Feed on
Posts
Comments

The Myth Of The Bitchy Hottie

Physiognomy is real. Which means bitchiognomy is real. You can judge a woman by her cover. As tomjones says,

In my experience, pretty girls have the best face/body AND the best personalities.
Ugly hideous bitches have ugly hideous personalities or okay personalities. I think there is a connection between the physical beauty of the person and the beauty of the soul. Ugly ones still hope that an attractive man will get them pregnant. Then, they can trap the guy.

The Bitchy Hottie is another one of those pervasive sexual market myths that likely has its origins in the seared and stung egos of striver beta males who received polite rejections from hotties and later, reeling from the plugged up poison of their blue ball hallucinations, post hoc rationalized their loss as a victory over a bitch. Genuinely bitchy feminists are also likely candidates for fueling this myth, given that God’s miscreations have an incentive to blaspheme the good nature of Nature’s winning hands.

Yes, it’s a big myth that hot girls are bitches. Some are, sure, (I’ve dealt with a few sassy strumpets), but on the whole pretty girls are nicer than ugly girls. If a woman is treated well her whole life because she’s pretty, she’ll tend to think the world is a great place overflowing with kindness and love. Many betas confuse hot girl rejection for bitchiness, when in reality most hot girls reject men in exceedingly polite terms. It’s the fugs and marginal girls who are nasty bitches when they reject the betas they think aren’t in their league.

Here’s a handy dandy hierarchy of what I’ve observed is the “Bitchiness Quotient” of women at various SMVs along the belle curve:

A BQ of zero means the girl is nearly always exceedingly nice without being cloying. A BQ of 10 means the girl is a fat feminist writer for Salon. (“HB” = Hot Babe. “PJ” = Plain Jane. “UG” = Ugly Girl.)

VHB10 -> BQ 0
HB9 -> BQ 0-1
HB8 -> BQ 1-2
PJ7 -> BQ 3-4
PJ6 -> BQ 5-7
PJ5 -> BQ 6-10
PJ4 -> BQ 4-10
UG3 -> BQ 1-8
UG2 -> BQ 1-4
UG1 -> BQ 0-3
VUG0 -> BQ 0-1

I hope the CH readers have noticed the patterns in the above HB-BQ correlations. First, there’s a general leaning among hot babes and ugly girls toward niceness over bitchiness. Hot babe niceness is explained above (i.e., it’s easy and fun to be nice when the world loves you). Ugly girl niceness is a result of low self-esteem. When you are beaten down by life and have lost all confidence in yourself as a romantic catch, you’ll be nice to people more out of necessity than good will.

UG niceness is similar to the Niceguy’s deference; neither one feels as though they have social elbow room to fly their hate flag or even show mild disapproval when slighted. Neither one would dare express their true feelings to another person or a group if they believed there was even a tiny chance their words would be misconstrued as anything less than fulsome praise or abject supplication. This is the prison low value people live in; a cramped world in which all thoughts are checked to avoid the omnipresent threat, always nearer for them than for their betters, of social expulsion.

However, one difference between the insta-personalities of HBs and UGs is the variance. HBs are rarely unpleasant. In contrast, UGs on the boundary between ugliness and mediocrity span the niceness gamut; not a few are repulsive bitches, having turned to the snark side by an Inner Palpatine coaxing them to embrace their pariah status. Smart, overeducated UGs are the most prominent, and worst, example of this breed. They survive by banding together, so you will rarely deal with them mano-a-monster.

The BQ sour spot is the middle of the female beauty curve, smack dab in Plain Jane country. The 4s, 5s, 6s, and sometimes 7s are the girls who were born into bitchiness, molded by it, and have emerged from the other side skilled at lashing out in the general direction of any approaching man. Plain Janes have enormous chips on their shoulders from endlessly straddling that labial wedge between cute-enough-for-betas and not-cute-enough-for-alphas. The pressure of this wedge is exacerbated by the entitled self-assurance of the omega and beta males who hit on them without their consent, and by the evasiveness of the alpha males who toy with them with their consent.

Plain Janes are as likely, if not more likely, to be bitches as to be half-hearted nicegirls, and when they’re bitches they aim to be the biggest bitches on earth. The Plain Jane is occasionally nice, but then only to men well out of her league, for whom she nurses an unreasonable expectation of reciprocated desire, partly inflamed by the paternal kindness of these men toward her. To all others, including hot women, the Plain Jane is an annoying cockblock too full of herself, unless she has been blessed with a predisposition for circumstance-immune niceness.

High BQ PJs often wind up childless spinsters by their mid-30s because they couldn’t suffer the indignity of settling, especially if they have wasted their prime nubility years on a quixotic quest to ensnare alpha cock beyond the pump and dump statute of relegation. HBs don’t settle (much), and the UG’s gratitude for any man, however lowly, who shows her love overrides her distaste for settling.

Aging beauties are another demo that has a high BQ. Totally understandable, if still noxious. The 21-year-old HB8 who by inevitability of age has degraded to a PJ6 as early as her 30th birthday is right down there with the overeducated UG0 in quickness to resort to repellent bitchiness for no apparent reason. The cunty cougar and odious spinster aren’t stereotypes for nothing.

Ya know, patriarchy would solve all these problems that bedevil mediocre women.

191 Responses to “The Myth Of The Bitchy Hottie”

  1. Keep them coming Mr CH. you’ve been knocking them out of the park of late.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Haven M. says:

    yeah, I noticed this. It’s gotten to the point that I don’t like dealing with ugly girls because of that bitchiness. There’s a guarded nature about it too. Liek, “you’re just hitting on me because you think I’m easy because I’m ugly” But a belle laide will be flirty fun time.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. I’d take metadeath over a jewish girl

    Like

  4. Random Guy says:

    There’s actually a study to support this.

    Basically that guys think they do better; the more attractive the woman is but at least part of it came down to the more attractive girls admitting that they pretended they liked the guy to be nice to him.

    Whereas the ones not rated as attractive tended not to do that.

    Not the same as being straight out “bitchy” of course. But yeah; it’s easier and funner to ask out a attractive woman.

    Usually the “bitchy” hot chicks are the ones that are “just barely” hot and know the wall is going to come crashing down on them, sooner than they would like.

    More pressure on them to get settled down so they tend to reject harsher and quicker. At least going by my observations.

    Though honestly; I’ve never really had a “bad” rejection, some are kind of formal the ol’ “sorry I got a boyfriend” but for the most part, women seem to take it as a compliment if you ask them out.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Sean Fielding says:

    In other news, global capture the flag continues. Pol 4, Shia hwndu nothin’ 0.

    Update on #HeWillNotDivideUs Flag:-someone appeared on the livestream wearing a mask-livestream was taken offline-the flag is now gone pic.twitter.com/RfICYMd2Q0

    — /pol/ News Network (@polNewsNetwork1) March 23, 2017

    Like

  6. sigsawyer says:

    When betas say ‘hot girls are bitches’, what they mean is ‘7’s are bitches’. (Betas will overestimate the hotness of marginally pretty girls to make themselves seem better)

    7’s get a lot more and a lot more inept flirting from lower tier men than 9’s, making them much more jaded against male intrusion. Courtship with 9s, if you don’t get rejected right away, is much more pleasant.

    Liked by 2 people

    • @Sig
      Bingo! The betas don’t know what 8.5s, 9s or 10s (models and attractive young actresses) look like in real life. They’d shit their pants if by some bizarre accident they were to talk to one.

      Liked by 2 people

      • wolfie65 says:

        ‘Hot girls are b1tches” = a real life version of Revenge of the Nerds, except without the revenge.

        Like

      • Haven M. says:

        how would one even talk to one of those gals in real life? As a customer? You have to get in those social circles first.

        Like

      • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

        I once banged a Victoria’s Secret model who told me later I was the only guy in the whole place that hit on her.

        Like

    • The only genuine VHB10 I’ve ever known personally was in my training class long ago with my company at the time. Early 20s, she’d had a minor commercial modeling career and was able to produce photos.

      She was completely approachable as a person. She had teased me for using big words in a presentation, so I teased her right back for her resemblance to Kelly Bundy.

      “Hey! LOL!”

      Of course, it’s easy to be pleasant when you have flawless face and body, and you’ve locked in your alpha (she was engaged then…sigh).

      Like

    • blanche says:

      Okay, so here’s a question that I’d love some insight on: there are some (relatively few, but some) rather plain girls in the past that totally get my pecker up. I’ve always wondered why… they aren’t objectively hot, maybe unique looking is a better way to describe them. not classic beauties, certainly not ugly, but probably objectively kind of meh…

      And yet, sometimes there is just something about them that is just sexy as shit. Sometimes it’s the way they smell, their personalities, the way they carry themselves, something.

      An example: there’s a E. European chick that works at a bar I frequent. Kind of plain looking all in all. Dirty brown unremarkable hair, good body, but not spectacular, okay face, but these incredibly intense eyes, not beautiful eyes really, just intense and piercing as shit. She’s also very cool and laid back. Earthy, loves to camp, outdoorsy type. Jeans and flannel shirt type of gal, but very feminine.

      I just know she’d be incredible in the sack. It’s a total conundrum why this one, of all the hot women I could bang, gets stuck in my craw.

      Like

      • Sentient says:

        I call them “Dick Twitch” girls… The heart wants what the heart wants… Part of it is probably chemical. Part of it may be, as some have suggested, nature’s way of signalling a strong genetic match for optimum offspring.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        blanche, if you’re sensing strong Natural Chemistry, then go for it.

        [Unless you’d just use her. Never use Natural Chemistry and then discard it. That’s a Cardinal Sin. If you get involved with Natural Chemistry, then you treasure it.]

        Liked by 1 person

      • blanche says:

        Dick twitch girls… hahaha, brilliant. The genetic theory as well. Very profound.

        Liked by 1 person

      • sigsawyer says:

        I’ve had it too.

        Research has shown we’re most attracted to people who have about a fourth-cousin degree of genetic similarity to us. That’s what I’m guessing it is- our hindbrains recognizing genetic compatibility.

        Like

    • pavetack says:

      It’s not just the inept flirting that makes women bitchy. It’s the threat to their social status. ESR and Tomassi have pointed out that attention from lower (or equal) SMV males causes a woman’s peers to re-evaluation her SMV. A 9 can be polite about dismissing a 7’s attention; both she (and more importantly her posse) know he’s out of his league. A 7 approached by a 7 must be dealt with. The woman “knows” she deserves at least an 8 – how dare this person think she’s any less?

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Beautiful Truths Ignored says:

    Hotter = more feminine, in good ways and bad.

    They worship strength. If you exude confidence, they will love you and be all chirpy and cheerful and accommodating and submissive.

    But the same girl will transform into a soul-shredding harpy if she senses a serious drop in your confidence.

    In politics, they also gravitate towards strength; the power nodes of our society (Hollywood, academia, news media, Wall Street, deep state, mainline denominations) support Hillary Clinton’s position on every conceivable issue, and so do hot young things. As you say, life’s been good to them. Why question the benevolent establishment?

    Liked by 1 person

  8. tteclod says:

    “…patriarchy would solve all these problems that bedevil mediocre women…”

    Elaborate

    Like

  9. plumpjack says:

    there’s another biological basis for bitchiness in women: it ensures guys will be turned on the them, particularly the RIGHT guys. nice girls often trigger a guy’s protective instinct, which can inhibit his desire to want to plow her like there’s no tomorrow. a few smart girls understand that there’s some gain in relationship security with strategically-applied bitchiness (girl game).

    when a woman acts submissive towards me right away i get concerned because then I think I might not be able to get it up for them, or that I’ll lose interest. something about that bitchiness increases wood hardness.

    Liked by 1 person

    • 88 says:

      interesting take

      can’t say that’s been my experience.

      there have been a couple occasions where a bitchy chick turned me on but that has been the exception not the rule.

      sure, a submissive girl who isn’t also sending off a bit of a sexy alluring vibe, might be a turnoff because she just isn’t any fun. but i don’t think it’s the submissiveness that’s the turn off in that case.

      at any rate, bitchy girls are a boner killer for me. have no interest in them whatsoever. but give me a submissive hottie who has that perfect combination of subtle sexiness and sweet gentle innocence, and i’m all in.

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        i’m wondering if the bitchiness, besides the beta-filtering kind, comes from some sexual frustration and/or high female libido. it’s usually a pretty thin layer.

        but yeah, the bitch-to-the-core with a meh package is a boner killer. but the “yeah i’m a bitch, but i’m YOUR bitch” is the kind I’m talking about that’s ​begging to service/be serviced.

        Liked by 2 people

      • 88 says:

        ah okay. that makes sense. read you wrong.

        Like

  10. bolg says:

    there is a connection between the meme of the bitchy-hot-girl, the meme of the dumb-blonde-girl, the meme of the dead-fish-in-bed hot girl, the meme of the “outdated & boring” classical/naivist/realist painter schools and the promotion of modern “art”, the promotion of beauty-is-the-eyes-of-the-beholder, the promotion of all-is-relative, the promotion of shit-in-a-bowl is “performance art”, the pushing of deformity as a norm.

    the connection is the source.

    the second reincarnation of vishnu had to say something about it:

    “Anyone who sees and paints a sky green and fields blue ought to be sterilized.”

    –Adolf Hitler

    Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      I used to wonder where the myth of the ‘dumb blonde’ came from, natural blondes are of Germanic stock – no matter where in the world they may live – and those are not stupid people.
      The closest I’ve come to an explanation not involving a (((conspiracy))) is that until relatively recently, most blonde people lived in smaller towns or rural areas, making them appear somewhat ‘naive’ to the ‘sophisticated (….) and often dark-haired city dwellers.
      Which does, of course, not rule out a (((conspiracy))).

      Liked by 1 person

      • Random Guy says:

        Maybe dumb women dyeing their hair blonde?

        Anti-Aryan ww2 era propaganda?

        Like

      • Anonymous White Male says:

        I’ve wondered about this too. I think it is probably an American phenomenon. Probably mostly a New York City and California phenomenon. It may have to do with the movie archetype of the blonde moll of some gangster type. Then, it may have to do with the high SMV of blonde women. Their mothers realized that their daughter was a hot commodity so she began training her early to snag a male as quickly as possible so momma can get blondie out of the house and get some grandchildren. When you are raised to sell the cow as soon as possible, you tend to discount things like education (other than what is necessary to snag male and get children). When you are a desirable and nubile blonde, your mother and other women might tell you, “Men don’t want smart women”. Your father probably doted on you and your helpless act sparked his paternal nature. “How do I work this, daddy?” So he takes care of it. She never learns anything useful for herself other than how to manipulate men. If it works on daddy, why change a winning format.

        I knew this one blonde girl that was a 9. Long-legged, vivacious, fun, loved good times. She dated this guy that was an overachieving beta. Her parents made it clear to her that she could fool around with him but that he would be ditched after high school. While I liked her and enjoyed her sense of humor, I knew she was a gold digger and would be divorced at least once. She would take the ex for a comfortable living for the rest of her life. And, that’s what she did. It is rather disgusting, really, but you know women and their need for security (money). Even though they’re really just a successful whore. There work will consist of shopping, maintaining their looks, attending events, etc. Their only accomplishment will be at least one child who will probably be raised by a nanny. You get more money in a divorce when you have children.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        it’s part of the cultural marxist push to shift the perceptions about beauty/ugliness, brightness/stupidity, right/wrong and so on.

        that way jews don’t stick out like a sore thumb.

        Like

      • Vanamee says:

        Maybe dumb women dyeing their hair blonde?

        this. and the”moll” archetype. the first flurry of bottled blondes were probably shallow, vain, and empty-headed–or at least seen that way by their traditional, patriarchical contemporaries. much like how parishioners at the chateau might look at instagram “models” and the glitterati today.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “that way jews don’t stick out like a sore thumb.”

        That’s also one of the myriad reasons why they want unbridled sh!tskin alien invasions into White Homelands: Because the darker, filthier, scummier, and more immoral a nation becomes, the easier the Jew slides in seamlessly into the background, with few [if any] people even noticing the Jew’s presence anymore.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        blondes can be too trusting and gullible in my experience.

        Like

      • stevetirone says:

        A lot of them grew up in high-trust environments, meaning they didn’t develop a hard shell of wary cynicism, thus leaving them vulnerable to hustles that anyone who grew up with Diversity™ see through in an instant.

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        Well, that’s changing VERY RAPIDLY as we speak……
        #Sweden
        #Norway
        #Denmark
        #Finland
        #Iceland
        #Netherlands
        #Belgium
        #Germany
        #Austria
        #Switzerland

        Like

  11. Sean Fielding says:

    CH, I agree in part with your explanations, but they do lean heavily to nurturism. True physiognomy is largely genetic, at least before the ‘every woman gets the face she deserves by 50’ stage of life, and even that is partly genetic.

    High estrogen is a major force behind the hourglass figure, the small lower face, etc, as you have often written, and it is also a major force in brain development toward those feminine personality features that please men. Lower bitchiness in ugly women might in part be due to the fact that it’s hard to imagine social dominance and ugliness breeding together as personality traits; otherwise ugly people would tend to be leaders and that is fairly rare.

    My guess is that hot chicks are submissive (to high SMV males) in part because of their high estrogen, but ugly girls are submissive because of other factors in the genetics of dominance, factors not so related to sex hormones.

    Biological Calvinism rules.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      BIOLOGICAL CALVINISM [specifically]: Your hindbrain evolved to sense external physical “beauty” as a very likely indicator of internal spiritual beauty.

      BIOLOGICAL CALVINISM [more generally]: Some folks got lucky with the Good genes, and start way ahead of the pack in the race to experience salvation of their immortal souls. Whereas other folks got dealt a really bad hand regarding the Evil genes, and are gonna struggle with the spectre of eternal d@mnation for most of their lives.

      BIOLOGICAL CALVINISM [tl;dr] == Life ain’t fair.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        BIOLOGICAL CALVINISM [specific converse]: Your hindbrain also evolved to sense external physical “hideousness” as a very likely indicator of internal spiritual hideousness.

        Which is why most Skypes look so horrid to us – our hindbrains evolved to sense their Evil, just from glancing at them.

        And if the countenance of a John Podesta doesn’t send the needle on your Pedo-Dar flying off to “11”, then you need to go see a neurosurgeon for a hindbrain transplant.

        Like

  12. I once wrote about this on the Roosh Forum. I called it “The Retail Test.”

    Go into any retail outlet and notice how the cute girls behave. “Can I HELP you!?” Very friendly and open. Then go into a bookstore and notice how the far, blue-haired crowd acts. I once got barked at for not presenting a gift card at the right time.

    Away from work, people aren’t that different, so if you think the blue-haired fat-a*s is magically gonna transform into someone nice, you’re mistaken. She’ll always be sour. After all, she has to look in the mirror.

    The myth of the b*tchy hottie came about for several reasons:

    1). Hollywood J*ews, who are bigoted against blondes and Christians in general
    2). Guys who cold-approach the wrong way and bring out the worst in women
    3). High schools, which encourage this sort of behavior

    But I used to have great “mall game” in my youth, which I’ve written about. So I got to know a lot of girls outside the realm of cliques and such. And it’s a safe bet to sat, the better-looking girls are more often than not the ones with better personalities.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Humdrum says:

    So true. The nicest women I know are also the prettiest.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Pwn says:

    There’s a small minority of pretty girls that are bitches because they use their looks as a power trip in the same way fugs use nasty rejections as a power trip, but to me the trend is clear that the prettier a girl is, the nicer she is.

    What helps fuel this myth is that the distribution of bitchiness in hot girls has fat tails in that they’re either nice or cunts and it stands out even more because hot cunts get away with it.

    Like

  15. jackmcg says:

    Its easy to see why aging former beauties have high Bitchiness Quotient.

    An analogy for a guy to understand: Ever piss away a good bit of money on a dumb purchase? Pisses you off to think about, right?

    Okay, now picture wasting several million dollars with nothing to show for it. You coulda done something great but you wasted it and you’ll never see that much money again.

    That is what a girl who wasted her youthful beauty feels like.

    If you could go back in time you’d put that money in a solid blue chip investment and avoid con artists. But you can’t. Neither can she.

    Liked by 2 people

  16. cortesar says:

    just how sick and deranged you have to be to write this

    A snapshot of London’s magnificent diversity in those injured: French, Romanian, Korean, German, Polish, Irish, Chinese, US, Italian, Greek.

    — George Eaton (@georgeeaton) March 23, 2017

    Like

  17. BC says:

    The BQ sour spot is the middle of the female beauty curve, smack dab in Plain Jane country. The 4s, 5s, 6s, and sometimes 7s

    Which, given the bell curve distribution, unfortunately means that most (western) women have high bitch quotients.

    Like

  18. Funny story I just remembered. Kids have a natural way of sussing out who is attractive and who isn’t. I have a brother around ten years younger and when I first got my driver’s license he’d tag along to where I was going.

    I noticed an interesting pattern. If I bumped into a hot girl I knew from high school, the kid would be all smiles and jokes. But…if we were dealing with a sour-faced girl or woman, he’d slink into the background as if their faces were scary Halloween masks.

    Women have to notice such things. He was too young to “get” girls yet, but he knew what was pleasant and unpleasant. This has to have an effect. When kids recoil, you know you have issues.

    Liked by 2 people

    • 88 says:

      great observation. i’ve seen something similar with my nephew. i went to the store with my brother a couple weekends ago to pick up beer and barbecue fixins.

      my nephew is only around two years old. he was in the grocery cart facing the opposite direction. so while my brother and i walked along, we’d sometimes see him get a big old grin on his face. sure enough, every time he did that there would be a cutie walking up in his line of vision. not the same reaction with the non-hotties.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Ecosse says:

        This is why 90+% of lesbians are ugly, even their own fathers have to force a smile when they see their little girl, everybody cringes slightly when they see them. The constant ego blow must mess with their minds and they gravitate to other screwed up people.

        Is Ellen DeGeneres even human?

        Like

  19. Vanamee says:

    good post, this has been my experience as well. there is probably also the matter of insecure betas reverse-projecting their intim1dation onto the women they’re attracted to, and the high school stereotypes of uppity popular, pretty girls.

    my (regional) high school might have been an outlier, but IME everyone was on a friendly first-name basis (class of 300), with few fights and virtually no bully1ng. of course people conglomerated into groups of friends, but the only group that was genuinely rude, unpleasant, exclusive and h*stile were the nintendo nerds. perhaps a shield they developed in middle school, or undiagnosed sperging, dunno. this was during the mid-’00s, so there’s that. i thought the 21 Jump Street remake was, if nothing else, pretty accurate in its depiction of HS social dynamics

    Like

  20. Reb says:

    They are on drugs. Back me up on this one, gunslinger…

    Like

  21. wolfie65 says:

    Much along the same lines, the worst a$$holes among guys are usually found in middle-to-upper (but not top) management.
    Not The Boss, but his 2nd or 3rd in command.
    Not the owner of the store, but the store manager.

    Like

  22. Adam says:

    Excellent post. You’ve been on fire lately.

    Like

  23. Odysseus says:

    Fellow students and scholars:
    When these articles are written describing changes in female attitude from 1 through 10’s, what is the bell curve distribution of pulchritude? That is, what % are considered 1’s, and how many elusive 10’s does one find in a given population? Regional variances play a great role, obviously.

    Apologies if this has been covered elsewhere. Wisdom appreciated.

    It was common knowledge in California that as you went north from San Diego to Seattle, the average female population became 5-7 unwanted pounds heaver about every 200 miles. That would help explain why San Diego girls are typically very cute and charming, and Seattle land whales anything but.

    [CH: age plays a big role in female beauty rankings. at the prime age for exquisite beauty — 17-22 yo or thereabouts — the tails are thin and the bulk of women would easily hit the 5-8 mark, with more at the upper end than there are at the lower end. but as you move onto older and fatter women the left tail also gets fatter, and you’ll see a flattening and shifting of the belle curve as it fills up with fugs in the 0-4 range and loses hotties in the 8-10 range. now, if you age-adjust the belle curve what happens is that you’ll reset it to a more traditional distribution, with some fugs and some hotties and most women in the 4-7 lumpy middle.]

    Like

  24. Mr Meaner says:

    Has anyone observed elite sportspeople – either coming back from injury, or trying to get match practice – play in a lower league/grade?

    I’ve noticed an interesting sporting phenomenon that often occurs here… They can really struggle. They get dragged down to the level they’re competing against and then have to fight it out in the mud like a hack. Completely unbecoming.

    The insidiousness of it, is that the grade is not that far beneath them that it’s a joke, but it’s just enough beneath them that it throws off their game.

    Of course, this is then used as justification to claim they aren’t “ready” for the big leagues. “He needs more match practice!”

    Bullshit.

    This is what can happen when you game women below your usual standards, and the added fact they can be bigger bitches can really fuck with your head. It makes you believe you have to master “those women” before you can move onto something better, which is total bullshit.

    Leapfrog those bitches altogether.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. bo jangles says:

    It depends on how her dad treats her. But in general too much praise just like too much criticism makes narcissists. Which is why the super hot chick is more vulnerable to the tactic of the neg.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Johnny Redux says:

    I generally have found that attractive girls raised by two parents, where the father is an Alpha, tend to have better personalities.

    Attractive girls raised by single mothers are uncontrollable and devolve into whorish behavior very quickly, throwing away their good genes to the first bad boy who plows them at an early age.

    Attractive girls raised by two parents, where the father is a beta, tend to be spoiled princesses, and more interested in what you can provide for them, rather that what they can do for you. After all, that parasitical interplay is what they have witnessed between mommy and daddy since the were born.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      JR, remember that she tends to inherit aspects of each parents’ behavior.

      So Alpha Dad & Stable Feminine Mom => likely good fortune for the daughter

      Absentee Dad & Unstable Single Mom => likely bad fortune for the daughter

      Beta Dad & Stable [if not particularly feminine] Mom => middling fortune for daughter

      Liked by 1 person

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Yes, Captain, I recognize that for least the Alpha Dad and Absentee Dad scenarios, genetics plays a very strong role in how the little vixen maturates. I do not believe genetics plays as strong a role in the Beta Dad scenario. Beta Dad is probably the norm. That is why greater laws and societal taboos need to be in place, as in Victorian England, to step in and keep the women in check where the Beta Dads, on their own, cannot do a very good job of it. If rules are in place, Beta Dads will follow the rules, as they are by nature rule followers. If that makes sense.

        Like

  27. Better looking people genuinely have better mental health. Being overweight, for instance, is correlated with an array of mental disorders like bipolar. It’s also correlated with low IQ.

    Like

  28. Quicksilver75 says:

    Genetic Noblesse Oblige. When truly beautiful specimens realize their good fortune and can look down upon the less fortunate with warmth & a kind word.

    Liked by 2 people

  29. Corvo says:

    Finally saw the sharia version of Making My Way Downtown on Jootube again – someone with the know-how please save to repost once it gets shoah’ again

    Like

  30. What about bitchy men (GreG Eliot)

    Like

  31. vfm#7634 says:

    “Here’s a handy dandy hierarchy of what I’ve observed is the “Bitchiness Quotient” of women at various SMVs along the belle curve:”

    Yes. This is exactly what I’ve noticed.

    I’ll add that in the error bar ranges specified, that liberal/leftist chicks skew toward the high end of the bitchiness ranges, and the Christian chicks lower. IOW: avoid leftist 4’s and 5’s like the plague — like that famous pic of the HuffPo board room.

    [CH: yeah i didn’t want to get into the deep thickets with this post, but it’s more reflective of urban swpl chicks than non-urban religious chicks. i still think the general trends hold for all groups of women, but leftie plain janes would def have higher BQs.]

    Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      but leftie plain janes would def have higher BQs.]

      The BQ difference would certainly help explain why white Democrat women have a fertility rate of 1.4 versus 2.1 for white Republican women.

      Liked by 1 person

  32. It’s like a girlfriend of mine said YEARS ago: Why are fat girls nice? Because they HAVE to be!

    Liked by 1 person

  33. nomad says:

    Christian chicks you have to be careful with. The pedestal is higher, but the standards, not always.

    Like

  34. Alfonso says:

    I wonder if the bitchy hottie myth comes from the same (((people))) who created the dumb blonde myth

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Why would someone cultivate a personality they don’t need? Looking at female comedians, the ugliest are usually the funniest because they can’t crutch a cock under their hotness armpit and waddle towards a payday. I’m not saying hot bitches *can’t* have better personalities, they’re just less pressured to create one to gratify their self-esteem. You might therefore argue that a buttaface “personality” is inferior due to its origin in insecurity, and I’d agree with you. But hot bitches…don’t have to understand shit. You need a girl with a *little* insecurity so you have some kind of basis for self-doubt that can be manipulated in a long term relationship

    Like

    • Random Guy says:

      There’s a difference between being funny and having a good personality.

      Some real jack asses have been some of the funniest people I’ve known.

      Hell; learning to be funny might be something that people with bad personalities need.

      Jerkboy’s with a good sense of humor get laid a lot; people who are just straight up jerks don’t.

      Like

  36. cortesar says:

    #whitegenocide Propaganda starting in Kiev, #Ukraine pic.twitter.com/F284NgmnZI

    — Doema Fadir (@Doemafadir) March 23, 2017

    Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      #BoycottCuraprox

      Like

    • Corvo says:

      I don’t know whether that advertisement was meant to have a headless nigger, or whether some based Ukrainian cut its head off; if the latter, the spirit is commendable but next time some better anti-propaganda is in order.

      Or better yet, just remove the whole damned advertisement.

      Anyone else remember the (((outrage))) a few years ago when Sony introduced a white-colored version of its PlayStation Portable gaming device, and ran an ad campaign that had a negress and a White woman in various confrontational poses? Sony had to issue an apology because blacks were offended that, in at least one of the ads, the White character apppeared dominant over the negress.

      I suspect we won’t be hearing nigs complaining about propaganda such as the Ukrainian example.

      Like

    • stevetirone says:

      Oh, this is harsh. Think about it. The typical person who’s going to shove their face through the hole and get their picture taken is going to be white. The product is a face cleanser.

      Now do you get the point of this campaign?

      Like

      • Corvo says:

        Damn – that’s idiotic, who the hell is gonna put their face in there? Not to mention the cut-out is weirdly shaped (side profile? who has a chin like that — Moonman?) and looks to be about waist-high.

        I had never heard of this company so I just went to their website … jesus fucking christ; I’m not gonna spread this garbage here but it gets worse.

        They’re in Switzerland as far as I can tell, but in addition to outright miscegenation propaganda they’re even running with MLK canonization . . .

        Fucking ovens.

        Like

  37. Corvo says:

    Pat Buchanan on fire:

    http://www.vdare.com/articles/the-obama-plot-to-sabotage-trump

    “For what benign purpose would U.S. intelligence agents spread secrets damaging to their own president–to foreign regimes? Is this not disloyalty? Is this not sedition? . . . The Obamaites seeded the U.S. and allied intel communities with IEDs to be detonated on Trump’s arrival. This is the scandal, not Trump telling Vlad to go find Hillary’s 30,000 missing emails. . . .we need to unearth the Deep State conspiracy to sabotage a presidency . . . .

    As for the reports of Lynch-White House involvement in this unfolding plot to damage and destroy Trump the real question is: What did Barack Obama know, and when did he know it?”

    Like

  38. UKIP says:

    The kindest girls I’ve found come in that Mother Hen variety normally around a 4, 5 or 6. Hotties aren’t a bitch but there is a tendency towards vapid shell and a large gulf between their personality and your own..

    Like

  39. Jolly Jaded Jurist says:

    The life of a within-1-standard-deviation-from-the-median-attractiveness woman:

    Sees woman less hot than she: “At least I’m not that bad!”

    Sees woman hotter than she: “What a shallow bitch!”

    On the one hand, unmerited pride; on the other, sour grapes.

    Notice both use negativity to engender a sense of self-worth.

    Bitchiness: a bitter well springing forth bitter waters. End of story.

    Liked by 1 person

  40. Lichthof says:

    I usually find the 8s+ like really masculine men – strong features and hair everywhere, head, face, chest, legs and even back.
    Age is irrelevant. They want to be ravaged by them like a dog.

    25 year olds in my work openly display in their cubes current pictures of Chris Cornell & Steve Tyler.

    Like

    • Chris Cornell is a beautiful beautiful man, but wtf @ Steven Tyler. Proof that high status overcomes all deficiency.

      Like

    • bolg says:

      tyler is an ugly fuck but he owns it. cornell is one of the most talented songwriters in the last 30 years. it almost makes up for him being half-kosher.

      btw, black hole sun was quite prophetic. getting nearer.

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      “the 8s+ like really masculine men… hair everywhere, head, face, chest, legs and even back”

      (Sum(E) == Sum(T)) ?

      Liked by 1 person

    • vfm#7634 says:

      Age is irrelevant.

      Evopsych/The Wall actually disincentivizes HBs from demanding men their own age, because their natural mates are alphas, and alphas stay attractive much longer than betas. So age parity works fine for beta/plain jane couples, but an HB would be submitting herself to a very high risk of her “age-appropriate” alpha cheating and dumping her.

      Like

  41. BK says:

    CH – to file under declining T, young mens hand strength is less than their fathers
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/08/15/todays-men-are-nowhere-near-as-strong-as-their-dads-were-researchers

    Like

  42. gunslingergregi says:

    oh shit some of us in a new movie the new ghost busters rofl
    it wasn’t that bad

    Like

  43. wolfie65 says:

    nOT:

    Like

  44. wolfie65 says:

    nOT:
    Just found real (raw) milk in the ever-ongoing search for a healthier, more natural life.
    You might want to do the same and wean yourselves off the supermarket crap.

    Like

  45. Jim says:

    I have witnessed the truth of this post in action: My ex-girlfriend’s sister “went through a phase” and shaved her head, stopped wearing makeup. Turned into a total cunt. She stopped though, after a grocery store cashier called her “sir.” Grew her hair out, started dressing like a girl again… soon after she had a boyfriend, was getting laid on a regular basis, and suddenly all of her “depression” disappeared and she was an absolute sweetheart. This shit is real.

    Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      She stopped though, after a grocery store cashier called her “sir.”

      Who says fat-shaming or its other close relatives (dyke-shaming?) don’t work?

      Sort of like how the Dunham Horror downgraded/downsized herself to the Dunham Cunt after Trump’s election.

      Liked by 1 person

  46. Lichthof says:

    Holy smoke ..could be pedo victims..could be illegals.. 501 missing girls from DC in 3 months is significant

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/03/24/lawmakers-call-on-fbi-to-help-find-string-missing-black-girls-in-washington.html

    Like

    • Anonymous says:

      I wonder if this was an issue prior to this year, or something new? I’m guessing it’s pretty much BAU, but now that Trump is in office, it’s a national crisis.

      Haven’t I been saying all along that pedo crimes and child abuse is far more prevalent in the ghetto and among third worlders?

      Wonder if they’ll find a way to blame priests and/or the Russians. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Comment got et, dammit.

      Aw, hell, forgot to fill in the e-mail and name after rebooting.

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Let’s try this again.

      I wonder if this number is a significant jump or something that’s been going on for years, but under the Obama regime there were other fish to fry… but now that Trump’s prez, let’s make it a big news story?

      I’ve been saying all along that pedo crimes and child abuse are far more prevalent in the ghetto and third-world communities.

      Let’s see if they can pin this one on priests and/or the Russians. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Like

  47. Corvo says:

    Ann Coulter, God bless her, is fashing out:

    http://www.vdare.com/articles/ann-coulter-full-on-crazy-the-left-wants-everyone-in-the-world-to-have-the-right-to-move-to-america

    “Can the liberals doing cartwheels over a district judge‘s announcement that everyone in the world has a right to come here (except Europeans and Christians), give us the cost-benefit analysis they’re using? Twenty million Third World immigrants give us ( __ ) terrorists, ( __ ) welfare recipients, ( __ ) uncompensated medical costs, ( __ ) discrimination lawsuits, but it’s all worth it because ( _________________ )?”

    Like

  48. Anonymous says:

    Hey JOHN MOSBY, stick this up your ass you lying piece of shit.

    Btw,
    1. you have no game
    2. You are an overweight sports fanboy
    3. You would wilt like a daisy in real life.

    As for Greg and his neocon brethren who keep pushing your bullshit theories while I continue to be proven right.

    Like

  49. Anonymous says:

    Like

  50. Teal Thyme says:

    There have been less than 150 deaths due to terrorism in the US in the last 15 years. and I include all terror groups not just Islamic groups, on which you seem fixated. In just the last 5 years there have been over 1500 mass shootings in the US with a far, far larger death toll. So which is the larger existential threat to the US?

    [CH: you’re not telling us anything new when you tacitly cite nagger criminal violence as evidence that the US has problems. still, when in a hole, stop digging. america doesn’t need muslims. they commit terror attacks at 5,000% the rate of non-muslims in america. they have their own countries. they don’t need this one too.]

    Like

    • Corvo says:

      Fuck off kike.

      Shitty brown people killed more than 1500 on a single day in 2001. Shitty brown people gangbang slaying each other account for most of your bogus “1500 mass shooting” deaths. Shitty brown people are the problem, the kebab version simply a particularly virulent strain of it.

      Like

    • Teal Thyme says:

      meanwhile western bombs kill thousand every day and no one cares. what goes around comes around.

      Like

      • Corvo says:

        lol fastest mask-slippage in CH history

        [CH: heh. that’s my real talent, applying the shiv with just enough pinpoint pressure to get the snakes to crawl out of the grass.]

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        You’re bitching at the wrong people. Take that phenomenon up with Juan McAmnesty.

        Oh, I forgot: Juan McAmnesty is the Democrat’s favorite Republican.

        Like

      • Vanamee says:

        we do need to get the f out of the ME. blowback. then slam the door and triple bolt it. (after we kick out the uninvited guests and guests who overstayed their welcome, ofc.)

        Like

      • Oleaginous Outrager says:

        None of those bombs land in Saudi Arabia, yet they’re the biggest sponsor of terrorism on Earth.

        “last 15 years”. Real convenient for your mendacious “stats” that 2001 falls just outside that time period.

        Like

    • oink says:

      There have been less than 150 deaths due to terrorism in the US in the last 15 years

      but more than 2000 in the last 20

      Like

      • oink says:

        50 dead in Pulse shooting alone. 15 in “Bonnie and Clyde do the jihad”, at least 10 police shot in terrorist attacks last year. 5 dead in the Juan-does-jihad incident. Than the cracker that killed 9 negroes. Then the idiot that shot the reporter and her cameraman on live TV.

        So 90+ in the last 16 months.

        were there less than 60 in the previous 164 months? The Batman Movie Shooting, SandyHook, and the campus shootings

        Like

    • Random Guy says:

      How about factoring in all the attempted terrorist attacks and how much the death toll would be if they had gotten off the ground?

      Like

    • Reb says:

      Muzzies hate naggers but naggers seem to think muzzies are cool.

      Like

  51. Vanamee says:

    uh oh mr hearts looks like divine sons sister figured u out ooh

    Mayim Bialik: Stop calling women “girls”: https://t.co/y2KrKocsq8 pic.twitter.com/qvefmi8vjO

    — RELEVANT (@RELEVANT) March 24, 2017

    [CH: that girl is so (((ugly))).]

    Like

  52. Robert What? says:

    As mentioned in another thread, when the patriarchy ruled even a homely woman could dream of home, family and love if she was kind, pleasant and skilled in the domestic arts. However today those attributes are now considered signs of “oppression” and “subservience” so most young women disdain to achieve them. As a result the homely woman has nothing left to bring to the table.

    Liked by 3 people

    • true. even the prettiest of girls knew they would eventually lose their looks so they would make an effort to master other skills that would make them appealing to men later on.

      now none of them do that. not even the ugly ones. and the few girls who do end up with daughters aren’t teaching them to do it either.

      Like

  53. Oleaginous Outrager says:

    Solid bet: many attractive girls with bitchy personalities are dykes who just haven’t given themselves the prerequisite “don’t come near me male scum!” buzzcut yet.

    Like

  54. […] used graphically or in a chart to illustrate a concept or theory, it becomes completely opaque. Here’s a beauty which attempts to show the correlation between a woman’s looks and the likelihood of her being […]

    Like

  55. Zeta says:

    thank you, this builds clarity

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion