Feed on
Posts
Comments

Tucker Takes The Crimson Pill

Media Matters, a far left-wing “gotcha” opposition research outlet for the Democortez Party, found some old audio of Tucker Carlson dropping 100% TRUEFACT crimson pills on a call-in radio show, proving that ol’ Tuck even from his bow-tie days has more testosterone than the collected T level of the entirety of the Uniparty in our lifetimes.

During call-in segments on “Bubba the Love Sponge Show” between 2006 and 2011, the future Fox News host said that women enjoy being told to “be quiet and kind of do what you’re told” suggested that statutory rape isn’t like “pulling a child from a bus stop and sexually assaulting” them and described Martha Stewart’s daughter, Alexis, as “c–ty.”

[…]

In one 2009 audio recording, Carlson said, “I am not defending underage marriage at all — I just don’t think it’s the same thing exactly as pulling a child from a bus stop and sexually assaulting that child… The rapist, in this case, has made a lifelong commitment to live and take care of the person, so it is a little different. I mean, let’s be honest about it.”

[…]

He then mentioned reading a story about a teacher who molested her 13-year-old student “28 times in one week,” and asked Bubba, “Are you physically capable of doing that or do you take your hat off to this kid?” Carlson added, “So my point is that teacher’s like this, not necessarily this one in particular, but they are doing a service to all 13-year-old girls by taking the pressure off. They are a pressure relief valve, like the kind you have on your furnace.”

Other segments with Carlson on “Bubba the Love Sponge Show” had the conservative commentator suggesting the elimination of rape shield laws (“It gives the accuser all the power”), calling Martha Stewart’s daughter “very c—y,” and Britney Spears and Paris Hilton “two of the biggest white whores in America.”

Where are the lies?

The best Tucker quote reads like a classic from the CH archives,

CARLSON: By the way, women hate you when they do you wrong and you put up with it.

CO-HOST: Exactly.

CARLSON: Because they hate weakness. They’re like dogs that way. They can smell it on you, and they have contempt for it, they’ll bite you.

CALRSON: I mean, I love women, but they’re extremely primitive, they’re basic, they’re not that hard to understand. And one of the things they hate more than anything is weakness in a man.

Potent. Reminds me of this:

It is said of blind patriots that they follow “my country, right or wrong.” Well, for women, it’s “my alpha, right or wrong.” And what is a defining characteristic of alphaness? Boldness. Women love bold men, right or wrong. Women hate squirrelly men…

A reader jokes,

Tucker should have been more accurate and said,at least, TWO “EXTREMELY”s, and, put a ‘very very’ in front of “basic”,then, he would have nailed it!!!

In those radio interviews, Carlson sounds like he is practically cribbing from my blog.

My god, do you know what this means?

He gathers his family around to read CH blog poasts!

Tuck’s respectable T level status, confirmed:

Media Matters caught me saying something naughty on a radio show more than a decade ago. Rather than express the usual ritual contrition, how about this: I’m on television every weeknight live for an hour,” Carlson continued. “If you want to know what I think, you can watch. Anyone who disagrees with my views is welcome to come on and explain why.

No apology. Like a breath of fresh air. Ahhh….hear that? It’s freedom. Dignity. And ZFG. Trump reintroduced these masculine qualities to America. Tucker Carlson carries the banner forward.

PS More preening incoming.

Trump retweeted Chuck Ross.

This is yuge, because Chuck was once a commenter at CH.

So….President Trump is now officially one degree removed from personal acquaintance with greatness.

PPS Tucker is basically correct that women aren’t that hard to understand….once you know what to look for and accept the Rude Word in your life.

Women only seem complex to men because women think and strategize differently. After a man cracks the female code, the simplicity of it both astonishes and aggravates. (The latter caused by the regret of years wasted polishing a pussy pedestal that never needed polishing.)

And to be fair to the counter-argument, women are more complex — ie harder to read — early on in a courtship, because women are filtering for a host of high smv traits in a man, whereas comparatively men’s buttons are easy to locate and push — be young, hot, and slender.

However, the complexity differential shifts to a more equitable balance in longer relationships, because men start filtering for qualities in women that indicate faithfulness and mothering instinct.

The complexity of women is only a TROPE because relative to the mechanism and algorithm of male desire, female desire can seem inscrutable to men without disillusioning experience bedding women. Since more men, generally, have a harder time getting sex than do women, there are more men who falsely believe (partly to assuage their hurt egos) that women are deeply complex creatures that mere mortal men can’t fathom.

Men who insist women are “complex” traffic in a version of sour grapes.

[crypto-donation-box]

Comments are closed.