Feed on
Posts
Comments

PA (his blog here) delivers a swift uppercut to the triple chin of America’s gender blender equalists.

The difference between man and woman: the lion fights to the death for his cubs. The lioness goes into heat when an interloper kills her cubs.

The analogy that PA draws explains why women are more amenable than men to voting for politicians who will open the borders to mass quantities of alien races. It’s just a simple fact of sex differences that women come pre-installed with a submission algorithm that executes with a supine ferocity at the exact moment a stronger, more self-confident tribe of men overruns their own men wracked with doubt and enfeeblement.

Islam (president Gay Mulatto’s preferred religion of affinity) is the ultraviolent tribe currently laying waste to the West’s shibboleths, if not the West’s lands, but give it time…if enough shibboleths fall, the spiritually impoverished people of the West will cede their lands with barely a fight (and more likely than not with an excuse for why ceding territory is a moral imperative). And if the estrogenized transom is any indication, too many women are rushing to defend Muslim interlopers from whitemalepatriarchychristianbigotsgunlovingredneckbiblebeltthumpers. Western women are figuratively, and in some cases literally, going into heat for the marauding morlocks.

Does this mean women are innately treacherous? As a political question, maybe. But I would say as a judgment on their character, no, women are who they are: by nature maximizers of their reproductive fitness, and that means to save their valuable eggs they’ll submit to the men with the most passion for conquest. They know not what they do, iow, except how to survive in a world only superficially moved beyond its primal energies.

The answer to the Woman Question, as PA alludes, is for the men of the West to deny the interloper lions access to their lionesses. Accomplish that, and their women won’t feel compulsions to shift allegiance.

163 Responses to “Comment Of The Week: The Lion And The Lioness”

  1. Anonymous says:

    First! <– gay

    Like

  2. theasdgamer says:

    Western men failed a nuclear shit test long time ago–Women’s Suffrage. Hence, western women are now seeking access to invading men.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Ironpusher says:

    Obongo submitted to Islam long ago. They just slaughtered 50 of his sacred cattle and he responds in the predictable manner of attacking the 2nd Amendment. Refusing to acknowledge Radical Islamic Terrorism. It’s bordering on treason at this point, but what would you expect when you elect a mulatto named Barack Hussein Obama as President of the United States. Fortunately, we have the physical manifestation of white, male anger named Donald Trump to call him out on it.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. eyesfrontmen says:

    yes, but what to do when you have lionesses that kill their own cubs.

    Liked by 1 person

    • oink says:

      ha

      Like

    • ultimathule1 says:

      A friend of mine with a pitilessly clear and emotionless understanding of Darwinian selection explained to me once why he thinks abortion should remain legal: so that women who abort their own babies for the sake of mere convenience will thereby cause their own aberration to become extinct, which may possibly save one of my friend’s own descendants from having his family line ended by one of these women sometime in the future. The assumption here is that the abortion-for-the-sake-of-mere-convenience desire is hereditary, but we don’t yet know if this is true. Interesting thought, however.

      Liked by 2 people

    • she is clearly defective. dispose of it at once!

      Like

  5. Felix Krull says:

    I’m from Denmark, and I remember my history teacher in high school – a woman, of course – telling us about the Greenlanders’ expeditions to America. In one of the sagas, it’s related that while the men were out hunting, a war band of Indians came to the Greenlanders’ camp. One woman stepped up, bared her breast and lifted her tits up on a naked sword. The Indians fled in terror.

    My teacher was very fond of that incidence, exulting about female empowerment and such, a brave, Norsewoman scaring the savages away. I remember thinking that the story made no sense; why would she think that it would scare the Indians?

    While I still don’t know why the Indians fled, I’ve come to understand the gesture: “Okay boys, you won fair and square. Come get your reward.”

    Liked by 2 people

    • wolfie65 says:

      If the Viking lady in question looked anything like your average Hillary supporter or Walmart customer, I know exactly why the Indians turned tail and fled.

      Like

    • hans says:

      That´s the story the Norsewomen TOLD their men when they came back to slightly disheveled camp and even more disheveled women with odd satiated looks.
      And 9 month later all those slightly browner babies came rolling out.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        What are you, hans, some kind of cuck fetishist?

        Up until now you’ve been making the right noises, but the pains you took to elaborate on this side topic is an odd way for Germanic men to talk.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

    • Reb says:

      I call bullshit

      Like

    • tteclod says:

      The story the innings tell differs.

      The demons destroyed the injun village while the men were away, so the injuns returned the favor, killing all demons, save one who escaped with a demon infant. Finally, as the injuns were about to catch him, the demon tossed away his infant child. Sobbing with rage, he escaped in his canoe.

      I think both stories are self-serving myth.

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      It makes sense because the skraelings obviously thought the woman insane, and crazy people were “big magic” to most every Indian tribe, whom they studiously avoided.

      Like

    • Tam the Bam says:

      Seems to have been a garbled recollection of some sort of northwestern european warrior tabu, wagging your norks at the attackers to shame them, or absorb their masculinity or something. It does sound very much as though it’s actually “OK you win, molon labe, boys”. Probably impossible to fathom the strangeness of the pagan mindset from this distance now. The prehistoric Irish did it too.

      [Cuchulain] returns to Emain Macha in his battle frenzy, and the Ulstermen are afraid he will slaughter them all. Conchobar’s wife Mugain leads out the women of Emain, and they bare their breasts to him. He averts his eyes, and the Ulstermen wrestle him into a barrel of cold water, which explodes from the heat of his body.” – [LiePaedia]

      Like

  6. irishsavant says:

    The other requirement (apart from denying entry to the morlocks) is to reduce women’s political power. Quite apart from their Darwinian ‘treachery’ most have little strategic political or social perspective. They exist inside a bubble composed of friends and family (and I support that) and react on a short-term emotional level. This is catastrophic for our civilisation.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Belle Igerent says:

      I’ve realised something from dealing with women who, as a whole, are almost entirely enveloped in that Bubble you refer to. This can be reflected by observing women walking on the street texting, or on a call – they desperately need to be in contact with their social circle where they have standing and a modicum of influence. Facebook must be monitored st all times to endure stacy hasn’t put up a new photo, as missing a ‘like’ and ‘aww babez ur stunnin’ comment opportunity, could mean ostracisation from the clique.
      So force big bad white man to intrude into this carefully micromanaged feel good bubble is the ultimate insult, if he’s the

      Like

    • Belle Igerent says:

      for a* big bad white guy to intrude into this bubble is an insult if he’s the bearer of ill portents. (Remember this feel good bubble may be entirely sustained by anti depressants). If he brings news of refugees stabbing schoolmates (look up Lithuanian boy stabbed by Syrian) or one of the steady stream if rape stories, this super racist white bigot is fucking with the interior decorations of this bubble – ‘diversity is our strength’, religion of peace etc, that she feels haaaaapy to have contributed to with her support and micromanagement. Tell her that Muslim’s goal is the overturning of infidel empires, and they’ve a history of conquest by force, well you’re just a party pooper who’s denying her one of the accolades (caring samaritan) she’s worked hard to recreate society in her own image (love and peace for all, slogan slogan slogan). Attack the person not the issue – you’re the bad guy, not the muzrat who researched how to fatally stab before murdering the Lithuanian boy .
      Now, without saying men are problem solvers,at the very least men can recognise problems as they’re gestating. A woman doesn’t really have a big picture focus,so is very distrustful of a bad misogynist who points out developing trends – she can’t really accept the evidence infront of her face, as it doesn’t compute. Relativism ensues ‘muh white terrorists/brevik/NAMALT’. I can’t overlook the role jealousy plays as she realises that men will have to solve a problem that women have created while cunstructing society in thine own image (and where men are largely an irrelevant inconvenience)

      Like

  7. greginaurora says:

    I’d like to blame the women here, but it’s the Beta’s fault. Women are women. But the men trusted the women to act like men. They can’t, so they don’t.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bookooball says:

      No, betas aren’t the ones that naively gave women the right to vote. It is politicians that are naively thinking that pandering to women for votes won’t eventually end badly.

      They knew exactly what they were doing. Destroying the nuclear family. If you think otherwise, you underestimate your enemy and are the most naive of all.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. whorefinder says:

    Two days after the fairy jihad and you post some repeat of what a commie commenter said?

    After Trump nails—fucking nails it—in a speech today?

    I hope you Heartiste dudes are just too busy working for Trump’s campaign. That’s about the only excuse that would work that doesn’t involve a sick family member.

    Step up your game rape!

    [CH: breaking news events are more accessible to the CH brain trust through Twatter. come join the fun.]

    Like

  9. Ras al Ghul says:

    “Does this mean women are innately treacherous? As a political question, maybe. But I would say as a judgment on their character, no, women are who they are: by nature maximizers of their reproductive fitness, and that means to save their valuable eggs they’ll submit to the men with the most passion for conquest. They know not what they do, iow, except how to survive in a world only superficially moved beyond its primal energies.”

    You are mixing two things up here, whether they are innately treacherous (that is to say they are by their nature that way) and a lack of moral agency (they can’t help it, its the way they are). You are saying because they can’t help it, they aren’t treacherous, but that isn’t accurate, it in fact means that they are in fact poised for betrayal.

    Innate definition: inborn; natural.

    They are by their nature treacherous as you rightly note and yet shy away from it, they cannot help be that way, their prime directive is survival and reproduction, there is no other morality. It takes a supreme act of will, a strong external moral frame work, a society with powerful controls on them to prevent them from betraying kith and kin, or a male capable of maintaining control and as you point out, keep the interlopers away.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Sorcerygod says:

      How does the CBR handle on turns? My piece of shit Nighthawk — an already decrepit bike when I got it — slid on lubricated streets slick with rainwater on more than one occasion. Still, I want another motorcycle.

      Maybe a Ducati, once I get my prostitution ring up and running. So, in two months. I’ll keep updating my life story on my website *sighs, yes a plug*

      http://www.sorcerygod.wordpress.com

      Like

      • i don’t know, only because i rode two motorcycles as an adult. first was honda shadow spirit 750, my first bike back when i though i liked cruisers… 2 years later i was bored of it, though at first it seamed quick and nimble, later it felt like muscling with a cow. so i decided to get a light, nimble, quick super sport. debated between 1000 and 600. decided to get a 600 because shit… 120HP on a 385 LBS bike is just nuts! and it is! the bike is so light i can bounce it between my thighs when stopped at red (it helps that i can flat foot it, i’m 6’4″, about 180lbs, muscular physique… thanks to this forum and relentless 11 months of lifting inspired by this blog🙂 ) was concerned that it would be too small for me, but i’m actually much more comfortable on the CBR than i was on the shadow spirit! on weekends i’ll ride for 2-3 hours and i don’t get a sore back like i used to on the cruiser. bike fits me perfectly. and it’s great in turns compared to the cruiser, it’s a night and day difference. it just wants to fall into a turn and go. i dare to say it’s easier to ride than a cruiser. brakes are crazy strong. lane splitting is no problem. only issue compared to a 1000, i’m told, is that you have to hit higher RPM to wake up the beast. first few weeks i was afraid to go over 7-8k RPMs. a year into it and i’ll redline it often, it screams and pulls like crazy. i topped it at 140MPH once and it was still pulling HARD.

        i got it brand new, 2013 model, last year for my b-day. dealer had ’13, ’14, and ’15 on the floor and took 3K off of MSPR hehehe🙂 out the door 10K. i love this bike! oh, i almost got the 899 Panigale but decided that i can get better reliability, sexy looking bike, for almost half the price🙂 though at a cost of about 35HP… which frankly i don’t miss one bit. i don’t race on a track, only street/highway riding here in S. FL. and the lightness and nimbleness of a 600, combined with exceptional ergonomics… let’s just say i wouldn’t trade it for anything else! well, maybe except BMW S1000RR… i’ll probably add that to my garage in few years… wife want’s a BMW 228 convertable for 40th bday, so it will be a quid pro quo type of a deal🙂

        Like

  10. Colonel Hogan says:

    The new invaders aren’t better or stronger, just permitted access by the traitorous (((elite))). Once the power structure topples, the migrants will find themselves outmatched and in a foreign land, then try their best to scurry away. They can take any of the weak chics that sided with them. They won’t be missed.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Kind of delicious that the Democrats’ factions are eating and killing each other. The Muslim lobby, a major part of Obama’s platform killed 50 gay men, ANOTHER part of the Democrat platform and in true loyal fashion, Obama defended Islam. #Blacklivesmatter, a MAJOR constituent base hassled Sanders and interrupted Hillary and Bill on many occasions the past year as well as major #BLM distractions and violence on city streets and college campuses, said college campuses being yet another liberal faction. Liberal factions are at war with one another under the Democrat banner. Surreal.

    I often wonder, now that Islam settles in as a loyal Democrat faction and makes targets of gays and feminists on a regular basis, how it all shakes out. The gays supposedly, in AZ, went for Trump on their Facebook page, but that’s hardly fighting back. Truly fighting back means shooting up a mosque in retaliation. That’s how Muslims fight (each other, too, Shia/Sunni). But the homos don’t have that in them. When both sides are attacking each other, I suppose that’s the definition of civil war. Never happen and no thanks to the police, besides, the gays are too feminized and weak.

    Who will win? Who is stronger? Who will the Democrats in power actually pander to in the end? My money is on Islam as long as Democrats are in power. The Liberals will trade their gays and trannies in on Islam. Watch, it’s already happening. The Muzzies won’t stop unless and until THEIR people are being attacked in the same fashion.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sorcerygod says:

      Islam needs more protecting than gays because, in the context of white Western society, the Muslims are the weaker parter than the homosexuals, who have established themselves, I suppose, admirably.

      The liberal goal is to place enclosures/shelters/fortresses around maligned groups until they escalate in power. Thus, for a while the Jews were shepherded to greener pastures in the left-wing limelight, but when they firmly established (or perhaps usurped) the academic and entertainment industries, they were largely left to their own devices. Assuming the Muslims can thrive at some point in the distant future in America, they too will be left alone.

      Notice that the perennial disadvantaged group who can never leave their ethnic liberal fortress is the biggest failure entity of all: American negroes and their blasted inner cities.

      Liked by 1 person

    • > “But the homos don’t have that in them.” ——— I’ve been racking my brains trying to figure out how a D00n C00n could k!ll 50 men with a measly little 5.56mm peashooter, and my two theories are: A) Because the SWAT team waited three hours before they stormed the disco, the wounded s0d0mites bled out and d!ed? and/or B) The s0d0mites didn’t have the ‘nads to mount a counteroffensive, and the survivors huddled in fear as the D00n C00n walked around pumping more 5.56mm BBs into the wounded?

      Liked by 1 person

    • vfm#7634 says:

      The names of the dead have been released. They’re about 80% male (presumably all gay) and 75% Hispanic, and many of the non-Hispanics seem to have black names.

      That’s a lotta dead Diversity.

      Of course Zero and all the other shitlibs go right to demanding more gun control. Despite Bataclan and all the other gun-free zones.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Libertardian says:

      It’s been predicted here many times that the Left’s most rabid defenders were in for a rude awakening upon learning their real place in the victim pyramid caste system.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Libertardian says:

        Breitbart:

        ‘London’s first ever Muslim Mayor is set to ban images of ‘unrealistic’ scantily clad women from ads on public transport, which could see the city adopt some of the most censorious policies in the Western world.

        Sadiq Khan argued for the move by appropriating the language of feminism, claiming that alluring images of beautiful women could make them “ashamed of their bodies”.

        Ironically, the policy is likely to please both the misogynistic Islamist and prudish, third wave feminist, whose ends appear increasingly similar.’

        Reminds me of the Onion article “Japan Forms Alliance With White Supremacists in Well-Thought-Out Scheme”. It ends with what’s-his-name assuring the Japanese that he won’t wipe them out until last.

        Like

    • Moses says:

      I always was skeptical that Obama was really a Muslim. After seeing his daughter tape a quote from Muhammad on her mortarboard for graduation, I’m certain he is. No doubt.

      Liked by 1 person

  12. Captain Obvious says:

    > “Does this mean women are innately treacherous? As a political question, maybe… by nature maximizers of their reproductive fitness, and that means to save their valuable eggs they’ll submit to the men with the most passion for conquest…”

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      That guy’s name is Wolfgang Schauble, 73 [born 1942, during Der Fuhrer’s reign], and while he has four children of his own [three daughters & a son], I can’t find any evidence that he has GRANDCHILDREN:

      Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        So as regards “the men with the most passion for conquest…”, I’m wondering whether Wolfgang Schauble’s hindbrain fears that German men have become so hopelessly cucked that the only way he’ll get any grandchildren is if some Mohammedean r@pes one of his daughters and she decides to carry the pr3gnancy n!ne months through to the l!ve b!rth of a me1ungeon abomination?

        Liked by 1 person

      • wolfie65 says:

        Diavola Al-Merkeli’s entire cabinet is nothing but cucks, traitors, guilt-trippers and liars.
        And if you think there are too many Americans being raised as NiceGuyGentlemen, Germany is WAY ahead in that department.
        Or behind, depending on how you look at it…..
        On a side note, I caught part of DW News from Berlin today – your daily dose of liberal propaganda from Germany in English – and in their portrait of our good ol’ homegrown apple pie Mur’can boy, Omar, the shooter of lettuces, bacons, tomatoes and assorted other fruit, it said, clearly legible ‘licensed to carry guns’.
        Which should have read: ‘allowed to legally purchase guns’, an entirely different thing.
        Sloppy journalism or deceit ?
        Your call……

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        He was attacked and tabbed about 20 years ago that left him in a wheel chair. Its tough to be an Alpha when the daughters are whiping your ass.

        Like

    • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

      Former Finance Minister of Greece Yanis Varoufakis explains how the EU and in particular Germany (in part via Wolfgang Schauble) went about screwing Greece and sending a message to the rest of Europe.

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “we’re at the beginning of a 30 year war in Europe between Catholics and Calvinists…”

        huh?!?

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        can one of you scholars please tell me if there’s any truth to that Calvinists vs. Catholics trope?

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Yes there is. Calvinists are the prosperous northern European states and the Catholic ones are the Southern debtor states. CO doesn’t know that Calvinism is a yuuuuuuuge influence in the Pozzed parts of Northern Europe.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        thanks Carlos

        Like

  13. Sorcerygod says:

    I am looking forward to having one of my chick toys buy me a video camera so I can post seduction videos from real life of myself getting girls to have sex with me … that too will be on sorcerygod.wordpress.com!

    Like

  14. theasdgamer says:

    Reading about cubs online, apparently lionesses hide their cubs when a new male takes over a pride and the new king of the pride ends up “raising” the cubs…of course, the lionesses do the bulk of the actual hunting, so the contribution by the pride king to cubs is minimal.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Barry says:

      OT but a CH topic of low T men…reading Wilhelm Reich s book from 1932 The Sexual Struggle Of Youth and he believed that boys must have access to poon when they turn 18 as an important rite of passage to sexual maturity. If they don’t, anxiety disorders creep in, masturbation and sexual fantasies become more and more, pedestalizing of women occurs and the risk of homosexuality increases.
      If this rite of passage does not occur around this age, sexual matunity will never be achieved.
      This also explains why Himmler wanted his youth to mingle as much as possible with girls when they were as young as 16.
      I’d say today there is a huge percentage of boys in the West who do not have sexual access to poon as this age and essentially never grow up.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Vagina dominator says:

        William (((Reich))). Really? And do you have your own orgone accumulator?

        The problems of growing up as a man in the modern world have nothing to do with access to poon at an early age and everything to do with living life inside a propaganda machine that keeps men indoctrinated to a pre-pubescent dependence on the approval and validation of women.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        doesn’t any young man going to public school have access to poon from junior high school onward? even younger if he happens to have naughty neighbor girls who like to play doctor.

        Like

      • Marc says:

        Barry just happened to be reading Reich’s Sexual Struggle of Youth and wanted to share what he has learned with us all.
        Congrats, Barry — you’ve just won your very own Morgan Fairchild!

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “B✡rry”

        Like

      • Barry says:

        Captain Obvious you are ruinning this blog.
        You also seem thick as pig shit.
        (((Ivanka Trump)))
        (((Michael Cohen)))
        (((Donald Trump)))

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        That[s a big 10-4, B✡rry.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Heh, heh…

        (((Barry))) cites both a Reich and a Reichminister in the same post.

        Jew-fer two-fer. lzozlzozlzozlozlozlozlozlozl

        Ask not for whom the Tell tolls, (((Barry)))… it tells on thee.

        Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      References to presumed animal behavior on this blog – and many other places – contain poetic license in very large measure.
      Far as I know, male lions will defend their pride (read: females) against other male lions, but I don’t think they lift a paw in defense of their cubs.

      Like

    • Ripp says:

      I love how (((barrrrrrryyyyyy))) sanders wont stop repeating the Trump (((echo))) connection whenever upset. Total sperg.

      It’s likely that (((The Strapon Within))) and (((Barry))) are cut from the same yarmulke cloth…

      Put that guy in parenthesis and….hes been found out. lolz.

      Like

  15. Vagina dominator says:

    All of this is as PA says, yet we have PUAs insisting that mate guarding is beta, and along with that, violence is beta. But surely the lion protects what is his, and the lioness will go to the winner.

    Of course, if I looked like the average RSD PUA, I might make the same argument.

    Oh, I forgot. LOL.

    Liked by 1 person

    • 88 says:

      “we have PUAs insisting that mate guarding is beta, and along with that, violence is beta. But surely the lion protects what is his, and the lioness will go to the winner.”

      yep. appearing as though you are afraid that you may lose what is yours to someone else is mate guarding and beta but making it clear to interlopers what is yours and off limits to others is not.

      as a matter of fact, if you are not making that clear to others, that there will be repercussions if someone tries to take what belongs to you, you are being weak and fearful. that is the opposite of alpha.

      Like

      • oink says:

        Re: 88

        Great gun. If only the boys at the Don Bend would have had 100 or so of these fantastic weapons…

        Liked by 1 person

      • Corvo says:

        “making it clear to interlopers what is yours and off limits to others is not”

        Yes, it seems to me that the subtle but important difference is that the derided mate-guarding behavior appears nervous and female-focused (“I need to hold her hand! Remind her I luvs her! Keep her close to me! Keep her attention on me!”) while a stronger man implicitly treats his woman like property and for the most part ignores the woman (except to keep her hamster spinning with teasing banter and compliance tests) and subtly communicates directly to other men that he will fuck their shit up if they try something.

        It’s like that judge said about the difference between p0rn and art — it’s hard to define where the line it, but you know it when you see it.

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      That is because harems are the state of nature, not Spinning plates.

      Like

  16. George says:

    ‘He hated blacks, Jews & gays’ http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2016/06/daniel-gilroy-former-omar-mateen-coworker/

    Sounds like the Muzzie could have been posting on this blog…

    Like

  17. cortesar says:

    ((( ))) of the week

    Like

  18. It’s the beginning of the end for Hillary:

    Like

    • Vincent says:

      Dayum. Never thought I see that. As negroes say: “Sheeet.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • Libertardian says:

      Hillary backing down on Trump’s demands to say “Islamic terror” surprises me. When did you last see a leftoid do anything other than double down until they were dragged from the casino, bankrupt and crying?

      She lost as soon as Trump took ownership of the issue (by the simple expedient of putting the right name to it, which of course leftoids cannot do), but now she has effectively admitted that she dances to his tune just as Cruz did. As Pman said over on MPC, big mistake.

      As for zero, he should just resign. He’s clearly counting the days until he can start golfing full-time (in between the 6+-figure speaking engagements) anyway.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        ‘to say “Islamic terror” surprises’ ——— They must have run some quick flash polls, and seen the numbers, and were “terrorized” by what they saw. [Either that, or else they already had the polls in the bag, and they were simply waiting for an opportunity like this to distance themselves from Barry Soebarkah Dunham’s fecklessness.]

        Like

    • gumdeo says:

      Gays are beginning to understand that they are very disposable to the current elite.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        If true, that could be a profoundly important phenomenon for the Trumpening.

        Like

      • Libertardian says:

        We’ll never know, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump’s misspelling of LGBT was deliberate. In effect, it says: “Look, historically, LGBTWTFBBQ and the GOP have not been BFFs. But this isn’t the same GOP it was even a month ago – now it’s MY GOP. This election is about realigning the political spectrum. Hillary just threw you people under the bus. I’m not going to claim to love you, and I won’t let you in the girls’ bathroom unless you were born with the right equipment, but at least I won’t give your country away to third world invaders – and you just saw how they’re going to treat you once they’re running things.”

        Like

      • Libertardian says:

        Of course, the usual suspects are already frantically and loudly reassuring each other that LGBT groups have all rejected Trump’s cynical overtures. Whew!

        Like

      • Belle Igerent says:

        Hold your horsies fellas. I’ve seen the ((())) thrown around here for all sorts of reasons, but as they say, you can never expect the Spanish inquisition. In this case, you’re swallowing a lie whole – that lgbt phoenix account is fake, and it’s you’ve fallen for the pretty girl with the let’s make America great again lipstick.

        Like

    • JironGhrad says:

      That’s a fake account. On a phone, that’s an “i” not an “L”

      Like

  19. Rum says:

    Uncle die-ing. Gave me his Trap door Springfield. 1 qestn: Ofe thi cops furst?

    Di wurdprs, Di wurdpress.

    Like

    • Vincent says:

      What do law enforcement personnel that have stopped breathing on a permanent basis have to do specifically with certain types of brass cartridge using firearms from over 1 century ago? Just curious…

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        That’s just Rum up to his old Rube Goldberg method of distraction shilling.

        Whate’er you do, DON’T engage him in further conversation… the waters around the chateau are already squiddy enough.

        Like

  20. To deny them access to our lionesses we’re going to have to kill them, and that’s pretty much off-limits at the moment.

    Like

    • tteclod says:

      I hear you: nobody’s established a d3ath squad.

      Tha5 doesn’t keep us fr9m good old-fashioned religious & racial discrimination. You can never admit what you’re doing but you can stop talking to invaders, give nasty looks to their children, harass their women or – better – bed the ones who they’ll honor kill. Engage in little accidents in the parking lot, lunch room, restaurant.

      Do every little micro-aggression about which they complain. Remember: you’re a Nazi; fucking play the part. That’s what’s destroying their online safe places. Take it to their actual lives.

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        yes. reclaiming your country begins in the checkout line…for now.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Trouble is, most folk of good will can’t live like that… nor would want to live around others that behave that way.

        Guess we’ll just have to wait for a good ol’ fashioned permission slip to let slip the dogs of war.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Reclaiming begins at the dinner table, the pew and the classroom.

        Like

      • tteclod says:

        This is where the so-called “wacko” separatists have a distinct advantage: the dinner table, pew, and classroom are all contained under the same roof.

        Your dinner table is your own until wifey decides the single life is preferable.

        Your pew is your own – unless your church is hierarchical, in which case the pew belongs to the church: you just sit there.

        Your school belongs to your community, until the feds say otherwise, and when you organize private schooling, they find a way into that as well.

        Reclaiming begins everywhere, all the time.

        For the record, I needn’t re-claim my dinner table, I let the churches keep their pews, and the classroom is where my children bides their time and earn allies until instruction begins after school.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Reclaiming begins at the dinner table, the pew and the classroom.

        This is where is it begins and it’s cornerstone. This is where we let the enemy win through family destruction.

        Like

  21. Javier says:

    It’s a subconscious survival mechanism for women. It was the women who could make that emotional disconnect when the circumstances necessitated it who survived and lived to breed when their tribe was decimated by a superior force. This is also known as the War Bride dynamic; women develop an empathy with their conquerors by necessity. It helped women to cope with the harsh realities of the past, to develop a more focused sense of self-interest.

    Men are the disposable sex, women, the preserved sex. Men would simply die in favor of a superior aggressor, but women would be reserved for breeding. So it served a feminine imperative to evolve an ability to cut former emotional ties more readily.

    French women en masse ditched their front line fighting/POW husbands, had affairs with and got knocked up by the occupying German soldiers. +1 million babies were born to German soldier/French woman couples in Vichy France.

    Like

  22. stuttie says:

    @Javier – only difference, now our women vote in the kings & queens that are happy to lower the drawbridge and invite the enemy in with open arms.

    Like

  23. infowarrior1 says:

    What’s your opinion on the Kurdish women fighters? They seem to fight alongside their men against invaders.

    And take revenge rather than succumb to Stockholm syndrome in regards to ISIS fighters.

    Like

  24. tteclod says:

    Kill the interlopers. Take their women.

    Like

  25. Flubber says:

    Hillary:

    Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children.

    Like

    • Libertardian says:

      “World Ending, Women and Minorities Hardest Hit”

      The left is a parody of itself at this point.

      Like

  26. Observer says:

    “Does this mean women are innately treacherous? ”

    Studies show that women are less likely to put their personal desires aside in order to help their group. Women are also unwilling to take risks on behalf of their group. Women are loyal to close people who directly benefit them. Men, in comparison, are also loyal to people with common identity (their tribe).

    http://diversitymachtfrei.blogspot.bg/2016/05/the-problem-with-feminism-why.html

    Like

  27. oink says:

    no not ((Galician)) but offspring of popish subjects of Good Kaiser Franz from the area.

    But for Capt’n’s the fact that both ((tribe)) and noncucked popish see no redeeming feature in the modern centralized state is confusing. Cap’n has no beef with Moloch, he just wants Moloch to do HIS bidding.

    (a good example why for the whyte community to work crackers – like Capt’n will have to take a seat at the back of the whyte bus.)

    Like

    • Ripp says:

      Oink, the proper eskimo identification syntax is (((3))) parenthesis on either side of the subject. The compiler will return an error otherwise.

      Example:

      “The other day, cuckmaster (((Ben Shapiro))) was standing tall and proud at 4ft 14inches while being a cuck.”

      Like

  28. plumpjack says:

    MSM this morning pushing the “he was radicalized online” narrative HARD. laying the groundwork for legalislation to crack down on online (((((((((((free speech)))))))))))

    Like

  29. Yep. Men invade, women invite. Women don’t give a shit about mudhsarking or nationalism as long as they feel their mate is the best for reproductive success.

    You touched up on how we have created a superficial environment for ourselves – that is so true. Biomechanics still rule us. Civilization is a complete farce, to make us feel more “eVoLvEd.” It’s all egotistical. We still are just 10 thousand year old brains looking to survive and WIN.

    Like

    • Observer says:

      “Women don’t give a shit about mudhsarking or nationalism as long as they feel their mate is the best for reproductive success.”

      Yes.
      Men are tribal, women are relational.
      Among children and adolescents, female play-groups tend to emphasize close (and often dyadic) interpersonal interactions (with relatives, friends), while male play-groups emphasize coordinated teams and large groups (tribes). Mastering nature and the environment, something traditionally done by men, required emphasis on larger groups and coordinated teams (tribes). Finding (and keeping) a quality man and raising children, something traditionally done by women, required emphasis on close, often dyadic, interpersonal interactions. And now you know why women (who are relational) watch soap operas, while men (who are tribal) watch football.

      “Compared to men, women were significantly more likely to trust an
      outgroup member who shared a potential cross-group relationship connection. In addition, for women the level of trust toward an ingroup
      member and toward an outgroup member with a cross-group relationship connection did not differ; however, men trusted ingroup members
      significantly more than outgroup members regardless of cross-group relationship connections.”

      http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/22775/ssoar-gpir-2005-2-maddux_et_al-gender_differences_in_the_relational.pdf?sequence=1

      In other words: a woman will trust a lover or a friend who is not part of her group, in contrast, a man will not trust a lover or a friend who is not part of his group.

      Like

  30. Sentient says:

    I thought people weren’t celebrating? They were cheering all over, even this savage from Orlando. I was right. https://t.co/DrVa65X9rI

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 13, 2016

    LOL

    Like

  31. plumpjack says:

    Happy Birthday DT!

    LONG LIVE THE KING!

    Like

  32. Get yer guns boys. I ain’t gonna let a million years of Evolution get flushed down the toilet by some East German Whore.

    Like

  33. Johnny Redux says:

    I agree with your comments, CH, for the most part, What is very sad that White women would, under normal circumstances, run to the big, loud, tough conservative White males leading the anti-immigration charge, and even to the extreme right wing, for the protection that their calmer, laid-back, weak beta males cannot provide. Why do they not do so (at least in large numbers)? Because the governments in these nations are run by the Left, and have targeted White males to the right of the spectrum as a bigger enemy, a social disease, bigger than invading raping Muslims and Africans. So, the women, see that the strong White males are a targeted enemy, stay clear of them. Caught in the middle of helpless, limp-wristed, rule-following-to-the-death betas, and targeted for elimination by the government Alphas.

    Like

    • 88 says:

      sad but true.

      but there are still some women who are wise enough to be loyal to their own tribe (american nationals) they are the trump fans that you see out there. the women who are by nature, loyalists, family oriented, sensible about reality and what needs to happen for the greater good instead of irrationally selfish and only capable of thinking about what they think/feel in the moment instead of long term.

      those are the women to look for and settle down with. all the rest you’re better off leaving to die on the vine because any children you might have and raise with them would carry their weak genes anyway.

      Like

Leave a Reply