COTW winner is LongWhiteCon, on the id-soaked reality facing White women who bear mixed race kids.
I don’t know too many men who dream about having kids (our nature is different, and it’s a vague abstract thought, mixed with necessary battle-wariness). However, ALL women dream of having kids, from the days they’re 18 months and playing with dolls and gurgling ‘aww, look at the baby-so cute!’. As slightly more mature women (slightly) their thoughts lean towards wanting to see some of themselves in the child they bear. As opposed to the father, they KNOW they’re the mother, and are assuming everything will go to plan. At first, they’re enthralled with their little mocha baby, with blonde hair and green eyes, but at 6 months, they’re aghast at how much the dark gene has taken over, laying to waste all the mother’s traits. A comment from a friend at the ‘caffeecleek’ (peer-group very important) along the lines of ‘she has such lovely brown eyes’ can really be a devastating shiv.
Like CH has said (and something which anthropologist Peter Frost has echoed in his writings), the White European aesthetic, behavioral and physical, is the result of a few thousand years of specialized, highly circumstantial selection for exquisitely refined traits that exist nowhere else in the world. Turning one’s back on that genetic heritage is akin to crapping on the Mona Lisa.
PA adds a painful twist,
That shiv is not for the squeamish, but in perverse times an acid bath of truth can save others from making a horrible mistake.
Another such built-in shiv lies in the word “beautiful.” Sarah Palin called her Downs Syndrome baby that. No scorn on her, as a sick child is a tragedy. But the point is, that nobody calls a normal child “beautiful.”
I see distant acquaintances and occasionally their friends-of-friends on FB post their children’s photos. In the rare cases that it’s a mulatto child of a White woman, there will invariably be a “beautiful” or similar words posted in comments. Almost never, in the case of a White child of a White woman (or a Black child of a Black woman, for that matter.
Intra-female dialogue has its own subtle rules. One of those rules is, I surmise, to appear generous and giving, while distancing oneself from any association with befoulment, as understood by her within the rules of her millieu.
This comment reminded me that I had recently heard a SWPL chick use the word “beautiful” to describe the mystery meat issue in a photo of a mixed race family (white father-black mother). The infant was about as far from “beautiful” as possible, she must have known this, and her little signaling game to her fellow SWPL whites wrested a pursed lip and a curt “hm” from me. Women have an amazing tolerance for these kinds of mincing, passive-aggressive status cues.
exaclty!!! da modern western womenz:
zlozozzoozozo
the eskimozs reporgrammed europeansz womenz
to hate thier true callingsz
and deeper naturesz
and beautyzyz
and motherhood
so the eskimoes could butthext the shiskas in collegesz
so the eskimo state could own themz and make them work
menaingless jobs
instead of rasing beuatiful childrens
Check your privilege and prepare to be disgusted:
Why the fuck are you giving legs to this n1gger bullshit? 😡
You cuck fairy.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LOL
calm down Greg
lzozozolzolzolzo
zlolzozozoz zomzgzlzolzozozo
The L.H.O.O.Q. of the 21st Century.
lzozozooz
https://naturallyartificial.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/bruno_with_his_adopted_african_black_baby_surrounded_with_bees.jpg?w=600&h=765
LOL
http://jezebel.com/are-attractive-women-really-more-likely-to-be-straight-1726744517
one reason white women like to have brown babies is because they get all the credit for any talent, genius or beauty it has; and none of the blame if it turns into a mass murderer.
white women cant lose when they produce brown children.
“white women cant lose when they produce brown children” ——— said the cancer known as melanoma. LOL’ed.
[…] By CH […]
[…] Comment Of The Week: The Thousand Yard Shiv […]
You can see the shame and embarrassment in their face if you look for it.
> “‘she has such lovely brown eyes’ can really be a devastating shiv… the White European aesthetic, behavioral and physical, is the result of a few thousand years of specialized, highly circumstantial selection for exquisitely refined traits…” ——— And then there’s the question of BIOLOGICAL CALVINISM – whether or not our hindbrains might retain a deeply ingrained ability to realize that those dull dead brown eyes probably reflect a dull dead mind and a potentially murderously violent character.
Yeah, adoption is even worse, since the kid involved is 100% black instead of 50%.
Philip Chism
you think he gets fan mail from white girls?
right because procreation is so noble: create a being that’ll inevitable die, accomplishing jack-nothing along the way
[CH: better to leave a beautiful all-White corpse then, right?]
LOL, junior nihilist.
There is no more sublime a feeling in the world than to see your own face in a child.
The “junior nihilist” comment was to wowz.
Careful, someone might cut themselves on all that edge
If a female celeb goes out of her way to adopt a black infant, that is Karmic, because her wealth and fame are highly undeserved to begin with….
Ironically, the black kid will probably have a career in Hollywood due to social contacts alone, but will have little to no contact with any real black people. They will simply become simulacra/hologram oreo actors that Hollywood needs.
What kinds of “accomplishments” would, in your mind, justify the life of a human?
And justify to whom?
But why even think about it, or type a reply, or even post here? What would it accomplish?
Yet here you are.
Gawd, those babies are “cute”; they almost look human!
Tough to take them for a day at the Zoo though, the Ape House would be wondering when you kidnapped their baby apes!
Sorry CH, it seems TRS’ resident sperg, Simon Elliot, found your site. I’ll have the handlers bring the hug box, and drag him back home.
Careful, someone might cut themselves on all that edge
Oh, bravo! A shiv worthy of the chateau.
I’ll be stealing that one.
da gbfm had an extremely goood andz generous momz who breast feedsz me 2 this daysZ!!!!
she is making dinner for four tonighstz!! hearstietses you ar einvited and expectedsz!! lzzoz
lzozozol
That kid looks like he’s had his fill.
That photo pretty much sums it all up.
Nappy hair and blue eyes is so adoooorable…
Not gonna work on the 40-somethings in northern Virginia who are dragging around their obviously adopted niglets. What’s the shiv for them?
(What naturally occurs to me is way too cruel — along the lines of “hey you rode the carousel and had a ‘great career’ but left the reproduction thing a little too late, oh well…”)
At least those 40-somethings didn’t throw another meat puppet into the evolutionary grinder.
At least those 40-somethings didn’t throw another meat puppet into the evolutionary grinder.
Instead they are a total evolutionary dead end and a failure on every level.
They FAILED themselves… their family… their country… their race… the future…
Yes, they worked their entire lives to amass a nice, valuable financial legacy, just to leave it to those of another race having no genetic connection with them whatsoever. A better definition of insanity would be difficult to think of. There is a true, undeniable sickness that has infected the white race, and it cannot all be blamed on the Eskimos. The Eskimos are only bringing out the weakness that is already in many whites, as the rest of us are exposed to the same propaganda with no effect.
Tarl, the future is oblivion. Just accept it. The human race won’t be around forever, no matter how much pride you throw its way. The party is going to end someday, whether the sun burns out or the planet just can’t support us any longer, etc. It’s idiotic to try to keep it going by popping out the next batch of victims like you’re suggesting. Get over your pride and swallow the ultimate red pill. Or is it to much for you to handle?
Johnny Redux,
Good point about insanity. Most people can’t accept that their lives are ultimately futile affairs that lead to chaos. Better to never have been, but if you have been, better to be the last in your gene pool.
wowz, you are such a negative nanny.
Tarl, the future is oblivion. Just accept it.
Yours definitely is. And you should seek out that oblivion. TODAY.
> “They FAILED themselves… their family… their country… their race… the future…” ——— And their PAST. Which is why it is so fundamentally important for the Gramscian Eskimos to invade the institutions and destroy all memory of Shegetz History. In the Gramscian Cocoon of Anti-Reality, there is no Past, no Present, and no Future – no memory, no joy, and no hope. There is only THE COCOON OF DEATH.
Sounds like Eeyore and Debbie Downer had a love-child…
wowz, I don’t believe the chateau has ever hosted such a negative ass.
Tarl, the future is oblivion. Just accept it.
This guy is a very bad imitation of the very great Nihilist Arby’s.
http://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys
The most elegant shiv here would be “how lucky you both are to have found each other!”
By the way it also works on the white mom with an East Asian husband — “oh they look so Chinese!”
I love the atmosphere of awkwardness and silent judgment when a mudshark mother is around.
ot: My Secret Grief: Over 35, Single, and Childless. Grief over childlessness for a single woman is not accepted.
hamsters are the future of alternative energy.
“Melanie Notkin” ——— Well, at least she’s a childless Eskimo-ess.
I’m not sure what would compel a woman to willingly handicap her offspring like that.
a big cock?
Mental illness – just like pedophilia, homosexuality, and necrophilia.
Because a tingling vagina, despite getting the hamster spinning, has no conscience.
That is true. Once a chick is aroused she will do unconscionable things to get the D.
This is true. This is why 90% of effective female virtue lies not in resisting temptation, but in avoiding or removing herself from tempting situations.
WW love the BBC
British Broadcasting Corporation? 😇
Indeed, chicks dig accents
Beta Broadcasting Communism
The only truth to a woman are her feelings at the moment…
It can’t be an accident that civilization coevolved with european female beauty. If beauty becomes a blip on the vast timeline of human experience, civic society might die with it. Without female beauty, there is nothing to inspire men to reach for the highest heights.
How long has European female beauty even existed – a few decades? I’ve seen a grand total of about a dozen pictures, films, or paintings of European women pre-1950 that I would even want to fuck. This is what supposedly beautiful mid-century movie stars looked like. http://missosology.info/forum/viewtopic.php?t=79569
[CH: i dunno what you’re talking about. most of those women look eminently bangable.]
I’d rather fuck hot ghetto Puerto Ricans than most of those broads.
[please nigga. anyhow, the apt comparison would be between, say, 1950s white women and 1950s spic chicas.]
Yes, pussy inspires and motivates me as much as the next guy; in fact, probably a whole lot more, but civic society is not entirely dependent on it. Thomas Jefferson – arguably Mr. Civil Society in US history – was into black pussy (for the record, I’m not). Lets not go overboard.
[ultimately, everything created by humanity comes down to pussy.]
You mean Thomas Jefferson’s brother. Idiot.
All of civilization was just to impress women.
Long enough. I definitely would.
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQREgY71gxda05553kbzcQNWS545usmWgN8GLM2p3AGHP4DFjnU
Even if IRL they had that Greek bird mustache thing going on.
While the Hays Code and similar censorship was in place, through the 1950’s – there was a premium placed on a woman’s face over her naked body. So today we have “stars” with so so faces and taught athletic bodies, whereas during the “golden age” you had astonishing faces and disciplined, shapely bodies that tended to favor a little extra fat.
Thomas Jefferson – arguably Mr. Civil Society in US history – was into black pussy (for the record, I’m not). Lets not go overboard.
Heh, heh… the usual suspect “Ride, Sally, Ride” gambit.
Every notice how, for all the alleged massa/slave relationships, we only seem to hear specifics about Miss Sally?
And if you did a little further, having Jefferson DNA is probably more likely attributed to his no-account brother, who was known to hang around with the help, playing the harmonica… among other things.
Stop shilling for the Cathedral.
This is what supposedly beautiful mid-century movie stars looked like
I’ll give you how gals like Pickford, Hepburn and Bette Davis were overrated, although they were never “sex symbols” per se.
But if you think the modern star floozies of whatever mixture look better than the likes of Veronica Lake, Ann Sheridan, Monroe, Mansfield, Sophia Loren, Doris Day, Lana Turner, Jane Russel, Suzy Parker, Dolores Hart, etc., etc., etc., well… I can’t help you beyond (((shakin’ mah haid))).
“Girl with a Pearl Earring,” by Vermeer, 1665. “Circe Offering Odysseus” John William Waterhouse, 1891. Asked and Answered. European female beauty by masters.
[ultimately, everything created by humanity comes down to pussy.]
yes! d agbfm relaized this the other day,
as i gazed down upon my sixteneenn inches of buliging lsotsas cokasz
da gbfm realzided
dat it too
was
sadly enough
made for
a
pususysysustssysyys
pususysyss
llzozolzolzozozoo ozmzgzlzlzoz
If you click on Dirk’s link, he page has these Summer’s Eve ads running… Their new slogan is “Hail to the V”…
LOL – they have a “Vagina Owner’s Manual” as well… LOL
http://www.summerseve.com/vagina-owners-manual
This blog is a vagina owner’s manual.
speaking of vaginas…
i know this is supposed to be trump saying china over and over but it sure sounds a lot more like gina, gina, gina, gina…..
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-says-china_55e06f30e4b0aec9f352e904?026b6gvi
Not to brag, but my 5th g-grandfather’s brother knew Jefferson. My 3rd g-grandfather fought in the Revolution alongside William Clark, of Lewis and Clark fame. A cousin of one of those crackers spawned Booker T. Washington. They banged them some Negroes, they did.
“How long has European female beauty even existed – a few decades?”
You’re kidding, of course (right?), but seeing women in color, in video, through the vehicle of hypersexualized media may give the false impression that women today are more beautiful than the black-n-white photos of women in modest dress of yesteryear. But that’s all it is- a false impression. Climbing BMIs, thousand cock stares, Prozac and alcohol tolls have depreciated modern beauty. Your dick would prefer 1950.
A girl on 1959.
They really had more estrogen then. Girls don’t move or smile like that anymore, except on Amish farms.
How about, “Awww, they’re just as cute as Nicole Brown Simpson’s were.”
Not to thread-hijack, but i have a question for the commenters and CH, if he cares to chime in:
Do you oppose ‘mochas’ getting together with other ‘mochas?’
[CH: i oppose the miscegnation propaganda and braindead platitudes meant to paper over the uncomfortable truth.
on an individual, case by case basis, i wouldn’t want to get in between two people who authentically love each other.]
Human life = sharing of braindead platitudes meant to paper over the uncomfortable truth
Just embrace the futility of life, CH, because you yourself continue to cover up the most uncomfortable truth of all, striving to find meaning in a meaningless world.
The pistol is right there…on the night stand. Just do it, Squid.
What’s futile is your continued insipid commenting… as well as your continued existence.
Go away.
[CH: i wouldn’t want to get in between two people who authentically love each other]
CH – you old softy
[CH: anyhow, any intervention would be firmly resisted by a couple that was really in love.]
[CH: anyhow, any intervention would be firmly resisted by a couple that was really in love.]
But you can exile them from your society.
[CH: true. old school style. and it would serve as a lesson for the others.]
“CH: i oppose the miscegnation propaganda and braindead platitudes meant to paper over the uncomfortable truth.
on an individual, case by case basis, i wouldn’t want to get in between two people who authentically love each other.]”
In making the comment about a baby’s eyes that you indicate, aren’t you doing just that?
[CH: did i forbid her from having her half-dindu?]
That’s the same reply that a woman would have said.
That shiv is not for the squeamish, but in perverse times an acid bath of truth can save others from making a horrible mistake.
Another such built-in shiv lies in the word “beautiful.” Sarah Palin called her Downs Syndrome baby that. No scorn on her, as a sick child is a tragedy. But the point is, that nobody calls a normal child “beautiful.”
I see distant acquaintances and occasionally their friends-of-friends on FB post their children’s photos. In the rare cases that it’s a mulatto child of a White woman, there will invariably be a “beautiful” or similar words posted in comments. Almost never, in the case of a White child of a White woman (or a Black child of a Black woman, for that matter.
Intra-female dialogue has its own subtle rules. One of those rules is, I surmise, to appear generous and giving, while distancing oneself from any association with befoulment, as understood by her within the rules of her millieu.
I still like a previouse commenter who said to a white mom with a ni66let “oh it looks just like you…”
I’m a white man in my 30s, have been with a Latina for several years. This worries me. Should I have kids with her since she is sweet, maternal, and was a virgin when I met her? Or should I leave her based on her race, having taken most of her 20s? She is fairly light skinned, but I worry that when my kids come out with brown eyes, I won’t really love them as my own.
[CH: if you’re deeply truly in love with her, and she you, you should stay with her.]
“Should I have kids with her (feminine Latina) …”
The child will look 95% like her, brownness too, along with Aztec facial features, and straight wire jet black hair, if she is an Indio-Mestiza. He or she will likely have your intelligence. She will likely be a good mother.
Your family may or may not naturally embrace the child. Hers probably will, para mejorar la raza.
It’s up to each man to decide if it’s OK for him to mix. It’s up to you.
True, as it sounds as if the OP has light (white) skin and blue or green eyes (Anglo/Nordic decent), in which case the Latina woman is truly breeding up, and her family would appreciate the lighter-skinned, more intelligent, children.
I recently had a pleasant and interesting social conversation with a Latin American mestizo couple in Spanish. They were older, well-to-do, and high status in their country. I speak ok Spanish, they spoke no English. One of their daughters had married an American man and they said completely without self consciousness, in that context, that phrase, “mejorar la raza.”
He didn’t describe her as “aztec/mayan”. She could be more European/Spanish in ancestry. There are some truly beautiful Latinas: look at Ms Costa Rica or Ms Venezuela entrants in every Ms World contest—most of them are stunning and just a few degrees from European.
Collect the set. Get one wife of each color, breed ’em, and decide which clutch of your kids you like the best. Then leave them all your money. Sell the others to organ traffickers.
“collect the set…” lol
The neighbors of my aunt are from Mexico. You wouldn’t be able to tell them apart from anyone in the Spanish upper class. Latin people can vary greatly in how much their lineage is made up of European, Amerindian, even African heritage. Take a good look at her facial features and compare them to Native Americans and Spanish, and you can probably get a feel for how much of each her ancestors were. She may have more European traits than you’d expect, and you might just be overreacting.
My mother-in-law’s best friend many years ago was a daughter of the second richest man in Mexico. She had blonde hair and blue eyes and had married an American and so had an Anglo-Saxon last name. Beachside of that, people meeting her were surprised when she spoke with an accent. Her family wasn’t that thrilled about the marriage because they were very cultured people who patronized the art and music, the family was already white and didn’t need any lightening, and the American husband was a just a tradesman in the movie industry who cheated on her mercilessly. Nevertheless they could live on her money in a large house in Hancock Park and she dutifully carried her burden raising a large brood of children and suffering in silent heartbreak.
CH is right. too hard to find sweet, maternal, loyal women in this day and age. and sure there are always more girls but it’s especially hard to find someone you deeply love who also loves you deeply in return. you really just aren’t going to find that everyday. lucky to find it once in a lifetime.
and if you are attracted to her appearance (you most likely are or you wouldn’t be with her) it is very unlikely that you will have a problem bonding with your children. they will have some of your traits and some of hers. most likely traits that you already like seeing in her since you obviously don’t have a problem being attracted to non-white traits. don’t blow it man. quit worrying about what other people think and go make some babies.
You’ll find out that when children actually arrive, feelings kick in that you never knew you had… and you’ll think back about your erstwhile worry about brown eyes and laugh at yourself.
Then again, I’m hoping you’re not just some jerkoff troll, and if you actually wasted this poor woman’s best years, shame on you.
Either a jerkoff troll, or a beta who went brown because he couldn’t hack it with white girls.
“CH: if you’re deeply truly in love with her, and she you, you should stay with her.]”
But why, given the downsides you and others have cited?
[CH: a healthy society can tolerate a few tar-crossed lovers.]
refried beeenz lzlzozozzozo
Well-played, CH: tar-crossed lovers… that’s gold, Jerry… gold!
HAHA…no shit. I missed it the first time, it was so sublime.
Knock her up. I have seen plenty of mixed race children which were stronger, smarter, and better looking than their white parent.
As I have stated before; a lot of whites have weak genes, and aren’t going to be able to attract a white mate suitable enough to strengthen their sub – par blood line. The only other choice is race mixing. Choose wisely though.
Plus, you could always knock up a white chick later.
YKW trollery detected.
“As I have stated before; a lot of whites have weak genes, and aren’t going to be able to attract a white mate suitable enough to strengthen their sub – par blood line. ”
Um right. Except for sub Saharan africans, South Americans, middle easterners, many asians…
“I have seen plenty of mixed race children which were stronger, smarter, and better looking than their white parent.”
Hey everyone. Hugo Internet Eskimo troll here saw some miscegnated brown kids that he says were smart and stuff. That means Diversity is actually good and we need to increase interacial offsrpring, immigration of poor countries to white countries and accelerate our triumph into r-selection paradise.
Unless you are some kind of sociopath, you will love your children. Stop worrying about what other people think and do whatever the fuck you want to do.
If one was engaging in a race war the next best thing to not having white kids would be to not have kids with the other races most attractive females or steer then towards the really dark ones. Also, if she is on birth control then the statistics say she is likely to cuck you if you are not alpha enough.
Her name’s not Columba, is it?
In the off-chance that you’re not a troll . . .
There are Latinas and there are Latinas. You say she’s fairly light-skinned, sweet, maternal, and was a virgin when you met her; can she cook? If she’s fit and good-looking, it sounds to me like you may have a keeper. Well done.
Plenty of White people have brown eyes – I doubt it will bother you.
exactly
Hilarious comment of the week, but so true.
There is something odd about white female coal burners. And to qualify, i’m speaking of WF coal burners that are of at least avg SMV.
It’s similar to an element of bad childhood upbringing like being abused or fatherless.
And also the offspring of mixed races are almost always problem childs.
It’s kinda funny how you glossed over what I said – and instead – concocted your own straw men to knock down. Only a special kind of moron thinks they can edit someone’s opinion to fit into their retarded viewpoint and it won’t be obvious to anyone reading it.
Funny thing is – in the meat world – the type of white person constantly braying about the SUPERIORITY OF THE WHITE RACE! are usually the dregs of our kind.
Hey Forrest, when I stated some white people had genes which were too weak, did that hit a little too close to home?
“The only other choice is race mixing. Choose wisely though.”
Your parents are disappointed. Natural selection is on the horizon, mystery meat.
“some white people had genes which were too weak, did that hit a little too close to home?”
No genes are “weak”. Anywhere, even in snails, or Hugos. They all have identical molecular bonds.
Some however can prove deleterious in certain environments.
Trouble is, nobody knows for sure which ones they are. Because the really dodgy ones no longer exist, for obvious reasons.
And they for sure can’t determine if they’re confined to any particular race. or they most certainly would be shouting it to the rooftops.
Bizarre quasi-Victorian caricature of the subject. Fail.
It’s part of the reason obvious chromosome damage is so distressing when encountered.
Both of my parents were Great Whites, as am I. Now bow down before me, Untermensch.
For years I’ve struggled between wanting easy sex and chasing a fulfilling relationship. Eventually it felt like groundhog day and I started looking for a woman that might be a good mother. As a white guy, I have nothing against dating white women, but finding one who is a virgin and knows how to cook is hard these days. I’ve been dating a Filipina and she checks all the boxes, though sometimes I wonder how my kids would turn out with her, especially if we had a son. She’s on the shorter side, and something about Filipinos seems more submissive than westerners. To be fair, some Filipino guys can be casanovas and are somewhat notorious for the whole fuck and run thing. If my son were to be shorter and more submissive on average, that would hurt his chances of passing on the family name. Flipside, if I had a daughter it would probably dramatically increase her chances of landing a better guy.
I’m not too worried about their IQ. I’m on the far right of the IQ curve, and having kids with another smart woman would more likely put them at risk for autism than give them any leg up. Higher IQ is also a reliable predictor for increased chance of involuntary celibacy. Hell, if anything it might be a good thing, making them more socially successful.
A pair of normal-high-IQ parents doesn’t produce disproportionately more offspring with autism, just like a pair of normal-short parents doesn’t produce disproportionately more offspring with dwarfism.
IQ is much like an average between the two parents. For a more accurate estimate, find out their grandparents’ IQs and then apply the breeder’s equation.
https://westhunt.wordpress.com/2013/06/07/the-breeders-equation/
http://doublehelixranch.com/heritability.html
Agree 100% on autism risk with two high IQ parents: http://www.livestrong.com/article/1006821-autism-parents-high-iq/#page=1
In any case, mating with a high IQ woman does not mean that your child will have a high IQ due to the concept of regression towards the mean: http://www.quora.com/Why-didnt-Einsteins-descendants-inherit-Einsteins-IQ
I’ve been dating a Filipina and she checks all the boxes, though sometimes I wonder how my kids would turn out with her, especially if we had a son.
Either raise any boys encouraging them to expat to Asia, or to go after Asian or Latina chicks.
I don’t know. I used to work with a guy whose dad was Chinese, from Hong Kong. He was in good shape from playing soccer and had the easy, relaxed sense of humor that comes from a surfeit of self-confidence. CH readers will not be surprised to hear that he practically had to beat the honeys off with a stick.
Please tell me flipside was an intentional pun. Cause that’s a good one
does CH have plans for fatherhood or is he just poolside?
I remember in the early 90s when the latest buzz was how ‘beautiful’ mulattos were, and they were considered the future beauty standard. Yet, the only ones I ever saw were shit brown ugly, and those early mudsharks were quite hideous.
The cutest high-yellers in my mind are Vanessa Williams and Halle Berry, in their heydays.
But if that was going to be the hightest level of female beauty on the planet, then stop the world, I’d rather disembark.
No one is more beautiful than Rihanna!
I can’t stand looking at her. I think her face is repulsive. barf.
The *maximum* percentage of ancestry that another group can have with whites before the looks of the daughter (at adulthood) drops are :
Light Brown : 50%
East Asian : 50%
Southeast Asian : 25%
Dark Brown : 25%
Negro : 0-10%
Negros have an immediate detrimental effect on white looks, because not just is their skin color the darkest by far, but their hair, nose, and lips are also simian rather than human. Other races at least have straight hair, human lips, and human noses.
“hair, nose, and lips”
For sure. And don’t forget the ni66er stink gene. They have more sweat glands, larger pores….stink more.
“Wow… your daughter looks NOTHING like you! Genes are amazing.” would be totally shiv-tastic.
And this is from a man that finds certain mullatos stunningly lovely. I’d never breed with one, though. I want kids and grandkids that look like ME… not Obama’s retarded cousins.
“… Obama’s retarded cousins… ”
Redundant much?
wowz’s snark simply helped demonstrate why atheism is bullsh!t.
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
“ But the point is, that nobody calls a normal child “beautiful.””
Anyone that says this doesn’t have children, or is just plain dumb. “Normal” children are called beautiful all the time. Especially if the child is, you know, beautiful.
[CH: nah. i’m with pa. i rarely hear anyone call an infant beautiful. that would just sound weird. people instead use terms like cute, adorable, or sometimes good-looking. except when the infant being judged is a mystery meat. then the word beautiful comes out of storage.]
“people instead use terms like cute, adorable”
It’s similar to fugly beta male’s wives that are clearly not attractive. You always the beta hubby himself or their friends say “…and his beautiful wife.” Even though they’re referring to a beastly fug of sorts.
Just like a lil nigglet half breed mystery meet with nappy hair and a big shnoz. “Beautiful”. Pfffft.
“Ah-MAY-zing” seems to be the adjective of choice among single moms, when describing their little bastards.
“Amazing” also seems to always make an appearance with divorcing women talking about their kids, and with women who deny sex to their husbands but want to keep him around “I don’t see what his problem is [with only having sex once a year]; we have an amazing son, great friends, a nice house…”
It’s like the Seinfeld episode where Elaine gets so weirded out by the doctor who describes both she and an ugly baby as “breathtaking”. Describing an acquaintance’s infant or toddler as “beautiful” is somehow unseemly.
At first, they’re enthralled with their little mocha baby, with blonde hair and green eyes, but at 6 months, they’re aghast at how much the dark gene has taken over, laying to waste all the mother’s traits.
Really? 19 months and counting:
“Little mocha baby” (context coming shortly). pic.twitter.com/417GbZbvO8
— JayMan (@JayMan471) August 31, 2015
Because no white women ever spirals down into depression because their mixed-race child looks nothing like them. I understand you religiously oppose the concepts of ethnies and genetic interests, and anything that reinforces them, but give it a rest already. Your whole obesity crusade was embarrassing enough.
Looks like an Oompa Loompa.
Mocha? Is that what you crazy kids are calling it nowadays?
Some fat white woman, otherwise pleasant enough, brings her little pickaninny into the area sometimes, and it is admittedly a cute, ever-smiling little munchkin that looks exactly like one of those troll dolls… everyone, including her, calls it her “troll baby”.
n=1 there, Mr. Science. And eyes commonly change color up to 3 to 4 years.
blue eyes have less visual accuity than brown
It’s a cute kid for sure. I’d say most mixed kids turn out more black looking than white, but there’s some like WR Miles Austin who really turn out 50/50. As far as women’s disingenuous compliments, yeah, its true. The worst is when they compliment each other on those godawful pixie cuts. It’s like they’re trying to sabotage their competition.
They are. They do it constantly too.
there’s some sabotage with the pixie cut compliments when a young thin girl is the target. but girls often compliment women who are clearly checking out of the sexual market by getting the pixie (new wives and mothers), as a way to self-soothe that they too will be considered beautiful when they give up trying to attract alphas.
His eyes will probably stay blue at this age. Congratulations.
[CH: “congratulations”. that’s a defcon 1 shiv right there, carlos!]
Heh.
For those who object to the development on this site of a WN tendency, here is a brief outline of the steps by which a PUA develops such unpleasant, trigggering attitudes.
1. Wanting to get laid, Beta reads about PUA and mind is awoken to the nature and processes of women. Beta is intrigued.
2. Beta reads Rollo and comes to understand how society has institutionalized hypergamy to ensure resource extraction from betas
3. Beta becomes aware of his role in society as an obedient resouce provider
4. Beta sees how he has been programmed and propagandized to accept his role as resource provider (he puts on his “They Live” spectacles)
5. Beta notes that it is not just women benefitting from his sweat and blood
6. Beta sees that the scheme of programming and propaganda (Rollo’s Feminine Imperative) is managed on a very large scale and applies sophisticated means, far beyond anything women would or could do on their own. That is, the scheme is instututionalized.
7. Beta sees that many specific groups other than just women benefit from the operation of the FI and control its institutions
8. Beta perceives that the interests of these groups are inimical to his own
9. Beta openly objects to being ruled by those who only want to drink his blood
10. Manginas protest that Beta talks like a far-right demagogue
Great comment.
Yes good insight. Have had similar notions of the entry point and pathway of being red pilled and the journey of its digestion.
It starts with basic human need. And for those who truly work at it and start getting laid often it really starts to crack open the lies of the world. To see a meta wide trend in behavior of women that I yielded to exploit for self preservation and sexual gain eventually led me to question it’s source. And so on and so forth.
Going through hardship and overcoming challenges is key to one’s red pill deliverance.
And it’s sad that there is such attack on white males of Christian heritage (not necessarily the dogmatic sense). We can’t be proud of our heritage, our leniage and state truths without being labeled a Nazi or white supremacist. When in all reality we’re the men and the descendents of the men who accept the hard truths and have sacrificed to build greater society.
Feminism is toxic. Diversity is toxic. Fiat banking is toxic. Miscegnation is toxic. Being a pussy beta male is toxic. Not being physically fit is toxic. Not having a moral grounding is toxic. Not knowing the human truths about race, gender and history is toxic. Not reading multiple sources is toxic. Not reading is toxic. All MSM is toxic. Not knowing the above is toxic.
It’s not that CH has evolved into a WN blog or forum or whatever. It’s that RealTalk(TM) attracts the men who can handle the subject matter honestly and hold facts over feelz.
Ironic that we all have to post anonymously for fear that discussing the truth may harm our well being (being doxxed). And it’s ok for lies to be discussed in plain sight on Facebook and national media.
(((Shakinn ma haiiidd)))
Great insight, my development followed the same path. Ironically I was already there as a young teenager from the perspective of white men being the one’s who are truly oppressed.
The red pill has allowed me to see it with far greater clarity and articulate it in a far easier fashion. And you are exactly right that whites and males are not allowed to congregate, and certainly not white males. There can be no doubt that we are in occupied territory.
Feminism is toxic. Diversity is toxic. Fiat banking is toxic. Miscegnation is toxic. Being a pussy beta male is toxic. Not being physically fit is toxic. Not having a moral grounding is toxic. Not knowing the human truths about race, gender and history is toxic. Not reading multiple sources is toxic. Not reading is toxic. All MSM is toxic. Not knowing the above is toxic.
It’s not that CH has evolved into a WN blog or forum or whatever. It’s that RealTalk(TM) attracts the men who can handle the subject matter honestly and hold facts over feelz.
Ironic that we all have to post anonymously for fear that discussing the truth may harm our well being (being doxxed). And it’s ok for lies to be discussed in plain sight on Facebook and national media.
Pro comment. Tip o’ the ten gallon on that one.
Headed for the stars there, Ripp.
“Lineage”
“Miscegenation”
It’s great to be so elite and knowledgeable, isn’t it? So aware and enlightened one has to just shake his head at the foolishness of … all those other people.
@Subway Jared Fogel
As I was saying…
“Not knowing the human truths about race, gender and history is toxic.”
Well put, VD.
I think that most upstanding, normal guys (alpha and beta) have a deep feeling that something is wrong with this current climate. They simply can’t pinpoint the feeling and go through life in an institutional daze. It’s even more depressing when a guy actually gets to point #1 (95% of guys won’t even get that far) and dismisses it because their entire life has been built around an opposing premise.
I agree, Jason. I’m seeing it, sensing it more and more.
Great, great comment. Thank you. #wearenotalone
“Does it matter how many people I’ve slept with?”
How would you reply to this contextual shit test?
[CH: “we’ll see.”]
(Pause, eyes get wide, head rears back momentarily)
“Yikes.” While maintaining eye contact a few seconds, then slowly turn away to face your drink and ignore her while she qualifies herself to you
Id go along with this to find out the truth. Say something like who hasn’t slept with a lot of ppl these days. See if she has a moment of honesty then dump her heh
“…to some people, it might.”
let her squirm a bit and think about it, let her reply.
when she inevitably asks, “does it matter to you”, refer to CHs answer
“Can you count them on your fingers, or do you have to remove your shoes too?”
Won’t work. Never get the truth or if a woman if there’s even a touch of judgement associated with it.
She wants to tell op. Which is not a good thing. Though from a tactical standpoint we should encourage women to be honest about their notch count. Because high notch counts is the new norm lol
There’s the approximate truth method established by what she says and applying a multiplier to it based on your assessment of her sluttiness. 2 to 4 is usually a fair bet as a multiplier.
Alas, yet another jest fallen flat. 😡
Greg it wasn’t a bad joke. It would probably pass the test.
Also, in my experience women get turned on by their own high notch counts. Once they get going they tell all, the key is to act interested and chip in an exploit or two and act like you are getting turned on. They think, falsely, that men and women notch counts mean the same thing. It’s fun to string them along all sorts of info from them while making up excuses not to see them. Lol
I laughed at it too.
This is a good one, because it pseudo-naively presumes the Number is under twenty. Which, for the love of Spaghetti Monster… I .. hope….
1. Some Whites naturally have brown eyes. It is possible to be 100% White and still be brown eyed. Looking only at the White population of my neighborhood, I estimate that 40% have brown eyes.
[CH: don’t have a spergout man. obviously, context matters. if it’s a mystery meat snotmachine the “brown eyes” comment will carry a lot more psychological heft.]
2. I don’t think that mixed race marriage inevitably leads to bad outcomes for children.
[define “bad outcomes”. weird aesthetics? lack of smarts? not feeling an intimate connection with parents who don’t look and act like you?]
Two of my acquaintances are mixed race, and they turned out just fine.
[we believe you.]
One of them even has his mother’s blue eyes. They both look White, and have no visible traces of Colored ancestry. They are both exceedingly well behaved young men, with good educations and decent jobs.
[lucky sevens.]
Some chinamen are actually very good drivers.
How are they at eatin pussy?
Bad outcomes: not attending university,
[CH: too many people are going to college and putting themselves into debt peonage. i wouldn’t call this such a bad thing anymore.]
getting in trouble with the law, having an out of wedlock child, going on welfare, etc.
[not being able to emotionally identify with your parents is a bad thing.]
There are tons of mixed race kids at the better public schools, private schools, and universities in my area.
[tons. coolstorybro.txt]
Most of them turn out just fine.
[there’s more to this earth than is collated in your ses tables.]
I don’t care about aesthetics because ugly is fixable.
[no it’s not. i have yet to see a decent plastic surgery workover that didn’t leave the aging beauty looking more alien than human. the only success stories for converting the ugly to “less ugly” are gastric bypasses and nose jobs.
sometimes you write really stupid shit, sc]
“Having a child who looks similar to me / with my genes”.
I don’t think the world needs another 6’4″ boy with the face of a Balkan Human Trafficker.
Have one then, each him to pass, dribble and shoot a basketball. The world cries out for Euro basketball players with good fundamentals.
All the Dindus can do, is tat up and dunk!
You need to spend a few weeks in downtown Chicago or Baltimore, in one of the more vibrant neighborhoods. Balkan traffickers are high culture in comparison.
[CH: quick story. one time while driving through the deepest jungle ghetto of a major american city i had to slow down for a car accident ahead of me. a battalion of boons had spilled out of an adjacent public housing project and massed along the perimeter of the accident scene to gawk at the carnage. it was the usual harrowing sight of proto-humanoids loping around looking menacing, but one of them stood out from even this crowd of dregs. i’ve never seen anything like it to this day, or before. he was, guessing, in his mid 20s, and his whole head, brow, face, eyes, nose, everything, looked to my eyes like an actual gorilla. hugely prognathic jaw and teeth, triple-wide nose with flaring nostrils you could fit a fist into, skin dark enough to be purple, and an overhanging brow that evoked some primitive missing link. i stared transfixed at this beast, amazed that an ostensibly human race could produce such a throwback.
then i turned on my this american life podcast and soothed myself back into sedation with the lisping incantations of a nice white lady telling me race is a social construct.]
I hazard a guess that the ghetto gorilla may have been the end product of some selective breeding of its recent (semi-human?) ancestors by well meaning slave owners?
“his whole head, brow, face, eyes, nose, everything, looked to my eyes like an actual gorilla”
———————————
should he be killed?
should all gorillas be killed?
[CH: only if they attack unprovoked. otherwise, separation is sufficient.]
CH: Like this?
[CH: even worse.]
Heh, heh… and they accused R. Crumb of hyperbole, go figger.
The original coal burner, all the way back in (ye gods!) 1976,
“Haitian Divorce”, by Steely Dan;
Babs steps out on her new husband with kinky, greasy Charlie…
Tearful reunion in the USA
Day by day those memories fade away
Some babies grow in a peculiar way
It changed, it grew, and everybody knew
Semi-mojo
“Who’s this kinky so-and-so?”
Papa go
Oh – no hesitation
No tears and no hearts breakin’
No remorse
Oh – congratulations
This is your Haitian Divorce
[CH: man, there was so much more realtalk in music before the Age of the Flaming Millennial Faggotry.]
I like Steely Dan, though hadn’t heard this song before. Soon as I play it, it’s got that classic Steely sound.
Lovely!
Royal Scam is probably their weakest album, though it does have this classic, as well my namesake song (“…never gonna do it without the fez on… I wanna be your holy man”) and “Kid Charlemagne”- great song with a great guitar solo by Larry Carlton (like lead singer Donald Fagen, a Tribesman).
There is a shiv that I have kept in my back pocket for quite some time now, waiting to be used at an opportune time.
In the following context, it goes something like this.
Overly entitled and/or strong independent woman starts throwing out the shit tests or engages in shitty behavour to which I respond with something like …
“You know you are really a high value woman, you have looks, a career, you are strong and independent and any man would be incredibly lucky to have you. I understand that you don’t want to settle for just any man. You deserve someone special and you should wait until you find him. Don’t settle for anything less.”
Then I happily walk away and let the hamster spin itself into the stratosphere; with the (I’m hoping) eventual death spiral back to earth and crash into post wall oblivion.
High IQ, without the necessary “soft skills” (the cluster of personality traits, social graces, communication, language, personal habits, interpersonal skills, managing people, leadership, etc. that characterize relationships with other people.), Emotional intelligence or even the drive to work and succeed is no guarantee of a child’s future success in life and career.
Just as amassing a fortune of money is no guarantee that a few generations down there will be anything left of it.
Just saying.
My take on the esteemed dindus is that they’re not really human. That’s not prejudice but from observing the african guests of our esteemed regime. The females are, by default, queens of the social office; the makes are by default recipients of the good grace$ of the regime who pass their time by standing at street corners or pushing drugs and molesting womynz (they’re all crazed for white pussy).
I’ve noticed lately that almost nobody speaks with them who must not.
BTW I’ve had my gorilla experience like the one related by CH, but with females.
I live in the EU.
Poland?
well technically they’re human but one of my more odd speculations is that genetic adaptations to the pill could adjust the reproductive pathway in more pill-using populations (whites), but leave it unmolested in those who don’t use the pill (blacks), which could essentially fork the species, leaving races unable to impregnate one another. its kinda weirdo science fiction shit. but life finds a way: if you flush contraception through many generations, the population must adapt or meet genetic death, its what we do. Genetic mutations to cervical mucus or sperm acrosome are the most likely pathways.
Darwin thought blacks were a different sub-species. I don’t think they are truly human like us.
I’ve lived this – late 30’s widow, hard 8, smokin’ hot former head cheerleader who could still wear her high school clothes. After falling for her she revealed that there were 3 mochas. But hey, I’m not racist… And she was truly amazing. The hottest, nicest, most feminine, most fun, awesome in bed, perfect in every way and we enjoyed several years of outrageous good times. But her oldest son was a complete a$$, and based on every report he was just like his dead father – an angry, angry man who had everything and still seethed. Daddy couldn’t keep a job more than 6 months or a year before getting fired, usually for a full chimp rage explosion at customers or coworkers for some imagined slight. If alive he’d be a ringer for the POS that capped those two reporters last week. His son has the same entitled, chip-on-his-shoulder, spoiled, rage filled for no reason, … in spite of the fact that he is very bright and has a too forgiving and loving extended family. Even without affirmative action this kid could go places. The final straw was when first spawn threatened to kill everyone and burn the house down – and I believed him. Don’t ignore the obvious – genes matter and I unlinked my future from this smoldering powderkeg. I feel bad for her as the mochas probably cost her at least 5 points. She’s only dated low SMV white trash dirtballs since. She made a huge mistake and is suffering the lifelong consequences. In another timeline she’d be a Porsche driving perky tennis racket carrying pampered Housewife of Orange County. Now she’s alone, struggling financially, and her residual SMV is quickly evaporating. Lesson to the light skinned ladies : one way or another, chocolate baby daddy won’t stick around. And when you reenter the SMP, you won’t be able to give it away.
Whenever I see a brown baby with a white mother, I like to say” Awww, it looks just like you.” Then I leave. They are always dumbfounded and I always have a better day whenever this happens.
Back some seven years ago when we had regular black commenters here, there were whole comment sub-threads by da brothas about gittin’ da white wommin. One particularly unpleasant, passive-aggressive Talented Tenth regular once wrote that b/w mixed people are better looking than pure-race people of eother race. I responded with “they are?”
He took it very personally, and wrote many comments here and elsewhere about how I’m a limited thinker, or something.
That’s known as “hitting a raw nerve”.
You haven’t the faintest idea how droll your comment is.
Hey, as long as the jest doesn’t fall flat. 😉
Greg, you’re an insidious mofo.
TT was 50% correct. B/W people are often better looking than one of their parents.
Touche’.
For a moment, I thought you said ‘BBW people’
Why did the black commenters leave?
Well, at least one of them was a: half-black and b: a troll. He apparently got tired of an impersonator mocking him constantly. Another one (Nicole?) is still here, although not posting as much. Are you black? Are you willing to replace thwack/james blonde/whiteboy?
There were also the Great Obsidian Wars of 2009. Various Talented Tenth commenters felt a paradigm shift from an accommodating one to identitarian, a vanguard of larger lagging cultural shifts.
bc there’s no fat chicks here
They couldn’t hang intellectually and we got tired of their obsession with screwing our women when they have nothing to trade. They don’t really have anything to offer. I don’t care anymore. I’m done with them too. They’re just YKWs pitbulls.
they are still here
They still be here, sho’ nuff… jes’ not so talented.
Curious
Why did the black commenters leave?
————————————————————–
1. Quality of white posters dropped
2. Black posters heavily moderated by CH (there is more than one CH)
3. Epic levels of white butthurt when you score on them.
To sum up; the entire site has become a tiresome white male pep rally no different to the silly “pro black” blogs
[CH:
4. the black commenters (taking their word that they are black) didn’t get the feedback they were hoping their low effort trolling would inspire.
5. they never left and this is a concern troll giving it one last college try.]
We left because we felt suckered into what looked like a debate, but was really just a circle jerk of self pity.
As long as there is a conversation to be had, we can take a bit of “white pride” because it makes as much or as little sense as nurturing pride for any other accident of birth. There’s a point though, when you know the lights are on, but nobody’s home. That’s when the blogger reveals that he (or they) is just as fucked in the head as some commenters you thought you were protecting the blog’s integrity against.
We have jokes about an addiction to encouraging “white” people. None of us wants to be that joke.
At least he opposed Obama.
Seriously though, I remember him throwing a hissy fit because CH used the term “Talented Tenth”, because, paraphrasing, it is a word that was used in the early 1900s. Apparently, that bans it from modern usage.
Weird.
I take credit for reviving the term “Talented Tenth.” I wrote a couple of mini-essays on that subject at Chuck’s now-closed blog.
I always sort of liked O. I took him on his terms. It was the contemptible Talented Tenth I saved my sharpest shiv for.
Is it really a “tenth?”
My observations tell me it’s more like a tenth of a tenth, or 1%.
Talented 1%.
Unless of course “talented” is to mean an ‘affirmative action’ talented where blacks acting normal enough to be in white society are ‘talented’. Which would mean ~10%.
So talented they can hold a job, pay bills and not commit crime.
Aw, you guys are much too niggardly… my personal experience is the pan-racial 80-20 rule… about 20% of them are tolerable… and about 20% of us ain’t.
America is the most racist country, those in denial are probably white. Until you experience it you have no right to dismiss it!
And yet most people here fetishize Asian women and mixed race kids and Asian women do the exact same thing to their kids despite the damage it causes to our psyches.
reddit.com/r/hapas
No wonder why women are so inscrutable to men. They employ doublespeak when using such straightforward words like Beautiful to describe ugly mixed race children. The way to get around this is to read the context of the situation rather than her words directly.
Pro comment… ‘though I will say, this sort of subterfuge can be painful at times, for men… leastwise White men… by nature wish to be forthright.
Well, it is like the Southern Belle saying “bless her heart …” which is a Southern comforting phrase, which is actually a shiv.
Devils Advocate: White women like Jessica Alba (horrified on George Lopez’s show to learn she’s ~80% White mixture) boast of their “beautiful brown babies.” How much of White women adopting African Babies and having mixed race kids is a function of religious approval for non-Whites and religious hatred for White Men? Clearly White women are far more beautiful, objectively, than non-White women. Desire for social/religious approval?
Jessica Alba ain’t white. She may be a cute mischling, but she ain’t white.
Next question.
Race-mixing is a tricky proposition from a White person’s perspective. For brevity of the argument, assuming a mix between White and Black/Latino partners.
The standardized-test score gap between White children and those of other ethnicities persists despite a few decades-worth of efforts to equalize opportunities for learning. Non-White children lag behind by a considerable margin that has stopped shrinking a long time ago. It is virtually certain at this point that innate genetic differences are largely responsible for the gap.
Whites are smarter on average so race-mixing will usually be detrimental to the chances of a White person’s offspring of partaking in forming future elites. Demographic trends suggest that Whites will comprise a diminishing percentage of the overall population in favor of other ethnicities. As this process continues, the unique intelligence of Whites will be more and more scarce, and therefore highly in-demand. That’s where a pure White appearance will be a big advantage; bigger even than the innate IQ superiority would indicate.
The White European aesthetic, behavioral and physical, is the result of a few thousand years of specialized, highly circumstantial selection for exquisitely refined traits that exist nowhere else in the world.
That is just pure gold, right there.
I came 5 times just reading it.
Oh, boy – just saw a social media post with someone with her now-grown clearly-adopted daughter.
Second comment: “She’s beautiful.” 8-|
(She really wasn’t beautiful. Happy? Yes. A nice person? Probably. But nowhere near beautiful.)
This is like how the hivemind has decided that men who pose together for pictures after plumbing each others assholes are ‘cute.’ Yeah, that’s ‘cute.’
Its always Opposite Day for the feminine mind.
“I don’t like assholes” means “I want to fuck an asshole”
“He’s a nice guy” means “I would rather severe my femoral artery than touch his jizz”
“I like a guy with a sense of humor” means “I like this guy, therefore he has a sense of humor”
“Guys who won’t date me because of X are insecure” means “Guys won’t date me, so I’m insecure about X”
“I think we should be friends” means “If I ever talk to you again, it is going to be about my problems, so you can validate me.”
“It just happened” means “I was itching for it from the moment I saw him”
“I don’t hang out with other girls because they’re bitches” means “other girls don’t hang out with me because I’m a bitch”
“He is a douche/dudebro/jerk” means “He is cool but I’m not hot enough to get him to fuck me”
“Rape culture is a serious problem!” means “it is a serious problem that nobody wants to rape me”
“You’re just intimidated by a strong independent woman!” means “I’m intimidated by sweet, dependent younger women who get men’s attention”
It goes on. The point is the OPPOSITE must be loudly proclaimed if the truth would damage a woman’s social acceptance, or if it would damage her ego.
Beautiful, just beautiful.
Good stuff — you’ve got the beginnings of a gina-translator right there.
No “PC” (narrative control) quota Africans in this photo, or on this entire website, probably because it’s still owned by the family that owned it in 1446: The Earl and Countess of Rosslyn.
http://www.rosslynchapel.com/learning/
#winning. Is this the key? Who is Dan Brown? Does he have something real to teach us, as Tolkien and his friend, C.S. Lewis, did?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._R._R._Tolkien
Tolkien served as the Rawlinson and Bosworth Professor of Anglo-Saxon and Fellow of Pembroke College, Oxford, from 1925 to 1945.
Does Harvard currently have any Professor of Anglo-Saxon?
He was at one time a close friend of C. S. Lewis—they were both members of the informal literary discussion group known as the Inklings. Tolkien was appointed a Commander of the Order of the British Empire by Queen Elizabeth II on 28 March 1972.
http://www.thisblogisdangerous.com
To CH & readers:
Tangential question about “social etiquette” in the workplace –
Context/background: in San Francisco. Office a SWPL mecca. One co-worker in particular – unmarried, childless, 37-38 y.o., BUT slender/petite, etc. Not a bad face. When made up can deceive many a beta but would be an alpha fling given age /post-wall and general ditziness. But overall a very nice, warm, friendly woman – at least in the office no drama, no outbursts, no tankgrll / feminist propaganda, no pent-up bitterness. She so not SWPL. No Trader Joes hummus stuff. Upon appearance looks like the typical attractive Latina in the tight skirt. But she’s a Flip.
No intention of hitting on her. Work & age-related reasons.
She definitely seems the type to have ridden the carousel in her twenties. She was briefly involved with making clubby music albums.
She’s a self-proclaimed cougar – says she’s attracted ONLY to younger men. Her current bf is 30, Hispanic, and faux-mohawked with a tat.
She’s also loudly proclaimed in the office that she’s baby-crazy. Telling people she’s obsessed with baby names, wanting a child, etc. I think one time she wanted to name some inanimate object her child etc.
Anyway –
Ex-coworker drops by to visit last friday. Brings with him his 13-month son. NOTE: this ex-coworker’s tenure predates the arrival of the baby crazy girl above. So it’s the first time these two have ever met. They’re otherwise strangers.
In the conference room: Slaps on the back, hey what’s up long time no hear, what have you been up to, etc. go around.
I say a brief hello and return to work because: 1. I’m not the boss & 2: I’ve got actual work to do at work.
This female coworker stays the entire time in the conference room, listening to this ex coworker whom she’s just met talk and catch up for an hour, sitting the closest to him and the child, staring and transfixed. She later brings the little boy a plush animal to play and then later on carries him about in her arms.
Because my desk is just outside the conference room I witness this entire series of events unfold.
The father doesn’t object. I suppose my SWPL enclave might flip out if he freaked out, who knows. Plus the stranger is a woman, right? Some corollary to the fundamental premise…? Because if it were a strange man transfixed and holding the baby…..
I did briefly worry that baby-crazy girl wouldn’t give back the boy. Seriously.
No one except me noticed this – game principles abounding…
My question is: is it me? Or is her behavior socially inappropriate? Does it violate some etiquette? She doesn’t know this old coworker at all. Never worked with him. And now she’s going around carrying the baby and acting out her frustrated/thwarted maternal instincts?
I feel perhaps I’m alone in this but I thought it was an embarrassing spectacle. I felt on her behalf pathetic and desperate.
N.B.: I don’t have anything against this woman – she’s nice and warm and otherwise an oasis in the feminist/SWPL/transgender etc. capital of the world.
http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2015/08/david-oyelowo-james-bond
What the fuck…
Simplicity of the ad…so beautiful.
I love it. Needs more than 3 examples though, I hope that’s a first draft. It could be punched up a lot.
Agreed. I’m wondering if they mainly did it to see Jebe retaliate, which appears to be working.
Just get Jebe to open his mouth and he’ll do himself in.
Seems to me that natural-selection has a way of getting quite a few panties in a bunch. On a certain level, I trust Darwin knows best.
Oh wow… you mean that whites ALSO commit crimes, on occasion?
Thanks for bringing that to our attention… disingenuous ass.
If you’re going to piss in the weeds with the big dogs, bring something pertinent to the field. Quote some probabilities, based upon race… especially when it’s white-on-black versus black-on-white.
Otherwise, well… STFU, buttmunch.
[CH: these shitlibs are really out to lunch if they think these stale tactics are gonna fly here at the chateau.]
There’s plenty more….
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2646432/12-year-old-Wisconsin-girls-stab-friend-19-times.html
I don’t care what color somebody’s skin is…if they do the crime, they do the time. End of story.
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2013.xls
“I don’t care what color somebody’s skin is…if they do the crime, they do the time. End of story.”
THAT comment should clearly go under, “Things cuckservatives say”!!!
[CH: done.]
…bring something pertinent to the field…
Vester told me that references to “fields” are racist. Also “swinging.”
Duly noted… I wouldn’t want anyone thinking I was less than compassionate to the plight of our other-color-brothers.
When your fighting over who gets to supply White-America with it’s weekend-party-drugs, it has a tendency to get quite bloody.
[CH: drug use is rampant in the ghetto. i believe when you break down the numbers, all drug use is disproportionately higher among blacks and amerindians.]
Drug use ( just what the doctor ordered) is just as rampant in White-America. The difference is, whites can afford rehab and blacks can not.
No one here cares.
Why?
Look at this fucking shibboleth.
When your fighting over who gets to supply White-America with it’s weekend-party-drugs, it has a tendency to get quite bloody.
Ah, that’s your new tack? Muh Dope?
(((shakin’ it)))
Tell you what, Sambo II… if negro claim to fame for “hanging around” White society is that you’ll supply drugs, well… take you and your White customers for a ride on Perdition Road.
You fairy.
Drug use ( just what the doctor ordered) is just as rampant in White-America. The difference is, whites can afford rehab and blacks can not.
Yeah, that’s the only difference. :large duckface
Sambo’s been watching reruns of Traffic and believes it’s a documentary. lzozlzozlzozlozlozlozl
Damage controll? Come on.
Perhaps like this…
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAcQjRxqFQoTCK618LfL1McCFYguiAodHSoGjA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nairaland.com%2F1575585%2Fsome-worlds-ugliest-men-images&psig=AFQjCNF2bR7yBbIIELNIHwDx42fGsalPjA&ust=1441153833336030
Oooops…..
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3217508/Killer-admits-shot-dead-three-people-Jewish-sites-end-genocide-against-white-people-Jews.html
Don’t ban me bro! Don’t ban me!
Western Shivilization
Well, it didn’t take long for news, related to this topic, to come out. However it comes with a bizarre, shiv-tastic twist, courtesy of the Daily Mail:
“Court dismisses white lesbian mother’s lawsuit after she was mistakenly given a black man’s sperm donation”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3223365/Mother-s-lawsuit-mistaken-sperm-donation-dismissed.html
Jennifer Cramblett became pregnant in December 2011 through artificial insemination using sperm donated by a black man instead of the white donor whom she and her partner, Amanda Zinkon, selected. So she sued the sperm bank for wrongful birth.
Cramblett, who looks quite butch, says she loves her baby but she said that she was raised around stereotypical attitudes toward minorities and that she has ‘limited cultural competency’ with African-Americans.
In other words, she’s terrible at braiding hair.
Don’t you love it when an equalist’s hypocrisy is exposed for all to see?
On a the bright side, doesn’t the daughter she gave birth to look so….beautiful?