Where pretty lies perish.
Sep 3rd, 2015 by CH
This is sickening. Here we are, 2015 USA, and principled religious objectors are being tossed into jail over refusing to sanction deviance. The American Pilgrims escaped religious persecution to settle a new land and spark the creation of a great and free nation.
The irony is too rich for words.
Coconut oil by itself might get you to spf 7, which doesn't meet the FDA minimum threshold of spf 15 for adequate UV protection. Calcium carbonate as a texture additive might boost the spf a few points.
If you are prone to skin cancer, you should probably stick with the FDA approved sunscreens, 30 spf or higher.
Also, coconut oil is incredibly greasy. You like that feeling on a hot humid day? There are non-greasy sunscreen options that feel like talcum powder.
And yes, I know it's generally a good idea to get some unfiltered sun on one's skin.
Guess what these states all have in common?
Nigs?
They all voted for President Trump in 2024.
ffs
I would enjoy a public debate on the 2020 election fraud, but it should include the Kennedy election steal of Illinois in 1960, and the LBJ Senate election steal of Texas in 1948.
Air out all the dirty laundry and make it so that shitlibs can't keep going to the well of "election denialism".
Trump: "It was Iran"
Reality: "It was Israel and jewish influence in US politics"
"This is so terrible. Anyhow...."
I think it can get bad enough, but by that time Whites will be too outnumbered and scattered to effectively rescue themselves.
This was the idea behind accelerationism: to make it bad enough soon enough, before it's too late to do anything.
I would gladly trade my vote for a real nation stewarded by my beneficent peers.
Catch: At the first sign of disloyalty, heads roll.
Ain't democracy grand?
A Flock of Siegals
I for one believe that discrimination is good. Discernment in everything. Exclusivity maintains high standards. White society as a whole benefits when agents of corrosion are shunned.
Of course, what this means in practice is that eventually Whites will have to discriminate against the Fievel Boss, and if you press online "rightoids" on this topic, they will shy from the implications of their happy prejudice against nonwhites and perverts leading to the pyramid top of racism against jews.
Christianity sowed the seeds for its own destruction with all that stuff about not judging and everyone being equal before Christ. Tolerance always seems to hold the door open for the intolerant to take over. Fatal flaw in Libertarianism, too.
Don’t worry, though. The Muslim ‘refugees’ will put a stop to this degeneracy in a few decades.
lzozozozolz
lzlozozolzoz
lzlozllzo
zlzozoozzolz
lzlozlzlozo
lzozozollzolz
Benjamin Rush
SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE; SURGEON GENERAL OF THE CONTINENTAL ARMY; RATIFIER OF THE U. S. CONSTITUTION; “FATHER OF AMERICAN MEDICINE”; TREASURER OF THE U. S. MINT; “FATHER OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION”
The Gospel of Jesus Christ prescribes the wisest rules for just conduct in every situation of life. Happy they who are enabled to obey them in all situations! . . . My only hope of salvation is in the infinite tran¬scendent love of God manifested to the world by the death of His Son upon the Cross. Noth¬ing but His blood will wash away my sins [Acts 22:16]. I rely exclusively upon it. Come, Lord Jesus! Come quickly! [Revelation 22:20]97
I do not believe that the Constitution was the offspring of inspiration, but I am as satisfied that it is as much the work of a Divine Providence as any of the miracles recorded in the Old and New Testament.98
By renouncing the Bible, philosophers swing from their moorings upon all moral subjects… It is the only correct map of the human heart that ever has been published.99
[T]he greatest discoveries in science have been made by Christian philosophers and . . . there is the most knowledge in those countries where there is the most Christianity.100
[T]he only means of establishing and perpetuating our republican forms of government is the universal education of our youth in the principles of Christianity by means of the Bible.101
The great enemy of the salvation of man, in my opinion, never invented a more effective means of limiting Christianity from the world than by persuading mankind that it was improper to read the Bible at schools.102
[C]hristianity is the only true and perfect religion; and… in proportion as mankind adopt its principles and obey its precepts, they will be wise and happy.103
The Bible contains more knowledge necessary to man in his present state than any other book in the world.104
The Bible, when not read in schools, is seldom read in any subsequent period of life… [T]he Bible… should be read in our schools in preference to all other books because it contains the greatest portion of that kind of knowledge which is calculated to produce private and public happiness.105
Roger Sherman
I first heard about the Illuminati from my J-wish roommmate in college. I laughed at him then too. Now I wish I could meet him again and trade notes. So take that David Pakman.
hey herartssteitsstee!!!! HEATRISTSTES!!!
great nesws!
da gbfm is finally featured in a gallery on a wallll!!!!
my portrait had to be shrunk and cropped to fit zlzoozozozolz
American zzoz have had low birth rates and high rates of out-marriage; which is another way to extinct an identity, for several generations now.
Discuss.
There are not many women named “Candy”.
If I die tommorrow; no complaints…
lzozozolol
lzozozloolz
Thomas Jefferson
SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE; DIPLOMAT; GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA; SECRETARY OF STATE; THIRD PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend all to the happiness of man.63
The practice of morality being necessary for the well being of society, He [God] has taken care to impress its precepts so indelibly on our hearts that they shall not be effaced by the subtleties of our brain. We all agree in the obligation of the moral principles of Jesus and nowhere will they be found delivered in greater purity than in His discourses.64
I am a Christian in the only sense in which He wished anyone to be: sincerely attached to His doctrines in preference to all others.65
I am a real Christian – that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus Christ.66
That’s not a Deist, that’s a believer who doesn’t like church.
He’s a Christian Deist.
Kim Davis calls you a moron from her jail cell.
James Madison
SIGNER OF THE CONSTITUTION; AUTHOR OF THE FEDERALIST PAPERS; FRAMER OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS; SECRETARY OF STATE; FOURTH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
A watchful eye must be kept on ourselves lest, while we are building ideal monuments of renown and bliss here, we neglect to have our names enrolled in the Annals of Heaven.71
I have sometimes thought there could not be a stronger testimony in favor of religion or against temporal enjoyments, even the most rational and manly, than for men who occupy the most honorable and gainful departments and [who] are rising in reputation and wealth, publicly to declare their unsatisfactoriness by becoming fervent advocates in the cause of Christ; and I wish you may give in your evidence in this way.72
lzololzlzlzol
lzolzozozoz
I just watched it. Hard hitting, first rate.
It’s easy to forget that white women are the second-most-right-wing group of people defined by race and sex after white men.
Meh…. unless a white woman is producing white babies, she is not doing the primary thing she can do to preserve the race.
Without babies, more female white nationalists are just angling for beta orbiters.
It’s easy to forget that white women are the second-most-right-wing group of people defined by race and sex after white men.
You would not wish to be judged by my wife. If I felt a shred of mercy for you, I would try to prevent it for your sake.
Strapon2 chimes in again, trying to put a damper on all things related to White RealTalk.
If you want children, please plan in advance how you will raise them and what you will teach them. Choose a mother based on a common philosophy. You may have to take a chance and speak your mind like a man. A woman worth exploring will respond positively. For example, see the recent thread on how fourteen eighty eight was a great year for raising young women. It will make Libtard women melt like the Wicked Witch of the West in water.
It will hit 50,000 views within the hour, and that’s the J-tube count. That’s viral for a WN production.
No, that’s how dumb fuck equalists interrupt the text through their lense of social justice. Classic case of being so indoctrinated that you don’t have the language/ thought patterns to see the plain clear truth.
The seminal parable of the talents of Matthew 25 makes it clear that humans are not at equal in abilities but are responsible for what they are given. Basically the exact opposite of everyone being equal in ability and earthly worth.
The equality talked about in the Christianity is that people’s individual eternal souls are equal and that you will be judged according to what you were given.
One of the very most important things about this blog and I dare say, Matt King, is the ability to hear these old arguments against immoral behavior that were commonplace 100 years ago but are now censored by ommission to the point people never knew they existed and are intellectually incapable of countering the left wing arguments or rather, groundless assertions, they are fed non stop.
Sometimes you have to throw over tables too.
To quote Nick Steves, it’s not a matter of doctrine, but about evolving memetic culture. The radical progressives running rampant in the West aren’t Christians, but their ideology grew out of Christian culture.
When you say “grew out of”, you’re playing the Cathedral game of putting Christianity in a poor light… because most people will read “grew out of” as “natural progression” and “served as the basis of”, when nothing could be further from the truth.
What Satan, with his Cathedral, has done, is put God in a poor light by usurping and corrupting Scripture… NOT because they respect it and moved it along to its natural evolution… but because the devil and his minions have a special skill of appearing as angels of light, when need be, to delude Mankind.
The devil can quote Scripture with the best of them, which is why Jesus and Michael did not bother to play his game and debate him… they simply dismissed him with a get-thee-behind-me and may-the-Lord-rebuke-you.
I don’t understand how people don’t get this. None of the Christians understood “don’t judge,” to mean “don’t form moral judgments or defend moral values.” Elsewhere, both Jesus and St. Paul uphold excommunication and teach that the State should punish immoral and criminal persons. Moral judgments are repeatedly made throughout the New Testament. The only thing Jesus’ words meant to Christians for almost 2000 years, was: “When it comes to your spiritual life, do not preoccupy yourself with the failings of others; fix yourself first.” When it came to maintaining basic standards of moral decency in a country or community, they upheld moral judgments and encouraged the idea that immoral and wicked persons be shunned and/or killed.
The modern mis-application of “don’t judge” is obviously a disingenuous ploy used by liberals *against* Christianity; not anything that (real) Christianity has itself ever believed or tolerated.
+1. Thank you…. good to know there are still a few out there who “get it”.
But sadly there is little “real Christianity” to be found, at least in Churches.
All successful radical ideologies in the west owe a debt to Christian messianism. They are Christianities without the Christ.
These literally demonic corruptions proclaim the ends of Christianity — because those ends are true: universalism, eschatology, self-sacrifice — but adopt a militant “by any means necessary” strategy that ultimately destroys them, under the pretense of “If you want to make an omelet, you have to break some eggs.”
Their false proclamation of true principles are used as the fig leaves to conceal their real ends, which are self-aggrandizement and power. The lies at the heart of their strategy ensnare many otherwise good but simple people, who rightly agree with the ends while closing their eyes to the means. Hence the wildly ignorant reinterpretation of Christianity through the lens of Leninism — the only understanding of Christianity these dweeby millennial edgelords know.
Christ is the way, the truth, and the life. He does not merely speak truth, he embodies it. The most effective lies are 99% truth. Yes, The Enemy knows this.
Matt
Pope Francis is an excellent example of the naif I’m talking about, who is theologically ignorant and seeks alliance with the pawns of evil because the liars told him they all ultimately want the same thing.
But we are enjoined to seek first the kingdom of God, and only after will “all these things be added unto you.” Those who get fixated on the “added” are puppets of the Father of Lies.
Well, one still needs to follow the law. She took an oath of office after all. It’s one thing to stand up for your beliefs, quite another to impose them on others. She could always resign.
[CH: yes, the law.
the law is an ass.]
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” – John Adams
lzolzolzlzol
lzozzlzlo
John Adams
SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE; JUDGE; DIPLOMAT; ONE OF TWO SIGNERS OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS; SECOND PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.1
Without religion, this world would be something not fit to be mentioned in polite company: I mean hell.2
The Christian religion is, above all the religions that ever prevailed or existed in ancient or modern times, the religion of wisdom, virtue, equity and humanity.3
Suppose a nation in some distant region should take the Bible for their only law book and every member should regulate his conduct by the precepts there exhibited. . . . What a Eutopia – what a Paradise would this region be!4
I have examined all religions, and the result is that the Bible is the best book in the world.5
lzozozozozozo
lolzolzlzlzl
Samuel Adams
SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE; “FATHER OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION”; RATIFIER OF THE U. S. CONSTITUTION; GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS
I . . . [rely] upon the merits of Jesus Christ for a pardon of all my sins.9
The name of the Lord (says the Scripture) is a strong tower; thither the righteous flee and are safe [Proverbs 18:10]. Let us secure His favor and He will lead us through the journey of this life and at length receive us to a better.10
I conceive we cannot better express ourselves than by humbly supplicating the Supreme Ruler of the world . . . that the confusions that are and have been among the nations may be overruled by the promoting and speedily bringing in the holy and happy period when the kingdoms of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ may be everywhere established, and the people willingly bow to the scepter of Him who is the Prince of Peace.11
He also called on the State of Massachusetts to pray that . . .
the peaceful and glorious reign of our Divine Redeemer may be known and enjoyed throughout the whole family of mankind.12
we may with one heart and voice humbly implore His gracious and free pardon through Jesus Christ, supplicating His Divine aid . . . [and] above all to cause the religion of Jesus Christ, in its true spirit, to spread far and wide till the whole earth shall be filled with His glory.13
with true contrition of heart to confess their sins to God and implore forgiveness through the merits and mediation of Jesus Christ our Savior.14
lzozozozoo
John Jay
PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS; DIPLOMAT; AUTHOR OF THE FEDERALIST PAPERS; ORIGINAL CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE U. S. SUPREME COURT; GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK
Condescend, merciful Father! to grant as far as proper these imperfect petitions, to accept these inadequate thanksgivings, and to pardon whatever of sin hath mingled in them for the sake of Jesus Christ, our blessed Lord and Savior; unto Whom, with Thee, and the blessed Spirit, ever one God, be rendered all honor and glory, now and forever. 55
Unto Him who is the author and giver of all good, I render sincere and humble thanks for His manifold and unmerited blessings, and especially for our redemption and salvation by His beloved Son. . . . Blessed be His holy name.56
Mercy and grace and favor did come by Jesus Christ, and also that truth which verified the promises and predictions concerning Him and which exposed and corrected the various errors which had been imbibed respecting the Supreme Being, His attributes, laws, and dispensations.57
By conveying the Bible to people . . . we certainly do them a most interesting act of kindness. We thereby enable them to learn that man was originally created and placed in a state of happiness, but, becoming disobedient, was subjected to the degradation and evils which he and his posterity have since experienced. The Bible will also inform them that our gracious Creator has provided for us a Redeemer in whom all the nations of the earth should be blessed – that this Redeemer has made atonement “for the sins of the whole world,” and thereby reconciling the Divine justice with the Divine mercy, has opened a way for our redemption and salvation; and that these inestimable benefits are of the free gift and grace of God, not of our deserving, nor in our power to deserve. The Bible will also [encourage] them with many explicit and consoling assurances of the Divine mercy to our fallen race, and with repeated invitations to accept the offers of pardon and reconciliation. . . . They, therefore, who enlist in His service, have the highest encouragement to fulfill the du¬ties assigned to their respective stations; for most certain it is, that those of His followers who [participate in] His conquests will also participate in the tran¬scendent glories and blessings of His Triumph.58
I recommend a general and public return of praise and thanksgiving to Him from whose goodness these blessings descend. The most effectual means of securing the continuance of our civil and religious liberties is always to remember with reverence and gratitude the source from which they flow.59
The Bible is the best of all books, for it is the word of God and teaches us the way to be happy in this world and in the next. Continue therefore to read it and to regulate your life by its precepts.60
[T]he evidence of the truth of Christianity requires only to be carefully examined to produce conviction in candid minds… they who undertake that task will derive advantages.61
Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation, to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.62
QUITE ANOTHER TO IMPOSE THEM ON OTHERS.
Oh, the irony!
When the law said that sodomy was illegal, I guess one needn’t follow the law, eh?
And what would you call it, if not an imposition… indeed, the greatest imposition… by the queer nation, and the atheist minority before them, in imposing their collective will on the majority?
Let’s chisel those words in stone within the Supreme Court, to replace the erstwhile Ten Commandments.
If you think the Founding Fathers meant for the Supreme Court and the MSM to rule this nation, you have another think coming.
And we have another nation coming.
Til then… avaunt, thou fairies!
Actually, keeping sodomy illegal but unenforced was a great compromise because it gave both people what they really wanted. This is about the Left slapping Christianity in the face too, which was intended all along. It is meant to place the state in opposition to the church and render all believers outlaws. That is its true purpose above all. Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, all of the leading Bolsheviks, were all Freemasons too.
Her opinion is that she is following a higher law than the corrupt law of man.
If many others do the same, then you might see things change.
Nope. It’s called civil disobedience. People of conscience refuse to obey unjust laws, and the state responds with clumsy brutality. This weakens the legitimacy of the state. It works.
The left responds to all dissent with unhinged narcissistic rage, so people of conscience will be getting a lot more chances to perform this little morality play. Good.
“weakens the legitimacy of the state. It works.”
Amen.
Well-said… but your snipe about the Pilgrims below was ill-measured.
Well-said… but your snipe about the Pilgrims below was ill-measured.
Those “Pilgrims” were the original Yankees, the same ones that wanted to canonize John Brown and plow salt into Southern ground for the sin of slavery. We don’t think much of them in the South either, but I get your point.
For Liberty, Freedom and Glory, the watchwords of they that would go, to the sound of the drum and bugle to vanquish the Federal foe…
Southern Soldier’s Farewell
When folks snipe about Pilgrims, it’s seldom a barb merely at the rabid fundamentalists… it’s more often a swipe at the entire “founding faith”.
Understood and never my intention.
waiting for the court to issue an arrest warrant for Obama for completely disregarding immigration law
“It’s one thing to stand up for your beliefs, quite another to impose them on others. She could always resign.”
and they could always go to a different state. see how that works? or is this “imposing beliefs” a one way street?
She *is* following the law.
one still needs to follow the law
yes, and we “have” one, DOMA… Why wasn’t the Supreme Court curtly impeached … oh , yes, because Congress really doesn’t count.
Oh well, wait until the start of hangings of heretics from POZ. Cannot be that far.
Impose your beliefs? Like arrest her for not standing for disgusting sickos pretending they are like normal couples?
That’s the thing – instead of firing her for not doing her job, they are trying to make an example of her.
Yes! Why not just fire or dismiss her. Jailing for not issuing marriage licenses? While all Goldman ‘sacks’ men walk free?
Agreeing with her views or not misses a huge point.
Jail????
She can’t be fired. She’s an elected official, not an appointee.
One needs to follow the law?
At what point does one no longer need to follow the law? What does it take to ignore the law? Raping little white girls by the hundreds and thousands as in Rotherham and Oxford? Invading hordes of “refugees” which are 90% men? Targeting and killing whites and white cops?
When will you decide it is ok for you to break the law with rigorous equality as those who are out to destroy tou.
Ah, sounds like you haven’t actually read about King Nebuchadnezzar then.
Or perhaps disagree….
Lemme see if I understand…
When it comes to “gay marriage:” God grows wroth with those dumb enough to pretend it exists, Reason rejects it, all societies have scorned it, the USA never had it, it always failed when put to a vote and the state of Kentucky specifically legislated against it.
Yet after a handful of apostates and Jews (including a Spic and at least one sodomitical pervert) wave their magic wand, it is a “law” and Kim Davis is the one guilty of “imposing her views” on others? Is that about right?
I don’t recall Obama resigning after ignoring immigration law for the past 7 years, along with everything else. Nor do I recall any mayor of any sanctuary city resigning for ignoring immigration law either?
Great summary of the cuckservative’s approach to war. The enemy breaks oaths, ignore laws, shits on our venerated founding documents — attains its goal by any means necessary.
Meanwhile we self-righteously uphold old standards and are shocked and appalled that the feral opposition aren’t moved to disarmament by our heartfelt grammar-school accusations of hypocrisy. Reid dismantled the filibuster to get the result he wanted. McConnell reinstated it on principle.
The faggot right would rather never have power than to gain it hypocritically. That’s why they will be losers to the end. They are worse than the enemy; they are cowards, false friends, quislings. They have to be surgically removed from the body politic, or failing that, gnawed away with the growling jaws of animals.
Crap. The Pilgrims were the ancestors of the totalitarian cult that put this brave fat lady in jail.
The Pilgrims wanted religious freedom for themselves and exactly nobody else. They tolerated zero dissent in their colony.
George Washington
JUDGE; MEMBER OF THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS; COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF THE CONTINENTAL ARMY; PRESIDENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION; FIRST PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES; “FATHER OF HIS COUNTRY”
You do well to wish to learn our arts and ways of life, and above all, the religion of Jesus Christ. These will make you a greater and happier people than you are.121
While we are zealously performing the duties of good citizens and soldiers, we certainly ought not to be inattentive to the higher duties of religion. To the distinguished character of Patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian.122
The blessing and protection of Heaven are at all times necessary but especially so in times of public distress and danger. The General hopes and trusts that every officer and man will endeavor to live and act as becomes a Christian soldier, defending the dearest rights and liberties of his country.123
I now make it my earnest prayer that God would… most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to do justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility, and pacific temper of the mind which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion.124
You’ve got some quality content GBFM. Love it.
GBFM, I can think of a large number of Catholics and Presbyterian Calvinists who spit on the ground at the mention of Pilgrims.
Fool… you think any cohesive and successful tribe tolerates dissent in the ranks? Especially when times are hard and survival is first order of business?
You fuckin’ sophomoric asses need a good lesson in not knowing where your next meal is coming from.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
Pretty sure he meant that Puritans were intolerant fucks even by those standards.
I know his meaning… a very mean meaning.
And for the record, I don’t need no shitlib NOR Muzzie telling me about “intolerant fucks”… especially along the lines of Cathedralese slander against the White folks who founded this country.
Here’s what God Himself says about “tolerating dissent”:
Proverbs 6:
16
There are six things the Lord hates,
seven that are detestable to him:
17
haughty eyes,
a lying tongue,
hands that shed innocent blood,
18
a heart that devises wicked schemes,
feet that are quick to rush into evil,
19
a false witness who pours out lies
and a person who stirs up conflict in the community.
Now that you have been made wise, go and sin no more.
God didn’t write that. Humans did.
You call yourself “The Spirit Within” but what do you mean by that? Perhaps you could educate us all.
If a spirit resides in you, what is its role with regard to the non-spiritual you?
Does your spirit rule the non-spirit or vice versa?
Or do the two consult on a case-by-case basis and then proceed upon a show of hands?
Forget it. I don’t expect a reasonable answer.
The spirit within you is just a hamster.
“Spirit” is a cryptic term that the readership has come to understand to be an anal insertion object.
The eskimo within.
God didn’t write that. Humans did.
So much for that alleged Catholic upbringing. :duckface
StraponWithin is like the rock that gets tossed into the air and thinks it can fly.
Avaunt, impious fool. Thy anal cavity runneth over.
God wrote that through the natural law of the universe.
Isolate from the group those who are a menace for it is a common strategy to survive, and then they have right to set their own self destructive group.
If you don’t do it you will become extinct over the time.
My earliest American ancestor crossed the Atlantic in the 1630s. He was a Quaker who was “disenfranchised” by the Puritans for being a Quaker.
It is important to note, however, that the Puritans and the Pilgrims were separate people. Until 1692, Plymouth Plantation and Massachusetts were separate colonies. Eventually, the Pilgrims fell to Puritan conquest. The Puritans, not the Pilgrims, were the ancestors of the totalitarian death cult that utilizes all means available to achieve the death of western Civilization.
And I’d like to think that even those very ancestors, if they could see what they have wrought, would change their minds. If you could somehow show 21st century America through the eyes of tumblr and facebook to Sigmund Freud, Karl Marx, or Moses Maimonides, those men would giggle with delight. Show the same picture to Cotton Mather, and he would probably abandon Calvinism.
Good post. I have a long one in mod that makes a similar point.
No, it’s not a good post… it repeats the same ol’ tired shibboleths against “Puritans” and wrongly equates their behavior… indeed, their ideology… to the Satanic children about which Christ warned us.
Truly, you fucks have got to get off this jew-jitsu disingenuosity of laying today’s malaise off yesteryear’s Puritans… merely because George Carlin and South Park told you they were big meanies who made people keep their dicks in their pants.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
[…] By CH […]
John Witherspoon
SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE; RATIFIER OF THE U. S. CONSTITUTION; PRESIDENT OF PRINCETON
[C]hrist Jesus – the promise of old made unto the fathers, the hope of Israel [Acts 28:20], the light of the world [John 8:12], and the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth [Romans 10:4] – is the only Savior of sinners, in opposition to all false religions and every uninstituted rite; as He Himself says (John 14:6): “I am the way, and the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father but by Me.”136
[N]o man, whatever be his character or whatever be his hope, shall enter into rest unless he be reconciled to God though Jesus Christ.137
[T]here is no salvation in any other than in Jesus Christ of Nazareth.138
I shall now conclude my discourse by preaching this Savior to all who hear me, and entreating you in the most earnest manner to believe in Jesus Christ; for “there is no salvation in any other” [Acts 4:12].139
It is very evident that both the prophets in the Old Testament and the apostles in the New are at great pains to give us a view of the glory and dignity of the person of Christ. With what magnificent titles is He adorned! What glorious attributes are ascribed to him!… All these conspire to teach us that He is truly and properly God – God over all, blessed forever!140
[I]f you are not rec¬onciled to God through Jesus Christ – if you are not clothed with the spotless robe of His righteousness – you must forever perish.141
[H]e is the best friend to American liberty who is the most sincere and active in promoting true and undefiled religion, and who sets himself with the greatest firmness to bear down profanity and immorality of every kind. Whoever is an avowed enemy of God, I scruple not to call him an enemy to his country.142
As another commenter said a while back, if God doesn’t punish America, he owes Sodom and Gomorrah an apology.
All State-Sponsored marriage is now Faggot-Marriage. A State-Sanctioned “Wedding License” is State-Sponsored butthexting of your bride.
When the State inserts itself into your marriage, it also inserts itself into your anus and into wife, making you a Cuck.
Do not participate in State-Sponsored Cucking of yourself.
There’s a reason this blog gets commentators like da GBFM lzzzzzzzlzlz (TM). Fucking obsessive psycho.
[CH: the left is driven into a narcissistic rage by principled dissenters. yes, i like that.]
Gainsay what he says… THEN you can talk shit about the man himself.
Half-wit.
you misspepplelled lzzzzzzzlzlz !!!
u big dummeiss!!!
it’s lozlzlzlzlzoozlzozlzozozmzgzozzozoolzolz or lzozlzozozllzoozoz for short!
Truth in beauty.
What’s the alternative? Let her keep breaking the law forever?
[CH: the breakings shall continue until morale improves.]
. . . As will the jailings.
[CH: martyrs to the cause.]
Notice how the shitlibs suddenly become champions of Law & Order.
lzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlozlozlozlozlozlozl
[CH: shitlibs have raised hypocrisy to an art form.]
There are millions of hypocrites on both sides of the aisle. “Conservatives” are just as bad, if not worse.
[CH: nah, most hypocrites today are leftoids. see any race demographic of liberal swpl super zips.
anyhow i was talking about raising hypocrisy to an art form, which leftists have managed to do. i wasn’t saying there were NO hypocrites on the right.
but as usual you are a disingenuous, strawmanning, red herring throwing, rhetorically evasive shitlib, so you got that going for you.
which is gay.]
Depends on the law, of course.
If it’s an SJW law, then “the law is the law!”.
If it’s an intolerant shitlord law, then “the law must be changed zomg!”
Exactly. Where wete the shitlibs when the law was segregation?
My lunch counter -I choose who sits there.
StraponWithin swoops in again… for yet another ass-whuppin’.
(((shakin’ it)))
“Notice how the shitlibs suddenly become champions of Law & Order.”
Exactly, none of them say – well that fucking Rosa Parks had it coming, why didn’t she just “follow the law” and move on back…
i’ve got yer law right here, punk.
muh law
A court invents a law via an absurd interpretation of the Constitution, then jails someone on contempt of court. The lady should reply, “ive been given no lawful orders to comply to”.
On a positive note, I was thinking the other day that at some recent point, the Liberal State is on an irreversible if not very perceptible at this time slide into oblivion.
This collapse of the moral legitimacy, the popular appeal of, general consent to and apparent permanence of 1954-launched Liberal project began with the acquittal of one George Michael Zimmerman by the jury of the 18th Judicial Circuit Court in Seminole County, Florida on the 13th of July, 2013.
No, that just means they’re going to have to become more severe in their methods of enforcement.
The more severe they become, the more legitimacy they lose. They’re on the road to morphing into a Stalinesque universally hated regime.
How many Americans will survive its gulags is a whole different matter. But at least this transformation will destroy any cultural appeal of this hellish ideology abroad, containing it within the slowly rotting corpse of once was a free nation.
This little fat lady has become Joan of Arc. I had always felt that the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage might have been the battle that lost the war. I have started to notice that defiance began to rise. Confederate flags being flown in upstate New York and all over the north, the level of defiance rising on social media.
This is going to be huge. This woman will not back down. And the outcry from the majority will rise up. This woman drew a line in the sand in a way that no cuckservative Republican politician dared. And the discussion of civil war, of uprising, of coup has never been higher. People are starting to literally begin to accuse the governments of the west and the Cathedral of collusion and conspiracy against its own peoples, and even of treason.
I have been doing research, and my advise to you is to search for this term “80% ar 15 lower” and get ready. Once you start reading about it, you’ll understand what I mean. And you better do it now while you can, even if you do nothing with it but stick it in a box in the ground. There is a whole community out there to teach and help you with this endeavor.
There are some states where you can still buy a rifle (or said AR lower in complete state, without the need for machining) from a private person…
The State be none the wiser as to who gots what… until they do some digging and tracing, if it comes to that… and if said private person who sold the rifle privately didn’t happen lose their records in a fire. 😉
And let’s face it… if the rifles don’t come out and fire a shot in anger, if and when the State lets it be known they’re hunting down all said rifles, well… all the hidden caches and partially-machined AR lowers aren’t going to do anyone much good anyway.
Well, the 80% lower is a start as for staying off the radar, certainly better than the alternative in terms of being harder to find, as well as a very affordable way to do it. better to have it not need it than the alternative . I think Vaughn had a stat that said, something like 700,000 ARs in Ct. and only 200,000 were registered.
Interesting though that finding and deporting 11 million illegal Mexicans would require a “police state” and be impossible but seizing 300 million guns in the hands of some of the most resourceful people in the world might be considered possible.
Perhaps I read too much internet like Anonymous Conservative. But you may not at all be interested in war or aggressive civil unrest, but it might end up being very interested in you. And if you have nothing, and tyranny is attempted to be forced upon you, then you would have to submit. Or if unrest pushes its way to your doorstep, then you stand there flat footed.
The cost of an unmilled polymer is about $60. I watched plenty of videos where some guy finished it with a hand drill, an exacto knife, and a dremel tool. There are parts kits for less than $60. I am just starting to research the upper prices. There are finished assemblies as cheap as $269 from PSA. Sure, not the best and most durable. But I bet I could shoot a face at 100 yards with it. (I learned to shoot in the Marines).
I look to civil disobediecne and then state seccession over the gun issue. Alabama would and so would many other American states.
http://www.armslist.com/
Filter options for state, locality, private/FFL sale, brand, caliber, action, etc.
Yep. Ohio – private sales, no paperwork required, no FOID, no tracking of even in-shop sales (although we can’t get past the background check, but they don’t report what you’re buying). You can even go to the local shop and buy a silence or full auto if you wish.
Lots of things out here in flyover country that the Leftoids are absolutely oblivious to. Which is fine by me.
Confederate flags being flown in upstate New York and all over the north, the level of defiance rising on social media.
Really? Thank you, from the bottom of my heart. There is a God.
and Donny T’s following is growing absolutely massive.
Purchase an M1891-32 Mosin Nagant and a spam can for it, preferably the scoped versions.
91/30 did you mean? My kids both have one of those. Tough as shut to cycle, but solid as a rock. Or club. The bullet going downrange knocks over all the other paper targets with its sonic boom, heh.
Yes.
Keep this in mind, if the fta starts poking around for the lowers there are different rules for obstruction, tampering and destroying evidence on the federal level. Sometimes avoiding the bark is more painful than taking the bite….
How does TRUMP play it?
He’ll play it in some way that drives all the right people to distraction and self-harm. That is his art, and that is his life.
We are lucky to have a berserker on our side — for the most part and only for now, but I’ll take it and enthusiastically. Let him loose to kill, kill, kill. More destruction the better.
We are in the demolition stage of refurbishing the estate, with its rotting beams and listing frame and the rubbish of a hundred years of neglect and disrepair and squatters rights.
Matt
If I believe the Massachusetts Supreme Court, which apparently found the right to gay marriage in their state constitution (approved in 1780), the Pilgrims would be all for it, since they secretly planted gay marriage in their constitution. The same way that the 14th Amendment not only anticipated gay marriage, but illegal anchor babies. Amazing the stuff hidden away in our legal documents! I imagine in a few years they will discover the right to polygamy and incest marriage, which have been hidden away in those documents the whole time!
But as much as I personally sympathize with Kim Davis, having to carry out such an obviously absurd court ruling, it’s still a court ruling. Her situation isn’t like the bakers and photographers who were forced into participating in gay marriage nonsense against their wills; Davis is the county clerk and her job is to issue this marriage certificates. In her situation, the principled thing to do is to resign.
If there is some consolation to this, Davis is probably the only Democrat who has actually been jailed for violating the law during the Obama administration.. Usually they just get a handwave.
I dont understand why all the erstwhile rebels suddenly bend over and say ITS THE LAW. If the law is evil, then it absolutely should be disobeyed by government agents. We are always complaining about government agents enforcing the law, and now suddenly, the fags have corrupted people so much that you actually agree with them?
They are printed between the lines in Lemon Juice.
But as much as I personally sympathize with Kim Davis, having to carry out such an obviously absurd court ruling, it’s still a court ruling.
How quaint of you to imagine we have a functioning republic with a venerated rule of law.
When are you going to start the pushback? When they pass an amendment to outlaw blue eyes?
Once you let one patent absurdity pass as normal — or in this case, as legally respectable in any way — the absurdities accumulate without resistance. A patriot doesn’t begin his revolution when the law recognizes his opposition as legitimate. No law could ever countenance revolution.
So you have neatly set all the predicates for you to accept your own demise. As long as it comes in discrete, reasonable, legal steps. Enjoy splitting hairs between bakers and county clerks, right up until you hear the knock on the door.
Matt
P.S. Stop saying “amazing…!” It’s a faggy leftist tic like “wow just wow.”
Tree of Liberty…
… she be gettin’ a bit thirsty.
These two. Joint CotW nominee.
CH would have been a card in the days of de-segregation.
Naw, all would have ben right with the world.
Reblogged this on The Americana.
4 out of 10. WNB.
A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.
George Orwell re-writes Animal Farm for 2015:
Two cocks good
One cock bad
Gold, Jerry! Gold!
Oh horseshit.
I’m not interested in any way shape or form in creating a precedent that’s gonna get jammed up your ass when the Sharia abiding clerk, the kosher clerk or Nation of Kill Whitey clerk gets elected. This fatass whore who is on marriage #4 just didn’t have the integrity to step away from her $80,000 a year gig she inherited from her mommy. I’m calling it now – – by the time she’s released she’ll have donations rolling in, a book offer and will go on a speaking tour to the snake-handler’s church circuit.
This had dick all to do with her religion.
[CH: diversity + proximity = war.
only now, in the end, do you understand.]
Don’t cut yourself on all that edge, kid.
Remember… nobody ever lost their shirt selling gowns to the brides of Christ. God knows what’s in her heart.
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
A good subject of conversation: what does the Confederate flag mean yo you?
I’m not a Southerner. I’m an Eastern European living in a northish US state. Granted, I’ve traveled all through the South in the early 90s and have been buddies with heritage-conscious Southerners back in my Army days. But strictly speaking, it’s not my flag.
What the Confederate flag means to me is that it’s a symbol of my complete lack of respect for the prevailing, for the time being, liberal order and it’s enforcement arm known as the us government.
It certainly beats that misshapen kerchief that the Nepalese came up with.
That is what it always was for the South.
Blood and soil.
Rebellion.
I’m afraid you don’t get to be a conscientious objector if you can avoid the legal obligation to which you object simply by resigning your job. Wanting to defy the law and continue to hold her office means that it is not about her conscience, but about her ability to impose her views on others.
Also, all these self-described red-pillers who still believe in the imaginary friends in the sky that their parents told them about. Real clear-eyed willingness to face up to the facts of human existence right there. Lulz.
[CH: gaysex is a major disease vector. lulz.]
If there’s no “imaginary friend in the sky” as you assert, then on what grounds do you object to Ms. Davis’ imposition of her views on others?
No moral Lawgiver –> no moral law –> no objective right or wrong –> “morality” determined by force –> we outnumber & will overpower you godless assholes –> we decide “morality” –> siddown & shaddup before you get hurt
Kinda unpleasant, no?
Ever read any pre-Christian philosophy? Greek, Roman? Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Seneca?
If you don’t believe that you can have morality, ethics and normative standards for law without an imaginary sky-god, you lack imagination, education, and the capacity for moral reasoning that most of us were born with.
What the ancients described as “natural law” and the god-botherers attributed to their imaginary friends is now easily recognizable through the tools of evolutionary psychology as the natural selection of traits that enable societies to function and succeed.
Let’s get your foundation established here before we start poking around under the floor of your “morality” (descriptive, prescriptive, proscriptive, or otherwise).
Where exactly are you planting your flag: pre-Christian philosophy, evolutionary psychology, or someplace else?
Evolutionary psychology provides a perfectly sufficient explanation of our innate sense of morality and capacity for moral reasoning without resorting to supernatural explanations.
Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy demonstrate that a comprehensive system of philosophy, morality and law PRECEDED the idea of a god from which such things derived.
Both refute the suggestion that you can’t have morality without a belief in god.
Try to answer the question.
What I’m saying is perfectly clear. If it’s over your head, I can’t help you, mate.
Which worldview is yours, cupcake? I’m not going to refute someone else’s, just to entertain you.
What do you mean by world view?
I made one statement about the history of pre-Christian western philosophy, and I made one statement about evolutionary psychology.
Both are correct.
world·view (wərldˈvyo͞o)
noun
a particular philosophy of life or conception of the world.
I’m an empiricist, obviously.
So your worldview isn’t rooted in pre-Christian philosophy, nor in evolutionary psychology. Have I got that right?
It’s “rooted” in those things the same way as it’s “rooted” in gravity, the first law of thermodynamics and the French Revolution – which is to say, I try to take into account the relevant observable facts.
Now are you going to filibuster all night, or are you going to try to say something interesting?
I’ll refute your godless “morality” if you can muster the mental focus to explain which of the thousands of extant systems is the one to which you subscribe.
As far as I can decipher your addled attempts to make a coherent point, you so far have claimed to be an empiricist, and a believer in pre-Christian philosophy, and a believer in evolutionary psychology.
I believe that pre-Christian philosophy existed. I believe that evolutionary psychology explains the moral instincts and capacities of human beings.
Are you really finding this hard to understand?
(ll. 274-285) But you, Perses, lay up these things within you heart and listen now to right, ceasing altogether to think of violence. For the son of Cronos has ordained this law for men, that fishes and beasts and winged fowls should devour one another, for right is not in them; but to mankind he gave right which proves far the best. For whoever knows the right and is ready to speak it, far-seeing Zeus gives him prosperity; but whoever deliberately lies in his witness and forswears himself, and so hurts Justice and sins beyond repair, that man’s generation is left obscure thereafter. But the generation of the man who swears truly is better thenceforward.
Hesiod, around 700 BC. Clearly the concept of divinely ordained law has a long enough pedigree.
Instincts hardly form an irrefutable foundation for justice.
Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Seneca?
Yes. All of them at least made sacrifices to different imaginary sky Gods and all three were also really closet deists and monotheists. Stoicism is known as the Pagan bridge to Christianity and Plato’s Timaeus was also instrumental as a work in converting the educated wealthy classes to Christianity. Jesus had probably read Plato and Aristotle as well and most of the basic ethics and moralty agree with each other, but they also cover different facets of existence too. The first three are more earthly in their focus.
Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy demonstrate that a comprehensive system of philosophy, morality and law PRECEDED the idea of a god from which such things derived.
Every one of them thought that they were divinely inspired. Ever hear of the Divinity of numbers? Plato saw it as a sea of consciousness that had varying levels of compürehension and access to its secrests but he saw it as swimming in the arms of God and a superior being who created the world. You are presenting revisionist evidence as true.
Hesiod, now THAT was a red pill guy.
It’s “rooted” in those things the same way as it’s “rooted” in gravity, the first law of thermodynamics and the French Revolution
@Mork
Oh, this is rich. The French Revolution? As in, libertardery, equaltardery, brotherhood with all men including groids and the religion of pieces? That French Revolution?
(shakin’ mah haid)
Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy demonstrate that a comprehensive system of philosophy, morality and law PRECEDED the idea of a god from which such things derived.
Yeah… and it’s also interesting that the Greeks and Romans became the core of Christianity, is it not? Of course, that wouldn’t make sense to you. I suppose you’re into atheist-friendly bullshit like Epicureanism and Neoplatonism, amirite?
Good stuff, Heywood.
Thanks. Dumb bastard doesn’t understand that he can’t simultaneously be an empiricist while subscribing to evolutionary psychology and to a hazy mishmash of pre-Christian Greco-Roman philosophy.
D’oh! We collectively forgot to read the pre-Christian pagans. Our bad.
Fill us in, “Mork.” Preferably with plenty of edge.
Shazbot!
Unlike the SJWs of today, the ancients weren’t total ‘tards. Go back to blowing Orson, Mork.
I’m afraid you don’t get to be a conscientious objector if you can avoid the legal obligation to which you object simply by resigning your job. Wanting to defy the law and continue to hold her office means that it is not about her conscience, but about her ability to impose her views on others.
Wha, AGAIN with this “impose views upon others” tripe, as if it’s the curse of the ages?
Where were all you fucks when atheists and queers were imposing THEIR will?
Disingenuous sophomoric ass.
Also, all these self-described red-pillers who still believe in the imaginary friends in the sky that their parents told them about. Real clear-eyed willingness to face up to the facts of human existence right there. Lulz.
Ah, and there’s the n1gger in the woodpile showing his face. Never known it to fail, the amusing irony of those who would first proclaim what does and does not constitute valid conscientious objection, while chompin’ at the bit to throw in the ol’ neener neener about folks with faith, and denigrate the Most High, the Creator of the Universe, as an “imaginary sky friend”.
Avaunt, you half-wise pismire… you’ve only learned enough at community college Philosophy 101 and episodes of South Park to make yourself ridiculous.
Wha, AGAIN with this “impose views upon others” tripe, as if it’s the curse of the ages?
It’s the only card in the relativist’s deck.
Ask them to explain it and you get the neckbeard equivalent (i.e., sixteen paragraphs) of “it’s turtles all the way down.”
Ay, me. Remember when self-styled provocateurs used to provoke? We ask for worthy enemies and solid criticism, and we get … gnats.
“Evolutionary psychology provides a perfectly sufficient explanation of our innate sense of morality and capacity for moral reasoning without resorting to supernatural explanations.”
Evolutionary psychology (science) “explains” how. People seek out religion in the name of “why.” Evolutionary psychology and religious belief are hardly mutually exclusive.
“Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy demonstrate that a comprehensive system of philosophy, morality and law PRECEDED the idea of a god from which such things derived.”
Naturally. But people aren’t robots. Beliefs should be guided by reason. But because we’re human as opposed to programmable machines, they’re is always going to be an emotional layer to them which is sub-rational which religion taps into. This does not imply that religion needs to contradict reason. It should ideally work in tandem with it. People don’t commit acts of bravery and sacrifice (kamikazes or monks setting themselves on fire) because you show them a logical computer program called “this is good,” though. There is a mystical quality that MOTIVATES deep spiritual belief and solidifies conviction (which is again, guided by reason). Religious forms have a way of motivating humans in all sorts of ways. You’re not going to “it’s science, dummy” religion out of existence because the two are mostly addressing different root questions.
“Both refute the suggestion that you can’t have morality without a belief in god.”
Of course you can have morality without god. Neo-Aristotleans certainly believe this and that’s perfectly fine. But perhaps you’re asking all the wrong questions, here. And I say this as someone who is not religious, himself. Religion and a metaphysical belief in a god or gods can be used for all sorts of ends. For much of human history, it has been used to ennoble the human race. In it’s debased form (low church), it can be used to make a mockery of man. (When people like Dawkins attack “religion,” they are attacking low church rather than the beliefs of someone serious like St. Thomas Aquinas.)
Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy demonstrate that a comprehensive system of philosophy, morality and law PRECEDED the idea of a god from which such things derived.”
No, they thought up philosophies of morality at first because they were afraid that if they offended the gods, the gods would exact revenge.
The message is clear: the govt is willing to trample on what people consider right in order to protect the interests of a minority of degenerates.
Exactly. Be a freak and you got a voice. Integrity is old fashioned and lame. Maybe even punishable by law. Freak Train sounding louder, everyone ride the Freak Train…
We can only hope more follow her example.
It seemed unlikely, but I’m starting to wonder if the Obama presidency actually did deal the death blow to America. Helped in the end by John Roberts to finish it off. The death struggle began long before that, of course, but now little seems to remain except empty words.
Flashpoint: White House Confirms Russian Presence In Syria, Warns It Is “Destabilizing
This presence will be increased with Assad growing weaker. The West is seeking to undercut Russian access to the EU natural gas market The West is not really serious about taking out ISIS. A U.S. Armored Brigade Task Force with air support could cut through ISIS like butter and take maybe 200 casualties, in under two weeks. We would send in ten or twelve for that mission.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-03/flashpoint-white-house-confirms-russian-presence-syria-warns-it-destabilizing
Forgot the link
The SU 34 is a studly plane. Check out footage of the Su-27 it’s base design’s performance at air shows.
SU 25 vs A10
which is best?
Don’t know.
Sometime this week the CBC’s As Shit Happens radio program covered the Kim Davis story. They audibly couldn’t wait to. Even on radio you could see the smirking and winking. This was a perfect story. Backwards middle Americans acting all backwards. So, what? Here’s what. This was also when another American, Roosh V, captured the attention of the Mayor of Toronto and the Canadian media. Funny, no mention of Roosh. Imagine.
@gbfm–are you getting your quotes from a book or website? I’d like to read more. Thanks for posting
Need you ask? Theao grzgzgrgrzzeat boioiooklzozllzl for Mzozlmen.
da gbfm invented a time machine
traveled back to 1774
gave all deses quoetsz of wisdomz to the foundning fatherszz
and traveled back to 2015 to score some
punnani with benrkankifed chiccksz
and post da quotes of wisdom heere
lzozolzolzlzolzol
You definitely best commenter of all word of presscraft.
I would argue that the Unitarianism of the Puritans is the foundation for genderlessness and homosexual marriage. Anyone who has lived in Cambridge or the Back Bay and knows member of the Harvard Arts and Science Faculty would understand this in a flash.
I wouldn’t be so quick to rush to defend the likes of Kim Davis (or whatever her name is) if I were you.
Kim Davis is badly behaved slut. She has been married 4 times. She cheated on her first husband with the man who would become her 3rd husband and gave birth to the cuckoo egg child WHILE SHE WAS STILL MARRIED TO HUSBAND 1.
She then married her beta 2nd husband, only to divorce him years later to be with her alpha cad 3rd husband. She was only able to hold onto this guy for 1 year. He left her and she remarried her chump 2nd husband. Why did this guy even take her back????
Who is she to say that she’s better than gay people? The reason why I’m not anti-gay is because straight people these days are so promiscuous, adulterous, and full of evil that they have no business putting constraints on gays.
[CH: i see that you are just like a good leftoid, doing your character assassination opposition research to evade the main issue.
ps i thought all you leftoids were fans of single mommery?
pps gaysex is a major vector of disease and gays are over-represented among the mentally ill and psychologically imbalanced.]
Bulldog Drummond called… he wants his surveillance equipment back.
small world…I went to college in Rowan county..good folks there
[…] Originally posted by da GBFM lzzzzzzzlzlz (TM) as a comment at Chateau Heartiste. […]