Feed on
Posts
Comments

COTW winner is artistoftheslightlyshadydeal, who writes about the devolution of marriage:

“some experts say boundary-challenging gay relationships represent an evolution in marriage — one that might point the way for the survival of the institution.”

To survive as only a plaything of the legal profession.

It will also encourage women to scheme of ways to rework the marriage contract when they feel like to get 50 shades of dick on the side and bail out of their responsibilities in the partnership.

“I married him, but I never agreed to the reverse cowgirl or to be monogamous”

“I married him but I never agreed to wash the stains out of his children’s underwear”

Marriage will evolve all right, into a dicey proposition at best unless you have money to pay for the right contract to protect yourself from evolution or change you do not want.

Pre-nuptial agreements almost become mandatory to record promises made at the beginning. But it’s a band aid on gaping wound. As soon as marriages have porous boundaries then you may as well each just retain lawyers and start a limited liability company.

“50 shades of dick” lol

I’ve used this analogy before, and I’ll use it again, because I think it’s pertinent: A wife getting fat is reneging on her end of the marital deal just as assuredly as a husband lounging on the sofa all the time doing nothing is reneging on his. Both of them have turned their backs on what the other spouse desires from them.

Gay marriage has cracked open the door to the legalistic flim-flam divorce sham machine that much wider. This commenter is correct. Enlarging the purview of marriage to include all sorts of “arrangements” and “agreements” and “evolutions” and “fluid expectations” will essentially turn the institution into a loveless business partnership, and all that requires. May as well jump to the next step and avoid the wait: Contractual, time-limited marriages that can be renewed every few years based on client satisfaction.

******

COTW runner-up is Ras al Ghul, who spells out the final solution for the institution of marriage.

The real social danger, is what they’re [ed: gay marriage advocates] pushing, acceptance of open marriage.

Getting the betas to accept their women sleeping around (because they’re beta they’re not going to have the opportunity the women have).

The problem, and its a very real on is that the only incentive left for beta men to get married is the illusion that they are locking the girl down.

You take that illusion away and what possible reason do they have to get married and work hard?

None. Your married, hard working married slave boys are your revenue generators for your tax base and economy, Dalrock has that delineated out clearly. Single men, single women and married women have a small percentage of individuals that make a high income.

Married men are more likely to make more, work more.

They’ve erode marriage so far, I’m sure they think this won’t matter, but in the places where gay marriage is legalized the marriage rate drops faster for this very reason.

There will always be men that think they’re special snowflakes and that they’re relationship will be different, but that number of fools is already getting smaller.

Social acceptance and legal codification of open marriage will be the killing shiv twist in the black heart of the West. There will be no turning back from that paradigm shift. Hello, Afrimerica.

139 Responses to “Comment Of The Week: A Limited Loveability Company”

  1. […] Comment Of The Week: A Limited Loveability Company […]

  2. Tilikum says:

    I for one, look forward to more drone behavior by the average Western/American man.

    Current gender dynamics resemble animal husbandry for the proficient male.

    I’ll seed em’, you boys feed em.

    • Arbiter says:

      Tilikum shows up for some empty chest beating as usual. The old fatty only uses the forum for baseless bragging about himself with nothing to contribute, as shown in his intense hatred of women – because they won’t touch him with a ten-foot pole. “A WOMAN IS NOT A HUMAN BEING!” “A WOMAN IS NOT A PERSON!” He’s an idiot.

      He has that, and his worship of non-Whites. Come on freak, tell us that knowing more than you do – that’s most people – means believing in “conspiracy theories!”. Then go back into hiding, like you always do.

      • Tilikum says:

        Are you in love w/ me or ?

        Gettin’ creepy.

      • Arbiter says:

        Poor Tilikum has nothing to say as usual. LOL You really can’t argue. I know you hate it when your words come back to haunt you, freak. You can’t stand up for them.

      • VRW says:

        im pretty sure tilik has cited his height and weight several times which is gay in and of itself and everytime its been different numbers

      • johncorvus says:

        He’s totally right, though

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Arbeit-Macht-Freier: Talmudikim is YKW. Anything that he “wants” for “Western/American” people is always with a view towards annihilating and eradicating them.

      • King A says:

        This knee-jerk ad hom isn’t just girly, it’s ruining your credibility, such as it is. I would like to know why it is good and proper to hate this fellow, but you provide nothing but frowny faces and heckling fart noises. Like we should all know your hissy history with him. When handled the right way, you can learn more from your enemies than from friends. You can approach even nemeses in good faith, man.

        In any event, you provide no substantive objection to his claims. Just random sounds.

    • llllooooolllzzzzzlllolll says:

      Youre not seeding anyone. Theres no doubt in my mind you dont get pussy. If im wrong, and you are, theyre nothing but barpigs with foot tatoos and leg stubble.

    • Lolzzzz.ticklecum showing his face and trying to be ‘badass’ again.

      I find the fact his avatar is a historic UK corporate lackey fairly fitting.

      • Tilikum says:

        20 paragraph droning blog posts full of brainsmoke nerdspeak that explain your views to a world in the hopes of feeling understood and……wait for it…an anime lover to boot!

        You and Arbiter should get a room 🙂

    • King A says:

      “Cuckold” is the better word. And enjoy it while you can. It won’t last long before goatish sprites skipping from barnyard to barnyard are gathered in from the free range and given the Peter Abelard treatment for seminal incontinence.

      We are the descendants of the marauders and rapists. White men have so thoroughly made the world its bitch and kept her, that for generations we haven’t even had to try. Generations slept soundly on the watch for lack of outside challenge — rather we made war on ourselves for sport. We have dominated by echo for centuries. The scavengers can go after many things, but they can’t plunder our baby baskets for very long before they see how cold the bluest eye can be.

      We make cruelty into poetry when need demands:

      http://shakespeare.mit.edu/henryv/henryv.3.3.html

      • Tilikum says:

        KA I don’t like it, just merely play the hand I’m dealt. There is no honor here (holistically), and a realignment of values to the old ways is a useless sacrifice…..right this moment.

        It’s all about understanding the terrain in which you operate. Complacency kills, not adaptability.

        I mean, look at all the weird fuckheads around here focused on Joos and nigs in every comment. Who cares? Build something and stop bitchin’ you losers. (not you Matt)

      • Anonymous says:

        …??…AT LEAST U ADMIT U CRACKERS R DEMONS….US COLORED OF THE WORLD WILL HAVE SOOOOOOO MUCH FUN RAPING YOUR WOMEN IN FRONT OF U,AS THE MOORS DID 4 CENTURIES…ASIANS/SLAVS(THE ONLY WHITES WHO WILL BE LEFT..THEY ALMOST COLORED ANYWAYS..)FROM THE EAST,INDIANS/ARABS FROM THE SOUTH EAST,AFRICANS/LATINOS FROM THE WEST & SOUTH…..OBAMA BOUT 2 BRING THE PAIN…BYE BYE LEPEROUS DEMONS…

  3. […] Comment Of The Week: A Limited Loveability Company […]

  4. Captain Obvious says:

    BRISTOL PALIN AND DAKOTA MEYER ANNOUNCE ENGAGEMENT… Dakota is a former member of the U.S. Marine Corp. Highly decorated for his service, he is the recipient of both the Medal of Honor and the Purple Heart among many other military honors… http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3267857/posts

  5. natural resources says:

    This is too hilarious not to pass on – pick up advice from a tranny:

    http://www.sophiagubb.com/how-to-get-girls/

    Shivs away!

  6. Captain Obvious says:

    ARMY MAJOR SENTENCED TO 20 YEARS AFTER EXPOSING POLITICAL CORRECTNESS RUN AMOK IN THE MILITARY… The JAGs own female investigative officer – LTC Jessica Halling – not only found the major’s accuser – his estranged wife – was “untruthful” and “embellished” her charges, but recommended at the Article 32 (preliminary) hearing that the case NOT proceed to court-martial… http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3267868/posts

  7. DirkJohanson says:

    Betas would have plenty of opportunity to sleep around if prostitution was legal, yet another fact illustrating just how important that issue is for men.

  8. Joe says:

    I used to think it was about gay acceptance but I’m starting to think it’s about destroying traditional society.

    • Captain Obvious says:

      > “I’m starting to think it’s about destroying traditional society”

      Welcome to the Dark Enlightenment. Know yourself. And know your enemies.

    • Ya Think? says:

      I used to think it was about thug acceptance but I’m starting to think it’s about me being robbed at gunpoint.

      I used to think it was about smoke acceptance but I’m starting to think it’s about my house burning down.

      I used to think it was about lumpy, black mole acceptance but I’m starting to think I’m dying of malignant melanoma.

      I used to think it was about pedophilia disorder acceptance but I’m starting to think it’s about them becoming able to legally rape my kids.

      I used to think it was about cesium-137 acceptance but I’m starting to think it’s about a fatal dose of radiation poisoning.

    • Yep, because if it was ‘love’ what about young girls, or pologamy?

    • SC says:

      rightwingers think that anything they personally dislike is going to destroy traditional society. leftwingers think that nothing is going to destroy society, or they want to destroy society themselves.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        And then leftwingers pose as sheep-in-wolves’-clothing libertardians, like “SC”, in false-flag operations designed to give the appearance of undercutting The Right from within. It’s why YKW needed Alisa Rosenbaum to clean up the loose ends which Karl Marx had missed.

      • Captain Obvious says:

      • King A says:

        The RIght dislike things because they corrode society. “Personal” has nothing to do with it. Otherwise they couldn’t care less and want to be left alone. You don’t see the Amish lobbying DC to ban electricity.

        We would like nothing more for the coasts to GRIDS themselves into doomsday and fall off into the ocean in a writhing mass of twinkling brownflesh. The problem is collateral damage to the institutions which sustain us and our progeny. The Left doesn’t just want to masturbate themselves to death, they want to bring the whole world with them. It’s a massive, flaming, sybaritic ego trip. A cultural suicide bombing. They can’t manage virtue so they set themselves against virtue, satisfied only by its destruction.

        But I, that am not shaped for sportive tricks,
        Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;
        I, that am rudely stamp’d, and want love’s majesty
        To strut before a wanton ambling nymph;
        I, that am curtail’d of this fair proportion,
        Cheated of feature by dissembling nature,
        Deformed, unfinish’d, sent before my time
        Into this breathing world, scarce half made up,

        And that so lamely and unfashionable
        That dogs bark at me as I halt by them;
        Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace,
        Have no delight to pass away the time,
        Unless to spy my shadow in the sun
        And descant on mine own deformity:
        And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover,
        To entertain these fair well-spoken days,
        I am determined to prove a villain

        At the bottom of CultMarx is an inexhaustible well of ressentiment.

        Matt

      • JironGhrad says:

        I have to agree with Matt King here on this. Should be pretty self-evident, if you stop and look around.

      • James Blonde says:

        I think I agree with him too even though I don’t understand what the fuck he said.

        It just sounds so eloquent and thoughtful that I guess it must be true.

  9. burke says:

    there’s a gene wolfe book ‘home fires’ that deals with (i think pretty presciently) where things are headed. the men and women in time-defined, money-centric relationships are ‘contracto’ and ‘contracta’ and the world is intensely legalistic about everything. a lot of other things that are likely to come to pass or are worth pondering, and it’s a gene wolfe book so it’s great anyway.

  10. James Blonde says:

    The Nazi party was dominated by homosexuals.

    Ernst Rohm founded the SA which administered beatdowns to get Hitler elected.

    • Mr.magNIFicent1 says:

      ykw

    • Greg Eliot says:

      A handful of fags did not dominate the NSDAP.

      And a few long knives took care of that issue, when it became one.

      I’m sure if you go to any gym today you will always find a few fellows who like to do nothing better than kick ass and Haynes graze.

      • James Blonde says:

        Greg Eliot
        .

        And a few long knives took care of that issue, when it became one.
        —————————————————————————————

        You just proved my point.

        And no “long knives” could remove the homoeroticism that lay at the core of National Socialism.

        Don’t get defensive Greg

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Actually, I didn’t make your point for you… unless that was a pun about long knives, in which case, droll.

        Taking care of a small faction of queers who threatened to upend the apple cart doesn’t mean said faction was dominant… it only means the truly dominant members eradicated upstarts.

        And for the record, when you spout your usual nonsense, someone stepping in to correct your n1663r-babble isn’t being defensive… it’s keeping the record straight for the numbnuts who believe the first thing they read.

        You fairy.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        And no “long knives” switchblades could remove the homoeroticism that lay at the core of National Socialism down-low ghetto culture.

        FIFY lzlzozlzozlzozlzozlozlozl

      • James Blonde says:

        Don’t get upset Greg; you can hate the game without hating the players.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Usual non sequitur n1663r-babble…

        … just man up and say “gots nuthin’”.

      • James Blonde says:

        The National Socialism arose out of a macho homosexual subculture long-incubating in Germany that idealized warriorship (The mannerbund) and homosexual pederasty. (Male sex with younger males.) The evidence of this is overwhelming, and has been suppressed in order to protect the homosexual agenda currently sweeping the western world.

      • King A says:

        Revisionist historian queens have forever attempted to reinterpret utterly asexual bonds of brotherhood into sordid sodomite fantasy. It is a manifestation of their own personal dysfunction: the thorough confusion of esprit de corps with erotic desire. (And it’s not gay men who cannot make the distinction — because they must live it — so much as the bicurious professoriat which conjures up poofter theory.)

        Suggest to any normal man that he found his military experience the least bit sexually arousing, and he will beat you to the ground in a decidedly non-homoerotic way for interjecting faggot solipsism into a sacred, life-or-death ethos.

      • PA says:

        Vox Day’s hierarchy is very helpful for understanding male relationships. Camaraderie is a Delta and Beta quality. The homo shit is Lambda.

      • PA says:

        The hierarchy: http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2011/03/socio-sexual-hierarchy.html

        The original post is from 2011. In recent weeks, he’s finessed the subject. Deltas are the basic level of normal men, honest with themselves about who they are, and capable of friendship and camaraderie. They both get and give respect to other men.

        The Gamma a low-status man with high-status ambitions but lack of drive or charisma to be a Beta or Alpha. At his worst he is an effeminate SJW with delusions of superiority. Men rightly dislike him, compounding his frustration and anger.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        If my reply ever gets out of limbo, let it be my last word on the subject to this insufferable n1663r.

      • King A says:

        Yeah, I made the mistake of writing n1663r in non-Leet characters (twice!) and that post now resides among the last souls in purgatory. Stay tuned, though, it’s worth the wait as always!

    • King A says:

      You know that “blonde” is the feminine form of “blond,” right?

  11. Hey guys on topic here, I got a 19y/o I routinely smash completely, I got her v-card and turned her into a complete sub, it was more of a experiment to see if I could, but the major problem is she lacks energy/spark. She has a lot going, in that I told her to lose weight- she did, I told her to start going to the gym, to practice sex tricks etc and she did it all.

    Anyone with experience of a girl that listens completely (a great thing) but lacks much energy/fun? She’s in the rotation, but its unusual how much she bends to my will…but lacks the fun some others have.

    • Start dictating what shoes or blouse she will wear and how she wears them. Spank her if she gets them wrong.

    • > “lacks much energy/fun”

      EK, in all honesty, she sounds like she might be mentally ill and/or the victim of child abuse. Something is off in her. Be careful. You don’t want a suicide attempt on your hands. Two questions: 1) Is she completely frigid, or can she orgasm for you? 2) How is her IQ? Is she simply dumb, or is she smart but boring? I have dated several smart but boring & frigid chicks over the years.

      • King A says:

        Mentally ill? Wut.

        Unless you are trying to say that peak femininity is somehow a form of mental illness.

      • Oh, she can cum super easy, pretty smart too. Mostly just boring.

      • King A says:

        “Boring” is a word losers use to conceal their social deficiencies. It’s a key concept to the Millennials’ sad, immature defense of themselves.

        Nothing is boring that your attitude or approach does not make so, especially in relation to the limited capacities of women, let alone maturing girls. But the millennial pajama boy is incapable of taking responsibility for anything, least of all himself, and so he is always looking for some abstraction or someone to pass blame to.

        Addiction to stimulation means the incapacity to be alone with one’s thoughts. Silence produces anxiety. The quiet company of another person is as horrific to contemplate as watching them bleed to death.

        The problem isn’t the lack of FUN in the world or in other people. The problem is you.

        “I am never bored anywhere. Being bored is an insult to oneself.” — Jules Renard

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “Oh, she can cum super easy, pretty smart too. Mostly just boring.”

        Okay, this doesn’t make any sense at all. She’s smart, she does whatever you ask her to do, and she cums for you? That chick sounds like wife material, man. I honestly don’t get it. Do you WANT her to go all Cluster-B on your ass, and make things more “interesting”?

    • FredMertz says:

      Stop picking up girls as they get off the little yellow bus?

    • King A says:

      I … turned her into a complete sub … but the major problem is she lacks energy/spark. She has a lot going, in that I told her to lose weight- she did, I told her to start going to the gym, to practice sex tricks etc and she did it all.

      So you remodeled a high performance sports car and now you expect it to fuel itself too? It’s your job to change out the plugs and fill it with gas. Regularly scheduled maintenance.

      The problem with women that age is their high school ideas of “fun.” Manic Pixie Dream Girls are for confused and half-finished men. If she were truly submissive she would figure out how to please you with the appropriate energy levels. But a low-burn female at that age is a great gift. They otherwise are tempted to expend their excess excitability on self-destructive busywork.

      • James Blonde says:

        and twerking

      • 88 says:

        “The problem with women that age is their high school ideas of “fun.””

        yeah well. you can’t expect much more than that when you consider that a 19 year old isn’t even a woman yet. other than their physical development, girls that age are still children in every sense of the word.

        it’s a shame that mother nature puts these young girls in such a vulnerable state by giving them adult women’s bodies before they are emotionally and intellectually prepared to handle them.

        [CH: girls fully mature physically and emotionally much earlier than do boys.]

  12. Have the feminists outright stated this yet? Some of them are so slutty I’d be surprised if they didn’t see monogamy itself as a form of “oppression”. If they haven’t said it already, I’m sure they’d all like the “right” to sleep with men other than their husbands.

    “How dare you try to control a woman’s body!” is what these arrogant “liberated” females will say. “That’s rape culture!!!”

    No longer will it be about a boyfriend simply telling his girlfriend not to dress slutty in public. She’ll be demanding the right to BE slutty (in public and with other men).

    Has anyone seen the new feminist Web site “herself.com”? It features several women (and one more was just added the other day) who seem to think public female nudity is “empowering”. But one of them really takes it to the extreme. She’s a porn star who does double penetration scenes. That’s like literally cheating on two guys at the same time.

    • Carlos Danger says:

      If you’re a woman, just come out and say so.

    • Domain Name: HERSELF.COM
      Registry Domain ID: 999022_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
      Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.enom.com
      Registrar URL: http://www.enom.com
      Updated Date: 2015-02-17T01:10:14.00Z
      Creation Date: 1998-03-19T05:00:00.00Z
      Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2016-03-18T04:00:00.00Z
      Registrar: ENOM, INC.
      Registrar IANA ID: 48
      Registrar Abuse Contact Email: ***.*******@gmail.com
      Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.**************
      Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
      Registry Registrant ID:
      Registrant Name: THOMAS KENTELL
      Registrant Organization: –
      Registrant Street: 55 GREEN LANE
      Registrant City: CHICHESTER
      Registrant State/Province: WEST SUSSEX
      Registrant Postal Code: PO197NT
      Registrant Country: GB

    • elmer says:

      Feminists say “fucking” a lot.

      And the women who advocate public nudity are never the ones you would actually want to see in the nude.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I glanced at “herself.com” and it looked like a lot of post-Wall and even post-Menopausal spinsters. Poor girls. Nothing but Histrionic Personality Disorder nude modelling to relieve the boredom of feeding all those d@mned cats.

  13. Corsair says:

    CH, many of your Twitter links in the sidebar are broken.

    • Captain Obvious says:

      My impression is that the WordPress software backend is both broken and getting buggier all the time. Either WordPress has outsourced their code maintenance to Bangalore, or else Kevin Conboy from Colorado is seriously f*cking with us.

    • Tilikum says:

      not broken, just appended. Hit the twitter page and they are complete.

  14. Captain Obvious says:

    ARE YOU RAISING A NARCISSIST? …The study shows that efforts to raise a child’s self-esteem with heaps of praise may actually be raising levels of narcissism instead… And we’re failing to teach empathy, she says, adding that a lack of empathy is associated with narcissism… http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3268085/posts

  15. Putin says:

    TIP OF THE MONTH

    Don’t know what was in the air yesterday but the flirty women were out in force.
    Anyways there was a particular gal who was giving me IOI at the store. I decided to put my hand out like I was doing a business handshake and say “hello, my name is —–.” Her response was absolutely classic and what it always is when I do this procedure. Face brightens and she puts her hand out, as I shake her hand she melts like butter. It has never failed. I learned this from an very, very unique gal in college.
    So give it a try the next time you are out as you may be surprised how something so formal and mundane can act as a love potion.

  16. kfg says:

    ” . . . you may as well each just retain lawyers and start a limited liability company.”

    That’s already the case in NYS, where prenups are not recognized, but civil contracts between cohabitants are.

  17. anon dudebro says:

    Just returned from the gym, as always on a Sunday, but this time it was fairly different. I came to experience the power random women are capable to execute over me through the help of male slaves.
    Well, hear me out on this. Sunday’s chest day so I grabbed the 82 lbs dumbbells for benching. Pumping until exhausted I tried to gently let the dbs slide to the ground. However, they’re just too heavy to do it without a little noise.
    Enter the random bitch. She complained to me that I’m being too loud and that I should stop it. To that I answered of course that I always try to put the dbs down as gentle as possible. She warned me not to do it again. I didn’t respond to that childish bitching.
    After a pause I did another set and (surprise) even though I tried it didn’t help much.
    The bitch then decided to “let’s you and him fight” and went to the owner to complain and the owner kicked me out for good regardless that I’ve been a valued customer for about 10 yrs.
    How would you have responded?

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Should have gone with the 80 lb dumbs, rather than the custom 82s.

      Those extra two pounds can, as you will have discerned, make a BIG difference.

      Cool story, bro.

    • Captain Obvious says:

      AGREE AND AMPLIFY: “Yeah, you’re right. I’m a 98-pound weakling. Wanna help me lift these weights?” MILD NEG [for very petite chicks]: “Here you hold it for me” [and then hand it to her]. STRONGER NEG [for bigger gals]: “Hey, you’re a big strapping corn-fed cow-girl, how about if you lift ‘em for me?” ALL-PURPOSE NEG: “Whoa, check it out, Oprah Winfrey wore those very same leotards in her exercise video.” ASSUME THE SALE: “Yeah, these barbells are pretty large, aren’t they? But just wait until you try getting your mouth around my balls. Then you’ll learn what big really is.”

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Your fundamental problem, however, is that the owner is a douchebag. You could try to have a man-to-man conversation with him, and tell him that he’s gonna lose all of his righteous clientele, and only have Betas left in the mix, but he’s probably happy with that scenario. Welcome to life as a Lone Wolf. Set up your own gym at home, and leave the meat-market gyms with their bizarre Cluster-B femc*nt nutjobs for the Beta orbiter losers. PS: On the way out, you should have told the chick: “Congratulations, you got me kicked out of the gym. Now you owe me dinner. Give me your number.”

      • Captain Obvious says:

        There’s a YKW toy franchise in the USA, called the “Barbie doll” – I don’t know what the equivalent in Europe would be – but you could tease her about that: “Princess Barbie, I’m so sorry that I offended you.” Maybe throw in a “Would your highness like her humble servant to lick her anus this evening?”

      • Suburban_elk says:

        funny stuff but lay off the anus referencing

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “…stick my tongue up your anus…” was an old Arnold Schwarzenegger line that he used on bimbos in the SoCal weightlifting scene and on the movie sets in Hollyweird. I guess that nowadays, what with women having every manner of foreign object inserted up their backsides, maybe the line doesn’t have quite the cachet which it once had.

      • corvinus says:

        “…stick my tongue up your anus…” was an old Arnold Schwarzenegger line

        “Detox my buttox” sounds a lot better somehow.

    • Lazy Hero says:

      Had that happen before. Wench complained they may hit her. Told her I didn’t care and I think to f off. Didn’t get kicked out of the gym though. Best strategy w women is to ignore if you can’t do that tell them you don’t care and mean it. Short of getting someone else on her side theres nothing more she can do. And yes I’ve had them get that someone else but f them too.

      • anon dudebro says:

        Yeah, that’s my standard non-reaction as well, but that didn’t work out so well here…

    • Suburban_elk says:

      Stories such as this are everything. Totally believable.

      This guy is working to be a man, and some female is like, stop making noise.

      The relevant advice is find slash create a better environment, in which to work out.

    • Foolish Pride says:

      Put a horse’s head in the owner’s bed. That’ll send the prick a message.

  18. anon dudebro says:

    Shut up, Greg. These “custom” dbs weigh 37.5 kg which is 82.67 lbs.
    In other parts of the world people use the SI unit system.

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Gyms being the touch-and-go businesses they are, I’m surprised any owner would 86 a steady customer, merely for what you describe.

      My bad for never having seen metric dumbbells… you can understand how mention of 82 pounders made the bullshit meter flicker.

      • anon dudebro says:

        Yeah, I was totally caught off guard by that move.
        The girl obviously did a good job manipulating him. She even had another dude instrumentalized as her “witness”.
        As I was saying, I’ve been lifting for quite a while but yeah, people usually can’t believe it until they see me lift them.

      • Anonymous says:

        If the owner is listening to bitches cry about dumbbells hitting the floor then it’s a fairy gym anyway and the poster is better off elsewhere.

        Imagine if he overloaded the bench press one day and couldn’t get it off himself. Who in that gym is going to be able to help him? They might crack their nail polish or something.

      • anon dudebro says:

        I’ve seen it happen when dudes overload their barbells. Ain’t funny. Firend of mine hit his face because he didn’t have a competent spotter
        That’s why I train solely with dumbbells at least for now.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Why the f*ck are you dudes not using selectorized weight stacks? Here in the USA, you can buy used selectorized equipment for pennies on the dollar. Within a four hour drive of your house [maybe even within two hours in a big megatropolis], there’s a gym going bankrupt every frigging week. Free weights are INSANELY DANGEROUS! Hit Craigslist and eBay and build your own selectorized gym. You do own pickup trucks, don’t you? Or at least SUVs with towing packages?

      • corvinus says:

        Gyms being the touch-and-go businesses they are, I’m surprised any owner would 86 a steady customer, merely for what you describe.

        Well, there was that gym recently that 86’d a woman who complained about a biologically-male “transgender” in the women’s locker room.

  19. Mario says:

    Hey, guys. can u help with this situation, if nothing else its som insight into wrong use of no-contact….

    I picked up 26-yo girl (7-8/10), in 2yr ongoing long distance relationship ..she denied having BF after being asked on the 1st date. I still cant unsee how precise, automatic, cold-blooded answer it was. 4 months later, I have found out, went no contact (only some professional brief calls initiated by both of us *mistake on my part* …
    and here we go… she “fell out of love” and went to back to first guy….
    Damn – wrong use of NC went BETA :/….Any way to bounce back and get back mojo? My side girls are weak : one is 5/10 (with 3 suicidal orbiters), another is 9/10 , 19yo with predisposition to becoming chubby (not gonna keep that), plus add few booty calls which im not interested in.. ..
    I dont find fucking w orbiters being a challenge, unlike losing girl and upper hand in relationship.

    Advice?

    • JironGhrad says:

      If you’re not trolling, the best answer is to put more effort into a 9… if she has a predisposition to getting fat… kick her ass into keeping it off. Why do you care about an older 7-8 who’s clearly a liar with issues?

      • mario says:

        Thanks Giron, I’m not trolling. I got a long, disgusting rationalising/ apology message from 26yo, blaming everyone but not her, and invite for a coffee. She solved it for me, she’s nexted. Why I fell for older? Look for a bit of betaness here…thought of a safe spot I guess. shes uber-feminine and we both have good social status…19 yo 9/10 , while challenging, is hardly maintainable as a main, she’s likely gon see a “lostas cockazz” tbh.

      • JironGhrad says:

        If you take the attitude that you can’t keep it (ie. a 9 or 10) then you’re going to have a hard time. If you go balls out though, it’s not as hard to keep them and she won’t take “lotsas cockazz”, it will be just yours. True 9s and 10s don’t get approached a lot because they’re intimidating to most guys and they know they have high value. Unless you’re her back-up plan, you’re doing pretty well.

      • Tilikum says:

        Jiron the Redeemer of Whores

      • JironGhrad says:

        I have no idea where you get that notion, Tilikum. I’ve only twice slept with girls who had a notch count over 1. Say what you will about lying whores who discount their notches, but I know for a fact that when you break them in the first time (or at worst 2nd) they get all bonded and clingy in ways that the more worthless ones can’t fake.

      • Foolish Pride says:

        HeyTillikCUM, sounds like NRO is closer to your neck of the woods.

  20. Culum Struan says:

    YaReally, Sentient, Wala, HABD, Kant, Scray etc

    Another social vignette from life.

    Was at some party and I met a really interesting guy who was just very good at building rapport/connection and asking “deep” questions (like the “36 questions” from the NYT etc). Not just with me but with everyone.

    Nothing sexual about it (I suspect he’s gay actually..not camp, but just some minor mannerisms made me think).

    More just a question of how good he was at having an actual (two-way) conversation and getting off polite chat into deeper stuff by asking deeper questions that actually make you pause and think about the answer. And then *listening* properly to what you answered and making some intelligent comment about it.

    And he wasn’t a closed book himself, firing question after question at you – he would talk about your stuff and relate it to his experiences, and also tell some good stories of his own – but never so much that you felt he’d taken over the conversation or that he’d gone into “performing monkey” mode – it was still very much a *conversation*. In fact, several others begged him to tell some of his best stories before he actually did.

    And he did all this in a fairly low-key way – in the sense that he doesn’t obviously dominate the conversation or speak the loudest or anything. He has a sort of calm energy and vibe that’s very relaxing. But you end up leaving the conversation feeling good and it’s only when you think about it that you realise you opened up to him more than he did to you.

    It kinda felt like being on the receiving end of some of the rapport building stuff YaReally talks about.

    From what I could make out, he moved to my city two years ago and basically created a new social circle out of thin air – people he met but who didn’t know each other before are now firm friends and now he’s moving on to another new city for work.

    I spoke to him for maybe 20 mins and saw him on and off throughout the party and I remember thinking several times “I really like this guy”. There’s just something about him.

    Very impressive – if I hadn’t spent so much time on CH and elsewhere and read YaReally’s stuff and Juggler and so on, I wouldn’t have consciously registered what he was doing – I would have just walked away thinking “I really like this guy”.

    But it was really interesting to see this kind of rapport building stuff in action in the real world and how it works when someone good does it, and he obviously enjoys it.

    In terms of personal learning points, I need to work on (a) being much less “performing monkey” – I’m pretty good at now being socially entertaining and telling stories and making jokes but it feels more like I’m performing tryhard than connecting; and (b) practicing rapport building and asking deeper questions (without coming off as interviewing) and listening well..and making EC more.

    PS – I still don’t know what he does for work and the only reason I know his last name is because he was on the email list of all people invited to the party

    • FredMertz says:

      Ok I just skimmed your post,but would I be correct in assuming you’re coming out as a homo?

      • kuchak says:

        Up until the last 2 paragraphs I thought it was a girl talking about some guy that made her wet.

    • Junior says:

      @Culum Struan

      It’s pretty inspiring hey. That’s been my focus for the last few months heading out solo. Met a really social guy at a local place recently, & while putting Ya’s advice into action, I was also actually interested in what he was saying… he ends up telling me, “man you’ve got a gift haha, I’ve just given you my life story!” – was pretty rewarding being able to get some random stranger’s trust & interest enough for him to open up. For me, I find when I make an effort to BE interested in someone, it’s like a positive feedback loop where my brain then realizes, “Oh, my attention is on this person, so they must be interesting” & away we go. It makes those nights where you bomb out with women a lot more worthwhile, cause at the very least you’ve actually interacted with humanity, connected on some level & added value to someone’s night, instead of just going home all bummed & focused on the attention from women that you didn’t get. I also find it has positive mental flow-on effects for a day or two afterwards, where, like Owen says, my brain has ‘proof not promises’ that the world is a safer, more friendly place, & I find I’m more proactive, positive and social for the next couple of days.

      • Mork says:

        Well, isn’t that the paradox of a lot of the advice here? A lot of this stuff works a lot better if you actually like people and are genuinely interested in them, and a lot of people who come here for advice really don’t and aren’t. Which is the source of their problems in the first place.

      • DirtyOldMan says:

        Exactly right, Mork. I live nowhere so socializing involves a trip. I just dig in and talk to people. Anyone and everyone. Soak it up. Being engaged with people makes it a lot easier to open a girl that wanders up.

        Otherwise it looks like you are just sitting waiting for your moment on stage and her response is going to be…OK, you waited for me, wow me…

      • Culum Struan says:

        @Junior/Mork/DirtyOldMan – yeah, exactly – not at this party but I’ve had that kind of thing happen to me a couple of times and it’s a real rush. AND it makes you more attractive to women too – it’s not like an entirely separate category.

        @FredMertz – yeah dude, I decided to give up on all this “getting better with women” thing and figured sucking cock is the easiest way to go..any tips for me?

    • Sentient says:

      @culum

      The calm energy and vibe – that’s authenticity. That’s the vibe that locks people in and girls especially. It comes across in two ways in social settings first is you can see he is not trying hard the second is he is not “after” anything from the interaction. The first part is easy in pickup if you have lived a full life.

      The second part is the hard part in pick up because you are definitely after something and this fucks up the subcomms. Part of getting around this is actually having real feelings of attaction to the target and the other part is sexualizing the interaction early so that the thing you are “after” becomes authentic to the target.

      When you have a “dishonest” interaction you typically fail… The whole “surprise I have a penis” thing.

      Women are very very careful about dishonesty. What fucks guys up about this is they are always putting moral judgments on dishonesty so they miss windows. And women hate being judged.

      It’s a deep topic.

    • walawala says:

      @Culum after you push through and start banging more girls regularly, you’ll get more confident and get out of “performing monkey” mode….I’m moving past that now and the results are more satisfying.

      The other thing you may have noticed about the guy is that he wasn’t “gaming” he was just unaware of his own game.

      By becoming self-aware you start to gauge and pay close attention to the details–that’s why there’s a need for assessment of texts or reaction to shit-tests. It’s like learning a new language.

      Eventually you’ll start to internalize all the techniques and they will become more “Natural” but by being more game-savvy you’ll notice the IOI’s.

      As an update to my previous story about the 27 year old…She did reply to me:

      “I want to see you babe…I won’t be late…what do you think about that?”

      Me:: “What else?”

      Her: smiley icon

      Me: That’s it? As an aging sex-addict with limited time left I need to know that time is well spent….

      THIS AGAIN WAS MY SELF-AMUSED REFERENCE TO HER BIZARRE TEXT TWO WEEKS AGO

      She then apologized….twice…long…telling me how she didn’t mean it, how she wouldn’t be so nuts, blah blah blah.

      My calibration and response is new. Also, I’m not so emotionally involved in the outcome so I can leave this for a few days and then respond with some kind of “Let’s meet Monday. Come over.” kind of message.

      Again, it’s conveying “value”…. I saw a dude trying to get a hot girl out of a bar the other night. He was leaning in, making all sorts of jokes and she was kind of staring at him…with amused mastery. It was a very insightful learning moment for me on what NOT to do…and how chicks often have better game than guys because they’re “Naturals”.

      • Culum Struan says:

        @wala – another message in mod (it wasn’t that long – WTF?) but LOL at the image of the girl leaning back in amused mastery with the guy – I know exactly what you mean – one of my earliest posts on CH comments last year was about going to a strip club and observing how a stripper tried every Game tactic on me.

        I know what you mean about being less performing monkey but it’s harder (not impossible..just will take longer) for me because my travel schedule means I tend to have a few weeks of going out/dating/banging girls followed by weeks of travelling with nothing and having to come back and re-start the rotation from scratch..so it’s only for very briefperiods that I actually have a full rotation running.

  21. Culum Struan says:

    WTF how did that long post go through without getting into mod? Not that I mind – it’s great – but just so random. I’m not even logged in

  22. Anon2 says:

    I have a question :

    How much does the relatively well-off black woman spend on keeping her hair straight and, on occasion, colored something other than black?

    I mean, not only did white men invent this and other de-negrofication technologies that black women won’t be seen dead without (some gratitude by black women would be nice), but it seems black women do this treatment often, as even the 3 mm closest to their scalps are not nappy.

    How much does it cost at a salon? It appears that well-off black women are spending hundreds of dollars a month just to de-negrofy their hair, since it is obviously done as often as once a week.

    • FredMertz says:

      The first black millionaire was some black woman that built a hair straightening brand. ironic aint it??

      • Anon2 says:

        But how much does it cost per woman?

        It must be quite high, since they don’t even let the first 3 mm of new nappy hair stay nappy for long.

      • James Blonde says:

        Why don’t you ask Former president of the confederacy Jefferson Davis?

      • James Blonde says:

        Do as I say *cough* not as I do.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Try again, try-hard. She’s not a negro, nor any mixture thereof.

        I bet if you looked hard enough at some of your baby pictures, you’d appear almost Puerto Rican.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      • James Blonde says:

        What ever you say dad.

      • King A says:

        Even Greg would work as a substitute father figure for T-WAKKK. Better a rancorous paternal relationship than no relationship at all.

  23. Putin says:

    http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/feminist-sexologist-review-of-dan-bergners-what-do-women-want-0627134

    “Evolutionary psychologists excel in telling fairy tales”
    “women need excitement and variety or that drive goes underground”
    “that many women with “low desire” are really just bored.”
    ” Women are less suited for monogamy than men”

    • JironGhrad says:

      Amazing that anyone would publish his book. Since that pretty much proves hypergamy as presented by CH, and proves that the system is misandrist.

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Someone should ask that cockbite commando how “start killing Russians” worked out for past generals… and what the f!ck are they teaching at West Point these days?

  24. Dalrock says:

    Thank you for the link. I suspect the data Ras al Ghul was referring to is from my post Forfeiting The Patriarchal Dividend. The two key charts are animated, showing the progression as you look in the older age brackets:

    And:

  25. Jarvis Cuckold says:

    Is it a hate crime to suggest that the Mojave Desert has more moisture in it than Madonna?

  26. Captain Obvious says:

    Oklahoma man woke to girlfriend biting his penis off: police http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/3268319/posts

  27. Experienced Father says:

    CH,

    More _SCIENCE_ for your “Love is bio-mechanics” quiver.

    See:

    Brain experts say they can tell what stage of romance someone is at by looking at MRI results

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2995741/The-scan-says-s-true-love.html#ixzz3UYmURK21

    And the original article and extract the Daily Mail science writer used:

    Love-related changes in the brain: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study
    Front. Hum. Neurosci., 13 February 2015 | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00071

    http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00071/full

    Abstract —

    “Romantic love is a motivational state associated with a desire to enter or maintain a close relationship with a specific other person. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have found activation increases in brain regions involved in the processing of reward, motivation and emotion regulation, when romantic lovers view photographs of their partners.

    However, not much is known about whether romantic love affects the brain’s functional architecture during rest. In the present study, resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data was collected to compare the regional homogeneity (ReHo) and functional connectivity (FC) across an “in-love” group (LG, N = 34, currently intensely in love), an “ended-love” group (ELG, N = 34, ended romantic relationship recently), and a “single” group (SG, N = 32, never fallen in love).

    Results show that:

    (1) ReHo of the left dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) was significantly increased in the LG (in comparison to the ELG and the SG);

    (2) ReHo of the left dACC was positively correlated with length of time in love in the LG, and negatively correlated with the lovelorn duration since breakup in the ELG;

    (3) FC within the reward, motivation, and emotion regulation network (dACC, insula, caudate, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens) as well as FC in the social cognition network [temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), inferior parietal, precuneus, and temporal lobe] was significantly increased in the LG (in comparison to the ELG and SG);

    (4) in most regions within both networks FC was positively correlated with the duration of love in the LG but negatively correlated with the lovelorn duration of time since breakup in the ELG.

    This study provides first empirical evidence of love-related alterations in brain functional architecture.

    Furthermore, the results shed light on the underlying neural mechanisms of romantic love, and demonstrate the possibility of applying a resting-state fMRI approach for investigating romantic love.”

    Love is bio-mechanical, predictable, and subject to our conscious influence.

    And CH is the prophet of that hard truth.

  28. map says:

    It’s not open marriage. It’s no-fault open marriage. That is the key.

Leave a Reply