Comments on: Deep Thoughts By Lizzy The Lezzy

By: anonymous

anonymous — Tue, 02 Jun 2015 06:08:15 +0000

Zionists are members of the synagogue of Satan. Since they want to raise hell, they have to destroy good-natured people. Once they are destroyed, the surviving r-selected nations over whom they’d rule will hate each other like never before. Everyone’s love will grow colder until this world becomes exclusively evil.

LikeLike

By: Alex the Goon

Alex the Goon — Fri, 29 May 2015 21:44:30 +0000

to aryanist 7:02pm,
RC = Roman Catholic

LikeLike

By: aryanist

aryanist — Thu, 28 May 2015 12:23:24 +0000

The comment I published above is a remark on one that has not yet been validated.

LikeLike

By: aryanist

aryanist — Thu, 28 May 2015 12:20:31 +0000

Most of the commentators are muslims, so do not worry to much about them.
To be “antisemite” is not the same thing that being “antizionist”. Antizionism (like zionism) is not antisemitism and is a diversion created by the Jews. All the Jews who count (in all meanings of the term) live outside of israel, that is a small piece of dry land in the Middle “East”. Furthermore, the israeli-palestinian conflit is an intra-semitic conflict that does not concern the white peoples and, if power was to be regained, it would be sufficient to stop all relations with this country (israel), to ensure its quick collapse, since it only persisted from the beginning by the tremendous helps granted by the “West” (including the hundreds of billions of dollars given to that parasitic country).

The comment about jihadists and Assad is inane given that the jihadist of the Al-Nosra Front are backed by Israel, inter alia, and that islamists, far from being opposant to the so-called “New World Order (sic)”, are only mere pawns used by it. One of its goal is one more time distration: while “westerners” have the eyes turned to Africa and Asia by watching what the subversive Media show, that is, among other things, violent islamic terrorism, they are distracted of the creeping invasion and islamization of the “West”.

Mozart’s music is freemasonic music, so no thank: freemasons-freemasonry (dot) com/mozart_freemasonry.html

The non-compassion of their deity (in fact they call it “The Most Compassionate”) is from a spiritual standpoint a positive thing, but only if it is devoid of any cruelty, what is not the case in this second Judaism for goyim. It is positive because any kind of feeling is only a mere psychic product and so is not at all spiritual.

Beauty and refinement are not expected from a virile standipoint, see “Tyrtaeus poetry”.

This world will be a Negro-Asian and Judeo-Islamic place in fifty years.

LikeLike

By: aryanist

aryanist — Thu, 28 May 2015 11:35:18 +0000

This video is very true and sad. And one more time, it does confirm pefectly that women, whatever their race, they are much closer, from a mental and spiritual standpoint, to the colored people than to the white ones. Now that they are “emancipated” (sic), this is constantly verifiable.

LikeLike

By: castricv

castricv — Thu, 28 May 2015 01:57:36 +0000

“amazing poetry by the original warrior poets, the Afghans.

God be with you always my friend, good video.”

“All songs in this video are better than US pop 10, will try to search for full versions. that said, I wish Jihadists would fight along side Assad against Zionist criminals”

I’m all about juice hate as well, but these idiot are so gone it’s amazing to watch. Keep in mind all of the comments are in English and all of them think the shrieking goat fikkin butchery of music is “beautiful”

It is inevitable that these people (by the hundreds of millions) will never see past their own pig sty of a worldview. They will bring it here and to Europe while thinking that they are perfectly reasonable civilized human beings. Curdling fart music paying tribute to poetic terrorists and the non-compassion of their diety is like us listening to Pavorotti or Mozart.

You cannot make others one of you by simply bringing them to your country and giving them McDonalds. They will simply overrun everything. This world will be an unpleasant place in 50 years.

Hope that clears it up.

LikeLike

By: aryanist

aryanist — Thu, 28 May 2015 01:14:00 +0000

In the quotation, there is a confusion between ceremony and ritual, the word “ceremony” must in fact be replaced by “ritual”.

LikeLike

By: aryanist

aryanist — Thu, 28 May 2015 01:02:31 +0000

English is not my native language and I do not know what “RC” means, but I guess it is “Religious Conservative”?
You cannot deny that the doctrine of sin (that all men are born sinners who should redeem themselves, including by “punishing themselves”) is at the core of Christianity and that it has had catastrophic effects on those (the Whites) who were taught this insanity from the craddle to the grave. The guiltiness was considered by the pre-christian white world as a repugnant feeling, as the rest of the lowering feelings and, to a fuller extent and for the bests, as all the feelings. “Religions” based on feelings, devotion, morality and faith were unknown to the “Aryan” peoples and are a product of a lower experience of “spirituality”, a lunar, feminine one, that is to be found especially among the Semites. In fact, one cannot even speak of “spirituality” since these religions are psychic products. What was important for them was the simple respect of (public and private) rituals, which were not mere ceremonies like in abrahamism but a form of action to enter in communion with supra-natural forces, of a spiritual nature. This is precisely what the roman archaic “mos majorum” was, a virile and solar cult, until semitic elements destroyed it step by step. The best example of this is that the old Roman Patricians granted less their military victories to their inner qualities, their excellent organization, their skills, the quality of their armament and fighting technics than to their respect of rituals, and the cause of a defeat or a victory was to be found primarily in the last. Moreover, the wars were experienced as being deeply sacred and spiritual experiences and from the beginning (even before the beginning) to the end of them, they were to be conducted according to specific rituals and following special rules, in a certain manner. One of these rituals, that was not “mandatory”, was called “devotio”. “According to the ancient Roman ritual of devotio, as we understand it, a warrior, and above all a chieftain, can facilitate victory by means of a mysterious unleashing of forces determined by the deliberate sacrifice of his own person, combined with the will not to come out of the fray alive. Let us recall the execution of this ritual by Consul Decius in the war against the Latins (340 B.C.), and also the repetition of it – exalted by Cicero (Fin. II, 19, 61; Tusc. I, 37, 39) – by two other members of the same family. This ritual had its own precise ceremony, testifying to the perfect knowledge and lucidity of this heroic-sacrificial offer. In proper hierarchical order, first the Olympian divinities of the Roman State, Janus, Jupiter, Quirinus, and then, immediately following this, the God of war, Pater Mars, and then, finally, certain indigenous gods, were invoked: “gods – it is said – which confer power to heroes over their enemies”; by the virtue of the sacrifice which these ancient Romans proposed to perform the gods were called upon “to grant strength and victory to the Roman people of the Quirites, and to sweep up with terror, fright and death the enemies of our people” (cf. Livy, VIII, 9). Proposed by the pontifex, the words of this formula were uttered by the warrior, arrayed in the praetesta, his foot upon a javelin. After that he plunged into the fray, to die. Incidentally, here the transformation of the sense of the word ‘devotio’ must be noticed. While it applied originally to this order of ideas, that is, to a heroic, sacrificial and evocative action, in the later Empire it came to mean simply the fidelity of the citizen and his scrupulosity in payment to the State treasury (devotio rei annonariaei. As Bouché-Leclercq” puts it, in the end, “after Caesar was replaced by the Christian God, devotio means simply religiosity, the faith ready for all sacrifices, and then, in a further degeneration of the expression, devotion in the common sense of the word, that is, constant concern for salvation, affirmed in a meticulous and tremulous practice of the cult”. Leaving this aside in the ancient Roman devotio we find, as we have shown, very precise signs of a mysticism aware of heroism and of sacrifice, binding the feeling of a super-natural and super-human reality tightly to the will to struggle with dedication in the name of one’s own Chieftain, one’s own State and one’s own race. There are plenty of testimonies to an ‘Olympian’ feeling of combat and victory peculiar to our ancient traditions. We have discussed this extensively elsewhere. Let us only recall here that in the ceremony of the triumph the victorious dux displayed in Rome the insignia of the Olympian god to indicate the real force within him which had brought about his victory; let us recall also that beyond the mortal Caesar Romanity worshipped Caesar as ‘perennial victor’, that is, as a sort of supra-personal force of Roman destiny.

Thus, if succeeding times have made other views prevail the most ancient traditions still show us that the ideal of an Olympian ‘heroism’ has been our ideal also, and that our people also have experienced the absolute offering, the consummation of a whole existence in a force hurled against the enemy in a gesture which justifies the most complete evocation of abysmal forces; and which brings about, finally, a victory which transforms the victors and enables their participation in supra-personal and ‘fatal’ powers. And so in our heritage points of reference are indicated which stand in radical opposition to the sub-personal and collectivist heroism we discussed above, and not only to that, but to every tragic and irrational vision, which ignores what is stronger than fire and iron, and stronger than life and death.” (*)

It was the same for the Spartans, another heroic Nordic people.

As to wicca, odinism and the like, they are ersatz of Christianity and mere fantasies to satisfy the imagination of some romantics.

Now, look what happened due to the spiritual and mental emasculation caused by the first judaism for goyim.

(*) “Metaphysics of War”, JULIUS EVOLA.

LikeLike

By: ho

ho — Wed, 27 May 2015 23:33:29 +0000

I’ve read the comments. What exactly are you talking about?

LikeLike

By: 08nagaer

08nagaer — Wed, 27 May 2015 23:27:27 +0000

I was raised a Catholic, but I tend to behave more like a deist or agnostic. My sympathies lie with the Christian tradcons either way.

And, Christ was no fan of Bernankifying, usurious “money changers”.

LikeLike