
And a more truthful graph than the one you’ll find here.
A rascally reader adds: “They forgot to color a single arm for cute.”
ps Hi Jizzeblobs!
pps Attribution of this graph uncertain, but I think it comes from A Voice for Men.
Where pretty lies perish.
Jan 9th, 2013 by Heartiste

And a more truthful graph than the one you’ll find here.
A rascally reader adds: “They forgot to color a single arm for cute.”
ps Hi Jizzeblobs!
pps Attribution of this graph uncertain, but I think it comes from A Voice for Men.
Posted in Feminist Idiocy, Funny/Lolblogs
The value of a negatively-oriented racial identity is rapid threat detection.
The value of a positively-oriented racial identity is imperviousness to enemy defamation.
jews are really rattled by these kinds of memes. They especially recoil at the "will you believe what jews said about your ancestors, or what your ancestors said about jews" meme.
I think I know why. It's because these messages are inherently ethnocentric....for White people. This scares jews, because they understand better than anyone the power of in-group affinity.
jews recoil at these memes because they are a perfect reflection of the jews' own attitudes towards Whites.
"You wahms like Fifty Shades of Gray? How you feel about Fifty Blades of Lingchi instead?"
If this happens often enough, it will eventually eat into the company's bottom line.
Sufficient cost impacts on Flock would threaten its solvency.
If cost is no matter and the Flock cameras keep going up, then we'll know that the decision is not driven by profit interests, but by a totalitarian political interest to subjugate White Americans.
True, I've wondered about that as well. The technique evident in this 13th Century illustration is comically juvenile. Why was so much Medieval art so bad?
Turns out there are many answers to that question.
One, most Medievel Europeans were simply bad artists, just like most people today are bad artists. A lot of the lowbrow and middlebrow graphic illustrations drawn back then were done by random joes, who felt the spirit, but not the painter's brush, move them. There were talented Medieval painters but their works were less common and usually hanging in some rich aristocrat's castle.
Two, the rules of perspective didn't get formally established until the early 15th Century in Italy. Untrained amateur painters and illustrators before that time would not have been acquainted with proper rendering techniques.
Three, there is a lot of great Medieval art, but it was usually found in decorative works like book bindings or music boxes, not so much in painting.
Four, it is possible that Europeans lost a lot of Greco-Roman realistic painting techniques after the fall of Rome.
Five, there is a theory that Medieval Europeans held the belief that realistic paintings using perspective were "an affront to God", becaue it hubristically mimicked God's creation. This is a controversial theory, though, because realistic paintings were created during that time.
If they had MBA-credentialed management consultants in 1850, this house would never have been built to those specs.
"I'm sorry, but your shareholders would appreciate the labor and materiel efficiency savings"
Candy is dandy, but Kovyor is quicker.
MMA
(Mary Mother of Asskicking)
It isn't fascism.....yet.
(and the sooner it happens, the better)
From the forest you were born, to the forest you shall return.
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s Place

Best graph ever.
I’ve been raped with joy.
I think a better feminist chart would be to detail fit vs fat.
It would be purely pink figures as the fatties and two black ones representing the fit ones.
Took me a second to click in to the word edits on the graph.
Then i lol’d so hard i almost lost control of my sphincter.
Who would represent the two lone black sheep down in the corner? I’d vote Christina Hoff Sommers and maybe Camille Paglia.
I want to laugh, too. But somehow – and it might be sleep deprivation – I don’t get it.
Explain, pretty please!
I looked up the links. Didn’t know the original chart. All good now, nevermind.
>live in Tolerance Zone #65
> be nu-trans fourth trimester transsensual Angst Profile ZETA-8 genderqueer pseudo-dyke reformed lesbiophilic heteromollusc
>see cis thin white male at the zoo
>ask “mommies, what’s that?”
>they don’t know
>Genderless Polyamorous Parental Unit #2 takes me into a Safe Zone and engages the Feelings Shield
>tells me that it is a monster from the beforetime
> tells me not to be scared, because the monsters’ penisocracy was smashed by the forces of the LBJQGTA5 Coalition in the Patriarchy Wars
>start to cry
> s/he opens his and/or her rainbow mesh vest and retrieves an estrogen pill to cheer me up
>feeling the calming femininity wash over me
> s/he tells me that the monsters aren’t allowed to hurt anyone anymore, only to work, to support our glorious society
>throw Privilege Peanuts at him
>everyone laughs
> take some soma
> go home and read some consensus-approved feelings-safe literature
[…] Filed under: Feminist Idiocy, Funny/Lolblogs Source: Chateau Heartiste […]
I thought it said “poor equality” because they didn’t have any women rapists in the graph. My bad.
Loved the twitter response, don’t remember from whom, that sent me rolling on the floor with laughter wtih something to the effect of “you need to color one arm in to represent the cute ones.”
Thanks for the nod.
For those interested in a critique of this image (when it was about rape)
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/5836/24675342.gif
The original feminist chart was on rape statistics, and alleged that the number of false accusations was miniscule (the two lonely black figures in the lower right corner).
Looking for the real statistics, it seems that, per FBI statistics, about 8% of rape allegations get dismissed as “unfounded”. One researcher went to a small town, where the police had the resources to actually thoroughly investigate every forcible rape allegation. They found 41% to be false reports.
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/jbs/maysession/KaninFalseRapeAllegations.pdf
Breaking news: Hypergamy IS a genetic flaw. The highest mate value women have the LEAST hypergamic tendencies, and the women with the biggest gaps (heh) in their mate value are the MOST hypergamic.
Big. This is big, fellas. This basically means that, among other, staggering implications… game is eugenic, in the best possible way.
(Eugenic meaning to support and encourage the betterment of the gene pool. Eugenics has a bad rep, but anything that improves the gene pool is eugenic, and anything that makes the gene pool worse is dysgenic.)
http://www.epjournal.net/articles/menstrual-cycle-changes-in-mate-preferences-for-cues-associated-with-genetic-quality-the-moderating-role-of-mate-value-2/
Wait till you read the methods. Get the PDF, read the methods and data analysis, it will blow your mind. It also shows, in scientific terms, that lower mate value women have a bigger hamster.
Makes sense. This is also why you shouldn’t aim low. 5′s and 6′s are the main ones riding the alpha cock carousel, while also weaseling betas out of money and eventually into marriage. I know this from personal experience
Ok, what if the male has low value? Is it still eugenic? After all “game” is most useful to beta or omega males intent on fooling women into thinking they are natural alphas.
Wow, the oringinal graph is such a bunch of bullshit.
But what can we expect, girls playing out tired victim idealogies.
As for this one, I would make the ‘educated’ about 90% of that graph, thats where feminism spawns.
How the hell do they know how many rapes were unreported?
They do surveys. They ask “Have you ever had sex with a man when you didn’t want to?” For those who answer yes, they then ask “Did you report it as rape?” They then tabulate the results as their “unreported rape” statistics.
So they count surveys as direct evidence. LOL.
I wonder how many of those unreported rapes were of the variety of that one time she got drunk and let some ugly guy fuck her.
Hahaha This makes me chuckle with joy, Dumb Feminists and their lies are exposed even by the state statistics, Dylan you MF-ing moron.
http://www.explosm.net/db/files/Comics/Matt/Totally-not-an-excuse-to-copy-paste-all-the-characters.png
Works both directions.
[…] […]