What’s more degrading:
a. paying a whore because you have no other way to get laid
b. sleeping with this for free:
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
A Valentine’s Day Thought Experiment
Feb 14th, 2012 by Heartiste
60 Responses to “A Valentine’s Day Thought Experiment”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
I would vote for him before Vance or whatever anti-white golem the Dems nominate. Not saying Hunter Biden will be Hitler Biden, but the sheer lunacy of a President Crackpipe could widen the fissures in Weimarica, and pave the way for a third (reich) party.
-
If Hitler (pbuh) came back to Germany today, he would weep bitter tears first, and then he would reconstitute the Third Reich, but instead of conquering Globobolshevism, he'd direct the full might of the German Wotanic spirit against the traitors within Germany.
-
It's a pathology at this point. It should be an affliction with a DSM-V designation.
-
Thais are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Vietnamese are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Somalis are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Haitians are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Indians are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Hondurans are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.Then one day, you'll look out across your town square, and blond-haired children will be 1% of your local community.
And that will be a big deal.
-
Better idea: Import the recipes, leave the Thais home.
-
"Bonnie Pierce had already escaped her burning Minnesota home when she realized her toddler was still trapped inside. She turned around and RAN BACK INTO THE FIRE for her little girl.
When firefighters reached them, Bonnie was unconscious with her body wrapped around Grace, shielding her daughter from the flames and smoke."
Her daughter survived.
This is how a healthy society should revere motherhood. It recognizes true maternal heroism and carries along the lesson to each generation, as part of its sustaining mythos, that mothers will sacrifice everything for their children.
An evil society gathers its flock along roadsides, to toss roses and weepy tributes to a mother accused of murdering her three children.
-
There is a kernel of truth in this meme, which is why it resonates. But as with all memes, full truth often is not so easily encapsulated.
Women have some moral and actionable agency. They make personal decisions based on innate desires, just like men do, except framed by their female nature.
Women's poor life decisions and political insanities are not entirely the fault of jewish agitprop. Their liberation, a predictable consequence of late stage empire trajectories, removes patriarchal guardrails that had channeled female hypergamy away from reckless manifestations. "Feminism" becomes the easy choice for modren men whose own manly virtues have fled them.
But, women by nature are also consensus seekers, and like a dog without a pack leader, feel unmoored and anxious when there is no social consensus for them to follow and mimic. Women become "bitey" under those conditions, and unloveable. This reality of female nature makes it possible for malignant outsiders, like the jews, to manipulate female consensus-seeking by substituting the organic consensus of White male society with the alien consensus of subversive jewish values.
Once the new consensus is established in the void of the surrendered traditional consensus, women flock (heh) to it, even if it is harmful to them over the long run.
What I am getting at here is that the correct lens through which to analyze the behavior of modren White women is one that recognizes their agency and the share of blame they must incur for their bad choices and even worse politics, while also recognizing the imposition of a foreign virus that has hijacked the emotional needs of our women to direct its expression to foul ends.
The inevitable decay of empire virtues coupled with the inevitable subversion of jewish influence is a force multiplier of White female lunacy and race treason.
In practical terms, what this means is that White men face a choice: place all blame on their women, no blame on their women, or a mix of blame and leniency.
The All Blame option leaves jewish agitprop in place, an intolerable compromise.
The No Blame option requires the complete disenfranchisement of women from politics and much of the consensus-shaping culture. Effectively, women will be treated like children with limited rights and limited accountabilty.
The Blame and Leniency option removes jewish agitprop while simultaneously shaming women away from self-destructive politics, race betrayal, and personal behaviors that cheapen their value to White men.
This is why I have maintained all along that the WQ and the JQ are at once inseparable yet unique enough in their attributes to come under separate scrutiny.
White knightoids for some low-T reason are butthurt about this fundamental truth.
-
Protestantism is the child of Hajnalism. When Whites of Northwest Europe became more individualistic and "bootstrappy", it inevitably followed that those same Whites would chafe at a universalizing religious authority and strike out on their own.
It's somewhat comical to consider the irony of the Catholic Church's ban on cousin marriage, which set in motion the genetic selection for more individualistic Whites, was the very seed which grew into the dominant schism that fractured the Church.
-
When White racial rightists were a nonthreatening circus sideshow, establishment conservatives of the jewniparty felt comfortable winking and nodding at their grievances.
Now that White racial rightists are drawing immense interest and gathering followers by the millions and becoming a major threat to the jewniparty, establishment conservatives have frantically pivoted to dowsing the fire of White rage in the hope of quashing the only real solution to the problems that these cuckservatives pretended to care about.
-
Most people don’t know that Frank Sinatra has an arrest record and a mugshot to match. The reason for his arrest may be even more surprising. The official charge? Seduction.
This seemingly archaic charge was generally applied when a man convinced an unmarried woman of good repute to engage in an inappropriate encounter with him. There was generally a promise of marriage that was never actually forthcoming, thereby ruining her reputation.
In 1938, a 23-year-old Sinatra found himself in just such a situation, and he was officially arrested and booked for Seduction. The charge was eventually dropped when it was discovered that the supposedly single woman was in fact married. Later that year, armed with this new information, the original charge was revised slightly, and Sinatra was again arrested, this time for Adultery.
crimemuseum.org/crime-library/celebrity-mugsh
It's interesting that at a time when the patriarchy that feminists decry ruled America, a man could be arrested for "Seduction" or Adultery.
Now, in the ashes of the patriarchy and in the full flower of the gynarchy with its contraception and abortion handmaidens, a man can pump and dump his way through a small army of feminists with nary a disruption to his hedonistic lifestyle.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
A. Not because of the whore bit but because you have no other way…
A juicy Double Whopper….that’s been sitting in a dumpster for a few days…hmmm…should I just pick the maggots off?
which has the nicer snatch?
There’s no room for dignity in this shootout.
Go with a) and call it a transaction. At least the capitalist tint makes it a little less odious.
Dude don’t put things that scary in an RSS feed. Seriously, I was eating when I saw that.
i would do the whore.
i got issues.
b is beyond degrading, it’s physiologically impossible for most.
a may be degrading to some degree, but if you’re cruising across the nevada desert solo there are worse ways to stop and catch a shower.
Don’t forget the most SOUL-CRUSHING choice of all, choice (C):
Paying for sex on a daily basis (or monthly via check) but NOT getting sex, i.e., having a wife or ex-wife.
I would gladly take option a, failing that …shoot myself
The only other thing more degrading than those two options is paying for a whore that looks like that
whores are fine.
whores are the only honest women. They tell you the price up front.
I got some hot footage for those who’d pick choice b):
Don’t forget the kleenex, dawg.
So what’s the etiquette, do I take some flowers to the whorehouse today or not?
you pay for (a) with money.
you pay for (b) with your soul.
yeah, but (a) pays with her soul … although she gets money for this.
[heartiste: most sex workers enter the field voluntarily. the narrative to the contrary is simply total bullshit.]
i think it’s better to sleep with (b) because she has nice hair
[i’d hate to see what your definition of bad hair looks like.]
and beautiful eyes
[if there was any doubt that you are not a persistent troll, this comment should dispel it.]
and by loving her you can inspire her to lose weight and stop smoking.
[her problems are far more numerous than fatness and smoking. she needs a DNA enhancement.]
sleeping with a prostitute just causes further damage to her soul.
[if it’s so soul damaging, why do most whores go into it on their own accord and stay with it for years?]
Maya, look at b. Really look at her. Take off your new agey “I’m okay you’re okay” blinders for a minute.
I’d say that woman’s soul is damaged unless she is a Lesbian. If she is a Lesbian, she had that kind of edgy something I could see doing. If she is heterosexual, she utterly and completely hates herself.
The fact that she has pretty hair and pretty eyes, and though most women do have some confidence issues, we’re not all blind, means she has no remotely rational excuse for not caring for herself. It’s not like she’s extremely old or extremely ugly in raw terms, and would be empowered somehow by letting go of socially imposed grooming schedules or something. We’re not all perfect, but most of us care enough to not just let stuff go.
I’m not ashamed to say that even though as a woman I might hit that, if I was male I wouldn’t go near that with someone else’s dick. No way. Bring the hooker.
Nicole, please tell me the only way you would hit that is vigorously with a twelve inch strap on dildo that had been rolled with superglue and finely shreded glass laced with burning acid and poison which will kill her before she ever fucks again!!!
LOL.
At least with (a) you have a choice of which whore.
A. Not because of the whore bit but because you have no other way…
Even though I said b, yeah. Nothing wrong with the occasional whore as long as it’s not because you’re completely incapable of getting sex elsewhere.
cigstache is back! there’s a blast from the past. i think she was origially one of 10 photos featured in a “rank the chicks” post, maybe in late 2008 or early 2009, then became shorthand for fuglies in subsequent posts. thanks for bringing her back on valentines day, Chateau…
oneitis, maurice?
I choose masturbation.
A. I don’t believe I could ever pay for sex, not when there is plenty sex available in which no monetary transaction is required for the deed. If I was a wretched omega, though, I’d probably pay to have my product consumed.
B. My penis will shrivel in flaccid defiance at the sight of such a sorry specimen.
Agreed.
If it’s one of those high-class whores you see in the movies, then obviously a).
Otherwise, could I just let Bobby Brown punch me in the face?
This isn’t even close. At least the poor bastard who pays a pro because he can’t get any doable chick for free shows that he has absolute minimum standards…and at least one functional eye.
Most paid sex is not with pros.
Anyone who’s made a direct cash-for-sex transaction in their life is a pro in my book.
Clarification: I don’t mean to imply the term “pro” equates to them actually being skilled at their chosen trade.
Jeez, keep posting these pictures of late and the chateau will be where boners go to die.
I know tons of guys who are amazing with women who are quite into hookers and escorts. It has nothing to do with “choose one or the other”. Opie and Anthony talk about it all the time, and those guys are millionaires with 10′s.
Sadly I still feel some sort of dirtyness if I was to ever get a hooker. Probably a societal thing,
What a waste of blue eyes. God is cruel sometimes.
I chose mustache chick. You can’t prove someone fucked her, can you?
I mean I chose mustache chick as the worst of the options. Not as in I chose her.
Actually i’d rather do whitney housten than the creature. Bet the thing smells worse too… Iiii will always love yoooou
Choose the whore.
Keep it in the species.
You mean bipedal smelly nasty looking landwhales are not part of our species(modern present day human beings or homo sapiens sapiens). I’m shocked,(Not meant for you,Gorbachev, as I realize you are sane and intelligent like myself but for the insane or retarded people reading this—Hear my SARCASM!!!) shocked I tell you!!! What would our ruling elite with their supporting feminasties and White Knights/Manginas think?
they’re all whores, fellas.
Just because you didn’t put any cash in her hands doesn’t mean you haven’t done business.
Either way you pay. But money is easier to replace than time or dignity.
this is a guy bro. come on.
There’s no way in hell paying for a decent looking whore is more degrading than fucking the comic book guy from the simpsons
Come one, she isn’t that bad looking. I think she has a lovely chin. And it’s the inner beauty that matters.
A snorlax appeared…
Here’s Tiger Woods’ whore, as eyewash for the snorlax:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_it-hnLPVidA/S2vwIhp3f8I/AAAAAAAABpE/n0hs-yQFoYY/s400/phpThumb_generated_thumbnailjpg.jpg
Faced with that dylema, I take a) forever, especially if the girl I’d be paying was a Prepago paisa… In that case, the deal is clear: I have something you want and you have something I want, “trueque” and everyvbody got what they wanted without bullshitting.
However, I think the normal relationships are some sort of the a) case arrangement, where the man pays for sex, and the woman gets pleasure, commitment and the resources from the man. A very profitable contract for one part one very limiting for the other.
But the relationships that the game enables you to enter are relationships (especially the short term ones and the same night lays) where the only benefit for each part involved in the sexual contract is sex. A quid pro quo of sex.
I’ll take option A. You hoitty toitty mother fuckers have “paid” for sex one way or another. If you say you haven’t you probably have no pubes.
Let’s remember that CH wasn’t saying that all men who pay for sex, grinding or massages can’t get it otherwise. That’s not at all what he said but a number of commenters took it that way.
Reading comprehension guys…reading comprehension.
Meanwhile, many of the 11% who clicked on a) may have done so by mistake because the brain would have said “click on the one you’d prefer”. If those could take back their mistake, the collective answer would be mostly unanimous.
Also, it takes a fair amount of cluelessness not to realize that the girls many alphas fuck for free aren’t amateur whores with other men. Often the guys at the clubs get their free lays long after the virgin cashed in for cash at age 16.
The film “Debbie Does Dallas” wasn’t just fantasy. Teens are really like that.
Sorry: are whores for other men
That is very true. Even the ones with so-called alpha boyfriends still whore themselves out.
This is exactly what happened to me.
My line of thinking is very broad, but don’t you TECHNICALLY pay for ALL women? I mean how many girls are going to let you at the goodies without at least a noticeable investment of time, energy, or money? In most non “pay for play relationships”, don’t you usually end up having to sacrifice a healthy combination of all three?
Rather pay a whore that will be better looking than the trailer park mammoth.
Cigstache,
O Light of my Life,
O Fire of my loins
The irony is that sex for money generally costs a lot less than sex for free.
There are very thirsty men in this world and the woman in the photo has certainly been fucked. You have to wonder how much these poor fellows have spent on dates, gifts, children, divore settlements and, of course, the cost of wasted time and emotional turmoil from FUCKING THAT. Guarantee you that sad cases have dropped more on that (and other horrid women) on a fuck by fuck basis than they would if they have visited high class escorts during the same period.
As a guy who has been in an LTR for 16 years, I now understand the allure of hookers. Sometimes, you don’t want the mess and bother of affairs. Ask Elliot Spitzer or other dudes like him; they don’t have trouble attracting pussy, but they don’t want it interfering with their home lives.
From fringe to the Wall Street Journal in, what, three years? Four years? I dunno.
http://online.wsj.com/article/best_of_the_web_today.html
I honestly can’t believe so many of you picked option b. aside from the fact that fugly is clearly a man with a wig on (why would any fugly decide to fix up her hair but not the rest of the package) I’d rather pay for a decent looking whore than sleep with fugly. If you think about it, we all spend money on women one way or another and even then we spend time on them which could be spent on more ways to get money
Jordan Van Sloot, Batman Edition
for option b it just wouldn’t move.
As if more proof Obama’s beta was needed:
http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/02/obamas-valentines-day-advice-114421.html
B is more degrading by far
C’mon, ya judgmental bastids… all bodies are good bodies!