Certain combinations of speech are optimally attractive to women. Wit, conversational fluidity, and terseness are common elements in the kind of wordplay that women most adore in men. On that subject, reader Sorcerygod explores the confluence of body language with, well, actual language.
The body language IS worth taking a closer look at, but it would be even more interesting to hear the tone of his voice and the contents of his words.
Considering that Stratham is a grunting jock figure, he probably doesn’t match his voice with his stance.
Now *I* have a good voice. Low, deep, slow, amused, intelligent, full of witty remarks . . . And I’ve been told more than once I’m a “good talker.” Supposedly words don’t matter, it’s just the auditory qualities of the voice, and the body stance, but I believe that offering skilled talk, and interesting dialogue, is CRUCIAL to seduction, and a man who can speak well and fluidly on many different topics can compensate for his poor looks . . . now when you combine looks and talk like me, you’ve got a veritable divine figure —
If I can offer a few tips.
One, start off using small words. The brain, especially the female brain, latches onto these first. These are your foundation.
Two, to show your intelligence sprinkle higher words like “epitome of something,” “nascent value,” “reductionism” . . . as long as you have a base of low level words, it doesn’t matter if she doesn’t understand all of them, you will convey that you are erudite and sharp-minded. And she *WILL* subconsciously get the meaning of at least some from context. And she will drip drip drip.
So a sample monologue of Sorcerygod talk would go something like this:
“I love the new spring weather, it’s so refreshing and rejuvenating. The wind, the air, the flowers, the strangers on the street with smiles on their faces. But are any of them sad to the point of suicide? Sometimes I catch a glimpse on their faces . . .”
Mostly simple, basic words, jacked up with point-forward braininess.
That’s the way you want to go. Practice. Oh, and being able to write well translates directly into being able to speak well. So if you’re alone, you can still practice communicating by writing, and then transfer this later to spoken dialogue with others.
Absolutely. Many SMRT men make the mistake of ladling their verbal IQ all over women, imagining that women are aroused by their linguistic prestidigitation. NO. Women are aroused by dominant men, ZFG men, clever men, impudent men…. of whom advanced verbal fluency is as much a distraction from, as an amplification of, their attractiveness to women.
The ideal verbal approach is to coax an accelerated camaraderie with the use of “power words” — which are usually mono- or bisyllabic — that girls promptly jack into via emotional pathways that electrify fastest when lubed by simpler, stronger words than by nuanced Oxfordian words stuffed with exquisite connotations. This will be your conversational base, over which you will furnish the occasional five-dollar words and ambiguous subtext, because no pickup attempt went to the bedroom without first rubbing her rationalization hamster against the grain.
In succinctness, the best verbal DHVs are those which pleasantly surprise. If you showcase your linguistic prowess like a flesh-bound thesaurus, girls will think you’re a try-hard, or too nerdy to suffer gladly. But toss out a morsel of brain-waking blingo atop an entree of jerkboy-banter, and just when a girl thinks she’s got a handle on you her assumptions are destroyed and her vagina begins flowering anew.
It’s a similar concept to insulting SJWs. If you assault an SJW with a barrage of insults right out of the gate, no matter how creative or on-the-mark, xir will turtle and shut off to any more input from you. To really excavate the SJW soul and maneuver your shiv close to xir’s id for the killing twist, you’ve got to soften your initial salvos and pretend to polite discussion. Then, when complacence has lowered the SJW’s blubber-bunkered guard, and xim thinks you may be a reasonable sort, you place one hand on the end of your shiv and drive it to the hilt into xie’s now-exposed heartmatter.
This does require some amount of time investment, though, for a nonetheless delectable payoff, so there’s nothing wrong with taking the easy route and nuking the SJW from orbit. You won’t change xit’s mind but you will trigger xox’s amygdala.
Sorcerygod sounds lame and boring. Statham has a scratchy cockneyish voice and rarely says enough to show his level of intelligence, beyond Street tough commonsense.
Brevity is your friend and women can smell a lower from a mile off.
LikeLike
“Brevity is the soul of wit”
Yet another maxim by our wiser-than-us forefathers that hits the mark.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rape!
LikeLike
✡✡✡ (((ESKIMO))) BALD NAKED LIES ABOUT THE DONALD ✡✡✡ “The New York Times told us several times that they would make sure that my story that I was telling came across. They promised several times that they would do it accurately. They told me several times and my manager several times that it would not be a hit piece and that my story would come across the way that I was telling it and honestly, and it absolutely was not.” http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3431001/posts
LikeLike
“He never offended me in any way. He was very gracious. I saw him around all types of people, all types of women. He was very kind, thoughtful, generous, you know. He was a gentleman,” Brewer said.
LikeLike
TAKEAWAY: 1) Every word out of an Eskimo’s mouth is a lie, including the words “and” & “the”. 2) The Donald does NOT date ugly chicks.
LikeLike
spergerygod’s shit sounded…gay. I mean WTF?
All this spergy overanalysis on WHAT to say- it DOESN’T MATTER. It’s HOW you say it! You can talk about Doppler broadening on a date and a chick’s pupils will go pie-plate if you do it the right way. They don’t give a fuck, it’s all performance art to them. It either causes an emotional response or it doesn’t.
So I am going for my rescue diver cert in another week and a half. Isn’t ACTUAL sort of 95+ percentile REAL competence in something pretty badass, like…MORE actually badass than trying to imitate it by wordsmithing?
So wtf is your excuse? I have shit to talk about on dates…I might say shit about deep diving and narcosis and partial pressures of oxygen…chicks eat it up, why? Because of the delivery. They probably don’t even know what oxygen is, but shit it SOUNDS interesting.
Do some THINGS that will give you some ACTUAL confidence instead of faking it! Find something vaguely dangerous and/or challenging and invest some time into it.
Focus on what you can do that you’re good at and accentuate it.
LikeLike
Do some THINGS that will give you some ACTUAL confidence instead of faking it! Find something vaguely dangerous and/or challenging and invest some time into it.
Focus on what you can do that you’re good at and accentuate it.
Good advice bears repeating.
LikeLike
Yes, the lower classes can only get so far with Our Women, despite what t.v. advertises.
LikeLike
> “more interesting to hear the tone of his voice… Low, deep, slow…” ——— The sonorousness, the pacing, and the content are key. You’re trying to sound like Mario Lanzo or Elvis or Johnny Cash or some other deep baritone/basso voice. You’re at your own pace because you own yourself and you answer to no one. Hurried speech makes you sound apprehensive or even nervous, and nothing but nothing ruins it for the Hamster like apprehension & nervousness & fear.
LikeLike
As for the content, SEXUALIZE almost immediately, but in a clever, gentlemanly, refined manner. Not in a vulgar or crass or obscene manner. But don’t sound over-eager about the sexualization – her Hamster wants to hear it from a world-wise man in a “been there/done that” tone of voice. And the sexualization must make you sound dominant and her sound submissive. Bring up topics like “naughty girl” and “needs a nice hard spanking” as quickly as possible. But not hurriedly. At your own pace. Because you own yourself.
LikeLike
Because YOU will decide when she gets her spanking. And YOU will decide how hard the spanking will be. And YOU will decide how many 0rgasms she gets afterwards.
LikeLike
I’ve been getting a ton of mileage lately out of Toenail Polish Game [Fingernail Polish Game if she’s wearing shoes], especially with this mainstreaming of the Goth/Jet-Black polishes. Variations on: “Does your Dad know that you painted your toenails black? Did he give you a nice hard spanking? No? Then I guess I’ll hafta do it for him. Gimme your number.” Or: “Are your toenails black?” SHE: “No, they’re dark purple!” YOU: “Well if you came home with black toenails, would your Dad spank you?” etc etc etc… If nothing else, it gets her to talking about how much she hates the Goth-tards.
LikeLike
“I’ve been getting a ton of mileage lately out of Toenail Polish Game…”
Hilarious. Listen, why don’t you show us on YouTube. You know, actually field testing, rather than we assuming you are employing this tactic. Teach us a thing or two about Game. This we HAVE to see…
LikeLike
??? – Not sure if you’re serious. For serious readers: Chicks love Love LOVE it when you notice shizzle like new hairstyles or weird jewelry or some pattern they’ve painted on their fingernails or toenails. Don’t be all fanboy anime-tard over-eager about it – be world wise, but also a little clumsy. Pause, and then say “Did you do something to your hair?” “Who did your nails?” “Okay, what the heck is the symbolism of that thing you’re wearing around your neck?” Nothing gets the ball rolling like the intimacy of talking about her body.
LikeLike
Chicks also LOVE to talk about their competition. YOU: “Did (((insert name of Princess Barbie here))) get some implants, or is she just wearing one of them padded push-up bras?” SHE: “Blah blah blah… rumor about getting trained in the fraternity house… blah blah blah… rumor about an ab0rtion… blah blah blah… definitely cheating on her boyfriend… blah blah blah… got busted at school for smoking weed…” If you just shut up and listen, then you’ll quickly learn all the gossip for roughly the surrounding five counties.
LikeLike
@Cap
for sure. this goes back to the foundations of mystery method.
pretty much any little light comment about her looks is a great opener.
LikeLike
creating dissonance with her looks works really well. a girl tells me the funniest thing I said to her when we met was this:
me: “Can I see your nails? [they were short and unpolished] Oh wow, I’m surprised….”
her: “why???”
me: “well it’s just that girls who are well groomed like you usually also have nice nails.”
her: [cute frown], followed by long-winded explanation about why her nails weren’t done
now every time she gets her nails done she sends me a picture, and we both have a good laugh.
LikeLike
Cappy, sounds like GCM is another JIDF operative. Guess they found a new replacement for (((uh))) as she recovers from her stress leave.
LikeLike
“Oh wow, I’m surprised….” ——— Right. Be a little clumsy & clue-less about it. Like if she changes her hair from jet-black to platinum-blonde, you scrunch up your face in a frown, and pause for a while [hold the pause for as long as possible], and then maybe just start to walk away. SHE: “What, what is it, what’s wrong?” YOU [turning back around]: “Gosh, I dunno. I just felt like something looked different. But I can’t quite put my finger on what it was. Huh. Well, whatever.” And then walk away. [HER HAMSTER: “OMG, HE’S SUCH A JERK!!! I HATE HIS F-ING GUTS!!!!!”]
LikeLike
oh ffs, use the same dumbass lines that 1000 other guys did…sure.
I’m with GCM
LikeLike
> “now every time she gets her nails done she sends me a picture” ——— That’s the Frame you want right there – desperately trying to please her Master…
LikeLike
[…] Your Daily Game: The Seductive Potential Of Little Words […]
LikeLike
I like the idea of using small words that are easy to understand with women.
I have noticed that just patiently being persistent in getting a female’s attention is more work than it used to be. Women are always scatterbrained but these days with so many phone distractions it’s easy to make an approach more complicated than it needs to be.
A woman may want to talk with you but if your first few sentences are confusing to her distracted brain… you will be dismissed.
A steady approach with a calm voice sets the foundation for a good conversation. Before you do any routine or qualifications you have to be able to gain her attention. If you do a routine before having her attention you come off like a boy suffering from Asperger syndrome.
LikeLike
I don’t believe anything captainobvious writes.
LikeLike
“when complacence has lowered the SJW’s blubber-bunkered guard”
lolz
LikeLike
Varying the speed and wavering the pitch between medium and low register. Find an excuse to say something close right into her ear but don’t whisper, use a deep murmur. The female ear is USB port routed through the spine, directly to the snatch.
LikeLike
Low-talking. Keep it low, deep, indistinct, like a resonant mutter, so she’s forced to lean into you to hear what you’re saying. Mumble Game.
LikeLike
Once long ago I was told, Words are to women what lingerie is to men.
Maybe I read it here.
Anyway, it’s always been useful to remember that. I get to a woman through her ears much easier than through her eyes.
LikeLike
It’s an old maxim:
Men fall in love by their eyes,
Women by their ears.
LikeLike
useful article, cap, sentient, et al:
https://atlanticcenturion.wordpress.com/2016/05/13/facebook-is-the-nuclear-icbm-of-metapolitical-warfare/
LikeLike
Facebook is becoming the ultimate media platform. I bet Facebook will get streaming/broadcasting rights to the superbowl in years to come.
I have no doubt in my mind that Zuckerjew has a hand in shaping the content that is allowed/not allowed. Its been going on for over a century its not like all of a sudden Facebook is the true honest oasis of information. Of course thats what (((they))) want you to think.
And of course Zuckerheeb is now circling the waggons with cuck establishment republicucks to help scapegoat the truth with publicized meetings.
Trump needs to start a media network through secret channels. Fight the Faceberg.
LikeLike
…except that nobody under say 30 is even using it anymore. Yeah, I mean, except reality.
Fakebook is a joke. Amazon is even worse. I honestly think that their tribe cousins on Wall St exaggerate their valuations so that the tribe can acquire actual companies via stock transactions. They are a tribe of fuckin check kiters and paper ponzis. This is why they’ve been run out of every single country they’ve ever inhabited.
LikeLike
@trav777
I agree. Suspected as much for a long time. The ENTIRE economy is just a jewpyramid scheme. Only actual things and services have real value. Not ‘futures’. Not ‘petrodollars’. Those things are just tribe trickery.
LikeLike
“…except that nobody under say 30 is even using it anymore. Yeah, I mean, except reality.”
Trav you’re dead wrong man. Facebook’s viewership stats are insane. They’re advertising platform is legit and its raking in the bucks.
http://www.statista.com/statistics/271258/facebooks-advertising-revenue-worldwide/
Check your facts. Im not saying its good, but truth is that Faceberg is a monster and is growing.
LikeLike
“Several former Facebook “news curators,” as they were known internally, also told Gizmodo that they were instructed to artificially “inject” selected stories into the trending news module, even if they weren’t popular enough to warrant inclusion—or in some cases weren’t trending at all. The former curators, all of whom worked as contractors, also said they were directed not to include news about Facebook itself in the trending module.
In other words, Facebook’s news section operates like a traditional newsroom, reflecting the biases of its workers and the institutional imperatives of the corporation. Imposing human editorial values onto the lists of topics an algorithm spits out is by no means a bad thing—but it is in stark contrast to the company’s claims that the trending module simply lists “topics that have recently become popular on Facebook.””
http://gizmodo.com/former-facebook-workers-we-routinely-suppressed-conser-1775461006
LikeLike
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/12/facebook-trending-news-leaked-documents-editor-guidelines
Facebook news selection is in hands of editors not algorithms, documents show
Exclusive: Leaked internal guidelines show human intervention at almost every stage of its news operation, akin to a traditional media organization
LikeLike
But don’t you dare say (((they))) control the media… and to prove that they don’t control things, you’ll never work in this town again.
LikeLike
In mod…
see number 5
LikeLike
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3536586/Mark-Zuckerberg-slams-Donald-Trump-keynote-speech-thinly-veiled-dig-building-walls-warns-reduce-trade-stoke-fear-block-free-expression.html
Why is all this faked “trending news” BS an issue?
Zuckerberg:
“‘As I look around and I travel around the world, I’m starting to see people and nations turning inward, against this idea of a connected world and a global community,’ he said.
‘I hear fearful voices calling for building walls and distancing people they label as others. For blocking free expression, for slowing immigration, reducing trade, and in some cases around the world even cutting access to the internet.’”
LikeLike
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3536586/Mark-Zuckerberg-slams-Donald-Trump-keynote-speech-thinly-veiled-dig-building-walls-warns-reduce-trade-stoke-fear-block-free-expression.html#v-4593044634950548443
Here it from Zuck hisself…
[One of the Top 5 Most Dangerous men in the world – FB daily used now over 1 billion]
LikeLike
Surprised gaybook didn’t trend things like, ‘Fat chink women throw themselves at Zuckersperg’, or, ‘Computer geeks get more chics than rock stars.’ Hahaaa. Faggot.
LikeLike
If Fuckerberg is so against building a wall for his own country, that he surely nust be against Israel’s walls.
But of course we don’t hear him so anything about that.
LikeLike
http://gizmodo.com/facebook-employees-asked-mark-zuckerberg-if-they-should-1771012990
Facebook Employees Asked Mark Zuckerberg If They Should Try to Stop a Donald Trump Presidency
LikeLike
“Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the 2008 VP running mate to John McCain, was one of the five Carson said was on the list. The rest are all former 2016 GOP presidential candidates: Trump’s closest competitor Sen. Ted Cruz, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Sen. Marco Rubio, and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.”
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/15/ben-carson-reveals-five-trump-vp-list/
LikeLiked by 1 person
If this be true, ne’er before was a crown, so nearly won, so easily lost.
Sigh.
I can’t believe Trump would take said list seriously.
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘Probably his best choice’
– Only of those five names mentioned in the WaPo story, as told to them by Ben Carson (?)…it doesn’t pass smell test. But if those really are the only choices he’s interested in, so be it.
Anyway the VP choice isn’t usually announced until summer and right before the convention, to maximize media buzz.
LikeLike
It could be misinformation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m thinking it’s bait, and a pacifier. Right now he’s trying to unify the Republican party. He’s throwing them off the scent. Once he secures the nomination he’s going to select David Duke.
LikeLike
This is from the Washington Compost, so take it with a grain of salt.
Assuming it’s a true story, Lubio is probably his best choice: the ticket puts a lock on winning FL; he would be easy to mold into his Apprentice; he neutralizes anti-Latino criticisms; he becomes Trump’s inside man on Capitol Hill. Let them bury the hatchet.
To try to top that, Hillary would have to select a LGBT mixed-race BLM activist.
LikeLike
“Lubio is probably his best choice: the ticket puts a lock on winning FL”
Not sure about that — remember Rubio got spanked in Florida; he doesn’t seem that popular in Florida. Also, toward the end things got pretty nasty between Trump and Rubio (as they did with Cruz). Also, with Florida as his adopted second-state, Trump could win FL without any help.
Of all the 2016 contenders, Kasich is probably the best pick. He was popular enough in his home state of Ohio that he beat Trump there; he would be a more reliable pick to deliver “his” key state of Ohio for Trump. Also, things never got quite so nasty between Trump and Kasich (admittedly because Kasich was never really a threat to Trump outside of Ohio).
That said, I’m not convinced that Kasich is the right pick. Just that he’s probably the best out of that group.
LikeLike
A dumbass Spic Neo-con and Jeb! protege homosexual on poppers? So fabulous! “Probably his best choice”!
No, wait. HELL NO!
Oh good God, Hackett, stop sniffing the WaComPo!
LikeLike
–Gentlemen, no disrespect to Hackett, and certainly not to Corvo, but let’s be sensible: remember, this one actually IS the most important election of our times.
We absolutely should not indulge this sort of favorite son/who moderates the ticket type of game. This is nothing less than a recipe for Trump’s jet to go down in an unforeseen “accident”.
Kasich is gay. Rubio is gay. They are both bought-&-paid-for NeoCon warmongers who openly speak of suckerpunching Pres. Putin, the very champion in the East we seek to gain a counterpart for in our own land.
Trump’s absolute consideration should be a pick who is totally on his side of the ledger, personally and politically; who gives not an inch of excuse to those in Congress, the judiciary, and the media who will seek to marginalize Trump’s mandate (which by the EC and popular vote I expect to be YUGE) next January to do so; and who, if anything, is personally even more frightening (more intractable, more religious, more “demagogic”) to their timid sensibilities than Trump himself.
He could pick Sessions, he could pick Tancredo, etc. These are people who would never in a million years have been dreamed of before but then, let us remember, Trump has changed everything. Which means we should shake ourselves free from the nightmare of even thinking we have to consider nothings like Little Rubio or Gaysich for this. We can have an “impossible” Veep because, God be praised, we already have an “impossible” nominee!
LikeLike
–lolzolz and for honesty’s sake, I should confess I started reading this comments thread bottoms-up, having clicked on Greg E’s latest comment.
So the preceding diatribes were penned before I even saw the breitbart link.
Well, hell, let’s hope it’s just a troll job on Trump’s part.
Years ago I dreamed (was this 2012 I guess?) that Palin was a nominee a second time around.
Personally, I really like her. Camille Paglia defended her time and again. Until Women’s suffrage is abolished, I’m willing to draw on the talent pool we’ve got.
But Commerce Sec would be a much safer perch for her.
LikeLike
“Kasich is gay. Rubio is gay.”
No argument from me there.
I haven’t really given it much thought yet. I guess the VP speculation is inevitable, but it seems early to have a short list of < 10 names as reported.
On the one hand, I ask myself: What influence has Joe Biden had on the Obama agenda? None that I can see. Viewing the VP as a meaningless office argues in favor of making a pure political play in an effort to achieve the real prize –Trump winning in November.
On the other hand, there is the danger of someone taking out a President Trump and the VP taking over the job. This argues for picking a Sessions or some other nationalist patriot. I haven’t yet studied the field to know who would be the most attractive option here, sadly because we have so many cucks and globalists in the GOP and so few nationalist patriots.
LikeLike
@Hackett To Bits
Most Americans don’t give half a rats ass about fag rights or black power groups like blm. (I always think ‘bowel movement’ when I see those initials) TPTB, with their near complete ownership of the media, make it SEEM like a majority of people care, but we don’t. It’s just more cultmarx trickery. As far as the VP choice, I don’t see why Trump would ask any of the losers to run with him. The man knows what he’s doing and it seems to me that Trump might win at least 48 states, crushing Hillary into dust.
LikeLike
The @washingtonpost report on potential VP candidates is wrong. Marco Rubio and most others mentioned are NOT under consideration.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 16, 2016
LikeLike
Of those, Palin and Christie are non-objectionable but Palin is polarizing so he can as well go the full yardage and get Coulter. Christie doesn’t bring any establishment support nor geographic advantage. Picking Cruz or Kasich is begging for a Hinkley. I can appreciate Hackett’s case for Lubio.
LikeLike
Of those, Palin and Christie are non-objectionable but Palin is polarizing so he can as well go the full yardage and choose Coulter. Christie doesn’t bring any establishment support nor geographic advantage. Picking Cruz or Kasich is begging for a Hinkley. I can appreciate Hackett’s case for Lubio.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, if you’re going to pick Palin, might as well go with Coulter… nobody can accuse her of being dumb, and she always counterpunches better than her opponent.
Still, that might be too much fire on the ticket.
Christie for AG, not VP.
I can’t see Trump picking one of the been-there, done-that GOP pols… but who knows. If he picks Rubio or Kasich, the only message that sends is business-as-usual in DC, and puts a bigger target on Trump’s back.
I’m hoping he’s going to surprise us all, in a big way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A few things we can be sure of: he’s not in it to do things half-ass. Not at his age, not after having done so much already.
Also, he’s a genius strategist. One other thing… he’s spent his whole professional life partying with all kinds of well placed people, all of whom drank and talked while he smiled and listened.
LikeLike
I’m of the mind that this “list” is just a feeler, to get an idea of what the general consensus might be, but not the only set of VP options.
Besides, isn’t it too early for that yet? Isn’t the best time to choose a VP either during or after the RNC?
I’d like either Gingrich or Sessions to take the slot.
LikeLike
President Sarah Palin is not objectionable you? My God, man.
LikeLike
Sessions. He’s a pro and has actual experience.
LikeLike
Top five on Predict It are Gingrich 26, Ernst 10, Sessions 9, Kasich 8, Christie 8. Then dozens below these. Seems completely up in the air to me.
https://www.predictit.org/Market/1529/Who-will-win-the-2016-Republican-vice-presidential-nomination
LikeLike
Oh heck no. If he does it, he’ll lose half his support.
Ann Coulter, Ann Coulter, and Ann Coulter.
Think outside the box rape!
LikeLike
I like it. It’s the only choice that checks all the right boxes.
fresh meat rape!
LikeLiked by 1 person
And prevents assassination.
Can you imagine what a President Coulter would do in revenge if Trump got assassinated? Every leftist in America would shit themself just contemplating the reprisals. And every real American would stand up and jack off to the thought.
Vice President Ann rapes the left rape!
LikeLiked by 1 person
We can have an “impossible” Veep because, God be praised, we already have an “impossible” nominee!
COTW… at first I was cautious, but now I’m convinced… either Sessions or Coulter… let’s tear this mother out!
But what a laugh, that Sharknado 3 turnout out to be so prophetic. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pardon my French, but holy fück, she’d be a riot as Vice President. I can see it now… her secret police rounding up leftist agitators and sending them to Gitmo…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just jacked off to your post. Not even kidding.
Round ’em up rape!
LikeLike
Vegas always knows the outcome to a spooky level. Odds were 11:4 (highest) for Gingrich. I think that’s a great choice.
LikeLike
In a sane world, Gringrich would be an excellent choice… but another old white guy on the ticket isn’t going to wet a lot of clams that ain’t wet already.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Brevity, baby.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Brevity, baby.”
Hey, Come here, Yeh, Let’s go, Follow me, Kiss me, On your knees, Bend over…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve noticed this with high IQ nerds is that they “hello m’lady” using big words and clever nerdism not as a form a seduction but as a verbal handshake. I’ve seen interviews of Rosie and she’s sort of smitten (or amused by) Statham’s apparent street level knowledge of cockney slang. He could simply be power wording through “you like me ones and twos, do you love?” and getting the result we seen in the pic.
nerds otoh will try to Professor Frink some words together to say, “hey, gllaavin, you encromulate well with this foilage?” or some such shit, told with the male nerd equivalent of an upward inflective. The goal is an invite for the girl to speak in her own nerdism which, of course, not happening.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can just hear the cockney in that phrase. Especially adding the “do you love?” line.
I like CH’s meta use of big words via this line:
imagining that women are aroused by their linguistic prestidigitation.
And to that: some big, fancy words work better in print than they do in real life and vice versa.
Less is always more and like CH said, you gotta sprinkle them in here and there. Like spices to a recipe…just enough to give it some flavor and spruce it up.
This is also were be genuine/authentic comes into play. Do not use a word that you’ve just learned and don’t have a good grasp of.
I’m sure one has a solid vocabulary full of fancy words that aren’t said in the vernacular of the masses that would impress the fine filly.
LikeLike
Interesting. There was a old-school Brooklyn speech trope amongst the lower middle-class that I’ve picked up from my uncle: use of big words, over-pronunciated. So, for example: vegetable, pronounced veg-GE-ta-BULL.
Chicks dig it.
LikeLike
I, personally, like Latin game. Aside from doctors and lawyers, Latin is about dead, so even knowing a handful of expressions outside those in general use puts you in a different class. I have a “wit and wisdom” calendar from a number of years ago with “practical” phrases like “you’re hot” in Latin. Just gazing into a woman’s eyes and uttering a simple phrase will make her drip. Then she’ll want to know what you said. Playing coy with the answer can extend a flagging conversation for a half-hour or more.
LikeLike
Nothing wets her clam like learning that all of Gaul is divided into three parts.
/first year Latin rape!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Darn you, GE. I spend a while loitering on a beach in Latin America growing a chair outta my ass….and I check in for a sec and find you still painting the corner here. Well-played sir.
LikeLike
@driveallnight
A tip o’ the ten gallon for your shout-out, sir.
I relish the rare moment when a jest does not fall flat. 😉
LikeLike
“One, start off using small words. The brain, especially the female brain, latches onto these first. These are your foundation.”
Especially.
LikeLike
If Trump has a woman for V.P. it will begin to kill his campaign. It is built on machismo and guts, and no woman can really carry that.
He said he wanted someone who knew the political process and could help him get things through Congress. That will take a man with toughness and panache to follow Trumps lead and be loyal to him.
A woman will bog him down. Not to mention innuendo as to whether she’s just there because he’s f**king her on the side.
LikeLike
Women. Dumb, emotional, glib.
LikeLike
Nowadays I just mutter, (quieter than they can be sure), “I am a hit-man for Donald Trump.” Cough, cough.
Makes them wet as October.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent obscure Rome reference rape!
LikeLike
Credit were due on that one, Rum.
LikeLike
Senior policewoman suspended after spat with female colleague over ‘who has the best breasts’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/15/senior-policewoman-suspended-after-spat-with-female-colleague-ov/
LikeLike
LikeLike
Useless pic.
LikeLike
Unless we can see their breasts, why should we care?
LikeLike
I’ll be the judge of that….
LikeLike
Beat me to it. Well-played.
They went to Best Breasts because the Best Face wound up in a dead heat.
LikeLike
Judge Nap ftw.
LikeLike
CH,
From the “What we have lost” department, see this 1940’s training film on sexual relations
LikeLike
Reblogged this on XWorkx.
LikeLike
“One, start off using small words. The brain, especially the female brain, latches onto these first. These are your foundation.
Two, to show your intelligence sprinkle higher words”
trump style
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi — love your blog — first time commentator —
This is a bit off topic, but it might give you an idea. I’ve found that if you learn a bit about current fashion, it can be a great opening line. For instance, “Is that a Cynthia Rowley dress?” Chicks love it.
LikeLike
Really great!
LikeLike
I’d like to thank Heartiste, first off, for quoting me in my entirety. It sounds
sycophantic to veer toward flattery, but that’s also the simplest way to extend the hand of friendship. So thanks Heartiste. Nothing’s better than to find a peer and to be recognized by him.
Now, I’d like to make an interesting addendum to my arrogant posting about seducing females with simpler words. And that is using big words as *psychological weapons* against chicks.
As Heartiste observers know, it’s critical to gain the social status edge over the woman you want to ball, in one form or another. Some criminal types gain the edge be being hard badasses where every woman knows she is really weak. Some players gain the edge by being the chasee, “flipping the script.” But I prefer to use aggressive, assaultative tactics that reduce the female to a quivering puddle of tearful jelly. Call it the habit of a god.
One way to make yourself higher in the aggressive, divine fashion — yet a
low-energy, fun way — is to knock your seduction target down as many pegs as you like through the use of big, flowery, insulting words.
You can belittle, insult, catcall, and use all kinds of blunt-trauma words against a female, ONCE SHE LIKES YOU. The precondition is essential. She must be invested in you, extended a tendril into your heart, before you bring your hand down to chop it off … And then you can draw her in closer emotionally again. And then you can chop it off again. Unpredictability.
But anyway, She has to like you and respect you for the hammer to hurt the most.
One way to bring her down is to make her feel stupid. Since females are, of course, stupid, this isn’t that hard to do. (When was the last time you heard two females discussing the business world, or computers, or quantum mechanics? Like … NEVER.) But they understand words. From years of gabbing, females are INVESTED in words as entities. You must understand that words live for females in a way they live for few males, with the exception of polyglots like myself and Heartiste. We have the power of words … you do not. And girls don’t have the power of words, but they LUXURIATE in them, like standing in a waterfall in summertime tropics. Their cow-like breasts dangling, their broad, child-bearing hips thrust back … their vulvas slick from … imagining Sorcerygod, no doubt. *grinning*
So bring her down by making her feel stupid. It rises you, and expedites the frequency and excitement of the sex you’ll be getting. (You can also get money from the chicks, but that’s another posting). Blunt-trauma complex word cascades are great entertainment too, if you’ve got it in you, and I, Sorcerygod, do. Call it the anti-pedestalizing finishing move.
So in that previous posting I made that Heartiste cited, I advocate using mostly strong, straightforward words (not necessarily basic; a word like “annihilation” is effective, even though it’s higher than basic, especially when used with your tongue curled as you spit it out). But to hurt a female’s feelings, unleash a flurry of complex, syntactically linked words at her in a withering fire, as if her brains were beneath you. She’ll think you’re a high alpha and she’s a high alpha’s fvck toy. Note that you must have what’s called “congruence” with the rest of yourself … you can’t be a weakling and pull this off. I don’t really believe that wusses can do this, so it’s a platinum-gold move to show off your true domineering essence to a woman, if, once again, you’ve got the chops. But if you do, consider it.
You’ll find her wilting from the onslaught and then, if she likes you (& this is a good test if she does) she’ll try to rush back in your arms, upset and needful. Rinse, repeat, dry, as often as necessary to wash that dumb plate of its ego.
P.S. In conclusion, I would like to thank Heartiste for his years of good effort here. Although he is much hated by those with liberal tendencies (parasites), those without recognize Heartiste as being a superbly well-written, genuinely capable, alluring divinity like myself. Kudos, my lord. PRIMUS INTER PARES.
— Sorcerygod
P.P.S. I notice the haters have already started coming after me in the comments. These small-dicked men with inferior minds can come after me all they want in the virtual realm, but if I was with you in person, I would make you BOW. Bye bye. *single finger waved up at you as I leave*
LikeLike
The war against the small-dicked, mentally inferior haters is best waged with a strong shoulder…
… beware you don’t injure yours, patting yourself on the back like that.
LikeLike
Your confidence is impressing!
LikeLike
This is that faggot from a few years ago. I forget his name.
LikeLike
I wonder if it’s not so much small vs. long words as Anglo-Saxon vs. Latinate words. This was something understood by Winston Churchill: for English speakers, the Anglo-Saxon words carry more weight. They sound more true and honest. The most memorable political and commercial slogans are in plain English words. “We shall never give up!” “The real thing.” “Morning in America.”
Utilizing Latinate terminology inevitably conveys the impression that you are psychologically insecure, and are being evasive or otherwise duplicitous.
If you speak in plain English words you sound wise and brave.
LikeLike
Denise Richards, 45 going on 12:
LikeLike
That face is going on 65! Eesh.
LikeLike
So I’m walking into the orifice today, looking particularly sharp (custom-made double-breasted navy pinstripe suit, monk straps) and a decent-looking manageress in her 40s (WB) exclaims, “my, don’t you look snappy today!”
My response? “I know.” Smirk. Keep walking. She blushed. Didn’t expect that.
Don’t say something beta like “oh gosh, thanks! You too!” Less is more. I’m a handsome bloke and I know it.
As discussed previously, young, higher SMV women are stingy with compliments (so when they do give them, it’s game on). Older women, their defences are down, so know how proceed with them accordingly.
Ps – women are easily amused and bemused with silly little baubles, be they oral, aural, or visual.
LikeLike
I’m walking into the orifice
——————————————————————————–
Which orifice did you walked into when mangeress said
my oh my ?
LikeLike