Where pretty lies perish.
I think that I shall never see
Women as varied as these three.
A woman whose slender waist is prest
Between her shapely butt and breasts;
A woman who looks at God all day,
To thank Him for her face He made;
A woman who may in Summer wear
A tent of canvas round her rear;
Beneath whose bottom darkness falls;
And megafauna repair to doze.
Poems are made by fools like me,
But that big mama fell out the ugly tree.
When a German says "I'm being deadly serious", he's being deadly serious.
"hypergamous disengagement"
The visitors scoured the brittle pamphlets, unearthed in a climate controlled trove that survived the centuries. They had questions. Did this extinct race of intelligent beings understand the nature of the threat facing them? If so, did they attempt to avert the catastrophe?
For the vistors, a fortuitous, sex-specific genetic mutation saved them from a similar fate. What they wanted to know was whether another species tried to adapt to the same fertility pressures in their own way?
The lead investigator tugged at a yellowed printout of an ancient text. He blew off the dust.
"Dread Game"
Further examination of the writing offered an answer. They knew. Or someone knew, and tried to send the message. A blueprint to save their species.
Further down the pile of papers, another entreaty.
"III. You shall make your mission, not your woman, your priority
Forget all those romantic cliches of the leading man proclaiming his undying love for the woman who completes him. Despite whatever protestations to the contrary, women do not want to be "The One" or the center of a man's existence. They in fact want to subordinate themselves to a wothy man's life purpose, to help him achieve that purpose with their feminine support, and to follow the path he lays out. You must respect a woman's integrity and not lie to her that she is "your everything". She is not your everything, and if she is, she will soon not be anymore."
It was, the visitor would later report to its superior, indirect proof of a cosmic law that directs the will of all advanced life in the universe. A sign, at last, of a Creator.
Inside women there are two wolves.
"I can make it better"
"I did that"
There are some fantastic archival photos of Reich era Germans smiling and laughing while jews in yellow stars skulk in the background.
The jew today says this is because the Germans were callous toward the suffering jews.
In reality, Germans were smiling because they were happy that their society was once again recognizable to them.
And, the jews were skulking for the same reason.
Civilization Cycle Theory and the JQ aren't mutually exclusive. A poster here makes an analogy to the serpent in the Garden of Eden. Just because Eve was weak and sinned, doesn't mean the serpent isn't culpable in the deceit.
Removing jewish influence from day to day operations of the empire would help heal the most gangrenous wounds, but the timetable of empire decline and decay of the people's virtues would remain roughly ten generations from the nation's inception.
Some cities within that declining order would survive and bristle with vitality. More relevant, there would be rural outposts that become seeding grounds for renewal, as happened many times before in European history. What we can say for certain is that separation from jewish corrupting influence will help us manage our own decline, and lead our people to the nation-creation rebirth that starts the cycle anew.
National Racialist or Racial Socialist.
Two ways to say National Socialist without saying it.
I recall reading on here that the biggest problem for jews is the globalization of Noticing.
In the golden olden days, when jews overstayed their welcome, they left (not always of their own accord) and ran the same schemes in a new town. Arrive, become hated, get kicked out, settle elsewhere, become hated, get kicked out. Repeat the process ad nauseam.
jewish group strategy succeeded with this blueprint because the accumulated benefits outweighed the costs of an occasional Local Noticing. But now that the Noticing has gone worldwide, jews can't just pack up, or progrom out, for a new White town to profit skim and culturally denude. All those escape destinations have been closed off by the rapid transmission of Gentile knowledge.
The result of this new reality is that jews feel a lot of internal pressure to stand their ground where they are, and force the natives to accommodate the imposition of jewishness. It has also turbocharged the jewish strategy of buying off, or blackmailing, the elites of White societies, to guarantee their protection from the angry peasantry.
The whole dynamic feels very much like a pressure cooker left unattended for too long. An irresistible force meets an immovable object. No one will give an inch. No side will concede anything. Mass surveillance systems and psy ops mindrape are deployed with increasing urgency, while barriers to clear thinking and truthful reality are felled every day. The tectonic plates continue to rub along the fault line, building up immense seismic energy.
Honestly, it will be a miracle if this resolves in a controlled manner.
Jeffrey Epstein: Woody Allen role-playing as the Marquis de Sade.
Epstein was deliberately creepy. He adorned his walls with the most off-putting "art" and littered his pricey shtetl with pedo-suggestive decoratives.
He had to have known the image he was cultivating and forcing on anyone who paid him a visit. Ask yourself, what kind of person would want visitors and acquaintances to feel uncomfortably creeped out?
And then ask yourself, what kind of visitors would NOT feel uncomfortably creeped out by all that creepiness?
My only quibble with the Gadget summary is the assumption that the jews' numerical minority status is easily overpowered or ignored by Whites, when it should be more obvious that jews use their money and information gatekeeping as a force multiplier of their influence over White societies.
Otherwise, yeah, the future for Whites is looking more and more like one that is separated from the concerns of jews.
Joyce Kilmer wept. Nevertheless, in our diverse country there are many sub-populations that would choose Serena over Anna, Tyra over Heidi, and Pepper over Salt.*
*The commentors age limits pop references of beautiful women to sometime after the fall of the Twin Towers.
Wipe this anti truth PC bullshit statement from the neurons in your brain.
> “Anti-Truth”
That needs to become a meme [if it isn’t one already].
All of Tyra’s traits which would be commonly seen as attractive are more typical of White women than of Black women anyway (and she’s obviously got a lot of White blood). As for Serena, yea right!
As for Serena, yea right!
Now now… there are beta bitchboys who are into dominatrices.
And there are very masculine men who view other men as girls.
This is a relativity thing.
Beauty is beauty, but what a man needs as an individual, and what is going to be considered a more or less advantageous trait, varies.
Some men view the square jaw and horse face common among average European women as deal-breaker ugly. A European man looking at the same face may consider it non ideal, but not boner killing.
It is incorrect to constantly compare a black female with an athletic skill (Serena Williams) to white women who just stand around all pale and stiff like the English Patient.
Serena cannot spend all her time being “hot” because she has a career taking white women to court and spanking them in front of an audience.
http://divasanddorks.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Serena-Williams-Late-Show-tight-red-dress-Victoria-Beckham.jpg
You may now continue with your hate fest
Yes, we will continue our truth fest of hate facts. Does it hurt when numbers like these slide between your ribs?
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/everyones-racist-except-black-women/
Well good for you thwackie,speaking up fo da sistazz!! But Serena? I see her sweating a lot…not good.
The Williams sister are not hot despite their athletic abilities mainly because they are taking performance enhancing hormones. This is why they look so masculine. They are very unattractive, regardless of what SWPLs say.
The Williams sister are not hot despite their athletic abilities mainly because they are taking performance enhancing hormones.
——————————————————————————————–
A typical white man, won’t give black females credit for ANYTHING.
(((shakin my head)))
Look, its one thing if you don’t want to credit them for being attractive; but to dismiss their tennis game by claiming they take PEDs?
Come on man, don’t punk out on me. These girls have been training since they were 7 years old with a very strict and disciplined BLACK MAN; what did you expect would happen?
Maybe this is why white people don’t want black children to have fathers in the home?
The Williams sisters are ugly. Serena is a jacked up hulk, all traces of femininity destroyed in her. Most female tennis pros don’t look like them, although it’s trending in that direction thanks to a societal push to turn women into men via the magic of hormone therapy.
Okay, then I can’t wait to see all the comments about how female athletes in general tend to look like dudes.
Do I hear the sound of crickets?
For some reason, African women who aren’t models or trophies of European men are being compared here to European women who are models or trophies of European men. If we were to do the same, you would notice how stupid that is.
I would normally golf clap that fairly witty piece of doggerel, but as these primates and their enablers launch us into another bankrupting and ill-thought war, that gets a standing o.
That poem brought a tear to my eye.
And spittle to my monitor.
I vote for the one in the Red dress for 1st place. Blue dress 2nd place and Aunt Jemima distant 3rd. Disclaimer: I have been brainwashed by media to prefer slim women that have 70 % waist to hip ratio.
I vote blue, then red. Red’s too bony. But nonetheless, Michelle comes in dead last.
Two beauties with amazing grace and one brute wit da booty dat does double duty.
(That Spanish princess is a diez from behind and anyone who says otherwise is el retardo.)
(That Spanish princess is a diez from behind and anyone who says otherwise is el retardo.)
She’s too old to be a diez. Maybe when she was 20.
Not that it invalidates the sentiment, but it seems the photo is fake: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/photos/derrieres.asp
(Obviously that’s still what the 3 individuals in question do look like but the composition is faked. YMMV as to how important this is.)
If you’re comparing their fashion sense, I’m sure that would be very relevant. But in comparing the beauty and femininity of the two on the left to Obama’s wife, it’s not relevant at all.
the photshop actually downplays her size because she’s taller than those two and they look taller than her in the pic.
Exactly.
Snopes is BS, so…
frankly she’d be worse in a dress like those, but it’s good to acknowledge and then ignore the snopes. the important thing is she could never approach either of the others, in any clothes, on any day.
Faked or not, Shanaynay still loses.
On an unrelated note, my daughter missed the bus. I ran over to the high school to drop her off, and… Spent an hour crawling through a line hundreds of cars long.
Hundreds upon hundreds of spoiled, coddled, overprotected little children who are so precious they can’t be made to ride the stinky old bus. It’s shocking to learn this, I know, but every single one of the girls I observed getting out of cars was FAT.
Normal weight females have become an endangered species in the USA. Maybe if little Jessica and little Cyndy-Lou there had to WALK somewhere once in awhile, they might not weigh so damn much.
I have concluded that suburban America is completely insane, and I’m seriously contemplating a move to Argentina.
As the sentiment is the entire point of the composition the fact that it was composed invalidates nothing so long as it was not manipulated to exagerate the sentiment.
If the images show the truth, the composition is truthful, despite being “fake.”
Poems are made by fools like me,
But -yours- is the name of number three.
Off topic but topical nonetheless:
I’ve long ceased the fruitless task of engaging the shrieking hoards of cyber-shrews, in debates concerning the inevitably catastrophic consequences of unchecked feminism.
However every now and again a story appears that illustrates the point so sublimely that it must cause a mental overload in even the dimmest hairy-nippled femhag.
The story:
Due to the disproportionate numbers of male babies being born to Asian women in the UK, it has long been an open secret that there must be wide spread gender selected abortions being carried out within that community.
To shed some light on the matter, a couple of undercover (pregnant) reporters took it upon themselves to see how easy it was to obtain an abortion on the sole grounds that the baby was female.
Needless to say the “doctors” (to the horror of feminists everywhere) were only to pleased to rid the world of these female abominations (for a price).
The question that must cause the fem-nuts brains to explode is this: If, as they preach – a woman should be allowed to do what she likes with her own body and the foetus is nothing but a “worthless” bundle of cells – why shouldn’t we be allowed to destroy them regardless of the reason?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2412031/Doctors-prosecuted-gender-abortions-public-interest.html
There is a tragic irony in that story. What kind of Asians? “Thank you, come again”, “Sucky, sucky, 5 dolla” or “death to all infidels”?
It’s the UK. We’re talking about the “Aloha Snackbar” crowd.
Most of the “gender-selective” abortions in Britain are done by Indians(Sikhs and Hindus) not Muslims, because Islam prohibits abortions and infanticide .
If a Muslim wants to have a baby boy, they’ll just have more children, whereas as Sikhs and Hindus have fewer children on Muslims, so they’re under a lot of pressure to have a boy baby, that’s why female foetocides and and infanticides are really common in India and even China, but not so much in Pakistan.
For some reason, many Americans can’t distinguish Indians from Muslims, and that’s why Muslims get a bad rap.
Yup.. Itz them Indians who be blowing up shit all over the planet, declaring jihad and grooming lil girls in the UK, not the effin Muslims irrespective of ethnicity.
The model minority in the US with the highest per capita income and pretty much no effin crime – thought that was the Indians.. my bad, guess it was the muzzies!
There are sewer rats… and then therez Moe!
I don’t get all the black women bashing that takes place on this blog. If black women are group of women that you all deem so physically unappealing, why are they even on your radar at all?
[CH: She’s the First Lady. She’s gonna be on everyone’s radar. Lemme explain what this is about. In short, it’s about sticking it to hypocritical SWPLs who pretend to fawn over M.O.’s amazin’ grace. They know she’s not amazin’. But they lie for status points with their fellow SWPLshits. Then, one sunny morning, they stumble into this outpost of raw humanity, and walk like unsuspecting children into a hail of hot id-lead. For no quarter is given to hypocrisy or lies here. No quarter at all.]
Because if black men offer next to nothing, and black women are … an acquired taste, why create so much social economic drag propping up blacks.
Some people will never play at the same level as others. Do you see NBA teams spend time training 5’6 white man to be a basketball player. At some point you need to devote resources to social causes that will pay off.
Who are the broads on left – looks like Putin’s new 20-ish Russian gymnast girlfriend
I just found from Polynices’ link (above) that our Spanish beauty is (or was at the time of the photo) 36 years old! This goes to show you that it is good to be rich. It keeps you looking great. I am constantly reminded of this when I walk around places like Manhattan, Greenwich, CT, and Beverly Hills. A trip to Detroit, however, is a stark reminder of the ugliness of the hinterlands.
Pavlov,
You represent the typical white and their stunted weirdo sexuality.
[CH: This should be good.]
Red dress: has the body of a prepubescent – is that a boy/girl/ or tranny ??
[Never saw a prepubescent boy with such an obvious hourglass figure. Where do you hang out?]
Blue dress: body of a teen boy
[Fascinating. Do you secretly yearn for boylove? I mean, if everything in the world looks like a teen boy to you…]
Third dress: actual female with hips and ass, that is unambiguously female upon sight.
[Try-hard.]
Why do white people have such weirdo sexuality ????
[Japanese have even weirder sexuality. Tentacle porn is about as weird as it gets.]
you seem to prefer women with bodies of boys, children, trannies,
[When you take the Rorschach test, do you always see a lightly tufted pre-teen boy’s member?]
OR just plain does not seem to indicate fertility.
[It appears that the lower down the evolutionary scale of humanity you go, the more you prefer your women have the size, shape, color and texture of Africa’s great thunderous megafauna. Don’t forget the texture.]
Don’t worry al my Pepper loving friend. If you read Heartiste’s twitter feed, you’d see that now I have to teach social justice and racial profiling in my history of astronomy course.
http://science.slashdot.org/story/13/09/05/2258211/lowell-observatory-pushes-to-name-an-asteroid-trayvon?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
It should even out the “bigotry” of this blog now.
What the hell are you talking about, al? Look at our Spanish princess (what’s-her-name). Just look at her awesome body ratios: you don’t need a tape measurer to see they are nearly perfect. That hair: I even would like to fuck her hair. Moochelle’s ass is at least three time the size of either of the other girls’ fine asses. Our wonderful First Lady hasn’t one attractive body part. And Moochelle’s hair? Well … I think I can clean my sink with it. But it might scratch.
I do believe al is one of those elusive weirdo chubby-chasers.
Negros don’t grow hair, they grow wool. It seems the mass media has adopted the policy of never showing a negress with their natural wooly fro’s. That wool must be ironed out and made to look like European hair before their allowed to go in front of a camera. I suppose the media masters are afraid those wooly fro’s will make negros look strange and alien to the host nation they are pushing to miscegenate with them.
What type of porn do you masterbate to if you wouldn’t pick blue and red dress.
The woman center and right look like clients entering a exclusive club. The one on the left looks like; ‘The Help’.
Do you often mix up your rights and lefts?
Who invited Aunt Jemima to the party?
Libtards are ugly inside and out. No surprise that they contribute the least to charity, care more about animals than other human beings and having the majority of felons vote for them.
Typical libtard couple: Ball cutting manjawed alpha married to a sissified closet homo beta.
Libtard couples: where men are women and women are men.
. . . and the sheep don’t give a fuck.
I’d allow the red dress first dibs on having a shot at me, blue gal second. Their personal maid would have to stay at home that day though. Carting the help around is rather passé in this modern age, you’d think they’d leave her back at the estate.
lzozlzozlozlzozlzozozozozozlzozolzlzlzozlzl LMFAO
“A thing of beauty is a joy for ever:
Its loveliness increases; it will never
Pass into nothingness; but still will keep
A bower quiet for us, and a sleep
Full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing.”
– John Keats
Late 30 something Pricess Letizia of Spain and 40 something Carla Bruni-Sarkozy of France both welcome your infatuation with their asses.
Aging feminists rejoice
Of course feminists will rejoice. They’re too stupid to understand the concept of exceptions to the rule.
A more interesting photoshop experiment would be Carla and Letizia v typical sweatpants wearing American coeds.
Never underestimate the value of a hot dress and heels
And THAT would put the aging feminist hamster wheel into overdrive….
Women built like this at these ages are pretty common in Europe.
Do men notice posture? How much does it matter? I think it makes a big difference, but I’m not sure if men notice or care.
[CH: Good posture is more an indicator of general health and emotional wellness. It’s also attractive in its own right, but not as critical as other physical cues of luscious hotness. A cute chick with the right body proportions will still be fuckable even if she slouches. Sometimes, slouchiness can even evoke feminine vulnerability, which is one of those temperament cues that turns men on.]
Yes, a fair amount and of course we do
The way they carry themselves is really the thing that drive’s a person’s impression of this photo… if Moochelle carried herself better this photo would have a third less impact than it does now.
Amy: “Do men notice posture?”
Fuck Yeah!
Men don’t consciously notice posture, but it is a hyoooge factor, as I have been saying for a long time.
It comes across as poise and self-possession, makes small tits look proud, and indicates a royal air, untouchability, manifest grace, the glorious, physical snobbishness of dimes. It affects your walk — beauty in motion — it is the bones upon which a girl drapes the rest of her qualities. The Foundation. I say it is worth at least a full point on the 10-point scale. BRING BACK FINISHING SCHOOL.
See FemX’s recent blog post on the ballerina Polina Semionova.
But then, I am a radical dissenter on the greatest shibboleth that this community worships: visual attributes are 50% to 60% max of a woman’s attractiveness, not “97%.” Despite the veto power of the physical (a slovenly obese woman cannot be a 5 no matter how charming she is). And, most importantly, despite the far greater importance of the physical for a woman’s attractiveness than a man’s.
Confidence, fashion, femininity, wit, modesty, submissiveness, mental acuity, authenticity (contra high-maintenance cosmetics), and the aforementioned poise can make average women spectacular.
Matt
cf. http://boomerhighway.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/girl_lg.jpg
cf. http://now.msn.com/melvfitness-personal-trainer-debunks-before-after-photos
cf. http://www.therulesrevisited.com/2012/01/posture-and-attractiveness.html [though 3% is an asinine number, as befits his asinine attempt to quantify the least quanitifiable quality in the universe: beauty]
I think white people have weird sexuality issues due to their genetic inheritance from the Neanderthal (as recently proved by modern science (but theorized by many before)). OR
Their sexual issues may be a result of having spent so much time in Glacial Europe during the ice age. This is how whites came about. “White” after all is essentially – ALBINISM – a genetically recessive feature that was able to thrive in Ice Age Europe due to the fact that the lack of sun light.
Theory:
You are trapped in an ICE AGE environment. Food of any kind is extremely difficult to find ALL the time. You live in caves.
Where as for other populations in warmer climes: reproduction is met with great joy, in the ice age environment it must be met really with horror. Even one extra mouth to feed can cause the starvation of the group.
The only reproductions necessary is the absolute minimum to continue the genetic line and ABSOLUTELY NO MORE.
But, how can reproduction be limited when a: everyone has a sex drive and b: most time is spent in close quarters in a cave ????
Sexuality itself has to be repressed OR changed. The object of sexual outlet must move from a fertile woman to infertile or less fertile objects. Hence:
-Pedophilia: prepubescent children cannot reproduce: not birth threat
-Homosexuality: no birth threat
-Zoophilia: no birth threat
-Sado-masochism: no birth threat
-Infertile/Lower fertility women: women with obviously boyish shapes are likely less fertile overall: less birth threat.
It is possible that white sexuality has in it an adaptation for birth control.
The other solution: channelling repressed sexual energy into violence:
Hence the white propensity for Organized Violence.
Freud theorized as much that the European penchant for Organized Violence as the result of a thwarted or mal-developed or supressed sexuality.
This is an amazingly cogent theory, if by cogent we mean off your rocker.
ps false premises are a non-starter here. you should know that.
Certain deviances are much more common among Europeans than they are among Africans. If you’re going HBD, you can’t flinch just because the truth doesn’t make Europeans look better than others.
You might want to ask yourself why Europeans prefer subdued sexuality and so heartily embraced a religion that demands it.
Traditionally, Mary was a virgin, and Jesus died a virgin.
Our older and corresponding deities were certainly not.
That’s easy Nicole, its the same reason why American blacks took on the religion of their slave masters. Most Europeans were forced to convert by their rulers. Christianity is a foreign religion from the middle east, it has no connection to the original European spirituality.
I’m just saying, the same disease will do different things to different people.
Wrong.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220120/White-people-likely-gay-Huge-study-reveals-highest-proportion-homosexual-people-African-American-community.html
This may or may not be true, but what’s very interesting to me is that no matter which comedic black actor who ever made it big, they were all made to dress and act as women by the illuminati who run hollyweird. Possibly re-enforcing this tendency? Who knows what their reasons may be. Dave Chapelle turned them down and had to hot foot it to the “motherland”.
Note the “American” in that.
In Africa, there is almost no such thing as homosexuality. I say almost because there are homosexuals, technically, but they are usually considered androgynes, and an extremely small proportion of the population.
It has been well known in African traditions for aeons, that fatherless men or men with absent, weak, or dysfunctional fathers, are more likely to engage in homosexual behavior for reasons other than androgyny/natural homosexuality. So there just aren’t many where there are strong fathers even though most indigenous cultures don’t mind it or believe it makes someone special.
The higher proportion of homosexuals among African Americans directly relates to slave genes and absent fathers. So it can’t be said at all that this is something that is so because they are African.
Trying to stir the pot a bit, al? Nice try. The cave dwellers flew to the moon. The hut dwellers … still there.
Whites are creative and fructifying. On the margins we will have all manner of extreme deviation. Same as we have almost all of the geniuses, we have almost all of the autistics. Same as we have the most sublime artists, we have the most depraved lunatics. Our marginal tendencies are practically irrelevant to our tendencies in the general.
Do you have a point, or have you entered this racial hornet’s nest because you know we have the strongest sting here? How’s that for a commentary on your own masochism? By your logic, such a deviancy means you must be white.
Matt
Let’s say that you are correct in that you have more deviants because you have more geniuses.
It may be your opinion that the deviance is irrelevant, but the fact is that this deviance has caused considerable damage to the environment as well as your own and others’ cultures.
Now, you can take the criticism and find ways to make it less damaging, or you can close your eyes and clap your ears while your daughters all twerk on video, removed from any kind of a healthy, fertility and family promoting cultural frame.
The hut doesn’t look so bad when you consider the alternative…but I think there can be a compromise somewhere. It has to start with reclaiming the things that sustained you for thousands of years instead of gleefully wanking on what is collapsing in mere hundreds.
It is interesting CH that you mentioned JAPAN responding to my previous post.
But there are in fact many interesting similarities between JAPAN and Ice Age EUROPE – in particular the very violent history and the fact that JAPAN is a small nation with essentially no resources – food being so scarce that for much of Japan’s history, food – rice – was money.
In Japan we find a prevalence of deviant sexuality like among whites – even more extreme:
-Pedophlia
-Homosexuality
Zoophilia
-Sado-Masochism: extreme: really a cultural core: i.e. Samurai ethic/Kamikaze
-Infertil/Lower fertile: Cultural obession with small, childlike women which suggeest infertility
-Incest
And we are all familiar with the Japanese propensity for extremely brutal organized violence – so much so, that they have been banned from even having armed forces.
(maybe a similar solution should be considered for Whites)
Its possible that the stunted/warped sexuality of the two groups and penchant for organized violent behavior is a result of an need to control/reduce population of the groups during their formative biological and cultural evolutionary periods.
Al,
Provide data showing higher rates of deviance amongst Western European males compared to other world populations. Your arguments may have merit, but I doubt it. Whites have the lowest penetration among the butt-fuckers: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220120/White-people-likely-gay-Huge-study-reveals-highest-proportion-homosexual-people-African-American-community.html Since American blacks are about 20% European, but are more likely to be shit-stabbers than are whites, we can infer that blacks’ white genes are reducing their odds of being gay. It is not white genes that are making blacks gay, it is black genes themselves.
As for some of your various questions, NW Euros have personalities that are open to experience and many are intelligent. The more intelligent one is, the more curious and experience seeking one tends to be. You can find evidence for these throughout the hbd-sphere. I think they are pretty basic. You then have to consider the disgust factor which seems to run about 65/35 whites with and whites without. Since 65% of whites (estimate for Republican vote among married whites) experience disgust we can likely infer that rates of zoophilia are lower than for races with an oppositional ratio. It is very common to hear of Arabs fucking sheep, but you don’t really hear that the average Swede fucks a cow. You should post data on deviance; I think your assertions will be proven wrong.
As for your contention that white men like women with subdued sexuality, you are dead wrong. Provide evidence. White men greatly prefer sexual dimorphic women with small wastes and big hips and big breasts; just check the top searches at Freeones. The top porn stars are basically all clearly dimorphic women with big hips and tits. Your contention is so idiotic and without merit. What you are mistaking is thinking that a giant donk is sexual. Yes, a giant donk might be sexual, but in a bonobo kind of way. A great round ass is awesome; a giant donk is animalistic. There can be a differentiation between that which is clearly womanly (small waist, big breasts) and that which is more rear-entry animalism (giant donk). To pretend otherwise is a joke.
Whites may have problems with sexual deviance, but I don’t see any evidence that it is worse than any other population. Post some data.
al, I’m confused.
You’ve said:
“Hence the white propensity for Organized Violence”
“European penchant for Organized Violence”
“Japanese propensity for extremely brutal organized violence”
“the two groups penchant for organized violent behaviour”
Are you really trying to say that – Europeans and Japanese are more violent than Africans? Surly not even someone with your impressive fact-denying abilities can really think that.
Or are you saying that European and Japanese violence is more organized than Africans. If so, isn’t this equally true for just about every human activity?
Or are you really just saying that Africans as a race:
a. have no propensity for organizing themselves?
b. lack a penchant for organizing themselves?
c. can’t even organize their propensities?
d. have a propensity for disorganising their penchants?
What he’s saying is that it is easier to convince a European with a 100+ IQ to be a sheep than it is to convince an African with an IQ of 80.
That says something about the “superiority”. By the going definition here, a virus is superior to any human.
Corvinus,
The study is specious, but to the extent that their is homosexuality in the Af Am community is likely a RECENT phenomenon caused by the destruction of the Af Am family since the 1960s:
-fatherless homes: homosexuality often being the product of subconscious desire for fatherly affection. i.e. sagging pants
-high rates of sexual abuse: mothers bringing over boyfriends – many who may be pedophiles- i.e. attracted to women with bastard kids – because they can have access to kids.
-high incarceration rates: like living in caves – the only sexual outlet available is with other men
If u are familiar with any African history (unlikely). Homosexuality was called and is still today (see Mugabe – ani gay rights)called, “White Man’s sex”.
Colonial advernturers, missionaries, soldiers, etc imposed/introduced it upon Africans during the colonial period – latter 1800s.
Gay.
Faggotry has historically been considered a Muslim vice, because of their religion making them cover their women in tents but left nudge-nudge-wink-wink loopholes for Muslim men to screw each other, young boys, or non-Muslim women. In medieval Europe, it was called the “Turkish vice”, associated with the Ottoman Empire. The term “buggery” comes either from the Bogomils or from Bulgaria, in the Turkish-dominated Balkans either way. Faggotry was known to have been introduced to East Africa by the Arabs.
Or are you one of those leftists who consider Muslim Arabs and Europeans the same, because both happen to be Caucasoids, or monotheistic?
Novennovum,
Not trying to stir the pot. Just making convo. Not clear that the “cave-dwellar” flew to the moon – as that event is widely believed to have been a hoax (as are many of the so called cave dwellers “acheivements” – but I get your point.
But, dont change the subject. Just trying to figure out why Whites have such weird sexuality.
For Example:
1. Look at streakers at public/sporting events
always WHITE – why ??
2. Nudist beaches/colonies
always white – why ??
3. Cuckolding- Wife Swapping- Swinging
almost exclusively a white thing – why ??
1. Because blacks aren’t there.
2. Because blacks aren’t there.
3. Because black men don’t get married.
Poorly phrased. Let me amend:
1. Because black don’t attend those events.
2. Because blacks don’t go to the beach.
3. Because blacks don’t get married. You can’t be cuckolded if you are not married.
al = obsidian. all the hallmarks of semantic fallacies and womanish passive-aggressiveness are there.
Not clear that the “cave-dwellar” flew to the moon – as that event is widely believed to have been a hoax
“Widely believed.” Right. Among those who think 9/11 was an inside job.
The Apollo moon landings represent the penultimate technical achievement of white people; and as such cannot be questioned.
But the clues to reveal this grand fraud are available for those who have the imagination to raise questions of the historical record not shown.
For example, why have we never seen any film/video of the astronauts INSIDE the lunar module while it is sitting on the moon?
Could it be that faking 1/6th gravity while inside the LM would be too difficult to pull off?
Think about it?
Once on the moon, you never see their faces? You never see them eat or drink anything, no comment on sleeping positions…
Even the “Nixon phone call” is not conducted inside the LM with their faces visible.
It never happened, but since you white people want to believe it, its not a lie.
Run hamster run!
Jumped. The. Shark.
Alas, my dear Thwackie.
Im sorry to disappoint you Matt, but all pretty lies must perish:
1. The check is in the mail.
2. Black is beautiful.
3. White men walked on the moon and returned safely to Earth.
If Lance Armstrong had a son he would look like Neil.
LOL
If you’re gonna jump the shark, do it in style. I won’t deny it, blacks make superb comedians. Stick around for the yuks, my brotha.
I still think you might be a white hipster from Williamsburg performing an excellent long-form comedy routine. But SWPL aren’t this funny. So now I’m all confused.
There are many inconsistencies in the way the moon landings were presented to the public. But, to argue that negates all the the other civilizational and technological achievements of the European race is just plain silly. I’ll take a relatively primitive “Sputnik” launch over anything that Africa has offered recently any day.
I’ll take a relatively primitive “Sputnik” launch over anything that Africa has offered recently any day.
——————————————————————————————-
will your Sputnik save you from feminism, gay marriage, liberalism and the general vagination of white culture?
Will it save you from the ooJ?
It may be true the white man has great abilities; but introspection is not one of them.
Go tha fuck back to africa.
Come on now wacky thwacky, introspection is one of the great abilities of the European race, just look at all the philosophy it produced. Europeans might even be too introspective for their own good. Anyhow, once the overlords, who forced all the feminist and gay marriage nonsense upon the white race are done with it, they will come after your black brothers next. Be patient, will see if your people survive the onslaught.
“The Apollo moon landings represent the penultimate technical achievement”
So what is the ultimate technical achievement?
(Shhh…don’t tell it…see if it works it out for itself).
……ok……
Nomennovum
can you try and be serious …for a moment.
why is “White” sexuality so weird ….. almost like the Japanese ?
I’m thinking of a single phrase… Oh yeah: fatty-fucking.
That’s sick, neph.
African men from a few cultures have a greater *tolerance* for fat women. Most African cultures have a custom of feeding women more when they are about to marry or want more children.
A very few cultures purposefully fatten women and keep them that way.
African men actually like roundness in the right places. They are not generally lusting after obese women for the sake of their being obese. When they are represented in art and in statues of deities, it is symbolic of fertility and abundance.
So there’s tolerance, but one is not to let things get out of hand.
Now you know why I don’t freak out about the fact that beauty is universal. Some differences will exist, but Africans with options don’t take to sloppy any more than anyone else.
Because most whites are libtards without any religion. The 1960s revolution made things much, much worse than they ever were before, except during the times of the Roman Empire.
But again, one has to ask how such ideas take hold so much more easily.
I personally think there is a kind of vulnerability due to repeated mass cullings and segregation (though military service, prison, etc.) of masculine men among your ranks. There is serious cultural pressure among Europeans for the men to be docile.
Over docility in the males leads to all sorts of weirdness.
al lives in the backwards Bizarro world. Up is down; down is up. He says “Hello” when he leaves, “Goodbye” when he arrives.
“Al”
Every culture tries to blame some other culture(s) for its vices. When syphylis first appeared in England it was called “The French Pox.” The examples are endless. Saying that certain sexual behaviors are “imported” or would not flourish if unknown is deeply silly.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22820207
Gee. Speaking of women. Guess who the girls really went for.
A man who games without remorse is hard to criticize once you face the reality of the female psyche. Just sad, that’s all.
Speaking of attractive types of women, with whom has Serena Williams been linked romantically lately? Meanwhile, TIger is on his (at least) 2nd Nordic beauty. Damn those Ice Ages!! Could there be some universal standard of female beauty?
Celebrities and athletes are not really good examples for average people. Average people can’t get away with what they do, and they have a whole different set of issues.
Yes, there are universal standards of beauty, but no, barring a very few features related to organ status, there is not only one thing each body part can be that is ideally beautiful. Many things are beautiful, but some things in the wrong place, on the wrong person, surrounded by other wrong features will just look horrid. A slim woman with well shaped, blue eyes, pale skin you can see the veins under, covered in tumors is not going to be beautiful to you as far as raw beauty. If you love her though, and I have seen many men love ugly women, you will pick out her best features and focus on those. Bonus if she didn’t let life break her, and she has a brilliant personality.
Despite your and others’ wishful thinking, there is no such thing as a healthy, especially nice woman, who does not have dick chasing her everywhere. Hot women have more dick, but the rest have enough that none of us is alone any day of the week except by choice.
So the average woman is, psychologically, rolling something like an overly selective alpha male. This is why there is no alpha female unless you take too seriously the greater options of hotter women. It is because it is not an accomplishment for almost any woman to get a dick.
KT Tunstall is not conventially pretty but I would empty my balls in her girly parts in a nano-second. And though she thinks she is a lezbiian, she would definitely want me to so.. Because nothing is as erotically potentiating as playing music together for an audience that gets what you are trying to do.
Nothing.
Obama’s marriage to Michele is basically a political one designed to promote his career in politics. An ugly white, or attractive light skinned black woman would have prevented him from becoming president. Michele is perfect because she is non threatening and thus helps collect votes for Obama.
When you run for president, it is very important that all women be able to identify with your wife. Michele plays this role very will.
Get off her dick.
Yes but he couldve found a goot-lookin black chick,one with some style. I guess in-the-closet-gays like shtrong womens! Now Mamie Eisenhower,shed a put some lead in ya pencil,eh thwackie??
He did find and marry a good looking African woman…but like all women do eventually, she got older. When African women age, they either get fat or they masculinize a bit before the wrinkles come.
Again, if you believe in staying in your lane, stay there.
****Personal anecdote warning****
When I was a kid, my mom, being a feminist, sucked at braiding hair. One day she sent me to school looking really messed up. I was embarrassed because, apparently being born to be non feminist, I knew what my hair was *supposed* to look like. I paid attention to my cousins’ and aunts’ hair.
I knew I was going to start getting picked on again even though I’d handled that little situation earlier.
Nothing.
Nobody said a word about my hair. Nobody noticed.
I returned home, and my grandmother saw my hair and laughed. She fussed at my mom for sending me to school like that. She told me it’s a good thing “white” people don’t know what “black” people are supposed to look like.
You don’t know anything about us, including how to judge our beauty for us. African women who African men would spill a drink on in the club to make her leave, some European men think are gorgeous. Some of us have enough of the universals for across the board appeal, but most women of any ethnicity don’t get more than a basic set.
What is good for one group is not necessarily good for another. African men have less tolerance for certain kinds of ugly. European men have less tolerance for certain kinds of ugly. Generally, we can take a bit of mannish or chubby, but we have issues about wrinkles and sagginess because this doesn’t usually happen to a healthy African woman until menopause. Sometimes not even then.
We have a saying: Good Black don’t crack.
That’s how this works in our lane.
What is becoming obvious is that the white men here and that includes the blog owner have a fixation with black women–most likely sexual. You cannot spend so much time talking about a group of women you claim not to be attracted to unless you actually are. Some of you need to come out of the closet–you are protesting way too much.
What happened the sisters won’t give you the time of day?
[CH: Seems you have just confessed that you are a liar. There are hardly more than a handful of posts out of nearly 2,000 total on this blog that directly reference black women.]
U mad bro? Not even black men want black women.
Yeah, that is what black men do to keep men from other groups away from their women is making you think they don’t desire them. And even with that black women rarely ever denigrate black men’s sexuality or manhood the way white women do who are always getting their asses kissed by white men.
There are black men that are committing murder in order to keep other men away from their women, why would they for women they claim they don’t want?
What I don’t get with white men is how most of you spend so much time pedestalizing white women and their beauty and whatever else. Women who do nothing but denigrate your manhood and sexual prowess while upholding the sexuality of men from other races (i.e., talking about how their biggest sexual fantasy is to fuck black guys).
There is nowhere on the net that I know of where white women are talking about how desirable white men are. You are a bunch of weak pathetic losers and that is why your women don’t respect you as men.
My interest in black women is not aesthetic. They have the least appealing qualities, from physical to mental to personality.
But I am thinking about a national campaign to Cream The Coffee. It’s no secret that getting a white man is a huge DHV in the ghetto, they are making bastards in their mid-teens anyway. Why not hold one’s nose and mass-spermify their open-for-business black holes and give their sprogs literally half-a-chance at life?
Black men fucking white women is a racial crime, a putrid corruption of the most precious storehouse of the most attractive race’s more expensive gamete. But the opposite is noblesse oblige, white loads bringing light and life to the dankest darkest crevices on the planet. White sperm is the best disinfectant.
Funny thing is, I never really entertained these thoughts before the inexplicable, abject horror of last November. I’m a reasonable fellow, didn’t have much to say about the savages savaging each other. But now dey all up in mah grille trying to Detroitize my back yard. Thanks for the wake up call. It may just divert us from our previously soporific trajectory toward the cliff.
Matt
*sighs*
here we go again.
Black men fucking white women is a racial crime, a putrid corruption of the most precious storehouse of the most attractive race’s more expensive gamete.
————————————————————————————————
My white brother, have you ever considered your woman may be trying to use the black man to force you to step up your lame game?
White girls have game too.
Im not going to sit the bench so you can look like a superstar. If a white girl says I EARNED the right to melt some snow Im going balls deep, hittin it with the shaft, Im stabbin it…
Do you turn down offers to drive Ferraris?
Do you turn down lines of cocaine at expensive parties?
Do you turn down the big piece of chicken at cook outs?
Stop holding the black man to a higher standard than you hold yourself. Who do you think you are, Greg Eliot?
then why even bring up Black women at all? Just don’t write anything about Black women. I mean, it’s the same script again and again, I don’t get it. If you have nothing positive to write about Black women, then maybe you shouldn’t write about Black women at all.
then why even bring up White men at all? Just don’t write anything about White men. I mean, it’s the same script again and again, I don’t get it. If you have nothing positive to write about White men, then maybe you shouldn’t write about White men at all.
Nice try, but I don’t go around harassing white men or stereotyping them or calling them ALL ugly for no reason. I don’t do that and I have said some positive things about white men. I have white male friends who are nice people, but what I disagree with is what constantly goes on on posts such as this. It’s nothing constructive, it’s rude and it’s ignorant.
To be fair, the CH does a considerable amount of writing on the pussification of European men. It’s just framed differently, so you don’t notice.
Take care that when pointing out his mistakes, you’re not making some of the same.
A problem isn’t solved…
I do not recall CH ever making statements that portray white men as being objectively inferior in any way. He has done that with Black people, especially BLack women multiple times.
He doesn’t have to say they’re inferior. He has made it very clear that far too many of them behave in an inferior way.
You have to read between the ego. Someone is going to speak differently to people they love than to people they don’t, even if one is saying the same thing.
Oh man, you just said you have ” white friends ” who are nice people, is that opposed to all the other whites that aren’t nice ?? lolz
To be honest, the portrayal of Black women as the ultimate unwoman is nothing new. It’s a meme that has been perpetuated in various forms for many many years. It’s a stereotype that we’ve been burdened with carrying. It shouldn’t surprise me, but with the advent of the internet, it’s just damaging to have these stereotypes put out there for unsuspecting Black women who haven’t had the chance to mentally prepare themselves to come across and have their womanhood, beauty and dignity maligned in such a way…and these stereotypes, whether you see it or want to admit it or not are rooted in a terrible history. They are socially-constructed byproducts of a racially-charged history, they are not inherent.
Really, this is just about respect. I would never say that all white men were evil, ugly, inferior or sexually pathetic losers. I’ve never said anything like that. I try to look at people as individuals and it would be nice if people could extend the same courtesy to Black women, but this is asking too much for people apparently.
Hammer of Love,
I just said what I’ve heard white people say about Black people time and again “i have plenty of Black friends.” If that offends you, then I hope you get offended when you hear white people saying the same thing about Black people. we have people on here saying far worse things about Black women , why don’t you get offended by those comments?
any way, the point I was making with my comment, although it may have been crudely worded, was that I don’t discard my friendships or relationships with all white men just based off of some bad experiences I have had with SOME white men. Even with my bad experiences, I still know that not all white men are the same, but for some reason…all Black women are the same to some people on here…we’re all these same stereotypes.
I don’t care if white men want to put white women on pedestal and kiss their asses all day and twenty-four hours–the main reason why their women have so little respect for them. I just wish they would not put down black women in order to do so. The photo in this post was used to do exactly that, period.
White men have been doing this for centuries. They have also denigrated the beauty and reputation of women of other races while placing their women on pedestals to be viewed as pure and the epitome of beauty and femininity.
This blog is supposed to be about destroying “pretty lies” but I guess old habits die hard.
and btw that picture of Michelle was photo-shopped. I honestly think she looks quite good, especially considering she’s over 50 and I don’t see a wrinkle on her. She has nice, long legs and toned arms. I think she’s very nice looking. But, everyone is entitled to their opinion.
I would love to have legs like these at 50 years old: (http://cdn.buzznet.com/assets/users16/recruitinanimal/default/gal-michelle-obama-legs-150–large-msg-124933188798.jpg)
Honestly though,
Can someone please honestly explain to me, what do you gain by lambasting Black women ( a group of women whom you find so repulsive) again and again?
Just tell me, what YOU as a man gain from doing that?
We’re lambasting the First Beard, not black women in general. If we dumped on Rosie O’Donnell, you wouldn’t think we were dumping on all white women? Black women do have an obesity problem and a single-mom problem worse than other races, except maybe Hispanics. I actually find non-overweight black women hotter than Asian women because of their far better figures.
I can tell you what they gain, but neither you or they are going to like it.
It’s what I like to call “social brownie points”.
When a group of people is up against a phantom like enemy they can’t see, or a great enemy they can’t reach, the closest they can reach are the “other”. So they pick out the least threatening/weakest of them to direct their rage towards.
Though most of their actual enemies, meaning those who put money and votes towards keeping them down, are too numerous and look like them, and may even live in their homes, African women are an easier target because they are fewer in the west, and somewhat distant. They have nothing to lose from expressing their rage towards women on African women because they are not their wives, and usually not their bosses, and probably not the people who would jack them up for “thought crimes”.
We represent the face of the enemy for them.
Since so many of us have drunk the koolaid, we volunteered to be the low women on the totem pole of feminism, so we catch this kind of flack. When social status replaces beauty, or when there is an attempt to make this so, the lowest status women catch the hell for it.
So brace yourself…
All you can do is try to insert some reason here and there, and not be the stereotypical African harpy looking to chew European men’s heads off for historical crimes the vast majority of their ancestors couldn’t even afford to commit.
thank you for the analysis Nicole, you may be on to something. I would truly like one of the “men” on here to answer the question though. I really want to know what they’re gaining or what they think they’re gaining. I probably won’t get an answer from any one of them though.
I think the real question might be what are Nicole and you doing here if we’re such evil, bigoted , misogynistic, racists ?
Because better an honest evil than a deceitful “good”.
Also, most of the guys here aren’t misognynistic or racist, just trying to dig their way out of an ideological hole.
The real racist is the one who wants to make everyone the same, and play pretend in the process of doing so. It is the one who erases the European in European American culture for political gain as much as it is the one who erases the African in African American culture.
You have been much more thoroughly erased than African Americans who are reminded of their heritage every time they look in a mirror, whether they choose to deny it or not. You just don’t know how deep the rabbit hole goes.
I was talking with a young man today about how despite going to high school on a military base, the only thing we learned about Polish involvement in WWII was “the Polish capitulated”.
You are not taught how utterly bad ass “white” people can be without a U.S. President telling them to be so, even when it’s not for hanging “black” people from trees.
Americans are basically educated to believe European men are pussies unless it’s in a uniform or racial panic.
…and then one day, if you’re lucky, you see an old photo of a four year old or less “white” baby carrying a makeshift bomb in a sewer in Poland, and cry.
You make some excellent points here which I agree with whole hardily. The real enemy is the the invisible hand behind the curtain, which puts a tiger and lion in a cage, and prods them both with a stick, till they tear each other to shreds. This is the essence of multiculturalism and forced racial and cultural integration.
Many Africans Americans have been purposely programmed to believe that the European Race is inherently racist and evil, mainly based a an event that happened in the ” New World “. However, they need to realize that a large percentage, or even majority, of “white people ” had absolutely nothing to do with it. Think about it, how many European countries participated in the slave trade ? Now, think about how many nations and peoples there are in Europe.
You mentioned Poland which is appropriate, since I was born there. My people have been enslaved and attacked by many different races and nationalities. For a very long time, the only Africans they ever saw, were the ones that were part of an invading army, which was raping, killing, and enslaving my people long before the ” new world ” slave trade “.
I think that black americans can free themselves if they realize, that the blame and bitterness is a trap that was set for them. They are being used, just like we all are.
@ Hammer of Love,
I already stated in my post earlier that I am going to respond because I do not want younger Black women who come across these posts to see these type of ideas and misguided theories and take them to heart. I want them to know that not everyone agrees and this is a one sided very biased opinion of a certain group of people. That is why I respond. And you called yourself evil and all that other stuff…I did not.
It was comedic sarcasm Peanut. Plus, I dont think that many black young women visit this site. I could be wrong though.
‘It’s what I like to call “social brownie points”.’
Shouldn’t that be “social whitey points”?
Actually, it’s because this is a safe space where men can call a spade a spade without fear of the Thought Police.
And as I’ve trumped you brown clowns with before, if all 33M balcks in the US went to sleep and never woke up, it would, in the aggregate, be a huge net gain for the country, not a loss.
You’re getting sleeepy…sleeeeee-pyyyyyyy…
why would you need to use your safe space to vent about Black women?? As a collective, Black women have very little power and as a collective have done nothing to white men. Why would you even need to waste your time with a group of women who really aren’t a threat to you at all?? That is what I’m not understanding…why not vent about people who actually are threat to you like the bankers and the men who look like you who overwhelmingly run things in this part of the world. Black women don’t oppress white men, never have, not in the least…
again, what are you all gaining by lambasting and stereotyping Black women, really?
I don’t particularly care for black women bashing, but in some ways you’ve brought it on yourself. I’ve heard a lot of talk over the years, about white men raping you, and treating you as sex objects. I think some of it may be a backlash to that.
A Black woman who is discussing being raped by an individual white man or groups of white man does not deserve to be bashed and no she isn’t bringing anything on herself. Recy Taylor and the Black women like her did not bring anything on themselves. It is the truth that there were Black women who were raped by white men, for the majority of American history Black women have legally been able to be raped, so that is true. For the longest time a white man could rape a Black woman and get away with it, not even be challenged by anyone for it, that’s the reality of history. Can’t change history. Does that mean ALL white men are rapists…no and I’ve never heard a Black woman say ALL white men are rapists, but the reality is it happened …and it damaged our culture and the perception of Black women. It really did.
and to add on to that, I would even say that a lot of the stereotypes about Black women and Black men, which are espoused on this blog are rooted in that history. Many of the stereotypes, which are advocated on this blog, the sapphire (the emasculating, overbearing, sassy Black woman) and the Jezebel (the over-sexed black woman) and the mammy (asexual, unattractive Black woman) were started because SOME white men who abused Black women’s bodies needed a way to excuse their mistreatment, so they dehumanized and objectified Black women by perpetuating those stereotypical caricatures and some people still adhere to these stereotypes in the present day. You can read up about it if you want.
These stereotypes are part of Western culture. Not all white men participate in this type of stereotyping, but it is a part of the culture here.
Therefore, when I hear a lot of the stuff that is said about Black women on here, I feel I must say something, but I know some people need to hold onto stereotypes for their own comfort.
and I know that this history and mistreatment of Black women probably doesn’t mean anything to most of the posters on here, so I’m wasting my time. But I just wanted to go on record by saying what I said.
Personally, I’d be more angry about the long, hot days of picking cotton, but I don’t think that appeals as much to your sense of vanity.
@ Lara, it’s not about being angry and it’s certainly not about vanity, it’s about pain. It’s painful to see these same stereotypes that were used to dehumanize my ancestors, the people in my family like my grandmothers and grandfathers being perpetuated and advocated and lauded. maybe you don’t understand what that feels like.
I’m not going to try to explain to you how it feels to have to deal with that, but from one person to another, we should both be able to understand what it means to be respected and I believe that everyone deserves respect and that is all I’m asking.
Hey Peanut. The other day I saw a fat, slovenly black woman loading bags upon bags of Bed Bath & Beyond merchandise into her big minivan. And I asked myself, what value does she bring to the table? I mean, to earn that minivan and those bags of goodies.
In Africa, she’d be beating her wash against the river rocks.
Stop bitching, you are in Negro Paradise.
But I understand where you are coming from. Racists fascinate you, and you want them to want you,
PA: I think you’re projecting in your comment. I never said anything about wanting “racists” to want me…where did you even get that from?
It’s the fact that you’re here.
We gain the truth…that the majority of you are stupid, ugly, violent and have poor impulse control. Just like most black men.
that is your warped perception of the truth, not reality.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/08/concealing_black_hate_crimes.html
and please lets not go there about “negro paradise” america…please. Any way, it is very apparent that some people will still stereotype Black women no matter what some people need to stereotype black women because it’s a comfort blanket. i get it. I’m done with this for now.
I said that I think Black women deserve the same respect as other people. That is all I’m asking, why is that complicated?
THIS is what black women looked like before they became obese animals or jacked Serenas.
That’s what most African women still look like…but this isn’t good enough for some of the men here.
It’s okay. We’ve survived worse than European men *not* over sexualizing us.
@ matthew king,
“Why not hold one’s nose and mass-spermify their open-for-business black holes and give their sprogs literally half-a-chance at life?”
seriously…Black women have been there and had that done to us already…enough white men mass spermified the entire Afro-Brazilian population into existence, a good number of African-Americans, creoles and Eurafricans all over the continent of Africa…we’ve had enough mass spermificaiton.
Thanks though.
since we’re making comparison, I just want to say that I love this pink dress on Mrs. Obama and I love how close she and the President are, they’re pratically pelvis to pelvis. They obviously really love each other and seem to be hot for each other too…
(http://static1.celebrityredcarpet.co.uk/articles/5/14/75/@/5908-did-first-lady-michelle-obama-or-first-1000×0-1.jpg)
Neither of those hugs show any sexual heat. They are both long married couples, so it isn’t really expected either.
In my opinion, being pelvis to pelvis and touching in the mid-region of the body, is sexual.
oh and this is a really nice picture of Mrs. Obama too,
(http://cdn04.cdn.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/obama-jleno/michelle-obama-tonight-show-with-jay-leno-01.jpg)
She has such good fashion sense. She’s a stylish lady and classy. It’s No wonder that some people were offended when she wore those shorts with her legs showing.
I always knew that Mrs. Obama was leggy… I didn’t know she was THAT leggy.
she has such nice legs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXCle1JXXVw) wow if i hadn’t come across this post here on CH, I never would have found this video.