Recurrent Jacksonianism has been the American alternative to revolution. They should pray it never goes beyond that. Trump, by his own admission, is a deal-maker. If Trump fails, next comes the Trump who doesn’t make deals.

        Like

    • jackmcg says:

      Andrew Jackson literally dueled anyone that pissed him off. Sorry Trump, your alpha is limited by the conventions of the era.

      Like

  6. Johnny Redux says:

    I heard that over 7,000 people were lined up for about 700 seats to see Trump tonight. Can anyone verify that? I hope he did raise a lot of money for the veterans, and had fun doing it.

    There was no reason to appear on a debate anyhow. What more is there to debate at this point anyhow….either we make America Great Again, or it is going to sink. And, regardless of Megyn being there (which, of course, he was correct about her being a biased shill for the cuckservative establishment – why give her a chance to regroup and take another bite at him?), there are still way too many people on stage. If I were Trump, I would say, “Listen, knock it down to me, Cruz and Rubio, who are the top three. I am not going to appear on the stage with Mr. 3%, Jeb Bush, and just have you give him more air time to attack me.” Also, I do NOT trust these audiences that show up for these events. I think they are packed with cuckservative supporters, and peppered with Democrats, Leftists, and Communists (but I repeat myself) who have one mission – boo anything The Donald says to try to make him look unpopular with the masses (basic psy-ops work, right there, folks – especially for the women voters, who gasp at the mere thought of supporting someone who may seem unpopular).

    Like

  7. Trump Mobile, infinite power, etc. Hilarious photo.

    Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Trump has so much game, and the general public (and especially libtards) have not seen great game in a White male public figure (especially a politician) in such a long time (maybe a generation), that they really have no clue on how to deal with him. CH, you could probably make a fortune as a hired contractor to advice Hillary, or Jeb! on how to counter The Donald. If you do, of course, we will be obliged to hunt you down.

      Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Like

      • Suburban_elk says:

        Not to go all “pointy elbows” on your asses, but …

        My ratings, left to right –

        6, 7, 8.5, Trump in the Middle, 8, 7.5, 6

        The two best at his side, and the two worst on the edge.

        Blonde brown and red hair in the middle – but not that there is anything wrong with black hair!

        Like

      • Suburban_elk says:

        Second from the right is an 8 or 8.5 though because of killer bod (check out that ass shape zone).

        And in addition to her, the blonde in yellow has the best legs.

        Like

    • mendo says:

      HAHA….I missed that the first time. That’s beautiful!

      Like

  8. Ang Aamer says:

    It’s nice to see someone who knows how the media game is played.

    Trump knew that when Fox dug in on Megyn weeks ago this might happen. So at a point when his poll numbers were going up vs Cruz he hit the nuclear option. As with any threat you have to be able to pull the trigger.

    And I love the timing. He did this stunt inside the weekly print window. Barely one-two daily print cycles, Masterful work by a skilled practitioner.

    This day will go down like “I paid for this microphone” unscripted moments in a campaign where in hindsight all can see it’s a turning point.
    Trump essentially is saying he’s bigger than Fox News. And he may right.
    Fox should have come to it’s senses and ditched Me-gyn. But like many media elite the idea of someone dictating terms is unbelievable.

    And mark my words if Fox debate ratings tank AND Trump wins Iowa. You will see the stunned incoherent jabber of abject disbelief in Main Stream Media.

    They will have a crisis of faith so profound that they will question the future of their profession – Openly. Look for Kristol and Krauthammer to both do the “I can’t believe it happened” stories and openly wonder if they are actually on the wrong side of history.

    Like

    • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

      I prefer to call them the Lame Stream Media.

      Like

    • Experienced Father says:

      The credibility collapse of thje MSM has arrived.

      Game over.

      The MSM is now simply a toy for billionaire elites to build a media bubble they can retreat into.

      It has little if anything now to do with reality.

      Like

    • Suburban_elk says:

      This day will go down like “I paid for this microphone” unscripted moments in a campaign where in hindsight all can see it’s a turning point.

      What does this mean?

      Trump is going to kill in Iowa. He will get near to 50 percent, and that will be that.

      If he gets over 50 percent, then we can start in with the purges.

      Like

    • anon says:

      Most of this is accurate, except the communist anti-white left will never admit they were wrong about a single thing, nor even get close to doing so. Witness the brown rape crisis in Europe, which we on the right has warned about for years. The left never, ever admits it was wrong, even when obvious world events prove otherwise in a way that leaves no room for reasonable debate. Mass gang rapes in Europe? The MSM responds with “We can’t let evil white men mess up the feminist narrative — it was still white men’s fault.”

      You will never see a MSM leftist publish something questioning of the left is on the wrong side of history.

      Like

  9. Sentient says:

    The Cucks Are Desperate

    Like

  10. ar10308 says:

    O’Reilly is utterly to the point of despair in that clip. He can’t even maintain frame towards the end. You can tell he’s a man who has been given marching orders and knows their futility, but has to keep attempting anyway. It is painful to watch.
    Much like the scene in Glengarry Glen Ross when Levene goes to Spano’s house. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROYuupoGarQ

    The lead up to tonight and tonight itself is a political watershed moment in our time.
    1960 – Kennedy beat Nixon in the debate and shows the power of television.
    1981 – Reagan fired the Air Traffic Controllers.
    2016 – Trump has taken total control of the New York News Media Industrial Complex.

    We just witnessed history.

    Like

    • Matthew Smith says:

      It’s funny to see shitlibs call O’Reily a racist. They don’t even realize that he’s not. When O’Reily had David Duke on, O’Reily said that there’s no such thing as European-Americans.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Philomathean says:

      Yeah, O’Reilly’s stance from pseudo brass ball posturing to total exposure of his soft underbelly was embarrassing… For him.

      Like

    • jackmcg says:

      I hate O’Reilly because he’s *almost* there, he has the attitude and the intelligence, but he never goes full shitlord. Its annoying. Bill Whittle is exactly the same way.

      Liked by 1 person

      • ar10308 says:

        Bill Whittle is becoming more and more shitlord. He’s been having conversations with Stefan Molyneux and you can slowly hear Bill coming around to some of the Shitlord ideas. Now, I doubt he’ll ever communicate the way we do at least in his produced content, because he has a style and brand that aims to be more eloquent and elevate the discussion. But I’ve heard him come around to the idea of IQ and cultural potential. He’s also in agreement with banning further Muslim Immigration.

        Like

      • Suburban_elk says:

        O’Reilly is extremely smart, his iq is north of 150, but just like Megyn he blew it, and right there on his own show.

        That was his chance to find some compromise position where he acknowledges that Donald has the upper hand – where he acknowledges this but brings something (anything) to the table, something that shows that he still has relevance.

        That was his chance, and he blew it. What an idiot. Get off the stage you dinosaur.

        Like

      • anon says:

        Wake up. O’Reilly is a Jew. He is not even close to being a conservative. By definition, he cannot be a “shitlord.” He is not trying to go shitlord.

        His entire act is an example of fake controlled pseudo-opposition to make the sheeple think there is a conservative voice in the MSM. He does it with the whole “fair and balanced” act, and it is literally an act. Sure, he will bash Hillary and Democrats too, but he is not truly on the right side. The last 5 months and the Trump thing have proven it, if you pay attention.

        When you realize that O’Reilly _literally_ is a Jew, and do your research and notice “every. single. time.” when you see the open and obvious anti-white stuff (articles gloating that the era of the white man is over, etc.), and you again consider that O’Reilly is the best we’ve got as a “conservative” voice in the MSM, then look at the National Review debacle, you should become more horrified and your level of anger should grow, if you are a white man.

        Like

    • whorefinder says:

      Reagan firing the Air Traffic Controllers is rarely talked about these days because it made the left look so bad. At the time, it was a *huge* deal, with the left predicting the strike would end Reagan/he looked like a dictator/ that every plane crash would be blamed on him.

      Then it succeeded, and the left shoved it down the Memory Hole. Reagan looked strong but not overreaching, the polls supported the move, and the left realized that over-unionized workers demanding ridiculous things would not fly with the public.

      Liked by 1 person

      • ar10308 says:

        Exactly. If the Left is telling you that everyone will hate you, there’s a real good chance you’re on the right path, so doubling down might even be a good idea. The Left is correct about almost nothing.

        Like

  11. Russell Ashbaugh @MuskieRA says:

    Christ. O’Reilly, equal parts obnoxious and nauseating. “No reporter will agree not to ask certain questions!” Bullshit. If it’s a condition of the interview, he’s got a choice to make. If he makes it then reneges, he’s dishonest too. Jesus.

    Like

    • anon says:

      Right. Caught him in an act of Jew right there. He DID agree — and then broke his promise. After Trump has been VERY nice to him for 5 months, and what I mean by that last point is that it REALLY IS TRUE that it is an understatement to say that Trump could embarrass O’Reilly and the rest of the Global Power. Even here, Trump holds back, after O’Reilly EARNED Trump giving some real realtalk. You can see that Trump is actually pissed, as he should have been, but still handles it well, of course.

      Like

  12. I love it. From CNN:

    “[Trump] added that Fox had been “extremely nice,” but it was too late. In an interview with CNN just before the rally, Trump said Fox News “apologized” to him for a mocking statement the television network issued…”

    He has taken the most watched network in the country, pumped her and dumped her, and ‘she’ is begging him to take her back. Has any other candidate for any office at any time, anywhere in the world of electoral politics had this kind of power? Even Obama had to simper before he won in 2008.

    Although in this day of and age of fractionated news sources no one medium captures attention so singularly as television used to, I also can’t wait for news that whatever tv coverage the Drake University event got beat the debate’s ratings. And for Trump for rub that in their faces too.

    Like

  13. Carlos Danger says:

    NEW WORLD ODOUR

    Like

  14. I concluded from watching the debate that Google can suck my cock. The parade of YouTube losers they trotted out to ask questions was enough to make me choke on my Cabernet. Fuck them and fuck Fox News.

    Like

  15. LordBromley says:

    I think the Trump & Mika (from Morning Joe) dynamic is fascinating. Mika identifies as a liberal but it seems like everyday she cannot get enough either of talking to or talking about Trump. I think she’s in love with him

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      USA men, within the Gramscian Cocoon of Anti-Reality, have become so d@mned effeminate that women will swoon for any dude who speaks in a slow, deep, measured masculine voice. Even within the GOP [the ostensibly “patriarchal” party – LOL’ed], the hopeless effeminacy was on display tonight with all the whining and lisping and b!tching and cat-fighting at the Donald-less “debate”. Everywhere I go now, chicks are undressing me with their eyes, because their hamsters can sense that I am Poz-free and masculine.

      Like

    • jackmcg says:

      My favorite Trump-Mika clip:

      pic.twitter.com/A9nBCncupj

      — FinMin Taylor Swift (@SwiftOnEconomia) January 28, 2016

      Like

  16. Ponce du Lion says:

    Examples of micro reframes?? (Trump level please)

    Like

  17. John Dark says:

    The Dark Knight Rises:

    Bane:
    “No-one cared who I was until I put on the mask”

    CIA Dweeb:
    “If I pull that off, will you die?”

    Bane:
    “It would be extremely painful.”

    CIA Dweeb:
    “You’re a big guy.”

    Bane:
    “For you.”

    Like

    • Ponce du Lion says:

      Lol good one

      Like

    • whorefinder says:

      Tom Hardy’s voice doing Bane in that movie was a meta-level shitlord. He was full on mocking the entire superhero genre with his sarcastic tone (and I like the genre and the movie). He almost sounds like he doesn’t care about it at all, and is doing it as a lark.

      It really concluded the trilogy as a group of villains —Joker, Bane, Scarecrow, and Ra’s al Ghul—who are meta-aware they are fictional characters in a movie and are seeking to play with that/break the conventions consciously/mess with the audience they know is watching them in a theater.

      This is why Liam Neeson was cast as Ras–it was meant to refer to his role in the (horrible) Star Wars films as the mentor who dies, only to have Ras pull the swerve, not die at first, become the bad guy, die, claim to live forever, and then, in the 3rd film, appear (though dead) and mock Bruce with “there are many ways to live forever!”

      Though the villains never break the fourth wall, they are approaching it, but not from a winking, smirking angle—more of a deadly serious playing-with-reality angles.

      Think I’m wrong? Christopher Nolan (the director) continously has a theme in his films of messing with the audience’s sense of reality. Memento messed with the main character’s perception and then messed with ours; ditto with Inception.

      If you go back and watch the Dark Knight Trilogy as a series of films not about Batman, but about a group of fictional supervillains aware they are fictional, aware they are fated to lose, and trying to mess with their fictional reality, it’s really mind blowing. Nolan is a filmic genius.

      Film nerd rape!

      Like

      • mendo says:

        Given how well the had done with The Dark Knight, I was disappointed with the third one.

        But that Bane voice it totally boss. And his jacket!

        Like

  18. anon says:

    Yes! Thank you, CH, for posting this one. This is the interview about which I commented right after it happened, with the observation that Trump made O’Reilly’s Jew come out. I commented that O’Reilly earned Trump naming the Jew on that one. O’Reilly looks like a pathetic clown. If he had the ability to feel shame or embarrassment (biologically, as a Jew, he does not), he would have been _blushing_. Not only do you see that he is a Jew in form (voice, accent, mannerisms, appearance of his face) but also in substance (a baldfaced liar, and that is a video of him being caught in the act and called on it by a superior man — that is the reaction you get when you really catch one in a lie and a hint of embarrassment creeps in). I have been pointing out for 5 months that Fox has been worse than CNN in its coverage of Trump. Every evening O’Reilly attempts to do a hit job disguised as his “fair and balanced” “I’m just a reasonable centrist” act, and every night Trump destroys him. Fox is the most reprehensible of all because it presents itself to the sheep as the “conservative” alternative. It is all so clear now.

    Like

  19. anon says:

    Trump says that going on with O’Reilly is tougher than doing the debate, but both are tough because Trump REALLY HAS BEEN the bigger man in so many ways, exactly opposite of the MSM. I’m not talking about “bigger man” in an alpha sense — although, of course, CH is right about that. I’m talking about Trump has held back on really saying what I call real realtalk, even though the MSM and the Global Power has earned it. Whether he is on stage with 3% Jeb! and 7 others who have no chance, or whether he’s on with O’Reilly, the MSM literally hits him with baldfaced lies when everyone knows the real deal (just like with “black lives matter”), and Trump does NOT truly call them out on it, even though they know that he knows that they know that he knows. Trump attends a Republican debate and gets asked about “war on women” when everyone knows that is bullshit, not to mention women love Trump and he’s provided millions of jobs for women. He gets asked about a few corporate bankruptcies, after the Jew banks were bailed out. (He called the banks “killers”: “Don’t worry about them; they are killers.” He was literally right.)

    It is “tough” for Trump to do these bullshit interviews and debates and hold back on really delivering some real realtalk. He has to be on his game at all times.

    Like

  20. whorefinder says:

    Trump could walk into a room, take a steaming shit on a woman’s dinner plate, make her eat it, and ten minutes later have her begging to suck him off.

    Or maybe I just described the Faggot Within’s sexual fantasy of the day.

    Faggot within rape!

    Like

  21. Greg Eliot says:

    O’Reily, indeed the entire Cathedral, throw up that “turn the other cheek” and “forgive your enemies” card to call into question a Christian’s faith, yet they themselves wouldn’t hold to that standard and are not even Christian.

    Sticks in my craw, and I wish Christians would know their Bible better to gainsay these disingenuous attempts.

    Short version:

    1) These principles have to do with one’s personal ego and laying it aside, if one would be a true disciple, indeed, one of the Elect. Not all Christians belong to that hierarchy level, though it is the goal. It was a revolutionary concept, especially to the proverbial “stiff-necked” Hebrews and human nature in general, but it’s the Gold Standard by which one will merit becoming one of the Elect, and a governor in the new world. It most assuredly never was meant to mean that Christians are to be door mats or not protect themselves and their loved ones from physical violence, and anyone who says so is a liar, a son of Satan.

    2) There are many verses which speak of “knocking the dust from one’s sandals and walking away” when confronted with enemies of Truth and God’s Word. “For what fellowship does the light have with darkness?”, etc. Ergo, walking away from a situation where nothing good is to be gained, especially in the cause of Christ, is totally Biblical and Christian.

    I wish The Donald would have thrown that point back at O’Reilly, instead of a weak “eye for an eye” mention that made the latter appear to win that point.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      Good stuff, GE. Thanks.

      Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      Until Howard Storm explained the concept of spiritual warfare in his NDE video on You tube, I didn’t understand Christianity either as I do now. I don’t think most people get it explained to them as it should be. Once that happened, it all made sense and my questions fell by the wayside as it came together seamlessly. This is made worse by the fact that religious education is difficult to get by osmosis now. Not like when we were kids. You could get a decent udnerstanding of religion from films alone. Not now. I wish my parents had continued going to church after I went to Holy communion for the first time. I wish it had been explained that way sooner. I now see it would have made a big difference for the better in my life

      Like

    • Publius says:

      Yep. Meant to mention that particular nasty Jew tactic.

      Like

    • Aufeis says:

      You, KingM, and others could continuously post bible quotes in the comments section, with pertinent shitlord’s commentary, so that The Donald’s people who read this site can assure that he is armed.

      Like

    • Rum says:

      “How the Irish saved Civilization” by T. Cahill is pretty good book. It does more to contextualize European Christianity than anything else I have read.

      See, Christianity in Europe =/= Middle Eastern Religion.

      European Christianity started with St. Patrick. Not St. Paul.

      Like

  22. Sean Fielding says:

    Trump must have faults, but God they’re hard to find: even his milkshake flavor is the one America needs.

    Like

  23. chris says:

    The pause before unloading the “for you” coda builds a smug anticipation in the girl that her qualification attempt will soon be validated.

    Like

  24. Robert What? says:

    I was starting to get embarrassed … for O’Reilly. The guy literally does not know when to STFU and move onto another subject. Like a woman who can’t stop talking about something that ticks her off.

    Like

  25. Mobi says:

    I think Trump is after bigger fish.

    There’s probably a mass of centrist, and even leftist, ‘closet Trumpists’, for whom just about the greatest social faux pas would be to be associated with those lowest-of-the-low, the ultimate in polite-society untouchables – the (‘omg – I can’t even…’)

    …’Fox News viewers!’.

    Trump could have attended the debate, and brushed her off easily. Instead, he’s picked a very public fight with precisely the ‘Fox News types’ he needs to distance himself from to run the table against Hillary.

    The Donald: ‘Don’t worry (moderate America). Not only am I not synonymous with ‘Fox News types’, I’ll slap them down when I need to.’

    All over America, now: ‘Hmmm… Fox News, or Donald Trump. Fox News, or Donald Trump, Which side am I on?’)

    It’s calculated. He’s getting good advice.

    Like

  26. George says:

    Liberal media can’t understand why narcissism is a powerful trait for attraction: http://time.com/4136439/trump-narcissism-strange/

    Like

Leave a Reply