Feed on
Posts
Comments

“Go back to Univision”

The Trumpening is quality awesomeness. A breath of political air so fresh it fills the lungs to bursting. I hope it lasts.

If Trump is riding high in the polls and attracting cheerfully wholesome supporters brimming with a genuine emotion they haven’t felt in decades for any GOP cuckservative, maybe, just maybe, it’s because Americans — normal, psychologically healthy Americans at least — prefer a Big Swinging Dick to a Frail Limping Wrist. In the land of the beta male feeb, the alpha male with brass balls is king.

As long as Trump kicks cuck ass and takes ruling class names, CH will post about him. If you don’t like it, go back to Univision.

PS Scott Adams on Jorge Ramos’ (a White Mexican elite) perp walk.

PPS I predict we see another bump up in Trump’s poll numbers following this latest display of effortless alphatude. Trump is like fresh water to a people parched from years roaming a cultural landscape full of supplicating manlets.

198 Responses to ““Go back to Univision””

  1. ar10308 says:

    It’s great to see him keeping campaign promises about deporting feckless Mexicans before he’s even elected.

    • Johnny Lionseed says:

      “See guys? Deportation is easy!”

    • FuriousFerret says:

      Just as Adams put in his article:

      ‘And do you know what his core supporters saw? They saw Trump deport that Mexican reporter right out of the room, metaphorically. Those other candidates are talking about immigration but Trump has already started. Remember we are not talking about anyone’s rational thinking. These sorts of images sneak through your rational defenses.’

      I wonder if a career path for top PUAs as they get older will be political consultants. Sort of how collegiate wrestlers went to MMA as viable career since wrestling had no end game however it was a necessary skill to win a real fight that was represented in MMA.

      The handlers for the political guys are all about ‘boxing’ and no nothing of ‘Jiu Jitsu’ or ‘Wrestling’ so when they when all the Boxer politicians enter the arena expecting to stand up and bang they are getting taken down and submitted by a guy with skill sets they haven’t seen before because they have been discarded.

      Just as in MMA the political guys are going to adapt and they will need coaches. If one was smart they would be looking to hire CH or someone like him to right now when Jiu Jitsu is still be rediscovered. There is a small window of opportunity to take of advantage before everyone starts training it.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Isn’t Dilbert all about the dweeb engineers who get the full-on Nancy Sinatra from the womynz and the cats and the management at NamelessFacelessGloboCorp?

      • Captain Obvious says:

        In m0d, but do you suppose that Scott Adams has been secretly preaching [or at least trying to preach] everything that Mike Judge was warning the dweebs about in Office Space?

      • JohnDSee says:

        Kind of a flawed analogy, as boxing has rules that don’t permit grappling, kicking, etc. But I know where you’re trying to go.

    • Ollie says:

      Somebody said that deportation would cost a “staggering” $200 billion.

      In other words, about HALF the cost of the abysmal F35 program.

      I think we can afford to invest in a defense program that would *actually* keep America safe.

      Ditch the Lightning, deport the Taco, save $200 billion, stop the rape.

    • eyesfrontmen says:

      If I were a Hindu, I would suspect that Trump is Andrew Jackson reborn.

  2. ‘No human being is illegal’ – Ramos

    That line is the height of phaggotry. It’s something that a girl would make up. A really stupid girl.

    • Next a time liberal woman tells me that I will reply with; ” then you agree that no vaginal penetration is illegal…no human is a rapist”

      • FuriousFerret says:

        You’ve actually been told this before in the real world?

        Honestly, I would just laugh in their face if a grown adult should those exact words to me.

    • Philomathean says:

      This guy Ramos is one generous guy.

      There are 7 billion people on the planet. Does he expect all of them to become Americans?

      Question: When is enough immigration for these diversity perverts?

      Answer: When the white majority has its spine severed.

      If The Donald doesn’t get elected only then will we see action to limit the invasion.

      • tacomaster2 says:

        A local radio guy made that point exactly. He said something to the effect of, “without borders and keeping people out, what are we? The western hemisphere land mass?”.

    • Captain Obvious says:

      The weird thing is that ONLY HOMO SAPIENS is even potentially capable of agreeing upon a set of laws and then remaining faithful to the agreed-upon laws. Ergo ONLY HOMO SAPIENS is even potentially capable of committing illegalities. The creatures which are incapable of behaving lawfully [ergo incapable of behaving unlawfully] are the subhumans – the lions and tigers and bears – who live by the “Law” of the jungle [a “law” governing their behavior of which they are completely oblivious]. To say that the illegal alien Mexicans are not “illegal” is to declare that they are SUBHUMAN.

      • FuriousFerret says:

        I think you’re overthinking it a little too much.

        It’s probably more a case that Ramos is just a retard.

      • uh says:

        His conclusion is over-analytical, of course, but the point stands that only humans, who created the law and its categories, can enter this symbolic state of “illegality”.

        This leaves out, as legal considerations always do, the origins of law in animal and specifically primate group dynamics. Anyone who has seen one chimp bow and offer their outstretched hand to another for some infraction will understand that immediately.

        Verbal signals are the cheapest kind: it costs Ramos nothing – actually benefits him – to play loose with symbolic categories by declaring that no human can be illegal. Nothing tangible is affected by the declaration. This is why women are generally in favor of leaving immigrants alone: they are shielded from the real costs to society, and themselves, of immigrants and larger populations.

        People lead very narrow lives, circumscribed by what they think they need and what is available to them. Society is too large, and people all too selfish, for the majority to arrive at higher-order considerations of that sort. And even talking about these matters costs one little apart from time and eyesight, a corollary of one’s ability to affect their course.

        Ramos believes in the duality of legal and illegal, as any complex social organism must, but more to the point: he’s white, has money and property, and a family. Let some Colombians break into his house in Miami, or some crotch-grabber rape his daughter, and watch how fast the kosher embodiment of law swoops in from Aventura to press his case.

      • FuriousFerret says:

        Following Trump’s lead, there is no reason to over analyze completely stupid 5 year old like statements.

        Just swat it down because it’s nonsense and almost anybody that is worth his salt knows it. You don’t need a scholarly analysis of why the statement that ‘No human being is illegal’ is not a valid one.

        This is the problem with academia and current intellectuals. They ask stupid fucking questions that everybody knows the answer to. I’m not talking about questioning current thought in terms of STEM but dumb pseudo philosophical questions that sound like Shia LaBeouf came up with. It’s simply devolved navel gazing.

      • uh says:

        Nothing wrong with some harmless riffing in our “safe place” bra.

      • Elkman says:

        Verbal signals are the cheapest kind: it costs Ramos nothing – actually benefits him – to play loose with symbolic categories by declaring that no human can be illegal. Nothing tangible is affected by the declaration. This is why women are generally in favor of leaving immigrants alone: they are shielded from the real costs to society, and themselves, of immigrants and larger populations.

        Are women sheltered, here in this country, this modern USA with its manlets? Perhaps rather they are not sheltered; which is why they are manjaws.

        People lead very narrow lives, circumscribed by what they think they need and what is available to them. Society is too large, and people all too selfish, for the majority to arrive at higher-order considerations of that sort.

        Yes and then those people who do make higher-order considerations (regarding ethics), realize that under the present circumstances such considerations are a lost cause. For such higher-order considerations to be in effect there has to be some amount of consensus on their value.

    • Anonymous says:

      I see this thing plastered onto bathroom stalls in university campuses.

      Believe it or not, Yurop is even more cucky than Americans in a way.

      “Because of Germany’s historical responsibility, we cannot afford to turn away refugees.”

      Burn in hell.

    • I have had at least 3 different women tell me in person ” no human is illegal ” over the years. And on French speaking forums? dozens.

      The French speaking province of Quebec, where I am, is a sort of feminist haven. ( they physically attacked Roosh a few days ago )

      Many Quebecers are on the far left politically. It is a bit like California, lots of feminists, far left radicals, lots of “save the planet greenies”, lots of vegetarians, ex-hippies etc etc.

      Many are anti-capitalism, anti-petrol, anti-white male etc etc
      They agree with almost anything that is anti-right, anti-conservative.
      The media here is even worse than in the USA, it is even more pro-left and anti-right. It lies even more than the USA media.

      They almost always agree with Cuba, with Illegal immigrants, with China, with Iran, with anyone BUT the USA.

      To many of them – no matter the topic – the USA is always wrong, white males are always wrong. etc etc.

      When they translate a documentary here they often subtly edit the text so that some pro-left /anti-right brainwashing is included. ( I would know, I have seen some of those documentaries first in English then in French and could not believe it is legal to do that. )

      Many oppose anything done to prevent terrorism if it means Muslims will be the focus of such measures.

      Many Quebecers will tell you -foaming at the mouth- that Canada’s Prime Minister ( a conservative) is the real terrorist and that they are far more afraid of him than of any member of ISIS.

      To give you an idea of how bad it is, some Quebecers – not all of course – were happy when the USA was hit on September 11, some Quebec celebrities walked with anti-USA protesters… and so on and so forth…

      On our state sponsored tv station Radio-Canada, while a video of the planes crashing into the twin towers was played in a loop in the background on a giant tv screen, a bunch of journalists were laughing while discussing what was happening to the USA.

      Quebec is a liberal and feminist haven.

      Yes it is pretty much like California – lots of nutjobs – except people speak French and we have snow in winter.

      • uh says:

        Yea, that sounds much worse than California.

        Has to have something to do with how hot your women are. Too much leverage all around, you know? They can declare everyone their enemy because there are no costs to them whatsoever.

      • Anonymous says:

        Yeah, you Quebecois are the worst fucking drivers too

      • PA says:

        I still like the Mes Aieux video for “Degeneration”.

      • corvinus333 says:

        Canadian Friend:

        It’s weird how French Canadians all turned from staunch Catholics into a bunch of commies.

        I blame the sacres they use all the time, which poisoned their souls. English-speaking Catholics typically seem far more reluctant to blaspheme, generally being satisfied with “sh!t” or “fvck”.

      • Paranthropus says:

        How do you account for the now dead Quebec Charter of Values bill? It was widely popular with Quebeckers after it was proposed by the PQ. It was a direct response to Quebec’s discomfort with Muslim incursion into the native Québécois culture. In all of Canada, it was only Quebec that sought to protect its culture against the invasion. I think you might be conflating ‘progressive Montreal’ with ‘all the rest of Quebec’.

      • Obviously Cap'n says:

        The same thing happened in Southern Ireland, when they flipped on a dime and went from being the most “conservative” nation in Europe to voting [of their own free will] to endorse Sodomite “Marriage”. That’s one of the great underlying problems with Rome and its Legalism and its “Argument by Appeal to Authority” – once someone Evil gains control of the megaphone, the legalist peasants will dutifully fall in line with whichever new legalism-du-jour is emanating from the megaphone.

      • Starets says:

        @PA

        I just watched that Mes Aieux video, I’d never seen it before.

        It is a good video. It has an interesting way of presenting the ‘Blood and Soil’ idea. Of course, the French-Canadians have always been more comfortable with that line of thinking, they have been under the threat of demographic extinction for much longer than anglos in North America. Note their use of the phrase ‘Pur Laine’ (pure wool) to refer to proper French-Canadians.

      • PA says:

        Yeah, that was the b/w video, with English subtitles. I was surprised by CF’s description of pozzed up French Canadians.

        Live performance videos of that unambiguously pro-life, pro-White fertility song (in come cases featuring a cameo appearance by Celine Dion) are met with thunderous cheers from the audiences.

      • corvinus333 says:

        The same thing happened in Southern Ireland, when they flipped on a dime and went from being the most “conservative” nation in Europe to voting [of their own free will] to endorse Sodomite “Marriage”. That’s one of the great underlying problems with Rome and its Legalism and its “Argument by Appeal to Authority” – once someone Evil gains control of the megaphone, the legalist peasants will dutifully fall in line with whichever new legalism-du-jour is emanating from the megaphone.

        First of all, only about 40% of the Irish can actually be considered at all Catholic any more. The other 60% would have happily supported fag marriage in any case.

        Secondly, you can thank anti-Catholics gaining control of the Church at the top and calling Vatican II for its turning into the Megachurch of Socialism.

      • I think you might be conflating ‘progressive Montreal’ with ‘all the rest of Quebec’.

        Just as in the USA the further away people live from large cities, the less liberal they are and the more pro-white they are.

        I should have been more clear, this is mostly something found in large ( large to us, but small compared to US ) cities, mostly in Montreal but also in other “large” cities in Quebec.

        Other large cities in Canada ( Toronto for example ) are also festering with extreme left liberals and feminazis who welcome with open arms the race replacement program that every white nation on earth is going trough these days.

        It is true a large portion of French Quebecers are fierce defenders of their culture, mostly of the French language, many even wish Quebec would separate from Canada, but they are still very much on the left politically ( as I described in the previous comment ) and very tolerant of multiculturalism which is a strange contradiction that they do not seem to get.

        Their problem with Islam is not related to saving the white race, it is because Quebec used to be ruled with an iron hand by the Catholic church. Everything and I mean EVERYthing was considered a sin, even washing your private parts for more than a couple seconds was considered suspicious about 60 years ago .

        It took decades to dismantle this, to “escape” from this, and French Quebecers are “allergic” to anyone who is very religious.

        They are not worried or barely worried at all that Muslims have brown skin and are replacing us, they are worried about Muslim’s strict religious rules.

        Quebec is now a very permissive culture, we have swingers clubs and in stripper bars you can get a hand job, Quebecers do not want Muslims ( or Jews for that matter ) to make everything a sin again.

        Very few French Quebecers are even aware the white race is being replaced all over the world.

        French Quebecers tend to be very centered on their own little world. Most of them know very little about the rest of Canada or about the USA, well they “know” what the liberal media tells them which are mostly lies.

        In short, The average Quebecer sounds more like the Spirit Within than like me.

    • balsac says:

      “Calling them illegal aliens is wrong because no human being is illegal”, the right answer: “You’re right. Illegal applies to things and actions. Those who break laws are criminals, not illegals. So the proper term is criminal aliens. Thanks for making sure we use proper terms.”

  3. […] “Go back to Univision” […]

  4. At last someone put that Miami based right wing fascist presstitute in his place! Looking forward to watching how Trump is going to take on Hillary. Hillary is next, right?
    Just a little note: Jorge Ramos is not popular in Mexico, he’s the darling Cuban Americans in Miami.

  5. Glengarry says:

    Compare and contrast with Bernie Sanders.

    • Anonymous says:

      Yeah, CH needs to do a post on this mud loving manlet, he has a following of the worst kind of libtards, he is their new Ron Paul

  6. […] “Go back to Univision” […]

  7. khorne says:

    That was beautiful. Lord Khorne lets fall a molten iron tear from atop his throne of skulls.

  8. Trump needs to think long and hard about his running mate. Cruz – born in Canada [not natural-born], too cuckservative, and his wife worked for Rhymes-With-Tucker-Max. Carson – too effeminate, voice too high-pitched, came out in favor of MANDATORY VACCINES via the Vaccine Industrial Complex [total deal-breaker for a surgeon who ought to know better]. My suggestion:

    • Danger says:

      How about sherrif Joe from Arizona? He would be another great man who stands against left-wing tyranny.

      • Anonymous says:

        Ann Coulter

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Ann Coulter for VP… if it’s good enough for Sharknado (III), it’s good enough for Trump!

        Oh, Hell Yes!

      • God help me, but I agree it should be Ann Coulter. If she could work in some lines from the movie now and then (hopefully while deporting foreigners), I think I’d spend the next eight years squinting through tears of joy.

        This isn’t how I’d run a real country, of course; but this has never been a real country, and now it’s time for the charade to end. I’d rather watch the place fall apart while a nuciferous cad and the madame VP from Sharknado 3 throw Mexicans overboard by the shovelful.

    • khorne says:

      Cruz is no cuckservative. Are you kidding me?

      And it doesn’t matter where he was born. His parents are American citizens.

      Trump – Cruz 2016

      • Captain Obvious says:

        No, actually his father was a refugee from Cuba – a “man without portfolio” – Cruz isn’t even naturally born into CANADA.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        And Cruz goes around claiming to be this Princeton/Harvard-edumakated Constitutional Scholar. Frigging hypocrite. He knows d@mned well that he’s not a “Naturally Born” citizen. Plus his wife worked for Rhymes-With-Tucker-Max. Cruz is Bernie Sanders in sheep’s clothing. And he’s a whiner. Cruz will generate ZERO Gina Tinglezzzlololzzz.

      • khorne says:

        Cruz’s mother was a citizen when he was born. That makes Cruz a natural born citizen. End of discussion

      • Captain Obvious says:

        BULLSH!T. It was precisely wolves in sheep’s clothing, like Obama and Cruz, whom the Founders had in mind when they inserted the “Naturally Born” modifier into the Constitution. In no way shape manner or form is Cruz a naturally born citizen.

      • khorne says:

        So if Cruz had to be born on US soil to be a naturally born citizen, then what does that say about anchor babies? Are they natural born citizens?

        The relevant metric is whether one is born to American parents. Location is irrelevant.

      • James Blonde says:

        Don’t try to confuse Captain Thorazine with facts. Next he’ll be telling us that Cruz is actually an Eskimo.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Cruz was NOT born to American parents. His father was a REFUGEE FROM CUBA living in CANADA.

      • Bobby Cuddlefuck aka The Hamster Whisperer says:

        Cruz is the epitome of cuckservative. Goldman Sachs funding. If you like Ted Cruz, you most likely like to be anally penetrated.

      • James Blonde says:

        And his mother is a natural-born American citizen. Or are you seriously trying to claim that someone born to (at least one) American citizen overseas is not eligible? Never mind, rhetorical question.

      • Marc Bahn says:

        Cruz is as transparently fake as they come. He does have better advisors than the others do, which is why he’s keeping his mouth shut.

      • Captain Obvious says:

        OMG, t*h*w*a*c*k, your Mom was born in Tel Aviv? Or was your Dad born in Lagos and your Mom born in Scarsdale?

      • James Blonde says:

        “no answer from Captain Thorazine” = “damn, the n*gger is right!”

      • corvinus333 says:

        Cruz is no cuckservative. Are you kidding me?

        Cruz has repeatedly said he wanted to increase legal immigration as well as H-1B visas. And when the Senate passed an amnesty last year, he attempted to do just that. So yes, he is a cuckservative.

      • khorne says:

        Well that at least, Corvinus, is a substantive claim.

        But Cruz’s reputation for defying the leftist establishment and the phony cuck rightist establishment speaks for itself. He called Bitch McConnell a liar on the Senate floor. That took courage.

        He has a 96% Liberty Score from conservativereview.com, so his voting record is rock solid. He has a pre-Senate history of fighting and winning as the Texas attorney general. Leftists like Alan Dershowitz acknowledge his sharp intelligence and skill.

      • “Cruz is no cuckservative.”

        First, in the broad sense, anyone in favour of Enlightenment mores and ideals is a Cuckservative. You won’t get away from shiny happy human rights mumbo-jumbo so long as people take that seriously.

        Second, Cruz was booed offstage at an “In Defense of Christians Dinner” because he was equated the persecution of Christians in the Middle East to the persecution of Jews, also saying that those who hate Israel hate America, and those who hate Christians hate Jews. Many Middle-Eastern Christians, who, apart objecting to the obvious bs of such a statement, also observe Israeli behavior firsthand, complained rowdily. Cruz simply said: “If you will not stand with Israel and the Jews, I will not stand with you,” and walked offstage.

        That’s the definition of Cuckservative.

      • Difference Maker says:

        Then what was the deal with Obama, scarcely a few years ago? His mother was a citizen.

        Obviously, it has always been the case that the President must be born in the country

      • khorne says:

        So that makes George Washington and Thomas Jefferson cuckservatives. What the hell is a conservative then, by your definition

      • khorne says:

        I have no respect for this idiotic anti-Semitism on the right. Certain losers are scared of a race that has shown enourmous success and talent for thousands of years despite terrible persecution.

        We whites are proud of our own civilizational success. We don’t need petty animosity toward the Jews and their civilizational success.

        And Christians, who believe that a certain Jewish carpenter is God incarnate, should have nothing but good will toward the Jewish people.

    • He’s from Blue/Purple Wisconsin, and it’s a total dis to Scott Cuckservative Walker [whom Trump obviously despises]. Clarke speaks in a deep voice, using simple straightforward honest declarative sentences. He’s natural-born. He’s no-nonsense. He’s Law-N-Order. He has A++ telegenic-ness, just like The Donald. Imagine the press conference up in Madison, WI, to announce The Donald’s running mate, only it’s NOT the Cuckservative Governor. Instead it’s the Conservative Sheriff. The crowd goes NUTS!!!

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Imagine the Donald saying, “I will be personally responsible for building The Wall, and Vice President Clarke will be personally responsible for rounding them all up and sending them back to their God-given homeland of Mexico. We’ll have the entire project finished ahead of schedule and under budget.”

      • trapezius says:

        Good call. I had never heard of this guy but I agree he’s impressive. He speaks more coherently and convincingly than just about any off the candidates.

      • trapezius says:

        Don’t know why my ‘f’ keeps doubling.

      • khorne says:

        I could get used to Vice President Clarke

      • I was cooped up in the woods watching cable when the Bantumore riots happened, and this guy was all over Fox News. I have to agree, if there’s one black man in America today who commands some respect from me, it’s this guy.

        Mencius Moldbug, in one of his more helpful formulations, argues the difference between a Whig and a Tory is that a true Tory believes rioters should be shot. And, while I can’t quote Clarke chapter and verse, he seems to edge very close– if it’s totally up to him, maybe past– the line that makes him a true Tory.

        Cruz is not a good pick– the image of him sitting beside Kristol, the both of them twinkle-eyed, and talking about “the threat from Putin”, etc., revulses me. I don’t understand the enthusiasm for Cruz in some quarters at all. He’s dyed-in-the-wool NeoCon, he has a whiny voice. What is he, the Magic Latrino?

        Anyway, I appreciate Captain Obvious highlighting Clarke, who appears to be a genuinely Righteous Negro. If Trump needs to build a Cabinet of Truth-Talkers, maybe there’s a place for Clarke at the table. That said, I should hope Trump can find a white apprentice for the vital role of his next-in-line.

    • Captain Obvious says:

      And the frigging Eskimos will be squirting diarrhea into their pants – a Fascist Scots-German running with a Fascist Kneegrow? All the Eskimos will die of hyperventilation before we even get to Erection Day 2016.

    • Faber says:

      Your factors in evaluating a running mate are retarded. Opposing vaccines aint a winning platform

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Opposing MANDATORY vaccination by the Vaccine Industrial Complex. Total Winner. 100% approval in SWPLville Whiteopia [think Christian Scientists and anti-GMA activists] and also with Bible Thumping Home Schoolers and also with 7th Day Adventist Nogs & Mystery Meats. Win. Win. Win.

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Let the “good” negros proceed to clean up their own areas and prove their worth to white society.

      Putting one on the ticket is just the same ol’ same fool’s errand that says we and The Others can live together under one roof and have a sane society.

      There aren’t enough of ’em, and cherry-picking the good ones to put your arm around is nothing but a continued Trojan Horse.

      • PA says:

        Agreed. Even Romney had the sense to stay clear of any diversity picks for his ticket.

        Ann Coulter. The powers that be ought to fear the VP as much of not more than the pres, for security reasons.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Like Lucius said above, there is “a place at the table” for men like Clarke… a stalwart underboss in charge of his own, in a de facto if not de iure segregated society… in the vein of Booker T. Washington maxim about the fingers of the hand.

      • Obviously Cap'n says:

        > “Let the “good” negros proceed to clean up their own areas” ——— But Vice President Clarke would be tasked with cleaning up the BARRIOS and sending all the illegals back to their God-given homeland of Mexico. The Eskimo Psychiatrists’ circuits would overload and fry, trying to explain to Quaneesha and Latravius why it was wrong for VP Clarke to send back “All Dem Mexikunz What Be Taking Black People Jobs”. Trump/Clark would win an absolute majority of the Black Vote.

      • Obviously Cap'n says:

        Plus Clarke gives you the electoral votes of Wisconsin, and Michigan, probably Minnesota, and makes Illinois VERY COMPETITIVE [Blacks in Illinois HATE RAHM EMANUEL!!!].

      • PA says:

        — “The Eskimo Psychiatrists’ circuits would overload and fry, trying to explain to Quaneesha and Latravius why it was wrong for VP Clarke”

        They had no such problems ‘high tech lynching’ Clarence Thomas.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Trump/Clark would win an absolute majority of the Black Vote.

        Doubtful…

        … and if YT is at the point where he needs to ally himself with negros in order to get his country back, well… it’s already too late…

        … which, as those with eyes to see already know, it is.

    • corvinus333 says:

      Captain, let’s not propose groids just because they have a good voice. That’s how groids are: they have nice-sounding voices but no brains.

      Just like Prezidunt Butt-Nekkid.

    • Jason773 says:

      I would actually cream my pants to a Trump/Carson Republican ticket. I agree that Carson is no president, but I think he would make an excellent VP tackling issues such as healthcare and education.

      Trump as the take charge alpha president and Carson as the intelligent, moderately tempered VP who can speak candidly about healthcare, education and race. I’m giddy thinking about it. This scenario checks so many boxes that I think the two of them together would be amazing for this country.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Yeah, just what this country needs… a bombastic loose cannon white guy “tempered” with Morgan Freeman.

        This is a question of nation, not some fucking Hollywood script..

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      • corvinus333 says:

        Again… groids sound intelligent, but have absolutely nothing upstairs. How many times do we have to explain that real life isn’t Hollywood?

  9. Danger says:

    Exactly what a President should be. Decisive, in charge, and no apologies.

    Engage on your terms and only your terms. This is how you win with women and life. Embrace it and enjoy it, but most important of all, do not back down.

  10. wqevqw says:

    Context video, also full with alphaness:

  11. Philomathean says:

    I love how that idiot starts babbling about “rights”.

  12. Xavier R says:

    Go back to haim saban’s cabana rent boy beeatch.

    For VP, American patriot and brain of immigration defense Jeff Sessions would be my #1, but unfortunately too old and lacks the swing vote leverage an OH, VA, NC, WI or FL candidate could offer.

    I haven’t followed him closely enough, but could least treasonous dem, Jim Webb (VA) be viable ? Ex military, Reagan admin, alpha, swing state sway, alpha smack down of W Bush in private, and he wrote a darn good book on Scots Irish

    [CH: i was warming up to webb until a recent showdown with black lives matter hecklers where he basically caved to the howling mob.
    kinda hard to re-earn my respect after that poor showing.]

    • Anonymous says:

      His book also is constantly reiterating what he claims is the assimilating nature of Celts. He goes as far to say that he considers two of his military buddies (one Asian, one Latin, I believe) to be Scots-Irish based on a handful of cultural values they’ve adopted. A little too pandering to the Koombaya crowd, if you ask me.

  13. Ripp says:

    “Go back to univison”

    Subtext: go back to mexico.

    Trump 2016

    • lcs says:

      Actually Donald enacted his immigration plan in front of a live audience. He identified an undesirable foreigner, kicked him out and then brought him back in, after deciding he was ‘ok’. I mean this guy’s mind is many steps ahead of you all the time.

  14. I just love it. Calm, cool, collected. There is just no way he was going to ruin his speech for a heckler. “You weren’t called sir. Sit down!” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AetJWKjVqOI

  15. newlyaloof says:

    @Heartiste, that phrase needs to go viral …

    Trump immediately noticed media “gotcha outragism” and destroys it.

  16. anonymous says:

    In the recent Obergefell “same sex marriage” (states’/legislative branch rights) case, Justice Scalia wrote:

    I write separately to call attention to this Court’s threat to American democracy.

    The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me. The law can recognize as marriage whatever sexual attachments and living arrangements it wishes, and can accord them favorable civil consequences, from tax treatment to rights of inheritance. Those civil consequences—and the public approval that conferring the name of marriage evidences—can perhaps have adverse social effects, but no more adverse than the effects of many other controversial laws.

    So it is not of special importance to me what the law says about marriage. It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me.

    Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court.

    The opinion in these cases is the furthest extension in fact—and the furthest extension one can even imagine—of the Court’s claimed power to create “liberties” that the Constitution and its Amendments neglect to mention. This practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom to govern themselves.

    Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 2626-27 (2015).

    Scalia also warned the communists who now control the United States government, law, media, multinational corporations, and even the printing of money (which they give to themselves interest free):

    But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in today’s judicial Putsch. . . . Hubris is sometimes defined as o’erweening pride; and pride, we know, goeth before a fall. The Judiciary is the “least dangerous” of the federal branches because it has “neither Force nor Will, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm” and the States, “even for the efficacy of its judgments.” With each decision of ours that takes from the People a question properly left to them—with each decision that is unabashedly based not on law, but on the “reasoned judgment” of a bare majority of this Court—we move one step closer to being reminded of our impotence.

    Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 2629-31 (2015).

  17. CaveClown says:

    Finally someone that understands that if you want to be president, ACT LIKE YOU ALREADY ARE.

  18. Mr. Mitchell says:

    1. Why the image of the little white girl for nearly every Trump post?…

    2. Trump, while in a haste to “deport” that Latino reporter, simultaneously deported freedom of the press… Police state at its most blatant…behold the future…

    The Constitution loses meaning and power when those in charge refuse to observe it and honor it. It is at times of conflict and confusion and raw emotion that observance of and obedience to the Constitution is most requisite… What good is the Constitution if it doesn’t work?

    • ho says:

      “2. Trump, while in a haste to “deport” that Latino reporter, simultaneously deported freedom of the press… Police state at its most blatant…behold the future…”

      Are you trolling, or just mentally retarded?

    • shartiste says:

      “1. Why the image of the little white girl for nearly every Trump post?”

      Does that threaten you, Mr. Goldstein… er I mean Mr. Mitchell? Nice nom de goy.

    • becausenonsc says:

      The reporter was rude (and unfair) to those reporters that actually waited for their turn.

      When he later behaved, he got his question in. That is fairness without animosity.

      • trapezius says:

        Actually Trump was much too indulgent with Ramos after he let him back in, allowing him to engage in an unruly back-and-forth for several minutes.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I agree, he was too indulgent. It should have been,

        “Catch me on the rebound… but for today, you’ve lost your press privileges.”

    • Corvo says:

      There is no constitutional right to stand up and butt in with a question when you haven’t been called on. Wait your turn like everyone else. Hispanics get no special rights to talk above everyone else – just like they have no special rights to butt in line and immigrate in front of everyone else in the world following the rules and waiting in line.

      Go back to cuckland, Mitchell.

    • FuriousFerret says:

      Troll.

      C’mon your points are nonsensical and/or dumb.

      1) Are you that stupid that you can’t figure this one out?

      2) The dude interrupted and was thrown out like a heckler would be at a performance because he was ruining for the everybody else. When he behaved by proper etiquette he was allowed back in and allowed to ask questions.

      You are simply using emotion based hyperbole without sophistication which to this crowd is the ultimate sin. I vote for this person to banned from the Chateau, not because he’s a libtard but because he has no tact, no skill, no persuasion and uses the logic of a five year old.

      We already have one Strapon Within. No reason to clog up the boards with Strapon Junior.

      • Mr. Mitchell says:

        1. I have my suspicions for why the pic is posted, but I’d rather hear it from the horse’s mouth.

        2. After Trump made the comment about illegals being rapists and criminals, Univision dumped his pageant. The line in the sand had been drawn (I think Trump filed a lawsuit, that’s currently onging, against Univision for breaking contract. Btw, when Trump was making money with Univision, he was perfectly happy to buddy up with them…now that the cash flow from Univision is gone, behold Trump’s hostility). It was not likely that Trump was going to allow Ramos any time to speak as a form of retaliation against Univision, so Ramos, likely an alpha himself in his own right, took it upon himself to have his voice heard. Trump only allowed him back into the room to merely save face (purely political).

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Guys, pay attention…

      This Mitchell character has appeared on other threads with his/her jive ass trolling…

      Don’t know if he/she is a darky or a Chosen-not-Frozen, but don’t give him/her the satisfaction of anything but drive-by disdain and mockery… especially for such vapid inanity as this freedom of the press OMG CONSTITUTION bullshit.

      As if these Eskimo/n1gger shills ever say one “But, Constitution!” peep about the MSM being in iron-hand control of their kinsmen.

      (((shakin’ it)))

    • 2. Trump, while in a haste to “deport” that Latino reporter, simultaneously deported freedom of the press… Police state at its most blatant…behold the future…

      Ramos did not respect the rules, it was not his turn to speak.

      And while Ramos is talking when it is not his turn, it is the freedom of press of the other journalists in the room that is suppressed. Did you think of that??

      You are free to drive your car whenever you want but not run red lights, same difference, Ramos was free to talk but not when it was not his turn.

      Police state?

      You’re an idiot.

      • mendozatorres says:

        “And while Ramos is talking when it is not his turn, it is the freedom of press of the other journalists in the room that is suppressed. Did you think of that??”

        Few other thought of this when it it TOO obvious.

    • CaveClown says:

      The little girl represents the same look you give your power top boyfriend.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        That little girl represents what and who we are fighting for…

        … that’s why it gives the Eskimo and n166er trolls a case of the heebie-jeebies.

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Are you jealous?

      • Marc Bahn says:

        Little White Girl picture = “Yes, there’s still beauty in the world” as editorial on the story.

    • Dman says:

      lol, look what happened to “don’t tase me bro” guy, this is nothing

      the guy wasn’t even asking questions, simply making statements

    • There is no “freedom of the press” that means “anybody claiming to be press can stand up and loudly interrupt others at a press conference.”

      “Freedom of the press” means the government can’t come in and burn your press to the ground for saying the president is a loon. It doesn’t mean anybody owes you obsequious silence while you engage in a “journalistic” monologue.

    • anonymous says:

      get out, jew.

      now is not the time. you’ve been waging war on us for 100 years and winning for 65 years, and we have finally woken up.

      fuck you.

  19. ho says:

    Fullchan.

  20. Violator Invictus says:

    I love it. Hopefully a healthy dose of foreshadowing pointing ahead to President Trump “escorting” tens of millions of invading mestizos back to their 3rd world shit holes.

  21. Days of Broken Arrows says:

    Anyone remember that Al Pacino movie where he played a lawyer and shouted things like “You’re ALL out of order!!” This is the appeal Trump has.

    Everyone wants to be able to shout things at the judge. Everyone wants to be able to put the reporter(s) in their place because they’re really activists.

    The way that Trump’s doing this is letting people live vicariously through his actions. It’s how we feel when we identify with a fighter-type character in a movie. Very effective.

    It’s also a shrewd way for Trump to get people to identify with him, even though he’s of a different class than most anyone who will potentially vote for him.

    And on top of that it’s also fun to watch him really rile up his opponents because he’s almost like a great fighter. What he’s doing is psyching people out with trash talk so by the time they enter the ring they’re already beaten.

    His methods are working on so many different levels it’s actually hard to analyze.

  22. Wrong Side of History says:

    I don’t think Trump has failed a shit test in his life. This man is truly a natural.

  23. Winter says:

    I wonder what Trump will do in his first 100 days. Maybe put the military on the border until the wall construction is well under way.

    Thing is the tribe are smart and resourceful. Trump is delivering us from the nightmare they’ve been making for us. How long before their response and what will it be? It might be just the usual screaming racist stuff but if they figure that won’t work they’ll try something else. Maybe some false pedo accusations? Maybe a heart attack? I don’t think an overt assasination by a lone nut because they know it might trigger a war they’re not ready to have yet.

    • shartiste says:

      it is a shame that Trump isn’t ostensibly wise to the JQ. A guy that interconnected in elite society and in touch with the alt-right has to understand the eskimo concerns, but there’s no sign at all that he agrees with it. It would be deflating if he wins all the shit test battles and then loses the most important one.

    • uh says:

      Um, Trump is totally kosher. The Jews aren’t behind the cuckservative pushback. It’s almost purely a mangina/gynocracy affair.

    • zagzygg says:

      Don’t overestimate their intelligence. They had 2000+ years to develop a strategy of ethnic unity and subversion. We’ve had since the advent of the web 20 years ago. I think we’re catching up quickly.

    • NothingMan00 says:

      Caught the first volley of what they’re cooking up yesterday. Facebook was practically spamming me with a news story about David Duke’s “he’s the best of the bunch” remark re: Donald Trump. I clicked on the link and saw maybe 30 different headlines that took this bit and made it in to things like “KKK OFFICIALLY ENDORSING THE DONALD” , “JUST AS WE SUSPECTED: BIGOTS WORSHIP TRUMP” , “GET READY FOR LYNCHINGS: TRUMP IS A KLANSMAN.” Just bizarre stuff that went far beyond distortion to pure fabrication, but it was coming from relatively prominent online news sources. I knew this was going to happen. They were inevitably going to use the admiration Trump gets from the “wrong” kind of people as a strike against him. I just wasn’t expecting it to start until a few months from now.

    • anonymous says:

      no, he cannot. there are still 41 million Africans here. Africans are the main problem on Earth.

      what do we do about it?

  24. Lew says:

    Trump does not stop attacking. He chooses his words for maximum effect. Trump could have said “leave the room; wait your turn. Univision is not the only media outlet here,” or something to that effect. Instead, he basically said go back to Mexico and (by implication) take your supporters with you..

  25. Mudsharker gets slotted live on airhttp://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/08/26/3695487/tv-journalist-shooter-id/

  26. Lash says:

    Smartly said, as usual.

    I find whenever I hear Mr Trump speak on radio or TV, I laugh.

    The kind of laugh, now that I think of it, that expresses relief.

    This is too good to be true. No matter what does or does not happen on this amazing road trip, Trump has forced into polite conversation the matters of anchor babies, sanctuary cities, a wall.

    If the way that perp walk (haha) went down with Ramos is any preview, then the future should be an exciting place to live.

  27. Experienced Father says:

    Carlos Slim and his henchmen are certainly taking Trump’s immigration stand personally.

    The more the ‘Slimette’s’ do this, the more street cred “Teflon Don” Trump is going to have with the Republican primary voting public.

  28. ChuckSteak says:

    I think Jesse Ventura (who said he’d be his running mate) would actually be a choice to run with Trump.

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Running mate or chief of security?

      Too much T on the ticket probably isn’t a good idea… no need to paint the peacock in the eyes of the average ‘Murrican.

      I’m starting to like the idea of Ann Coulter… when it comes to the press and other smarmy stooges, she can handle the Don’s light work.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        And it will give the vimmens excuse to throw their support that way without having to overtly admit any red pill tingles.

      • ChuckSteak says:

        I was just thinking in terms of the people that think of Trump as being for the rich, by the rich (even though that’s not true) due to his wealth who are not buying into his populism. Ventura has an economic populism that would possibly appeal to more economically left wing people (at least old union-type Democrats as opposed to the faggotty types that make up the party, today) and he’s not a total moron on social issues (even though he’s mostly hands off, kind of like Trump is, actually). People often forget that there are many socially conservative people that vote Democrat because they think “well, the social issues won’t change–the world’s going to hell– but at least the Democrats seem to care a little bit about my pocketbook.” The way economic issues are conflated social issues within American politics is a bit baffling at times. I’m (philosophically) pro-life so therefore I must be anti-union? That’s according to logic of pop culture politics. I mean, wtf?!

        Anyways, Ventura is probably not the best choice, I agree. But I’d still consider it. And I do agree that too much “T” on a ticket could possibly be a bad thing. I’m beginning to like Ann Coulter. I wonder what took her so long to stop being a shill for neo-cons?

      • Greg Eliot says:

        She pretty much had to appear to be a neocon shill because that was the only game in town for an intelligent antiLeftist who didn’t want to dip a toe too deeply into what would lead one into RAY-CISS and/or “won’t work in this town again” waters.

    • shartiste says:

      Ventura is wacky, I don’t think he brings anything to the table as a running mate. He’s basically been a professional conspiracy theorist for the past 10 years. I like a good conspiracy theory myself, but Ventura is just Alex Jones with a deeper voice.

    • Wrong Side of History says:

      I’d like for Trump to have a wimpy VP that acts as controlled opposition. Trump can publicly slap him down occasionally to reinforce his alpha image with the public.

    • PA says:

      Clinton/Gore was a double-T ticket so we know it can work. Still, only one of the two came across as a larger than life alpha. The other was a deferential introvert.

      It’s a better dynamic and presentation to balance a charismatic lead with an older, serious figure, like Reagan/Bush or Kennedy/Johnson.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        By “too much T” I didn’t mean merely another male.

      • PA says:

        Clinton and Gore were billed as the “hunk ticket” because they were young and young female voters liked them.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Heh, heh… Gore’s smooch on his wife went a long way in the public’s eye… until he reverted to type and started spewing those “inconvenient truths”.

      • PA says:

        That smooch was eight years later. He unraveled or rather, reverted to his creepozoid self after losing to Bush. But in 1992 the Clinton Gore ticket was an MTV wet dream.

      • PA says:

        One of my male professors in college was gushing about how Clinton is the Huck Finn to Gore’s Tom Sawyer.

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I’m aware that everyone was gushing over Clinton/Gore… two young guys, neo-Camelot, all that.

        But Gore was no “badass” T-type like Ventura… and Clinton wasn’t Trump either, for that matter… he was considered very safe.

      • Lash says:

        “But in 1992 the Clinton Gore ticket was an MTV wet dream.”

        Mm hm. GenXers round these here parts will recll.

  29. Mel Gibson says:

    The Race War went live on TV this morning. Then the black murder posted to his social media a first-person video of his executions of whites.

    • shartiste says:

      1) he dindu nuffin

      2) if he diddu sumfin, it is somehow a white person’s fault

      you’re welcome, I just saved you from trying to sift through #blacktwitter

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Apparently an alleged “racist remark” still justifies murder amongst these “gentle giants”.

      Never known it to fail… the first word out of a negro’s mouth, when confronted by the authorities and taken to task for lack of impulse control, is: “He called me a n1gger!”

    • Experienced Father says:

      >>Then the black murder posted to his social media a first-person
      >>video of his executions of whites.

      CNN is trying its best to avoid reporting that.

    • White people will not riot and not loot for days and not set that city on fire and will not beat up random black people.

      White leaders and white celebrities will not say white people are right to be angry.

      Yet in the end the media and the left ( but I repeat myself ) will make us – white people – the villains for the billionth time this week.

  30. PA says:

    Trump understands that this isn’t about “speaking out of turn” decorum. It was about establishing who owns the room.

    If we had a country country of our own, we’d be giving a representative of the press lots of sympathy and leeway when confronting an aspiring government figure. But this isn’t about freedom of the press either because this country is not ours.

    In the given circumstances, that confrontation was about national destiny. Does the country being to us or to an arrogant anti -White errand boy of global oligarchy.

    • mendozatorres says:

      Hadn’t thought of it that way but it certainly rings true.

    • Diversity Is Good says:

      Trump understands that this isn’t about “speaking out of turn” decorum. It was about establishing who owns the room.

      This. And line-jumpers don’t get jack from Trump, clearly.

      If we had a country country of our own, we’d be giving a representative of the press lots of sympathy and leeway when confronting an aspiring government figure.

      Fuck, no! If we had a country of our own, we’d treat Mexican journalists asking questions of American leaders in America exactly the same way that Mexican leaders would treat American journalists asking them questions in Mexico.

      That would be, “cayete, pendejo!”. If the journalist didn’t take the hint and kept on with questions, then it would be “Vamos, puto!” followed by a beat down in the alley and a 24 hour stay in jail for breaking any of several laws. Followed by a non-apology and a promise to look into the case Real Soon Now.

      There’s no way any US reporter could ever talk to a Mexican candidate the way Univision pimps for La Raza talk to US candidates.

      But this isn’t about freedom of the press either because this country is not ours.

      This is all about globalist cuckservatism and a rebellion against it.

    • Experienced Father says:

      PA,

      Trump understands, see this —

      “Jorge Ramos Discloses Daughter Works for Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign”

  31. greyghost says:

    Trump is having an effect outside of politics. ESPN has a couple of men speaking like men they had to discipline. Carter shocked men and I now have a strange respect for the guy. And Schilling just broke ranks and called a spade a spade. ESPN before long will need a new casting call for sissies and manginas if this keeps up.

  32. zagzygg says:

    Anyone have some photoshop skills to put Donald’s face on the movie poster of “Conan the Barbarian” (Arnold Schwarzenegger) movie from the early 80’s? The one where he is brandishing the sword over his head, and the hot blond chick is kneeling at his feet?

  33. Hugh Jenniks says:

    Trump has been great on the criminality of the invaders. He should also mention all the hideous diseases they bring in.

  34. Stationarity says:

    Ramos in a perp walk? More like a derp walk.

  35. Lex Corvus says:

    Interestingly, Scott Adams appears to be a classic beta, or at least he was when he got married in 2006. To be fair, his bride was 12 years his junior (37 to his 49), but she was (a) not pretty, (b) divorced, and (c) had two sprogs from her previous marriage. The kicker: “‘I will be ranked seventh [after my wife, her two kids, and our three cats] in line of importance,’ Adams tells PEOPLE.” That’s some heavy beta stink right there. Can you imagine Trump uttering such a line?

    Perhaps his fascination for Trump is a fascination for what Adams—a rich and internationally famous cartoonist and author—could have been.

  36. Lash says:

    “Go back to Univision.”

    So I’m not the only one, right, who first thought he heard a dismissive “Go back to Mexico”?

    [CH: trump is a smart, prepared man. he knew the ear-pleasing association his remark would evoke in listeners.]

  37. mendozatorres says:

    Was watching The Running Man last night. Felt the intro was a bit to prescient for my taste:

    By 2017 the world economy has collapsed. Food, natural resources and
    oil are in short supply. A police state, divided into paramilitary
    zones, rules with an iron hand. Television is controlled by the state
    and a sadistic game show called “The Running Man” has become the most
    popular program in history. All art, music and communications are
    censored. No dissent is tolerated and yet a small resistance movement
    has managed to survive underground. When high-tech gladiators are not
    enough to suppress the people’s yearning for freedom……more direct
    methods become necessary.

    • Hugo Stigltz says:

      The movie did the book no justice.

    • mendozatorres says:

      Agreed! Read the book a few years back and enjoyed it much.

    • Kyo says:

      Read all four of those “Bachman Books” (they were once printed together until King realized he could quadruple his profits by separating them). They are all excellent and prescient in different ways.

  38. elmer says:

    Some estimates are that 2 million people were killed during the Mexican Revolution, which spasmed across several decades about 100 years ago. My old man had a story about revolutionaries briefly invading his border town and leaving a bullet hole in his bedframe after they had evacuated their house. Not having much background on that protracted struggle I wonder how the genocide then reflects any of the Mexican’s framing of immigration now.

    • Diversity Is Good says:

      Some estimates are that 2 million people were killed during the Mexican Revolution, which spasmed across several decades about 100 years ago.

      And refugees from that war were the first Mexicans allowed into SoCal. Los Angeles was a white town with a tiny black and Chinese minority prior to about 1920 or so. There were huge tent cities all along parts of the border; Naco, Nogales, Tijuana, etc. Not Juarez, though, Pancho Villa captured it for access to El Paso gun runners.

      My old man had a story about revolutionaries briefly invading his border town and leaving a bullet hole in his bedframe after they had evacuated their house.

      Your old man grew up in Columbus, New Mexico?

      • elmer says:

        My grandfather was an American railroad worker and spent most of his career in Mexico. My dad lived in Nogales and Bisbee Arizona after spending his early youth in Sinaloa. The incident happened in Nogales in the 1920s. There were numerous incidents during that time other than the Columbus invasion.

        Watching “Treasure of the Sierra Madre” is like seeing my dad in a movie as he reminded me a lot of Bogart.

  39. ErogenousJones says:

    Going by the huge number of latino sounding handles commenting on this YouTube video, I’d say Mexico is pissing it’s collective pants right about now. Lots of anti-White vitriol being displayed… a good sign.

    There is no such thing as “white privilege”, but there is a true exceptionalism that does exist among Whites: freedom from the affliction of tribalism… and it is a wonderful thing.

    • mendozatorres says:

      If these Latinos are brazen enough to let their hot-bloodedness get the better of them, they’ll piss off the wrong “gringo” and get their ass handed to them.

  40. heavythoughts says:

    Your fear of that which is foreign is loathsome.

    [CH: your cuck love of that which is foreign is gay.]

    Your aversion to losing your cultural identity boards on psychopathic.

    [au contriare. i would say your antagonism to retaining a cultural identity is psychopathic.]

    It would be little wonder if you resorted to outright aggression at mere sight of them, while secretly desiring to eliminate their presence to secure a presumed state of purity.

    [nah, i have no beef with turd worlders, as long as they stay in their own countries.
    ps i’m feeling my existence causes you to resort to outright aggression.]

  41. Anonymous says:

    Trump = alpha
    Shitlibs and cuckservatives = beta (i.e., have to buy votes through bribery and appeasement of Sandra Flukes, dindus, and illegals)

  42. elmer says:

    The Mexican government waged a campaign of extermination against the Yaqui and other northern Mexico Indian tribes well into the 1920s. When one sees a figure like Ramos (who’s daughter works for Clinton) denouncing Trump’s alleged racist immigration rhetoric you wonder just who’s racist policies are being advocated. The racist charge swings both ways if you examine history in enough detail. Is it an overt racist policy of the Mexican government to drive their indigenous people into the United States for purposes of ethnic cleansing and proxy control of their former territories in the Southwest?

    Given the regional and ethnic variations among U.S. Hispanics as well as their complicated history Trump with some analysis and finesse could carve out significant voter blocs among them.

  43. V says:

    Compare this to Bernie Sanders’ speaking event in which he allowed the stage to be commandeered by a couple loser activists. Strength vs weakness. Leadership vs losership.

  44. The Straw That Stirs the Drink says:

    TRUMP: “Go back to Univision”

    JEB:” I think reporters should be treated with a little more respect”

    Never have two candidates platforms been reduced to such pithy statements.

    http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/jeb-bush-trump-should-be-held-account-just-me-n416471

  45. Old Dog Here says:

    “It’s probably more a case that Ramos is just a retard.”

    He’s not a retard; he’s a committed Leftist Revolutionary and if not an actual covert agent for La Raza, certainly a Fellow Traveler.

Leave a Reply