Feed on
Posts
Comments

Jerkboy Charisma Chat Game

What’s the quickest way to turn on a girl with the least amount of effort? Ellipsis game? Yeah, that’s pretty low effort. But this example of what I like to call JERKBOY CHARISMA chat game may trump ellipsis game in the race to the brusque bottom. A reader forwards his chivalrous courtship to a Juliet he hasn’t seen in a month:

This is what it looks like when a woman is chasing a man, and the man is reclining in the chased after position. This is how you want it to look for maximum romantic success. If it looks like this, you’re doing it right.

“But she said she hates him!?!,” wail the women and the men impersonating women.

If you’ve learned anything from reading CH, you know that a woman’s hate is not the opposite of a woman’s love. Indifference is the opposite of love. When a woman says she “hates” you, what she’s really saying is she hates that she loves what you do to her. Hate is just a conveniently accessible word to describe the rush of pleasing emotions, drama-larding cognitive dissonance and twatly ensconced tingles that a woman feels when a man expertly teases her and signals his total disregard for her approval.

I expect a deluge of men running wordless emoji game on women now. Why blab your betatude when a funny picture sends a thousand alpha waves?

99 Responses to “Jerkboy Charisma Chat Game”

  1. Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh says:

    Have your cat and eat it, too.

  2. maurice says:

    That pic is a little childish and silly, but it’s also funny as hell and right on point. This is a whole other arena for text game- funny cartoons, which handily trump emoticons. I actually have no idea how to access a bank of pics like that on an iPhone- never thought about it before. But this, in theory and practice, has the potential (depending on the image) to be better than the usual CH recommendations in this area, “…”, “gay” (very ineffective), etc. The right pic, in context, will show smarts and humor as well as indifference.

    When a woman says she “hates” you, what she’s really saying is she hates that she loves what you do to her.

    This is great- a very wise aphorism. Ought to be convered to a CH maxim at some point.

    • Hugh G. Rection says:

      I think these cartoons come with Facebook Messenger. It’s very low effort.

    • haunted trilobite says:

      Better off just handing your imagination completely over to computers

      • Matthew King says:

        Emoticons aren’t a substitute for imagination. They are an attempt to inject body language and tone back into the one-dimensional communication of text.

        Besides, the sheer number of words required to “paint a picture” for her is restricted by the medium itself (and by alpha “aloofness” in general). None of it can work unless and until you establish your presence off the medium so that she can interpret your verbosity/spare speaking correctly.

        The bigger problem is their cartoonishness. Absent a proper context, they make you look like a silly 12-year-old girl. That too can be elided, but never without providing the right translation key through establishing a proper, external frame of reference.

        Like the texter fellow did above. If a beta orbiter sent her a fat cat photo, the response would have been very different.

        Matt

  3. Reservoir Tip says:

    Classy broad he’s chasing there. It makes me sad. Everyone these days is so doped up on shit it’s crazy. Whether the substances are legal or illegal makes no difference.

    If you’re a guy who can’t pull sober then you’re doing it wrong. I’ve never been drunk or high, and all my learning and practice has been done sober.

    And for the girl, it just validates not putting a girl on a pedestal yet again. She’s probably pretty hot, yet she throws her time, money, and state of mind away on drugs. Always assume the worst of people, that way they can’t let you down.

    • Anonymous says:

      > “Everyone these days is so doped up on shit it’s crazy. ”

      To his credit, that San Francisco Jew, Michael “Savage” Wiener, has been hammering home this point for years – that normal folks just can’t understand true leftoids [“Red Diaper Doper Babies”, as Savage calls them] because normal folks aren’t narked-up out of their minds on every possible pharmacological substance known to mankind.

      Until you’re completely high on SSRIs and benzodiazipines and Ambien and coke and meth and peyote and rubbing alcohol, it’s very difficult to “think” like a Leftist.

    • Hugh G. Rection says:

      Whether the substances are legal or illegal makes no difference.

      Why should it? Even kids get prescribed Adderal which is pretty much pharmaceutical grade meth.

      If you’re a guy who can’t pull sober then you’re doing it wrong. I’ve never been drunk or high, and all my learning and practice has been done sober.

      Fully agreed. Forming this habit of liquid courage can be quite dangerous, and it limits your choice of venues. That being said, I see nothing wrong with getting drunk or high for time to time.

    • RyanS says:

      Get off my lawn! You sound like a drag, honestly. “Never been drunk or high” – you a Muslim?

      Doing drugs on weekends does not make someone “lose their state of mind” except in the moment they are on it. Now, this chick doesn’t sound like she’s worth all that much but that’s because she’s suing drugs as a selling point for the guy she wants to impress. Desperate. The drugs themselves aren’t the problem

  4. Anonymous says:

    hey guys, thats me in the chat. its on facebook, just click the smiley icon in the bottom right of the window.

    also, reservoir, while i agree one should be able to pull sober, there is certainly a time and a place for being drunk, and high. drugs are tasty, unclench your buttcheeks and live a little.

    everything in moderation, including moderation itself.

    • Anonymous says:

      So how do you “reply” with “emoticons”?

    • Grim says:

      Drugs are baaaad. ‘Mkaaay?

      • Patriarch says:

        You can also save up quite a few images for texting by simply google imaging then saving to your smartphone for different opportunities.

        • Hugh G. Rection says:

          That’s the kind of effort I wouldn’t put into it.

          • Patriarch says:

            Don’t be afraid to come down and join us mere mortals.

          • burke says:

            doesn’t take much effort, a tumbleweed animated gif for her shitty jokes and then a wiener wearing shades (from hello ladies) for just about anything else.

          • Matthew King says:

            Exactly. Mirrored silliness mocks them for being a girl, but it also reinforces their girlishness, which is a good frame of mind to excite.

            These junior high communication tools can be deployed like a sushi master’s knife kit. Be a sashimi artist and carve up some snapper.

          • Patriarch says:

            Giggling lubricates their hip joints.

    • Reservoir Tip says:

      Dude, I don’t need that shit in order to “live a little,” and it’s bullshit to think you do.

      The reality is that people who engage in recreational drug use are almost always using the high as some sort of crutch for something else that’s lacking in their lives, whether it’s daddy issues, absent parents, lack of confidence sober, or whatever other issues.

      Drugs are something I have zero fucking tolerance for. If everyone got off all the shit they were on, again, be it legal or illegal, we’d all be better off because of it.

      How can you be a productive member of society if you “need” twelve different kinds of anti-depressants to function? And you can’t have a good time without getting wasted or getting high? Grow up.

    • Troubadour says:

      I agree about living a little and not having a stick up your ass, but I’ve seen a lot of good guys go swirling down the toilet over coke. Moderation seems hard to apply, and some slopes are too slippery to fuck with. I’ll just get drunk, thanks.

      The pattern with coke seems to be:

      Phase 1: Do a little blow, party down, have fun.

      Phase 2: Want more blow than you can afford, invent ways to embezzle money.

      Phase 3: Get busted for embezzling $50,000 or more and go up the river.

      I wonder what it says about my friends that I’ve seen this pattern unfold three separate times.

    • Matthew King says:

      hey guys, that’s me in the chat.

      Describe the girl.

  5. Grave Di666er says:

    Ladies and gentleman I present to you the Chicago’s very own living legend Crazy Cooter.

    • Crazy Cooter says:

      oh ya. should prob make an account here ive lingered long enough. this is coot sigining in

  6. tang3zang says:

    >harassively

    K.

    I tend to notice that women in general, not just girlfriends, value you more if you don’t talk too much to them. Not in the sense of engaging them in discussion, but being overly verbose or explanatory seems to make them lose respect for you. Not sure why.

  7. darkhorse says:

    Looking through YaReally’s archive, I realized that being comfortably sexual in my texts was a clear piece of my game I had let slide. When I was younger, this wasn’t the case. I was shameless, and there a bunch of times I would actually get girls to say, come over, I’m ready to bang. (Sidenote: This is unlikely to work on an 8 or a above).

    Over the past week I decided to made my texts a lot more sexual, with the goal of resuscitating pick ups whose action had died off or gone sideways. Overall, I think the results of sexualizing my text messages were pretty positive, but I definitely could work on what YaReally calls “calibration”.

    Here’s the first vignette…

    Girl 1
    Beautiful 8. Early 20s. Works in fashion. Street pick up. Heavy hook up months ago. Took *me* into a bathroom and declared “I can’t do this”, I ejected out of the situation – something just didn’t feel right. Sideways texting once a month or so. Fully aware I’m seeing someone else. She has a serious boyfriend.

    Text Snapshot:

    Me: Don’t tell that boy you were with that you’re infatuated with me. You’ll break his heart.
    Her: I’m hanging out near your neighborhood today. Come by and see me at (X place).
    Me: I’m not groping you in public
    Her: What is up with you today? I’ll pretend like this last text was never sent or was a joke because otherwise it would be disrespectful especially given the situation where there has really been no situation.

    (Her shaming tone caught me off-guard. I wasn’t really sure what to do. Had three options: not responding, tell her I was just a joking, or let her know that I’m comfortable being insolent. I decided to own my words and not back down.)

    Me: Disrespect is more my forte than comedy

    (Her response flipped by wig.)

    her: Get a laugh out of it?

    an hour later…

    her: Will you still be in the area around for drink at 10? I’m with my girl friends and want to see you.

    I tell her no, and give her another option to meet late night. The logistics don’t work. There are no other options on the table. She gets a bit miffed, reminds me (and herself) she has a boyfriend and declares that my tone isn’t funny.

  8. darkhorse says:

    Girl 2
    Pretty 8. Bar pick up. Think she may be the ex of an entertainer or athlete. Tells me her romantic life is “complicated”. Sends me bikini pics any way. Body is legit. Not officially aware aware I’m seeing someone else, but we haven’t met since I got her number. Sends me bikini pics on request. Invited her out then canceled on her. We had a decently strong text vibe going, but not sexual before recent exchange. Could sense connection dying.

    Text Snapshot:

    Me: what are you do Fri after Thanksgiving?
    Her: hi sorry crazy at work the Friday after?
    Me: as long as you use the extra two weeks to lingerie shop
    Her: did you send that to the wrong person lol?
    Me: nah
    Her: what the extra week about?
    Me: I can check my sched to see if I can take advantage of you if you’re in a rush
    Her: i’ll get back to you on that
    Me: how sweet of you. Thinking red would be the hottest lingerie color on you.
    Her: red is fitting

    View that as my greenlight to solidify plans. We do. Tells me she’s bringing her friend. I tell her one on one is better, and a threeway so soon is moving too fast for me. Sexualizing text communication seems to have revived things.

  9. darkhorse says:

    Girl 3
    Pretty 7.5. Street pick up. Part time ring girl five years ago, lots of beta orbiters. Really fit, but, in early 30s. Would be a solid 8 if she were taller and more elegant rather than aerobics instructor build. Light hook-up months ago. Text have always gone sideways. Super flaky, solipsistic type. Fully aware I’m seeing someone.

    Text Snapshot:

    Me: Let’s meet up soon.
    Her: Will that girl you’re seeing let you?
    Me: Stop pushing your way into a manage
    Her: You’re way too much
    Me: I prefer to call it well endowed, but if you insist
    Her: That’s great, but why you feel I need to know is beyond me
    Me: So you can improve the authenticity of your fantasies about me
    Her: You’re crazy. Seriously.
    Me: We should hang out soon. I promise not to take advantage of you in public.
    Her; Cool, when is good for you?

  10. darkhorse says:

    Girl 4
    Sexy 7.5. Bar pick up. Ex-entertainment personality. Early 30s. Took her out, second date bang some years back, cut her off immediately thereafter. Annoying attention whore, hate spending time with her. Reaches out to me on a monthly basis, “want drinks tonight?”. Answer is always no. Agreed to meet up with her two months ago when she was engaged. Finger-banged her, drops engagement a week later. She confesses she was really into me after I banged. I’ve never had any romantic feelings for her. Knows I’m seeing someone.

    Text Snapshot:

    Her: I’m going to be at X late night, want to come out?

    (typical reach out, can count on one a month.)

    Me: Can’t now. Sex gossiping.
    Her: Ok, wanna meet for drinks at 9 at Y?
    Me: Can’t. X is a great place to get into late night trouble though.
    Her: I’m not looking for trouble. I’m kind of seeing someone someone and he’s amazing.
    Me: It’s not fair of you to fantasize about me when you’re sleeping with him.
    Her: Ha ha ha.
    Her: I thought we were cool and could friends.
    Me: we can’t. you’re attracted to me.
    Her: ok, I’m not, but ok!

    (I thought that was particularly funny after she’s reached out to me intermittently over four years.)

    Me. You love it when I’m inside you.

    (Overshot the calibration on that one. Radio silence after.)

  11. Bonus points if someone can do this to an HB8 that he met off cold approach and she is neutral/lukewarm towards him after running the set and doing a shaky number close.

    • Scray says:

      Super triple bonus points if she isn’t a neurotic coke fiend lol.

      • RyanS says:

        This broad doesn’t sound like a fiend. Sound like it was her first time and she was reporting the effects to this guy to try to impress him (“I tried coke like you said!”)

      • Scray says:

        lol maybe. the girl just doesn’t seem like my cup of tea.

        • Anonymous says:

          Word up. I wot act judgmental when it comes to drugs but there is something to be said about a girl that does blow.

          I have a theory that the more often a girl is prone to doing coke, the more likely she will be hypergamous and likely to cheat on you. It’s like the want to get high like that is correlated to a want to cheat on your SO.

          I’ve seen a good bit in I lived in Miami and this held true with my bros that went to waspy schools in the northeast, in addition to my few years so far in NYC.

          Straight up, if your girl does blow more than once a month or actively seeks it out, treat her like a hoe and be vigilant on her hypergamous ways.

          Word up to the girl who got naked in the living room back in undergrad because my boys had the powder.

          • Sigma Male says:

            “I have a theory …”

            Word up let’s dig deeper.

            A girl–particularly White girls–who sample coke and/or routinely sample diverse (I hate that word) cock, has her deficiency rooted in the relationship, or, lack-there-of, with her father and, by extension, the television and all its vapid nonsense; addiction to the second should be understood as an indictment of the first.

            Let’s briefly explore the two conditions that must be met for a girl to slide into drug use, sluttery and, further: mudsharkery:

            1) The relationship to her father must be damaged, either emotionally, physically, or, both. All pathologies, e.g., dispositional whorishness, miscegenation, flower from a perversion of this crucial father/daughter bond.

            Observe: The above condition necessitates the second.

            2) The strength of her relationship with the television must be covalent in nature, a bond forged through paternal failure.

            The TV teaches lessons her weak father never contradicts: that appearances are more important than reality, that Africans and, to a lesser degree, other non-Whites, are the *dominant genotypes–over time, this myth disables and rewires her attraction mechanisms to such a degree her hypergamy can be satisfied by favor of the other–that feminism is about equal pay, that the White skin she wears is evidence of evil and must be atoned through pathological altruism, the ultimate sacrifice being the surrender of her womb on the alter of diversity.

            The resident coal burner, Amy, is a tragic illustration of the above conditions being satisfied. [Amy, if you read this and have a reflexive tingle to respond, don’t. Queef elsewhere. You’ve already outed yourself upon your arrival in the comment section some month ago. Save face and save your “Et Tus” for lesser men. Just sit there in shame and think about what you’ve done.]

            Now, I’m not implying females lack agency. What I am implying is that a healthy expression of her agency, in adolescence and beyond, is wholly dependent on her father’s leadership, particularity in her formative years.

            *Males are susceptible to this myth, too. In particular those males whose experience with mulattoes and Africans can be quantified by the time he spends watching television.

          • Smegma Male: If you don’t have something nice to say, there’s probably a reason. You.

          • Reservoir Tip says:

            Both factors also feed into a girl’s proclivity towards being “bi” or “lesbian.”

          • corvinus says:

            The idiot box is a factor, but a decreasingly relevant one. If anything, the public school system is an even worse libtardery generator.

  12. darkhorse says:

    Girl 5
    8. Early 20s. Fashion model. Club pick up. Poor English skills. Light rapport. Knows I have a primary girl. Asked her to hang via text before, got no answer.

    Text Snapshot:

    (Went pedal to the medal calibration on this one…)

    Me: I kind of want to bang you.
    Her: What does bang mean?
    Me: It means I was fuck you. I guess that’s not in your dictionary.
    Me: ha, ok.

    (And that was it. Interesting that the sex got her to engage kind of quickly, but calibration was lacking. Too much too fast.)

  13. darkhorse says:

    Conclusion on making text communication more sexual:

    The five examples I gave earlier were all applications used on girls pulled via one-on-one cold approaches. The examples show how sexualizing your texts/communication is an important component of game.
    While not a magic bullet for every case, sexualizing text can be an effective way to move a relationship toward a bang.

    The basic thing to understand is, that If a girl is actually attracted to you, then sexualizing your texts makes communication a lot more interesting than ho-hum, “how as your day” texts, or “I’m so charming/smooth/cool” banter that is more like to move the interaction sideways than toward the bedroom.
    The implication here, is that the girl already has to like you somewhat for the sexual text to be impactful. If she’s not attracted to you already your texts are just going to be viewed as pervy.

    Some things to look for:

    Tone:
    Be playful, don’t be crude (unless it escalates to that point and she’s asking for you to be crude.). You’ll probably ruin the shot at the lay if you’re too vulgar on the offset.

    Responsiveness:
    You’re likely to see an uptick in responsiveness, with reply backs often happening a minute after your get into a rhythm of playful sexual texts. If you’re getting no response, consider it a sign and realized that she probably has no sexual attraction to you. Also, don’t hammer away with multiple sexual texts if. It’s pervy and you don’t want to harass the poor girl if she doesn’t like you.

    Rebuffing and Qualification:
    It’s a good sign if the girl inquisitively responds, playing dumb. Girls are socialized to be coy, so even if she’s attracted to you, expect her to rebuff sexualized texts and ask you to qualify them. “oh really? / you must have the wrong girl / aren’t you in a relationship / etc.” This is often a test to see how shameless you really are, and if you have the confidence to follow through on your declaration. She may repeat this stance repeatedly to test if you are actually standing by your words or if you are going to wimp out.

    Logistics:
    After establishing some sexual rhythm, and realizing you’re confident with yourself as a sexual being, she’s likely accept your offer meet up, or even propose a place to meet (see example number one above). A lot of times these plans will be logistical minefields, because the girl wants to bang but doesn’t want to be a labeled a slut, so the logistics she proposes express the emotionally polarity. You can see that pattern played out in two of the emails above. Here’s another example: I remember once telling a girl to meet me at a club and the dress code was no panties. She said no way, I said ok, then she texted me days later asking me to meet up at a bar with her girlfriend. I told her no. Then she got furious and accused me of hating women. She was really pissed because I hadn’t sorted out the logistics for her, which really is your job as a man. You have to be really sensitive with the logistics and present the girl with an alternative option to hers otherwise she’ll squawk at you for screwing everything up and it will be game over.

    • walawala says:

      I have a simple way of sexualizing…

      The conversation goes like this:

      You: hey crazy girl [insert plan here}

      Her: blah blah blah (flake)

      You: k, if we meet up again you’re buying

      Her: No way…blah blah blah

      You: behave, or it’s the naughty corner

      At this point…90% of girls will ask:

      “What’s the naughty corner?”

      That’s your cue to sexualize.

      From my read of your texts the girls are lukewarm or just playing along. They don’t seem invested.

      The “It’s the naughty corner for you…”

      Her: “I’m nice”

      You: Right, it’s the quiet ones who are the most trouble

      her: blah blah blah

      you get the idea.

      Credit goes to Krauser for this exchange or the content of it.

  14. Mrs. KTC says:

    “When a woman says she “hates” you, what she’s really saying is she hates that she loves what you do to her. ” Brillant

  15. Heywhat says:

    When you look at the “hate you” in the context of the exchange it comes across immediately as non-serious. She probably laughed at the cat.

    • AlphaBeta says:

      I agree. The I hate you in this context is definitely the equivalent of when you tease a girl and she punches you in the arm.

      Legitimate hate –like what I described in the comments a few posts back when that ex of mine had me kicked out of that party bc I stopped talking to her — I’m not so sure.

  16. Grim says:

    I can’t relate to this because I have never wasted time with a girl who needed to lose 15 pounds. Seriously. This garbage does not work on a 9 who weighs 115. For real. Two types of lines of game here. One is for kids who apparently game drug-addicted fatties. I have no doubt this hog is tatted up too.

  17. Grim says:

    Hmm http://m.designntrend.com/articles/9405/20131129/mere-presence-males-shortens-females-lifespan-yes-true-roundworms.htm

    CH could some related evolutionary blip explain why women hate men so much? And make no mistake they hate us. They tolerate us (until they get unhaaaaaaappy) only because doing so is necessary for their survival. They do not want us around. That’s why getting them is like pulling teeth.

    • Patriarch says:

      Women don’t hate men. In fact everything in their life is geared towards finding a man who is strong enough to enslave her.
      You’re projecting your disdain for the ways of women onto them, assuming that they see the world in the way that you do.

    • Scray says:

      This is the kind of comment that makes me go wtf. I’d say the best thing to do is to take a step back. Think about how a man views the world versus the way a woman views the world. Both need one another — or at least they complement one another. But ya, they’re different. So instead of expecting women to adhere to logic, rationality, self-control, etc. etc. look at those traits as something to impart onto her and guide her with. That’s why they dig frame control and dominance. They look for someone else to trust with “that sort of thing.”

      • Patriarch says:

        Well said Scray.
        Alot of guys move from being completely convinced of girls being sweet delicate little flowers to full blown “omg theyre fucking evil” at the first hint of exposure to true female nature.

        • Grim says:

          I’ve had more than a first hint. I’ve had about 260 hints so now I get it.

          • Fun now. You’ve fucked 260 chix, guessing you meant you’ve fucked 260 girls, which means you chose not to/were unable to form a lasting bond with any of the subset of those 260 who were willing and able to form a mutually supportive relationship.

            Oh wait ALL WOMEN ARE HEARTLESS VAMPIRES so not ONE of the 260 had a tolerably solicitous personality. And the problem isn’t you! You’re a man, a logical, honorable man with good taste who would NEVER look at a girl 15 lbs overweight. You’re really special.

            I just don’t believe that’s as likely as the hypothesis YOU are some kind of personality disordered freak with zero insight that due to high verbal intelligence you’ve continued to rationalize your PREFERENCE for not relating to ANYONE and staying in your narcissistic reverie. ( demanding perfection all around you. At least perfection in EVERYONE ELSE BUT YOU.)

            Maybe the problem is you, not all the wizened princesses and models who now have a clear memory of the psychopaths who couldn’t love them.

          • Scray says:

            lol bullshit.

          • Grim says:

            Children, where did I say I have that many bangs? God I can’t stand you stupid kids. Try remedial reading class.

      • Grim says:

        If you try to guide them, the law and Huffington Post (ALL women see Huff Post as their Bible) tell them you are controlling, jealous and possessive. And our fucked up modern law lets them snap their fingers to put a man in jail. Don’t you get it?

        • Patriarch says:

          Grim,
          I’m going to assume you aren’t trolling.
          That being said, I do get what youre saying.
          I live in the same world you do. I’m going to even go out on a branch and assume you’re American like I am. The problem is your neediness. It is bleeding out of your post. Go back through the CH archives and read, read, read.
          Women aren’t evil, they’re simply ammoral from a male point of view. Her biological imperative is just like yours, to successfully reproduce, but her strategies couldn’t be any more alien to yours. Deal with it, it’s reality.

          • Grim says:

            Men are supposed to possess their lover. Huff Post has taught them the opposite of truth. They snap their fingers and a 3-year lover is immediately a stalker, even if she plasters herself all over the web for strangers from here to Saudi Arabia to rub one out to.

          • Grim says:

            And I am not trolling. I speak truth here. Look dude I can get laid and be charming and even do ONSs too. I’m talking about long term societal issues. Reading Huffington Post and realizing that all modern young women get their marching orders from there is literally enough to make a red pill aware man vomit.

          • Patriarch says:

            If you’re on the redpill it shouldn’t surprise you at all of where they get their orders from. You want to make a difference? Teach men how to game. Complaining about how women behave to a group of guys who are well aware of their behavior won’t do anything but confirm the insecurities of the silent lurkers reading the threads here, and they’ll end up in the mgtow camp whining and crying about matriarchy.
            Your heart is in the right place, but you’re knocking friendlies out of the air. Focus and aim.

          • Scray says:

            Is this serious?

            The golden rule for life — and as a man — is to separate verbal bullshit from the real world. I don’t even listen to women — OR MEN — anymore. Watch what they do.

            A lot of girls will talk shit about women being this, feminist that — but they will never actually act that way. Same thing with men, too. Men talk a lot of shit about women evil, women stupid….but watch how they fucking act lol.

            I don’t even understand how you guys can have the bad attitudes you have any more.

          • corvinus says:

            Why the negativity? Sure, things are bad, but saying “all women hate men” is completely ridiculous. They don’t. Or, the ones we want don’t. A woman’s SMV is inversely proportional to how much she hates men, barring unusual psychological problems — and even there, low-SMV women have more and worse psycho problems anyway. And I doubt many of the girls I meet even know what HuffPo is.

            You’re even worse than Patrice. At least he wants to learn. Heck, I find I’m even agreeing with Metro Wanker on this one.

          • Jesus, Grim Grinch, even Hatriarch can’t quite stomach you. Subway Masturbator Personality Disorder of the Month award for you!.

          • Patriarch says:

            Fap fap fap…
            Splatriarch…running down your chin.

    • Dr Caveman says:

      Grim, you sound more like a fruit fly from this experiment:

      ‘Sexual frustration impairs the health of fruit flies and causes premature death, according to new research. Scientists found that male flies who were stimulated to mate but prevented from doing so, had their lives cut short by up to 40%.Those allowed to copulate not only lived longer but suffered less stress’

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-25120980

  18. walawala says:

    I do this now. I will send a girl a photo instead of a reply, could be a cocktail, or a sunset or something like this.

  19. goofer says:

    this dude must be honored before a football game or throw the first pitch or something at that level.

  20. for facin me ill break ya teeth n wind up getting a probation breach /
    bitch you could die over a taste of beef , call me maple leaf /
    your grimey, your ryhmes as scummy as your outfit /
    why dont you put a hundred on my cock and put your money where your mouth is (faggot)

  21. Wilshire says:

    guess Reservoir hasn’t read the Bacchae. it’s pretty clear dionysus’ll buttfuck you–your crazed mother will tear you limb from limb– and society cannot survive if there is no place for revelry and the irrational.

    a smidge of acid and some euripides outta fix you right up

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion