If people are going to accuse you of misogyny, may as well enjoy the egotistic benefits of being a truth-telling misogynist.
***
Men move the discussion forward. Women swap recipes and beauty tips.
Men debate. Women wheedle.
Men confront. Women slander.
Men act. Women plot.
Men invent. Women benefit.
Men are passionate. Women are passion parasites.
Men cheat. Women betray.
Men withdraw. Women shit test.
Men kill. Women play let’s you and him fight.
Men are emotionally distant. Women are emotionally manipulative.
Men’s Achilles’ heel is pride. Women’s Achilles’ heel is vanity.
Men die younger. Women live slower.
Men think loftily. Women think grubbily.
Men are expendable. Women are perishable.
Men humiliate. Women shame.
Men bluster. Women preen.
Men break barriers. Women co-opt broken barriers.
Men design. Women utilize.
Men self-serve. Women self-delude.
Men fuck. Women barter.
Men are funny. Women are melodramatic.
Men look at the sun. Women look in the mirror.
Men sexualize. Women characterize.
Men eat. Women indulge.
Men aspire. Women inspire.
Men love freely. Women love desperately.
***
This post is bitch bait. It’s been booby-trapped. We’ll see who trips it.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:38 am I like these regular posts these days. Keep em coming.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:39 am If you were really trying to compose something that rose to the level of high theory I guess you’d have to make these statements more nuanced and less categorical. The male habit or identity or whatever disproportionately exhibits the former tendencies and purposes, the female the latter. You’d have to say this to begin to account for, for example, girlie beta men and strong, noble women, and all of the varieties falling along the continuum.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:43 am (Seran peers out of the safari bus, waiting for the gazelle to make the mistake of coming to the watering hole)
on March 18, 2010 at 10:43 am “Men fuck. Women barter.” Reminds me of that Nietzsche quote, how a man wants a woman for herself, but a woman wants a man to have children. Can’t remember the exact quote.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:46 am Ultimately, though, nature wins crushing victories, does it not? “Throw nature out with a pitchfork, and yet she will return.”
on March 18, 2010 at 10:47 am Misogyny is the path to the dark side. Misogyny leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:49 am What are you Charlie — yoda?
on March 18, 2010 at 10:54 am Don’t you look in the mirror too? The post would be more accurate if you listed it in terms of the masculine and the feminine rather than men and women. You could say it is masculine to eat, feminine to indulge etc. In reality, men and women fall somewhere in a continuum between masculinity and femininity. We all have masculine and feminine traits. Most men have more masculine traits and most women have more feminine traits. But often those with the right mix of extra opposite gender traits are those who do especially well with the opposite sex. I am funny when I am melodramatic. The joy of bisexual psychological androgyny.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:55 am This post is bitch bait. It’s been booby-trapped. We’ll see who trips it. for study purposes, this inclusion flawed your methodology. High ego females and males will not respond. Otherwise, it might have yielded interesting results.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:56 am Wow, feministx, you’re the very first person to have that brilliant insight. No one ever has thought it before, not even in this very comment thread.
on March 18, 2010 at 11:06 am Well, looks like feministx took the bait and got eaten alive. That was much faster than I expected. The post below it by anony is irony at its best.
on March 18, 2010 at 11:11 am Nature is sort of like the casino. The house always wins. There are exceptions, except there really aren’t.
on March 18, 2010 at 11:19 am I’ve been very useful shuttling relief aid to Haiti and Chile.
on March 18, 2010 at 11:23 am Men invent. Women benefit. My favorite. Civilization is a male creation, with females just along for the ride.
on March 18, 2010 at 11:23 am […] Jump to Comments Soon to become a trend in the Roissy-sphere: bitch bait posts. Men confront. Women […]
on March 18, 2010 at 11:23 am @Charlie You’re an idiot. And no, I’m not saying that in anger, it’s just a fact.
on March 18, 2010 at 11:29 am Handsome black lads stud;fat broads screw!!!!(if someone wants to screw them,of course!!!!)
on March 18, 2010 at 11:39 am Greetings Roissy. Seeking more info on the “shit-test”–I’ve got an idea of the meaning, but can’t find comprehensive def. in your archives. Put me some knowledge?
on March 18, 2010 at 11:45 am @MurrayHill The quote you’re looking for is: “For the woman, the man is a means: the end is always the child.”
on March 18, 2010 at 11:46 am “Men aspire. Women inspire.” Are you saying women respirate or that they provide inspiration for men? (either way men come out ahead).
on March 18, 2010 at 11:54 am Men have penises. Women have vaginas.
on March 18, 2010 at 12:02 pm I sometimes find other women funny, but they are never the attractive ones.
on March 18, 2010 at 12:03 pm God created man and thought, i can do much better then this and created women.
on March 18, 2010 at 12:29 pm I didn’t see a single booby in that post. It’s not one of those magic eye things, is it?
on March 18, 2010 at 12:30 pm “bik God created man and thought, i can do much better then this and created women.” This blog is not suitable for schoolchildren. Thy this instead: http://tv.disney.go.com/disneychannel/hannahmontana/
on March 18, 2010 at 12:35 pm Men are direct. Women are indirect.
on March 18, 2010 at 12:37 pm i don’t look at the sun. it makes me sneeze.
on March 18, 2010 at 12:53 pm Men have souls. Women have empty holes.
on March 18, 2010 at 12:54 pm Men confront. Women bitch. Men argue. Women bitch. Men fight. Women bitch. Men come to a consensus. Women bitch. Men enjoy the fruits of their labor. Women bitch.
on March 18, 2010 at 1:13 pm Men are polyamorous: Women cuckold. Men are OVERT: Women are COVERT
on March 18, 2010 at 1:17 pm Men try to impress – women choose. Nearly everything men do is to impress the opposite sex. Who has the real power? Men are slaves to love.
on March 18, 2010 at 1:26 pm Sexting Tiger Threatened To “Slap, Spank, Bite and Fuck Till Mercy” http://gizmodo.com/5496451/sexting-tiger-threatened-to-slap-spank-bite-and-fuck-till-mercy Tiger:Sent: 04″02 PM 08/29/2009: I want to treat you rough. Throw you around, spank and slap you Tiger:Sent: 04:06 PM 08/29/2009: Slap your face. Treat you like a dirty little whore. Put my cock in your ass and then shove it down your throat Tiger:Sent: 04:07 PM 08/29/2009: You are my fucking whore Tiger:Sent: 04:08 PM 08/29/2009: Hold you down while i choke you and Fuck that ass that i own Tiger:Sent: 5:00 PM 08/29/2009: I really do want to be rough with you. Slap you around Tiger:Sent: 05:12 PM 08/29/2009: For years. And punish you for not seeing me more Tiger:Sent: 05:26 PM 08/29/2009: Next time i see you, you better beg and if you don’t do it right i will slap, spank, bite and fuck you till mercy
on March 18, 2010 at 1:27 pm “Well, looks like feministx took the bait and got eaten alive. ” I didn’t notice Evan’s post. I said effectively the same thing. If I took the bait, so did evan. And as for the bait bullshit, ROFL. Alpha says “there is bait here”. Omegas say, “must walk on tip toes and watch for bait or else I’ll look omega.” Hot chick looks and says, “look at all those nancy boys walking on their tip toes. tee hee.”
on March 18, 2010 at 1:30 pm @lena An attractive man is one who has options; in reality a man chooses his lover, not the other way around.
on March 18, 2010 at 1:34 pm Men want women. Women need men. A solitary man becomes a thinker. A solitary woman goes insane. feministx.blogspot.com needs to brush up on misogyny by the #1 misogynist on wiki. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misogyny#Weininger
on March 18, 2010 at 1:41 pm I wish women swapped recipes
on March 18, 2010 at 1:41 pm @lena I think you’ve missed the point of this blog. The idea is not to impress women, rather to gain a psychological advantage over women so that they become a slave to your attention.
on March 18, 2010 at 1:49 pm Nice hair.
on March 18, 2010 at 1:58 pm @lena: “Men try to impress – women choose. Nearly everything men do is to impress the opposite sex. Who has the real power?” And yet without men you have no power…who has the real power?? “Men are slaves to love.” you mean: men are slaves to lust. women are slave to love.
on March 18, 2010 at 1:59 pm Poor poor women. I feel sorry for the silly things. See that’s what happens. You feel sympathy for them then they use it against you.
on March 18, 2010 at 2:15 pm The second to last one was rather kindly towards women. Roissy, are your feeling well?
on March 18, 2010 at 2:18 pm wow, i read the full transcript of tiger’s texts. talk about controlling the frame. i like his final text, “don’t fucking talk to me. you could have ruined everything. fuck.” this is definitely deserving of a roissy analysis.
on March 18, 2010 at 2:20 pm men are slaves to lust. women are slave to love. Women confuse lust for love. Most men know the difference.
on March 18, 2010 at 2:24 pm Wait, is the lying dumb dyke back here posting? Hello, cheap whore!
on March 18, 2010 at 2:34 pm
on March 18, 2010 at 2:39 pm i think i may be the accuser in question here, because I used that word in a comment the other day. Doug called me on it. what i actually wrote was “misogynist/misanthropic” and i had in mind the idea that peeling away pretty lies shows the ugly/true side of everyone, not just women, but since the subject of this blog is women and seduction, they come off worst. so in that sense, yeah, this is a misogynist blog, and a very useful and necessary one at that. but i didn’t mean it in the usual feminist-shaming way. sheesh, how long have i been hanging out here. I’d add “Men create, women consume” or something like that. If you look at any art or creative area – painting, writing, music, cooking, design, architecture, whatever – not to mention any science – 90+% of the field is men, all throughout history. Creation and innovation are transgressive – they require breaking of barriers and conventions. Taking new ground. So related to territoriality, a fundamental male trait, in some abstract but basic way. also – unrelated topic – this clip has its funny moments: http://www.theonion.com/content/video/hot_new_relationship_book_warns
on March 18, 2010 at 2:54 pm One thing does confuse me, though- “The Most Misogynistic Blog Post On The Internet” Like it’s not even the most misogynistic blog post you’ve made in the last week. It’s like a guy who would publicly announce that his job is being a white collar crime detective. How exactly does that work? “Hi Mr. Mafia, I’m a potential business partner. Let’s talk seriously. BTW, here’s my card. Look me up on the internet some time.”
on March 18, 2010 at 2:55 pm I think I’ve been spending too much time on this board. I was getting my hair cut today, the lady is a somewhat westernized India Indian, nice looking and single. She was talking about how this husband who shot his wife in front of the kids was an Indian, and the wife was her client. I came this close to asking, “So, he’s single now, are you going to write him?”.
on March 18, 2010 at 3:02 pm @namae nanka you forgot Florence Nightingale: http://books.google.com/books?id=totpAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA15&lpg=PA15&dq=They+scream+out+at+you+for+sympathy+all+day+long&source=bl&ots=9z8nGWQlFs&sig=ysuwy9SPRkQGd__vVH8ugTCXVfw&hl=en&ei=AkW0SsvCL4WYsgOtrvnRDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1#v=onepage&q=They%20scream%20out%20at%20you%20for%20sympathy%20all%20day%20long&f=false
on March 18, 2010 at 3:05 pm I wish women swapped recipes For the win!
on March 18, 2010 at 3:15 pm FeministX writes: “I am funny when I am melodramatic.” Funny how? Like a clown? Like you’re here to amuse us?
on March 18, 2010 at 3:18 pm The Most Misogynistic Blog Post On The Internet Really !?! Talk about delusions of grandeur and megalomania… Any garden-variety left-liberal post about Sarah Palin is far more misogynistic than this… This is just a effete attempt to be a naughty boy…
on March 18, 2010 at 3:20 pm Looks like FemX really is a passion parasite. “Men are slaves to love.” *Correction: males are slaves to their dicks.
on March 18, 2010 at 3:24 pm Don’t you get tired Mr Roissy of talking crap all day? “Men love freely. Women love desperately.” No way José. All men and all women have the potential to love desperately. “Love is a reciprocal torture” as Proust said. I have known men and women who have loved freely and desperately. It’s about who is the smarter/more attractive one in the relationship usually. Not confined to sex at all. You dirty misogynist.
on March 18, 2010 at 3:27 pm @Anou “It’s about who is the smarter/more attractive one in the relationship usually” Hardly, I’d say it goes to the person who cares less.
on March 18, 2010 at 3:30 pm Meet with a hardcore feminist for a 1st date. All we did was have a heated argument about the sexes- she would not admit that the sexes had any brain, or personality differences that were biological instead of learned customs and habits- i argued otherwise. she wouldn’t let it go- she loved the fight- and she so desperately wanted to piss me off, or have me back down and agree with her. i did neither, i went over to her and passionately made out with her. she was receptive. i sent her one text a few days later that she ignored. i want to see it through- yet i don’t know how to play this type of warrior feminist. Dr. paul would say she needs a lover personality to counter her warrior side- a lover that can also hold their own, and not be intimidated or cowed by her personality. i tried to play into this role and it worked. i have been with a few lawyers and they are easy compared to her. what is the next move?
on March 18, 2010 at 3:32 pm Sorry about the length of that last link. On topic, might I suggest you gentlemen leave behind some of the above mentioned neuroses and sample the nerd girl for a bit: http://www.rejecttheherd.net/forum/cineroom/-news/remember-winnie-cooper-wonder-years
on March 18, 2010 at 3:36 pm I have begun to dominate in a way that I could have never imagined. They fall very easily with my learned ability. After so many- I have begun to move up the scale for quality instead of quantity. i am no where near where i need to be- but i can see, i can see.
on March 18, 2010 at 3:38 pm Game in BK We’d need to know what was in the text before we could advise. Do tell [Men assume; Women presume]
on March 18, 2010 at 3:47 pm Helpful Dads Can Hurt Mom’s Self-Esteem http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20100318/sc_livescience/helpfuldadscanhurtmomsselfesteem game in bk: i’d say give her a call. she probably has a checklist that includes “not responding to texts from doods”. i like your thought process (i mean, except the part about dating a hardcore feminist). i think you will have to court her while following the feminist dating book rules a bit.
on March 18, 2010 at 3:49 pm Sonia Belle,I wouldn’t let Sarah Palin give me a b.j.!!!!(Though she probably gives LOTS of ‘em to that dumb Blaine doll,the “First Dude,” Todd Palin!!!!)
on March 18, 2010 at 3:50 pm I’d say give her a call too. What have you got to lose? I presume you have her number.
on March 18, 2010 at 3:54 pm I love the variable landscape women and men bring to the world. I wouldn’t wish for either gender to dissappear, or either gender’s traits. What you can expect from the world we live in after some years living in it is pain, darkness and betrayal. It shouldn’t be a revelation that a woman can be the source of this. It shouldn’t make you feel guilty or conflicted for loving and enjoying them still. I’ve realised the same thing about men. What I would wish for is a society of control and responsibility, where men and women alike take responsibility for the community and world they’re in, as well as the welfare of people around them. This is an idealistic world and ideals are impossible to realise. However, you can at least try to make it a personal reality where a woman uses her charms, manipulation and beauty to bring happiness and a man uses his powers for good likewise. A woman is said to be man’s greatest weakness. That’s so much responsibility and a power that is so easy to abuse. I wish women swapped recipes You’d have to know a recipe to swap it. femsex: Don’t you look in the mirror too? Mmm, mirrors. They can be very… *blush* Oh, where is my sexy and clever inamaroto this evening? How many frustrated nights have I spent asking this question? Where is he, will he come back to me? Oh, Doug! I am funny when I am melodramatic. The joy of bisexual psychological androgyny. Still, I think you’ve got more advanced mirror skills, girlfriend. Level 99. Anyone got a link to Her Hotness’ naked glorious picture so we can remind ourselves? FemX, the video you linked on your blog has moved me, together with your empathy of the bride made insane by her partner’s ohsohorrible refusal of her request. I have a solution for you that will be perfect. I think you should have a baby with your exact genes. A clone. I’m sure you can find contacts in certain places who can make it happen.
on March 18, 2010 at 3:57 pm Bhetti, wow. Or should that be Miaow?
on March 18, 2010 at 3:58 pm my intention is not “to date her” – conquer would be the correct term. if that means a few more dates- so be it. my text was simply remark on yesterdays festive holiday. feminist dating book rules??? what are they?
on March 18, 2010 at 4:03 pm you are just another neurotic white boy with mama issues. Nothing more, nothing less.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:04 pm maurice: Ha! Great video. I’d argue its related. Its a brilliant parody of the ‘it’s not my fault I’m falling for the same kind of ‘loser’ over and over…’ rationalisation. It can be a feminine flaw to not recognise how your own behaviour is contributing to a problem. I didn’t know what to expect. I was thinking along the lines of romance novels along the supernatural lines. Speaking of shapeshifters. Doesn’t the “author” of the “book” look like Clark Kent?
on March 18, 2010 at 4:06 pm my text was simply remark on yesterdays festive holiday Maybe she didn’t get it? Or maybe you didn’t sign your name to it? Come to think of it, did you ever give her your real name? I’m not a feminist, but I would think that a name exchange would be a minimum pre-requisite for post-Neanderthal dating. I think you might be putting difficulties in your path because secretly you don’t want to succeed.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:08 pm Bhetti Yes he looks exactly like Clark Kent, funny way of sitting though. The term “shapeshifter” sounds familiar – maybe it’s a form of magick? Roissy would know.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:08 pm Wouldn’t you just love to see copies of this being passed under desks at every high school in the country?
on March 18, 2010 at 4:09 pm I wish someone would just beat feministrix unconscious so we wouldn’t have to ever be subjected to her inane, illogical ramblings again.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:10 pm BTW, it is not misogynistic. It is just honest. Of course, to a feminist, honesty is misogynistic.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:11 pm Moderation: Avoidance of extremes of opinion, feeling, or personal conduct.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:14 pm feminist dating book rules??? what are they? feminists aren’t all that much different. they just shit test harder. and they’re rationalization wheel is turning that much faster when you’re not around. the key is to get in the same room with her, so you can turn off the wheel and start working the attraction. also, there’s always the pre-emptive strike. tell her, “i don’t know if there’s much chemistry between us, but i definitely like hanging out with you as a friend.” and then invite her to do something non-datelike but that segues into drinks.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:14 pm Miaow? What’s the difference between cattiness and bitchiness, love? – – – – Hormone levels.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:17 pm Sdaedalus: I was being vague. There’s a whole romance subgenre practically on shapeshifters: person to animal and back. The lines can blur very disturbingly, I’ve heard. And that’s your daily dose of Things You Did Not Want To Know About.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:20 pm She is HARDCORE. Or at least that is how she wants the world to see her. i think the only way to get her to make her believe you agree- BUT not agree. but when you don’t agree you cant make her angry. she needs to be dominated- but not by the club. i knew a girl like her once- naturally pretty but never did anything to look pretty, IE no makeup no fancy clothes. she went out with a man 15 years older than her. the girl i used to know also hated me and most men- me included.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:22 pm Bhetti: are you gaming FemX? Whatever would Doug say? JR: the pre-emptive strike sounds like good advice, as it allows both parties plausible deniability if things don’t work out as planned. PS What are you going to do if she doesn’t drink?
on March 18, 2010 at 4:26 pm Game in BK i think the only way to get her to make her believe you agree- BUT not agree. but when you don’t agree you cant make her angry. You’ve lost me there. I’d suspect you have this poor girl totally confused. Maybe you’re just too clever for her.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:27 pm What a great word, wheedle, hadnt seen it before.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:28 pm Bhetti wrote: Sdaedalus: I was being vague. There’s a whole romance subgenre practically on shapeshifters: person to animal and back. The lines can blur very disturbingly, I’ve heard Wow. The things I learn on this blog. Double wow. What sort of animals? I might be able to cope so long as it was a male animal. Gender blurring isn’t quite my thing.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:28 pm Almost all women need to be dominated in some way. A hardcore feminist needs to feel domination more than most- but NOT in an overt way. She needs to hear lip service to her viewpoints- but she needs someone to put her lips on a dick to service.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:41 pm A hardcore feminist needs to feel domination more than most- but NOT in an overt way. in my experience hardcore feminists want to be thoroughly fucked in the bedroom, if not outright dominated. outside of the bedroom… things get trickier. it’s best not to try for anything too serious. just be the guy she calls when she tires of “sensitive pony tail guy” and needs some dick in her life. JR: the pre-emptive strike sounds like good advice, as it allows both parties plausible deniability if things don’t work out as planned. for me, this is nothing about deniability. it’s simply a flanking maneuver to try if the full-frontal assault isn’t working.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:48 pm Never having been with a hardcore feminist myself (does Julian Real count?) I’d have to defer to you guys’ superior knowledge in this regard. But you do encapsulate very well the eternal struggle between the ephemeral and the physical.
on March 18, 2010 at 4:49 pm PS: J.R – et tu, Julian?
on March 18, 2010 at 5:11 pm So quiet. Sigh. You know I hate this.
on March 18, 2010 at 5:19 pm Do I have to say sorry before you will come (back)?
on March 18, 2010 at 5:24 pm men have their flaws. women have Wendy Schwartz.
on March 18, 2010 at 5:32 pm This is nearly as bad as being on moderation. A question from one piece of prey to the other: what happens to the prey when the bait has been taken? Maybe Robert Greene could provide an answer?
on March 18, 2010 at 6:00 pm So mean. Cruel trap. Congratulations – and goodbye.
on March 18, 2010 at 6:03 pm Hey, sdeadalus, this isn’t your phone. You’re not texting these people.
on March 18, 2010 at 6:09 pm One gets so involved with these sad stories, it is hard to separate reality from fiction. Now I really must go. This has been all too emotive for one night. PS: Learn to spell.
on March 18, 2010 at 6:33 pm Some days, the best part of Roissy’s blog is the unintentionally funny comments.
on March 18, 2010 at 6:45 pm @schmoe Thanks. Women have no sympathy . . . And my experience of women is almost as large as Europe. And it is so intimate too. Women crave for being loved, not for loving. They scream at you for sympathy all day long, they are incapable of giving any in return for they cannot remember your affairs long enough to do so. – Florence Nightingdale The Disciple asked: What is a misogynist? The Master replied: I do not know; but it is used by cowards as a term of abuse for those who say what everybody thinks. Cowards are the men who cannot approach a woman without going out of their minds and becoming treacherous. They buy the woman’s favour by serving their friends’ heads on a silver platter; and they absorb so much femininity that they see with her eyes and feel with her feelings. Agreed: there are things you do not mention in everyday conversation, and you do not tell your woman what is the essence of her gender; but one is sometimes allowed to write it. Schopenhauer put it best, Nietzsche not badly, Joséphin Péladan is the master; Thackeray wrote Men’s Wives, but that was suppressed; Balzac unmasked Caroline in The Physiology of Marriage, and Petty Troubles of Married Life; Otto Weininger, having discovered the treachery when he was twenty, did not wait for the revenge but left the scene. by August Strindberg
on March 18, 2010 at 6:47 pm Men think loftily. I think you are capable of thinking loftily Roissy. You’ve got potential.
on March 18, 2010 at 6:48 pm Anonymouses Anonymous Men confront. Women bitch. Men argue. Women bitch. Men fight. Women bitch. Men come to a consensus. Women bitch. Men enjoy the fruits of their labor. Women bitch. So true. I’ve come to find that it’s possible to stop women from bitching. Wish I had those skills from a younger age. God, the bitchings I’ve been unable to stop. Oh, the wasted time.
on March 18, 2010 at 6:53 pm Panda in reality a man chooses his lover, not the other way around. In reality, a man creates his lover. Take two puppies from the same litter and raise one by a self assured alpha, one by a mewling beta. Take any pair of twins and pair them off along with the puppies. Women are created by their men, not chosen.
on March 18, 2010 at 7:18 pm Hmmmm… http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/oscar_love_curse_iD9TNporBvaKlWwdRowaOK “Winning an Oscar is a blessing for any actress’ career — but for her love life, the award can be a devastating curse. In the past dozen years, nearly every woman to win the Academy Award for Best Actress has broken up with her husband, boyfriend or lover — some just months after thanking them from the award show stage…”
on March 18, 2010 at 7:32 pm “Joe: Looks like FemX really is a passion parasite. “Men are slaves to love.” *Correction: males are slaves to their dicks.” That’s bullshit bought about by women supposing men think like them. Women are far more sexual than men, and they are far more likely to be led by the clit (so to speak). But more importantly, men believe in love as an ideal. Listen to all the bullshit songs on the radio about love. Hell, even a man like Hugh Hefner said he still believes in love and that his latest playboy bunny wife was the one.
on March 18, 2010 at 7:44 pm I’m shocked to my toes. I had no idea you wrote poetry.
on March 18, 2010 at 7:57 pm Spring is definitely in the air.
on March 18, 2010 at 7:58 pm Men need the opportunity to cheat, women just need an excuse.
on March 18, 2010 at 8:09 pm Lesbians and bisexual women seem to think they are one of the guys. Femx, Strapping on a plasdick does not make you a man… just a wannabe with a severe case of penis envy. Your ersatz, Technicolor collection of penises does not create solidarity with the real Knights of the Order of the Protuberance. Now, get thee into the kitchen.
on March 18, 2010 at 8:14 pm Breeze But more importantly, men believe in love as an ideal. This is an important difference between men and women, that most of us find very difficult to see. Because women fall in love as hard as men do. But women don’t value love for loves sake the way men do. They’ll leave a man they are completely smitten with for a guy with better future prospects. From a mans point of view of course this is sick and twisted and self defeating. Women have different priorities. Love has a different value for them. Probably even a different definition.
on March 18, 2010 at 8:29 pm Vincent Women confuse lust for love. Most men know the difference. Difference? They are both just forms of interest and appreciation. Love and lust are different characters of the same thing.
on March 18, 2010 at 8:40 pm A woman invented white-out.
on March 18, 2010 at 8:45 pm Love is banging her even after most of the lust is gone.
on March 18, 2010 at 8:56 pm Bobby – no, that’s called a sense of duty. It’s a foolish emotion that’s easily used to enslave you into one sided arrangements.
on March 18, 2010 at 9:01 pm “…sense of duty.” Maybe. But Let’s see what others have to say about this.
on March 18, 2010 at 9:35 pm namae nanka – What about “The Taming of the Shrew”?
on March 18, 2010 at 9:52 pm @Laura – “I sometimes find other women funny, but they are never the attractive ones.” Yes ugly women are funny…looking. 😉
on March 18, 2010 at 10:06 pm “Men aspire. Women inspire.” Inspire to what? Take a dump on their wrinkly ass? Other than the above I have no objections with the others on the list. Women don’t like it? Tough. Truth is not politically correct, and truth will defend itself as self-evident without debates.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:24 pm It’s so lucky for me to find your blog! So shocking and great! Just one suggestion: It will be better and easier to follow if your blog can offer rrs subscription service.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:41 pm “Your ersatz, Technicolor collection of penises does not create solidarity with the real Knights of the Order of the Protuberance. ” Thank God. Women submit. Men lose. And women do not want solidarity with men who are losers.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:47 pm I was highlighting an aspect of objective reality. FeministX is mostly being a brat.
on March 18, 2010 at 10:50 pm Game in BK Why the hell are wasting time with a hardcore feminist? Do you have a deathwish?
on March 18, 2010 at 11:34 pm Well, fellows, it’s good of you let me know what my role is to be. Understand that I am capable of playing that role to the fullest. But there’s one thing I want to ask of you. Don’t yowl, howl, moan and whine when I meet your expectations…exactly. Pretty please.
on March 19, 2010 at 12:03 am Florence Nightengale, by way of namae nanka: Women crave for being loved, not for loving. Says it all, really.
on March 19, 2010 at 12:33 am In a way a lot of this is true, however in both cases (with men and women) it can be worked on and made better. For instance, I will go off on stuff to get it off my chest but I also like to come to a solution. There’s always room for self improvement for both sexes. I think a lot of negative traits of both sexes stem from selfishness. Relationships between men and women would work better if there was more caring and sensitivity for the needs of others as well as oneself. Best to be sensitive to each other’s needs and not so selfish…that’s the highest rate of sucess I do believe.
on March 19, 2010 at 12:46 am sdaedalus = alias clio?
on March 19, 2010 at 1:04 am “A solitary man becomes a thinker. A solitary woman goes insane.” That was good.
on March 19, 2010 at 1:32 am No. There is only one Alias Clio. But possibly her sillier little sister. [waiting for Clio to come in and tick me off here for misbehaviour] Mongo, yes I agree that the silent treatment is what annoys this woman most.
on March 19, 2010 at 1:37 am You both do that third person thing on your blog. Anyways, I never particularly took to Alias Clio though it seems many of the guys here think she’s quite the bombshell. However, I find your femininity to be totally magnetizing. Your personality has about as much feminine sex appeal as is possible. Whoever marries you is a very wise man.
on March 19, 2010 at 1:51 am Hey FemX Am I cute? [my new gravatar]
on March 19, 2010 at 1:51 am Damn – it isn’t coming up. Hang on there, it’s worth waiting for.
on March 19, 2010 at 1:54 am hopefully it will work now
on March 19, 2010 at 1:55 am double damn
on March 19, 2010 at 1:55 am Don’t see it yet. In any case, you’re totally adorable.
on March 19, 2010 at 1:57 am ok it says it takes 5-10 mins for avatar to take effect Fem x – i think intoxicating is a better word than mesmerising in that context
on March 19, 2010 at 1:59 am fem x – what a shame yr not really a man
on March 19, 2010 at 2:03 am “what a shame yr not really a man” No, that’s quite a blessing.
on March 19, 2010 at 2:10 am I guess it’s a question of opinion but it would be a bit of a dealbreaker for me re. any serious relationship with you FemX [going out with someone with breasts bigger than mine has never really worked for me] but we can be best girl buddies PS any idea why my new gravatar (so Lady-like) is coming up on my own site & Default User’s site but not on this site?
on March 19, 2010 at 2:22 am Agreed, part of your appeal is the heterosexual purity. Bisexuality or lesbianism requires sexual deviance which detracts from one of the major sources of feminine sex appeal, sexual innocence. You’re not my type, personally. I like vulgar slutty girls like strippers and porn stars. You’re a girl I would like if I were a man.
on March 19, 2010 at 2:22 am Don’t forget one of the most clear-eyed analyses of female (and male) psychology written in English in the 20th Century…. H.L. Mencken’s IN DEFENSE OF WOMEN Read the whole thing on line: http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=1270 (This is the heavily revised 1922 edition: The original version was published in 1918. See wikipedia, as well as Mencken’s own introduction to the work, for the full story) Here is the first paragraph: ********************* 1. The Maternal Instinct A man’s women folk, whatever their outward show of respect for his merit and authority, always regard him secretly as an ass, and with something akin to pity. His most gaudy sayings and doings seldom deceive them; they see the actual man within, and know him for a shallow and pathetic fellow. In this fact, perhaps, lies one of the best proofs of feminine intelligence, or, as the common phrase makes it, feminine intuition. The mark of that so-called intuition is simply a sharp and accurate perception of reality, an habitual immunity to emotional enchantment, a relentless capacity for distinguishing clearly between the appearance and the substance. The appearance, in the normal family circle, is a hero, magnifico, a demigod. The substance is a poor mountebank. ********************** Read it all. I envy those of you who are about to experience the gigantic pleasure of experiencing Mencken for the very first time. And don’t worry, he doesn’t let women off the hook.
on March 19, 2010 at 2:23 am You’re not my type, personally. I like vulgar slutty girls like strippers and porn stars. You’re a girl I would like if I were a man that’s okay then, no sexual tension to affect our gomance
on March 19, 2010 at 2:24 am sorry I meant gromance (chick bromance)
on March 19, 2010 at 2:26 am Or should that be gynomance?
on March 19, 2010 at 2:36 am ” It can be a feminine flaw to not recognise how your own behaviour is contributing to a problem.” I wish there were more discussion about this because it seems to be one of the core reasons behind the current imbalance of strength between men and women in the dating market. I cannot even count the number of women I’ve seen walking into the same walls over and over again in their lives and then whining about it as if the universe were deliberately plotting against them. It’s like when you see a little kid trying desperately to do something but failing at it repeatedly – you just want to walk up to the kid and be like “Jesus Christ, here…THIS is how you do it”. Except when someone does this for a woman she’ll usually ignore it and continue doing the same idiotic things over and over again, all the while wondering what the hell keeps going wrong.
on March 19, 2010 at 2:40 am yes I know I’ve a tendency to do this myself. and the worst thing is I know I’m doing it and just can’t help myself (prisoner of impulse) PS Omarion as you’re clearly all man can you help me out with that gravatar thing. I really need to get it sorted before I go to work.
on March 19, 2010 at 2:42 am Is it so wrong that I now prefer faceless, soulless, yet youthful, perky and nubile specimens of the female form instead of women with actual personalities? The most BEAUTIFUL women I have ever seen:
on March 19, 2010 at 2:48 am Tupac is it so wrong that I now prefer faceless, soulless, yet youthful, perky and nubile specimens of the female form instead of women with actual personalities? Perfectly understandable after the way my big sis treated you.
on March 19, 2010 at 2:49 am PS tupac Gravatar help would be appreciated in consideration of my taking your side against Alias Clio
on March 19, 2010 at 2:50 am PPS box over head good way to hide adam’s apple
on March 19, 2010 at 2:54 am i wish i could meet a hot chick with the personality of an ugly chick
on March 19, 2010 at 2:59 am sdaelus, clear your your cache in Internet Explorer maybe restart windows too
on March 19, 2010 at 3:13 am Tupac, thanks so much, have a lovely day.
on March 19, 2010 at 3:26 am “Men cheat. Women betray.” I usually don’t comment. But this is So spot-on.
on March 19, 2010 at 3:29 am Men cook, women swap recepies.
on March 19, 2010 at 3:30 am btw this Mencken quote really sums up the 5th Horseman What men, in their egoism, constantly mistake for a deficiency of intelligence in woman is merely an incapacity for mastering that mass of small intellectual tricks, that complex of petty knowledges, that collection of cerebral rubber stamps, which constitutes the chief mental equipment of the average male. A man thinks that he is more intelligent than his wife because he can add up a column of figures more accurately, and because he understands the imbecile jargon of the stock market, and because he is able to distinguish between the ideas of rival politicians, and because he is privy to the minutiae of some sordid and degrading business or profession, say soap-selling or the law. But these empty talents, of course, are not really signs of a profound intelligence; they are, in fact, merely superficial accomplishments, and their acquirement puts little more strain on the mental powers than a chimpanzee suffers in learning how to catch a penny or scratch a match.
on March 19, 2010 at 4:23 am @ Anonymous “Breeze But more importantly, men believe in love as an ideal. This is an important difference between men and women, that most of us find very difficult to see. Because women fall in love as hard as men do. But women don’t value love for loves sake the way men do. They’ll leave a man they are completely smitten with for a guy with better future prospects. From a mans point of view of course this is sick and twisted and self defeating. Women have different priorities. Love has a different value for them. Probably even a different definition.” Women do have a different conception of love – though I doubt they define it so. Woman’s love is all about the gina tingle. @White Woman “namae nanka – What about “The Taming of the Shrew”?” Taming of the Shrew is the most alpha man around running game on a girl with her bitch shields at maximum. There are also subplots about betas throwing themselves at women. Shakespeare knew sexual relations well. His plays feature a depth of knowledge about both men and women, among other things. There is a reason people still love his plays and it has little to do with the flowery language.
on March 19, 2010 at 5:01 am Breeze Woman’s love is all about the gina tingle. I was anonymous you replied to. Ok, maybe women’s love is about the gina tingle. But then what is the gina tingle about? Saying it’s about the gina tingle says little. And my point was that a woman in love can have higher priorities still. The funny thing is, in her hypergamy she’ll convince herself that the new man is her new true love. And then of course after marrying him be disgusted by his form and stop fucking him. Women love money and status, truly. Or a rake, truly. They work very differently than men, and men have the hardest time keeping that in mind.
on March 19, 2010 at 6:30 am I’ve heard worse.
on March 19, 2010 at 6:58 am xsplat said: “The funny thing is, in her hypergamy she’ll convince herself that the new man is her new true love. And then of course after marrying him be disgusted by his form and stop fucking him.” Damn straight, dude! Keep that novel stimulation of “newcock” (oxcytocin) going or you’re just screwed-over for the next one, Tarzan!
on March 19, 2010 at 8:57 am [quote]What about “The Taming of the Shrew”?”[/quote] No point in reading fiction and of men who hide behind their characters to speak their minds.
on March 19, 2010 at 9:10 am According to HL Mencken- “Misogynist – A man who hates women as much as women hate one another.” Good ol’ times, but the definition is too simple for our times. A critique of his aforementioned lines: “A man’s women folk, whatever their outward show of respect for his merit and authority, ” Good ol’ Patriarchy. “always regard him secretly as an ass, and with something akin to pity.” Pity is the worst form of hate though a woman doesn’t know that; a woman’s love can turn into hate at the drop of a hat. “His most gaudy sayings and doings seldom deceive them; they see the actual man within, and know him for a shallow and pathetic fellow.” “Surface is woman’s nature, foam tossed to and fro on shallow water. But deep is man’s nature; his current flows in sub- terranean caverns: woman senses his power, but understands it not.” “A woman, like a child, has only the shallowest and most insubstantial of thoughts. If you were to try to paddle your feet in her oceans, you wouldn’t even get your feet wet.” Women can’t know more!! “In this fact, perhaps, lies one of the best proofs of feminine intelligence, or, as the common phrase makes it, feminine intuition. ” That’s an insult to intelligence; there is only feminine cunning that is hidden beneath the naivete that men percieve. “The mark of that so-called intuition is simply a sharp and accurate perception of reality,” haha “an habitual immunity to emotional enchantment, ” oh wow. “a relentless capacity for distinguishing clearly between the appearance and the substance.” The amusement continues. “The appearance, in the normal family circle, is a hero, magnifico, a demigod. The substance is a poor mountebank.” Nope, classic beta propped up in a patriacrchy.
on March 19, 2010 at 9:14 am FemX says, “And women do not want solidarity with men who are losers.” Then they don’t want solidarity. Part of the expression of solidarity is to purposefully blur or destroy class/hierarchy lines for a higher purpose, for the benefit of all. Remember, it was a great many “losers” working 20 hour days in coal mines and other atrocious conditions for a pittance, who could scarcely afford anything like what people today would think was required for basic human dignity, who voted for women to have the right to vote. A lot of dudes living four generations in a one room shack or cubicle…a lot of guys missing a lot of meals who sometimes spent a lot of tears for their wives and daughters getting sick and dying before their time from living in squalor. I have no doubt that the descendants of these souls have as much strength in them as their forefathers. One just has to not punish them for caring.
on March 19, 2010 at 9:17 am “What men, in their egoism, constantly mistake for a deficiency of intelligence in woman ” True, men can’t/don’t believe cunning to be interwoven with naivete in their woman. “is merely an incapacity for mastering that mass of small intellectual tricks, that complex of petty knowledges, that collection of cerebral rubber stamps, which constitutes the chief mental equipment of the average male. ” Men think and learn.Women rote and learn. Or perhaps the average male of his time didn’t know the difference. “A man thinks that he is more intelligent than his wife because he can add up a column of figures more accurately, and because he understands the imbecile jargon of the stock market, and because he is able to distinguish between the ideas of rival politicians, and because he is privy to the minutiae of some sordid and degrading business or profession, say soap-selling or the law.” The man does speak the truth, these reasons suck for woman.Woman have no worth for pursuits of mind, these do not further her aims. The man who prides them on such and expects a woman to do so is an imbecile. “But these empty talents, of course, are not really signs of a profound intelligence; they are, in fact, merely superficial accomplishments, and their acquirement puts little more strain on the mental powers than a chimpanzee suffers in learning how to catch a penny or scratch a match.” Abso-fcking-lutely true, that’s why you see so many women in universities these days.
on March 19, 2010 at 9:18 am I think Lena is right: Men are slaves to love. Others argue that we are slaves to lust, not love; but I believe that sex is how men perceive love. What makes us guys feel like a woman loves us? She has sex with us, and she enjoys the sex. Ever notice how important the pleasure and orgasms of roissy’s partners are to him? Men are slaves to love. Roissy probably more so than most of us. Ouch.
on March 19, 2010 at 9:35 am Roissy, good job of provocation. Most of the emotional disturbance on this thread is from people not recognizing the difference between categorical statements and generalizations whose validity, though real, is only statistical. Best comment: Breeze “Taming of the Shrew is the most alpha man around running game on a girl with her bitch shields at maximum. There are also subplots about betas throwing themselves at women. Shakespeare knew sexual relations well. His plays feature a depth of knowledge about both men and women” Too true. The Wikipedia article on this play is hilarious because it shows how much effort has been wasted on bizarre interpretations of what is going on. Breeze got it in one.
on March 19, 2010 at 10:31 am Huh, this post it linked to VerySmartBrothers, who wants to give a primer on HBD?
on March 19, 2010 at 11:00 am The world is fucked but it sure is beautiful. Men do cheat and women do betray. So much worse to betray. And frankly, if the woman you are keeping company with is not inspiring you then you shouldn’t be spending time with her. It is our job to inspire.
on March 19, 2010 at 11:22 am anoukange …And frankly, if the woman you are keeping company with is not inspiring you then you shouldn’t be spending time with her… Change that to “women”, plural, and you might leak wisdom.
on March 19, 2010 at 11:28 am Tupac! Yes, it’s wrong! It’s sooooo wrong!!!! Now turn that frown upside down! 😀
on March 19, 2010 at 11:49 am Nicole, you totally pwned me with that one.
on March 19, 2010 at 12:20 pm FemX, it was an accident. I just meant to remind folks of the history of the thing. Women’s suffering wasn’t isolated, and neither was women’s suffrage. Things were shitty and needed to change, and it took people from all classes to do that. It wasn’t something that just women or just elitists were interested in. In fact, the elitists were the most against it because a larger and more inclusive voter base meant their privileges were threatened.
on March 19, 2010 at 1:51 pm Roissy is at his best when he tells it like it is, early candidate for Roissy post of the year. Here’s one of my own. Men know what they want in women and pursue it shamelessly; Women know what they want in men but deny it to preserve their image. Ever watched something with an insanely Alpha male character, such as Mad Men, with a chick? ‘Don Draper is hot but I wouldn’t date a man like that’… ‘Don Draper is slimy because he cheats on his wife’… It’s the same thing with Tiger Woods, women shame his behavior but if given the chance 99.9% of them would jump into bed with him so fast they’d rip the continuum. Women can’t help being attracted to powerful men any more than men can’t help being attracted to beautiful women, only difference is we don’t trivialize and deny this fact because it’s what others think we should be doing. Ladies, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with desiring a powerful man, no matter what your feminist puppeteers tell you.
on March 19, 2010 at 2:31 pm Osiris, When my wife and I watch Mad Men I know she is hot for Don Draper and she knows I am hot for Betty Draper and Joan Holloway. That’s why we always watch it on DVD really late at night, in bed, after all the kids are asleep. Best marital aid ever. We also enjoy “The Big Bang Theory” which has a similar effect for the opposite reason. Is your name a near-anagram of Roissy’s by coincidence?
on March 19, 2010 at 2:42 pm I’m memorizing this
on March 19, 2010 at 3:09 pm ””””””Anonymouses Anonymous anoukange …And frankly, if the woman you are keeping company with is not inspiring you then you shouldn’t be spending time with her… Change that to “women”, plural, and you might leak wisdom. ””””””””’ Exactly what is beautifull is supposed to be considered ugly just another irony of life.
on March 19, 2010 at 8:48 pm It would be funny if it wouldn’t be so true. But this is just sad.
on March 19, 2010 at 10:32 pm Osiris-I think more than 1% of women would not sleep with Tiger Wood given the chance. He’s ugly and probably has genital warts at the very least. Fail.
on March 20, 2010 at 6:50 am If anyone likes Taming of the Shrew then I recommend you watch ‘McClintock’. Its a western with overtones of Taming of the Shrew and stars John Wayne and Maureen O’Hara as counterparts of Petruchio and Katherine.
on March 20, 2010 at 6:51 am I forgot to add that ‘McClintock’ is available in the public domain.
on March 20, 2010 at 7:22 am Thank you – are you sure you’re not mixing this up with The Quiet Man?
on March 20, 2010 at 7:56 am Moral of McClintock = drop the hammer & pick up the shovel?
on March 20, 2010 at 8:16 am @ sdafadfdafsdafgfgewas: What’s this about a hammer and shovel? I think you’re confused.
on March 20, 2010 at 8:25 am Surely if you’ve seen McClintock you’re aware that a coal shovel has apparently more than one use? Perhaps it’s central heating, rather than feminism, that’s led to the demise of the alpha male? [no more coal shovels] Gives a new meaning to the expression “digging oneself out”
on March 20, 2010 at 8:25 am PS the hammer was just thrown in to exercise the imagination.
on March 20, 2010 at 8:44 am sdaedalus you do seem like the sort of girl who’d like a good spanking with a coal shovel.
on March 20, 2010 at 8:54 am I couldn’t possibly comment. I’m relieved though that you got my name right this time.
on March 20, 2010 at 8:56 am PS Are you saying that I’m a bit of a shrew?
on March 20, 2010 at 11:25 am SD–you’re cracking me up! What’s gotten into you? 😉
on March 20, 2010 at 11:30 am It must be the spring air Anouk.
on March 20, 2010 at 12:28 pm How about: Men fuck; women blog? Boom boom! I’m here until Thursday, try the veal. Later, loserz.
on March 20, 2010 at 2:49 pm Men know what they want in women and pursue it shamelessly; Women know what they want in men but deny it to preserve their image. Only those with clear and explicit power may enjoy the luxuries of simplicity, honesty and directness. This applies in all affairs.
on March 20, 2010 at 10:39 pm Polymath – Mad Men is dope, and Joan is so sexy, a very voluptuous woman who knows and isn’t afraid to be sexy, I love it. And actually no it’s not an anagram of Roissy (though it’s close, good eye), Osiris was the God of the Dead in the Egyptian mythology…or a company that makes skate and snowboard wear, depending who you ask. White Woman – One more time, Women are attracted to men with power. It’s easy to dismiss a hypothetical when there’s no apparent chance if it’s happening, yet one more time with the preservation of the image. And of course you said he was ugly (he looks like a regular blackinese / jamasian guy to me), if you’re a man, looks follow power, status, fame and game by a distant margin. On a related note, fellas, don’t waste your time by asking a woman a hypothetical question, like ever. I retain that 99.9 percent of women, were they in Tiger’s stable of regulars, would acquiesce to his demands. Joey Giraud – Hot babes have clear and explicit power, and yet in my experience they still deny in words what they want. Thankfully they still give in to it, they say they wouldn’t, but they do.
on March 20, 2010 at 10:58 pm Your entire post sucks wind, Roissy. #1 you can switch genders on any one of your pithy proclamations and be just as accurate. All depends on the personality, not the gender. I’ve known men who are huge drama kings and women who are insufferable drama queens. Try again, genius.
on March 20, 2010 at 11:48 pm […] Roissy aka Citizen Revenge: The Most Misogynistic Blog Post On The Internet […]
on March 21, 2010 at 5:46 pm “you can switch genders on any one of your pithy proclamations and be just as accurate.” –that is actually true, you can. Men and women have evolved to be dead even at this point.
on March 22, 2010 at 11:47 am Women shop. Men buy.
on March 23, 2010 at 5:05 am all women do it for money one way or another a man pays for it women get money 3 ways inherit it marry it win it slave wages isnt money its chains stealing is a subsection of marriage
on March 24, 2010 at 1:30 am Remember, it was a great many “losers” working 20 hour days in coal mines and other atrocious conditions for a pittance, who could scarcely afford anything like what people today would think was required for basic human dignity, who voted for women to have the right to vote. A lot of dudes living four generations in a one room shack or cubicle…a lot of guys missing a lot of meals who sometimes spent a lot of tears for their wives and daughters getting sick and dying before their time from living in squalor. “But what have you done for me lately?”
on March 24, 2010 at 7:39 am Glengarry, I’ll admit I laughed. Sadly though, this is the attitude of most women running around calling themselves feminists. It’s never enough. They turned from one of the movements that was supposed to be about the people, to a kind of special interest lobby. They’re going to promote their agenda no matter what the farther reaching effects would be.
on March 26, 2010 at 1:46 am @Glengarry +5
on March 29, 2010 at 8:51 pm Men were designed to lead short brutal lives ; women were designed to lead long miserable ones. Howard Bloom – The Lucifer principle: a scientific expedition into the forces of history.
on April 3, 2010 at 10:22 am Men think logically. Women think audibly.
on April 3, 2010 at 11:07 am More feminist bull http://dukechronicle.com/article/boys-club
on April 20, 2010 at 12:06 pm It was a satire. http://www.theabsolute.net/minefield/bkwife.html Wife has taught me everything I know. Wisdom is gained through the experience of wife itself. Enlightenment is beyond wife and death. Wife is a long, hard road. Wife is an unbroken succession of false situations. Wife was not meant to be easy. We must strive to give our wives meaning. Is there wife after death? That is the question. He was a good man, full of wife. Unhappy? That’s wife. Despair comes to those who think about wife. Happy is the man who leads a charmed wife. Only in solitude can one study the mysteries of wife. Wife is an utter mystery to me. The secret to wife is that there is no secret. “How’s wife been treating you?” Marriage changed my wife for the worse. Wife is something to occupy you when you can’t get to sleep. Wife and death go hand in hand. Marriage is a matter of wife and death. Without death there can be no wife. Wife is a dead-end street. I am a man of principle. Whatever I do, I do for wife.
on June 22, 2010 at 9:18 am We are not slave to love, we are slave of a vagina. It’s not the same thing.
on February 23, 2011 at 12:14 pm not bad. creative, but not actually misogynistic, considering one feminist argument of something to do with both sexes being present within each individual blah blah… you obviously were able to put yourselves in their shoes (i.e. the shoes within ha) for long enough to produce this; reminiscent of Aleister Crowley and some idiot beat poet mixed together. I like!