Feed on
Posts
Comments

A reader emails with a Game-related question,

This is between me and a girl who had been uploading videos from one of the gun-grabbing marches. Which route should we go here, the “natural hypocrites (women) have no business voting” route, or the “Low T shitlib men have no clue how ravenously their women desire MAGAmen” route?

This is tight Jerkboy Game right here. The joke about seeing this pussyhatter at the gun range gave me a genuine laugh.

The first line, btw, is a classic neg. “Do you go to this dumb shit because you love being the only pretty girl there?” It’s a type of push-pull rhetorical question: she’s getting the compliment about her looks couched in an insult about her politics and the kind of losers with whom she associates (which itself is couched in a taunt about her attention whoring and need to have her ego stroked).

Anyhow, to the reader’s question: should he segue to “women are natural hypocrites” or “you already want me but your soyboy orbiters don’t know it yet”?

I think he’s demonstrated enough titillating jerkboy attitude to consider moving on from it to less antagonistic banter. She’s already attracted — no girl would ask three times if you’re free tonight if she wasn’t already envisioning sex — so now it’s time to dig for a deeper rapport, in person.

What are your thoughts, readers?

64 Responses to “A Test Of Your Game: Grabbing Gun-Grabbers By The Pussy”

  1. A 10% conciliatory comment to slip the shiv deeper inside her defenses, and make her think this bad boy gun owner could be salvageable
    Too bad the truth will sting.

    Liked by 1 person

    • That’s not the impression I got – I felt like I was reading the txts of a female who immediately flipped her entire world view around 180-degrees just as soon as her Hamster got a sniff of some actual Testosterone in the ether.

      It was so stunning that it read as though we’re talking bipolar or even multiple personalities.

      Liked by 3 people

      • traitors first says:

        @ Captain Obvious
        “bipolar or even multiple personalities”
        I along with others here at the Chateau appreciate your work (pictures not always included in that appreciation). Having said that you keep going on about cluster b, cluster c, etc. All you’re doing is trying to clinically diagnosis these creatures as WOMEN.

        Like

      • trav777 says:

        She asked 3 times. End of story…does this really need to be overanalyzed?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jesse James says:

        Zero reason to not be balls deep in the “failed hopes and dreams” of her several loser beta orbiters. I’d give mad MAGA-millions points for actually bragging to her friends about how she’s “working hard” on changing his view. Then not ever call again.

        Leave her to revel in their despair. Guaranteeing that one more desperate feminist butch wife doesn’t breed.

        Like

  2. barbaresco says:

    I dunno… I may have gotten too old to even fake interest in a SJW, no matter how pretty, and no matter for how short a time, and no matter how hateful the hatefuck. Some of this PC posturing has become so off-putting to me, it taints the whole girl like a big, ugly tattoo would.

    Alternatively, if I was simply *that* interested, I guess I’d try to make her grow up–short- to medium-term.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Jay in DC says:

      “I may have gotten too old to even fake interest in a SJW, no matter how pretty, and no matter for how short a time, and no matter how hateful the hatefuck.”

      This is low hanging low effort fruit. And personally, since we cannot start the “Cleansing” yet, using my cock as a weapon is a close second. It is usually the most leftist women that are the most sexually deviant and looooove a good hard choking out. I’ve had bitches writhing under me orgasmically in what looked like their death throes.

      It always fascinated me how open to physical domination and abuse so many women are. It speaks volumes about the female psyche / id. I use to find it disturbing at first when I was closer to blue pill in nature. Now? “I do it just to watch their expression change” -Tony Soprano (as a different mobster)

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        if there is an actual “cleansing weapon” for women it’s ostracism, not hatefucking.

        the most hateful thing a guy can do to a woman is ignore her. in her hypergamous pea brain, abuse = love because abuse = passion. no passion = no love = osctracism/invisibility/unattractiveness

        props for the shitlord rationalization though.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Strawful says:

        “It always fascinated me how open to physical domination and abuse so many women are. It speaks volumes about the female psyche ”

        This was the worst and most illuminating red pill i ever discovered.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        It’s all about the pain of natural v@ginal ch!ldbirth.

        S/P the pill & the IUD, they aren’t experiencing that pain anymore, and their Hamsters will do anything to get just the slightest little twinge of it.

        Like

  3. plumpjack says:

    a girl pushing so hard to hook up kills my man tingles, but whatever.

    he could say anything at this point. she’s easy. no need to overgane. send a time and address. or just ignore and go hang out with a girl who’s less trashy.

    Liked by 5 people

  4. When womyn are eschewing and fast forwarding through the fluff, and asking straightforward, logical, point A to point B questions about logistics and what you’re doing tonight, they want to get banged (by you).

    In like Flynn.

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      The key is in how you transition… If you say “WANT TO GO OUT!!” you are dead. she is still fishing for your validation… Once she gets it, she flips the script and looks like you are chasing. You need to sliiiiiiide through this test. answering plainly will kill tingles… something like

      Her:So you’re not free tonight?

      You:Usual saving the world stuff. I might be tempted, depends on your offer.

      Liked by 2 people

      • >> “I might be tempted, depends on your offer.”
        — Sentient

        This is asking her to lead… and she might offer a time/place/thing that he doesn’t want… and then he’ll have to straighten the plan out anyway… women suck at planning.

        He is better with leading toward what he wants (“be at the cause, not at the effect”)… if he wants to fuck her… which I assume he does.

        >> When womyn are eschewing and fast forwarding through the fluff, and asking straightforward, logical, point A to point B questions about logistics and what you’re doing tonight, they want to get banged (by you).
        — Saunders

        Saunders is right about these straightfwd “A to B” logistics…

        Her: So you’re not free tonight?
        You: Come over. My place, 7.

        Or…

        Her: So you’re not free tonight?
        You: You sound like you’re dying to buy me a drink…
        You: XYZ place. 7.

        Move it along logistically… and if he wants to “soften it up,” he can do that in person.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sentient says:

        Her: So you’re not free tonight?
        You: Come over. My place, 7.
        Her: I can’t I have XYZ (sad face)

        And the trap is sprung… Don’t confuse what leading means. Leading isn’t issuing a proclamation. Leading means who is following.

        Like

  5. Shaun G. says:

    She has a one track mind, deflecting everything he throws at her. He comes off as outcome dependent (agree with me) and yet she still wants him!

    Like

  6. Stifler says:

    “Women are the n*ggers of the world.”

    – John Lennon

    Thought of that quote the day I say this girls Instagram feed and it had 2 bimbos with over 100+ likes. 99.5% of them were women. The rest were either beaners or soygoys.

    Like

  7. Tiberius says:

    Kill the bunny already. When it’s convenient set logistics for the bang. No need to over think this or play with your food here.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. […] A Test Of Your Game: Grabbing Gun-Grabbers By The Pussy […]

    Like

  9. Sean Fielding says:

    For the physiognomy aphicianodos:

    https://dailystormer.name/opposing-trannies-marry-each-other/

    Like

  10. Declane says:

    This guy is definitely a fed.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. mendo says:

    I like the use of the word “snaps”

    I’d go with the soyboy orbiters line.

    [CH: now that i think of it, Soyboy Orbiters would be a great title for a tom wolfe-ian novel.]

    Like

  12. TheCoolah says:

    “Bring the movies.”

    Like

  13. >> She’s already attracted — no girl would ask three times if you’re free tonight if she wasn’t already envisioning sex

    Agreed. She is doing more work than you would ever expect a girl to do… I assume they are already fucking.

    Good for him… she loves this guy.

    >> This is tight Jerkboy Game right here
    >> I think he’s demonstrated enough titillating jerkboy attitude to consider moving on from it to less antagonistic banter.

    You know a guy has “mean game” when CH is advising your go for rapport.

    ….

    Lance Mason from PU101 used to say that push/pull works when “I’m Andre” is combined with “You’re Special.”

    So this guy has masterfully demonstrated “I’m Andre” (=alpha)… I think he could add a bit of “you’re special.”

    That isn’t necessarily rapport… but a little “sugar” to add to his BIG LEAGUE “salt” game.

    Like

  14. Hey now says:

    “It’s complicated.”

    “What do you mean?”

    “Meet me at the range and I’ll explain.”

    Like

  15. Greg Eliot says:

    The joke about seeing this pussyhatter at the gun range gave me a genuine laugh.

    Indeep, a high caliber jest. 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  16. As other commenters noted, she’s already attracted so no need for him to push the envelope so much.

    Would love for you to make a post on how to utilize being pro-gun to help with game (pics with guns for online profiles, dates at the gun range, displaying a gun at the house, etc…)

    redpillindian.blogspot.com

    Liked by 1 person

    • Are you a cow-worshipper?

      Like

    • Vagina dominator says:

      He comes here and instead of adding some value, he just repeats (copies) what other commenters have said and then he makes a request to CH to make a post on something for him.

      Take, take, take. Contribute nothing. They cannot help themselves. Nature’s free riders.

      Like

      • aryaavart says:

        He’s confused. He’s forgotten that worshipping weapons is the highest virtue।।

        He needs a slap, just like you lot।।

        ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾ।।ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ।।

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        and hawks his blog on the back of Le Chateau…

        Like

    • aryaavart says:

      You sound like a homosexual।।

      Go get married instead of trying to play the game & Messing up your own society with this poison।।

      These men envy the position your society is in & most of them deserve it more than you as they’re not beta cucks who view weapons as just a way to get women।।

      You deserve the gulag & gang rape by pakistanis daily।।

      Fkn melech minded dalit।।

      Like

    • aryaavart says:

      In case my other comment doesn’t go through, you’re a disgrace to your people।।

      Like

    • aryaavart says:

      I guess it auto blocks profanity।।

      You’re a disgusting excuse for excrement.

      The Aryas worship weapons as a manifestation of Devi & you sit here fully converted to christianity & liberalism hoping some 400 white whale will like a 5ft 80lb Indian dude if he posts a pic of a shotgun on Instagram।।

      It auto blocks profanity so essentially Panjabis are banned here, so I’m out।।

      Like

    • bolg says:

      damn streetshitters bootleg everything. xfaggotron pushing its’ millions of blogs is plenty enough thxbye

      Like

  17. Strawful says:

    Game recognised.

    Uncaring asshole would make a soyboy joke while setting up a meet, with the tone that you can just fit her in.

    Like

  18. Hoggler says:

    IRL, I’ve discovered women have way less tolerance for push-pull than Heartiste makes out. I’m in the Sydney market, where women have much higher than average negative emotions, #metoo culture puts women in a constant state of hyper-vigalence and anger. I would be a poster boy for the male patriarchy (tall, white, blue-eyed, chiseled jaw. Physically I’ve got it nailed).
    I find I have to very finely calibrate my jerk boy game, and women here will readily torpedo your efforts (ie. block you) if you start tapping into their negative emotions too deeply. I have both over-calibrated and under calibrated my jerk boy game, depending on the girl. I’ve found that tending to the ‘being nice, but not too nice’ yields me much more pussy. Jerk boy from the outset risks losing any initial investment from the girl. I find I get away with being a jerk works much better after I’ve already banged them, keeps them coming back for more. There’s no silver billet, one size fits all approach (I feel many men look for simple solutions when it comes to this matter).
    Women do not place a premium on looks at all and guys project this way too much. I have been rejected by women who I’ve seen hooking up with gnomic looking soyboys soon afterwards. Very confusing and goes against established Heartiste wisdom.
    I love Heartiste and I’m ready to take down the Joo word order once us whiteys get out shut together and unite!
    Keep it up CH. you’re the only voice of reason in a grossly unreasonable world.

    Like

  19. Anonymous says:

    From here, just set up the logistics with a matter of fact assume the sale “be over at 9 o’clock wearing that one dress you know I like”. She’s already begging for he booty call thrice over, and he just gamed her fantastically with two tight negs and and an A&A DQ (joking about himself being hardcore con). Plus the preselection of her apparently knowing and accepting that she’s a side piece (asking about his gf). No need to overgame, just set up the logistics now.

    Like

  20. Doktor Jeep says:

    I once made a woman go silent and just stare at me at an anti-gun rally. I was there to counterprotest.
    She gave me the “why do you need a gun” deal.
    Instead of the usual cuck answer that floats about, the “I need….” reply, I simply said to her “I have guns because I can”.

    She just stopped and stared at me in silence but the look on her face made me wonder if she squirted a little. She must have. I’m getting a boner thinking about it.

    Like

  21. Why bother? Have some standards, dude.

    Like

  22. Marc says:

    Mod – OGFA (only good for anal)

    Like

  23. Magus says:

    I absolutely love the use of Church Game, or whatever you called it in that previous post, where you were talking about telling a girl you were getting out of bed early to go to Church.

    Like

  24. roryslife says:

    The guy is using to many words. Shorter to the point.

    “Drinks tonight. Bring your pussy hat.”

    Like

  25. Tinderbox says:

    By all means. She’s already trying to set up the date. Stop talking and seal the deal.

    Like

  26. Jax says:

    This chick is a political transient. She really isn’t a political activist but rather a virtue signaler who floats where the political wind blows. She doesn’t care about the politics, she cares about how politics make her feel. She wants to feel virtuous and apart of something “positive” (the children!) even though she really has no idea what she’s fighting for or the implications. Women generally aren’t into guns so this is an easy fight to be apart of with little cost to themselves.

    This is the proper way to handle it. Casually, but sharply scold her and pierce her politics. My estimation is she can be swayed are at least forced into submission. And women looooooove submission.

    These situations aren’t salvageable nor worth the investment when you are dealing with true blue political militants. The best course of action with those is to mock them, mock their politics, then finish them off by laughing at the type of men they think they want.

    I have managed to turn the tide in my favor when the women really start to think about the type of men that share their politics.They rarely stop to think of the type of men that share their pussy politics. When they do, they sometimes start to take a different tone. That’s usually my last approach with those militant types; humiliate them by talking about their romantic dating prospects and what what losers they really are.

    “Have fun with your soy latte drinking half man. What fun it will be that you and him can share skinny jeans and scarves. Maybe when your house gets broken into, he can engage the intruders with gender fluid poetry instead of a gun.”

    Like

  27. yewotm8 says:

    Anything more is overgaming at this point. Proceed towards sex while remaining wary of a last minute hard shit test.

    Like

  28. Henry Mueller says:

    No matter how often it happens, I’m still surprised sometimes by how well “You’re wrong” game works.

    Just for kicks, I tried this approach with a girl standing in line for food recently. Turns out she was a carpet muncher. A 4 or 5 at best. But she started loudly talking sh!t about “p$ssy power feminism” and all that, in line.

    Finally I couldn’t stand it any more and just started playfully contradicting everything she said. I called hardcore activists losers with no lives, and to my great surprise she said “Well..I don’t actually go out protesting and all that, my girlfriend is more into that…”

    Point is, during a five minute interaction I actually had her by the end leaning against me while asking my help looking up a book I had recommended. We could call this the “I hope you’re not like those other girls” frame, and it’s another old school tactic that still works like a charm.

    “You’re too pretty for the p%ssy hat march” might be the ideal game for these types. Most of them are in it for the virtue signalling as mentioned. And all women want to be perceived as special, especially at the expense of other women. Even if that woman is her girlfriend.

    Convince her that this SJW nonsense is for losers, and then it’s a win-win either way. Either she sees the light and comes to the right side. Or she just pretends to in order to submit to you.

    Like

  29. K Young says:

    As I am becoming more of a believer as of late, I’m a big fan of new or old testament game. In this context above, it’s the inverse of new age chic crack. Heritage America is unashamedly family and values oriented, vs the moral relativism etc of the left. The reversal works the id. I like it

    Like

Leave a Reply