Commenter PA aptly compares the mind control psy ops of the American Hivemind to invidious methods employed by 20th century Communists.
The purpose of agitprop (agitation and propaganda) was to motivate the Bolsheviks and demoralize the rest. A constant stream of such images and headlines flashing before us is designed to do just that. And demoralize it does, those who are still ‘blue pill.’ Demoralization takes various forms, from despair, to confusion, to Stockholm syndrome, to a sense of unpersonhood.
The last one is what those under the effects of PCP describe as a sense of lacking a physical body — and what Lawrence Auster (the late, great analyst of the metaphysics of leftism) described as Whites being framed as bodiless beings who lack a concrete physical identity and culture, and are only capable of good or evil as measured by their attitude toward non-whites.
Naturally, comments under that [anti-white] article are turned off. The article can be picked apart in moments by anyone here, or just search the net for “black privilege”.
America is a communist country; does anyone here have any lingering doubts? Look at a defense industry web page. Conservative stuff, eh?
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/who-we-are/culture.html
A hostile elite can’t demographically displace the majority until it has first displaced the majority’s sense of identity. Sixty years on, the latter goal has been realized in the USSA. Now achievement of the original mission — race replacement of whites by non-whites without violent backlash — is just a formality.
I believe this is PA’s second COTW award. I wonder who holds the record? GBFM?
***
Speaking of the devilzzllzol, GBFM takes home this edition of the COTW runner-up award:
lzozoozzo
the peer review system
put both
Socrates and Jesus
to deathlzozoozoozozozozz
Sometimes direct observation is better than waiting for peer review to guide your decisions.
***
COTW consolation prize goes to everybodyhatesscott, for his reminder that God Himself was not averse to knocking up teen girls.
The virgin Mary was mid to early teens. If it’s good enough for God.
God didn’t search out a women’s studies grad student for supreme alpha fertilization, either.

[…] Comment Of The Week: USSA […]
The peer review put Socrates and Jesus to death. That’s cold blooded right there son
da peepr reviews systemsz also rejected da gbfmz genius work until da gbfm found da proper journalsz:
Journalsz of Postmodern Poststurtctcurluzuzm and Womenez HEmeneurticz Frankfartzers zhoolz
Editors: Dalrock, Vox, and Boxer da Marcusisan Atheist Churchian
lzlzoozozoz ozmg zlzo
Mob mentality would choose a convicted murderer over a savior.
under judeo christian law
filming pron pornz cockas penertetinag bnghzozlzizzlzozo anal sexth
is illegal
while whistling at provocatively dressed womenz
is legal
under frankfartiztz frankfartaiana lawsz
filming pron pornsz cockas penertetinag bnghzozlzizzlzozo anal sexth
is legal
while whistling at provocatively dressed womenz
is lllegal
note that while women are allowed to film porn for their job
and actually act and partake in it
but if a man watches it at his job
just watches it without taking cockas in his muth and bung
he is quickly fired
while she is paid
lzozozozoz ozmzgzzlzlzoozozo
lzozozozozozo
SO AS TO MAINTIANZ MY UPSCALE
REPUTATINZ OF SCHOALRY ERUDITIONLZOZO
DA GBFM HAD TO ADOPT THE SCREEN NAME
OF
JOHNNY CASTLE!!!!!
J O H N N Y C A S T L E !!!!!!
SAme inniatalsl as J.C. lzozozo as I beleivez and worship da 0Dalrockina Voxian gamey jeuss jeuss in all my pron fiflnznzz,zzooz filmzz so dat i will someday hope to get instalanches too just like dlaorokasksz zlzozolzlz.
You won’t be in trouble for watching porn, however, if you work for the government. E Penibus Jizzum.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/07/epa-employees-not-fired-for-watching-pornography-stealing-money/
This is true. It occurred to me that paraphobia is probably a fear that many men have these days. If you look up paraphobia, you will see that it is a fear transvestites and gays have that other people view them as being perverted. This is utter nonsense. The people viewed as perverts are older men, porn viewers, people who cat call, men who stare at women, men who go to strip clubs, etc, etc. The media has done its fair share of “catching” men in these acts and then shaming them. Not to mention all the laws that dictate how men are allowed to sexually interact with women.
If you look up paraphobia, you will see that it is a fear transvestites and gays have that other people view them as being perverted.
Other people do… just not in the make-believe world of the mainstream media.
If you ain’t a pervert, you ain’t shit.
Well done. When you’re aware of it, you see it everywhere.
zlklozozozozol
lzoozozoozoz
> “When you’re aware of it, you see it everywhere.”
EVERY. GOD-DAMNED. WHERE.
And no, you’re not paranoid.
EVERY. GOD-DAMNED. WHERE.
“A constant stream of such images and headlines flashing before us is designed to do just that.”
——————————————————————————————–
So are you saying white people are being turned into ni66ers the way black people were?
Funny how that works.
Blacks act like Blacks no matter what. Anyone can see the slaughters and mass rapes in Africa. Blacks act the same whether in Africa, Europe, North America or South America. Always straining to find ways to break the law and let their nature run free. Don’t try to find excuses for your behavior, boy.
“A Gambian national who goes by the name Sonko Tijan is languishing behind bars after being arrested in Austria for secretly and separately keeping four wives, seven fiancées and five girlfriends.”
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3222042/posts
4 + 7 + 5 = 16. You need to sleep for at least 8 hours at night. Which means that during your waking day, you’re spinning one plate per hour? And feminazis think that multiculturalism is compatile with “PAY ATTENTION TO ME ME ME ME!?!?!”
If white people can’t be turned into neegars because they are NOT black; why are you worried about “A constant stream of such images and headlines flashing before us is designed to do just that?”
Doesn’t that 1 to 4 percent Neanderthal DNA make you immune?
I talk about this stuff with my friends sometimes and they often ask me “Why do you care what happens in America?” and I always tell them “Because the jews are going to push for this shit everywhere not just in America”. They aren’t really convinced but anyone who is ‘redpilled’ can see the signs pretty clearly.
They’re going after Russia as well. Fortunately, Putin has told them to go fuck themselves.
For years people have asked me and have had a hard time understanding why I -a Canadian- am more interested in what goes on the in USA than what goes on here.
Everything that happens in the USA eventually happens elsewhere or at least the ripples are felt. Most people do not seem to be aware of that.
As for Canada, I see it as the little dingy row boat tied behind the large ship that is the USA, where they go we go, if they sink we sink. ( not to mention the USA buys at least 75% of everything we produce, without the USA our economy would shrink to nothing )
Canada’s prime minister P.E Trudeau in the the late 1960s started to turn Canada into a multicultural babel tower right after the USA started this trend circa 1965.
It is a certainty that the flood of millions of illegals in the USA will spill at least a little into Canada, and then we too will be stuck with semi illiterate semi retarded criminals that we will have to support with our hard earned tax dollars.
At this rate the Chinese will control the world sooner than expected
Regarding PA’s observation, I read an article by Gary North today about agitprop. He writes that those who study the history of ideas never mention in what context those ideas emerged: “what, when, where, who and why”. Because this requires knowledge of another field of history, he says.
Actually he is incorrect. There are those who have studied the history of the Marxist ideas he mentions. But those people are silenced.
Gary North writes about the communist Gramsci, whose plan is something people should know about. But as always he forgets the immensely more important media role in all this. The media could have exposed the Marxist plan, and then it would have failed. The reason they didn’t is that they were in on the plan, and that is the only way it could have succeeded.
The article about Gramsci, the Koch Brothers, Keynes, Hayek:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/11/gary-north/the-puzzler/
The one Communist understood this thoroughly was Antonio Gramsci. He was an Italian, and he spent most of the last years of his life in prison. Mussolini had him locked up, and he never got out. But he had to abandon Marxism in order to provide a new strategy of revolution. Marx had taught that the mode of production is central: the substructure of society. He regarded ideas as simply window dressing for class interests: the superstructure. But the labor unions of the West made it obvious to Gramsci that there was not going to be a Communist revolution. Union members just wanted a larger piece of the capitalist pie. Therefore, he said, the only way to undermine capitalism in the West is to undermine the moral foundations of capitalism.
Alas, Gary North makes a common mistake: thinking that the Marxist attack on business owners was the point with Marxism, so that when Gramsci advocated another strategy, he “abandoned Marxism”. The point is to control the West, period. The manner in which this is done is of less concern. It is noteworthy that all the feminist initiators were Marxists, either openly or clearly in their writings: Susan Sonntag, Andrea Dworkin, Betty Friedan, Naomi Wolf, Margaret Mead.
Something also usually ignored is the fact that today’s environmentalism was birthed by left-wing extremism. They praised industrial production and the coming “land of plenty” when they thought the Soviet Union would win. When the Soviet Union performed lousily in economics, they suddenly switched to being against industry – because of pollution, they said. (And “materialism”, suddenly. After having been hardcore-focused on materialism.) And it was the West that had invented industry, invented technology. So the West is evil. The non-Westerners had CHOSEN not to invent technology because they weren’t greedy and “lived in harmony with nature”. That’s the origin of their talk about acid rain, exploding nuclear plants, an end to metals, an end to oil, global cooling, and today global warming.
Arbiter, I wouldn’t keep calliing them “Marxists” – I’d call them “Nihilists” – their only motivation seems to be the uncontrollable desire to destroy and annihilate every civil polity which they encounter. The very fact that they can flip on a dime and go from being ostensibly pro-industry [Stalin, American heavy-industry unionism, etc] to being ostensibly anti-industry [ecopaganism, muticulturalism, etc] proves that they have no allegiance to any underlying philosophical principle whatsoever.
Unless you want to argue that “Marxism” is just Nihilism wrapped up in a bunch of pretentious pseudo-philosophical horseshit designed to sway the minds of the shkotzim Useful Idiots who are susceptible to falling for it. But we musn’t allow the jews to control the vocabulary of the discussion, and it is imperative that we speak honestly and describe a thing for what it is.
I’d still call them Marxists, because it is still his plan, just taking other forms. In his time the form it took was to attack business owners, monarchy, family, churches, the German police and military. Later the attack also included nuclear power (but only in the West), nuclear weapons (but only in the West). And today the focus is on race, normalcy vs. perversion, eco-fanaticism. But that is just the form it takes now. The principle is the same, and it was described so overwhelmingly under the name of Marxism that I think the name should be kept. It is a word that people understand. It has a history. The only other word I would add to describe what they are doing is egalitarianism, or equalism as some in the manosphere modernize it. Egalitarianism also has a history.
The Left likes to come up with an endless flood of -isms, both for their own side and their targets. They label everything in small categories, which is their substitute for facts. Consider “Marxism, Leninism, Marxism-Leninism, Stalinism, Anarchism, Maoism, Gramscyism, Trotskyism”, etc etc. They obfuscate their own side this way: “You can’t pick on me for what Stalin or Pol Pot or Mao did, because I’m a Leninist.” And they use it to target their enemies – giving something a label makes it “real” in people’s eyes, and makes it framed in the way the label suggests. HOWEVER, this only works because they have the media on their side. Everything they say is repeated and amplified thousands of times.
We should not do like them. Not just because it looks stupid to come up with constantly new label, but also because there are no global media to constantly carry our new explanation to every corner. So we should stick with a terminology that stays the same over time and that people understand.
It is also more mature, and that wins in the end with the kind of people who we want to talk to.
Arbiter, you’ve just allowed the jews to frame the terms of the entire debate, which means that you’ve lost the war before the first first shot has even been fired. If you want to actually win this thing [and honestly, it doesn’t sound to me as though you do want to win], then you must SPEAK FORTHRIGHTLY.
One addendum: globalism is a word I have seen more and more, and that is the one new word I say we should try to perpetuate. It sounds logical and timely. People understand what you mean. And it ties together the top groups in both the Left and the Right, which is the point: to show that the Marxists on the Left have allies in the fake Right.
Because it works well it has managed to spread, which few new labels created on the Right have done. I say we should help spread it now and then.
Warning of a New World Order worked, because politicians actually used that word (Bush Sr., Kissinger, Clinton and others), but it is outdated. It suggests a centralized government, which was believable at one point but which will not come to pass. Globalism is a fluent establishment. Globalism is real. It would be excellent if it was used so much that the Left eventually started to defend it; it sounds just like the sort of word that they would like to defend.
“and honestly, it doesn’t sound to me as though you do want to win”
Seriously, don’t be silly. Out of the two of us, I bet I’m the only one who has spent years doing nationalist activism. We talk about Marxism, we don’t talk about nihilism. Those who have attacked my friends call themselves socialists, communists and Marxists, not nihilists. Don’t come and tell me “it doesn’t sound as though you want to win” just because I use the word Marxism, which nationalists have done for decades, instead of nihilism, which is used far, far less.
But Arbiter, you’ve allowed the liars to define themselves and to FRAME the very debate itself. Simply by submitting to their lies and submitting to their deceitfulness in choosing their FRAME, you have already lost the debate.
It’s the same thing with our ancient and noble Western tradition of property rights and freedom of contract: If you allow the jew to require you to speak of that heritage solely via the jewish slur “Kapitalismus”, then you lose and the jew wins.
And here at the Chateau, it would be akin to requiring “thwack” or “Scray” to refer to themselves as “chicken-bone-sucking watermelon-seed-spitting step-n-fetchit porch monkeys” before they would be allowed to participate in a conversation.
How on earth did I guess?
“Tijan has also been accused of benefits fraud, using his women, children and fake names and photos of friends who were also black to claim thousands from the Austrian social services.
He once posted online that the Austrians could not tell the difference between black men anyway.” particularly Austrian women, it would appear.
You don’t need to look any further than your television to see this brainwashing in its full fruition.
There are currently two ads on national TV, for two different products, that prominently feature a black guy slapping the shit out of a white man. Yes, these are prime time ads, one for a video game and one for a car.
Try to imagine any other permutation of someone getting slapped in an ad. Would you ever see a black man or woman getting slapped by anyone? Of course not. Would you ever see any woman getting slapped by anyone? No. And, would you ever see any black being slapped by any white of either sex? Can you imagine the firestorm of indignation and angst that would ensue?
There are currently two ads on national TV, for two different products, that portray white family reunions, that prominently feature a black guy as a participant.
One is for an internet provider, the family reunion is in full swing and , out of nowhere, a black guy inexplicably is inserted into the center of the frame.
The other is worse. Ad for bourbon, I believe. White family reunion, lots of still shots of whites sitting around a table and so forth, and then, boom, a lingering still shot of a black guy looms into view and lingers for a few seconds. It makes no literal sense in the context of the ad, and quite frankly it creeped me the fuck out.
Check out essentially every other ad on TV. You cannot find one that doesn’t include a black, which I guess would be okay except the blacks are always the doctor, the attorney, the architect, the investment advisor, the caring dad who dotes on his 3 immaculately groomed children and mows his immaculately groomed lawn around his $750,000 suburban home, etc.
The message is simple. There is no area of your life that will remain untouched by blacks. You need brain surgery? Meet your surgeon, Jamal. Would you like to retire someday? D’Ontavious will be managing your 401K. Oh, and meet your new neighbors, Derrick and Shaniqua. Whassamatta? You racist or something?
Oh don’t worry…white males are amply represented in these ads. Just look for the pear-shaped zeta male….. soft, indecisive, pussy whipped and terrified of his shrieking cunt wife. Sometimes they’ll put him in a pastel shirt or have him hold his wife’s handbag just so there is no confusion as to what a bumbling pussy he is.
TV ads are a window into the zeitgeist like no other. No image is an accident. These things cost a fortune to produce and put on the air, and they are meticulously field tested and focus grouped.
TV ads are specifically crafted to trigger subconscious longings, and to insert images, desires and ideas directly into your sub/unconscious mind, bypassing your rational mind and your faculties for critical thinking. There are armies of psychologists and behavioral specialists who bring their diabolical expertise to bear to accomplish this.
TPOSIWID.
“The purpose of something is what it does”.
Does an image of a black guy assaulting a white man sell cars? No.
Does an image of a black guy’s face looming over a white family reunion sell bourbon? No.
Does the portrayal of a white man as a terrified faggot sell car insurance? No.
Then why are these themes so dominant?
There is a deeper agenda, and it is evil as hell. Who sets this agenda? I don’t know but it is undeniably there, and it is anything but an accident.
The purpose of something is what it does.
And yes I’ve been watching a lot of TV lately. I shattered my ankle when I stepped in a gopher hole while hunting antelope so I’m on the couch.
I could turn off my TV, but this process, this mindset, this agenda, this all out psychological war on American minds continues anyway.
There are currently two ads on national TV, for two different products, that portray white family reunions, that prominently feature a black guy as a participant.
———————————————————————————-
Whats wrong with that?
Ive attended a few white family reunions Im not related to?
Indeed, I was not the only unrelated person in attendance.
Jeez… you guys see wood piles everywhere
As usual, thwack misses the point… blinded by his shit-colored glasses and “well, in MY experience” immaterial observations.
thwacky, shut up, boy. You’re only kept around as a comic relief and because CH wants to show people the retarded vomiting of “bruthas”.
Whats wrong with that?
Ive attended a few white family reunions Im not related to?
Bussing the tables doesn’t count, Sambo.
serving dinner doesnt count
Sucking white dick doesn’t count either, I suppose?
My foreign wife likes to watch TV to improve her Engrish. It is bizarre to see a dozen of these black/white marketing juxtapositions running back-to-back in a single commercial break. Finally I had had enough and dumped cable. Got a Roku which helps stifle most of the idiocy. Also a rabbit-ear. PBS has some good programming but definitely pushes leftist gobledeegook in what should be neutral topics. Always a laff to click past the Mexican channels and their overtly sexist programming to get to primetime portrayals of 30-something tough chick detectives in hip-huggers flipping their hair and waving hand-cannons while “covering” their black sidekicks and proving that women can perform in combat.
Come on Greg, you may even be old enough to remember some of these ads:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/babymantis/racism-in-30-vintage-ads-1opu
Dude, you’re making my point for me… amusing depictions of negroes being negroes are not what today’s ads are all about.
When you keep repeating what’s already been gainsaid, it makes you look like you’re admitting to being a petulant troll… or dimmer than a 2w night light.
Elmer !!!!! Good to hear you speak. I have been looking for a recent post of yours as Spearhead is down and haven’t seen you at ROK. I implore you to write articles on employment game and foreign brides. I m going abroad to teach english, the last easy job I could get. Can’t get hired on at the state of CA and employers keep “purging” me cause I don’t vocalize some diversity crap, one is totally vetted theses days on the job. Also, american woman are TRASH !!!! You seem to have figured it out. Nes pa?
TV ads are a window into the zeitgeist like no other. No image is an accident. These things cost a fortune to produce and put on the air, and they are meticulously field tested and focus grouped.
Everything you say in your post rings resoundingly… but you yourself admit that a n1663r slapping a white guy doesn’t sell cars, nor an animated lawn jockey at a white family reunion sell bourbon… so where are these alleged “field tests” and from whence do these “focus groups” arise?
Nowhere… there are certain ads and images that are, ipso facto, “approved” without asking the alleged target groups… or the target groups are carefully hand-picked ahead of time to bamboozle the product producers by the ad merchants.
Let’s say it clearly: the ads are propaganda, simple as that. The ad agencies are swarming with Tribe leftists.
I come to think of Freud’s nephew Edward Bernays, who worked at an ad agency. He was hired to make women start smoking cigarettes, because conservative tradition kept women from smoking. He went to a feminist demonstration in New York (of course in New York, Hive headquarters) and had a group of women walk down the street smoking cigarettes. He hurried down the street and told his fellow leftists in the press that “soon a group will come to strike a blow for women’s freedom” and they eagerly helped him out by photographing the smoking women when they got there, presenting it as a glorious blow for female equality, and pushing destruction of femininity at the same time.
Greg Eliot
so where are these alleged “field tests” and from whence do these “focus groups” arise?
——————————————————————————————-
I don’t know, but black people have ALWAYS been popular ad material for selling things to white people. Aunt Jamima and Cream of Wheat are just a couple off the top of my head; but I think there are entire web sites devoted to “racist” images of black people used to market goods and services.
If it worked back then, why not now?
I don’t know, but black people have ALWAYS been popular ad material for selling things to white people. Aunt Jamima and Cream of Wheat are just a couple off the top of my head; but I think there are entire web sites devoted to “racist” images of black people used to market goods and services.
If it worked back then, why not now?
Thwack, do the chateau a favor and make COGENT observations rather than the usual disingenuous n1663r-babble.
You know damn well things like Uncle Ben and Aunt Jemima are a far cry from the miscegenation rammed down the white public’s collective gullet these days.
I’m getting tired of shakin’ mah haid over your inanities, boy.
Serious question here: did you hear that Buckwheat from the Little Rascals converted to Islam? His new name is Kareema Wheat.
And on a side note, don’t you dare make any ridiculous claims about any particular group controlling the mainstream media… or you’ll never work in this town again.
Every time I see a commercial where they make a white man look dumb, timid, etc, I tell my 7-year-old son to not ever act like that guy. The hard-core explanations of why this is will follow with age. We all need to do this with our sons.
^ Exactly what I’m pointing out to my sons now that Game as a coherent philosophy has opened my eyes.
And how to neg girls.
No image is an accident. These things cost a fortune to produce and put on the air, and they are meticulously field tested and focus grouped.
Earlier this week I took part in a focus group for Pert shampoo. They showed the group 4 different storyboards that might become commercials:
1. Man on a safari, wearing a banana hammock, washing his hair on an elephant.
2. Man walking on a tightrope washing his hair in a banana hammock.
3. A group of pregnant men sitting in a maternity ward, which transitioned to a white man in a compromising position birthing a child while washing his hair.
4. A beauty pageant for homosexual white men competing for Mr. USA.
I made my disgust clear regarding 3 and 4. All the men with the exception of the lone homo in the group agreed with me. The homo actually asked me, in a self-righteous tone: Why are you so offended by these, is it a diversity issue?
lol The looks on the participants’ faces were priceless when I parried his PC jab.
The more I think about it the more I’m convinced this focus group was no about the shampoo.
I recently watched “Gone With the Wind” on TV and the black people that live in my parents’ neighborhood ARE like that with their houses, lawns, and children (and their Rottweilers).
I got frogmarched out of a well-known defense contractor when they had collected enough evidence of my chasing young skirts when I was ostensibly attaining a “CS” degree at the local university. I had an “ethics problem” according to HR. The day of my expungment I was boning some babe mid-afternoon when I could have been sitting in a windowless room engaged in an important meeting with my middle-aged co-workers, had I taken my career more seriously. Some time after my departure I looked on the company home page and their was the diversity team collection featuring a some photogenic employees and the obligatory black fellow, one of only three in the entire plant of 3000 people.
An edit function would be swell here.
How’d they collect evidence on you about this? Wild stuff. Also, never heard the term “frogmarched.” Sound funny and scary at the same time.
I was regaling the young fellas with tales of Ballroom Dance 101 in an attempt to recruit them as “leaders”. Need to keep the female/male ratio at least 70/30 or the gals will lose interest.
“Ballroom Dance 101″…haha…awesome!
It’s true isn’t it? If there is nothing to unify anyone, the country becomes minority controlled. My God, how could a small group of people who deny logic be so influential? How is it possible that just a few decades ago, nationalism was considered perfectly normal and now people go through a great deal of hand wringing and worrying to avoid appearing nationalistic? Also, I learned something exists called a “swag boy”. I need say nothing more.
Speaking of the USSA, the NYTimes is slowly introducing the idea of major limits on men’s 1st amendment rights. Right now it’s just a stupid article by a feminist professor saying cat calling should be illegal. Tomorrow, it’s something worse:
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/10/31/do-we-need-a-law-against-catcalling/street-harassment-law-would-restrict-intimidating-behavior
A future headline : “Racial Disparities in Harassment Law Enforcement Sparks Justice Department Investigation”.
Just wait till we get that new attorney general who is more of a racial divider than Holder.
Academia has a fetish for female academics, if you want to call them that. Their ability to write or think is less important than if they are a female with some sort of advanced degree.
Let’s all give the feminist professor @ProfLBNielsen a warm welcome to the red pill for her proposal to make ‘unwanted’ male speech illegal. I’ve already sent her a concerned email. If you’d rather not be ruled by Taliban-Feminists, I suggest you send her a concerned letter/tweet as well.
PA is wrong just the way the late Andrew Breitbart who believed the same thing was wrong. This is not anything new. Cultural Marxists are just Puritan culture “saved” who believe themselves to tiny flickers of lights in a world filled with wickedness, constantly searching out for witches. Ibsen, Munch and other Scandinavian artists are the flipside to total social/cultural conformity.
White people are engaged in a total, three-sided eternal cultural war (excluding Slavs) between Celts, Scandinavians, and “Romans” (state centralizers like Louis XIV, Napoleon, Frederick the Great). Right now its a Scandinavian-Puritan victory, but they never (Cromwell) last for long. This fight over how White people should live has been going on since approximately Julius Ceasar’s time and won’t end any time soon.
Diversity+Proximity = Celtic tribal ways of extreme personal autonomy; and you can’t build a great empire on African/Mexican/Muslim immigrants. So expect one hell of a fight soon among Whites. [Communism itself is Scandinavian culture writ LARGE. No extreme personal autonomy or State Glory of a Great Caesar there.]
Yes. Yes.
Cultural Marxists are just Puritan culture “saved.”
The Bolsheviks are EXACTLY the same thing as the Europeans who came over on the Mayflower.
Both the Bolsheviks and the Puritans loved Jesus and the teachings of Jesus, and formed churches centered about these teachings.
And both the Bolsheviks and Puritans murdered millions of Christians during the Russian Revolution while deconstructing and banning the church.
For, truly, Cultural Marxists are the same thing as Puritans and Saved Puritans, just as butthextxt bukkakkez nhentai pornz is the same thing as holy matrimony.
Dalrock preaches the same thing.
lzozoozozozoloozozoz
And both the Bolsheviks and Puritans murdered millions of Christians during the Russian Revolution while deconstructing and banning the church.
Well… there’s Cromwell in Ireland…
Whiskey, you spew this same tripe month after month and have been slapped down innumerable times over it… this time even by the venerable GBFM.
Cease the shillery already… you’re not fooling anyone, and you’re just making yourself more of a candidate for perdition.
Not to mention getting one in the yarbles when ere we meet… if’n ya got any yarbles, eunuch jelly thou!
lzozoozozozol
“When I grew up, my mother taught me that taking forty cockckakzzlozozolzk in da bung in an hentai gangbang where they all finsihed cummedz on her face is the *exact same thing* as holy matrimony. And I beleieved her.” –whiskeysplace
gotta watch for those sneaky scandinavians who run the media, governments, and financial systems to promote multiculturalism while setting up an ethno-state at home. i mean with all the ragnars and olaf names in positions of high power its amazing they can keep it under wraps so well. you would think people would have caught on by now!
and whiskey is a scots-irish lad
Sure, never heard of ASPAC american scandinavian public affair commity inceasingly lobbynig for bombing Italy
in order to prevent its secreat devellopment of weapons of mass seduction
Also, which state is better at keeping out turd-worlders? Sweden, or Israel? Q.E.D.
Another hot cyber turd from the resident creeper.
Yep…
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1RAUm6l_t6k
proposal:
split chat rooms, one for Arbiter and Zombie Shane to ramble and stumble over restoring whatever 70 year old social conventions they are railing about at the moment (Joos, Race, the way they wish the world was, ad infinitum).
and another for the normies on the board who like to game and deal with the world as it is.
Fuck off pansy. You’re in the wrong place if real talk gives you the vapors.
These Stark Reminders of Slavery Will Be Rebuilt on U.S. President’s Estate
Nov. 1, 2014 4:55pm Dave Urbanski
31
SHARES
Share ThisTweet This
Story by the Associated Press; curated by Dave Urbanski
WASHINGTON (AP) — Homes of slaves who served President James Madison at his Montpelier estate in Virginia will be rebuilt for the first time over the next five years, along with other refurbishments to the home of one of the nation’s Founding Fathers, thanks to a $10 million gift announced Saturday.
David Rubenstein, a leading Washington philanthropist and history buff, pledged the $3.5 million needed to rebuild the slave quarters next to the mansion in the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains. Another $6.5 million will be devoted to refurnishing parts of the home where Madison drafted ideas that would become the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Image source: YouTube
Image source: YouTube
After widow Dolley Madison sold the estate in 1844, many family belongings were dispersed or sold, leaving some rooms mostly empty of period furnishings after the estate opened to visitors in 1987. Now, curators hope to recover or borrow artifacts from the fourth president’s family life to bring the estate back to life, said Montpelier Foundation President and CEO Kat Imhoff.
Rubenstein told The Associated Press he wanted to help make the estate more authentic. Montpelier could draw more visitors to learn about history, he said, if the house is fully restored and its slave quarters built out. It currently draws about 125,000 visitors a year. Last year, Rubenstein gave funds to recreate slave quarters on Thomas Jefferson’s plantation.
“It’s this dichotomy. You have people who were extraordinarily intelligent, well-informed, educated; they created this incredible country — Jefferson, Washington, Madison — yet they lived with this system of slavery. Jefferson, Washington and Madison all abhorred slavery, but they didn’t do, they couldn’t do much about it,” he said. “We shouldn’t deify our Founding Fathers without recognizing that they did participate in a system that had its terrible flaws.”
The donation marks a trifecta of gifts totaling $30 million to projects at Virginia’s oldest presidential sites. Last year Rubenstein gave $10 million gifts to both Jefferson’s Monticello estate and George Washington’s home at Mount Vernon.
Recreating Montpelier’s South Yard, where domestic slaves lived, as well as the basement areas of the mansion where they worked, will help tell a fuller version of history, Imhoff said.
“For folks that have been coming to any of these presidential sites, the fact that we’re bringing this complete American story back into the landscape I think is very important,” she said. “It is challenging, but I also think it’s that wonderful tension that we as Americans are embracing, that this is our history, that making the invisible visible is very important to us as a nation, and it will make a stronger American story.”
The slave quarters at Montpelier were cleared away 165 years ago and planted over with grass, but the site has not been disturbed since. Archaeologists plan to excavate the South Yard in public view to recover remnants of slave life to help illustrate new stories.
Image source: YouTube
Image source: YouTube
One of the slaves who lived in a cramped dwelling was Paul Jennings. He was born at Montpelier in 1799, and at the age of 10 moved with the Madisons to serve in the White House. He later wrote a book about his experience, which is considered the first White House memoir. Jennings recalled helping Dolley Madison save curtains, silver, documents and a famous portrait of George Washington when the British burned the White House in 1814.
Jennings returned to Montpelier as Madison’s personal manservant. After Madison’s death, Jennings purchased his freedom and moved to Washington.
Matt Reeves, Montpelier’s director of archaeology, said his team can recreate the slave quarters close to their original construction through research from documents and excavations.
“By bringing the slave quarters back, what we’re able to do is tell the stories of the slave families that lived here and tell their more personal stories that allow visitors to imagine the enslaved community not as just workers, but as people, as mothers, fathers, aunts and uncles,” Reeves said.
Visitors now get an authentic experience at the front of the mansion and see the home inside as it was when Madison lived there, after a major $25 million architectural restoration completed in 2008, Reeves said. But as visitors leave the back porch, they see a 20th-century landscape of grass and trees, void of any evidence of the plantation where more than 100 slaves lived.
“It’s really going to bring this larger community back to life,” Reeves said. “It will really help define Mr. Madison as who he was — as a Virginia planter, as a slave owner.”
It isn’t about history, it is about furthering the Spielberg/Amistad race angst views. Note the way the person donating talks about the Founding Fathers and America – in a way that indicates he doesn’t view himself as being part of it, but a spectator outside of it. Why? We know why.
“Homes of slaves who served President James Madison at his Montpelier estate in Virginia will be rebuilt for the first time over the next five years, “
Inauthentic Fail. Needs slaves. Otherwise they’re just cute li’l cottages. Any volunteers?
I’m all up for multi culti, social Darwinism at its finest, let the slobs drench their snouts at the trough of privilege, history shows decadence is the harlot mother of weaklings. Gold is purified in fire and Heroes are forged in the divine fire of adversity.
What was Carthage, the Illyrians, Thracians, Greeks, Persians or Gauls to Rome compared to the dole?
The lefty is so enamoured by his success that he has unwittingly swallowed his own lies and deceit and sowed the seeds of his own destruction.
He is the divine agent of the Lords will, like Nebuchadnezzar before his purpose is to separate the wheat from the chaff and weed out the indolent. He is the saving grace of the Christian.
Where he thinks he is destroying he is in fact only culling the weak, where he thinks he is punishing he is in fact strengthening. When he floods the nation with immigrants he forgets steel sharpens steel and he is forging the steel which will crush his own head.
God bless the left and his blood thirsty quislings may his gullet be filled with blood of the unrighteous.