a welcome send-up.
Where pretty lies perish.
There is a kernel of truth in this meme, which is why it resonates. But as with all memes, full truth often is not so easily encapsulated.
Women have some moral and actionable agency. They make personal decisions based on innate desires, just like men do, except framed by their female nature.
Women's poor life decisions and political insanities are not entirely the fault of jewish agitprop. Their liberation, a predictable consequence of late stage empire trajectories, removes patriarchal guardrails that had channeled female hypergamy away from reckless manifestations. "Feminism" becomes the easy choice for modren men whose own manly virtues have fled them.
But, women by nature are also consensus seekers, and like a dog without a pack leader, feel unmoored and anxious when there is no social consensus for them to follow and mimic. Women become "bitey" under those conditions, and unloveable. This reality of female nature makes it possible for malignant outsiders, like the jews, to manipulate female consensus-seeking by substituting the organic consensus of White male society with the alien consensus of subversive jewish values.
Once the new consensus is established in the void of the surrendered traditional consensus, women flock (heh) to it, even if it is harmful to them over the long run.
What I am getting at here is that the correct lens through which to analyze the behavior of modren White women is one that recognizes their agency and the share of blame they must incur for their bad choices and even worse politics, while also recognizing the imposition of a foreign virus that has hijacked the emotional needs of our women to direct its expression to foul ends.
The inevitable decay of empire virtues coupled with the inevitable subversion of jewish influence is a force multiplier of White female lunacy and race treason.
In practical terms, what this means is that White men face a choice: place all blame on their women, no blame on their women, or a mix of blame and leniency.
The All Blame option leaves jewish agitprop in place, an intolerable compromise.
The No Blame option requires the complete disenfranchisement of women from politics and much of the consensus-shaping culture. Effectively, women will be treated like children with limited rights and limited accountabilty.
The Blame and Leniency option removes jewish agitprop while simultaneously shaming women away from self-destructive politics, race betrayal, and personal behaviors that cheapen their value to White men.
This is why I have maintained all along that the WQ and the JQ are at once inseparable yet unique enough in their attributes to come under separate scrutiny.
White knightoids for some low-T reason are butthurt about this fundamental truth.
Protestantism is the child of Hajnalism. When Whites of Northwest Europe became more individualistic and "bootstrappy", it inevitably followed that those same Whites would chafe at a universalizing religious authority and strike out on their own.
It's somewhat comical to consider the irony of the Catholic Church's ban on cousin marriage, which set in motion the genetic selection for more individualistic Whites, was the very seed which grew into the dominant schism that fractured the Church.
When White racial rightists were a nonthreatening circus sideshow, establishment conservatives of the jewniparty felt comfortable winking and nodding at their grievances.
Now that White racial rightists are drawing immense interest and gathering followers by the millions and becoming a major threat to the jewniparty, establishment conservatives have frantically pivoted to dowsing the fire of White rage in the hope of quashing the only real solution to the problems that these cuckservatives pretended to care about.
Most people don’t know that Frank Sinatra has an arrest record and a mugshot to match. The reason for his arrest may be even more surprising. The official charge? Seduction.
This seemingly archaic charge was generally applied when a man convinced an unmarried woman of good repute to engage in an inappropriate encounter with him. There was generally a promise of marriage that was never actually forthcoming, thereby ruining her reputation.
In 1938, a 23-year-old Sinatra found himself in just such a situation, and he was officially arrested and booked for Seduction. The charge was eventually dropped when it was discovered that the supposedly single woman was in fact married. Later that year, armed with this new information, the original charge was revised slightly, and Sinatra was again arrested, this time for Adultery.
https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/celebrity-mugshots/frank-sinatra/
It's interesting that at a time when the patriarchy that feminists decry ruled America, a man could be arrested for "Seduction" or Adultery.
Now, in the ashes of the patriarchy and in the full flower of the gynarchy with its contraception and abortion handmaidens, a man can pump and dump his way through a small army of feminists with nary a disruption to his hedonistic lifestyle.
"Now what?"
I'm sorry to inform Scott Greer that the answer to that question is not:
"For example, on my podcast, Greer talked about why he opposes white nationalism."
Hard work like that will assure these girls grow up to become women who don't participate in vagina monologue street protests.
jews very rationally (from their tribalistic perspective) fear that Whites closing the door to immigration will induce Whites to reconsider the wisdom of having opened the door to jewish migrants, especially after it becomes common knowledge that jews were and are at the forefront of keeping those Gates of Toledo (Ohio) open to nonwhite immivasion.
jews want unlimited, perpetual access to White nations to strip mine for the benefit of jews, and they have calculated that the best way to assure that outcome is to flood White nations with nonwhites so that jews do not stick out in a supermajority White society, and that Whites, once numerically swamped, lack the demographic heft to do anything about their race replacement.
Steve Sailer(witz) has a soft spot for the jew Nathan Cofnas. He has been signal boosting Cofnas' role in the outing of the plagiarist DEI gaynig Jason Arday.
https://www.stevesailer.net/p/cofnas-on-the-rights-stupidity-problem
But as Joe Jordan revealed, Cofnas merely stole the valor of the Gentile Jack Grove, who was the original journalist to expose Arday's fraud.
Grove's exposé went unpublished, and he was blacklisted, because his reporting embarrassed the DEI party apparatchiks. So why did the System allow publication of Cofnas' revivification of Grove's original reporting about Arday?
Joe says it has to do with Arday making a pro-Palestinian tweet six months ago, which powerful jews did not like, thereby opening the way for another pro-Zionist jew like Cofnas to take down Arday.
https://littoria.substack.com/p/weekly-meander-luigi-mangione-nathan
As for Sailer, he clearly sympathizes with Cofnas's jewish butthurt over anti-semitic memes online.
How many weepy wahms were moved to empathize with Clancy because they saw pics of her sitting in a wheelchair, and it automatically pinged their wahmly urge to nurture the sick and vulnerable?
We all want to know which lone king among us stood at the rampart, holding back the lunatic whordes. 👑
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s Place

http://www.abovethelaw.com/2008/03/study_of_lawyer_productivity_c_1.php#more
Your take? Seems to fit in with your general philosophy, I just wondered what your speculation on the motivations are…