An astute comment from Wrecked ‘Em about how Twatter can maintain plausible deniability while aggressively silencing right-wing dissident voices on its monopolistic platform:
I would bet both of my gloriously large balls that Twitter is leveraging a basic psychometric difference between liberals and conservatives to achieve widespread shadowbanning of conservatives while maintaining plausible deniability. Brilliant, yet pure evil. Here’s how it works: It’s long been known that liberals are far, far more likely to block and unfriend people (even close family) over politics than are conservatives. What does Twitter do? Writes an algorithm that squelches people who are blocked by lots of other people. Twitter: “It’s not us, it’s the al-go-rithm.” Also Twitter: “Shitlibs, do yo thing!”
One way to fight back would be to block the snot out of prominent liberals, especially ones without a blue check. This would force Twitter to manually un-ban them and it’s the manual intervention that’s going to get them in trouble eventually since any record of it will clearly show favoritism towards the left. One suspects that this is why Twitter hands out blue checks to Leftists like candy while being notoriously stingy to conservatives – a blue check is just supposed to mean that you’re “verified”, that you are who you say you are – but it probably also means that the shadowban algorithm (((passes over you))).
Basically, Big Twatter diversity teams have written algorithms which exploit the intolerance of thin-skinned shitlibs, to effectively mass ban and silence anyone on its platform who expresses opinions that are at odds with the Leftoid Equalism Globohomo orthodoxy. Twatter and other tech giants with monopolies on the means of communication rely on the compulsion of shitlibs to swarm complaint boxes and tattle to the high priests about the heretics in their midst, fouling the mood of their safe spaces. (The Butthurt Brigade is really not taking well to the avalanche of realtalk.)
Clever, but we’re onto them. And I believe this infantile compulsion of shitlibs can be used against them, by turning them on each other until their precious anti-White signaling playgrounds like Twatter become unusable from all the screeching, tattling, banning, and doxing.
broke: the internet will mean the free flow of ideas!
woke: the internet has unleashed hate, it must be censored
bespoke: the internet will mean the free flow of pre-approved ideas!
The end game is nationalization of Big Tech and anti-trust breakups of Big Media. (Typical libertardian reply: “build your own media conglomerate”.)
Meanwhile, there are already rumblings of resistance to Big Tech’s stranglehold on the information gateways (a reader calls this reality “Corporate Stalinism”). Blueprints exist for how to destroy Twatter, Faceborg, Apple, Goolag, and Spotify (low T-FAGS). A CA judge has ruled that Twatter can be sued for falsely advertising free speech.
This is only going to get a lot worse for Soylicon Valley before it gets better, if ever. And no amount of disingenuous appeals to “stopping hate speech” will push the Trump-sized genie back in the bottle. The real resistance is begun.
PS Even payment processors are getting in the censorship act and banning political dissidents from use of their services. How much more of this Left-Wing Orwellian Corporatocracy bullshit will we tolerate? The “free market” is failing half of America. Bezos et al are banking on cheaply made chinese manufactured gadgets you can order from the comfort of your fapatorium to help you forget about the jackdorseyboot on your neck.
Yep. And I’m pretty sure the same algorithm is at work at FaceBuk-kake. When the Trumpening habbened, I slowly lost most of my frens, fought a few skirmishes with family and ex-frens, then finally ditched the entire mess. None of my posts were apparently ever seen, even the innocuous ones. Finally bailed on the whole FB mess.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I bailed FB not too long after Trump ripped Megyn an old one after the first debate. By then I had realized I had had too many shitlib “friends” from when I didn’t know any better.
LikeLike
Got sick of seeing the endless leftist drivel babbled out by people I’d thought were non-idiots; didn’t want to know about the rest; and didn’t want to leave any personal information unnecessarily visible in a nest of left wingers. Accordingly, nuked account from orbit.
LikeLike
[…] Chateau Heartiste Twatter is Leveraging Liberal Fragility […]
LikeLike
>>>>> “And I believe this infantile compulsion of shitlibs can be used against them, by turning them on each other until their precious anti-White signaling playgrounds like Twatter become unusable from all the screeching, tattling, banning, and doxing.”
That’s basically what Saint Joseph Djugashvili did in seizing control of the USSR.
First he had a long talk with Kirov, practically begging and pleading with him to pull back from the insanity, but Kirov was a True Believer, and so Kirov was the first to be liquidated.
Then St Joseph decided upon what we would call an “Agree & Amplify” strategy, whereby he introduced an heightened purity of Marxist-Leninist thought, and started accusing the True Believers of being insufficiently pure in their beliefs & actions.
And the True Believers, believing truthfully, could do nothing but agree with him, because to disagree would have been evidence of false belief.
And so their True Belief led them to the Lubyanka, and the bu11et in the back of the head.
LikeLike
tl;dr == You can’t eliminate the j00z until you liquidate the most virulently passionately committed of their goysiche foot soldiers.
And you’re dealing here with a charismatic religious fervor, which simply cannot be reasoned with.
But, as Djugashvili showed, the fervor can be turned inwards UPON ITSELF, and thereby lured into a self-extinguishing su!cide.
LikeLike
“This would force Twitter to manually un-ban them and it’s the manual intervention that’s going to get them in trouble eventually since any record of it will clearly show favoritism towards the left.”
1) What percentage of the general public earnestly believes that Twatter (or FB, etc.) does not show favoritism towards the left?
2) Of that, what percentage would be legitimately outraged (as opposed to tacitly satisfied) upon learning that they do?
3) Of that, what percentage would take action upon that outrage, and precisely what would they do?
Of all the efforts to decuckify the West, the DR3-style eye-for-an-eye fighting on (((social media))) makes the least sense. You’re trying to win a game of Calvinball against Calvin. They set the rules on there, why are you playing their game?
If Twatter is a leftist shit hole the solution is not to use Twatter.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Man, WNs keep lying to themselves crazy-style. We aren’t “winning” anything.
This is ZOG closing its fist on us.
They own virtually every aspect of our existence. They can flip the switch at any time they want. It is also why there will be no collapse.
It all comes back to the Police State. Freedom and liberty are gone. You cannot start a revolution under a Surveillence State. Saint Trump has not done anything to roll it back.
Normies are sheep, good only for being shown. Libertarians are impotent, as they are the only ones left who want freedom (less than 1% of the population).
An honest WN will admit he is not opposed to tyranny, but he wants to become the tyrant, the dictator.
LikeLiked by 1 person
>muh value of liberty
Jesse Lee Peterson pls go.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The end game is nationalization of Big Tech and anti-trust breakups of Big Media. (Typical libertardian reply: “build your own media conglomerate”.)
To be completely fair, this is a bit of a straw man. There are many libertarians who feel that corporations such as Google are tentacles of the government more than they are private organizations and thus should be bound by the First Amendment (and the rest of the Bill of Rights as well.)
“A corporation isn’t private property — it’s only an extension of the state. Yes, that’s what I said. In applying to the state for special powers and immunities, a corporation becomes an _extension_ of the state.”
–L. Neil Smith
We perhaps should be differentiating between cucktarians and real libertarians the same way we do between cuckservatives and real conservatives.
LikeLike
90% of libertarians are cucks. About 30% of GOP voters are cucks. Giving both the benefit of a caveat is a waste of time.
LikeLike
>>>>> “There are many libertarians who feel that corporations such as Google are tentacles of the government”
Tentacles of the ISRAELI government.
Tentacles of the Frankfurt School and Globalist Usury.
Libertardianism is such a catastrophic evolutionary dead end.
I doubt that the Gh0st of Charles Darwin can even be bothered to shake its d@mned head at the libertardians.
LikeLike
Building your own alternative platforms is not libtardian, it’s common sense.
Please see Gab, Bitchute, Infogalactic, Idka, Oneway, Freestartr, etc.
Use alternate payment processors than paypal, square, googlepay, etc. Any bank or processor that virtue signals should be dropped like a hot rock.
Support alternatives if you can’t build your own, even though it’s inconvenient. Have redundancy if your channels are shut down.
LikeLike
Boot or bot, I don’t want the neck-ache.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is there a hashtag for it? I’ve lost more than 100 today. Do we know if accounts are being purged or if it’s follows that are being broken (or both)? I’ve been the victim of latter, where someone I followed I later noticed I was no longer following https://t.co/1jfVUIYpHN
— Audacious Epigone (@AudaciousEpigon) August 16, 2018
I was banned yesterday. Not shadow, just straight up.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Remember The 14 Words.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
So what you are saying is petulant tech-jew fags.
LikeLike
Dealing with the deep state is like dealing with a pathological liar(an experience every man must have once). They never ever ever admit when caught, they merely shift from one good lie to another and one tactic to another…the ultimate test of your frame control and resolve. To someone like Trump who had to deal with these conmen daily(Mafia) while building skyscrapers, its second nature.
LikeLike
“Even payment processors are getting in the censorship act and banning political dissidents from use of their services.!”
yes, not only paypal but even credit card companies and banks are refusing serve to those that fight the poz.
that’s why they want so the “cashless society”, so they can put people out of the economy easily, like they tried with daily stormer.
what they want is worse than communism. they want us to be completely disappeared of the world.
but libertadians will say: just wait for a billionaire to be on your side
LikeLike
The end game is nationalization of Big Tech and anti-trust breakups of Big Media. (Typical libertardian reply: “build your own media conglomerate”.)
If Microsoft couldn’t beat google with bing, what hope does anyone else have?
LikeLike
Soylicon valley, fapatorium, slore….CH, your literary gift makes you a national treasure. Thank you for these priceless gems!
LikeLike