Feed on
Posts
Comments

Game In The Political Sphere

Dirty Randy wonders how to evade a typical substance-free leftoid attack.

You can see the Hivemind formulating their comeback: “They must be Stormfronters.” What’s the proper way to respond? Ignore and plow? Agree and amplify?

A number of game concepts could work here.

Agree&Amplify

“You’re gonna love my jackboots kicking you in your nutless sack.”

Ignore&Plow

“Answer the question. What do you think of the black on white rape stats? Do you deny them?”

Reframe the ad hominem

“Beats being a member of the gaypedoface club.”

Increase The Voltage

“You must be wearing a buttplug right now. Do you take it out for a breather once in a while?”

Patronize Your Enemy

“Why are you so afraid of honest discussion?”

Dismissive Mastery

“Gay”

I’m sure the more skilled game practitioners in the studio audience could come up with a few more effective counterattacks. It shouldn’t be hard. What the hell kind of semantic weaponry do shitlibs have besides squealing like stuck piglets and stamping their wee hooves with DEFCON 1 butthurt?

***

FYI, the Chateau Heartiste blog recently passed 70 million total views.

Too bad it’s not a dollar per view. 😦

226 Responses to “Game In The Political Sphere”

  1. PA says:

    I’ve found that it’s easy to discuss things with awakened people here or in real life if you agree on the basics but differ on a detail or two. But it’s hard as hell to deal with reasonably high-iq millennials. They’re slippery as fuck. You corner him on “what if your daughter started twerking” and he will give an absurd answer like “she doesn’t have the ass for that.” (Real life exchange).

    They’re afflicted with what VD calls gamma bubble.

    Like

    • corvinus says:

      They’re afflicted with what VD calls gamma bubble.

      And it’s hilarious how much “cuckservative” pisses these types off. It’s a quintessentially sigma insult, and as VD has pointed out, sigmas and gammas don’t get along too well, to put it nicely.

      Like

      • Breeze says:

        Rephrase the question like this:

        “Would you be ok with your daughter twerking, yes or no?”

        And then keep repeating it until you get a yes or no. If they say yes “So you’re happy for your daughter to sexually objectify herself, yes or no?”

        Like

    • PA says:

      The gamma is best understood not as a gradient on a natural scale, but as a fractured male. “Alpha ambition without the alpha goods” is how I dub them.

      Every boy and man is tempted to hide his ego behind a protective cocoon of lies. “I didn’t slap the football away because I was scared of it flting at my face; I was trying to protect the plants in the yard.” Hard, ugly reality is how you overcome that gamma-maker tendency.

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Your name is Jon Stewart? Your family is from Scotland?

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Your name is Ralph Lauren? Was your family French Huguenot?

        Like

      • PA says:

        I am neither Scottish nor “Scottish.”

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Your name is Woody Allen? Are you any relationship to Steve Allen the comic? Or to George Allen who coached the Washington Redskins?

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        JON STEWART REDUCED TO STENOGRAPHER AFTER WHITE HOUSE MEETINGS REVEALED http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3318318/posts

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “The guy who prides himself on speaking truth to power, as the anti-establishment, take-to-both-sides-hero for millennials everywhere… reduced to a stenographer for a sitting president so thin-skinned about any and all criticism that he needs to dictate his own comedy. As originally reported in Politico by Darren Samuelson, the outgoing Daily Show host met with President Barack Obama twice in the past four years but failed to let anyone know about it…”

        Like

      • PA says:

        “Truth to power…”

        More like marketing for the power.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        So your family isn’t really from Scotland, they’re actually from Eastern Europe? Why do you suppose they changed their name? That’s really strange. I’ve never before heard of anyone changing their family name.

        Like

      • PA says:

        What are you talking about?

        Like

      • PA says:

        I don’t think I’ve so much as mentioned Scotland here on the past 8 years, barring a Rod Steward video I once posted.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I’m talking about naively asking these Eskimos who they really are. Frigging Jon Leibowitz the Eskimo, marching off dutifully to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to get his marching orders from Axelrod & Obama, and then heading back over to the TV studio to pretend to be a non-partisan Scotsman named “Stewart”. Call them out on it.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “Gosh, that chick Lois Lerner, the one who committed all the crimes at the IRS. Lerner? Leibowitz? Lerner? Leibowitz? Y’all aren’t related, are you?”

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “C’mon, man, are you sure you’re not related to her? Y’all sure do look strangely similar to one another. You sure she ain’t your cousin or something?”

        Like

      • Rum says:

        Some of my family were French Huguenots.
        I was raised among folk who discussed at the dinner table the cruelty and mis-deeds of King Louis the 14th – of France – in the 16th century.

        On close inspection, they all had big bulging brains, green eyes, red hair, and a weird tendency toward being successful at whatever they undertook.

        Like

      • James1 says:

        The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

        Like

      • James1 says:

        The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”

        One cannot defend himself against the Jew. He attacks with lightning speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any attempt at defense.

        Quickly he turns the attacker’s charges back on him, and the attacker becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Jew wants. He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he has no time to do what the Jew really fears: to attack. The accused has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought the Jew. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the following radical conclusions:

        1. One cannot fight the Jew by positive means. He is a negative, and this negative must be erased from the German system, or he will forever corrupt it.
        2. One cannot discuss the Jewish question with the Jews. One can hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
        3. One cannot allow the Jew the same means one would give an honest opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and nobility only to trap his enemy.
        4. The Jew has nothing to say about German questions. He is a foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights that he always abuses.
        5. The so-called religious morality of the Jews is no morality at all, rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to protection from the state.
        6. The Jew is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically — he follows entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken through political means.
        7. A Jew cannot insult a German. Jewish slanders are but badges of honor for a German opponent of the Jews.
        8. The more a German person or a German movement opposes the Jew, the more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Jews, that is a sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Jews, or who is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
        9. The Jew evaluates German questions from the Jewish standpoint. As a result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
        10. One must either affirm or reject anti-Semitism. He who defends the Jews harms his own people. One can only be a Jewish lackey or a Jewish opponent. Opposing the Jews is a matter of personal hygiene.
        These principles give the anti-Jewish movement a chance of success. Only such a movement will be taken seriously by the Jews, only such a movement will be feared by them.

        The fact that he shouts and complains about such a movement therefore is only a sign that it is right. We are therefore delighted that we are constantly attacked in the Jewish gazettes. They may shout about terror. We answer with Mussolini’s familiar words: “Terror? Never! It is social hygiene. We take these individuals out of circulation just as a doctor does to a bacterium.

        The Jew

        by Joseph Goebbels

        Like

      • James1 says:

        “where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression ‘lost tribes of Israel’ applied to the tribes which disappeared — not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe — lost to all decency.”

        General George S Patton

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        The White Knight in me almost wants to NAJALT on that Goebbels quote, but it’s 100% the God’s Honest Truth – they really are the children of the Father of Lies. Any URLs for the Patton quote? Talk about “Killing Patton” – the NKVD/KGB and the Rothschilds would have had him at Public Enemy #1.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        RUM – Nassim Nicholas Taleb and Charles Murray had a televised pow-wow which has since been scrubbed from the public record by the NKVD Eskimos at C-SPAN, but NNT made the point that everywhere in the historical record, you saw French Huguenots moving in and excelling, and Charles Murray was fascinated by this.

        Like

      • Anonymous says:

        Replace “Jew” with female and the code is cracked.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Joe says:

      Why do you bother trying to deal with them? I don’t really argue any more, unless somebody pisses me off with their inane blather and I want to make them look like a complete ass.

      I could see if we were in a situation where our society could be turned around. But it can’t. We’re on an airplane that lost all four engines. We’re going down. Yelling at the pilot who damaged the plan with unwise maneuvers, telling him to pull up, is not only needlessly stressful on you, but it doesn’t help him or alter the outcome a whit. Why not just step in the back and see if you can use your last minutes to hook up with a hot stewardess?

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Mildly O/T, but remember the millennial Admin at WP, named Kevin Conboy, who went apoplectic at CH? I discovered from cyber-stalking him that he was married to a nurse out there in Colorado. Anyway, he went strangely silent after that. Do you suppose he took to actually reading CH, and maybe we might have converted him? Helped him to save his marriage with that nurse? That would be like a Divine Miracle.

        Like

      • tteclod says:

        Capt. Obvious:

        Here’s context for Mr. Conboy. [Hoping I’ve got the right guy…]

        Show some compassion… but keep the children safe.

        “My mental illnesses seems to be a miasma of anxiety and depression and while I feel like I live without them often enough, lately I’m noticing the cold comfort of my old, heavy skin more and more, and what’s worse is that I’m affecting the people I love when I have it on.” – December 2013.

        You can get his published updates here: http://alternatekev.me/

        As Joe said, “Why do you bother…?”

        Like

    • Benny Hill says:

      Now you know why those late night comedy shows exist.

      Programming in dumb non-sequitor thought patterns.

      I’m to the point I can’t watch ANYTHING without seeing the agenda and it sucks.

      I decided to watch “Hell on Wheels” got to about the 4th episode and said “nope”.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “I’m to the point I can’t watch ANYTHING without seeing the agenda and it sucks.” ——— This. Times a million. It’s everywhere. Every. Frigging. Where. Children’s Shows, commercials, women’s shows, sporting events, all the Big 3 fall/spring television series. Probably even worse in the movies, but I haven’t stepped foot in a theater in about five years.

        Like

    • Arbiter says:

      But it’s hard as hell to deal with reasonably high-iq millennials. They’re slippery as fuck.

      So true. They have learned to ignore the main issue and slip into sidetracking, often plain non sequiturs.

      They remind me of that quote that Putin supposedly said about Obama:

      “Negotiating with Obama is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon kicks over the pieces, pisses on the board, and then declares victory.”

      They always avoid theoretical examples by focusing on the particulars in the example that have nothing to do with the principle that is being discussed. If they thought for a second they would know what they are doing, but they don’t think. They have learned the Left’s principle that winning in order to take is the whole point. Only the Right cares about right and wrong, true or false.

      Why this difference? Again we must remember: The Left is focused on taking, the Right is focused on building. Therefore the Left is all about attacking, while the Right seeks to find out the truth, since you can’t build with the wrong measurements.

      This is so because what we call the “Right” is the normal way of life across the world. Socialism, Marxism, is the strategy of a minority who bribe the masses in exchange for their help in taking power. Truth has no meaning when the whole point is simply to take the seats the other side possesses, not to improve the economy.

      Thus the Left’s slippery nature in debates. I counter this primarily by Ignore & Plow as CH names it. No matter what they bring up as a sidetrack I say, e.g., “Later. But first answer the question. Were you or were you not aware of these statistics?”

      I’ll repeat the same thing over and over again when I notice that the leftist tries to avoid it. This is a big mistake people usually make: they allow the leftists to change the subject. They start defending themselves against the labels the leftist throws out, and so forth.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “… like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon kicks over the pieces, pisses on the board, and then declares victory.”

        Like

  2. The Raven says:

    I added “Gay” to my arsenal thanks to the Chateau. It has an effect out of proportion to its size.

    [CH: just like AIDS. #doubleplusheh]

    Like

    • Rum says:

      Any professional denier of realism regarding racial differences is set for life nowadays. I mean, as the nightmare-ish acheivement gap(s) extends itself off into eternity, any kind of countervailing argument has a market value approaching “a lot”. Because the Cathederal is infinitely rich. Your fiat money at work…

      Like

      • cover20 says:

        So those seeking a career should develop the skill of making those arguments, but to save his soul, to do it in a way that won’t actually convince anyone.

        Like

    • PWN says:

      Gay, boring, you must be the life of the party when you go out etc. It’s what I tell shitlibs when they discuss politics. I actively ignore them after I say this and talk to other people in the place I’m at. Makes them butthurt they don’t have my reactionary attention. lol

      Like

  3. James Blonde says:

    You can count on most people, white or non white to always avoid the truth because its black and ugly; you can walk around slapping people wirh it and they will pretend they didnt understand what you said.

    Thats your que to slap em again.

    [CH: i understand the compulsion of people to find succor in platitudes, but when the lies become the official narrative and not just comely aphorisms to help grandma accept mortality, we’ve got problems that require addressing.]

    Like

  4. Anonymous says:

    Is there a good site about women and ideas on how to game them in the manosphere?

    [CH: most droll. or should i say… most troll?]

    Like

    • Foolish Pride says:

      No Mr. Millennial, game advice does not go up your ass.

      Like

    • Starets says:

      “Be good goyim. Leave the politics to your betters. Lets talk about how to defile shiksas!”

      Like

      • PWN says:

        Eh, the positive is that Jewish-shiska daughters look and are really slutty. If a girl is really pretty, sometimes I feel bad slapping her with my dick a little, but half Jewish girls have the right look for it. It’s those lips, probably.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Is there a good site about women and ideas on how to game them in the manosphere?

      ]
      We only deal in gaming them in meat world at the chateau.

      And sometimes we actually discuss other things! 😉

      Like

    • anon says:

      How many times are you going to concern troll that CH is not talking about how to fuck the shiksas you disingenuous faggot?

      Like

  5. […] Game In The Political Sphere […]

    Like

  6. jjrockmale says:

    Seriously, I can’t wait to have a bi-racial baby via marital rape. And I totally support her kicking me out of it’s life when I’m no longer convenient! Why would you doubt otherwise?

    Like

  7. Danger says:

    My strategy with the limp wristers has been to never let them shift the goalposts or migrate the argument.

    When they try to change the subject, I pull them right back to the direct question and tell them we can’t expand the argument until they address or concede the first point.

    Without variability they ALWAYs go into rage meltdown mode and try to silence or block you. The more extreme one’s will dox you or engage in occupational terrorism to get you fired.

    While this is the ignore and plow mwthod, it pays to know who your audience is before you choose your return. If it is thinking men, ignore and plow works…if it’s luscious coeds, anythin which is funny and humiliating to them will do. Especially if it outs their betatude.

    Like

    • Ripp says:

      ^this.

      the other tactics they use are semantic bs and continuous straw men.

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      > “I pull them right back to the direct question… without variability they ALWAYs go into rage meltdown mode” ——— These Leftists can maintain the snark and the faux-polite arrogance for a few sentences, or maybe even a paragraph, but if you keep pressing the original point, then pretty soon they’ll blow their top and go nukular on your @ss.

      Like

    • Horatio says:

      15 years experience has led me to adopt this model.

      It is the only strategy that reliably works. It is the one Ive observed work with others.

      Do NOT bring ANYTHING else into the argument. The lefties use racist and bigot precisely because it stops their attacker driving a point. When they say racist, the cuckservative goes into a feotal position and goes straight from offense to defense. The stormfronter will drag something else up, and shift the goalposts, most of the time, no, all the time to territory the leftard is more confortable with.

      Never allow the goalposts to be changed. Never allow a slur to stop you focusing on your point, and never try to ataack with something else other than the weapon you were attacking with beforehand.

      Ignore, bring the discussion back to what made then squeal instantly and continue to plow.

      Dont allow them the opportunity to attack or discuss something else.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Horatio, if you’re in the Gramscian Cocoon of Anti-Reality [== an elite university campus], then the White Knight/Eskimo Leftists will get physically violent on your @ss. That’s when pumping all that iron finally pays off.

        Like

    • PWN says:

      This has been my experience too. If you’re condescending about their ignorance, they rage-melt even faster.

      Like

  8. BigAl says:

    DEFCUCK 1

    Like

  9. walawala says:

    Here’s a video now going viral in Hong Kong and China. it shows a girl and her apparently cheating boyfriend. Note his supplication and how she starts to kick and punch his efforts to display his regret. Any doubts that an apology will kill attraction should be noted here:

    http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/breaking/20150729/54028772

    Here’s the original video from the Facebook media site.

    The comments are interesting. Many just have absolutely no respect for the guy “Sad” is repeated several times in the comments.

    Like

    • SC says:

      If he really did cheat, doesn’t that mean he’s at least not an omega? It means that he was able to have parallel relationships with women, when a lot of men have trouble getting just one relationship with a woman.

      Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Sad. She has a good front kick, but needs to work on her punches. Could it be that Chinese men are like this out of necessity, since there are what, 5 men for every 1 woman, or some crazy ratio like that? The women have all the hand. It is the inverse of the situation in Russia, where, thanks to the effectiveness of the German army, there is something like 3 women for every 1 man – which is why alcoholics with no jobs there can get what, in the USA, would be solid 8s and 9s.

      Like

      • PA says:

        “thanks to the effectiveness of the German army”

        This isn’t 1953.

        Like

      • corvinus says:

        Because of hypergamy, the horrible sex ratio in China is most acute in backwater rural areas. In the cities, including Hong Kong, they actually often have more women than men. So no, he doesn’t have an excuse for his betatude.

        Also, the sex ratio in Russia is normal among younger men and women. It’s only woman-heavy if you’re considering babushkas. But for whatever reason, Eastern European women are better-looking than their men, with the reverse being true in the British Isles, where it’s very common for fat fugs to have better-looking, successful husbands.

        Like

      • walawala says:

        In the various Chinese blogs and posts one post I read from a guy translates something like “I love this kind of girl, hate this kind of guy.”

        Like

      • James1 says:

        ““thanks to the effectiveness of the German army”

        Outstanding!

        Like

      • avenroad says:

        Google “leftover ladies”. There might be more men than women in China, but there are not enough high-status men with good jobs and apartments for all the entitled princesses out there.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “entitled princesses” ——— The intentionally manufactured cultural tsunami of Cluster B insanity. And the Chinese Total Fertility Rate [TFR] continues its steady inexorable descent down to 0.0.

        Like

      • PWN says:

        If you exclude people over 40, Russian women don’t really outnumber Russian men. Russian men just drink themselves to an early grave.

        Like

      • Arbiter says:

        there is something like 3 women for every 1 man

        Dude, seriously? That is not at all the case in Russia.

        But yeah, many Russian women are a real pain to date, if you ask Russian guys. Of course, the women have a lot of stories about the shitty behavior of many of the men, too.

        In Ukraine – which really is just like Russia, regardless of what the West Ukrainians say – it is legal for a husband to beat his wife. “Yeah, take that, feminism!” you might say. But that country is full of drunk, shitty men who beat women frequently just because they can. Don’t look at that through the lens of U.S. politics, realize what a hell-hole Russia/Ukraine really is. Gangsters the lot of them.

        No wonder Ukrainians want the deal with the EU. What the media won’t mention is that the deal gives them all visas to the West, and that was the main selling point in Ukrainian debate – and one that socialists and sell-out-nationalists could all agree on. The Ukrainian men want to prey on Western women, like all non-Whites, and the Ukrainian women want to get away from the men. And they all want Western money and jobs. What they couldn’t take in the Cold War is now given to them freely.

        Like

      • corvinus says:

        But that country is full of drunk, shitty men who beat women frequently just because they can. Don’t look at that through the lens of U.S. politics, realize what a hell-hole Russia/Ukraine really is. Gangsters the lot of them.

        Thank 75 years of Communism. They’re not that way naturally. Pre-Communist immigrants in Western countries don’t act much different from other whites.

        And conversely, the Germans always complain that their ethnic kinsfolk from Russia and Kazakhstan act just like Russians.

        The Ukrainian men want to prey on Western women, like all non-Whites,

        Oh for pete’s sake…

        Like

    • corvinus says:

      I pissed off a girl not long ago. Thank God I didn’t react like that guy in the video. Kowtowing like that only seems to make the girlfriend more vicious, not less.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        HOLD YOUR GROUND. Maintain Frame at all costs. NO APOLOGIES! Eventually she’ll come around, and her pussy will be dripping right through her cotton panties for you.

        Like

    • PWN says:

      Who the heck gets on their knees for a woman(especially when apologizing)? I don’t think I’ll do that even when I’ll propose to a girl. I’ll expect her to get on HER knees after the proposal though.

      Like

  10. Super Mario says:

    Ok, try these witty comebacks on for size:

    “If NOT wanting to see young women get raped and old people get beaten to death makes you a Nazi, then I am Adolf J. Hitler himself. (puts hand out for handshake) Pleased to meet you, mein friend! ”

    “Well, I don’t know about this ‘Storm front’ outfit you speak of, but I sure do love shooting uppity poor colored boys in the head, and thank Yahweh it’s all just a part of my job as a border guard in the Isreali Defense Forces!”

    “Tell your wife I left my stahlhelm on the bedroom floor last night. I need it back. “

    Like

  11. Johnny Redux says:

    So, in a new study, it turns out that being Alpha is good for your health, and your chances at future success (in the bedroom, and in the boardroom): http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2015/07/28/study-bullies-have-higher-self-esteem-lower-depression-rates/

    Great quote from the article: “The average bully isn’t particularly sadistic or even deeply argumentative,” he says. “What they really are is people driven for status.”

    How will the limp-wristed, fat, pathetic, stop-the-bullying crowd react to such horrifying science that slipped through the Eskimo filters?

    Well, here is an example of one response, from the article: “Rob Frenette, co-founder of the advocacy and support group Bullying Canada, emphasizes that bullies usually have some sort of underlying issue, such as violence in the home, suggesting that bullying is triggered, not natural.” Yes, Bobby, being a member of the passive, unquestioning beta herd is much more natural, right? Too bad more boys cannot be triggered to be more Alpha. Well, if Beta is natural, than Alpha is supernatural – the super man.

    Like

  12. GasButtox says:

    Increase The Voltage :

    “Detox my Buttox”.

    Like

  13. Starets says:

    Members of La Raza wouldn’t shrink from being identified as ‘La Razers’. Members of the Nation of Islam wouldn’t shrink from being identified as ‘Nationers’. Instead both groups are in your face and proud of their groups.

    We have to get to the point where we can be equally in their face and proud about being ‘Stormfronters’ (or ‘WN’ers’ or ‘Identitarians’ or whatever pigeonhole they want to place white advocates into).

    So I think a good reply would be “Yeah it is ‘Stormfronters’. And WE are everywhere!”

    Like

    • whorefinder says:

      Again, as I said in another thread, the left keeps gifting us by using the media to express their deepest fears.

      Girl with the dragon tattoo? The leftist deep fear that white supremacists are going to come for them.

      Noose hangings? The left has mental breakdowns at noose imagery.

      etc.

      Pay attention rape!

      Like

      • Starets says:

        That’s a good point. Could be strategically useful

        Like

      • whorefinder says:

        VoxDay has stated that the third rule of SJWs is that they always project.

        So whatever they are insulting you with, it is what they feel about themselves. Whatever they show as a horror, they will literally wet their pants about and cow to.

        Projection rape!

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        WF, that is such a fundamentally important point about “projection” – just about every single insult out of an Eskimo’s mouth will secretly reveal some bizarre failing in its own personal life.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        YOU: “There is no global warming, and in fact solar output has decreased so suddenly that we are in perilous danger of entering a new Ice Age.” ESKIMO: “Ha ha ha, did you stop taking your meds?” ANALYSIS: Eskimo is secretly taking some sort of psychotropic pharmaceutical itself.

        Like

  14. whorefinder says:

    The interesting thing is how violent the reaction is from the cuckservasphere. They are going apeshit at the name.

    I think the cucks thought that by joining the Repubs/neocons, they could get the best of both worlds: from the left, intellectual respectability + invited to all the cool shindigs, even as the pet “opposition”; from the right, the feeling that they were “manly men” and not the limp-wristed queers + outsized influence since so few righties are granted “national respectability” by the msm.

    The cuckservative thing has cast them out of their safe haven. They are now not among the manly men of the right, and thoroughly denigrated and not deemed respectable by the groundswell right. The left, they know, will disown them the moment it’s convenient and obvious that they have no power.

    The cucks realize they are viewed as lefties in drag, and are being out grouped.

    Panic among the rabbits.

    Rabbit rape!

    [CH: this is exactly right. panic at the disco. and cuckservatives, being manlets of very little character, will have no defense against or recourse from their long overdue fate.]

    Like

    • Andy Warhol and Truman Capote at Studio 54

      Like

      • whorefinder says:

        Faggots gonna fag.

        Interesting thing about Warhol: despite his flamboyance and homosexuality and disordered lifestyle, he regularly attended a Catholic Church on the upper east side of Manhattan which was one of the last bastions of old-school, anti-homosexual preaching, run by Dominicans (the preaching order in the Catholic church).

        One of the last post-Vatican II priests with balls would rail every week on the evils of the homosexual behavior he saw going on and increasing in New York (this was the 1960s and 1970s, when post-Stonewall fagdom really came out).

        The preaching really had no compunction for the sin. Railed on them, hard. Like, if they did so today, they’d probably get a stern talking to and public shaming by whatever half-gay, wussy bishop was in charge of him.

        Yet Warhol silently took it, every week, and never complained.

        Like all weak rabbits, he was stunned into submission by strength.

        Grasp the nettle, boys.

        Preaching rape!

        Like

      • hmmmm says:

        Great photo. Two successful men, at ease, sharing a conversation. Around them are three women who can barely contain themselves, so giddy are they to be in the presence of these men. Well, except the woman to the farthest left – she finds her attention diverted to the little troll who stands behind her and appears to be putting his hand where it don’t belong…

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        That guy on the left looks like Lenny Bruce… and I ain’t so sure them gals is dames.

        Like

      • jez says:

        That looks like Debbie Harry in between ’em, and the subject of the big painting immediately behind.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        It does resemble her, but the age she looks in this photo doesn’t jibe with the timeframe of the photo, unless I’m mistaken. I’m guessing this pic is from the sixties, maybe very early seventies.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Yet Warhol silently took it, every week, and never complained.

        Well, many of them do have a masochistic streak… look at the abuse Strapon keeps coming back for.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Ah stands corrected… photo is much later than I at first thought.

        Makes sense now that I know the gal getting goosed is Jerry Hall… she and Harry are showing their age and look a bit, ah… shopworn.

        Like

      • Arbiter says:

        Interesting thing about Warhol: despite his flamboyance and homosexuality and disordered lifestyle, he regularly attended a Catholic Church on the upper east side of Manhattan

        Another funny thing is that he was almost murdered by a man-hating feminist who saw him as part of the patriarchy or whatever. (Her name escapes me at the moment. She founded “SCUM”, Society for Cutting Up Men, and said that “men are walking dildos and that’s all they are.”)

        The Left is made up of factions that would kill each other if they didn’t have the normals to hate instead.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “men are walking dildos and that’s all they are.” ——— Ssshhhhh, don’t tell anyone this, but she might have a point. I do strongly agree with you, though, in that the average leftist is one perceived insult away from going all Hutus -vs- Tutsis at the drop of a hat.

        Like

    • PWN says:

      This is what I thought of them too. It’s so obvious if you enjoy trying to understand where people come from emotionally and intellectually. Some people go to the zoo, I prefer observing people. It’s probably why I’m a misanthrope.

      Like

    • Interestingly, National Cuckview has not picked up on the new name we have have for them. Usually, they are hair-trigger butthurt; they like to strike a pose of being the ‘adult supervision’ in political commentary.

      I expected a home page denouncement of the cuckservative label, but so far, zippo. Not even an article from any of their blog contributors who are fairly well attuned to the latest culture war stuff.

      I may have to start throwing stink bombs in their comments.

      Like

      • whorefinder says:

        Like all “old school” righty publications, NR is about 3 steps too slow. They will probably fire the first writer to mention it—or John Derbyshire or Steve Sailer being correct.

        Buckley rape!

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > ” Not even an article from any of their blog contributors who are fairly well attuned to the latest culture war stuff.” ——— Does Jelly Roll Goldberg still produce Neocon Propaganda for them from the comfort of his talking couch?

        Like

  15. Mark Minter says:

    “Give your wife m

    Like

    • Kate Minter says:

      Give your wife, what? Millions? Masking tape? Multiple Boxers? Grr, this falling asleep on the keyboard/incomplete comment game really leaves a gal to wonder ❤

      Like

    • James Blonde says:

      That should have been “Give your wife D”

      Like

      • James Blonde says:

        CH, why do you tolerate sock puppetry but complain about eskimo behavior?

        Hypocrisy much?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Sock puppetry is when the same guy chimes in under different names, trying to make it look like his viewpoint has consensus.

        What this other guy is doing is just busting chops.

        And, yeah, it should be squelched… although like you once remarked, it’s a strange form of Cyberian accolade on some level.

        Like

      • James Blonde says:

        OK I stand corrected; but whatever he’s doing is a known eskimo tactic.

        Just think about how the eskimos have you guys attacking each other because they pretend to be you?

        If too many people engage in this behavior the entire board would be meaningless?

        Whats the next eskimo behavior that will be tolerated here?

        Like

      • Anonymous says:

        It’s funny how half your posts, you sound like you might actually have a 3 digit IQ (and a HS education), then you go back to the standard race troll horseshit. Yeah, bitch and moan about someone trolling you, when you’re the biggest troll on the board. Dipshit.

        Like

      • James Blonde says:

        you hate me

        cause im black

        Like

      • Arbiter says:

        t’s funny how half your posts, you sound like you might actually have a 3 digit IQ (and a HS education), then you go back to the standard race troll horseshit.

        Probably a matter of on-meds, off-meds.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I had somebody post as me a few weeks ago – maybe a month or so. Strangely, the actual post was kinda inconsequential. Might be some sort of a system-wide probe by some person [or persons], or possibly an A.I. program which is being tested on this site.

        Like

      • Starets says:

        “Whats the next eskimo behavior that will be tolerated here?”

        Making us all pastrami on rye sandwiches? With those really good pickles? I think they call that a muktuk at the eskimo delis.

        [CH: gotta give it to them, nothing beats an eskimo slow-cooked pastrami on rye.]

        Like

  16. Johnny Redux says:

    Feign ignorance, reassert, and amplify: “I am not sure how the weather plays into the argument, but how about answering the question with something that makes sense? Do I need to repeat it for you, or can you manage to get your sticky fingers to scroll back and find it?”

    Like

  17. Cortesar says:

    Liked by 1 person

  18. McGonzo says:

    “Nobody fantasizes about getting tied up and raped by a hippie, but they sure do about people dressed a Nazi.”

    Like

    • Cortesar says:

      lefty not hippie
      let us rephrase in zeitgeist

      “No woman ever fantasized about getting tied up and raped by a cuckservative, although wild,even women fantasies have their limits.”

      Like

    • elmer says:

      Woody Allen visualizing his ex-wife being ravished by a Nazi-helmeted biker in “Play it Again, Sam”.

      Like

  19. Rum says:

    “You race realism deniers are in a great kind of business. The more decades that pass with no changes in the horrible “acheivement gap between bla ks and whtts n Asians the more demand there is for your rancid, dishonest product.” Because of rape, or something…
    Heck, I bet that 20 years from now, the demand for rationalizations and excuse-mongering will be a billion dollar industry.”

    Like

  20. Starets says:

    Lolz at the vid.

    Whales un-beaching themselves.

    Like

    • Cortesar says:

      That requires special training and conditioning
      Here is how it is done

      Like

      • PWN says:

        I used to chat with this American girl that told me the fridges I like aren’t good because oversized pizzas don’t fit in them.
        1)why does she need oversized pizzas?
        2)who orders so much pizza that they have to keep some in the fridge?
        Gluttons disgust me.

        Like

      • Arbiter says:

        Holy crap. That picture.

        And they vote.

        Like

      • JironGhrad says:

        @PWN When I order pizza, usually I get 2-3 meals out of a large (approx. 12-14″). Leftovers really don’t belong left on the stove, but then that’s why there’s Tupperware, really. So to answer you, this girl was either a whale (as above) or congenitally lazy to the point of putting the entire pizza box in the refrigerator. Either way, pass.

        Like

  21. Mark Minter says:

    My tablet fucked up typing that comment before and submitted it. I do’t feel like retyping it.

    This is sort of the recommended response from the twitter shitposters that are fighting this out right now:

    Like

  22. Dead, not Sleeping. says:

    Amused mastery:

    Neo Nazis? I’ve got about 6 million jokes for the occasion, but much like your insult they’ve all been done to death.

    Then just keep rolling with bad (but hitlarious) Nazi puns until you feel like changing the subject.

    Like

  23. bob k. mando says:

    ‘cuckservative’ should be a term defining not just substitution of culture and race but any other element of International Socialism in place of our constitutional Republic.

    the destruction of racial and cultural distinctions is an overt goal in the Communist Manifesto:

    “What will be the attitude of communism to existing nationalities?

    The nationalities of the peoples associating themselves in accordance with the principle of community will be compelled to mingle with each other as a result of this association and thereby to dissolve themselves, just as the various estate and class distinctions must disappear through the abolition of their basis, private property.”

    Like

  24. Dude says:

    More fat girl gifs plz. Entertaining as all hell to watch. It’s like a typical trip to the grocery store in my neighborhood.

    Like

  25. Modern Primitive says:

    Off topic, here’s a link to hiring advice for male managers when taking on females from 1943. It’s interesting to see written in black what was not just common knowledge in those days but sound management advice, when the same thing today would get the author sacked, sued or both.

    Like

  26. Laguna Beach Fogey says:

    Comeback? Don’t even think about getting into a debate with these mofos. The time for debate is long gone. Just tell them to fuck off, and continue to go about your business. We’ve got work to do.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Yep… although most times the debate is for the sake of the silent peanut gallery… to give them heart at hearing how to stand up… rather than trying to convince the implacable opponent.

      Like

    • Anonymous says:

      This. Go to “this blog is dangerous”

      It is a waste of time arguing with women or leftist defectives. They are biologically incapable of understanding.

      Instead of trying to educate a woman or faggot, notice white men who seem intelligent (they’ll be fit and well dressed but not like a faggot) and introduce them to real red pill stuff.

      Start new lodges for white men only.

      Like

  27. “I ain’t racist; I am a specist!”

    Throws the interlocutor a curve ball so you can cite the European and Rwandan Empathy study if they press further.

    Like

  28. Aging Keyboard Jockey says:

    “Oh stop squealing.”

    Like

  29. Achtung! When the coup is complete and our publisher Mort Ketelboeter is installed as president for life, those of you who willingly hand over your wives, daughters, and lady-callers to Mr. Ketelboeter are assured of a most honorable and mostly painless death. Dowries also accepted.

    Like

  30. Kate Minter says:

    70 Million Views? Congratulations!

    Like

  31. Robert What? says:

    Not just shitlibs, but Cuckservatives drag out the “Stormfront” crap as well. So these pointers can be used with them as well.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      One Kathleen Zellner helped to free him, and will continue his suit against the city on behalf of his son.

      Every… fucking… time.

      Like

    • Bobby Cuddlefuck aka The Hamster Whisperer says:

      Thanks oink for the perfect display of the right’s blind eye towards facts. We all know the left engages in this kind of ideological obfuscation, and now you have provided a great example of the right’s u willingness to deal solely in facts. The guy was exonerated by DNA EVIDENCE. DNA doesn’t lie. And this points to a larger problem and why so many sensible positions of the right won’t be given the time of day by people who would be willing to shed some of their beliefs if fact based information was the basis of argument. Do blacks commit violent crimes at a higher rate than whites? Yes. Did this guy? No. And then you write that he “got his due.” It makes you just come off like a spiteful little man, and no one wants to listen to that sort of person.

      Like

  32. oink says:

    Bleeding heart whites get what its coming to them

    Bonus in the story, fed-gov bureaucrats abolishes the 1st amendment.

    It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s a fed-gov bureaucrat! So mighty, he can abolish the Bill of Rights by uttering a magic incantation!

    Like

  33. anonymous says:

    CH, congrats on the views. This is not an insult to you, but it sucks that this blog does not have about 70 million daily readers — all of the adult white men of the United States, give or take.

    The total fertility rate in the United States estimated for 2014 is 1.86 children per woman, which is below the replacement fertility rate of approximately 2.1. Compared to other Western countries, in 2012, U.S. fertility rate was lower than that of France (2.01), Australia (1.93) and the United Kingdom (1.92).

    However, U.S. population growth is among the highest in industrialized countries, because the differences in fertility rates are less than the differences in immigration levels, which are higher in the U.S.

    lzozlozzoz

    Like

  34. anonymous says:

    They are gloating on their wikipedia:

    Immigrants and their U.S.-born descendants are expected to provide most of the U.S. population gains in the decades ahead.

    Like

  35. anonymous says:

    very interesting article:

    In 2010, the average man weighed 194.7 pounds (88.3 kg); the average woman 164.7 pounds (74.7 kg).[75] The height of an American man was 5 feet 9 inches (1.75 m)[76] and woman 5 feet 3.8 inches (1.621 m)[77] The average BMI is 27.3 for males (overweight) and 28.5 for females (overweight).[78]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States#Marriage

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States#Marriage

    Like

  36. martin says:

    I am trying to wrap my head around feminists in tech asserting they are discriminated against and that this is a big problem. It doesn’t make any sense. I believe they are discriminated against, but that discrimination is a natural consequence of life, human beings discriminate. So the troubling part is why feminists are so obsessed with tech jobs despite most people agreeing that the men in them are socially awkward and bad with women. Usually women run from people like that. So that leaves us to ponder if women think these jobs are so valuable, then the men doing well in them must also be. Or are women just lying liars and this is all subterfuge and they are merely attacking the most recent successful business trend, but then why tech and not others? It’s like the tech jobs are a magnet for women.

    Like

    • oink says:

      expertise in engineering is NOT cheap; demands a pretty penny. the plutocracy is desperate to lower costs there, hence the push to expand the workforce base.

      Like

      • oink says:

        follow the moolah.

        Like

      • martin says:

        so you are saying they can expand the work force and get cheaper workers by bringing in women? I am reading an article right now by a female mathematician who is probably not a stupid person. I can’t help but notice a tone in her language that implies that male-centric cultures are naturally evil and that men have ‘inflated’ views of themselves. She also complains about men making sexual passes at her in the workplace. Have you ever seen a club filled up with true nerds? Like a chess club or a group that plays some other fantasy themed board game? I have, women won’t set foot in such a place, believe me. So they make tech sound like one of these places, yet still desire to be in there, which makes no sense to me.

        Like

      • oink says:

        women follow.

        in your case she complains because she’s approached boring betabux, not alphafux

        as to inflated view of self, illogical self-confidence is the sine-qua-non of success in ANY field.

        Like

      • oink says:

        if nerds would approach females with the same confidence they approach an DiffEq problem or a 100 level monster in WoW they’d be crushing it.

        Like

      • martin says:

        that’s a mighty interesting way of explaining the attraction/repulsion phenomenon women have with tech nerds.

        Like

    • elmer says:

      Tech has provided millions of women with good paying jobs. The worst thing for women who actually work in tech is Womyn in Tech.

      Like

      • martin says:

        yes, that is true. But to point out the bigger picture, tech seems to have a strong appeal to women, and womyn alike. There just isn’t a strong push for more women in other less nice, prestigious, and rewarding jobs that contain high percentages of women so I don’t believe things are the life or death matter they make them out to be, there is some deeper psychological crisis going on that I want to get to the heart of to create a better “shiv” with specifically for the tech career women claiming discrimination. This is important for a variety of reasons. One reason is that these women rely on the stereotype that male-centric cultures are intrinsically evil. They rely on this stereotype of the men in tech teaming up to commit evil. But the way they do it is very subtle. That men digest the belief that men are more evil is one problem, that they must conjure up a conspiracy to harass, hurt, and belittle women is another. There are a lot of men out there in tech that are victims to this and its gone on for too long.

        Like

      • martin says:

        *higher percentages of men not women

        Like

      • elmer says:

        martin, you will enjoy my soon to be released ebook which rips the lid off women’s inhumanity to women in the tech world, with practical grooming tips and winning phrases for executing workplace game like a pro.

        Like

  37. Returning to the subjects of observing and gaming women for a small moment…

    CH,

    See the following for apples to apples photo-testing of aged hot women (43) versus a young woman (14) in bikinis below —

    Babe watch! Brooke Burke, 43, shows off her toned body in a skimpy striped bikini while splashing around the Malibu surf

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3179023/Brooke-Burke-43-shows-toned-body-skimpy-striped-bikini-splashing-Malibu-surf.html

    There is a photo of age 43-something Brooke Burke out on the beach with her 14-year old daughter, both in bikinis, with both holding the same surf board above their heads.

    You can see the age difference in skin texture between Brooke Burke and her 14-year old daughter, especially around the hands, feet, elbows, knees and lower arms, with a glance at a distance.

    Score another for “Biomechanics are God”.

    Like

    • oink says:

      grandma is photoshopped to the smithereens there.

      Like

      • Experienced Father says:

        >>grandma is photoshopped to the smithereens there.

        Photo shopping can’t hide the fact that 14-year old Neriah’s skin looks better than 43-year old Momma Brooke’s.

        NB: Neriah’s hands, feet, elbows, knees and lower arms don’t lie, even if photo shopped Brooke’s do.

        Like

    • PWN says:

      What I find funny is that her body is entirely achievable for regular women. My mother had three children and looked better in her early 40s body wise than many American women in their 20s. Found some old pics with me as a kid at the beach and noticed that. Then I remember we wanted to move to a new place years after those pics and the realtor kept hitting on my mom. lol

      Like

      • Experienced Father says:

        >>What I find funny is that her body is entirely achievable for regular women.

        ^True that.

        But even Brooke Burke — with all the HGH shots, plastic surgery, derm-abrasion therapy, high end skin hydration creams and Botox treatments available in Hollywood — still cannot hide her skin age standing next to her 14-year old daughter.

        Biomechanics are a Jealous God.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        That was YOUR mom?

        Like

      • 88 says:

        @ Experienced Father

        “still cannot hide her skin age standing next to her 14-year old daughter.”

        yeah no kidding. but come on. most of us aren’t as rich, as successful, or as good looking as most celebrities either. we all age, we are all flawed.

        no point bashing on women who actually do the work to look good when there are so many who don’t.

        in real life most of us would be thrilled to have wives as good looking as brooke burke. besides, that daughter of hers may have smooth young skin but that’s about it. she only has cleavage because of her arm positioning. underdeveloped breasts are not good. and that face? nothing pretty about that. young? sure. but everyone ages. rather have older and hot than young and ugly. because those young and uglies sure don’t get better as they age.

        Like

      • Mac says:

        @Experienced Father

        kind of agree with 88 on this one. you sound bitter. kind of like all those fat ugly women we make of fun for criticizing hot women.

        Like

      • PWN says:

        Of course that aging is inevitable and nothing can reverse it or mask it(yet anyway). But the reality is that so many young girls are slovenly that committed older women can look better than them. It’s pathetic and there’s no excuse for it. Even as a guy, for example, you might not go to the gym, but doing 200 pushups and 100 situps a day isn’t that hard.

        I’m just glad that being male means aging doesn’t matter as much. I have a bunch of white hairs I didn’t expect until later, but I think I’ll look awesome when there will be more of them than now.

        This being said, I tried a new game with a couple of girls. You’re supposed to take turns saying 2 truths about you and one lie and you lose if she guesses the lie and win if she mistakenly picks a truth to be the lie. Then she says 2 truths about her and one lie and you guess.

        Like

      • Experienced Father says:

        >>no point bashing on women who actually do the work to look
        >>good when there are so many who don’t.
        >>
        >>in real life most of us would be thrilled to have wives as good
        >>looking as brooke burke.

        Brooke Burke has had five public relationships, an unknown number of private relationships/flings, three marriages, and four children — two each — by her last two husbands.

        See:

        http://www.celebmarriages.com/brooke-burke-marriages-weddings-engagements-divorces-relationships/

        She is Exhibit A of Hypergamy 101

        No argument that she is much better looking than the average woman, but she still — obviously — sees herself in the Hollywood sexual market place.

        See Whorefinder’s analysis regards her kids in public and her lack of empathy for same.

        Like

    • whorefinder says:

      I have to say it was pretty nasty of Burke to set up this “candid,unexpected, totally not planned” photoshoot with her children, especially her post-pubescent daughter in a bikini.

      I get that celebrities lack empathy on the most part, but still, give your kids privacy, especially when underage. They shouldn’t be props for you to raise your Q rating.

      It’s also nasty because Burke was clearly desiring to get people to compare her thinner, more toned body with her tubbier daughter’s. “ooh, look, Brooke looks even better than her daughter, ageism is a social construct, sexual prime is middle age, baby!”

      Glad to see though that the Chateau readers recognized that the daughter clearly looked more fertile, and that Brooke’s body was merely in shape. Knock down on her looking to fish for compliments.

      Brooke Burke rape!

      Like

    • KP says:

      Am I supposed to recognize this name or something?

      Like

  38. CH,

    The best rhetoric is the simplest. “Yes, but…”

    Saneman: “Why do African-Americans have an 85 IQ?”

    Limpwrist: “Oh my God, that’s racist! I can’t believe you said that!”

    Saneman: “Yes, but why do African-Americans have an 85 IQ?”

    Limpwrist: “There’s no such thing as biological race, you bigot!”

    Saneman: “Yes, but why do African-Americans have an 85 IQ?”

    Like

    • James Blonde says:

      Yeah but at some point, like bed bugs, you hafta decide what to do about them?

      Don’t forget, the goal of talk radio is…?

      TO KEEP ON TALKIN.

      Like

    • Arbiter says:

      Exactly AL, that’s the Ignore & Plow tactic. This is something people forget too often, and they allow the leftist to move to another subject. He might throw out the “racist” label and you angrily respond to that, so then you are discussing “racism” instead, which is exactly what he wants. Instead, stick to the fact that he is trying to move away from.

      Like

    • whorefinder says:

      At one point they will scream and go and grab others to attempt to shame you into silence. Especially if they can grab black people.

      Total rabbit 101: attempt to outgroup you to stop badfeels and crimethink.

      rabbit tactic rape!

      Like

  39. Guest says:

    There will be a dollar per jew, CH.

    Like

    • anonymous says:

      Speaking of England, in 1290, King Edward I issued an edict expelling all Jews from England. The expulsion edict remained in force for the rest of the Middle Ages.

      Economically, Jews played a key role in the country. The church at the time strictly forbade the lending of money for profit. This created a vacuum in the economy of Europe that Jews filled due to extreme discrimination in every other economic area; canon law was not considered applicable to Jews, and Judaism permits loans with interest between Jews and non-Jews.[4] As a consequence, some Jews made large amounts of money.

      Jews acquired a reputation as extortionate moneylenders which made them extremely unpopular with both the church and the general public.

      What a surprise.

      Like

    • anonymous says:

      In 1992, in a ceremony marking the 500th anniversary of the Edict of Expulsion, King Juan Carlos (wearing a skullcap) prayed alongside Israeli president Chaim Herzog and members of the Jewish community in the Beth Yaacov Synagogue. The King said: ‘Sefarad (the Hebrew name for Spain) is no longer nostalgia, but a place where Jews should not be told to feel as if at home [a customary greeting to guests in Spain], because Hispano-Jews are at home in Spain. What matters … is the desire to analyse and project the past in regards to our future.'[27]

      From November 2012 Sephardic Jews have had the right to automatic Spanish nationality without the requirement of residence in Spain.

      Prior to November 2012, Sephardic Jews already had the right to obtain Spanish citizenship after a reduced residency period of two years (versus ten years for foreigners). While their citizenship is being processed, Sephardic Jews are entitled to the consular protection of the Kingdom of Spain.[28]

      This makes Spain the only nation besides Israel that currently grants automatic citizenship to the descendants of Jews expelled during the European medieval evictions.

      Like

  40. A.F.O.R. says:

    Valuable advice CH. Great suggestions

    Like

  41. G. L. o’ P. #9: “Win through your actions, never through argument.”
    Why argue with vermin about culture, society? Only issue in play by convention is pecking order right there in person. Don’t engage them like they have fellowship value unless you are using them. Stop caring about systemic social matters beyond your control = all of them. Let go. You don’t have producer property rights. Save larger scope concerns for online sharing if that. The herd autoimmune response will get you if you vibe cultural value and concerns. Don’t do that. Systemically logical responses in verbage may allow the civilized to i.d. each other w/o triggering immune reflex. Be a more complete man. You’ll need it.

    Like

  42. Rudeman says:

    What’s with the lefties going full libtard about someone killing a lion? People I know on Facebook are wishing him dead and looking to ruin his life on Facebook.

    As if that lion didn’t hunt, kill and eat thousands of animals in it’s life.

    Nor do they even want to organize to ban the hunting in Zinabawe so that future lions aren’t hunted.

    They just want to ruin a man’s life or have him killed and they think they are in the full moral right because they have the “correct view”.

    When the shit hits the fan I know there are plenty of “friends” who are the enemy of a normal society and I will certainly be of no aid to them and be happy if they are dispatched for the betterment of civilization.

    Like

  43. elmer says:

    Well it looks like having “bias” is the new thoughtcrime. Amazing how these lemmings will parrot each other.

    Like

  44. Hugo Stiglitz says:

    Worth a read:

    http://www.thisblogisdangerous.com/we-do-not-debate-with-the-left/

    Clicking on this link will most likely put you on (another) watch list.

    Like

  45. Waffles says:

    There’s a connection to modern day society in here somewhere I think

    http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/gm-mosquitoes-set-be-released-brazil-combat-dengue-0

    Like

  46. tteclod says:

    “Whatever you say, Mr. Goldman. How’s your girl, what’s-her-name? Nicole?”

    Like

  47. James Blonde says:

    coming Cosby deposition; woman will describe Cosby raping her in the 1970s at the Playboy mansion when she was 15.

    Like

  48. Johannes Balileo Balilei says:

    Game is seduction. You can’t seduce a leftoid and probably a cuckservative neither. You can’t convince them of nothing about red pill. There is a Politic Values Market, where sheepawns buy a peaceful lifestyle and a welfare from mainstream and/or a clear conscience from their insanely altruistic white mind. Those who don’t buy it and get an alternative will be penalised with isolation.
    Unfortunately the latest guy who play well in PVM would have killed me by my surname.
    The thing that you are doing is more like argue against a wall. A doublethink 2+2=5 zombie sheepawn wall.

    Like

  49. dirkdiggly says:

    O/t but amusing all the same: had a great reframe/lemonade from lemons experience at the library today.

    Cutie in a glass windowed study room catches my eye as I walk past. I smirk big at her, only to walk right into a concrete pillar (slowly, but it hurt nonetheless). Reeling from sudden shame and pain on display, I pulled a fist dramatically down from the sky with a mouthed “yusssss” and then made the “call me?” gesture. She laughed hard, recovered, and…blew me a kiss!

    Charlie Chaplin silent movie game?

    Like

  50. 70 million views and you “reward” us with that gif.

    Like

  51. ms00 says:

    Speaking of politics and “confidence” – Confidence gives you the freedom to makes mistakes and cope with “failure”.

    Like

  52. Karmageddon says:

    Well, well, welly well well…

    Strong men more likely to have right-wing views, study reveals

    http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/fitness/strong-men-more-likely-to-have-right-wing-views-study-reveals/story-fneuzle5-1226644975491

    Like

  53. James Blonde says:

    Black people are seen as representatives of the forces of chaos and disorder;

    amirite?

    Like

  54. KermitTheeFrog777 says:

    Idea for some linguistic warfare. Disarm the phrase “check your privilege” by turning it into an inane hashtag meme used to humblebrag on material gains. Similar to #Blessed.

    E.g.

    [Pic looking DAFT (dapper as fuck tho)]
    New suit, good fit.
    #CheckYourPrivilege

    [Pic of my new Toll Road speed lane pass]
    I got my own lane, bish.
    #CheckYourPrivilege

    [Pic in da club sporting mah nu GRILLZ]
    #CheckYourPrivilege

    The power of ideology lies in symbols, including language. The only way to diminish that power is to dilute it.

    Like

    • mendozatorres says:

      Very clean. I like this tactic. In fact, it’s more fitting than “Blessed” which has become bastardized.

      Like

  55. Johannes Balileo Balilei says:

    There isn’t game in politics. Game is seduction. You can’t seduce a sheepawn worshiper of the mainstream social order. Dat shit bro is because there is a Politic Thoughts Market Value. Hivemind offers social integration, welfare, social comfort and security, and only for whites a clear conscience. Most people buy it. What does the red pill offer?? A painful truth in which the 85% of world people are betas, mentally disabled, or just people who can not live against the system, the idea of a perishable or life without free will.
    Altough I don’t like it, the latest guy who played very well in PTMV would have killed me by my real surname.

    Like

  56. Johannes Balileo Balilei says:

    When will CH owners come back to twitter??

    Like

  57. drexelscott7 says:

    The best way to fight liberal non-thinking is to go after their emotions. Not their logic, not their lack of honesty and not by reminding them of facts. One must humiliate the liberal, and humiliate him or her, or “it” if it’s a tranny (which let’s be honest, it probably is) so badly and so thoroughly that the actions you take and the words you speak only hurt one small fraction of the emotional pain that occurs when everyone in the room looks at them condescendingly. That is the kind of shame that is the only way to shut them up.

    For example,

    You: “The black on white crime rate is absurdly high”

    It: “Oh yeah, is that what they said at your last Klan meeting?”

    You: (Big smile to someone else in the room while pointing at the offender in a “that was so adorable, did you hear that? kind of way before changing the topic and taking control of the conversation)

    If their eyes cast downwards or they explode in anger and stomp out of the room, then the missile hit its target.

    Like

Leave a Reply