This was a Redditor’s dream for womanhood. So now we know: nerds want hot women to read predigested left wing university-approved sjw crap so they’ll turn into flat-chested tubular hapas that the nerds think they have a shot with, and ugly feminists want hot women to read so they’ll become less feminine and stop taunting the feminists with their outrageous femininity. Interestingly, both nerds and feminists are laboring under the misogynistic premise that hot chicks don’t read.
And that book she’s reading? “BANG WELLESLEY”
***
Hugh Jenniks quips,
looks like Ivanka picking up the Talmud and turning into Jared.
Why is the hot woman so brown? Couldn’t they make her normal looking, instead of diverse?
LikeLike
The slope of the BMI over time is going the wrong way.
LikeLike
I think the aim was to give hot girl a tan, as in, she’s been outside, hanging by the pool, showing off her string bikini.
Now that she’s “reading”, she stays indoors, never sees the sun and turns ghost pale.
(Or since they made her look all stripper like, she’s probably got a spray on tan to collect more dollar-dollar bills)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not really all that much O/T, but Vitamin D deficiency can really screw you up – for instance, it correlates pretty strongly with depression [as does living in a poorly lit house, as do the long dark nights of Winter].
LikeLiked by 2 people
Vitamin D is also necessary for healthy testosterone levels.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s why I make sure to give my wife a serious dosage of the D, day after day.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Aaron Hernandez: “Guard, I’d like some more bedsheets please.”
Prison Guard; “Yeah, okay Aaron. How much do you want?”
Aaron Hernandez; “A lifetime supply.”
LikeLike
My thought exactly. “Sexy” is a brown lady. As she gets more inwardly converged and outwardly frumpy she gets visibly whiter. Another bit of propaganda.
LikeLike
She looks like a street walker. Apparently I want the girl who picks up books but doesn’t open them.
LikeLiked by 3 people
@everybodyhatesscott
“Apparently I want the girl who picks up books but doesn’t open them.”
……
That’s a tough one. I don’t like them cleaning up after me too much because
“I remember where I left things so that’s where I look for them when I need them. And I left the book open at that page for a reason. Ffs. No,it’s okay. Just…go make me a sammich.”
LikeLike
It’s just a sweet tan
LikeLike
The message I drew from this infographic was that as people increase their reading they tend to become white people and then asian
LikeLiked by 1 person
As if g00ks read literature.
Their poetry consists of seeing who can draw the calligraphy the most spergtastically.
LikeLike
The newly ripe cherries scatter like coins of elm seeds.
It is also April in Yangzhou.
Last night red orchids in the thatched hut burst into blossom
Worrying about the wind and rain [that might ruin the blossoms], unable to sleep.
– Huang Shen (1687–1768)
LikeLike
That’s like “Ode on a Grecian Urn” for a g00k. Unable to sleep. Worried about the orchid blossoms.
LikeLike
They used to. I am reading the Hagakure right now. It is pretty fascinating.
LikeLike
The above cartoon could also be interpreted as what every guy (nerd or not) WANTS (left) vs. what every guy (possibly even a few nerds) actually meets (right).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reading cost her all her curves.
Nerds want girls who look like and dress like guys, complete with manbuns.
LikeLike
Sorry if this is OT:
I know that this will likely fall on deaf ears, but I feel compelled to make this appeal anyway: There has been an increasing amount of acrimony in the comments of late, as various commenters have escalated long-running feuds. These internet squabbles are destined to go nowhere.
It’s a shame. I mean, aside from one or two obvious trolls and random snarky drive-bys, all of us here have open eyes, have the same mindset, and certainly we share the same enemies. We have a common purpose. But to squander energy sniping and insulting each other, incessantly hurling accusations of “sock-puppet” and crypto-joo is as uncouth as it is unproductive. I don’t mean to launch into a plaintive “why can’t we all just get along” lament, but is it so difficult to refrain from the petty and spiteful banter and train our fire on our actual opponents? The very fate of Western Civilization is at stake, and many of us shall suffer greatly if it falls. I know there will always be simmering disagreements in approach, or as to the extent of the influence of YKW, or about how awesome Trump is currently being, but aside from acknowledging those disagreements can we move on? We all know what Ben Franklin said during the Revolution.
I just wish there was more of a sense of brotherhood in this venue, even though the scorched earth back-and-forth can be quite entertaining. We all probably can bring something to the table, and thus deserve more respect than ridicule.
Except for Greg Eliot. Sorry, Greg, but you kind of have to admit, you bring it on yourself!
[CH: i agree, and unfortunately the acrimony of late has had me questioning the “food fight” policy of this blog. there’s a bifurcation in comment quality at CH: a lot of dreck and a lot of outstanding comments. i’m also starting to wonder if derp state operatives are seeding this blog with sockpuppets and various violence-inciting trolls to turn it into a honeypot.]
LikeLiked by 8 people
Be more subtle why don’t you.
LikeLike
Except for Greg Eliot. Sorry, Greg, but you kind of have to admit, you bring it on yourself!
You sound like the reaching-for-vapors alleged friends of Heritage America that try to shame Trump for tweeting back at those who try to snark him.
Nice try, but just because I don’t suffer fools gladly, and give back twice as good as I get, don’t give me that “bring it on myself” bullshit.
Any objective observer will see that my combative nature arises under two circumstances:
a) someone is an obvious shill who tries to run the same jive by the chateau that’s already been gainsaid dozens and dozens of times… ESPECIALLY when done by obvious sock-puppies (which CH has called out himself on many occasions) who are trying to bolster their weak offense.
b) someone pops out of the woodwork (again, invariably an obvious sock-puppy) to single me out with some personal snark.
Part of winning the war on our hands, before the shooting starts, is to not take the same ol’ Cyberian antiWhite bullshit that our enemies have been controlling the narrative with, until very recently.
And if you’re not willing to admit that at least my barbs and insults are a lot better and wittier than the South Park puerile homoerotic projection snark of our enemies, then you’re just as disingenuous a clown as they.
And on the brotherhood issue, I believe that, again, a truly objective observer will admit that I give out my share of kudos to the honest and reliable men of the chateau at a healthy pace, and cover their six whenever necessary… and which is why three or four of them often come to my defense.
So spare me… indeed, spare the entire chateau… this hand-wringing.
And don’t fret over “wasting energy”… most of us are multifaceted, multitasking, and have plenty of energy to spare.
You fairy.
LikeLike
I’m with Greg. A guy writes a long spiel and then -with the last sentence- takes back everything he says.
“We should all get along, hold hands, live in harmony, peace, love and grace, blah blah blah but fuck THIS guy, he deserves to be slapped”
Whatever. He just negated everything he said before.
LikeLike
jonesy, I owe you for that honesty, though we’ve knocked haids before.
An fair appraisal from an enemy is often more telling than compliments from friends.
LikeLike
“I just wish there was more of a sense of brotherhood in this venue”
He says that, ^look up^, and then he effectively says “Fuck Greg Eliot”.
what a fag.
LikeLike
I think you guys took the “Greg” line a little too seriously.
LikeLike
See, I know I should have added the smiley face!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you guys took the “Greg” line a little too seriously.
Easy for you to say.
See, I know I should have added the smiley face!
Now, now… no backpedaling. Its intent was obvious (a la, “Sorry, but”).
But that’s okay, my back’s broad enough for the bearing… and I had my say…
… as did a few others.
LikeLike
“my combative nature arises under two circumstances:”
thanks for clarifying your intentions, Greg. we were all on pins in needles, afraid you might just get mad and leave us.
another word of advice, Herr Greg: never defend yourself or apologize, unless it’s absolutely necessary. (no, it wasn’t necessary). it reeks of Sally Field’s “you LIKE me! you REALLY like me!”
a second word of advice: if/when an explanation is appropriate keep it short. this isn’t a lifetime channel daytime soap opera. a simple grunt among men is far more entertaining AND demonstrative of high status than your literal, bullet point, play-by-play, gotta-get-the-last-word-in, omega verbal menstruating.
you’re welcome.
LikeLike
if/when an explanation is appropriate keep it short. this isn’t a lifetime channel daytime soap opera. a simple grunt among men is far more entertaining AND demonstrative of high status than your literal, bullet point, play-by-play, gotta-get-the-last-word-in, omega verbal menstruating.
I see it’s time yet again to play
CAN… YOU… SPOT… THE… IRONY!
(((raucous applause from the studio audience)))
LikeLike
I’ve never heard of you before.
LikeLike
He’s me. I am him. I am CH. It’s all a conspiracy.
I am you. You are me. I am EVERYWHERE.
kek
just kidding, Les Saunders. I have no idea who this “meistergedanken” guy.
LikeLike
He’s been at the chateau a few times, and his comments are usually pretty good, if memory serves.
This latest hand-wringing one, though… not up to usual standards.
And the fact that he had to bring my name into it, well… never passes the smell test, given that there are several others here far less couth, far more irascible, and, on the other side, interminable prevaricators, instigators, and all-around pusillanimous dastards.
LikeLike
We all probably can bring something to the table, and thus deserve more respect than ridicule.
On a side note, because I’m sure we’re all curious, who are these posters that deserve more respect than the ridicule they get?
Last I checked, the only ones taking big heat pretty much deserve it, for their obvious Synathedral shilling, inane multiple personae trolling, and/or Jekyll & Hyde attempts to play both sides of any given issue on any given thread.
LikeLike
i’m also starting to wonder if derp state operatives are seeding this blog with sockpuppets and various violence-inciting trolls to turn it into a honeypot.
More than one of us here have had the same concern, and voiced as much.
But then, don’t those tactics DESERVE acrimony and blowback?
Can’t have it both ways…
If you want genteel demeanor and respectful discourse, you can’t let the dweebs hang around…
And if you let them hang around, you can’t complain about the rough and tumble when they haids get knocked.
LikeLike
in find most of the “fighting” in here almost friendly in nature. if you have thin skin it’s your problem. plus the hasbara plants deserve calling out.
almost agreed with the “we should get along” message until the jab at Greg.
shalom, fellow alt-right person.
LikeLike
Thank you, brother-man.
LikeLike
welcome, Greg.
LikeLike
Meister, I agree 100% and applaud you for being a prophet.
LikeLike
Now if you can just get dweebstreep or Anon2 on board, the issue’s settled.
LikeLike
” We all probably can bring something to the table, and thus deserve more respect than ridicule. ”
Yes, we are all special little snowflakes. Unique , and no matter how idiotic and siily it is, it should be heard and embraced lest you hurt their feels.
Take that SJW babble somewhere else, please.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 2 people
lol
LikeLike
+10
LikeLike
People’s politics are pretty much whatever helps their sexual status.
if their sexual status is so low, the ideology necessarily gets more and more impossible to implement successfully.
LikeLike
Brilliant
LikeLike
Comments at Vox are often better quality now because of the constant sniping here. I don’t like it generally as I think it also scares off younger men who are afraid of having their naivite shoved down their throats and the brighter men like Giovanni Donato and some of the others who lurk here, I think are also driven away. I generally skim past the food fight threads. Even some of the trolls can have a good point or two. And once they are pointed out, constant repetition can be tedious.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vox’s blog is a… blog. the chateau is a living entity with a soul. it attracts a special kind of people. only the mentally strong survive here. it is the place to be.
LikeLike
Second best COTW, right after Hugh Jenniks’
LikeLike
Also true, but we still chase off a lot of good thinkers.
LikeLike
everyone gets a fair shot. even the jewfag. that’s a lot
LikeLike
Once you make this comment you have to name. Who are the violence inciting? Who post the dreck? Who are the outstanding ones? Who brings acrimony to this realms?
LikeLike
[We all know what Ben Franklin said during the Revolution.]
That is true; but you should remember two things about Franklin:
1. He was himself a very acrimonious man among extremely acrimonious men who all came to be known as our Founding Fathers.
2. He also wrote an essay entitled “Fart Proudly”.
But I don’t think it’s fair for you to single out Greg Eliot in such an open ended manner without specifying exactly what it is that you object to regarding him. Do you object to him “personally” – to his mere presence here (and if so why) – or to what he says (or said) and if so, when; do you object to HOW he says it or to WHOM he says it to?
You have to be clear so that he can either defend (or amend himself) if he so chooses. As it stands, you give him opportunity for neither.
I appreciate your general sentiments – I even agree with much of it; but it’s too “shitlibby” to just sucker punch and run over a situation that obviously moves you enough to get up and declaim seriously upon.
LikeLike
Fuck off, faggot. Who the fuck are you?
LikeLike
Also: the hatred of aryan blonde hair
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apparently the message is that nerds and feminists secretly want (or want to be) K-selected, honest advertising (no heels, bleach-blonde hair, or spray-tan), and chastely dressed.
My preference is second from right.
LikeLike
I like the second from the left. Mainly for the pose.
LikeLike
Second to the left or to the right depending on the day, really. Second from the left looks high-maintenance, but could probably knock you unconscious from the intensity in bed.
LikeLike
“high-maintenance, but could probably knock you unconscious from the intensity in bed”
Borderline Personality Disorder says “Hi!”.
LikeLike
Yes, second from right is the peak of that lineup. Still not quite modestly dressed enough, but sufficiently to pass muster, and still feminine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, if it were up to me it’d be Belle Époque dress all day every day.
Take a moment to reflect on what is lost.
View post on imgur.com
LikeLiked by 7 people
I don’t like any of them: too much cloth.
LikeLike
It’s tough in a hot climate
LikeLike
Middle and 2nd from the left. Right girl is overslutted on purpose. Im quite surprised they didn’t throw in some confederate flag bikini on her. The left = totally repulsive leftist dream of whytewymyn. It would be spergy, but tossing up a poll would show some nice biomechanics data.
LikeLike
Oh shi1t I messed up there with left/right, but you get the idea.
LikeLike
She looks increasingly unhappy from left to right.
LikeLike
HERETIC!!!!!
LikeLike
[…] What Nerds And Feminists Secretly Want […]
LikeLike
They left out the final stage in the evolution: moldylocks.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Is there any song that better satirizes the beta bux-alpha fux phenomenon?
LikeLiked by 1 person
looks like Ivanka picking up the Talmud and turning into Jared.
LikeLiked by 6 people
haha…
LikeLike
Winner
LikeLike
Thread over.
Well-played, sir… well-played, indeed.
LikeLike
It was a black dress, but just the same:
https://i.redditmedia.com/Lj57RoGFg-ebWXNUZnjY6kXGCw83oawdI8WeB850yEo.jpg?w=320&s=50a9428c913605e4f838fd354bf8c122
LikeLike
Hugh Jenniks pwns teh innert00bs for Friday, April 21, 2017.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very excited to see new partnerships developing in support of apprenticeships in #STEM fields! https://t.co/yzXYDV8wOx
— Ivanka Trump (@IvankaTrump) April 19, 2017
“In case you missed it, Howard University and Google recently announced that they were partnering to attract more African American students to study computer science, targeting a segment of the tech population that is notoriously underrepresented (along with women).”
==========================================================
lozzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I have heard they are going to develop a special African version of Java script written in Ebonics
So you coder slaves of commifornia be prepared to work more for less shekels
cause Oyvanka be very excited
LikeLike
EbonicScript
//loops
shit be trippin’ till it be broke
//conditionals
if tyrone get my hoe, hell naw
//boolean for TRUE
nowhatimsayin’
LikeLike
Fuck this traitorous bitch. Turned her back on Christ, now turning her back on her (now it seems to be former) people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I prefer the girl right in the middle, but I can at least plausibly see why far left girl appeals to some. Who the fuck wants far right girl?
LikeLike
Natural B-cups look better than huge obviously fake tits.
LikeLike
Well, let’s not go crazy now. 😉
LikeLike
Masectomy scars look better than huge obviously fake tits.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Now that’s pushing it.
LikeLike
Hyperbole in defense of natural breasts is no vice!
[CH: some wise words from this blog about fake tits:
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2007/09/21/fake-tits/
tl;dr: yuck.]
LikeLike
Hyperbole in defense of natural breasts is no vice!
I see what you did there.
/Goldwater rape!
I just didn’t like that B-cups or huge fake tits were the only two choices. kek
LikeLiked by 1 person
You need D’s to get the D.
LikeLike
At least far right girl is not a blue (haired) whale. Plus, she can’t be wrong if she’s… far right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
*in my best John Mcglaughlin voice*. “Thursday has the correct answer. Well done, Thursday.”
LikeLike
It’s an arabic book–probably muzzie related (Koran?)–which is why it’s drawn as it is–their writing is from right-to-left.
What we would consider the back cover, is actually the front cover.
LikeLike
From left to right: ons, gf, mother of my children, cashier I say “hi” to occasionally, person I use to illustrate dangers of feminism to my daughters
LikeLiked by 1 person
“mother of my children”
HTF did that get past the f!lter?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Didn’t have the word “m4rriage”
LikeLike
Notice how reading the book not only causes the bimbo’s bosom to deflate, it also kills her joy and wipes her smile.
That book is the fruit of the poisoned tree… wisdom and knowledge of good and evil…
LikeLike
“…reading the book not only causes the bimbo’s bosom to deflate, it also kills her joy and wipes her smile….”
well, paulo coelho will do that to you
LikeLike
so a woman who is not a sjw is a floosy stripper? talk about reframing. it’s not only misandry but misogyny to spin feminine women as being silicone injected, platinum blonde, sluts.
LikeLike
I tend to agree, but in this case, I’d give it a pass under the heading “Hyperbole For Demonstrative Effect”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fucked a stripper that read books a week. Invalidated
LikeLike
Its hard to call most college educated women smart since they are also more likely to vote left compared to educated/less educated men and less educated women. In other words – going through the education system did not make them smarter – they are actually destroying their own societies via their idiotic pro-immigration positions.
LikeLike
Yup .
And the commies kill the intellectuals after their useful idiocy is no longer needed
Funny how that works out, eh ?
LikeLike
I’d be happy with any of the 3 in the middle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘so they’ll turn into flat-chested tubular hapas’
That’s very observant how she begins as a white woman with a tan into an androgynous asian.
That’s pretty much the end goal. Merge females and males into a nerdy hive minded subservient shims.
LikeLike
“That’s pretty much the end goal.”
Indeed.
LikeLike
There’s also the matter of the premise being inherently condescending and naïve. Far right chica is just as likely as not to be far left chica on Saturday night.
You’ll also notice only the far left is an extreme; the progression to Xena the SJW princess is curiously omitted.
LikeLike
Can’t believe she didn’t turn into a Hidden Fences negress at the end. Or a shemale.
LikeLike
https://www.buzzfeed.com/krishrach/this-sexist-cartoon-everyone-is-freaking-out-about-is-actual?utm_term=.gtAVA76k8P#.ekLkyDvgoZ
this post is ironically a good ch re-frame. the original piece is just niche ‘animated character transformation’ porn (wtf) created for some weirdo who apparently wanted to see the reverse transformation of whatever the niche trend is. wasn’t any sort of statement but feminazis got offended because of typical ‘muh desexualization’ bullshit. maybe ch picked it up from somewhere after it had been run through a few misinterpretations.
that said there’s plenty of legit ammo out there to support the implications of this post.
LikeLike
usually involves “hyper-feminine, hyper-sexualized caricature.”
Yawn… been there, got the T-shirt.
Anyone remember Little Annie Fanny?
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes
LikeLike
Feminists, sure.
Nerds, not so sure. Their dream is more along the lines of The Producers — a hot chick who falls for them makes a move on them for inexplicable reasons.
Unless they have latent homosexual tendencies (read: hipsters, male feminists, etc.) — then I suppose they’d be into androgynes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Please Maitre, don’t go Pleasureman on us!
I promise to lighten my trolling of that God-Damned BND plant!
LikeLike
I can’t get my dick hard for the one on the far right. No problems for the other four.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 2 people
haha!
LikeLike
Moar Jessica Rabbit plz.
LikeLike
She’s not a bad girl… she’s just drawn that way.
LikeLiked by 2 people
here
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 3 people
“BANG WELLESLEY” he he mr hearts should jockey for a cut of the royalties
LikeLike
I can’t understand why anyone should find high heels attractive or “sexy”.
LikeLike
Gives the illusion that the legs are longer than they are, and causes the butt to stick out a bit more.
LikeLike
That comment makes you gayer than a thousand Liberaces.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I can’t understand why anyone should find high heels attractive or “sexy
Completely agreed. When I see a woman in high heels I think of her as a caricature and not a real person.
LikeLike
If you work under the assumption the last chick is Asian, that’s not exactly a secret for what nerds want.
What’s funny is this acts like what the goals or desires of “society” I would have to imagine are for their women to all be strippers.
If anything that’s a liberal end game closer in line with what the last woman in that image would want.
Your conservative types, society in general want good wives. Which would be the second from the end or the one in the middle.
Though it’s interesting that the one whose supposed to be the exact opposite of the stripper chick is running around in leggings and just a shade from being half naked as compared to every other woman post-stripper in that line.
LikeLike
If you work under the assumption the last chick is Asian, that’s not exactly a secret for what nerds want.
I think it’s more of a case of “beggars can’t be choosers”. Asians, having been dependent on soy for thousands of years, have evolved in such a way that their women will be able to respond to meek, passive men like nerds, even if they don’t necessarily prefer them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I met a Korean lady at a Trump rally and like all of us…she was very concerned with where this country is going.
Certain Asians are intelligent, organized, conservative…traditional.
They have very little in common with white shitlibs and are dismayed at their antics.
I wonder will it get to a point that they will leave if things really start going down the toilet?
LikeLike
One of my co-workers is a Thai lady who told me not to long after Trump had announced he was running that she liked him because of what he was saying and what he wanted to do.
While few and far between, there are those like her that want to come to be in America and soak up American and try to assimilate. Which in certain ways, you can tell, especially with her kids.
She had thrown out the mild rhetorical question after saying she liked him “is that wrong?” and I told her no, but to not say much to anyone else, otherwise she’d hear and earful and would probably be dissuaded.
LikeLike
Yep, little contingent of “Asians for Trump” at the rally I attended. Just Maybe those Koreans who stood on the rooftops during the LA riots picking off the Trayvons down below will still be around in the next big scuffle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am nerdish and have a strong preference for the woman on the left. I feel any culture that has an abundance of sexy women such as Eastern Europe is superior to ours.
LikeLike
Is the cartoon graphic a depiction of some sort of Darwinian Evolution from a fake-blond negress to a jewess nerd?
LikeLike
Feminism wants to ugly down hot chicks because as an elderly woman once told me “Women HATE every other woman who has something they do not”
Clearly the femi-uglies hate hote women for this reason.
Nerds on the other hand are more tricky. They have a dick, as small as he may be, and this dick wants to bang the blonde sex-bomb on the left.
Now reality kicks in and they realize only the bricks and ducebags and rich assholes bang such chicks, certainly not them.
So. He thinks. What i can get is 3s, 4s and maybe a 5 on a lucky strike day. To max out my chances lets ugly them down to make the pool of lowSMV females bigger. Lets fat them up. Let them cut their hair. Make fashion for gays. The more the better. When all womenz are 3-5 we have more choice!
LikeLike
I suspect it depends upon the nerd’s political orientation.
Those on the left, including (((nerds))), will promote female uglification.
Those on the right — or alt-right — learn Game.
LikeLike