What’s more degrading:
a. paying a whore because you have no other way to get laid
b. sleeping with this for free:
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
A Valentine’s Day Thought Experiment
Feb 14th, 2012 by Heartiste
60 Responses to “A Valentine’s Day Thought Experiment”
Leave a Reply
Archives
Gab Feed
-
When a German says "I'm being deadly serious", he's being deadly serious.
-
"hypergamous disengagement"
The visitors scoured the brittle pamphlets, unearthed in a climate controlled trove that survived the centuries. They had questions. Did this extinct race of intelligent beings understand the nature of the threat facing them? If so, did they attempt to avert the catastrophe?
For the vistors, a fortuitous, sex-specific genetic mutation saved them from a similar fate. What they wanted to know was whether another species tried to adapt to the same fertility pressures in their own way?
The lead investigator tugged at a yellowed printout of an ancient text. He blew off the dust.
"Dread Game"
Further examination of the writing offered an answer. They knew. Or someone knew, and tried to send the message. A blueprint to save their species.
Further down the pile of papers, another entreaty.
"III. You shall make your mission, not your woman, your priority
Forget all those romantic cliches of the leading man proclaiming his undying love for the woman who completes him. Despite whatever protestations to the contrary, women do not want to be "The One" or the center of a man's existence. They in fact want to subordinate themselves to a wothy man's life purpose, to help him achieve that purpose with their feminine support, and to follow the path he lays out. You must respect a woman's integrity and not lie to her that she is "your everything". She is not your everything, and if she is, she will soon not be anymore."
It was, the visitor would later report to its superior, indirect proof of a cosmic law that directs the will of all advanced life in the universe. A sign, at last, of a Creator.
-
Inside women there are two wolves.
"I can make it better"
"I did that"
-
There are some fantastic archival photos of Reich era Germans smiling and laughing while jews in yellow stars skulk in the background.
The jew today says this is because the Germans were callous toward the suffering jews.
In reality, Germans were smiling because they were happy that their society was once again recognizable to them.
And, the jews were skulking for the same reason.
-
Civilization Cycle Theory and the JQ aren't mutually exclusive. A poster here makes an analogy to the serpent in the Garden of Eden. Just because Eve was weak and sinned, doesn't mean the serpent isn't culpable in the deceit.
Removing jewish influence from day to day operations of the empire would help heal the most gangrenous wounds, but the timetable of empire decline and decay of the people's virtues would remain roughly ten generations from the nation's inception.
Some cities within that declining order would survive and bristle with vitality. More relevant, there would be rural outposts that become seeding grounds for renewal, as happened many times before in European history. What we can say for certain is that separation from jewish corrupting influence will help us manage our own decline, and lead our people to the nation-creation rebirth that starts the cycle anew.
-
National Racialist or Racial Socialist.
Two ways to say National Socialist without saying it.
-
I recall reading on here that the biggest problem for jews is the globalization of Noticing.
In the golden olden days, when jews overstayed their welcome, they left (not always of their own accord) and ran the same schemes in a new town. Arrive, become hated, get kicked out, settle elsewhere, become hated, get kicked out. Repeat the process ad nauseam.
jewish group strategy succeeded with this blueprint because the accumulated benefits outweighed the costs of an occasional Local Noticing. But now that the Noticing has gone worldwide, jews can't just pack up, or progrom out, for a new White town to profit skim and culturally denude. All those escape destinations have been closed off by the rapid transmission of Gentile knowledge.
The result of this new reality is that jews feel a lot of internal pressure to stand their ground where they are, and force the natives to accommodate the imposition of jewishness. It has also turbocharged the jewish strategy of buying off, or blackmailing, the elites of White societies, to guarantee their protection from the angry peasantry.
The whole dynamic feels very much like a pressure cooker left unattended for too long. An irresistible force meets an immovable object. No one will give an inch. No side will concede anything. Mass surveillance systems and psy ops mindrape are deployed with increasing urgency, while barriers to clear thinking and truthful reality are felled every day. The tectonic plates continue to rub along the fault line, building up immense seismic energy.
Honestly, it will be a miracle if this resolves in a controlled manner.
-
Jeffrey Epstein: Woody Allen role-playing as the Marquis de Sade.
-
Epstein was deliberately creepy. He adorned his walls with the most off-putting "art" and littered his pricey shtetl with pedo-suggestive decoratives.
He had to have known the image he was cultivating and forcing on anyone who paid him a visit. Ask yourself, what kind of person would want visitors and acquaintances to feel uncomfortably creeped out?
And then ask yourself, what kind of visitors would NOT feel uncomfortably creeped out by all that creepiness?
-
My only quibble with the Gadget summary is the assumption that the jews' numerical minority status is easily overpowered or ignored by Whites, when it should be more obvious that jews use their money and information gatekeeping as a force multiplier of their influence over White societies.
Otherwise, yeah, the future for Whites is looking more and more like one that is separated from the concerns of jews.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
A. Not because of the whore bit but because you have no other way…
A juicy Double Whopper….that’s been sitting in a dumpster for a few days…hmmm…should I just pick the maggots off?
which has the nicer snatch?
There’s no room for dignity in this shootout.
Go with a) and call it a transaction. At least the capitalist tint makes it a little less odious.
Dude don’t put things that scary in an RSS feed. Seriously, I was eating when I saw that.
i would do the whore.
i got issues.
b is beyond degrading, it’s physiologically impossible for most.
a may be degrading to some degree, but if you’re cruising across the nevada desert solo there are worse ways to stop and catch a shower.
Don’t forget the most SOUL-CRUSHING choice of all, choice (C):
Paying for sex on a daily basis (or monthly via check) but NOT getting sex, i.e., having a wife or ex-wife.
I would gladly take option a, failing that …shoot myself
The only other thing more degrading than those two options is paying for a whore that looks like that
whores are fine.
whores are the only honest women. They tell you the price up front.
I got some hot footage for those who’d pick choice b):
Don’t forget the kleenex, dawg.
So what’s the etiquette, do I take some flowers to the whorehouse today or not?
you pay for (a) with money.
you pay for (b) with your soul.
yeah, but (a) pays with her soul … although she gets money for this.
[heartiste: most sex workers enter the field voluntarily. the narrative to the contrary is simply total bullshit.]
i think it’s better to sleep with (b) because she has nice hair
[i’d hate to see what your definition of bad hair looks like.]
and beautiful eyes
[if there was any doubt that you are not a persistent troll, this comment should dispel it.]
and by loving her you can inspire her to lose weight and stop smoking.
[her problems are far more numerous than fatness and smoking. she needs a DNA enhancement.]
sleeping with a prostitute just causes further damage to her soul.
[if it’s so soul damaging, why do most whores go into it on their own accord and stay with it for years?]
Maya, look at b. Really look at her. Take off your new agey “I’m okay you’re okay” blinders for a minute.
I’d say that woman’s soul is damaged unless she is a Lesbian. If she is a Lesbian, she had that kind of edgy something I could see doing. If she is heterosexual, she utterly and completely hates herself.
The fact that she has pretty hair and pretty eyes, and though most women do have some confidence issues, we’re not all blind, means she has no remotely rational excuse for not caring for herself. It’s not like she’s extremely old or extremely ugly in raw terms, and would be empowered somehow by letting go of socially imposed grooming schedules or something. We’re not all perfect, but most of us care enough to not just let stuff go.
I’m not ashamed to say that even though as a woman I might hit that, if I was male I wouldn’t go near that with someone else’s dick. No way. Bring the hooker.
Nicole, please tell me the only way you would hit that is vigorously with a twelve inch strap on dildo that had been rolled with superglue and finely shreded glass laced with burning acid and poison which will kill her before she ever fucks again!!!
LOL.
At least with (a) you have a choice of which whore.
A. Not because of the whore bit but because you have no other way…
Even though I said b, yeah. Nothing wrong with the occasional whore as long as it’s not because you’re completely incapable of getting sex elsewhere.
cigstache is back! there’s a blast from the past. i think she was origially one of 10 photos featured in a “rank the chicks” post, maybe in late 2008 or early 2009, then became shorthand for fuglies in subsequent posts. thanks for bringing her back on valentines day, Chateau…
oneitis, maurice?
I choose masturbation.
A. I don’t believe I could ever pay for sex, not when there is plenty sex available in which no monetary transaction is required for the deed. If I was a wretched omega, though, I’d probably pay to have my product consumed.
B. My penis will shrivel in flaccid defiance at the sight of such a sorry specimen.
Agreed.
If it’s one of those high-class whores you see in the movies, then obviously a).
Otherwise, could I just let Bobby Brown punch me in the face?
This isn’t even close. At least the poor bastard who pays a pro because he can’t get any doable chick for free shows that he has absolute minimum standards…and at least one functional eye.
Most paid sex is not with pros.
Anyone who’s made a direct cash-for-sex transaction in their life is a pro in my book.
Clarification: I don’t mean to imply the term “pro” equates to them actually being skilled at their chosen trade.
Jeez, keep posting these pictures of late and the chateau will be where boners go to die.
I know tons of guys who are amazing with women who are quite into hookers and escorts. It has nothing to do with “choose one or the other”. Opie and Anthony talk about it all the time, and those guys are millionaires with 10′s.
Sadly I still feel some sort of dirtyness if I was to ever get a hooker. Probably a societal thing,
What a waste of blue eyes. God is cruel sometimes.
I chose mustache chick. You can’t prove someone fucked her, can you?
I mean I chose mustache chick as the worst of the options. Not as in I chose her.
Actually i’d rather do whitney housten than the creature. Bet the thing smells worse too… Iiii will always love yoooou
Choose the whore.
Keep it in the species.
You mean bipedal smelly nasty looking landwhales are not part of our species(modern present day human beings or homo sapiens sapiens). I’m shocked,(Not meant for you,Gorbachev, as I realize you are sane and intelligent like myself but for the insane or retarded people reading this—Hear my SARCASM!!!) shocked I tell you!!! What would our ruling elite with their supporting feminasties and White Knights/Manginas think?
they’re all whores, fellas.
Just because you didn’t put any cash in her hands doesn’t mean you haven’t done business.
Either way you pay. But money is easier to replace than time or dignity.
this is a guy bro. come on.
There’s no way in hell paying for a decent looking whore is more degrading than fucking the comic book guy from the simpsons
Come one, she isn’t that bad looking. I think she has a lovely chin. And it’s the inner beauty that matters.
A snorlax appeared…
Here’s Tiger Woods’ whore, as eyewash for the snorlax:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_it-hnLPVidA/S2vwIhp3f8I/AAAAAAAABpE/n0hs-yQFoYY/s400/phpThumb_generated_thumbnailjpg.jpg
Faced with that dylema, I take a) forever, especially if the girl I’d be paying was a Prepago paisa… In that case, the deal is clear: I have something you want and you have something I want, “trueque” and everyvbody got what they wanted without bullshitting.
However, I think the normal relationships are some sort of the a) case arrangement, where the man pays for sex, and the woman gets pleasure, commitment and the resources from the man. A very profitable contract for one part one very limiting for the other.
But the relationships that the game enables you to enter are relationships (especially the short term ones and the same night lays) where the only benefit for each part involved in the sexual contract is sex. A quid pro quo of sex.
I’ll take option A. You hoitty toitty mother fuckers have “paid” for sex one way or another. If you say you haven’t you probably have no pubes.
Let’s remember that CH wasn’t saying that all men who pay for sex, grinding or massages can’t get it otherwise. That’s not at all what he said but a number of commenters took it that way.
Reading comprehension guys…reading comprehension.
Meanwhile, many of the 11% who clicked on a) may have done so by mistake because the brain would have said “click on the one you’d prefer”. If those could take back their mistake, the collective answer would be mostly unanimous.
Also, it takes a fair amount of cluelessness not to realize that the girls many alphas fuck for free aren’t amateur whores with other men. Often the guys at the clubs get their free lays long after the virgin cashed in for cash at age 16.
The film “Debbie Does Dallas” wasn’t just fantasy. Teens are really like that.
Sorry: are whores for other men
That is very true. Even the ones with so-called alpha boyfriends still whore themselves out.
This is exactly what happened to me.
My line of thinking is very broad, but don’t you TECHNICALLY pay for ALL women? I mean how many girls are going to let you at the goodies without at least a noticeable investment of time, energy, or money? In most non “pay for play relationships”, don’t you usually end up having to sacrifice a healthy combination of all three?
Rather pay a whore that will be better looking than the trailer park mammoth.
Cigstache,
O Light of my Life,
O Fire of my loins
The irony is that sex for money generally costs a lot less than sex for free.
There are very thirsty men in this world and the woman in the photo has certainly been fucked. You have to wonder how much these poor fellows have spent on dates, gifts, children, divore settlements and, of course, the cost of wasted time and emotional turmoil from FUCKING THAT. Guarantee you that sad cases have dropped more on that (and other horrid women) on a fuck by fuck basis than they would if they have visited high class escorts during the same period.
As a guy who has been in an LTR for 16 years, I now understand the allure of hookers. Sometimes, you don’t want the mess and bother of affairs. Ask Elliot Spitzer or other dudes like him; they don’t have trouble attracting pussy, but they don’t want it interfering with their home lives.
From fringe to the Wall Street Journal in, what, three years? Four years? I dunno.
http://online.wsj.com/article/best_of_the_web_today.html
I honestly can’t believe so many of you picked option b. aside from the fact that fugly is clearly a man with a wig on (why would any fugly decide to fix up her hair but not the rest of the package) I’d rather pay for a decent looking whore than sleep with fugly. If you think about it, we all spend money on women one way or another and even then we spend time on them which could be spent on more ways to get money
Jordan Van Sloot, Batman Edition
for option b it just wouldn’t move.
As if more proof Obama’s beta was needed:
http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/02/obamas-valentines-day-advice-114421.html
B is more degrading by far
C’mon, ya judgmental bastids… all bodies are good bodies!