Feed on
Posts
Comments

And, to a lesser extent, men more like women, at least in an outpost of the West.

Facial structure of men and women has become more similar over time. […]

Researchers found that craniofacial differences between contemporary men and women are less pronounced than they were in the 16th century. The researchers also found that, while craniofacial features for both sexes in Spain have changed over time, the changes have been particularly significant in females. For example, the facial structure of modern Spanish females is much larger than the structure of 16th century females. This difference may stem from improved nutrition or other environmental factors.

The manjaw is not a figment of the imaginations of CH scene observers. Western women really are looking less feminine and, likely, becoming more psychologically man-like because personality traits and physiology correlate.

So this is the world the West is hurtling toward: A steaming mass of lantern-jawed, hairy forearmed, gratingly obnoxious feminist witches. A world of Amanda Marcottes. What could be a worse sexually unimorph combo than the entitlement and irrationality of women hitched to the aggro posturing and striver pretensions of men?

The study doesn’t say how much of the masculinization of women is genetic versus environmental, but the distinction is academic, since once a woman has taken on male traits it’s nigh impossible to re-feminize her within the window of her fifteen year peak sexual marketability.

Whether it’s more calories, better (or worse) nutrition, or sexual selection favoring self-sufficient careerist shrikes, the path to divinely inspired and exquisitely vulnerable female beauty appears to have hit a thicket of brambles. And who are the biggest losers in this manjawed milieu? Beta provider males. What do they bring to the marketplace of ids that a go-getter bitch with her own pursestrings doesn’t already have? A cuckold victim promissory note?

140 Responses to “Study: Women Really Are Becoming More Like Men”

  1. lzozozlozlzozozolzolz

    YAH HERATITSSTE!

    da womenz are getting so masucline masicluinezed dat this TEXT exchange happened last night!!!

    GBFM: lostsa cockas 4u
    STEPHANIE: losstas cockas 4u 2
    GBFM: gay
    STEPHANIE: i don’t wnat to get you pregnant lzozzlzzzl

    zlzolzozlolozolzolzozolzo

  2. earl says:

    “What do they bring to the marketplace of ids that a go-getter bitch with her own pursestrings doesn’t already have?”

    A penis.

  3. JayMan says:

    A couple of things:
    1. Sampling bias. How do we know these remains are representative of either population?
    2. This is Iberia. This may have little to nothing to do with the N. European populations you’re familiar with.
    3. This is one snapshot in time (16th cent.) vs another snapshot in time (20th cent.). This is not enough information to establish a trend.
    4. Even if a trend existed, the cause is not clear. It’s an even bigger leap to assume this translate this to personality changes.
    5. For those reasons, it’s one hell of a leap to assume that this has any bearing on changes in appearance or personality that you may have observe in your lifetime.

    Dang, good thing you guys have me around … ;)

    • The whole thing is a bit Lamarckian for me.

      The best evidence seems to be pointing in the direction of what happens with fetal testosterone in the womb…although nobody’s really sure to what extent that’s genetic or environmental.

      • Anonymous says:

        Aren’t you a masculine female, RD? Not trying to be insulting, would be genuinely interested in hearing about your experiences.

        • RappaccinisDaughter says:

          Yes, I’m a low-digit-ratio woman, and no, I’m not insulted. What do you want to know?

          • burke says:

            what the hell, which is it? i had imagined you with some real baby-making hips yesterday.

          • RappaccinisDaughter says:

            The low-digit-ratio appearance presents along a spectrum. Some women with it are full-on diesel; some of us look very normal. Some of us are even sort of pretty. (Ann Coulter is a classic LDR, for example.)

            Physically, I present as quite feminine. You really have to know what you’re looking for to pick up on me…as in, you have to actually look at my hands and compare the length of my ring fingers to my index fingers. To note that the corners of my jaw come in at a 90-degree angle.

            Where it shows the most is in my personality. Example: I do indeed have “baby-making” hips, but no babies will ever pass through them…I had myself sterilized a couple of years ago.

          • David says:

            ” no babies will ever pass through them…I had myself sterilized a couple of years ago.”

            Certainly it’s your body and your choice. I felt sad for a moment when I read this. You’re a sincere person and would be a fine mother. I don’t understand doing that. But there’s a lot I don’t understand.

          • RappaccinisDaughter says:

            Ha ha, I get the “but you’re so good with kids, you’d be such a great mom!” thing all the time.

            It’s true; I am good with kids. Thing is, I’m good with them for the same reason that gay guys and straight men with a true abundance mentality* are good with women: I am aloof to them. I’m not impressed with them. I don’t see a baby and think “OMG BABY BABY BABY MY OVARIES ARE THROBBING” or whatever it is that most women seem to experience around kids. It’s not that I dislike them—I just don’t have any emotional investment in getting them to like me.

            *And this is where we can bring this all back around to Game!

          • Anonymous says:

            Too much testosterone to be able to have a maternal instinct. I don’t think it’s funny at all, I think it’s sad that so many modern women have their brains wired all incorrectly like that.

          • RappaccinisDaughter says:

            Are you the same anonymous who asked about my experiences above, or a different anonymous?

          • Anonymous says:

            I’m the same person. What other things do you notice that make you different from more feminine women more psychologically? Was your mother also masculinized?

          • Anonymous says:

            Wow that sentence was a monstrosity.

          • RappaccinisDaughter says:

            Well, I just typed a long comment and WordPress ate it.

          • kfg says:

            That’s why God invented copy to clipboard.

      • Lara says:

        I never heard about it, until I read about women who have a low digit ratio on Steve Sailer’s site. It’s interesting to me. I wish it would get studied more.

      • Revo Luzione says:

        Lamarckianism doesn’t carry the stigma that it once did. Epigenetics is the the new Lamarckianism, since they’re basically stating the same thing. Epigenetics has been well-demonstrated on both individual and population levels, with studies showing that lifestyle choices will affect at least several future generations of gene expression.

  4. Lara says:

    I don’t associate Spain with feminism. They should study American women to make that connection.

  5. Vi Nay says:

    Guess it can go both ways too judging by the below link: I feel for the younger good looking guys out there because they have been brought up in the meterosexual culture, and they believe women find this attractive and appealing. A minority of females do, but the vast majority of them will only cut men of this kind slack if they are famous or of extreme high status (ala David Beckham – the original meterosexual man). So these younger guys spend more time worrying what their pretty features look like than concentrating on actual worthwhile traits that will attract women such as attitude, confidence, body posture, status and “don’t give a crap” demeanour.

    http://www.listal.com/list/men-with-feminine-faces

  6. Sidewinder says:

    This trend is undeniable. I am firmly on the traditional side, against this trend. I like sexual dimorphism. I like feminine women. But this really makes me question whether we are on the wrong side of history. Maybe we’re the dinosaurs? Perhaps evolution favors this androgyny.

    Us traditionalists argue that this is actually unnatural, is resulting in lower birthrates, and that the 3rd world hordes still governed by traditional male/female roles will overtake us. But what if that premise is incorrect? While we (androgenized Western people) are severely outnumbered, is there any question that if push came to shove we could kill every single 3rd world person on the planet?

    Those of us waiting for our sick society to collapse may be waiting on a ship that will never come.

  7. Sidewinder says:

    I think the lower betas are doing great. Its the upper betas lesser alphas who are getting the short end of the stick. Every single careerist shrike I know has a Herb at home.

    • Heydrich says:

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! The hissy fits are entertaining beyond belief.

      This chick may be a little dago-y, but man she gets it.

      • corvinus says:

        This whole thing is just too horrifying to contemplate. I swear, if I go over to someone’s house and I see this book on their bookshelf, I’m going to have to leave. –MadPiglet

        Yeah, like I’d want to get involved with a broad who goes by the handle “Mad Piglet”…

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I’m sure most of the criticism is from women who are about 40 pounds overweight, tattoos, piercings, and unflattering hairdos. They’re the female equivalent of greasy, overweight bubbas demanding tens rim them to redeem themselves as women..

    • FTM says:

      You can hear feminists’ shrill replies, “OMG, someone save her! He doesn’t cook, clean up after her and worship her! Poor girl!” (feminist goes home to empty household or emasculated boyfriend that she continues to blame her life problems on.

      • Flavia says:

        I may be able to lend some insight as I have seen the show. He DOES worship her. He’s extremely kind and giving to her, and is constantly showing her affection. I find it to be a product of the fact that she is a good mother, housewife, and maintains herself as beautiful and thin as she can.

        What feminists don’t understand is that you must be of value in order to deserve praise….you are not intrinsically valuable…that’s the problem: women are given the message that existing is enough. It is not.

        • Simon Corso says:

          Clearly. but what happens when you try to pass that message to the sisterhood ?

          • Flavia says:

            I have no idea. I don’t really encounter a lot of those women…even my party friends hate feminists. It is totally a northern USA thing….down where I live you’d be harder pressed to find a nice guy than you would a nice girl.

    • Good link man, the husband ‘barely views her as human’

      Ha, did you notice the hypocritical links on the side, about man-child and sesame street being thrilling?
      http://eruditeknight.wordpress.com/2013/09/26/wow-jezebel-feminist-hypocrisy/

    • Flavia says:

      The first comment: “”if a man comes home and there’s no dinner on the table, and his wife is on the phone, watching TV, or on the computer ignoring him, he won’t feel respected.”

      Well, he needs to learn to fucking cook.”

      So…

      If a woman and her children are being evicted from their house due to non payment, and the bills are piling up and there’s no food in the fridge because the husband is too busy playing video games to get a job….

      Well she needs to learn to fucking work.

      ARGH! FUCK YOU FEMINISTS!! We had it so good!!!!! Fucking idiots!!!!! Do you know what I did today? i played with my baby and did dishes, dude. That’s it. Gonna vaccuum a bit, and scrub some toilets….Dinner will take an hour. That’s it. You wanna give up playing with your babies to go bust your ass 8 hours a day, so you don’t have to vaccum for like 20 minutes and fry up some chicken? All in the name of equality? Because filing papers 8 hours a day is so much better than playing with a baby and scrubbing a toilet (takes like 5 minutes). How does your fighting for my right to be a corporate slave help my self worth? How does it improve my life? It’s so backwards it’s nauseating.

      • “You wanna give up playing with your babies to go bust your ass 8 hours a day, so you don’t have to vaccum for like 20 minutes and fry up some chicken?”

        Yup.

        But that’s just me. If that’s what you want to do, and you and your husband have found a way to make it work, rock on. That’s what feminism originally was supposed to be about, and what it *should* still be…choices.

        The problem is that the feminist movement attained all of its reasonable goals (voting, owning property, etc.) relatively early on. But once those goals were met, rather than disband the movement or simply go into maintenance mode, feminism developed a bad case of mission creep.

        • You lost me at voting. Future generations are going to look back at women’s suffrage with a “WTF were they thinking?” attitude. Universal suffrage is a terrible idea.

          • RappaccinisDaughter says:

            Yes, I agree, universal suffrage is a terrible idea. People who don’t pay taxes shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

            On the other hand, anyone (male or female) who works and pays taxes and doesn’t get it all back in EITC should.

          • Sluggo says:

            RD, you do make sense sometimes. The complete package when combined with womanly hips and an athletic chest.

        • FuriousFerret says:

          “That’s what feminism originally was supposed to be about, and what it *should* still be…choices. ”

          I’m in a fantasy world while the rest of us live in reality. Unlimited choices simply does not happen. For there to be choices there has to be sacrifices. Women having all these choices that were rammed through with legislation has basically required most women to work to get by.

          All this reading on the CH and you still can’t grasp very easy logical concepts. With this being a shining example, I don’t think women should be able to vote.

      • garter snake says:

        Preach!

      • gunslingergregi says:

        The first comment: “”if a man comes home and there’s no dinner on the table, and his wife is on the phone, watching TV, or on the computer ignoring him, he won’t feel respected.”

        Well, he needs to learn to fucking cook.”

        So…

        If a woman and her children are being evicted from their house due to non payment, and the bills are piling up and there’s no food in the fridge because the husband is too busy playing video games to get a job….

        Well she needs to learn to fucking work.
        ””””””””””’

        yea exactly look who’s back
        the argument for equality is always one sided this chick i’m talkin too talks about its equal
        I say it can never be eual always gonna be lopsided one way or another
        ya can’t make shit equal
        I think I almost got her to understand
        like when I show up and 5 min later she sucking my dick that ain’t equal is it
        I will reach her lolzzzzzzzz

    • some dude says:

      I’m buying that book for my coffee table.

    • David says:

      Of course the hissy-fit is in error. Turning your wife around and ripping off her clothes is not rape by any legal definition I know. They wish it were rape. They wish any display of masculinity were rape. But the advice is carefully constructed so that the liability is limited to buying some new clothes. Well done Melissa!

      And the hissy-fit says that clear sexual roles is misogyny.

      Melissa has done great and elicited a review of her book that says more about the reviewer than anything else.

  8. O/T: I don’t know if this is “hamster of the year” or “psycho bitch of the year,” but enjoy!

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/this-is-one-of-the-most-brutal-responses-to-a-break-up-text

    • Lara says:

      I would get angry if a man spoke to me in that condescending way. I’d rather have him treat me so badly, that eventually my pride kicks in, and I break things off with him. A real man, knows how to get free of a woman, without creating too many hard feelings.

      • RappaccinisDaughter says:

        I don’t see condescension; I see politeness. Yes, he’s probably overdoing it a bit for somebody he’s only been on one date with, but there’s nothing there to justify her going nuclear on him the way she did. He didn’t shoot her dog or steal her stereo, he said “thanks but no thanks.”

        • corvinus says:

          My guess is that she’s basically the female version of a niceguy. She was offended because he didn’t want to date her, even though she was being oh so nice to him (just being friendly, of course), and therefore told him off.

      • Where exactly was the ‘condescending’? You are a typical feminist if you sympathize with the girl in this case. The guy gave a normal goodbye and she lost her shit defending her ego.

      • Simon Corso says:

        ” A real man, knows how to get free of a woman, without creating too many hard feelings.”

        You mean just not responding to texts/phonecalls is bad ?

        I’m keen to hear your advice on this, I’ve got some dumpings to do and I want to let them down easy .

    • Lara says:

      The most alphas guys don’t officially break up with you. You never had them tied down to begin with.

      • Revo Luzione says:

        ^this. This is how you get the MLTR, the soft harem, and make them last. Attrition is unavoidable, but if you keep your pipeline flowing, it’s all good.

      • David says:

        So you’re criticizing the guy for being informative and honest? Yes I know it turns off the juices, which may be why we saw such a flood of bullshit from her. He suddenly became beta to her, and the shit started. (my interpretation anyway.)

        But he was willing to go thru it, for the sake of honesty. He can feel good that he did nothing wrong to this girl and, indeed, she can move on.

        • David says:

          The more I think about it, the more I think I am right. What did she react to the worst? The nice compliment at the end, calling her a cool girl.

          Maybe there’s never a reason to compliment a girl. It’s always a risk. He complimented her and she went after him with claws out in return.

        • Lara says:

          His text just seemed a little self important, that’s all. He’s probably a nice guy.

    • Normally I think it’s wrong to posts pictures of exes online, but when this bitch has one of her exes send her intimate pictures to her boss, I will laugh. The “send things to peoples bosses to get them fired” is going to end with someone getting killed with a whole lot of articles about victim blaming shortly following.

    • corvinus says:

      The same sort of thing happened to me a couple of weeks ago.

    • Glengarry says:

      The only possible reply to that tl;dr text would be “stay away from my bunny”.

    • some dude says:

      She lives in DC, ugh. She is only 26 which, sorry ladies, is a girl. She is infantilizing herself by acting like a big baby. She gave him her CV (2 books and a condo) like she was a guy. And then is proud of herself at probably getting him in trouble at work.

      The dude probably saw her crazy eyes and was doing damage control by dumping her. Hopefully his boss is a man and understands.

    • Jay in DC says:

      He probably saw some trappings of “crazy” in the short time they spent together. And in typical SWPL DC chick fashion he is soooooo paralyzed by an alpha dude who, politely, tells her to keep walking. And again in typical DC chick fashion we get the laundry list of accomplishments because their entire soul is intricately tied to career and resume. It is why career negs are absolute olgd nuggets in this city.

    • Heydrich says:

      Wow. Butt fugly AND entitled. Two great tastes that taste great together- it’s like a typical DC candy bar.

      I hope he used a condom on her condo.

      • sfer says:

        She admits that she is a hypomanic in one of her books.

      • OralCummings says:

        Frankly I thought the bitch was hot. Slutty kind of. If u check her book on Amazon you will notice her chin tho. This is a girl who is up for a threesome IMHFO.

  9. Estrogen in the water…been saying this shit for years.

    • Revo Luzione says:

      Not just in the water–in plastics, in paint fumes, in skin care products. It’s fuggin’ everywhere.

    • earl says:

      Women need to quit pissing birth control hormones into the water supply.

      Contraceptives have ruined both sexes.

      • It has had the added bonus that teenagers have the potential to look about early 20s, and the added penalty of 20 year old girls looking like they are 30+

    • Sad Clown says:

      Why would more estrogen exposure make women more masculine? Are we in bizarro world?

      • meatbowling says:

        Excess testosterone can turn into estrogen, but I’m quite sure it doesn’t work the other way.

      • corvinus says:

        Any fiddling with the hormonal balance will screw up how it would be naturally and optimally, and thereby pull either sex toward a neutral androgynous state.

        • David says:

          Estrogen is what causes the growth plates on bones to fuse and growth to stop. So fiddling a bit to prevent testosterone turning to estrogen in adolescence could have a beneficial effect of becoming taller than you were “supposed” to be.

      • burke says:

        i know _nothing_ about it but maybe it could have more to do with imbalance than with the absolute value of estrogen. i have a feeling there’s a natural balance and anything differentiating from that leads to less feminine differences.

        if estrogen just made them more and more feminine i’d be spiking every drink in town and looking at boobs all day.

      • Revo Luzione says:

        More xeno-estrogen (from the outside) means the body has to use comparatively less resources to make its own estrogen, leaving more raw materials to make more testosterone. In other words, less competition for resources benefits testosterone.

        Also, with all the sugar in teh modern diet, a lot of chicks have ovarian cysts that produce a lot of hormones including testosterone and cortisol. When you see a woman who has a hairy enough upper lip to keep Bic stock prices rising, chances are, she’s got ovarian cysts caused by excess sugar consumption. And, worse, there are a LOT more chicks that have this disorder than we know about, ’cause most of them get their mustaches waxed or lasered off. Some chicks will even shave the upper lip, but that leaves stubble. Most SWPL chicks with this disorder simply wax it.

        Next time you bang a hair stylist or other female who works in a salon or spa, ask her how many chicks get their upper lip done when they go in to get the Brazilian or other spa services. It’s a LOT.

        • David says:

          Does the body make estrogen directly? I know that it makes testosterone directly, and that can be converted to estrogen, but that pathway invalidates your hypothesis. Is there a direct pathway of making estrogen that does not involve making testosterone first?

          • Revo Luzione says:

            In women, yes, they have their own direct pathway, and it’s the main pathway. For men, the jury is out, but either way, if men can make estrogen directly, it’s a tiny amount, most is aromatized from estrogen, primarily in fatty tissue.

    • Jay in DC says:

      She has juuuust the right amount of cream in that coffee… would smash. Body is a 10 but those pesky Negro genes are still too much in that face.

  10. KillerQ says:

    The changes have more to do with the availability of food. Just look at the difference in height between cultures that have vs. those that have not.

    • The Burninator says:

      That was the second thought I was going to post as well. Look at doorways built in the 1600′s and you’d come away, correctly, thinking that people averaged 5’2″ or so (just hazarding a guess, but they were short little buggers).

  11. Subarctic Hillbilly says:

    I’ll go along with environmental estrogen causing epigenetic expressions. Anything else does smack of Lamarckian “inheritability of acquired characteristics.” And you bast’ids know how many millions Lysenko killed during the 1920s with that particular bullshit. Ideas have consequences. Bad ideas have tragic consequences.

  12. “This difference may stem from improved nutrition ”

    You know, that may be the deciding factor and unrelated to feminism or something devious. I’d be very interested to see comparisons between Roman women from the year 30 B.C. and modern women, where Rome was at the time highly affluent, cosmopolitan and well fed. Point being, if it’s nutrition related, then they should be very similar in structure to each other. If ancient Roman women however were just like 16th century women, then something else would likely be the culprit.

    • pulsotic says:

      Was monsanto and Dow around then? Genetically modified and processed foods and herbicides and fluoride being ingested daily have disastrous effects on everything in our bodies. It would be interesting to compare to Romans of 30BC but you’d have to control for toxins. I don’t know anyone who hasn’t eaten some amount of MSG.

      • Please! This is not Oprah, Dr Phil or even some quack throwing around medical advice on youtube. This is not some feminist forum for abusing the ‘patriarchy’ and its annoying insistence on actually using rational scientific methodology to make decisions.

        CH’s blog is categorized by his use of citation and scientific evidence in order to back up his arguments. So if you are going to make comments about Monsanto or Dow Chemicals then lets back them up with facts.

        Here is the view of one of the leading medical bodies in the U.S. on MSG

        http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/monosodium-glutamate/AN01251

        I trust the FDA. I do not trust the media and they way they are abusing science.

    • Carlos Danger says:

      Roman men averaged between 5’4″ and 5’6″ and Germans were about 3-5″ taller on average. I would make an educated guess, the average Roman hottie was about 5″ and 90 lbs, not unlike petite and young Vietnamese women. I bet that was some tight pussy.

  13. + - says:

    OT – A girl with streaked hair signals sexual availability right?

    So if an ex whos never streaked her hair in 24 years suddenly streaks her hair and sends you a lot of pics out of the blue, does that mean you get a shot at revenge sex?

    • corvinus says:

      Why would you want to bang a 40 y.o. woman?

      • Not everybody here is 18 years old and thinks people over 30 are “icky”. There are plenty of very attractive 35+ year old women. Shoot for the youngest you can get, clearly, but it’s not as if you’d turn down a Barbara Eden when she was 40 (nor a Jennifer Aniston at the same age).

        • earl says:

          As long as I can photoshop them beforehand…sure 35-40 is okay.

        • Sidewinder says:

          I agree. I sometimes have an appetite for the 35+ in particular. The problem is the math. You only have about 10 years until menopause with a beautiful 35 year old. You get twice the ass with a decent 25 year old over time.

        • The Burninator says:

          No disagreement Sidewinder. I just find it odd that somehow anybody over 18-24 is undesirable for a bang. I’ve read all the articles, here and on other sites, and I get the logic from a biomechanics perspective, but that doesn’t stop Jennifer Aniston from being hotter than a tin roof in summer even at 44. I’d bang her in a New York minute and let her buy me nice cars.

          • corvinus says:

            You know… Not All Aging Prunes Are Like That.

          • The Burninator says:

            Correct. But that doesn’t mean all are undesirable either. Screaming “Ewww, over 35 is icky!” is kind of funny once you see somebody do it after you’ve gotten past your early/mid 20′s. No biggie though, do as you will.

          • corvinus says:

            Ew. Old people sex.

          • Travis says:

            I agree. Because we all know that Jennifer Aniston is a fairly accurate representation of the average 44 year old woman.

          • The Burninator says:

            What’s fun is that some day, you’re going to get older. And you won’t realize it until it’s far too late to do anything about it. ;)

            Not that I actually care, I go out with 20 somethings, I just like to keep perspective.

          • The Burninator says:

            @Travis

            Clearly she isn’t. But then, I don’t see you calling out Corvis for his blanket coverage of 40+ women either, which is exactly the same kind of thing presented differently. When it comes to human being, the words “all” and “none” rarely apply (excepting things like “all living people breath”). Which was my point.

          • corvinus says:

            Burn, seriously… every SWPLtard and shitlib out there constantly harps on how you can’t generalize. Of course I know there are exceptions. You’re not saying anything I haven’t heard a million times.

          • The Burninator says:

            Yet, you generalized without allowing for exceptions.

            No biggie at this point, no minds will be changed, and there’s no need to prolong this discussion and detract from the rest of the thread.

            Slainte

  14. Ronin says:

    Sift through any page of user-submitted Chivette photos over at thechive.com and you will see a lot of Man-Chins, too.

    Wide at the point, longer distance from the lower-lip than they should be. Sometimes even cleft, instead of convex. Sad.

    • Jay in DC says:

      Did a little “research” there seems to be a mixed bag. There are SOME manjaws but they are interspersed with some hotties that need a serious hulk smash too…

  15. goodspeed says:

    Id like to see how different xenoestrogens affect humans:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenoestrogen

  16. Johnycomelately says:

    What’s the issue, Western women will die off and the Eastern women will predominate.

  17. LD says:

    amanda marcotte has the same jawline as actor james cromwell.

  18. Stuki says:

    Going out on limb here, but back when a woman’s brood was limited by number of live births before she died in childbirth, feminine (as in making her a better breeding mare) traits would be selected for. Take away that pressure, and it doesn’t take much femininity to achieve above average fertility.

    • Sad Clown says:

      Errr. Lots of factors limited brood size. And women who die during childbirth are at an evolutionary disadvantage – her genes don’t survive if no one’s there to raise her children.

  19. Scray says:

    Here’s a good Q for ya’ll:

    So….how do you kno if things a girl says, such as ‘I’ve never done X, felt X, etc. before’ are true?

    Clearly some girls must lie about this. But at the same time, there’s a first time for everything.

    I ask b/c my behavior is becoming increasingly assholish and narcissistic — like, the more I get these girls to do for me, the more I want them to do….just cause — but, it’s seeming to work on every level. Some of the sex has just been insane…..to the point where I can’t even look at these people the same way lol how can you? It’s like living another life.

    So anyway, there’s been a surge of comments like those recently and I was wondering ‘well how the fuck do I kno if these bishes are telling the truff?’

    • pulsotic says:

      Since I’ll never know, I just assume they’re lying and let them think I think they’re innocent. More often women are way dirtier than you think. It’s just now you get to be the one they’re nasty with.

    • gunslingergregi says:

      yea man uhh don’t go to far have some limit or you will be getting pegged one day he he he
      and yea ya don’t know
      but i’m pretty sure my bitches haven’t sucked toes before but hey I still don’t know
      my standard if the bitch is telling the truth or not on felt x Is tat my name on your neck though he he he
      my new goal is see how many I can get tat tat tatted up

      • gunslingergregi says:

        or prob good to enjoy as much innocent type stuff as you can before moving on to insane shit but yea whatevs lol

    • Hook or Crook says:

      “Truth” is absolutely situational and liquid for women; they can’t ‘lie’ because they are always expressing immediate desires/emotions without thought for context or precedence.

      Bro version: Of course they’re lying; what’s important is that they’re lying for *you*.

      • Scray says:

        Ok, but this creates a weird pussy paradox does it not?

        Can a woman have a first of nothing, then? Just saying. It’s kind of interesting.

        • gunslingergregi says:

          when they feed me at table and shit I know it is prob there first time
          innocent yet first timy lol
          when they jump off the top my truck and I catch em prob their first time
          when they see you and run and jump into your arms and you never see bitches do that not in movies it might be their first time
          if you tell the bitch to leave and she stops breathin it might be the first time he he he

    • I get what you mean. On one hand, when you do something wild with a girl, it’s like “Damn, that was great!!!”

      On the other.

      It’s like “Wait, how the fuck did you know how to do that. Where did you learn?”

      It’s better to let sleeping dogs lie lol

  20. My dad used to say ‘because women are acting more like men they will start looking like them’. I always thought it was odd logic, but, who the fuck knows, he may be right.

  21. byronicmate says:

    Lately, I’ve been thinking about meta-game. Chase Amante wrote an article about in on his site and I remember once when a girl used it on me via text in high school. *what follows is not exact, but close enough*

    Me: Careful, you’d better keep it up or my favor might wander

    Her: Haha no, I don’t think you understand human nature. it’s the man’s job to perform for the woman. Then we get to choose.So you’re the one who needs to do good ;)

    I didn’t respond after that. At that point the only person I knew of was Doc Love. Now, I’m thinking if a girl flakes/shit-tests/in general employs feminine wiles a good response might be along the immortal words of Riley from the Boondocks:

    Me: “game recognizes game, I’m guessing u read cosmo?”

    * if it’s an uncalibrated or just blatant call out like the text she sent me*

    Or in a more standard generic text/in person case.

    Her: Haha, I can’t make it (2 hours before date) because blablabla *long meaningless explanation*

    Me: A “Rules” girl I see. ( f.y.i. there’s a book with hot/cold advice for women called “the rules”)

    Another story:

    Once, after she didn’t respond to my text for a few hours, I took 3. She replied

    Her: Lol are u trying to punish me for not texting you back? I was driving blablabla

    As you can see, I was punching above my weight. Actually, to this day I have no idea how I’d respond to that appropriately.

    Thoughts?

  22. Bob Wallace says:

    I’m going to invest all my money in Sybians, because the MJM (Man-Jawed Monstrosities) sure aren’t going to get any men. I’ll be rich! Yahoo!

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion