Feed on
Posts
Comments

America, Then And Now

Then:

Now:

Top pic is General Lee. Bottom pic is a present-day descendant of Lee, Lil’ SoyLee, who has spent the last week disavowing his family line in a masturbatory orgy of anti-White virtue signaling.

“Last night I was disheartened to hear Donald Trump, our president, make comments about Robert E. Lee as a great general, as an honorable man. These were far from the truth,” said Robert Lee IV, who is the great-great-great-great nephew of the general.

“Robert E. Lee fought for the continued enslavement of black bodies. It was for state’s rights, yes, but it was for state’s rights to own slaves,” added Lee, who is an ordained minister.

Trump’s comments made Lee “saddened by the state of our nation,” he said. “But I’m encouraged because we are going to work to end this,” he added. “We are going to vote. We are going to show Donald Trump that white supremacy has no place in … our government. We are going to show him who the people are and what really matters in this nation.”

Lil’ SoyLee has that demonic pedo-smirk. It’s a thing among leftoids.

Heather clarifies,

He is not Robert E. Lee’s progeny. He is related as a distant nephew.

He definitely has gayface and may even have a few jews in the wood pile. Also, he’s Episcopalian, which really explains it all, tbh.

Yeah, my gaydar is pinging as well. I’m also picking up effeminate sociopath vibes.

PunishedRedux notices the obvious,

This is just 4 generations apart. Modernity took a bloodline of great warriors and leaders and turned it into this in just about 4 generations.

Strong men create good times.
Good times create weak males.

You know the rest.

PS Read the Twatter thread on this topic. The White masses are awakening from their apathetic slumber.

Imagine being so hollow that you take every opportunity to disparage your own blood, who was, infinitely greater than you, and a hero.

***
Just IMAGINE being part of such an illustrious bloodline and throwing it all away

***

I cannot fathom this kind of treachery. Certainly this is what Judas must’ve felt when he got the silver from the high priests.

***

fellas, we gotta stop them putting hormones in the drinking water at any cost

***

Consider the “Iron Youth” of just one hundred years ago, versus the spoiled, angry squeamishness of today’s people, young and old. The 18th century was most certainly our high watermark, the tumultuous destruction from which we have never recovered.

and no, no panoply of consumer goods or creature comforts will resurrect that, before anyone says “but look at how many baubles we possess!”

***

It’s the hormones in our meat. It’s dropping our testosterone levels.

***

Must have been a kink in a helix… [ed: woke to genetic mutational overload]

***

Emperor Marcus Aurelius died in 180. By 193 the Praetorian Guard literally auctioned the Imperial Throne for $. Decline doesn’t take long.

***

I’ve never seen such a punchable face! [ed: cuckpfeifengesicht]

***

All his frown lines are horizontal submissive lines unlike the vertical lines of a furrowed brow.

Lil’ SoyLee has his eyebrows raised in the universal signal to bathhouse patrons that he is ready to present his mouth for gloryhole duty. That’s where all those horizontal wrinkles come from.

PPS Four generations is enough time for genetic degeneration to have established itself in the wake of cultural degeneration. Or: We’re not getting out of this mess without a major reset and rivers of salty shitlib tears.

81 Responses to “America, Then And Now”

  1. That means he’s also a descendent of the Washington/Custis family tree.

    How the mighty are fallen.

    Like

    • JironGhrad says:

      Fuck that guy. Great-great-great-great “nephew”? How many worthless generations dribbled out to get THERE? My great-grandfather (yes, father’s grandpappy) fought for Sherman. His blood is so diluted it’s practically not even blood, like Fauxcahontas. Somebody get him a DNA test.

      Like

  2. Let’s hear from an actual descendant of REL, not a faggot Elizabeth Warren grade freeloader.

    Like

  3. Greg Eliot says:

    Too bad the one-drop rule doesn’t work in reverse, amirite?

    Like

  4. Cesare says:

    Equally appalling is the fact that his association with the Episcopalian church really DOES explain it all. That was once a serious institution that fostered men like Lee and his illustrious, courageous ancestors. Socialism and it’s degenerate agenda destroys and enslaves everything in it’s vague proximity.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Canterburian Papists are friggin White J00z.

      Quakers, Wesleyans, Unitardians, and Canterburian Papists.

      What a race to the bottom.

      It’s like that new Murdoch Murdoch video, “Change That Matters”, where Juan McAmnesty & S@tan are french-kissing in He11.

      Like

      • guest says:

        It’s a race to the bottom because like I say below the unpozzed have all left and are known by different names now. There are fine “Canterburian Papists” still out there.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “There are fine “Canterburian Papists” still out there.”

        Gnawing on Je$us’s flesh and sucking his bl00d every Sunday like G0d-d@mned werewolves & vampires?

        Two words: WHITE. J00Z.

        Like

      • guest says:

        That’s not quite the language I would use to describe the Blessed Sacrament, but I did lol.

        Like

      • Marc says:

        Well Cap it IS what HE said we needed to do. Better than a bland memorial meal in any case.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Mathew 13
      “Listen! A farmer went out to plant some seeds. 4 As he scattered them across his field, some seeds fell on a footpath, and the birds came and ate them. 5 Other seeds fell on shallow soil with underlying rock. The seeds sprouted quickly because the soil was shallow. 6 But the plants soon wilted under the hot sun, and since they didn’t have deep roots, they died. 7 Other seeds fell among thorns that grew up and choked out the tender plants.

      Like

    • guest says:

      The Episcopal Church today, like the rest of the old establishment churches throughout the world except the Orthodox, is a pozzed SJW converged dying shell of what it used to be. The unpozzed have long left to be evangelicals, Pentecostals, Mormons, splinter Anglican groups, trad Catholics. Or they’re boomers just sticking it out. Unfortunately for what’s left of the Episcopalians young shitlibs don’t go to church at all, not even shitlib church of the poz.

      Like

  5. […] America, Then And Now […]

    Like

  6. WHO IS “HEATHER” AND HOW MANY WHITE BUNZ HAVE EMERGED FROM HER 0VEN?!?!?!?!?!?

    Like

    • williamk says:

      Given the fidelity to facts and efficient writing style, its a safe bet that “Heather” is a guy pretending to be a girl online for some reason.

      Like

      • This.

        And it’s for the same reason Elizabeth Warren claims to be Injun—it gives you a leg up. Hell, I’m surprised at how fast “woke shitlords” au Chateau will trip over themselves to agree (read: pedestal polish) any poaster with a female handle.

        Like

      • Tam the Bam says:

        The worthless cumspunj is two to the power ten tree-nigger?
        Personally I’d keep schtum about that sort of tenuous kinship to persons of absolutely no consequence …
        … otherwise ancient and unforeseen foes of the great duke Charlemagne might take issue with me;
        and my sons.

        Like

  7. It’s my understanding that the Medici family line ended with one gay. He died and that was it for the tree after nearly 700 years. DNA by itself doesn’t seem strong enough to keep the energy going indefinitely through the generations of descendants.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Having the wrong ch!ldren by the wrong m@te is infinitely better than having no ch!ldren at all.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Y’all perfectionists, who are waiting for the HB10 supermodel – with a calm gentle feminine demeanor & a heart of gold & who loves kids & who reads Latin, Greek, and Quantum Mechanics for fun – y’all had better get used to fapping off for the rest of your lives, ’cause she don’t exist.

        Like

      • PBR Streetgang says:

        Melania

        Liked by 2 people

    • Lisa says:

      There are lots of descendants of the medici’s just no direct patrilineal descendants. This is very common though, most patrilineal lines don’t last for more than a few generations. Look at all the different houses that have held the throne in the UK. The current house should have changed due to the monarch being female and married, but they changed the rules so that all heirs to the throne, whether male or female, must take and keep the name Windsor.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Ironsides says:

    The most horrific part, perhaps, is that you can still see a family resemblance in the eyebrows and eyes.

    That second visage actually provoked a shudder of revulsion in me.

    Like

  9. Chase says:

    If boys got punched in the mouth five times before they turned 13, the smirks on these fucking faggots would virtually disappear. The weak fearing the strong is healthy for both the weak and the strong.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Scanman says:

      “The weak fearing the strong is healthy for both the weak and the strong.”

      Damn it, sir. I wish I’d have written that.

      Like

  10. Thor says:

    Well, most of what we know about the civil war is bogus.
    Mainly, it was – like most wars – about money. At the beginning of the CV, the federal government had made no attempt to forbid slavery in the South. (Maybe they “should” have, but that is beside the point.)

    The South was essentially agrarian (like most places on Earth at the time).
    The North was starting to industrialize. But they could, at the time, not compete with the UK. So they needed heavy tariffs. Additionally,those tariffs was one of the major sources of income for the feds. (The other source was whiskey tax.)

    So, to the South, being part of the Union made no economic sense.

    From the North’s (i.e. the federals’) point of view, an additional problem with the South’s separation was that it would create a long and practically not defendable border, and goods could have flowed from Europe to ports in the South and then not to just the South but to the North as well.

    Now, after a few years, most people in the North were war-weary and saw little point in continuing the war. The already deepening state (i.e. federation, and its hangers-on) saw things differently, of course. So they created the bogeyman of slavery, which was good propaganda. (The fact that slavery was – even according to many at the time – odious, to put it politely, is true but beside the point.) And Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel was printed in large numbers. And this was used to engage the Northern population. It worked.

    As to REL, remember it is possible to respect and even admire an enemy (particularly easy when you have won, remember “In Victory Magnanimity”).
    Even as you fight him with all your strength.

    Liked by 3 people

    • >>>>> “The fact that slavery was – even according to many at the time – odious, to put it politely, is true but beside the point.) ”

      Are you aware of (((whom))) it was that moved the chattel slaves from Africa to the New World, via (((their))) Iron Triangle of Holland, Cuba, and Brazil?

      Liked by 2 people

    • Carlos Danger says:

      The export duty on cotton from the South was the biggest source of funding for the Union. Being part of the Union was an economic drain on the South. Southerners are/were naturally more independent minded and self sufficient than Yankees by temperament as well. Rural Yankees had more in common with the Rebels than the people pushing for the war in New York, Philadelphia and Boston. The Union’s duties also made alternative cotton sources in Egypt and India more viable which were being developed by the 1860s, creating an incentive for the South to rebel. Most of the cotton was shipped to mills in Britain. There was also the Rothschild angle to break up the Union and weaken it forcing the North to join with Canada and then allow for the South to be absorbed later and bring them back under British rule. That was another piece of the plan you never hear about today. Abolitionists were funded by (((British))) interests to this end for that very reason.

      Like

      • Captain John Charity Spring MA says:

        The USA is and was the playground of Jews.

        The US constitution fully emancipated the Hebrews as the legal equal of whites. It was a first in the West.

        Now, however the Hooknoses did control the slave trade via ship insurance money and other finance mechanisms. Planters were often in debt to them. Yet, many northern industrialists were also up to their eyeballs in debt to the Tribe.

        Your post is confusing and perhaps that’s because the Yids role in the civil war was to hedge bets and profit on all sides.

        Like

      • Captain John Charity Spring MA says:

        Urban white populations in New York were generally pro confederate. New York’s lifeblood was shipping, slavery and cotton.

        The rural farming population in the north was pro Union. Good honest yeomen farmers.

        Like

  11. Hugh Jenniks says:

    it’s that “Do you think I’ll do better playing dominos on cheese than on pasta?”
    face.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. FastEddie says:

    I’ll give you another then and now: the complete sham that is #metoo.

    Out on Friday night with a friend and saw FOUR average to cute chicks who were out at the bar completely by themselves. Keep in mind I live in city consistently rated in the top 5 for violent crime. My once beautiful city held the dubious honor of most dangerous city in the US several years in a row.

    Chaimstream media presents a literal lie. A complete distortion of reality. These chicks dgaf because none of them have actually been assaulted- ever.

    Just 10 years ago, you would never find a broad out on the town by herself. Wouldn’t happen.

    I was hitting on this 34 year old single momz. I don’t think anyone here would rate her lower than a 7. Hot blonde. Skinny. Fakers. Just out solo dick hunting. Said she likes it better than online dating.

    Too many red flags so I got up to leave. She got visibly angry I wasn’t taking her home so I just told her to put her number in my phone.

    Apparently she’s alive because she texted me next day. Leaving that one alone.

    Strange times indeed.

    Glad you’re all my bros.
    FE

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      I was hitting on this 34 year old single momz.

      Don’t get too fast, Eddie. 😉

      Like

    • >>>>> “FOUR average to cute chicks who were out at the bar completely by themselves”

      Four White 0venz, Zero White Bunz.

      And The Ancestors wept.

      Like

      • FastEddie says:

        Solo dick hunting? Cap these are more like
        bunz>>>>> Plan B

        Liked by 1 person

      • No argument, dick hunting hoes are not marriage/bunz/ovenz material, but at some point we will have to take responsibility for our part in turning them into dick hunting hoes.

        Of course there’s multiple factors at play; it’s likely some combination of weak men, opportunistic men, and (((opportunistic men))), but a major factor is alpha widowhood.

        One pump-n-dump by an alpha chad = an entire season of Sex and the City.

        Liked by 1 person

    • guest says:

      Not to be pointy elbows guy but rating post wall women 7-9 just means you don’t spend time around actual 7-9s.

      Liked by 2 people

      • FastEddie says:

        No offense taken. Probably agree with that. My city is true 50th percentile when it comes to broads. Been plenty places where it’s better and plenty where it’s worse.

        Anytime you want to shoot me a plane ticket to the true 7-9 land o plenty, I’m game.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Anytime you want to shoot me a plane ticket to the true 7-9 land o plenty, I’m game.

        Now THAT’S the Fast Eddie we’ve come to know and admire. 😉

        Like

  13. Robert What? says:

    Seeing those pictures side by side of Great Lee and Gay Lee made me so sad as to what has been lost … and then angry. Gay Lee wouldn’t be fit to lick the boots of Great Lee.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I dunno, Holmes.

      Somebody’s gotta take responsibility for Pickett’s Charge.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Read Company Aytch CO. Men stopped fighting on both sides just to get a glimpse of Bobbie Lee. He made a mistake at Gettysburg but he was the best general of the war, except for Stonewall and NB Forrest who lacked his refinement and patience. He is the finest man who ever drew breath. Show some loyalty to the cause.

        [CH: i wonder if it wouldn’t have been better for america in the long run if Lee had won the war.]

        Like

      • No one tougher than N. Bedford Forrest, and that ain’t no sh!t neither.

        Like

      • Marc says:

        I’m just a copperhead at best so I’ll let one of you southern boys red pill our chatelain on the war of northern aggression.

        Like

  14. LeShitlourde says:

    What is it with this queer lingo “Black Bodies”? Why do liberals always have to find some bizzare gay new phrase that just makes your stomach turn…

    Just say “black people” or “blacks” or something. “Black bodies” has this weird vibe to it I can’t quite place.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Suburban_elk says:

      That feeling when you don’t want to listen to YMCA by the Village People but it’s somehow still playing in the background?

      Like

  15. John Joel Glanton says:

    Product of dysgenic mass immigration from effeminate non-Germanic countries.

    Like

  16. Titus says:

    That’s what happens when you let the Ashkenazi haplogroup into your line.

    Like

  17. Gilbert Ratchet says:

    I think the HuffPo has it wrong. I think this guy should be designated Robert E. Lee VI, not Robert E. Lee IV.

    Like

  18. They’re creating their very own Hell.

    I rewatched “The Fifth Element” last night and reimagined it with Corbyn’s match going out.

    Our God is a consuming fire.

    Like

  19. Donger says:

    I wonder what the distinction is in smiling with and without teeth.

    Obviously in good humor the teeth are completely bare. But with these phagg0ts they always have curled lips. It makes me feel like they’re professing (false) glee without displaying any vulnerabilities or openings to attack.

    Chimps bare their teeth out of aggression. Chad’s bare their teeth out of confidence from a) the assumed dominance in any physical altercation b) the fact that the beta won’t bite back c) he’s ready for the chick to bite back (desires it, really).

    Smiling with a lack of teeth has got to be one step below smiling out of apeasement in social hierarchy.

    Like

    • eofahapi says:

      Historically it has been considered not polite to smile showing teeth,, It was considered rough. Naturaly I do not smile with my teeth, it just not come natural to me (unless I am laughing strong) look this fascinating peice of history

      – ” Showing the teeth was for the upper classes a more-or-less formal breach of etiquette. St. Jean-Baptiste De La Salle, in The Rules of Christian Decorum and Civility of 1703, wrote:

      There are some people who raise their upper lip so high… that their teeth are almost entirely visible. This is entirely contradictory to decorum, which forbids you to allow your teeth to be uncovered, since nature gave us lips to conceal them.”

      Like

  20. eofahapi says:

    I always loved this song but did not know about Robert e.lee.. So i’ll read about him

    Like

  21. chris says:

    He has the face of a manlet.

    Like

  22. Carlos Danger says:

    I absolutely love this song

    Liked by 1 person

  23. jimmy h says:

    Trump didn’t even praise Lee, he praised Ulysses S Grant. the Lee thing was blatant fake news by cbs with the usual fake retraction/correction a few days later that got .002% of the exposure of the original fake news.

    so not only is this guy disparaging his own ancestors, not only is he doing it to virtue signal, but he’s doing it to virtue signal over something that never even happened and he was too much of a gullible idiot to question.

    the apple, in this case, has fallen VERY far from the tree.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Coldwarvet says:

    I put the blame on the wimmen. Kinda hard to control the generational decline when the flower of mankind is mowed down every 20-30 years in Flanders’ fields. Filthy heartless whores sidle up to whatever “winning” defines as vogue. It wasn’t the war that drove ol’ Dixie down; it was the “reconstruction.”

    Like

  25. Doktor Jeep says:

    Hence my theory that once “we” (Royal we) have collectively beaten the winter wolves and most disease, we foolishly based civilization on “every man a king who has a castle and a family” and forgot that not every man should reproduce. Optimal human reproductive strategy is warlords (top alpha males) with harems (the best looking women). Losers and weaklings fertilize the fields as cannon fodder. Now the losers and weaklings vote and churn out bigger losers and weaklings. At the apex humans were healthy and smart, then at the start of the decline, Marxism, feminism, socialism, and mercantilism started getting footholds. Now they are full blown movements and default ideologies in a sea of obesity, mental illness, and cancer. All in a space of roughly 200 years.

    Like

  26. Robert What? says:

    ” I wonder if it wouldn’t have been better for america in the long run if Lee had won the war.”

    Just like I wonder if it wouldn’t have been better for the world in the long run if Hitler had won the war.

    In both instances very strong cases could be made when looking at the modern Western world as it is today.

    Like

  27. baked georgia says:

    in the 90’s trump was a guest in the congress when he was talking about fake indians running casinos! back then he was already great

    Like

  28. https://twitter.com/The_Rebbe_ says:

    Existentially, the Left is lesser men pissing on the graves of their ancestors and their bequeathment to us. @roblee4

    — WhitePill (@The_Rebbe_) October 17, 2018

    Like

  29. JCclimber says:

    Disgusted and revolted that I am probably related to that faggot.
    Since I am also related to General Lee, a truly GREAT man. I hope and pray from a different branch of the family, which is most likely as I’ve never heard of this gaydar pinging soyboy.

    A punch in the face is too kind. A hearty kick to the ovaries would be better for that pretend man.

    Liked by 1 person

  30. […] here are apparently un-outraged at Robert E. Lee’s relative’s recent slimy, faggoty denunciation of General Lee and his heritage. All those fat, pasty, open-mouthed gerbils with their stentorian […]

    Like

Leave a Reply